{"id":"qipu:sf/place/block/2997","kind":"block","name":"Assessor block 2997","block":"2997","neighbourhood":"West of Twin Peaks","tied_by":"block","named":[],"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed35sanfrich|210",1940,1940,"1940-03-18","ordinance","the-street","passed first reading","City to take over the new roadway on Teresita Boulevard; passed first reading only","unverified","journalofproceed35sanfrich",630,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed35sanfrich/page/n630",null,"Ordinance No , as follows: Providing for the acceptance of the roadway of Teresita Boulevard between Los Palmos Drive and Stanford Heights Avenue; Teresita Boulevard between the existing pavement 240 feet more or less East of Foerster Street and Foerster Street. Be it ordained by the People of the C",null,null,"b,p","m",0,2.14],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed35sanfrich|225",1940,1940,"1940-04-01","ordinance","the-street","passed","City takes over the new roadway on Teresita Boulevard","unverified","journalofproceed35sanfrich",702,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed35sanfrich/page/n702",null,"Ordinance No , as follows: Providing for the acceptance of the roadway of Teresita Boulevard between Los Palmos Drive and Stanford Heights Avenue; Teresita Boulevard between the existing pavement 240 feet more or less East of Foerster Street and Foerster Street. Be it ordained by the People of the C",null,null,"b,p","m",0,2.14],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed54sanfrich|581",1959,1959,"1959-12-14","ordinance","public-money","passed first reading","[name withheld] claim against the city settled for $350 (≈ $4,053 in 2026 dollars)","unverified","journalofproceed54sanfrich",846,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed54sanfrich/page/n839",null,null,null,null,"b,p","m",0,-0.09],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed54sanfrich|584",1959,1959,"1959-12-21","ordinance","public-money","passed","[name withheld] claim against the city settled for $350 (≈ $4,053 in 2026 dollars)","unverified","journalofproceed54sanfrich",854,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed54sanfrich/page/n847",null,null,null,null,"b,p","m",0,-0.09],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed55sanfrich|18",1960,1960,"1960-01-18","ordinance","getting-around","passed first reading","$3,409 (≈ $38,805 in 2026 dollars) for communicable disease supplies, to pass as an emergency; passed first reading only; no final vote yet","unverified","journalofproceed55sanfrich",45,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed55sanfrich/page/n44",null,null,null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.76],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed55sanfrich|23",1960,1960,"1960-01-25","ordinance","getting-around","passed","Emergency relief grants extended for dependent non-residents into February","unverified","journalofproceed55sanfrich",53,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed55sanfrich/page/n52",null,null,null,null,"b,p","m",0,2.44],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed55sanfrich|44",1960,1960,"1960-02-15","ordinance","the-street",null,"City aid for Los Palmos Drive work to be raised to $8,200 (≈ $93,341 in 2026 dollars); passed first reading only; later finally passed","unverified","journalofproceed55sanfrich",92,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed55sanfrich/page/n91",null,null,null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed55sanfrich|53",1960,1960,"1960-02-23","ordinance","the-street",null,"City aid for Los Palmos Drive work raised to $8,200 (≈ $93,341 in 2026 dollars)","unverified","journalofproceed55sanfrich",102,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed55sanfrich/page/n101",null,null,null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceed55sanfrich/101/c9c20850",1960,1960,"1960-02-23","ordinance",null,"passed","City aid for Los Palmos Drive work raised to $8,200 (≈ $93,341 in 2026 dollars)","unverified","journalofproceed55sanfrich",102,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed55sanfrich/page/n101",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed56sanfrich|24",1961,1961,"1961-01-23","motion","public-money","passed","Los Palmos Drive paving assessment confirmed and sent to the contractor","quoted","journalofproceed56sanfrich",41,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed56sanfrich/page/n40",null,null,null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.43],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceed56sanfrich/40/5342756c",1961,1961,"1961-01-23","motion",null,"passed","Los Palmos Drive paving assessment confirmed and sent to the contractor","unverified","journalofproceed56sanfrich",41,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed56sanfrich/page/n40",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:meetingjuneaug2006minutes101sanfrich/90/8e0f2e5d",2006,2006,"2006-06-13","resolution",null,"referred","All-way stops for Brussels and Foerster Streets sent to committee","unverified","meetingjuneaug2006minutes101sanfrich",91,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjuneaug2006minutes101sanfrich/page/n90",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjuneaug2006minutes101sanfrich|43",2006,2006,"2006-06-13","resolution","getting-around","referred","All-way stops for Brussels and Foerster Streets sent to committee","quoted","meetingjuneaug2006minutes101sanfrich",91,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjuneaug2006minutes101sanfrich/page/n90",null,null,null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2011sanf|125",2011,2011,"2011-02-15","motion","running-the-city","refused","A move to overturn the environmental exemption for Foerster and Los Palmos","quoted","meetingminutesbo2011sanf",149,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2011sanf/page/n148",null,null,null,null,"B,P","m",0,2.34],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2011sanf|126",2011,2011,"2011-02-15","motion","running-the-city","continued","Clerk asked to write findings reversing the 795 Foerster Street exemption","unverified","meetingminutesbo2011sanf",150,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2011sanf/page/n149",null,null,null,null,"B,P","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:meetingminutesbo2011sanf/257/8e95eb2f",2011,2011,"2011-03-22","motion",null,null,"Environmental exemption upheld for 795 Foerster Street and Los Palmos Drive","unverified","meetingminutesbo2011sanf",258,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2011sanf/page/n257",null,null,null,null,"P","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2011sanf|219",2011,2011,"2011-03-22","motion","running-the-city","passed","Environmental exemption upheld for 795 Foerster Street and Los Palmos Drive","unverified","meetingminutesbo2011sanf",258,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2011sanf/page/n257",null,null,null,null,"B,P","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2011sanf|220",2011,2011,"2011-03-22","motion","running-the-city","refused","A move to overturn the environmental exemption for Foerster and Los Palmos","unverified","meetingminutesbo2011sanf",259,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2011sanf/page/n258",null,null,null,null,"B,P","a",0,2.04],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2011sanf|222",2011,2011,"2011-03-22","motion","running-the-city","tabled","Clerk asked to write findings reversing the 795 Foerster Street exemption","quoted","meetingminutesbo2011sanf",259,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2011sanf/page/n258",null,null,null,null,"B,P","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sd:12c3f66900",2011,2011,"2011-03-22",null,"appeals","passed","795 Foerster and Los Palmos Drive project needs no environmental study","unverified",null,null,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2011sanf/page/n257/mode/1up",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,0.66]]}