{"id":"qipu:sf/place/block/6712","kind":"block","name":"Assessor block 6712","block":"6712","neighbourhood":"Glen Park","tied_by":"block","named":[],"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1913sanfrich|1648",1913,1913,"1913-12-01","resolution","the-street","passed","G. W. McGinn given thirty more days paving Diamond Street","quoted","journalofproceed1913sanfrich",1358,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1913sanfrich/page/n1358",null,"Resolution No. 10578 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That G. W. McGinn & Co. is hereby granted an extension of thirty days' time from and after November 8, 1913, within which to complete the work of paving, under private contract. Diamond street, between Surrey and Sussex streets. This extension",null,null,"b,p","m",0,1.73],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceed1913sanfrich/1358/1b3ddf47",1913,1913,"1913-12-01","resolution",null,"passed","G. W. McGinn given thirty more days paving Diamond Street","unverified","journalofproceed1913sanfrich",1358,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1913sanfrich/page/n1358",null,"Extensions of Time — Diamond street, between Surrey and Sussex streets.",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1917sanfrich|1610",1917,1917,"1917-10-09","resolution","the-street",null,"Street levels to be changed on Surrey and Van Buren streets","unverified","journalofproceed1917sanfrich",1551,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1917sanfrich/page/n1551",null,"Resolution No. 53270 (Second Series) of the Board of Public Works adopted September 26, 1917, and written recommendation of said Board, filed September 28, 1917, to-wit: On Surrey street, between Chenery street and Lippard avenue; on Van Buren street, between Surrey street and the beginning of the f",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1918sanfrich|438",1918,1918,"1918-03-25","resolution","the-street",null,"Street levels to change on Sussex Street and Van Buren Street","unverified","journalofproceed1918sanfrich",288,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1918sanfrich/page/n285",null,"Resolution No. 58081 (Second Series) of the Board of Public Works adopted March 20, 1918, and written recommendation of said Board, filed March 21, 1918, to-wit: On Sussex street between Conrad and Diamond streets; on Van Buren street between Sussex street and a point southerly therefrom. The Board ",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sq:b236f39593",1918,1918,"1918-03-25",null,null,"passed","Street levels changed on Sussex Street between Conrad and Diamond","unverified","journalofproceed1918sanfrich",288,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1918sanfrich/page/n285",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1918sanfrich|482",1918,1918,"1918-04-01","ordinance","the-street",null,"Sidewalks on Sussex Street set at eight feet wide","unverified","journalofproceed1918sanfrich",308,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1918sanfrich/page/n305",null,"Ordinance No. . 1061, entitled, \"Regulating the Width of Side- Walks,\" approved December 18, 1903, be and is hereby amended in accordance with the communication of the Board of Public Works, filed in this office March 25, 1918, by adding thereto a new section to be numbered seven hundred and eight, ",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1918sanfrich|500",1918,1918,"1918-04-08","ordinance","the-street",null,"Sidewalks on Sussex Street set at eight feet wide","unverified","journalofproceed1918sanfrich",321,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1918sanfrich/page/n318",null,"Ordinance No. 1061, entitled. 'Regulating the Width of Side- Walks,\" approved December 18, 1903, be and is hereby amended in accordance with the communication of the Board of Public Works, filed in this office March 25, 1918, by adding thereto a new section to be numbered seven hundred and eight, to",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1918sanfrich|704",1918,1918,"1918-05-20","ordinance","the-street","passed first reading","Street levels to be changed on Sussex and Van Buren Streets","quoted","journalofproceed1918sanfrich",465,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1918sanfrich/page/n458",null,"Ordinance No. (New Series), entitled, \"Changing and re-establishing the official grades on Sussex street between the westerly line of Conrad street and the easterly line of Diamond street; on Van Buren street between Sussex street and the beginning of the first curve southerly therefrom; and on an a",null,null,"b,p","m",0,1.95],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1918sanfrich|728",1918,1918,"1918-05-27","ordinance","the-street",null,"Street levels to be changed on Sussex and Van Buren Streets","unverified","journalofproceed1918sanfrich",487,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1918sanfrich/page/n480",null,"Ordinance No. 4602 (New Series I, entitled, \"Changing and ire-establishing the official grades on Sussex street between the westerly line of Conrad street and the easterly line of Diamond street; on Van Buren street between Sussex street and the ibeginning of the first curve southerly