{"id":"qipu:sf/place/block/6728","kind":"block","name":"Assessor block 6728","block":"6728","neighbourhood":"Glen Park","tied_by":"block","named":[],"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1910sanfrich|2053",1910,1910,"1910-12-19","ordinance","the-street","passed","Street levels changed on Folsom Street between Sixteenth and Seventeenth","unverified","journalofproceed1910sanfrich",1330,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1910sanfrich/page/n1325",null,"Ordinance No. 1430 (New Series), entitled, \"Changing and re-establishing the official grades on Folsom street, between Sixteenth and Seventeenth streets.\" A.yes — Supervisors Bancroft, Cutten, Deasy. Havden. Healy. Herget, Hocks, Kelly, Knowles, Lougherv, McLaughlin, Minehan. Murdock. Nelson, O'Dowd",null,null,"p","m",0,2.1],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1913sanfrich|857",1913,1913,"1913-06-30","resolution","the-street",null,"Public Works told to recommend paving Laidley and First Streets","unverified","journalofproceed1913sanfrich",735,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1913sanfrich/page/n735",null,"Resolution No. 10252 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the Board of Public Works is hereby directed to recommend the improvement of the roadway of Laidley street, between Roanoke and Castro streets, where not already done; and the improvement of the roadway of First street, from Brannan stree",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1914sanfrich|1626",1914,1914,"1914-11-02","ordinance","the-street",null,"Laidley Street to be curbed and paved between Miguel and Castro","unverified","journalofproceed1914sanfrich",1357,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1914sanfrich/page/n1357",null,"Ordinance of said Citv and County of San Francisco, BaM work to be performed under the direction of the Board of Public Works, and to be done in accordance with the specifications prepared therefor bv said Board of Public Works, and on file in its oflSce, which said plans nnd specifications are here",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1915sanfrich|660",1915,1915,"1915-04-19","ordinance","the-street",null,"Sidewalk widths on Bemis and Addison Streets set by map","unverified","journalofproceed1915sanfrich",533,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1915sanfrich/page/n524",null,"Ordinance No. 1061, entitled, \"Regulating the width of sidewalks,\" approved December 18th, 1903, be and is hereby amended in accordance with the communication of the Board of Public Works filed in this office April 15, 1915, by adding thereto new sections to be numbered five hundred and ninety-eight",null,null,"p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1918sanfrich|734",1918,1918,"1918-05-27","ordinance","the-street",null,"Sidewalks on Castro Street set at ten feet wide","unverified","journalofproceed1918sanfrich",488,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1918sanfrich/page/n481",null,"Ordinance No. 1061, entitled, \"Regulating the Width of Sidewalks,\" approved December 18, 1903, be and is hereby amended in accordance with the communication of the Board of Public Works, filed in this office May 16, 1918, by adding thereto a new section to be numbered seven hundred and ten, to read ",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich|2572",1926,1926,"1926-11-29","ordinance",null,null,"An ordinance proposed for the corner of Laidley and Roanoke","unverified","journalofproceed21sanfrich",1952,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n1952",null,"Ordinance Southwest Corner of Laidley Street and Roanoke Street. Also, Bill No. 7830,",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich|2573",1926,1926,"1926-11-29","ordinance","land-and-building","passed","Shops allowed for ninety days at Laidley and Roanoke streets","unverified","journalofproceed21sanfrich",1952,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n1952",null,"Ordinance No. 5464 (New Series), the title of which is above recited, is hereby amended as follows : Section 12 of the Use of Property Zone Map, constituting a part of said ordinance, is hereby ordered changed so as to place the southwest corner of Laidley street and Roanoke street, for a distance o",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|2567",1927,1927,"1927-11-07","ordinance","the-street","passed first reading","Sidewalks on Roanoke Street to be set at ten feet; passed first reading only","unverified","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2241,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2241",null,"Ordinance No. 1061, entitled \"Regulating the Width of Sidewalks,\" approved December 18, 1903, be and is hereby amended in accordance with the communication of the Board of Public Works, filed in this office October 19, 1927, by adding thereto a new section to be numbered nine hundred and eightythree",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|2587",1927,1927,"1927-11-07","resolution","the-street","passed","Street levels to be changed on Roanoke Street near Laidley","unverified","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2246,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2246",null,"Resolution No. 99446 (Second Series) of the Board of Public Works, adopted October 21, 1927, and written recommendation of said Board, filed October 24, 1927, to-wit: Roanoke Street. At the intersection of Bemis street, southerly line (for Bemis street), 322 feet. (The same being the present officia",null,null,"p","m",0,2.08],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|2640",1927,1927,"1927-11-21","ordinance","the-street",null,"Sidewalks set at ten feet on Roanoke Street","unverified","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2276,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2276",null,"Ordinance