{"id":null,"ids":[],"kind":"named in documents","name":"Assessor's office","tied_by":"name","block":null,"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:614/10001",1910,1900,"1900","event","other",null,"Civil Service Commission examination for Ordinary Clerks · event: eligible list of Ordinary Clerks made up by Civil Service Commissioners","unverified","C101744345",614,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n613",null,"Thereafter an examination was held and an eligible list of ‘‘Ordinary Clerks’? was made up by the Civil Service Commissioners.",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:614/10002",1910,1900,"1900","finding","other",null,"Civil Service Commission attempt to include Assessor's office · finding: attempt to include the Assessor's office under Civil Service was without authority of law and had no effect","unverified","C101744345",614,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n613",null,"In my opinion, the attempt of the Civil Service Commissioners in 1900, to include the Assessor's office as being subject to Civil Service being without authority of law",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:620/1",1910,1903,"1903","finding","other",null,"Civil Service Commission examination of 1903 · finding: Examination questions did not include any questions relating to the Assessor's office","unverified","C101744345",620,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n619",null,"The examination questions under this examination did not include any questions relating to the Assessor‘s office.",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed01sanfrich:180/1",1906,1906,null,"resolution",null,null,"Supervisor Coffey moved a resolution paying Phillips & Van Orden $2468 (≈ $92,396 in 2026 dollars) from surplus funds for Assessor's office volumes.","quoted","journalofproceed01sanfrich",180,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed01sanfrich/page/n180",null,"Authonzmg an expenditure of $2468 to be made out of the Surplus Fund of the fiscal year 1904-1905",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed01sanfrich:192/5",1906,1906,"1906-07-19","resolution",null,"passed","Payment of $2,468 (≈ $92,396 in 2026 dollars) to Phillips & Van Orden from the 1904-1905 surplus for assessment rolls and indexes for the Assessor's office approved.","quoted","journalofproceed01sanfrich",192,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed01sanfrich/page/n192",null,"Resolution No. 200 (New Series), Authorizing an expenditure of $2468, to be made out of the Surplus Fund of the fiscal year 1904-1905",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed02sanfrich:608/1",1907,1907,null,"appointment",null,null,"Committee recommends setting aside $250 (≈ $9,025 in 2026 dollars) from the Rehabilitation Fund for fixtures in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed02sanfrich",608,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed02sanfrich/page/n607",null,"Your Committee recommends that the sum of $250 be set aside out of the \"Rehabilitation Fund\" for the purpose of completing furnishing",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed02sanfrich:70/3",1907,1907,"1907-02-18","resolution",null,"passed","Board appropriated $6,500 (≈ $234,655 in 2026 dollars) from the Surplus Fund for extra clerks in the Assessor's office.","unverified","journalofproceed02sanfrich",70,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed02sanfrich/page/n69",null,"Providing $6500 for Extra Clerks, Assessor. On motion of Supervisor Gallagher: Resolution No. 757, (New Series)",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed02sanfrich:503/3",1907,1907,"1907-08-27","resolution",null,"passed","$1,000 (≈ $36,101 in 2026 dollars) set aside from the departments improvement fund to move the Assessor's office to safer quarters.","quoted","journalofproceed02sanfrich",503,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed02sanfrich/page/n502",null,"Providing $1000 ror Removal of Assessor's Office.",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed02sanfrich:619/3",1907,1907,"1907-09-16","resolution",null,"passed","Assessor's office on McAllister Street gets $250 (≈ $9,025 in 2026 dollars) for furnishing and installing fixtures.","unverified","journalofproceed02sanfrich",619,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed02sanfrich/page/n618",null,"Providing $250 for Furnishing and Installing Fixtures, Assessor's Office.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed02sanfrich|894",1907,1907,"1907-09-16","resolution","public-money",null,"$250 (≈ $9,025 in 2026 dollars) to finish fitting out the Assessor's office on McAllister Street","unverified","journalofproceed02sanfrich",619,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed02sanfrich/page/n618",null,"Resolution No. 1400 (New Series), as follows : • - Resolved. That the sum of .'R250.00 be and the same is hereby set asi<le out of the item in the Budget \"For Ini])rovements and Rcbahilit.ition of I),'])artnients\" of the fiscal y(>;ir 1007-S for the l)uriH)se of completing the fin-nishiug and instal",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1908sanfrich:130/2",1908,1908,"1908-02-10","resolution",null,"passed","Board authorized payment of $678.84 (≈ $25,414 in 2026 dollars) from the General Fund to Brown & Power Co. for Assessor's office books.","quoted","journalofproceed1908sanfrich",130,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1908sanfrich/page/n130",null,"Authorizing Payment, Books, Assessor's Office. Resolution No. 1921 (New Series)",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1908sanfrich:1190/6",1908,1908,"1908-12-18","resolution",null,"passed","Resolution setting aside $500 (≈ $18,719 in 2026 dollars) for cabinets and shelving for the Assessor's office was adopted by 17 votes.","quoted","journalofproceed1908sanfrich",1190,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1908sanfrich/page/n1190",null,"Providing $500 for Construction of Cabinet and Shelving for Assessor.",null,null,"n","a",0,1.8],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:620/2",1910,1909,"1909","finding","other",null,"Civil Service Commission examination of 1909 · finding: Examination questions did not include any questions relating to the Assessor's office",null,"C101744345",620,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n619",null,"The examination questions under this examination did not include any questions relating to the Assessor‘s office.",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1909sanfrich:572/2",1909,1909,"1909-05-21","resolution",null,null,"Proposed resolution sets aside $925 (≈ $34,630 in 2026 dollars) for a brick and steel vault in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed1909sanfrich",572,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1909sanfrich/page/n572",null,"Providing $925 for Construction of Vault in Assessor's Office.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1909sanfrich:603/6",1909,1909,"1909-06-01","resolution",null,"passed","$925 (≈ $34,630 in 2026 dollars) was set aside for Board of Public Works to build a vault in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed1909sanfrich",603,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1909sanfrich/page/n603",null,"Providing $925 for Construction of Vault in Assessor's Office.",null,null,"n","a",0,5.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1909sanfrich:760/3",1909,1909,"1909-07-06","resolution",null,"continued","A $723 (≈ $27,068 in 2026 dollars) appropriation for platting homestead volumes for the Assessor's Office was laid over one week.","quoted","journalofproceed1909sanfrich",760,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1909sanfrich/page/n760",null,"Providing $723 for Platting Volumes of Homesteads, Assessor's Office. Resolution No. (New Series), as follows",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1909sanfrich:781/4",1909,1909,"1909-07-12","resolution",null,"passed","Board finally passed $723 (≈ $27,068 in 2026 dollars) from Urgent Necessities for platting homestead volumes for the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed1909sanfrich",781,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1909sanfrich/page/n781",null,"Providing $723 for Platting Volumes of Homesteads, Assessor's Office.",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1909sanfrich:1053/3",1909,1909,"1909-10-18","resolution",null,"passed","Resolution adopted: $400 (≈ $14,975 in 2026 dollars) set aside for shelving and cabinets in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed1909sanfrich",1053,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1909sanfrich/page/n1053",null,"Providing $400 for Installing Shelving, Cabinets and Pigeon Holes in Assessor's Office.",null,null,"n","a",0,1.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1910sanfrich:952/8",1910,1910,null,"charter_amendment",null,"passed","Voters were asked to approve a charter amendment on positions and salaries in the Assessor's office; the Board adopted it.","quoted","journalofproceed1910sanfrich",952,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1910sanfrich/page/n947",null,"Relating to Positions and Salaries in Assessor's Office.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.25],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:444/1",1910,1910,"","finding","other",null,"R. V. Crosky · finding: Civil Service standing in the Assessor's office is a matter to be determined by the Civil Service Board","unverified","C101744336",444,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n443",null,"whether or not Mr. R. V. Crosky is entitled to a Civil Service standing in the Assessor's office is a matter to be determined by your Board",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:444/10002",1910,1910,"","agency","other",null,"Assessor's office · other: Mr. R. V. Crosky Civil Service standing is a matter for the Board to determine","unverified","C101744336",444,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n443",null,"whether or not Mr. R. V. Crosky is entitled to a Civil Service standing in the Assessor's office is a matter to be determined by your Board",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:878/1",1910,1910,"","agency","other",null,"Assessor's Office · other: six assistant deputies at an annual salary of eighteen hundred dollars each","unverified","C101744336",878,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n877",null,"the Assessor may appoint six assistant deputies at an annual salary of eighteen hundred dollars each",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:878/2",1910,1910,"","agency","other",null,"Assessor's Office · other: twenty-one clerks at an annual salary of twelve hundred dollars each","unverified","C101744336",878,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n877",null,"twenty-one clerks at an annual salary of twelve hundred dollars each",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:878/3",1910,1910,"","agency","other",null,"Assessor's