therefrom; and",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|202",1927,1927,"1927-01-24","ordinance","the-street","passed first reading","Sidewalks on Sussex Street to be set at eight feet wide; passed first reading only","unverified","journalofproceed22sanfrich",155,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n155",null,"Ordinance No. 1061, entitled \"Regulating the Width of Sidewalks,\" approved December 18, 1903. be and is hereby amended in accordance with the communication of the Board of Public Works filed in this office January 11, 1927, by adding thereto a new section, to be numbered nine hundred and fortyeight,",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|204",1927,1927,"1927-01-24","ordinance","the-street","passed first reading","Sidewalks on Diamond Street to be set at eight feet wide; passed first reading only","unverified","journalofproceed22sanfrich",156,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n156",null,"Ordinance No. 1061, entitled \"Regulating the Width of Sidewalks,\" approved December IS, 1903, be and is hereby amended in accordance with the communication of the Board of Public Works filed in this office January 11, 1927, by adding thereto a new section, to be numbered nine hundred and fortynine, ",null,null,"p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|243",1927,1927,"1927-01-31","ordinance","the-street",null,"Sidewalks on Sussex Street set at eight feet wide","unverified","journalofproceed22sanfrich",183,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n183",null,"Ordinance No. 1061, entitled \"Regulating the Width of Sidewalks,\" approved December 18, 1903, be and is hereby amended in accordance with the communication of the Board of Public Works filed in this office January 11, 1927, by adding thereto a new section, to be numbered nine hundred and fortyeight,",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|244",1927,1927,"1927-01-31","ordinance","the-street",null,"Sidewalks between Diamond and Elk streets set at ten feet","unverified","journalofproceed22sanfrich",183,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n183",null,"Ordinance No. 1061, entitled \"Regulating the Width of Sidewalks,\" approved December 18, 1903, be and is hereby amended in accordance with the communication of the Board of Public Works filed in this office January 14, 1927, by adding thereto a new section, to be numbered nine hundred and fortyseven,",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|245",1927,1927,"1927-01-31","ordinance","the-street",null,"Sidewalks on Diamond Street set at eight feet wide","unverified","journalofproceed22sanfrich",183,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n183",null,"Ordinance No. 1061, entitled \"Regulating the Width of Sidewalks,\" approved December 18, 1903, be and is hereby amended in accordance with the communication of the Board of Public Works filed in this office January 11, 1927, by adding thereto a new section, to be numbered nine hundred and fortynine, ",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|862",1927,1927,"1927-04-11","ordinance","the-street","passed first reading","Street levels to be changed on Cayuga and Santa Rosa avenues","unverified","journalofproceed22sanfrich",648,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n648",null,"Ordinance No. (New Series), entitled \"Changing and reestablishing the official grades on Cayuga avenue between the northeasterly line of Santa Rosa avenue and Santa Ynez avenue; on Santa Rosa avenue between Alemany and Capistrano avenues; on Bauer street between Alemany and Cayuga avenues, and on Sa",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|898",1927,1927,"1927-04-18","ordinance","the-street",null,"Street levels changed on Sussex Street near Diamond","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",688,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n688",null,"Ordinance No. 7506 New Series), as follows: Changing and reestablishing the fficial grades on Sussex street between Conrad street and the westerly curb line of Diamond street. Whereas, the Board of Supervisors, on the written recommendation of the Board of Public Works, did, on the 28th day of Janua",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sq:c383409b8e",1927,1927,"1927-04-18",null,null,"passed","Street levels changed on Sussex Street between Conrad and Diamond","unverified","journalofproceed22sanfrich",688,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n688",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceed22sanfrich/1840/16cb6691",1927,1927,"1927-09-19","ordinance",null,null,"Sussex Street between Diamond and Conrad streets to be improved","unverified","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1840,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1840",null,"The improvement of Sussex street between Diamond and Conrad streets, including the intersection of Van Buren and Sussex streets, by the construction of concrete curbs…",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich|169",1928,1928,"1928-01-23","resolution","the-street",null,"Small paving jobs paid for on Diamond, Bluxome and Elizabeth streets","unverified","journalofproceed23sanfrich",125,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n125",null,"Resolution