{"id":"qipu:sf/place/block/7009","kind":"block","name":"Assessor block 7009","block":"7009","neighbourhood":"Oceanview/Merced/Ingleside","tied_by":"block","named":[],"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1924sanfrich|1125",1924,1924,"1924-07-14","ordinance","the-street",null,"Bright Street buildings must be set back ten feet","unverified","journalofproceed1924sanfrich",918,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1924sanfrich/page/n917",null,"Ordinance No. 5636 (New Series), setback lines are hereby established as follows: Along the westerly side of Bright street, commencing at a point 100 feet northerly from Garfield avenue and running thence northerly to Hollow av avenue, said set-back line to be 10 feet; along the east side of Bright ",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1924sanfrich|1628",1924,1924,"1924-09-29","ordinance","the-street","passed","Buildings on Garfield Street must sit ten feet back","unverified","journalofproceed1924sanfrich",1333,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1924sanfrich/page/n1332",null,"Ordinance No. 5636 (New Series), setback lines are hereby established as follows: Along the northerly side of Garfield street between Orizaba avenue and Head street, said set-back line to be 10 feet. Along the northerly side of Garfield street between Head street and Ramsell street, said set-back li",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1925sanfrich|2885",1925,1925,"1925-12-07","ordinance","the-street",null,"How far back buildings must sit set on Bright Street","unverified","journalofproceed1925sanfrich",1826,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1925sanfrich/page/n1823",null,"Ordinance No. 5636 (New Series), setback lines are hereby established as follows: Along both sides of Head street, commencing at points 100 feet northerly from Shields street and running thence nor'iierly to points 100 feet southerly from Garfield street, said set-back lines to be 10 feet. Along bot",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich|359",1926,1926,"1926-02-23","ordinance","the-street",null,"How far back buildings sit fixed on Shields and Farallones streets","unverified","journalofproceed21sanfrich",270,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n270",null,"Ordinance No. follows: (New Series), as follows: Along Doth sides 0f Shields street Establishing set-back lines along between Head street and Orizaba portions of Shields street, Faralavenue, said set-back lines to be lones street, Eighteenth avenue, 10 feet. Nineteenth avenue and Twentieth Along the",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich|459",1926,1926,"1926-03-01","ordinance","the-street","passed","Buildings on Shields and Farallones streets may have to sit back","unverified","journalofproceed21sanfrich",326,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n326",null,"Ordinance No. 5636 (New Series), approved May 18, 1922, as follows : Along both sides of Shields street between Head street and Orizaba avenue, said set-back lines to be 10 feet. Along the northerly side of Farallones street commencing at a point 200 feet easterly from Capitol avenue and running the",null,null,"b,p","m",0,1.74],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich|751",1926,1926,"1926-03-29","ordinance","the-street",null,"Buildings on Shields Street must sit ten feet back","unverified","journalofproceed21sanfrich",491,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n491",null,"Ordinance No. 5636 (New Series), setback lines are hereby established as follows: Along both sides of Shields street between Head street and Orizaba avenue, said set-back lines to be 10 feet. Along the northerly side of Farallones street, commencing at a point 200 feet easterly from Capitol avenue a",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich|872",1926,1926,"1926-04-05","ordinance","the-street","passed","Buildings on Nineteenth Avenue between Rivera and Santiago streets set back","unverified","journalofproceed21sanfrich",550,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n550",null,"Ordinance No. 5636 (New Series), setback lines are hereby established as follows: Along both sides of Shields street between Head street and Orizaba avenue, said set-back lines to be 10 feet. Along the northerly side of Farallones street, commencing at a point 200 feet easterly from Capitol avenue a",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sq:8dd75f68b7",1926,1926,"1926-04-05",null,null,"passed","Buildings on Shields Street set back ten feet between Head and Orizaba","unverified","journalofproceed21sanfrich",550,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n550",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich|924",1926,1926,"1926-04-12","ordinance","the-street","passed","Buildings on Shields Street must sit ten feet back","unverified","journalofproceed21sanfrich",575,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n575",null,"Ordinance No. 5636 (New Series), setback lines are hereby established as follows: Along both sides of Shields street between Head street and Orizaba avenue, said set-back lines to be 10 feet.",null,null,"b,p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sq:ec1b63eaa2",1926,1926,"1926-04-12",null,null,"passed","Buildings on Shields Street must sit ten feet back","unverified","journalofproceed21sanfrich",575,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n575",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich|2567",1926,1926,"1926-11-29","ordinance","the-street",null,"Buildings on Garfield Street no