Office · finding: but four of the Charter positions of assistant deputies at eighteen hundred dollars each have been filled","unverified","C101744336",878,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n877",null,"but four of the Charter positions of assistant deputies at eighteen hundred dollars each have been filled",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:879/3",1910,1910,"","finding","other",null,"Assessor's Office extra positions · finding: Mayor and Board of Supervisors concluded it was necessary to create these extra positions","unverified","C101744336",879,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n878",null,"We must assume that his Honor the Mayor and the Board of Supervisors in the lawful exercise of their judgment concluded that it was necessary to create these extra positions",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:612/1",1910,1910,"","agency","other",null,"Assessor's office · other: chief deputy annual salary","unverified","C101744345",612,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n611",null,"may appoint a chief deputy, who shall receive an annual salary of twenty-four hundred dollars;",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:612/2",1910,1910,"","agency","other",null,"Assessor's office · other: cashier annual salary","unverified","C101744345",612,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n611",null,"one cashier who shall receive an annual salary of eighteen hundred dollars;",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:612/3",1910,1910,"","agency","other",null,"Assessor's office · other: six assistant deputies, annual salary each","unverified","C101744345",612,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n611",null,"six assistant deputies, who shall receive an annual salary of eighteen hundred dollars each;",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:612/4",1910,1910,"","agency","other",null,"Assessor's office · other: twenty-one clerks, annual salary each","unverified","C101744345",612,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n611",null,"twenty-one clerks, who shall each receive an annual salary of twelve hundred dollars;",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:612/5",1910,1910,"","agency","other",null,"Assessor's office · other: up to one hundred extra clerks for four months, pay not more than $100 a month each","unverified","C101744345",612,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n611",null,"during four months of the year not more than one hundred clerks, who shall each be paid at the rate of not more than one hundred dollars a month",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:616/1",1910,1910,"","agency","other",null,"Assessor's office · other: one hundred assistant deputies appointed by the Assessor","unverified","C101744345",616,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n615",null,"the one hundred of such deputies so appointed by the Assessor have been appointed in accordance with the provisions and requirements of the Charter",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:618/1",1910,1910,"","agency","other",null,"City Assessor's office · other: Assessor shall have one chief deputy and six assistant deputies","unverified","C101744345",618,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n617",null,"It has been provided in the Charter that the Assessor shall have one chief deputy and six assistant deputies.",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:620/3",1910,1910,"","finding","other",null,"Ordinary Clerks · finding: Ordinary Clerks have never been considered by the Civil Service Commission as Deputies","unverified","C101744345",620,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n619",null,"It will be seen from the above that ‘‘Ordinary Clerks’’ have never been considered by the Civil Service Commission as Deputies",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:620/4",1910,1910,"","recommendation","other",null,"Assistant Deputies in the Assessor's office · finding: Positions of Assistant Deputies in the Assessor's office cannot be filled by clerks from the Ordinary Clerks list","unverified","C101744345",620,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n619",null,"then said positions cannot be filled by clerks from the ‘‘Ordinary Clerks’’ list.",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:619/1",1910,1910,"1910","finding","other",null,"Civil Service Commission, Assessor's office deputies · finding: Commission never classified Deputies in the Assessor's office as subject to Civil Service","unverified","C101744345",619,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n618",null,"It thus appears that your Commission has never classified Deputies in the Assessor’s office as being subject to Civil Service.",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1910sanfrich:493/2",1910,1910,"1910-05-02","resolution",null,"passed","$300 (≈ $10,830 in 2026 dollars) from urgent necessities funds bought stationery for the Assessor's office, adopted.","quoted","journalofproceed1910sanfrich",493,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1910sanfrich/page/n490",null,"Providing $300 for Stationery for Use of Assessor.",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1910sanfrich:817/2",1910,1910,"1910-07-25","charter_amendment",null,"referred","A proposed charter amendment creating positions and fixing salaries in the Assessor's office was referred to the Charter Amendments Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed1910sanfrich",817,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1910sanfrich/page/n812",null,"Proposed Charter Amendment Relative to Salaries of Employes of Assessor's Office. Supervisor Hayden presented:",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1910sanfrich:1372/3",1910,1910,"1910-12-27","resolution",null,"passed","The Clerk was directed to advertise for bids to supply metal cases for the Assessor's office.","unverified","journalofproceed1910sanfrich",1372,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1910sanfrich/page/n1367",null,"Clerk to Advertise for Metal Cases for Assessor's Office. On motion of Supervisor Nelson: Resolution No. 7104 (New Series)",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.2],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:617/1",1910,1910,"February 17, 1900","agency","other",null,"Assessor's office · jobs: six assistant deputies","unverified","C101744345",617,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n616",null,"Article IV, Chapter IV, Section 1 of the Charter provides the Assessor shall have six (6) assistant deputies, twenty-one (21) clerks and not more than one hundred (100) clerks dur- ing four months",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:617/2",1910,1910,"February 17, 1900","finding","other",null,"Assessor's office clerks · finding: a clerkship is not an office but an employment; a clerk is a mere employee","unverified","C101744345",617,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n616",null,"The court held that a clerkship is not an office but an employment and that a clerk is a mere employee.",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:443/1",1910,1910,"July 1913","finding","other",null,"R. V. Crosky, Chief Deputy, Assessor's office · finding: Cashier and Deputy positions in the Assessor's office are exempt from Civil Service","unverified","C101744336",443,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n442",null,"are by the express language of Section 11, Subdivision A, Article XIII, as amended and approved by the Legislature on March 28, 1913, exempt from the operation of Civil Service.",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:1066/1",1910,1910,"July 27, 1915","event","other",null,"Assessor's office extra positions · other: City Attorney opinion on legality of certain extra positions created in the Assessor's office","unverified","C101744336",1066,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n1065",null,"On July 27, 1915, I rendered an opinion advising you as to the legality of certain extra positions created in the Assessor’s office.",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:445/1",1910,1910,"July 31, 1913","agency","other",null,"Assessor's office · other: employee E. J. McDevitt, clerk and assistant deputy, Civil Service standing question","unverified","C101744336",445,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n444",null,"Civil Service Standing of E. J. McDevitt. July 31, 1913. Gentlemen: I am in receipt of your communication requesting my opinion as to the Civil Service standing",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:612/6",1910,1910,"October 10, 1911","event","other",null,"Assessor's office · other: Assessor's office made subject to Charter Civil Service provisions by constitutional amendment","unverified","C101744345",612,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n611",null,"on October 10, 1911, Section 84% of Article XI of the State Constitution was amended providing that any Sections",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1911sanfrich:104/3",1911,1911,null,"resolution",null,"passed","The Board approved $880 (≈ $31,769 in 2026 dollars) to buy metal book racks for the Assessor's office.","unverified","journalofproceed1911sanfrich",104,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1911sanfrich/page/n104",null,"Providing $380.00 for Metal Book Racks, Assessor's Office.",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1911sanfrich:425/9",1911,1911,null,"resolution",null,null,"The Bay Cities Home Telephone Company was requested to install a telephone in the Assessor's office at 224 McAllister.","unverified","journalofproceed1911sanfrich",425,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1911sanfrich/page/n425",null,"Install Home Telephone Service. On motion of Supervisor Nelson: Also, Resolution No. 7782 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1911sanfrich:87/2",1911,1911,null,"resolution",null,"passed","Public Buildings Committee was granted $880 (≈ $31,769 in 2026 dollars) from the public buildings budget to buy a metal book rack for the Assessor's office.","unverified","journalofproceed1911sanfrich",null,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1911sanfrich/page/n87",null,"Providing $380.00 for IVIetal Book Racks, Assessor's Office.",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1911sanfrich:89/6",1911,1911,null,"contract",null,"passed","Rulofson Metal Window Works was awarded an $880 (≈ $31,769 in 2026 dollars) contract to furnish a book rack for the Assessor's office.","unverified","journalofproceed1911sanfrich",89,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1911sanfrich/page/n89",null,"Award of Contract, Book Rack, Assessor's Office. On motion of Supervisor Nelson: Resolution No. 7252 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,1.8],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:615/3",1910,1911,"1911","finding","other",null,"Constitutional amendment of 1911 and Assessor's office under Civil Service · finding: amendment made effective the Charter provision placing the Assessor's office under Civil Service but did not validate prior Commission actions","unverified","C101744345",615,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n614",null,"But the constitutional amendment does not state in terms nor impliedly that any action which had previous to the amendment been taken by the Civil Service Commission",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1911sanfrich:50/2",1911,1911,"1911-01-16","contract",null,"referred","Bids for steel filing racks for the Assessor's office were received and referred to the Public Buildings Committee.","unverified","journalofproceed1911sanfrich",50,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1911sanfrich/page/n50",null,"Steel Metal Filing Racks, Assessor. Proposals for furnishing and installing steel metal filing racks in the Assessor's office",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1912sanfrich:52/2",1912,1912,"1912-01-08","resolution",null,"referred","Proposal to spend $2,275 (≈ $79,297 in 2026 dollars) on carpentry and electrical work in the Assessor's Office was sent back to Finance Committee.","unverified","journalofproceed1912sanfrich",52,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1912sanfrich/page/n52",null,"Providing $2275 for Carpenter end Electrical Work in Assessor's Office, Temporary City Hall Building.