No. 1061, entitled \"Regulating the Width of Sidewalks,\" approved December 18, 1903, be and is hereby amended in accordance with the communication of the Board of Public Works, filed in this office October 19, 1927, by adding thereto a new section to be numbered nine hundred and eightythree",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|2669",1927,1927,"1927-11-21","resolution","the-street","passed","Sidewalk built in front of the Bernal School for $435 (≈ $8,424 in 2026 dollars)","unverified","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2290,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2290",null,"Resolution No. 28078 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the following amounts be and the same are hereby set aside, appropriated and authorized to be expended out of the hereinafter designated funds for the following purposes, to-wit: Street Work in Front of City Property— Budget Item No. 35. ",null,null,"p","m",0,-0.96],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|2927",1927,1927,"1927-12-19","ordinance","public-money",null,"Stone sidewalks to be laid on Laidley, Chenery and Montcalm streets","unverified","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2453,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2453",null,"Ordinance of 1918 of said City and County of San Francisco, does hereby determine and declare that the assessment to be imposed for the said contemplated improvements, respectively, may be paid in three installments; that the period of time after the payment of the first installment when each of the",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|2971",1927,1927,"1927-12-27","ordinance","public-money",null,"Stone sidewalks to be laid on Laidley, Chenery and Montcalm streets","unverified","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2480,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2480",null,"Ordinance of 1918 of said City and County of San Francisco, does hereby determine and declare that the assessment to be imposed for the said contemplated improvements, respectively, may be paid . in three installments; that the period of time after the payment of the first installment when each of t",null,null,"p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich|495",1928,1928,"1928-02-20","ordinance","the-street",null,"Street levels to change on Woolsey Street near Charter Oak Avenue","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",322,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n322",null,"Ordinance No. (New Series), as follows: Changing and reestablishing the official grades on Woolsey street between Charter Oak avenue and a line parallel with and 100 feet westerly therefrom. Wliereas, the Board of Supervisors, on the written recommendation of the Board of Public Works, did. on the 1",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich|584",1928,1928,"1928-03-01","ordinance","the-street","passed","Street levels changed on Vallejo Street between Kearny and Montgomery","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",372,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n372",null,"Ordinance No. 7940 (New Series), entitled \"Changing and reestablishing the official grades on Vallejo street between Kearny and Montgomery streets.\" Ayes — Supervisors Colman, Deasy, Havenner, Hayden, Kent, McGovern, Marks, Powers, Roncovieri, Schmidt, Shannon, Stanton, Suhr, Toner — 14. Absent — Su",null,null,"p","m",0,1.95],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich|1850",1929,1929,"1929-07-15","ordinance","the-street","passed first reading","Surfacing and drainage to be ordered for the Laidley Street slide; passed first reading only","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",1480,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n1480",null,"Ordinance No. (New Series), as follows: Ordering the surfacing and drainage of the Laidley street slide between Mateo and Roanoke streets; approving and adopting plans and specifications prepared therefor; authorizing the Board of Public Works to enter into contract for doing the same. Be it ordaine",null,null,"p","m",0,2.04],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich|44",1931,1931,"1931-06-29","ordinance","the-street","passed first reading","City to take over new roadways on Bright, Duncan and Gates","quoted","journalofproceed26part2sanfrich",43,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich/page/n38",null,"Ordinance No. (New Series), as follows: Providing for conditional acceptance of the roadway of Bright street between Randolph and Sargent streets; Barneveld avenue between Gaven and Sweeny streets; Duncan street between Douglass street and Hoffman avenue; Franconia street between Peralta avenue and ",null,null,"p","m",0,2.14],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich|386",1936,1936,"1936-06-22","resolution","the-street",null,"Bemis Street levels to change between Castro and Mateo streets","unverified","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1091,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1091",null,"Resolution No. 2644, as follows: Resolved, That it is the intention of the Board of Supervisors to change and establish grades on Bemis street between Castro street and Mateo street as shown on Map entitled \"Grade Map of Bemis Street, Between Castro and Mateo Streets,\" approved by Director of Works ",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sq:514c1dd504",1936,1936,"1936-06-22",null,null,"passed","Board intends to change Bemis Street grades between Castro and Mateo streets","unverified","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1091,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1091",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich|525",1936,1936,"1936-08-31","ordinance","the-street",null,"Street levels