No. 28360 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the following amounts be and the same are hereby set aside and appropriated out of County Road Fund for construction in the following streets, towit: Diamond street, Surrey and Sussex streets, $50. Cortland avenue and Folsom street, $75. ",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich|2627",1929,1929,"1929-11-04","ordinance","the-street",null,"Seven-foot sidewalks set for Conrad, Arbor and Moreland Streets","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",2198,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n2198",null,"Ordinance No. 1061, entitled \"Regulating the Width of Sidewalks,\" approved December 18, 1903, be and is hereby amended in accordance with the communication of the Board of Public Works, filed in this office October 12, 1929, by adding thereto new sections to be numbered 1072 to 1077, inclusive, to r",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich|2628",1929,1929,"1929-11-04","ordinance","the-street",null,"Sidewalks on Sussex Street set at ten feet wide","unverified","journalofproceed24sanfrich",2198,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n2198",null,"Ordinance No. 1061, entitled \"Regulating the Width of Sidewalks, approved December 18, 1903, be and is hereby amended in accordance with the communication of the Board of Public Works, filed in this office October 12, 1929, by amending Section 947 thereof, to read as follows: Section 947. The width ",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich|2663",1929,1929,"1929-11-18","ordinance","the-street",null,"Sidewalk widths fixed on Louisburg and Tara Streets","unverified","journalofproceed24sanfrich",2237,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n2237",null,"Ordinance No. 1061, entitled \"Regulating the Width of Sidewalks,\" approved December 18, 1903, be and is hereby amended in accordance with the communication of the Board of Public Works, filed in this office October 28, 1929, by adding thereto new sections to be numbered 1079 to 1081, inclusive, to r",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich|2664",1929,1929,"1929-11-18","ordinance","the-street",null,"Seven-foot sidewalks set for Conrad, Arbor and Moreland Streets","unverified","journalofproceed24sanfrich",2237,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n2237",null,"Ordinance No. 1061, entitled \"Regulating the Width of Sidewalks,\" approved December 18, 1903, be and is hereby amended in accordance with the communication of the Board of Public Works, filed in this office October 12, 1929, by adding thereto new sections to be numbered 1072 to 1077, inclusive, to r",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich|2665",1929,1929,"1929-11-18","ordinance","the-street","passed","Sidewalks on Sussex Street set at ten feet wide","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",2238,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n2238",null,"Ordinance No. 1061, entitled \"Regulating the Width of Sidewalks, approved December 18, 1903, be and is hereby amended in accordance with the communication of the Board of Public Works, filed in this office October 12, 1929, by amending Section 947 thereof, to read as follows: Section 947. The width ",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-0.77],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26sanfrich|414",1931,1931,"1931-03-02","resolution","the-street","passed","C. B. Eaton given 90 more days on Diamond Street","quoted","journalofproceed26sanfrich",569,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26sanfrich/page/n548",null,"Resolution No. 33429 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That C. B. Eaton is hereby granted an extension of ninety days' time from and after February 19, 1931, in which to complete improvement of Diamond street, between Moffitt and Conrad streets. This extension of time is granted on the recommendat",null,null,"p","m",0,1.73],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich|905",1931,1931,"1931-11-23","ordinance","the-street","passed first reading","City to take over roadways on Cayuga, Diamond and Sussex streets","unverified","journalofproceed26part2sanfrich",987,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich/page/n962",null,"Ordinance No. (New Series), as follows: Providing for full acceptance of the roadways of the following streets : Cayuga avenue between Seneca and Oneida avenues. Intersection of Cayuga avenue and Greece street. Benton avenue between Alemany boulevard and Genebern way. Bradford street between Cortlan",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed27sanfrich|480",1932,1932,"1932-09-06","resolution","the-street",null,"Lane west of Castro Street named Poppy Lane","unverified","journalofproceed27sanfrich",1588,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed27sanfrich/page/n1588",null,"Resolution No. 408, as follows: Resolved, That the name of that certain lane westerly from Castro street between Moffitt street and Sussex street to Diamond street, and westerly from Diamond street between Arbor street and Susssx street to Conrad street, be and is hereby named \"Poppy Lane.