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1912sanfrich:65/5",1912,1912,"1912-01-15","resolution",null,"passed","Passed final approval of $2,275 (≈ $79,297 in 2026 dollars) for carpentry and electrical work in the Assessor's office in Temporary City Hall.","quoted","journalofproceed1912sanfrich",65,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1912sanfrich/page/n65",null,"Providing $2275 for Carpenter and Electrical Work in Assessor's Office, City Hall. Resolution No. 9240 (New Series), Providing the following sums to be expended by the Board of Public Works",null,null,"n","a",0,-0.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1912sanfrich:784/2",1912,1912,"1912-08-26","resolution",null,"passed","Board appropriated $2,500 (≈ $87,139 in 2026 dollars) for Civic Center plans and $4,000 (≈ $139,423 in 2026 dollars) for Assessor's office maps, in final passage.","quoted","journalofproceed1912sanfrich",784,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1912sanfrich/page/n784",null,"Appropriations. Resolution No. 9621 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the following amounts be and the same are hereby set aside",null,null,"n","a",0,1.95],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1913sanfrich:1022/3",1913,1913,"1913-09-29","resolution",null,"passed first reading","Resolution proposing $5,000 (≈ $170,172 in 2026 dollars) from the paving budget to restore Assessor's Office records, passed for printing.","quoted","journalofproceed1913sanfrich",1022,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1913sanfrich/page/n1022",null,"Providing $5,000 for Restoration of Records in the Assessor's Office. Also, Resolution No. (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the sum of five thousand dollars",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1913sanfrich:1034/2",1913,1913,"1913-09-29","resolution",null,"passed","Board appropriated $5,000 (≈ $170,172 in 2026 dollars) from a street paving budget item to restore records in the Assessor's Office.","quoted","journalofproceed1913sanfrich",1034,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1913sanfrich/page/n1034",null,"Providing $5,000 for Restoration of Records in the Assessor's Office.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1914sanfrich:1559/13",1914,1914,"1914-12-21","contract",null,"passed","Printing and book contracts for the Assessor's office were awarded to named bidders, adopted on Supervisor Hilmer's motion.","quoted","journalofproceed1914sanfrich",1559,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1914sanfrich/page/n1559",null,"Award of Contracts, Printing and Books. On motion of Supervisor Hilmer: Resolution No. 11418 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the contracts for furnishing and delivering the printing",null,null,"n","a",0,-0.2],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1914sanfrich:1560/1",1914,1914,"1914-12-21","resolution",null,"passed","Printing contracts for the Assessor's office awarded to Edward Barry Co and Shannon-Conmy Printing Co; other bids rejected.","quoted","journalofproceed1914sanfrich",1560,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1914sanfrich/page/n1560",null,"Award of Contracts, Printing and Books. On motion of Supervisor Hilmer: Resolution No. 11418 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-0.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1915sanfrich:723/4",1915,1915,"1915-05-25","other",null,"amended","Supervisor Nelson moved to cut the Assessor's Office budget from $98,800 (≈ $3.3 million in 2026 dollars) to a lower amount.","unverified","journalofproceed1915sanfrich",723,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1915sanfrich/page/n714",null,"Assessor's Office. Supervisor Nelson moved to strike out: Assessor. 99 Assessor $8,000",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1915sanfrich:1343/1",1915,1915,"1915-10-11","ballot_measure",null,"referred","The Assessor's Office urged voters to defeat Constitutional Amendment No. 9 on taxation; the letter was sent to the Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed1915sanfrich",1343,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1915sanfrich/page/n1326",null,"Assessor Recommends Defeat of Proposed Constitutional Amendment No. 1, Relating to Taxation.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:879/1",1910,1915,"June 25, 1915","event","other",null,"Ordinance No. 3335 (New Series), Assessor's Office · approved: four assistant deputies at an annual salary of twenty-one hundred dollars each","unverified","C101744336",879,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n878",null,"four assistant deputies at an annual salary of twenty-one hundred dollars each and eighteen deputy assessors",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:879/2",1910,1915,"June 25, 1915","event","other",null,"Ordinance No. 3335 (New Series), Assessor's Office · approved: eighteen deputy assessors at an annual salary of fifteen hundred dollars each","unverified","C101744336",879,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n878",null,"four assistant deputies at an annual salary of twenty-one hundred dollars each and eighteen deputy assessors at an annual salary of fifteen hundred dollars each",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1916sanfrich:777/9",1916,1916,"1916-05-27","other",null,"amended","Assessor's Office extra clerks item amended from $50,000 (≈ $1.5 million in 2026 dollars) to $45,000 (≈ $1.4 million in 2026 dollars); no final vote found","quoted","journalofproceed1916sanfrich",777,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1916sanfrich/page/n776",null,"Assessor's Office. Supervisor Poicer moved that Item No. 109, Extra Clerks, Charter, be reduced from $50,000 to $45,000.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1917sanfrich:204/2",1917,1917,"1917-02-05","resolution","health","passed","Board appropriates $11,345.50 (≈ $298,653 in 2026 dollars) for San Francisco Hospital equipment and an Assessor's office balcony in City Hall.","quoted","journalofproceed1917sanfrich",204,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1917sanfrich/page/n204",null,"Appropriations. Also, Resolution No. (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the following amounts be and the same are hereby set",null,null,"n","a",0,2.77],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1917sanfrich:229/3",1917,1917,"1917-02-13","resolution","health","passed","Resolution sets aside $11,345.50 (≈ $298,653 in 2026 dollars) for San Francisco Hospital equipment and an Assessor's office balcony in City Hall.","quoted","journalofproceed1917sanfrich",229,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1917sanfrich/page/n229",null,"Appropriations. Resolution No. 13961 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,2.64],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1917sanfrich:435/3",1917,1917,"1917-03-26","resolution",null,"passed","The Board to rescind a $1,390 (≈ $36,590 in 2026 dollars) appropriation for a balcony and partitions in the Assessor's Office at City Hall; passed first reading only.","quoted","journalofproceed1917sanfrich",435,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1917sanfrich/page/n435",null,"Rescinding Resolution No. 13961 (New Series), Providing for Furnishing Balcony, Etc., Assessor's Office.",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1917sanfrich:435/4",1917,1917,"1917-03-26","resolution",null,"passed first reading","A $1,390 (≈ $36,590 in 2026 dollars) appropriation for a balcony and partitions in the Assessor's Office, City Hall, was passed for printing.","quoted","journalofproceed1917sanfrich",435,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1917sanfrich/page/n435",null,"Providing $1390 for Furnishing Balcony, Etc., Assessor's Office.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1917sanfrich|574",1917,1917,"1917-03-26","resolution","land-and-building",null,"City sets aside $1,390 (≈ $36,590 in 2026 dollars) for a balcony in the Assessor's office","unverified","journalofproceed1917sanfrich",435,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1917sanfrich/page/n435",null,"Resolution No. (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the sum of $1,390.00 be and the same is hereby set aside, appropriated and authorized to be expended out of General Fund, 1916-1917, for furnishing and installing balcony, partitions, etc., in the office of the Assessor, City Hall (Mullen Mfg. ",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1917sanfrich:469/3",1917,1917,"1917-04-02","resolution",null,"passed","City approved $1,390 (≈ $36,590 in 2026 dollars) to Mullen Mfg. Co. for a balcony and partitions in the Assessor's office, City Hall.","quoted","journalofproceed1917sanfrich",469,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1917sanfrich/page/n469",null,"Providing $1390 for Furnisliing Balcony, Etc., Assessor's Office. Resolution No. 14174 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,1.8],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1917sanfrich|616",1917,1917,"1917-04-02","resolution","land-and-building",null,"City sets aside $1,390 (≈ $36,590 in 2026 dollars) for a balcony in the Assessor's office","unverified","journalofproceed1917sanfrich",469,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1917sanfrich/page/n469",null,"Resolution No. 14174 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the sum of $1,390.00 be and the same is hereby set aside, appropriated and authorized to be expended out of General Fund, 1916-1917, for furnishing and installing balcony, partitions, etc., in the office of the Assessor, City Hall (Mullen",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1918sanfrich:475/4",1918,1918,"1918-05-22","other",null,"passed","Assessor's Office deputy and assistant deputy salaries totalling $50,400 (≈ $1.1 million in 2026 dollars) were approved by eleven votes to two.","quoted","journalofproceed1918sanfrich",475,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1918sanfrich/page/n468",null,"18 Deputies at $1,800, $32,400. 