reset on Bemis Street between Castro and Mateo","unverified","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1533,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1533",null,"Ordinance No. 12.072224, as follows: Changing and reestablishing the official grades on Bemis street between Castro street and Mateo street. Whereas, the Board of Supervisors, on the written recommendation of the Director of Public Works, did, on the 22nd day of June, 1936, by",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich|526",1936,1936,"1936-08-31","resolution","the-street",null,"Street levels changed on Bemis Street between Castro and Mateo","unverified","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1533,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1533",null,"Resolution No. 2644, declare its intention to change and reestablish the grades on Bemis street between Castro street and Mateo street; Whereas, said resolution was so published for ten days, and the Director of Public Works within ten days after the first publication of said resolution of intention",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceed31sanfrich/1533/d0b5254b",1936,1936,"1936-08-31","ordinance",null,null,"Street levels reset on Bemis Street between Castro and Mateo","unverified","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1533,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1533",null,"Changing Grades on Bemis Street Between Castro Street and Mateo Street.",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich|540",1936,1936,"1936-09-14","ordinance","the-street","passed","Street levels reset on Bemis Street between Castro and Mateo","unverified","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1579,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1579",null,"Ordinance No. 12.072224, as follows: Changing and reestablishing the official grades on Bemis street between Castro street and Mateo street. Whereas, the Board of Supervisors, on the written recommendation of the Director of Public Works, did, on the 22nd day of June, 1936, by",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich|541",1936,1936,"1936-09-14","resolution","the-street",null,"Change of street levels intended on Bemis between Castro and Mateo","unverified","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1579,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1579",null,"Resolution No. 2644, declare its intention to change and reestablish the grades on Bemis street between Castro street and Mateo street;",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sq:e8dc9e5e49",1936,1936,"1936-09-14",null,null,"passed","Street grades changed on Bemis Street between Castro and Mateo streets","unverified","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1579,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1579",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed44sanfrich|111",1949,1949,"1949-03-07","ordinance","running-the-city","passed first reading","Palou Avenue improvement backed with about $600 (≈ $8,494 in 2026 dollars) in city aid; passed first reading only.","quoted","journalofproceed44sanfrich",187,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed44sanfrich/page/n184",null,"Ordinance No (Series of 1939). Passed for Second Reading by the following vote: Ayes: Supervisors Christopher, Fazackerley, Gallagher, Halley, Lewis, MacPhee, Mancuso, McMurray, Mead, J. Joseph Sullivan, John J. Sullivan— 11. Ordering the Improvement of Palou Avenue (NE^) Between Industrial and Selb",null,null,"p","m",0,1.72],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceed68sanfrich/516/f727dffc",1973,1973,"1973-05-14","resolution",null,"passed","No stopping on Bemis Street; hour limit dropped on Natoma Street","unverified","journalofproceed68sanfrich",516,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n516",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich:349/3",2006,2006,null,"hearing","whats-being-built",null,"Appeal by [name withheld] against the Planning Department's exemption from environmental review for 538 Laidley Street was heard.","quoted","meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich",349,"https://archive.org/details/meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich/page/n348",null,null,null,null,"P","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich:350/1",2006,2006,null,"motion","whats-being-built","passed","Affirmed the Planning Department's environmental exemption for a single-family house at 538 Laidley Street.","quoted","meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich",350,"https://archive.org/details/meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich/page/n349",null,null,null,null,"P","a",0,2.19],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich:350/2",2006,2006,null,"motion","whats-being-built","tabled","Motion to disapprove the environmental exemption for 538 Laidley Street was tabled, so it did not proceed.","quoted","meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich",350,"https://archive.org/details/meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich/page/n349",null,null,null,null,"P","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich:350/3",2006,2006,null,"motion",null,"passed","Clerk directed to prepare findings on the appeal of the environmental exemption for 538 Laidley Street.","quoted","meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich",350,"https://archive.org/details/meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich/page/n349",null,null,null,null,"P","a",0,1.2],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich:351/1",2006,2006,null,"motion",null,"passed","Board directed the Clerk to prepare findings on the appeal of the 538 Laidley Street environmental