{"id":null,"ids":[],"kind":"named in documents","name":"Alamo Square District","tied_by":"name","block":null,"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:98/2",1987,1976,"1976","finding","study or report",null,"Alamo Square Historic District case report · finding: Survey map of 1976 architectural ratings does not clarify whether rated buildings are contributory or individually landmark significant","unverified","C124889732",98,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n97",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:97/1",1987,1987,"","measure","study or report",null,"Alamo Square historic district · height ft: 50 foot height limit","unverified","C124889732",97,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n96",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:98/1",1987,1987,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Alamo Square Historic District ordinance · recommendation: Amend the ordinance or case report to add a specific list and description of each property within the Alamo Square boundary","unverified","C124889732",98,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n97",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:98/3",1987,1987,"","finding","study or report",null,"Alamo Square Historic District case report · finding: Generalizing buildings into two types may leave out buildings that do not fit the general description but contribute to the district","unverified","C124889732",98,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n97",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:98/4",1987,1987,"","finding","study or report",null,"Alamo Square Historic District ordinance Sec. 7 · finding: New construction standard requires conformity with district profile without specifying which building type to replicate","unverified","C124889732",98,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n97",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:98/5",1987,1987,"","finding","study or report",null,"Alamo Square Historic District ordinance Sec. 7 · finding: Replication of older building styles would generally not be permitted under the Secretary of the Interior's standards of rehabilitation","unverified","C124889732",98,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n97",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed85julydecsanfrich|166",1990,1990,"1990-10-15","resolution","running-the-city","passed","More time sought for the Alamo Square district decision","quoted","journalofproceed85julydecsanfrich",468,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed85julydecsanfrich/page/n465",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.54],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed85julydecsanfrich|242",1990,1990,"1990-12-03","resolution","running-the-city",null,"More time sought for the Alamo Square district decision","quoted","journalofproceed85julydecsanfrich",619,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed85julydecsanfrich/page/n616",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceedjanapr86sanfrich|54",1991,1991,"1991-01-22","resolution","running-the-city","passed","More time sought for the Alamo Square district decision","quoted","journalofproceedjanapr86sanfrich",99,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceedjanapr86sanfrich/page/n98",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.54],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceedjanapr86sanfrich|143",1991,1991,"1991-03-29","resolution","running-the-city","passed","More time sought for the Alamo Square district decision","quoted","journalofproceedjanapr86sanfrich",352,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceedjanapr86sanfrich/page/n351",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.54],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich|29",1991,1991,"1991-05-20","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Planning Commission to get until September on the Alamo Square district","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich",85,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich/page/n84",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.14],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich|205",1991,1991,"1991-08-26","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Planning Commission to get until January on the Alamo Square district","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich",553,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich/page/n552",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.27]]}