4 Assistant deputies at $2,400, $9,600.",null,null,"n","a",0,4.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1918sanfrich:567/5",1918,1918,"1918-06-17","resolution",null,"passed","Sets aside $439.91 (≈ $9,816 in 2026 dollars) for improved lighting fixtures in the Assessor's office at City Hall.","quoted","journalofproceed1918sanfrich",567,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1918sanfrich/page/n560",null,"Providing $439.91, Ligiiting Fixtures in Assessor's Office. Supervisor McLeran presented: Resolution No. 15791 (New Series)",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1919sanfrich:768/3",1919,1919,"1919-07-28","communication",null,"referred","The Mayor's proposal to create new Assessor's Office positions was sent to the Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed1919sanfrich",768,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1919sanfrich/page/n768",null,"Creation of Positions in the Assessor's Office. Communication — Prom his Honor, the Mayor, recommending",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1920sanfrich:605/4",1920,1920,"1920-06-14","resolution",null,"continued","A $4,000 (≈ $67,388 in 2026 dollars) appropriation for clerical help in the Assessor's office was laid over one week.","quoted","journalofproceed1920sanfrich",605,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1920sanfrich/page/n605",null,"Resolution No. (New Series), Appropriating the sum of $4,000 out of Urgent Necessity, Budget Item No. 28",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1920sanfrich:624/10",1920,1920,"1920-06-21","resolution",null,"passed","Board appropriated $4,000 (≈ $67,388 in 2026 dollars) from Urgent Necessity for clerical assistance in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed1920sanfrich",624,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1920sanfrich/page/n624",null,"Appropriation. Resolution No. 18027 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the sum of $4000.00 be and the same is hereby set aside",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1920sanfrich:1114/1",1920,1920,"1920-12-06","resolution","health","passed","Appropriations of $1,105 (≈ $18,616 in 2026 dollars) for Assessor's office carpentry and $2,500 (≈ $42,118 in 2026 dollars) for interior painting at San Francisco Hospital, adopted.","quoted","journalofproceed1920sanfrich",1114,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1920sanfrich/page/n1114",null,"Appropriations. On motion of Supervisor McLeran: Resolution No. (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the following amounts",null,null,"n","a",0,2.39],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1920sanfrich:1137/6",1920,1920,"1920-12-13","resolution","health","passed","The Board appropriated $3,605 (≈ $60,733 in 2026 dollars) for repairs at the Assessor's office and painting at San Francisco Hospital.","quoted","journalofproceed1920sanfrich",1137,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1920sanfrich/page/n1137",null,"Resolution No. 18479 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the following amounts be and the same are hereby set aside, appropriated",null,null,"n","a",0,2.64],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1920sanfrich:1151/3",1920,1920,"1920-12-20","claim",null,null,"Eugene Dietzgen Co. is owed $1,242 (≈ $20,924 in 2026 dollars) for mounting maps for the Assessor's office; listed for payment, no vote found.","quoted","journalofproceed1920sanfrich",1151,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1920sanfrich/page/n1151",null,"(38) Eugene Dietzgen Co., mounting 4 970 maps for office of Assessor (claim dated",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1921sanfrich|107",1921,1921,"1921-02-07","ordinance","running-the-city","passed","Assessor's office to have eighteen deputies at $2,100 (≈ $39,529 in 2026 dollars) a year","quoted","journalofproceed1921sanfrich",124,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1921sanfrich/page/n123",null,"Ordinance No. 5184 (New Series) is hereby amended to read as follows: (e) Eighteen deputies, grade four, each at a salary of $2,100 a year. (Assessor.) Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately. Accepting Offer to Sell Land for the Widening of San Jose Avenue. Supervisor McLeran presen",null,null,"n","a",0,2.27],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1921sanfrich:140/3",1921,1921,"1921-02-14","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Ordinance amending Assessor's Office staffing to eighteen grade-four deputies at $2,100 (≈ $39,529 in 2026 dollars) a year was passed for printing.","quoted","journalofproceed1921sanfrich",140,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1921sanfrich/page/n139",null,"Additional Positions Ordinance Amended, Assessor's Office. Bill No. , Ordinance No.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1923sanfrich:1221/3",1923,1923,"1923-10-22","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","A bill amending the Additional Positions Ordinance for the Assessor's Office, adding staff positions at $2,100 (≈ $41,379 in 2026 dollars) a year, was passed for printing.","quoted","journalofproceed1923sanfrich",1221,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1923sanfrich/page/n1221",null,"Additional Positions Ordinance Amended, Assessor's Office. On motion of Supervisor Mc- Leran: Bill No. 6472",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.2],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1923sanfrich:1244/1",1923,1923,"1923-10-29","ordinance",null,"passed","Assessor's Office gets twenty-nine deputies at $2,100 (≈ $41,379 in 2026 dollars) a year, amending the additional positions ordinance.","quoted","journalofproceed1923sanfrich",1244,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1923sanfrich/page/n1244",null,"Additional Positions Ordinance Amended, Assessor's Office. Bill No. 6472, Ordinance No. 6032 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1923sanfrich:1447/4",1923,1923,"1923-12-24","ordinance",null,"referred","Supervisor Scott proposed monthly pay amendments for Assessor's Office appraisers, which were referred for consideration.","quoted","journalofproceed1923sanfrich",1447,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1923sanfrich/page/n1447",null,"Supervisor Scott presented the following proposed amendments: Assessor's Office. Subdivision (d) — One superintendent of appraisers at $400 per month.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1924sanfrich:608/3",1924,1924,"1924-05-14","motion",null,"passed","Assessor's office salaries and expenses proposed for approval; the vote continues on the next page.","quoted","journalofproceed1924sanfrich",608,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1924sanfrich/page/n607",null,"ASSESSOR. Motion. Supervisor McLeran moved that the following items be approved: Personal Services — (Appropriation 8-A)",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1924sanfrich:1751/2",1924,1924,"1924-12-29","resolution",null,"passed","Board authorizes the Auditor to cancel 292 demands from the Assessor's office, on the Auditor's recommendation.","quoted","journalofproceed1924sanfrich",1751,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1924sanfrich/page/n1748",null,"Cancellation of Demands. Resolution No. 23374 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1924sanfrich|2378",1924,1924,"1924-12-29","resolution","the-street","passed","Old city bills cancelled, including 292 from the Assessor's office","unverified","journalofproceed1924sanfrich",1751,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1924sanfrich/page/n1748",null,"Resolution No. 23374 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That, in accordance with recommendation of the Auditor of the City and County, in communication dated December 26, 1924, filed in Clerk's office of the Board of Supervisors December 26, 1924, containing list of demands in various names and amo",null,null,"n","a",0,1.64],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1925sanfrich:1087/3",1925,1925,"1925-07-06","resolution",null,"passed","The Board authorized the Clerk to appoint Assessor's office employees as deputy clerks during the Board of Equalization meeting.","quoted","journalofproceed1925sanfrich",1087,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1925sanfrich/page/n1086",null,"Clerk to Deputize Assessor's Deputies As Deputy Clerks for Board of Equalization. Supervisor Rossi presented: Resolution No. 24241 (New Series)",null,null,"n","a",0,1.8],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1925sanfrich:1715/2",1925,1925,"1925-11-16","resolution",null,null,"Appropriates $800 (≈ $15,403 in 2026 dollars) for an intercommunicating telephone system in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed1925sanfrich",1715,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1925sanfrich/page/n1714",null,"Miscellaneous Repairs to Buildings, Etc.. Budget Item 52. For the installation of an intercommunicating",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1925sanfrich:1768/4",1925,1925,"1925-11-23","resolution","water-sewers","passed","The Board adopted $290 (≈ $5,584 in 2026 dollars) for a redwood sewer box drain at Jerrold Avenue and $225 (≈ $4,332 in 2026 dollars) for Assessor's Office lighting.","quoted","journalofproceed1925sanfrich",1768,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1925sanfrich/page/n1767",null,"Appropriation, Redwood Box Drain. Etc., Jerrold Avenue; Lighting Fixtures, Assessor's Office. Supervisor McLeran presented: Resolution No. 24820 (New Series)",null,null,"n","a",0,2.36],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:924/2",1926,1926,"1926-05-24","other",null,"withdrawn","Supervisor Gallagher moved to withdraw from the Finance Committee the Assessor's office increase from $91,800 (≈ $1.7 million in 2026 dollars) to $96,800 (≈ $1.8 million in 2026 dollars).","quoted","journalofproceed21sanfrich",924,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n924",null,"Supervisor Gallagher moved that Item No. 210, dealing with the in- crease of the allotment of the As- sessor's office",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:1188/3",1926,1926,"1926-06-28","resolution",null,"passed","Clerk authorized to assign Assessor's office employees as deputy clerks during Board of Equalization meetings.","quoted","journalofproceed21sanfrich",1188,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n1188",null,"Resolved, That