{"id":"qipu:sf/place/block/6730","kind":"block","name":"Assessor block 6730","block":"6730","neighbourhood":"Glen Park","tied_by":"block","named":[],"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1912sanfrich|1222",1912,1912,"1912-10-21","ordinance","the-street",null,"Sidewalk widths fixed on Ocean Avenue","unverified","journalofproceed1912sanfrich",1052,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1912sanfrich/page/n1052",null,"Ordinance No. 1061, entitled, \"Regulating the widths of sidewalks,\" approved December 18, 1908, by amending Section 218 thereof, the provisions of which fix the width of sidewalks on Ocean avenue. Ayes — Supervisors\" Bancroft, Caglieri, Andrew J. Gallagher, George E. Gallagher, Giannini, Hayden, Hil",null,null,"p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceed1913sanfrich/1358/1b3ddf47",1913,1913,"1913-12-01","resolution",null,"passed","G. W. McGinn given thirty more days paving Diamond Street","unverified","journalofproceed1913sanfrich",1358,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1913sanfrich/page/n1358",null,"Extensions of Time — Diamond street, between Surrey and Sussex streets.",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1917sanfrich|1472",1917,1917,"1917-09-04","resolution","the-street","passed","Flinn & Treacy given sixty more days on Diamond Street","quoted","journalofproceed1917sanfrich",1409,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1917sanfrich/page/n1409",null,"Resolution No. 14782 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That Flinn & Treacy are hereby granted an extension of sixty days from September 18, 1917, within which to complete contract for the improvement of Diamond street, between Surrey street and a line 198 feet southerly therefrom. This first exten",null,null,"p","m",0,1.86],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1917sanfrich|1657",1917,1917,"1917-10-22","ordinance","the-street",null,"Sidewalks on Van Buren Street set at eight feet wide","unverified","journalofproceed1917sanfrich",1599,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1917sanfrich/page/n1599",null,"Ordinance No, 1061, entitled, \"Regulating the Width of Sidewalks,\" approved December 18, 1903, be and is hereby amended in accordance with the communication of the Board of Public Works, filed in this office October 11, 1917, by adding thereto a new section to be numbered six hundred and ninety, to ",null,null,"p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1917sanfrich|1889",1917,1917,"1917-12-10","ordinance","the-street",null,"Street levels to be changed on Balboa Street near La Playa","unverified","journalofproceed1917sanfrich",1769,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1917sanfrich/page/n1769",null,"Ordinance No. — (New Series), entitled, \"Changing and re-establishing the official grades on Balboa street, between Forty-eighth avenue and the westerly line of La Playa.\" Also. Bill No. 4783,",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1918sanfrich|438",1918,1918,"1918-03-25","resolution","the-street",null,"Street levels to change on Sussex Street and Van Buren Street","unverified","journalofproceed1918sanfrich",288,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1918sanfrich/page/n285",null,"Resolution No. 58081 (Second Series) of the Board of Public Works adopted March 20, 1918, and written recommendation of said Board, filed March 21, 1918, to-wit: On Sussex street between Conrad and Diamond streets; on Van Buren street between Sussex street and a point southerly therefrom. The Board ",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1918sanfrich|704",1918,1918,"1918-05-20","ordinance","the-street","passed first reading","Street levels to be changed on Sussex and Van Buren Streets","quoted","journalofproceed1918sanfrich",465,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1918sanfrich/page/n458",null,"Ordinance No. (New Series), entitled, \"Changing and re-establishing the official grades on Sussex street between the westerly line of Conrad street and the easterly line of Diamond street; on Van Buren street between Sussex street and the beginning of the first curve southerly therefrom; and on an a",null,null,"p","m",0,1.95],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1918sanfrich|1057",1918,1918,"1918-08-05","resolution","doing-business","passed","Albion Erickson allowed to blast while grading on Diamond Street","quoted","journalofproceed1918sanfrich",782,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1918sanfrich/page/n773",null,"Resolution No. (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That Albion Erickson is hereby granted permission, revocable at will of the Board of Supervisors, to explode, blasts while grading property situate on the east side of Diamond street between Chcnery and Surrey streets, provided said permittee shall ",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1919sanfrich|197",1919,1919,"1919-03-10","ordinance","the-street","passed","Street levels changed on Coso Avenue and Lundy's Lane","quoted","journalofproceed1919sanfrich",182,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1919sanfrich/page/n182",null,"Ordinance No. 4798 (New Series), entitled \"Changing and re-establishing the official grades on Coso avenue, Bernal avenue, Montezuma street and Lundy's Lane.