longer have to sit back","unverified","journalofproceed21sanfrich",1952,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n1952",null,"Ordinance No. 7012 (New Series) as establishes set-back lines along portions of Garfield street. Be it ordained by the People of the City and County of San Francisco as follows: Section 1. So much of",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceed24sanfrich/1806/45c5b0bf",1929,1929,"1929-09-03","ordinance",null,"passed","Street levels set on Grafton Avenue, Garfield and Bright Streets","unverified","journalofproceed24sanfrich",1806,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n1806",null,"Establishing Grades, Grafton Avenue, Garfield and Bright Streets.",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich|2217",1929,1929,"1929-09-10","resolution","the-street",null,"Street levels to be changed on Grafton Avenue and Bright Street","unverified","journalofproceed24sanfrich",1837,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n1837",null,"Resolution No. 107455 (Second Series) of the Board of Public Works, adopted August 19, 1929, and written recommendation of said Board filed August 19, 1929, to-wit: On Grafton avenue between Orizaba avenue and Bright street, on Garfield street between Bright street and Head street, on Bright street ",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceed24sanfrich/1946/3a2cd32e",1929,1929,"1929-09-23","resolution",null,"passed","Parts of Garfield Street to be closed near Orizaba Avenue","unverified","journalofproceed24sanfrich",1946,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n1946",null,"Closing and Abandoning Certain Portions of Garfield Street.",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed25part3sanfrich|33",1930,1930,"1930-08-04","resolution","the-street",null,"Part of Garfield Street between Head and Orizaba to be closed","unverified","journalofproceed25part3sanfrich",33,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed25part3sanfrich/page/n32",null,"Resolution Xo. 31451 (New Series), declared its intention to close and abandon certain portions of Garfield street lying between Head street and Orizaba avenue, in the City and County of San Francisco, and hereinafter more particularly described; and Whereas, proper notice of said resolution and of ",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed25part3sanfrich|78",1930,1930,"1930-08-11","ordinance","the-street",null,"Street levels reset on Grafton, Garfield and Bright streets","unverified","journalofproceed25part3sanfrich",64,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed25part3sanfrich/page/n63",null,"Ordinance No. 8820 (New Series), as follows: Changing and reestablishing grades on Grafton avenue between Orizaba avenue and Bright street; on Garfield street between Bright street and Head street; on Bright street between Garfield street and a line parallel with Shields street and 395.90 feet north",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed25part3sanfrich|155",1930,1930,"1930-08-25","resolution","the-street","passed","Grade map approved for Grafton Avenue, Garfield Street and Bright Street","unverified","journalofproceed25part3sanfrich",152,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed25part3sanfrich/page/n151",null,"Resolution No. 107455 (Second Series), approve a map showing the proposed change and establishment of grades on Grafton avenue between Orizaba avenue and Bright street, on Garfield street between Bright street and Head street, and on Bright street between Garfield street and a line parallel with Shi",null,null,"p","m",0,1.94],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed25part3sanfrich|773",1930,1930,"1930-12-01","resolution","the-street",null,"Acacia Street to be renamed Tocoloma Avenue and Grafton extension to be renamed Garfield Street; sent to committee","unverified","journalofproceed25part3sanfrich",817,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed25part3sanfrich/page/n816",null,"Resolution No. 112061 (Second Series) of the Board of Public Works: Acacia street from a point north of Blanken avenue to a point south from Lathrop avenue. Change to Tocoloma avenue. Grafton avenue extension between Orizaba avenue and Bright street. Change to Garfield street. Passed for Printing. T",null,null,"p","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich|1158",1931,1931,"1931-12-21","resolution","the-street",null,"Map approved of land charged for the Garfield Street improvement","unverified","journalofproceed26part2sanfrich",1237,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich/page/n1212",null,"Resolution No. 35532 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That that certain diagram entitled \"Map showing lands benefited by, and to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses of the improvement of Garfield street between Head street and Orizaba avenue,\" approved by the Board of Public Works,",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich|1159",1931,1931,"1931-12-21","resolution","public-money","passed","Map approved of land charged for the Garfield Street improvement","quoted","journalofproceed26part2sanfrich",1237,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich/page/n1212",null,"Resolution No. 115915 (Second Series), December 4, 1931, showing the assessment district for the improvement of Garfield street from Head street to Orizaba avenue, be and the same is hereby approved. Ayes — Supervisors Andriano, Breyer, Canepa, Colman, Gallagher, Garrity, Havenner, Hayden, McSheehy,",null,null,"p","m",0,2.22],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich|1213",1931,1931,"1931-12-29","ordinance","public-money",null,"Garfield