the Clerk of this Board is hereby authorized to designate such employees of the Assessor's office",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:1189/1",1926,1926,"1926-06-28","resolution",null,"passed","Clerk authorized to appoint Assessor's office employees as temporary deputy clerks during Board of Equalization meetings.","quoted","journalofproceed21sanfrich",1189,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n1189",null,"Resolution No. 25874 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the Clerk of this Board is hereby authorized to designate such employees",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.3],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:1509/3",1926,1926,"1926-09-13","charter_amendment",null,"referred","A proposed charter amendment on the Assessor's office, submitted by W. C. Stetson and others, was referred to the Judiciary Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed21sanfrich",1509,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n1509",null,"Communication, from W. C. Stetson and others, representing the Assessor's office",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:1960/6",1926,1926,"1926-11-29","other",null,"passed","Assessor's Office stenographer-typist salary raised from $1,500 (≈ $28,554 in 2026 dollars) to $1,800 (≈ $34,265 in 2026 dollars) a year, approved.","quoted","journalofproceed21sanfrich",1960,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n1960",null,"Budget Item No. 225, stenographer-typist, increase from $1,500 to $1,800 per annum.",null,null,"n","a",0,1.7],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:268/4",1927,1927,"1927-02-07","resolution",null,"refused","Resolution proposing salary budget transfers for the Assessor's Office from January 1, 1927; outcome continues on next page.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",268,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n268",null,"Assessor. Supervisor Shannon presented: Resolution No. (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That, pursuant to Ordinance No. 7117",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:594/4",1927,1927,"1927-04-04","resolution",null,null,"Funds were proposed to keep Assessor's office clerks employed for the rest of the fiscal year and to continue property appraisals.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",594,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n594",null,"Appropriation, $6,400, Continuation of Employment of Clerks, Assessor's Office.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:626/2",1927,1927,"1927-04-11","resolution",null,"passed","Board appropriated $6,400 (≈ $123,932 in 2026 dollars) to keep clerks employed in the Assessor's Office, plus $720 (≈ $13,942 in 2026 dollars) for property appraisal work.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",626,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n626",null,"Appropriation, $6,400, Continuation of Employment of Clerks, Assessor's Office.",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:1337/4",1927,1927,"1927-07-05","resolution",null,"passed","Board authorized the Clerk to assign Assessor's office employees as deputy clerks during Board of Equalization sessions.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1337,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1337",null,"Assessor's Clerks to Act as Clerks of Board of Equalization. Supervisor Kent presented: Resolution No. 27472 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,1.7],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:447/3",1928,1928,"1928-03-12","resolution","health",null,"Resolution proposes $570 (≈ $11,231 in 2026 dollars) for an office partition at the Assessor's Office, with other repairs and a Fillmore Street sewer.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",447,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n447",null,"Appropriations, Repairs, Assessor's Office, Chapel at San Francisco Hospital and Fillmore Street Sewer. Also, Resolution No. (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:485/2",1928,1928,"1928-03-19","resolution","health","passed","Funds set aside for an Assessor's office partition, San Francisco Hospital chapel wiring, and Fillmore Street sewer inspection.","unverified","journalofproceed23sanfrich",485,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n485",null,"Appropriations, Repairs, Assessor's Office, Chapel at San Francisco Hospital and Fillmore Street Sewer.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.64],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:1379/4",1928,1928,"1928-06-25","resolution",null,"passed","Board authorizes the Clerk to designate Assessor's office employees as deputy clerks during Board of Equalization meetings.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",1379,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n1379",null,"Resolved, That the Clerk of this Board is hereby authorized to designate such employees of the Assessor's office",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:2545/2",1928,1928,"1928-11-13","resolution",null,null,"The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company is asked to install switchboard service in the Assessor's office at City Hall.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",2545,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n2545",null,"Switchboard Service, Assessor. Also, Resolution No. 29953 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:2657/1",1928,1928,"1928-12-03","communication",null,"referred","Mayor recommended a $150 (≈ $2,956 in 2026 dollars)-a-month telephone operator post in the Assessor's office; referred to Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",2657,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n2657",null,"Telephone Operator for Assessor's Office. Communication, from Miayor, recommending that there be created",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:2723/2",1928,1928,"1928-12-10","ordinance",null,"passed","Adds one telephone operator position at $1,800 (≈ $35,467 in 2026 dollars) a year to the Assessor's Office.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",2723,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n2723",null,"Amending Additional Positions Ordinance, Telephone Operator for Assessor's Office.",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:2766/4",1928,1928,"1928-12-17","ordinance",null,null,"Proposed ordinance adds a telephone operator position to the Assessor's Office by amending the Additional Positions Ordinance.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",2766,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n2766",null,"Amending Additional Positions Ordinance, Telephone Operator for Assessor's Office.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:1090/3",1929,1929,"1929-05-23","other",null,"passed","Assessor's office salary appropriations were listed for approval without objection, continuing onto the next page.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",1090,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n1090",null,"ASSESSOR. The following items were taken up and approved without objection: Personal Services — (Appropriation 8-A)",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:1091/2",1929,1929,"1929-05-23","other",null,"passed","Assessor's office approved $41,500 (≈ $817,720 in 2026 dollars) for personal and non-personal service on assessment adjustments.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",1091,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n1091",null,"Personal and Non-Personal Service for Adjustments of Assessment",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:1091/3",1929,1929,"1929-05-23","other",null,"passed","Assessor's office approved $6,000 (≈ $118,225 in 2026 dollars) for non-personal services, including automobiles.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",1091,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n1091",null,"Non-Personal Services, including Autos at $40 a month",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:1091/4",1929,1929,"1929-05-23","other",null,"passed","Assessor's office approved $13,500 (≈ $266,005 in 2026 dollars) for stationery, postage and printing.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",1091,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n1091",null,"Stationery, Postage and Printing (Appropriation 8-C)",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:1207/23",1929,1929,"1929-06-10","claim",null,"passed","Payment of $535 (≈ $10,542 in 2026 dollars) to Edw. Barry Co. for Assessor's office printing was approved.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",1207,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n1207",null,"Edw. Barry Co., printing for Assessor (claim dated May 28, 1929)",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:1352/2",1929,1929,"1929-06-24","resolution",null,"passed","Assessor's office employees authorized to serve as deputy clerks during Board of Equalization meetings; adopted.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",1352,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n1352",null,"Assessor's Employees to Act as Deputy Clerks. Resolution No. 31063 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the Clerk",null,null,"n","a",0,1.7],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed25part3sanfrich:967/2",1930,1930,null,"resolution",null,"passed","The Board adopted a resolution publicly mourning the death of Joseph Tuite, a longtime Assessor's office member.","quoted","journalofproceed25part3sanfrich",967,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed25part3sanfrich/page/n966",null,"Death of Jos. Tuite, Deputy Assessor. The following resolution was presented and adopted by a ringing vote: Resolution No. 33000 (New Series)",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed25sanfrich:17/13",1930,1930,"1930-01-06","claim",null,"passed","City approved a $1,515.75 (≈ $30,582 in 2026 dollars) payment to Elliott Addressing Machine Co. for supplies for the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed25sanfrich",17,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed25sanfrich/page/n16",null,"Elliott Addressing Machine Co., supplies for Elliott addressing machine, office of the Assessor (claim dated Dec. 19, 1929)",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed25sanfrich:779/1",1930,1930,"1930-03-03","resolution","police","passed","Appropriations approved for electric wiring at the Mission Police Station and shelving work in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed25sanfrich",779,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed25sanfrich/page/n778",null,"Appropriations for Carpentry Work, Etc., Assessor's OfBce and Mission Police Station. Also. Resolution No. 32144 f New Series ), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,2.57],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed25part2sanfrich:672/19",1930,1930,"1930-06-30","claim",null,null,"Payment