exemption.","quoted","meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich",351,"https://archive.org/details/meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich/page/n350",null,null,null,null,"P","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:meetingminutesb2006sanf_3/351/30d24aa9",2006,2006,"2006-12-12","motion",null,null,"Findings ordered on the 538 Laidley Street exemption","unverified","meetingminutesb2006sanf_3",352,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2006sanf_3/page/n351",null,null,null,null,"P","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2006sanf_3:352/1",2006,2006,"2006-12-12","motion","whats-being-built","passed","The Board affirmed the Planning Department's finding that the single-family house at 538 Laidley Street is exempt from environmental review.","quoted","meetingminutesb2006sanf_3",352,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2006sanf_3/page/n351",null,null,null,null,"P","a",0,2.07],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2006sanf_3:353/1",2006,2006,"2006-12-12","motion",null,"passed","Board directed the Clerk to prepare findings on the appeal of the 538 Laidley Street environmental exemption.","quoted","meetingminutesb2006sanf_3",353,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2006sanf_3/page/n352",null,null,null,null,"P","a",0,1.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2006sanf_3|254",2006,2006,"2006-12-12","motion","running-the-city","passed","A continuance vote with no subject on this page","quoted","meetingminutesb2006sanf_3",351,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2006sanf_3/page/n350",null,null,null,null,"P","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2006sanf_3|256",2006,2006,"2006-12-12","motion","running-the-city","tabled","An approval vote with no subject on this page","quoted","meetingminutesb2006sanf_3",352,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2006sanf_3/page/n351",null,null,null,null,"P","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2006sanf_3|258",2006,2006,"2006-12-12","motion","running-the-city","passed","A tabling vote with no subject on this page","quoted","meetingminutesb2006sanf_3",352,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2006sanf_3/page/n351",null,null,null,null,"P","m",0,0.47],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesd2006sanf_0:378/4",2006,2006,"2006-12-12","hearing","whats-being-built",null,"[name withheld] appealed the Planning Department's environmental exemption for a three-story house at 538 Laidley Street; the public hearing was closed.","quoted","meetingminutesd2006sanf_0",378,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesd2006sanf_0/page/n377",null,null,null,null,"P","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesd2006sanf_0:379/1",2006,2006,"2006-12-12","motion","whats-being-built","passed","The Planning Department's environmental exemption for the 538 Laidley Street house project was affirmed, so the project proceeds without full review.","quoted","meetingminutesd2006sanf_0",379,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesd2006sanf_0/page/n378",null,null,null,null,"P","a",0,2.44],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesd2006sanf_0:379/2",2006,2006,"2006-12-12","motion","whats-being-built","tabled","A motion to disapprove the Planning Department's environmental exemption for the 538 Laidley Street project was tabled.","quoted","meetingminutesd2006sanf_0",379,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesd2006sanf_0/page/n378",null,null,null,null,"P","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesd2006sanf_0:379/3",2006,2006,"2006-12-12","motion",null,"passed","Clerk of the Board was directed to prepare findings on the appeal of the environmental exemption for 538 Laidley Street.","quoted","meetingminutesd2006sanf_0",379,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesd2006sanf_0/page/n378",null,null,null,null,"P","a",0,1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:meetingjanmar2007minutes102sanfrich/15/ccd3572e",2007,2007,"2007-01-09","motion",null,"passed","Environmental exemption upheld for the 538 Laidley Street project","unverified","meetingjanmar2007minutes102sanfrich",18,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjanmar2007minutes102sanfrich/page/n15",null,null,null,null,"P","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjanmar2007minutes102sanfrich:18/2",2007,2007,"2007-01-09","motion","whats-being-built","passed","Board affirmed the Planning Department's finding that the project at 538 Laidley Street is exempt from CEQA review.","quoted","meetingjanmar2007minutes102sanfrich",18,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjanmar2007minutes102sanfrich/page/n15",null,null,null,null,"P","a",0,2.19],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2007sanf:16/2",2007,2007,"2007-01-09","motion","whats-being-built","passed","Board affirmed the Planning Department's CEQA exemption for the project at 538 Laidley Street.","quoted","meetingminutesbo2007sanf",16,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2007sanf/page/n15",null,null,null,null,"P","a",0,2.19],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesdr2007sanf:9/2",2007,2007,"2007-01-09","motion","whats-being-built","passed","Board affirmed the Planning Department's finding that the project at 538 Laidley Street is exempt from CEQA environmental review.","quoted","meetingminutesdr2007sanf",9,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesdr2007sanf/page/n8",null,null,null,null,"P","a",0,2.32],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sd:256eeabd1a",2007,2007,"2007-01-09",null,"appeals","passed","538 Laidley Street project cleared without full environmental review","unverified",null,null,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjanmar2007minutes102sanfrich/page/n15/mode/1up",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,0.66]]}