{"id":"qipu:sf/place/block/3909","kind":"block","name":"Assessor block 3909","block":"3909","neighbourhood":"Mission","tied_by":"block","named":[],"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1914sanfrich|392",1914,1914,"1914-03-23","resolution","the-street","passed","G. W. McGinn delayed by squatters at Ninth and Division Streets","quoted","journalofproceed1914sanfrich",341,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1914sanfrich/page/n341",null,"Resolution No. 10759 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That G. W. McGinn & Co. is hereby granted an extension of 60 days' time from and after April 4, 1914, within Which to complete contract for the improvement of the Intersection of Ninth street, San Bruno avenue and Division street. This extensi",null,null,"b,p","m",0,1.61],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1914sanfrich|741",1914,1914,"1914-06-01","resolution","the-street",null,"G. W. McGinn given 30 more days at Ninth and Division","quoted","journalofproceed1914sanfrich",634,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1914sanfrich/page/n634",null,"Resolution No. 10909 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That G. W. McGinn & Co. is hereby granted an extension of thirty days' time from and after June 3, 1914, within which to complete contract for the improvement of the intersection of Ninth street, San Bruno avenue and Division street. This exte",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1914sanfrich|1875",1914,1914,"1914-12-21","resolution","running-the-city",null,"McGinn & Co. gets a hearing on its paving bill","unverified","journalofproceed1914sanfrich",1497,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1914sanfrich/page/n1497",null,"Resolution No. 11381 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That Monday, December 14, 1914, at the hour of 3 p. m., in the chambers of the Board of Supervisors, be fixed as the time for hearing the appeal of Geo. W. McGinn & Co. from the assessment warrant and diagram issued to Geo. W. McGinn & Co., fo",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1918sanfrich|146",1918,1918,"1918-02-04","ordinance","the-street",null,"Division, Eighth and Townsend streets to be paved","unverified","journalofproceed1918sanfrich",120,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1918sanfrich/page/n117",null,"Ordinance of said City and County of San Francisco, said work to be performed under the direction of the Board of Public Works, and to be done in accordance with the specifications prepared therefor by said Board of Public Works, and on file in its office, which said plans and specifications are her",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1918sanfrich|311",1918,1918,"1918-03-04","resolution","getting-around","passed","Southern Pacific and Western Pacific ordered to pave Division Street","quoted","journalofproceed1918sanfrich",214,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1918sanfrich/page/n211",null,"Resolution No. 56880 (Second Series), adopted January 7, 1918, recommend that the Board of Supervisors direct the Southern Pacific Company and the Western Pacific Railroad Company to construct the pavement for which these companies are respectively obligated under their franchises, and sijur track p",null,null,"p","m",0,3.37],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1918sanfrich|873",1918,1918,"1918-06-24","resolution","the-street","passed","Fay Improvement Company given ninety more days on Division Street","unverified","journalofproceed1918sanfrich",618,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1918sanfrich/page/n609",null,"Resolution No. 15826 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the Fay Improvement Company is hereby granted an extension of ninety days from and after .July 18, 1918, within which to complete contract for grading, curbing and paving Division street between San Bruno avenue and termination of King an",null,null,"p","m",0,1.56],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1918sanfrich|1327",1918,1918,"1918-11-11","resolution","the-street","passed","Fay Improvement Co. given 120 more days on Division Street","quoted","journalofproceed1918sanfrich",1056,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1918sanfrich/page/n1047",null,"Resolution No. 16233 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the Fay Improvement Co. is hereby granted an extension of one hundred and twenty days' time from and after October 16, 1918, within which to complete contract for the improvement of Division street between San Bruno avenue and De Haro str",null,null,"p","m",0,1.66],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1919sanfrich|93",1919,1919,"1919-02-03","ordinance","the-street","passed first reading","City to take over the new roadway on Chenery Street; passed first reading only","quoted","journalofproceed1919sanfrich",93,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1919sanfrich/page/n93",null,"Ordinance No. (New Series), entitled, \"Providing for conditional acceptance of the roadway of Chenery street between Diamond and Elk streets, including the intersections of Thor avenue, Brompton avenue, Chilton avenue, Hamerton avenue, Brunswick avenue, Surrey street, Mizpah street and Elk street, a",null,null,"b,p","m",0,2.14],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1919sanfrich|107",1919,1919,"1919-02-10","ordinance","the-street",null,"City to take over the new roadway on Chenery Street","unverified","journalofproceed1919sanfrich",105,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1919sanfrich/page/n105",null,"Ordinance No. 4779 (New Series), entitled, \"Providing for conditional acceptance of the roadway of Chenery street between Diamond and Elk streets, including the intersections of Thor avenue, Brompton avenue, Chilton avenue, Hamerton avenue, Brunswick avenue, Surrey street. Mizpah street and Elk stre",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|974",1927,1927,"1927-04-25","ordinance","the-street",null,"Sidewalk widths reset on Division Street, some walks abolished","unverified","journalofproceed22sanfrich",736,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n736",null,"Ordinance No. 1061, entitled \"Regulating the Width of Sidewalks,\" approved December 18, 1903, be and is hereby amended in acordance with the communication of the Board of Public Works, filed in this office April 7, 1927, by amending Section fourty-four thereof, to read as follows: Section 44. The wi",null,null,"p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed56sanfrich|g555",1961,1961,"1961-05-15","ordinance","works","passed","Division Street sewer reinforced near railroad tracks, paid by railroad","quoted","journalofproceed56sanfrich",298,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed56sanfrich/page/n297",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,2.24],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceedjanjune78sanfrich|167",1983,1983,"1983-05-02","resolution","getting-around","passed","New parking rules proposed for San Bruno Avenue near Division","quoted","journalofproceedjanjune78sanfrich",491,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceedjanjune78sanfrich/page/n488",null,null,null,null,"b,p","m",0,1.26],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceedjanjune78sanfrich/488/9feb6f5f",1983,1983,"1983-05-02","resolution",null,"passed","New parking rules proposed for San Bruno Avenue near Division","unverified","journalofproceedjanjune78sanfrich",491,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceedjanjune78sanfrich/page/n488",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0]]}