of $1,200 (≈ $24,211 in 2026 dollars) to Elliott Addressing Machine Co. for typewriter blanks for the Assessor's office is listed.","quoted","journalofproceed25part2sanfrich",672,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed25part2sanfrich/page/n669",null,"(36) Elliott Addressing Machine Co., 100,000 typewriter blanks, Assessor's office (claim dated June 20, 1930)",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed25part2sanfrich:720/3",1930,1930,"1930-06-30","resolution",null,"passed","Assessor's office employees may be designated as deputy clerks during Board of Equalization meetings.","quoted","journalofproceed25part2sanfrich",720,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed25part2sanfrich/page/n717",null,"Assessor's Deputies to Act as Clerks. Resolution No. 32761 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,1.7],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed25part2sanfrich:822/17",1930,1930,"1930-07-15","other",null,null,"Elliott Addressing Machine Co. is listed for $1,200 (≈ $24,211 in 2026 dollars) of typewriter blanks for the Assessor's office; the outcome is not printed here.","quoted","journalofproceed25part2sanfrich",822,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed25part2sanfrich/page/n819",null,"Elliott Addressing Machine Co., 100,000 typewriter blanks, Assessor's office (claim dated June 20, 1930)",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed25part2sanfrich:861/1",1930,1930,"1930-07-15","resolution",null,null,"Resolution appropriates $4,800 (≈ $96,845 in 2026 dollars) from the General Fund for thirty temporary assistant deputies in the Assessor's Office, June 1930.","quoted","journalofproceed25part2sanfrich",861,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed25part2sanfrich/page/n858",null,"Appropriation for Employment, Thirty Assistant Deputies, Assessor's Office, June 1930.",null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed25part2sanfrich:908/21",1930,1930,"1930-07-28","other",null,"passed","Appropriation proposed to hire thirty assistant deputies in the Assessor's Office for June 1930.","quoted","journalofproceed25part2sanfrich",908,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed25part2sanfrich/page/n905",null,"Appropriation for Employment, Thirty Assistant Deputies, Assessor's Office, June 1930",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed25part3sanfrich:551/22",1930,1930,"1930-10-27","claim",null,null,"Payment of $505.00 (≈ $10,189 in 2026 dollars) to Gimmel Bros. Inc. for electric appliances for the Assessor's office is listed for payment.","quoted","journalofproceed25part3sanfrich",551,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed25part3sanfrich/page/n550",null,"Gimmel Bros. Inc., electric appliances for office of Assessor (claim dated October 6, 1930)",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed25part3sanfrich:551/23",1930,1930,"1930-10-27","claim",null,null,"Payment of $790.00 (≈ $15,939 in 2026 dollars) to Neal, Stratford & Kerr for 200 field books for the Assessor's office is listed for payment.","quoted","journalofproceed25part3sanfrich",551,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed25part3sanfrich/page/n550",null,"Neal, Stratford & Kerr, 20O field books, office of Assessor (claim dated October 6, 1930)",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26sanfrich:1440/3",1931,1931,"1931-06-22","resolution",null,"passed","Board transferred $5,000 (≈ $110,836 in 2026 dollars) from one Assessor's Office appropriation to another.","quoted","journalofproceed26sanfrich",1440,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26sanfrich/page/n1411",null,"Transfer of $5,000 From Assessor's Appropriation 8A to 8B. Also, Resolution No. 34588 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,1.8],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich:68/1",1931,1931,"1931-06-29","resolution",null,"passed","Clerk may designate Assessor's office employees as deputy clerks while the Board of Equalization meets.","quoted","journalofproceed26part2sanfrich",68,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich/page/n61",null,"Authorizing Designation of Employees of Assessor's Office as Deputy Clerks of Board of Supervisors While",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich:1205/24",1931,1931,"1931-12-21","claim",null,"passed","City paid John Kitchen, Jr., Company $1,098 (≈ $24,339 in 2026 dollars) for real estate rolls for the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed26part2sanfrich",1205,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich/page/n1180",null,"(72) John Kitchen, Jr., Company, forty-five Real Estate Rolls, Assessor's office (claim dated Dec. 11, 1931)",null,null,"n","a",0,1.7],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed27sanfrich:904/4",1932,1932,"1932-05-18","other",null,"passed","Supervisor Miles moved to cut Assessor's Office non-personal items from $8,220 (≈ $202,164 in 2026 dollars) to $7,220 (≈ $177,570 in 2026 dollars); the final vote continues on the next page.","quoted","journalofproceed27sanfrich",904,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed27sanfrich/page/n904",null,"Assessor's Office. Supervisor Miles moved to amend: Line 17, sheet 2, reduce \"Total Non-Personal Items\" from $8,220 to $7,220.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed27sanfrich:1234/1",1932,1932,"1932-06-27","resolution",null,"passed","Assessor's office employees authorized to serve as deputy clerks while the Board of Equalization sits.","quoted","journalofproceed27sanfrich",1234,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed27sanfrich/page/n1234",null,"Authorizing Designation of Employees of Assessor's Office as Deputy Clerks of Board of Supervisors While",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich:1352/3",1933,1933,"1933-06-26","resolution",null,"passed","The Clerk was authorized to designate Assessor's office employees as deputy clerks during equalization board sittings.","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",1352,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n1352",null,"Authorizing Designation of Employees of Assessor's Office as Deputy Clerks of Board of Supervisors",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:974/4",1934,1934,"1934-06-25","resolution",null,"passed","Board authorized the clerk to designate Assessor's Office employees as deputy clerks during equalization meetings.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",974,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n974",null,"Authorizing Designation of Employees of Assessor's Office as Deputy Clerks of Board of Supervisors While Acting as Board",null,null,"n","a",0,1.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:1381/2",1934,1934,"1934-08-27","ordinance",null,"passed","Board finally passed an ordinance creating a $2,000 (≈ $50,290 in 2026 dollars) revolving change fund for the Assessor's office to make tax change.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",1381,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n1381",null,"Creating Assessor's Revolving Fund of $2,000. (Code No. 9.011)",null,null,"n","a",0,2.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1367/2",1935,1935,"1935-08-26","resolution",null,"passed","Sutter Investment Company was refunded $6,310.94 (≈ $155,212 in 2026 dollars) in excess taxes caused by an Assessor's office clerical error.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1367,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1360",null,"Refund of Excess Taxes Collected. (Code No. 9.059) On recommendation of the Finance Committee.",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:666/1",1936,1936,"1936-05-15","communication",null,"amended","Twelve General Clerks to be added to the Assessor's Office and seven to the Tax Collector's Office in the budget at set monthly salaries; amended, no final vote found","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",666,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n666",null,"Communication from Mayor re: Assessor and Tax Collector. The following was read by the Clerk",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:737/2",1937,1937,"1937-05-20","other",null,"passed","The Assessor's office budget index was passed as recommended, with new machine operator positions and reclassifications, without objection.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",737,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n728",null,"Assessors (Index No. 3). Supervisor Shannon explained that the only changes in this department",null,null,"n","a",0,6.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:1812/2",1937,1937,"1937-10-04","ordinance",null,"passed","Finance Committee recommends adding a part-time storekeeper position at $79.50 (≈ $1,860 in 2026 dollars) monthly to the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",1812,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n1803",null,"Amending Salary Ordinance, Assessor — Storekeeper. (Code No. 9.053) Bill No. 1451, Ordinance No. 9.053113, as follows",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:1848/2",1937,1937,"1937-10-18","ordinance",null,"passed","Proposed amendment to the Salary Ordinance adds a part-time Storekeeper post at $79.50 (≈ $1,860 in 2026 dollars) a month in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",1848,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n1839",null,"Amending Salary Ordinance, Assessor-Storekeeper. (Code No. 9.053) Also. Bill No. 1451, Ordinance No. 9.053113, as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed33sanfrich:296/3",1938,1938,"1938-02-14","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Board passed on first reading $930 (≈ $22,224 in 2026 dollars) to create a key punch operator job in the Assessor's Office.","quoted","journalofproceed33sanfrich",296,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed33sanfrich/page/n296",null,"Appropriation of $930 Tabulating Alphabet Key Punch Operator, Assessor's Office. (Code No. 9.051) On motion of Supervisor Shannon: Also, Bill No. 1529",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed33sanfrich:337/2",1938,1938,"1938-02-28","ordinance",null,"passed","Board passed a $930 (≈ $22,224 in 2026 dollars) supplemental appropriation creating one Tabulating Key Punch Operator position in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed33sanfrich",337,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed33sanfrich/page/n337",null,"Appropriation of $930 — Additional Position, Tabulating Key Punch Operator. (Code No. 9.051)",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed33sanfrich:544/3",1938,1938,"1938-04-25","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Ordinance adding a part-time storekeeper position to the Assessor's Office salary schedule passed for second reading.","quoted","journalofproceed33sanfrich",544,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed33sanfrich/page/n544",null,"Amendment