\" Ayes — Supervisors Brandon, Deasy, Hayden, Hilmer, Hynes, Kortick, Mc- Leran, McSheehy, Nelson, Schmitz, Suhr, Wolfe— 12. Absent — Supervisor",null,null,"p","m",0,1.95],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1919sanfrich|198",1919,1919,"1919-03-10","ordinance","the-street","passed","Street levels changed on Van Buren Street between Sussex and Surrey","unverified","journalofproceed1919sanfrich",182,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1919sanfrich/page/n182",null,"Ordinance No. 4799 (New Series), entitled \"Changing and re-establishing the official grades on Van Buren street between Sussex and Surrey streets.\" Ayes — Supervisors Brandon, Deasy, Havden, Hilmer, Hynes, Kortick, Mc- Leran, McSheehy, Nelson, Schmitz, Suhr, Wolfe— 12. Absent— Supervisors Gallagher,",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sq:d2a9dc1f09",1919,1919,"1919-03-10",null,null,"passed","Grades on Van Buren Street between Sussex and Surrey changed","unverified","journalofproceed1919sanfrich",182,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1919sanfrich/page/n182",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1921sanfrich|739",1921,1921,"1921-08-08","resolution","the-street",null,"City Construction Company given 90 more days on Twenty-sixth Street","unverified","journalofproceed1921sanfrich",756,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1921sanfrich/page/n755",null,"Resolution No. 19136 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That City Construction Company is hereby granted the following extension of time to complete street work, viz. : Ninety days' time from and after August 22, 1921, within which to complete contract for the improvement of Tvv'enty-sixth street f",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1921sanfrich|1073",1921,1921,"1921-11-07","resolution","the-street","passed","City Construction Company given sixty more days at Diamond and Surrey","unverified","journalofproceed1921sanfrich",1048,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1921sanfrich/page/n1047",null,"Resolution No. 19404 (New Series), as follows: Resolved. That the City Construction Co. is hereby granted an extension of sixty days' time, from and after November 12, 1921, within which to complete contract for the improvement of the crossing of Diamond street and Surrey street. This extension of t",null,null,"p","m",0,1.56],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1923sanfrich|1434",1923,1923,"1923-10-08","ordinance","public-money",null,"Diamond Street to be paved between Chenery and Surrey streets","unverified","journalofproceed1923sanfrich",1182,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1923sanfrich/page/n1182",null,"Ordinance of 1918 of said City and County of San Francisco, does hereby determine and declare that the assessment to be imposed for the said contemplated improvements, respectively, may be paid in five installments; that the period of time after the payment of the first installment when each of the ",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1924sanfrich|483",1924,1924,"1924-03-24","ordinance","public-money",null,"Van Buren Street paved between Surrey and Sussex streets","unverified","journalofproceed1924sanfrich",343,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1924sanfrich/page/n342",null,"Ordinance of 1918 of said City and County of San Francisco, does hereby determine and declare that the assessment to be imposed for the said contemplated improvements, respectively, may be paid in ten installments; that the period of time after the payment of the first installment when each of the s",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1924sanfrich|399",1924,1924,"1924-04-07","resolution","the-street",null,"City Construction Company gets sixty more days on Surrey Street","quoted","journalofproceed1924sanfrich",267,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1924sanfrich/page/n266",null,"Resolution No. 22203 (New Series), as follows: - Resolved, That the City Construction Company is hereby granted the following extensions of time to complete street work, viz.: Sixty days' time from and after February 22, 1924. within which to complete contract for the improveof Surrey street from Ca",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1924sanfrich|758",1924,1924,"1924-05-05","resolution","the-street",null,"City Construction Company gets thirty more days on Surrey Street","unverified","journalofproceed1924sanfrich",545,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1924sanfrich/page/n544",null,"Resolution No. 22430 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the City Construction Company is hereby granted an extension of thirty days' time from and after April 22, 1924, to complete the following public contracts, viz.: Surrey street between Castro and Diamond streets. Diamond street between Ch",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1924sanfrich|959",1924,1924,"1924-06-16","resolution","the-street",null,"City Construction given sixty more days on Surrey and Diamond streets","unverified","journalofproceed1924sanfrich",799,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1924sanfrich/page/n798",null,"Resolution