Street to be graded, sewered and paved to Head Street","unverified","journalofproceed26part2sanfrich",1426,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich/page/n1401",null,"Ordinance of 1918 of said City and County of San Francisco, does hereby determine and declare that the assessment to be imposed for the said contemplated improvements, respectively, may be paid in twenty installments; that the period of time after the time of the payment of the first installment whe",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed27sanfrich|481",1932,1932,"1932-09-06","resolution","doing-business","passed","Union Paving Company given thirty more days on Shields Street","quoted","journalofproceed27sanfrich",1588,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed27sanfrich/page/n1588",null,"Resolution No. 409, as follows: Resolved, That, in accordance with the recommendation of the Department of Public Works, the Union Paving Company is hereby granted an extension of thirty days' time from and after September 13, 1932, within which to complete the improvement of Shields street between ",null,null,"p","m",0,1.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed27sanfrich|591",1932,1932,"1932-11-21","ordinance","public-money","passed","City puts $3,300 (≈ $81,161 in 2026 dollars) into Laidley Street and $4,000 (≈ $98,377 in 2026 dollars) into Garfield Street","quoted","journalofproceed27sanfrich",1913,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed27sanfrich/page/n1913",null,"Ordinance No. 9.0513, as follows: Appropriating out of County Road Fund, for improvement of Laidley street from Thirtieth to Noe streets, $3,300, and for Garfield street from Head street to Orizaba avenue the sum of $4,000, as City's contribution. Be it ordained by the People of the City and County ",null,null,"p","m",0,1.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sd:761797499d",1932,1932,"1932-11-21",null,"budget","passed","$4,000 (≈ $98,377 in 2026 dollars) city money to improve Garfield Street, Head to Orizaba","unverified",null,null,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed27sanfrich/page/n1913/mode/1up",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,0.37],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceed28sanfrich/423/230aa2e0",1933,1933,"1933-03-20","resolution",null,null,"Eaton & Smith given ninety more days on Garfield Street","unverified","journalofproceed28sanfrich",423,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n423",null,"Extension of Ninety Days' Time from March 24, 1933, Eaton & Smith, Garfield Street Between Orizaba Avenue and Head Street.",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sd:27815a33c2",1933,1933,"1933-03-20",null,"permits","passed","Eaton & Smith get 90 more days on Garfield Street","unverified",null,null,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n423/mode/1up",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,0.49],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceed28sanfrich/2235/acad23fc",1933,1933,"1933-12-18","resolution",null,"passed","James J. Lynch to be heard on the Garfield Street assessment","unverified","journalofproceed28sanfrich",2235,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n2235",null,"Setting Time and Place for Hearing of Appeal From Assessment for Improvement of Garfield Street, Etc. (Code No. 12.0613) On recommendation of Streets Committee.",null,null,"p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich|5",1934,1934,"1934-01-15","resolution","the-street",null,"Dr. A. H. White protests the Garfield Street paving bill","unverified","journalofproceed29sanfrich",94,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n94",null,"Resolution of Intention No. 115526, adopted by the Board of Public Works of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California, on October 21, 1931. Privilege of the Floor. Dr. A. H. White, protesting property owner, was granted the privilege of the floor and heard at length in opposition to ",null,null,"p","m",0,2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceed29sanfrich/461/c80bffee",1934,1934,"1934-03-26","resolution",null,"passed","Garfield Street paving bill upheld against the property owners' appeal","unverified","journalofproceed29sanfrich",461,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n461",null,"Denying Appeal From Assessment on Garfield Street.",null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceed29sanfrich/1402/bd351328",1934,1934,"1934-09-04","resolution",null,"passed","City pays part of the Garfield Street assessment for three owners","unverified","journalofproceed29sanfrich",1402,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n1402",null,"Approving Payments on Account of Assessment for Garfield Street.",null,null,"p","m",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceed50sanfrich/312/c45afa18",1955,1955,"1955-04-11","resolution",null,null,"Bright Street improved with about $5,300 (≈ $66,634 in 2026 dollars) of city aid","unverified","journalofproceed50sanfrich",313,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed50sanfrich/page/n312",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich|91",1977,1977,"1977-03-14","resolution","getting-around",null,"Stop signs added at Baker and Page and eighteen other corners","unverified","journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich",238,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich/page/n237",null,null,null,null,"p","m",0,-1.0]]}