\" Ayes — S",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich|125",1933,1933,"1933-04-10","ordinance","the-street","passed","Street levels changed on the unnamed alley between Surrey and Sussex","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",587,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n587",null,"Ordinance No. 12.072210, as follows: Changing and reestablishing the official grades on Alley (no name) between Surrey and Sussex streets from Diamond street southeasterly. Whereas, the Board of Supervisors, on the written recommendation of the Department of Public Works, did, on the 31st day of Jan",null,null,"b,p","m",0,1.95],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich|126",1933,1933,"1933-04-10","resolution","the-street",null,"Street levels to be set on the alley off Diamond Street","unverified","journalofproceed28sanfrich",587,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n587",null,"Resolution No. 609, declare its intention to change and reestablish the grades on Alley (no name) between Surrey and Sussex streets from Diamond street southeasterly. Whereas, said resolution was so published for ten days, and the Department of Public Works within ten days after the first publicatio",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sq:68db02b234",1933,1933,"1933-04-10",null,null,"passed","Intention to set grades on the unnamed alley between Surrey and Sussex","unverified","journalofproceed28sanfrich",587,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n587",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sq:f957a50005",1933,1933,"1933-04-10",null,null,"passed","Grades changed on the unnamed alley between Surrey and Sussex streets","unverified","journalofproceed28sanfrich",587,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n587",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich|154",1933,1933,"1933-04-24","ordinance","the-street","passed","Street levels changed on the unnamed alley between Surrey and Sussex","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",721,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n721",null,"Ordinance No. 12.072210, as follows: Changing and reestablishing the official grades on Alley (no name) between Surrey and Sussex streets from Diamond street southeasterly. Whereas, the Board of Supervisors, on the written recommendation of the Department of Public Works, did, on the 31st day of Jan",null,null,"b,p","m",0,1.95],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich|155",1933,1933,"1933-04-24","resolution","the-street",null,"Street levels to be set on the alley off Diamond Street","unverified","journalofproceed28sanfrich",721,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n721",null,"Resolution No. 609, declare its intention to change and reestablish the grades on Alley (no name) between Surrey and Sussex streets from Diamond street southeasterly. Whereas, said resolution was so published for ten days, and the Department of Public Works within ten days after the first publicatio",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich|260",1933,1933,"1933-06-12","ordinance","the-street","passed","Sidewalks on Diamond Street to be narrowed to ten feet","unverified","journalofproceed28sanfrich",1180,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n1180",null,"Ordinance No. 1061, entitled \"Regulating the Width of Sidewalks,\" approved December 18, 1903, be and is hereby amended in accordance with the communication of the Director of Public Works, filed in this office May 20, 1933, by adding thereto a new section to be numbered 1131, to read as follows: Sec",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich|201",1934,1934,"1934-05-28","ordinance","the-street","passed","Street levels set for Poppy Lane between Diamond and Conrad","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",740,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n740",null,"Ordinance No. 12.0714, as follows: Establishing grades on Poppy lane between Diamond and Conrad streets. Be it ordained by the People of the City and County of San Francisco as follows: Section 1. The grades on Poppy lane between Diamond and Conrad streets are hereby established at points hereinafte",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceed82septdecsanfrich/117/5917c77d",1987,1987,"1987-09-28","resolution",null,"passed","Sewer to be restored on Conrad Street between Diamond and Arbor","unverified","journalofproceed82septdecsanfrich",118,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed82septdecsanfrich/page/n117",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2002sanf_1:80/1",2002,2002,"2002-09-30","resolution",null,null,"Resolution proposed to set new parking limits and tow-away zones on several San Francisco streets.","quoted","meetingminutesb2002sanf_1",80,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2002sanf_1/page/n79",null,null,null,null,"P","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesseptdec97sanfrich|67",2002,2002,"2002-09-30","resolution","getting-around",null,"Permit parking added on Castro Street, York Street and Waller Street","quoted","meetingminutesseptdec97sanfrich",80,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesseptdec97sanfrich/page/n79",null,null,null,null,"P","m",0,-1.0]]}