to Salary Ordinance, Assessor's Office. (Code No. 9.053)",null,null,"n","a",0,1.8],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed33sanfrich:545/1",1938,1938,"1938-04-25","ordinance",null,"passed","Final passage given to adding a part-time storekeeper at $79.50 (≈ $1,900 in 2026 dollars) a month to the Assessor's Office salary schedule.","quoted","journalofproceed33sanfrich",545,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed33sanfrich/page/n545",null,"Amendment to Salary Ordinance, Assessor's Office. (Code No. 9.053)",null,null,"n","a",0,2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed33sanfrich:611/2",1938,1938,"1938-05-09","ordinance",null,"passed","Finance Committee recommends adding a part-time Storekeeper at $79.50 (≈ $1,900 in 2026 dollars) a month to the Assessor's Office salary ordinance.","quoted","journalofproceed33sanfrich",611,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed33sanfrich/page/n611",null,"Amendment to Salary Ordinance, Assessor's Office. (Code No. 9.053) Bill No. 1563",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed34sanfrich:146/2",1939,1939,"1939-01-16","ordinance",null,"passed","Proposed ordinance creates a $2,000 (≈ $48,481 in 2026 dollars) change fund for the Assessor's office and repeals Ordinance 9.0112.","quoted","journalofproceed34sanfrich",146,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed34sanfrich/page/n144",null,"Creating Revolving Fund for Office of Assessor, and Repealing Ordinance No. 9.0112, Creating Present Assessor's Revolving Fund",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed35sanfrich:40/2",1940,1940,"1940-01-08","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Proposed ordinance adds $20,700 (≈ $498,190 in 2026 dollars) in Assessor's Office positions for January to June 1940.","quoted","journalofproceed35sanfrich",40,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed35sanfrich/page/n40",null,"Appropriating the Sum of $20,700 Out of Surplus Existing in Appropriation No. 903.102.00",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed35sanfrich:41/2",1940,1940,"1940-01-08","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Ordinance proposed to add Assessor's office positions by amending an earlier 1939 staffing ordinance.","quoted","journalofproceed35sanfrich",41,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed35sanfrich/page/n41",null,"An Ordinance Amending Bill 192, Ordinance 186, Section 5 (Assessor) by Increasing the Number of",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed35sanfrich:185/2",1940,1940,"1940-01-22","ordinance",null,"passed","Ordinance passed appropriating $20,700 (≈ $498,190 in 2026 dollars) to create new Assessor's office positions for January to June 1940.","quoted","journalofproceed35sanfrich",185,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed35sanfrich/page/n185",null,"Appropriating the Sum of $20,700 Out of Surplus Existing in Appropriation No. 903.102.00 to the Credit",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed35sanfrich:186/1",1940,1940,"1940-01-22","ordinance",null,null,"Proposed ordinance amending Bill 192's Assessor salary schedule, increasing positions and adding new staff classes in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed35sanfrich",186,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed35sanfrich/page/n186",null,"An Ordinance Amending Bill 192, Ordinance 186, Section 5 (Asses- sor) by Increasing the Number",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed35sanfrich:864/2",1940,1940,"1940-04-29","ordinance",null,null,"$262.50 (≈ $6,318 in 2026 dollars) to be appropriated to create a Senior Tabulating Machine Operator post in the Assessor's office and abolish another; passed first reading only, later finally passed","quoted","journalofproceed35sanfrich",864,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed35sanfrich/page/n864",null,"Authorizing an Appropriation of $262.50 Out of Surplus Existing in Appropriation 903.101.00",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed35sanfrich:866/1",1940,1940,"1940-04-29","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Ordinance adding a $175 (≈ $4,212 in 2026 dollars)-a-month senior tabulating operator job in the Assessor's office passed for second reading.","quoted","journalofproceed35sanfrich",866,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed35sanfrich/page/n866",null,"An Ordinance Amending Bill 192, Ordinance 186, Section 5, Assessor, by Decreasing the Number of Employments Under Item 15 from 4 to 3,",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed35sanfrich:960/2",1940,1940,"1940-05-13","ordinance",null,null,"Proposed $262.50 (≈ $6,318 in 2026 dollars) appropriation creating a senior tabulating machine operator position in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed35sanfrich",960,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed35sanfrich/page/n960",null,"Authorizing an Appropriation of $262.50 Out of Surplus Existing in Appropriation 903.101.00 to the Credit of",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed35sanfrich:1017/2",1940,1940,"1940-05-20","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Proposed ordinance changing a class number in the Assessor's office pay schedule; outcome appears on the next page.","quoted","journalofproceed35sanfrich",1017,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed35sanfrich/page/n1017",null,"An Ordinance Amending Bill 192, Ordinance 186, Section 5 Assessor By Changing the Class Number Under Item 15.1.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed35sanfrich:1118/1",1940,1940,"1940-05-24","other",null,"passed","Board approved the Mayor's recommendation to create a Marine Valuation Department in the Assessor's Office, adding staff and funds.","quoted","journalofproceed35sanfrich",1118,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed35sanfrich/page/n1118",null,"Approval of Mayor's Supplemental Recommendation With Respect to Maritime Valuation Department",null,null,"n","a",0,5.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed35sanfrich:1428/2",1940,1940,"1940-06-03","ordinance",null,null,"Changes a class number in the Assessor's Office pay schedule; the final vote is not shown on this page.","quoted","journalofproceed35sanfrich",1428,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed35sanfrich/page/n1428",null,"An Ordinance Amending Bill 192, Ordinance 186, Section 5 Assessor By Changing the Class Number Under Item 15.1.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed35sanfrich:2185/1",1940,1940,"1940-09-03","ordinance",null,"passed","Board passed a $19,305 (≈ $464,616 in 2026 dollars) supplemental appropriation to create new Assessor's Office positions, funded from surplus in another account.","quoted","journalofproceed35sanfrich",2185,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed35sanfrich/page/n2185",null,"Appropriation No. 003.110.00 for the Purpose of Providing Funds For the Compensation of Certain Positions Which Are Hereby Created in the Assessor's Office.",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed35sanfrich:2185/2",1940,1940,"1940-09-03","ordinance",null,"passed","Proposed ordinance would amend Ordinance 662 to add and increase Assessor's Office employment positions.","quoted","journalofproceed35sanfrich",2185,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed35sanfrich/page/n2185",null,"An Amendment to Ordinance 662, Section 5, Assessor, by Increasing the Number of Employments Under Items 15, 17.1, 21, 24.1, 26.1",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed36sanfrich:755/3",1941,1941,"1941-05-05","ordinance",null,null,"Proposed ordinance would fund a $250 (≈ $5,730 in 2026 dollars)-a-month administrative assistant post in the Assessor's Office, abolishing an executive secretary post.","quoted","journalofproceed36sanfrich",755,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed36sanfrich/page/n752",null,"Appropriating the Sum of $675 and Creating the Position of One G21 Administrative Assistant at",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed36sanfrich:756/2",1941,1941,"1941-05-05","ordinance",null,null,"Proposed ordinance reappropriates $1,050 (≈ $24,067 in 2026 dollars) to create a Supervisor of Real Property position in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed36sanfrich",756,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed36sanfrich/page/n753",null,"Reappropriating $1050 From Surplus Existing in Assessor Permanent Salaries Fund, Creating the Position of One Supervisor of Real Property",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed36sanfrich:757/2",1941,1941,"1941-05-05","ordinance",null,"passed","Proposed emergency amendment reclassifying an Assessor's office clerk post as a Supervisor of Real Property Records; final vote continues.","quoted","journalofproceed36sanfrich",757,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed36sanfrich/page/n754",null,"Amendment to Salary Ordinance, Assessor, by Changing Class Number and Class Title Under Item 11 From B234 Head Clerk",null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed36sanfrich:915/5",1941,1941,"1941-05-20","other",null,"passed","The Board approved proposed salary increases in the Assessor's office, not previously approved, by a vote of six to four.","quoted","journalofproceed36sanfrich",915,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed36sanfrich/page/n912",null,"Index 3, Assessor Supervisor Shannon reported in detail proposed salary increases",null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed36sanfrich:918/1",1941,1941,"1941-05-20","motion",null,"refused","Motion to add $480 (≈ $11,002 in 2026 dollars) for hire of automobiles for the Assessor's office was ruled out of order.","quoted","journalofproceed36sanfrich",918,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed36sanfrich/page/n915",null,"Supervisor I'hl. seconded b.v Supervisor Colman. moved that there be included in the .Assessor's budget an item",null,null,"n","a",0,2.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed36sanfrich:918/2",1941,1941,"1941-05-20","other",null,"passed","Assessor's office budget approved; the requested automobile for the office was not included.","unverified","journalofproceed36sanfrich",918,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed36sanfrich/page/n915",null,"Approval of Assessor's Budget Whereupon, Supervisor Shannon, seconded by Supervisor McC.ow;iii. moved approval",null,null,"n","a",0,4.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed36sanfrich:1550/1",1941,1941,"1941-06-30","ordinance",null,"passed","Board passed an emergency ordinance reclassifying one Assessor's office clerk position as General Clerk-Stenographer at $155 (≈ $3,553 in 2026 dollars) monthly.","quoted","journalofproceed36sanfrich",1550,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed36sanfrich/page/n1547",null,"Amending Annual Salary Ordinance Assessor — Substituting One General Clerk-Stenographer for One General Clerk-Typist, Both at SI 55.00",null,null,"n","a",0,5.