No. 22552 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That City Construction Company is hereby granted the following extensions of time to complete street work, viz.: Sixty days' time from and after May 22, 1924, to complete the improvement of Surrey street between Diamond street and a line 275.9",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1924sanfrich|1296",1924,1924,"1924-08-04","resolution","the-street",null,"City Construction Company given ninety more days on Farallones Street","quoted","journalofproceed1924sanfrich",1066,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1924sanfrich/page/n1065",null,"Resolution No. 22760 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That City Construction Company is hereby granted the following extensions of time to complete the improvement of streets, viz.: Ninety days' time from and after .July 27, 1924, within which to complete the improvement of Farallones sheet betwe",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1924sanfrich|1957",1924,1924,"1924-11-10","resolution","running-the-city","passed","City Construction's appeal on the Surrey Street assessment denied","unverified","journalofproceed1924sanfrich",1515,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1924sanfrich/page/n1512",null,"Resolution No. 23161 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the apoeal of City Construction Company from the assessment issued for the improvement of Surrey street between Diamond street and a line at ri?ht angles with the northwesterly line of Surrey street, at an angle* point distant along said ",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.46],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1924sanfrich|2087",1924,1924,"1924-11-24","resolution","public-money","passed","$300 (≈ $5,911 in 2026 dollars) set aside to improve Surrey Street near Diamond Street","unverified","journalofproceed1924sanfrich",1591,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1924sanfrich/page/n1588",null,"Resolution No. 23226 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, Thai the sum of $300 be and the same is hereby set aside, appropriated and authorized to be expended out of Budget Item No. 80, \"Emergency Repairs to Streets, etc.\", for the improvement of Surrey street between Diamond street and a point 275.9",null,null,"p","m",0,1.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1925sanfrich|338",1925,1925,"1925-02-16","ordinance","doing-business",null,"Farrar & Carlin may blast between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m.","unverified","journalofproceed1925sanfrich",194,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1925sanfrich/page/n193",null,"Ordinance No. 1204; provided, also, that said blasts shall be exploded only between the hours of 7 a. m. and 6 p. m. and that the work of blasting shall be performed to the satisfaction of the Board of Public Works, and that if any of the conditions of this resolution be violated by said Farrar & Ca",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1925sanfrich|2100",1925,1925,"1925-08-31","resolution","running-the-city",null,"City Construction Company's appeal over Diamond Street charges is denied","unverified","journalofproceed1925sanfrich",1348,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1925sanfrich/page/n1347",null,"Resolution No. 24437 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the appeal of City Construction Company filed January 26, 1925, from the assessment issued by the Board of Public Works for the improvement of Diamond street between Chenery and Surrey streets be and the same is hereby denied and the asse",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sd:c5a6d8cc38",1925,1925,"1925-08-31",null,"appeals","passed","Diamond Street improvement charges upheld after company's appeal","unverified",null,null,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1925sanfrich/page/n1347/mode/1up",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,0.66],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|204",1927,1927,"1927-01-24","ordinance","the-street","passed first reading","Sidewalks on Diamond Street to be set at eight feet wide; passed first reading only","unverified","journalofproceed22sanfrich",156,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n156",null,"Ordinance No. 1061, entitled \"Regulating the Width of Sidewalks,\" approved December IS, 1903, be and is hereby amended in accordance with the communication of the Board of Public Works filed in this office January 11, 1927, by adding thereto a new section, to be numbered nine hundred and fortynine, ",null,null,"p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|862",1927,1927,"1927-04-11","ordinance","the-street","passed first reading","Street levels to be changed on Cayuga and Santa Rosa avenues","unverified","journalofproceed22sanfrich",648,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n648",null,"Ordinance No. (New Series), entitled \"Changing and reestablishing the official grades on Cayuga avenue between the northeasterly line of Santa Rosa avenue and Santa Ynez avenue; on Santa Rosa avenue between Alemany and Capistrano avenues; on Bauer street between Alemany and Cayuga avenues, and on Sa",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|898",1927,1927,"1927-04-18","ordinance","the-street",null,"Street levels changed on Sussex Street near Diamond","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",688,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n688",null,"Ordinance No. 7506 New Series), as follows: Changing and reestablishing the fficial grades on Sussex street between Conrad street and the westerly curb line of Diamond street. Whereas, the Board of Supervisors, on the written recommendation of the Board of Public Works, did, on the 28th day of Janua",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|1134",1927,1927,"1927-05-16","resolution","the-street",null,"Street levels changed on Sussex, Bemis and Diamond streets","unverified","journalofproceed22sanfrich",892,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n892",null,"Resolution No. 26859 (New Series), declare its intention to change and reestablish the grades on Sussex street between the westerly line of Diamond street and the easterly line of Castro street; on Bemis street between the westerly line of Castro street and a line at right angles to the northerly li",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich|169",1928,1928,"1928-01-23","resolution","the-street",null,"Small paving jobs paid for on Diamond, Bluxome and Elizabeth streets","unverified","journalofproceed23sanfrich",125,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n125",null,"Resolution No. 28360 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the following amounts be and the same are hereby set aside and appropriated out of County Road Fund for construction in the following streets, towit: Diamond street, Surrey and Sussex streets, $50. Cortland avenue and Folsom street, $75. ",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich|2628",1929,1929,"1929-11-04","ordinance","the-street",null,"Sidewalks on Sussex Street set at ten feet wide","unverified","journalofproceed24sanfrich",2198,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n2198",null,"Ordinance No. 1061, entitled \"Regulating the Width of Sidewalks, approved December 18, 1903, be and is hereby amended in accordance with the communication of the Board of Public Works, filed in this office October 12, 1929, by amending Section 947 thereof, to read as follows: Section 947. The width ",null,null,"p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed27sanfrich|480",1932,1932,"1932-09-06","resolution","the-street",null,"Lane west of Castro Street named Poppy Lane","unverified","journalofproceed27sanfrich",1588,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed27sanfrich/page/n1588",null,"Resolution No. 408, as follows: Resolved, That the name of that certain lane westerly from Castro street between Moffitt street and Sussex street to Diamond street, and westerly from Diamond street between Arbor street and Susssx street to Conrad street, be and is hereby named \"Poppy Lane.\" Ayes — S",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich|125",1933,1933,"1933-04-10","ordinance","the-street","passed","Street levels changed on the unnamed alley between Surrey and Sussex","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",587,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n587",null,"Ordinance No. 12.072210, as follows: Changing and reestablishing the official grades on Alley (no name) between Surrey and Sussex streets from Diamond street southeasterly. Whereas, the Board of Supervisors, on the written recommendation of the Department of Public Works, did, on the 31st day of Jan",null,null,"p","m",0,1.95],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich|126",1933,1933,"1933-04-10","resolution","the-street",null,"Street levels to be set on the alley off Diamond Street","unverified","journalofproceed28sanfrich",587,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n587",null,"Resolution No. 609, declare its intention to change and reestablish the grades on Alley (no name) between Surrey and Sussex streets from Diamond street southeasterly. Whereas, said resolution was so published for ten days, and the Department of Public Works within ten days after the first publicatio",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich|269",1984,1984,"1984-06-18","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Retaining wall allowed in the service road at 208 Surrey Street","quoted","journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich",737,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich/page/n734",null,null,null,null,"B,P","a",0,1.42],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich/734/84ec1d41",1984,1984,"1984-06-18","resolution",null,"passed","Retaining wall allowed in the service road at 208 Surrey Street","unverified","journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich",737,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich/page/n734",null,null,null,null,"P","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sd:43b6631b7b",1984,1984,"1984-06-18",null,"appeals","passed","Concrete retaining wall allowed on service road by 208 Surrey Street","unverified",null,null,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich/page/n734/mode/1up",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,0.66]]}