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed36sanfrich:1551/1",1941,1941,"1941-06-30","ordinance",null,"passed","Assessor's office position changed from General Clerk-Typist to General Clerk-Stenographer at $155 (≈ $3,553 in 2026 dollars) monthly, passed as an emergency ordinance.","quoted","journalofproceed36sanfrich",1551,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed36sanfrich/page/n1548",null,"Amending Annual Salary Ordinance Assessor — Substituting One General Clerk-Stenographer for One General Clerk-Typist, Both at $155.00",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed36sanfrich:1619/2",1941,1941,"1941-07-14","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Assessor's office gets $1,860 (≈ $42,633 in 2026 dollars) to replace a clerk-typist post with a clerk-stenographer; passed for second reading.","quoted","journalofproceed36sanfrich",1619,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed36sanfrich/page/n1616",null,"Appropriating $1860.00, Assessor. Substituting One General Clerk-Stenographer for One General Clerk-Typist, Both at $155.00",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed36sanfrich|605",1941,1941,"1941-07-14","ordinance","public-money","passed first reading","Stenographer post proposed for the Assessor's office, typist post dropped","unverified","journalofproceed36sanfrich",1619,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed36sanfrich/page/n1616",null,"Ordinance No , as follows: Appropriating the sum of $1,860.00 out of the surplus existing in Appropriation Xo. 103.110.00 to the credit of Appropriation Xo. 103.110.00. creating the position of one B40S Genera! Clerk-Stenographer at $155.00 per month in the office of the Assessor and pi'oviding fund",null,null,"n","a",0,1.32],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed36sanfrich:1718/2",1941,1941,"1941-07-28","ordinance",null,null,"Assessor's office proposed to fund $1,860 (≈ $42,633 in 2026 dollars) for a General Clerk-Stenographer post, replacing a General Clerk-Typist.","quoted","journalofproceed36sanfrich",1718,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed36sanfrich/page/n1715",null,"Appropriating $1860.00, Assessor. Substituting One General Clerk-Stenographer for One General Clerk-Typist, Both at $155.00",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed37sanfrich:396/2",1942,1942,"1942-03-09","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","The Board passed on second reading an ordinance appropriating $4,750 (≈ $98,188 in 2026 dollars) to create five land appraiser positions in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed37sanfrich",396,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed37sanfrich/page/n393",null,"Appropriating $4,750.00, Assessor, for Five New Positions of Land Appraiser at $190.00 per Month",null,null,"n","a",0,2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed37sanfrich:454/2",1942,1942,"1942-03-23","ordinance",null,"passed","The Assessor's office gets $4,750 (≈ $98,188 in 2026 dollars) to hire five land appraisers at $190 (≈ $3,928 in 2026 dollars) a month; finally passed.","quoted","journalofproceed37sanfrich",454,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed37sanfrich/page/n451",null,"Appropriating $4,750.00, Assessor, for Five New Positions of Land Appraiser at $190.00 per Month",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed37sanfrich:641/2",1942,1942,"1942-04-13","ordinance",null,"passed","Emergency ordinance appropriating $462.50 (≈ $9,560 in 2026 dollars) to create a probate estates appraiser position in the Assessor's office was finally passed.","quoted","journalofproceed37sanfrich",641,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed37sanfrich/page/n638",null,"Appropriating $462.50, Assessor for New Position of Warehouse and Probate Estates Appraiser",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed37sanfrich:642/1",1942,1942,"1942-04-13","ordinance",null,"passed","Assessor's office gets $462.50 (≈ $9,560 in 2026 dollars) to create a warehouse and probate estates appraiser position, adopted as an emergency ordinance.","quoted","journalofproceed37sanfrich",642,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed37sanfrich/page/n639",null,"Appropriating $462.50, Assessor for New Position of Warehouse and Probate Estates Appraiser at $185",null,null,"n","a",0,1.8],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed37sanfrich:1228/4",1942,1942,"1942-05-25","other",null,"passed","Assessor's office receives $3,000 (≈ $62,014 in 2026 dollars) for employee car allowances, while the Finance Committee rejected the six salary increases.","quoted","journalofproceed37sanfrich",1228,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed37sanfrich/page/n1225",null,"Approval of Supplemental Budget, Assessor, Index 3 Supplemental budget for Assessor, Index 3, to increase salaries for six employees, and to provide car allowance",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed38sanfrich:582/3",1943,1943,"1943-03-12","other",null,"passed","Salary range for Director of Service in the Assessor's Office set at $275 (≈ $5,356 in 2026 dollars) to $350 (≈ $6,817 in 2026 dollars).","quoted","journalofproceed38sanfrich",582,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed38sanfrich/page/n582",null,"B235 — Director of Service, Assessor's Office. Mr. Frank Moitoza objected to the proposed salary range.",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed38sanfrich:583/8",1943,1943,"1943-03-12","other",null,"passed","Salary range of $260 (≈ $5,064 in 2026 dollars) to $325 (≈ $6,330 in 2026 dollars) set for the Supervisor of Personal Property Records in the Assessor's Office.","quoted","journalofproceed38sanfrich",583,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed38sanfrich/page/n583",null,"BlOl — Supervisor of Personal Property Records, Assessor's Office. Supervisor Meyer, seconded by Supervisor Gartland, moved",null,null,"n","a",0,2.8],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed38sanfrich:688/2",1943,1943,"1943-03-22","ordinance",null,"passed","Emergency $3,000 (≈ $58,429 in 2026 dollars) appropriation for Assessor's Office auto allowances for 1943 property valuation was finally passed.","quoted","journalofproceed38sanfrich",688,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed38sanfrich/page/n688",null,"Appropriating $3,000 From Emergency Reserve Fund to Credit of Appropriation No. 233.203.03 to Provide Funds",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed38part2sanfrich:261/5",1943,1943,"1943-05-19","other",null,"passed","Assessor's office received $15,000 (≈ $292,145 in 2026 dollars) more for temporary salaries and $900 (≈ $17,529 in 2026 dollars) for office equipment rental, approved without objection.","quoted","journalofproceed38part2sanfrich",261,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed38part2sanfrich/page/n261",null,"Index No. 3 — Assessor. Increase of $15,000 for temporary salaries and increase of $900 for rental of office equipment.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed38part2sanfrich:764/2",1943,1943,"1943-06-07","ordinance",null,"referred","Reappropriation of $180 (≈ $3,506 in 2026 dollars) for an Assessor's Office subscription to Edwards Abstract was referred to the Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed38part2sanfrich",764,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed38part2sanfrich/page/n764",null,"Reappropriating the Sum of $180 From the Surplus Existing in Appropriation No. 203.110.00, Permanent Salaries, Assessor's Office",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed38part2sanfrich:798/1",1943,1943,"1943-06-14","ordinance",null,"passed","Assessor's Office funds of $180 (≈ $3,506 in 2026 dollars) reappropriated for a subscription to Edwards Abstract, a daily property-transfer report.","quoted","journalofproceed38part2sanfrich",798,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed38part2sanfrich/page/n798",null,"Reappropriating $180 From Permanent Salaries, Assessor's Office, to Provide Funds Balance of Fiscal Year for Subscription to Edwards Abstract",null,null,"n","a",0,1.8],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed38part2sanfrich|89",1943,1943,"1943-06-14","ordinance",null,"passed","Extra money approved to keep Assessor's Office running","unverified","journalofproceed38part2sanfrich",798,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed38part2sanfrich/page/n798",null,"Ordinance having proved insufficient and therefore said appropriation is necessary for the said uninterrupted operation of the Assessor's Office. Recommended by the Assessor. Approved as to funds available by the Controller. Approved as to form by the City Attorney. Approved by the Mayor. Finally Pa",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed38part3sanfrich:54/2",1943,1943,"1943-07-06","ordinance",null,"passed","Board passed an emergency ordinance funding two land appraiser salaries in the Assessor's office and abolishing one appraiser position.","quoted","journalofproceed38part3sanfrich",54,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed38part3sanfrich/page/n54",null,"Appropriating $2,580 From Appropriation No. 302.112.00, Reserve for Military and War Leaves;",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed38part3sanfrich:55/1",1943,1943,"1943-07-06","ordinance",null,"passed","Board finally passed a bill funding and creating a Supervising Land Appraiser post in the Assessor's office, abolishing one Land Appraiser post.","quoted","journalofproceed38part3sanfrich",55,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed38part3sanfrich/page/n55",null,"Appropriating the sum of $2,580 from Appropriation No. 302.112.00, Reserve for Military and War Leaves;",null,null,"n","a",0,2.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed38part3sanfrich:55/2",1943,1943,"1943-07-06","ordinance",null,"passed","Board passed a salary ordinance amendment moving one Land Appraiser position within the Assessor's office, with the Finance Committee's approval.","quoted","journalofproceed38part3sanfrich",55,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed38part3sanfrich/page/n55",null,"Amending Section 5.1 of Salary Ordinance, Assessor, by Decreasing Number of Positions Under Item 22.4 From 2 to 1 Land Appraiser",null,null,"n","a",0,2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed38part3sanfrich:56/1",1943,1943,"1943-07-06","ordinance",null,"passed","Assessor's office salary ordinance adjusts land appraiser positions and returns an employee from military leave; passed as an emergency measure.","quoted","journalofproceed38part3sanfrich",56,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed38part3sanfrich/page/n56",null,"Amending Section 5.1 of Salary Ordinance, Assessor, by Decreasing Number of Positions Under Item 22.4",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed39sanfrich:182/3",1944,1944,"1944-01-24","ordinance",null,null,"Ordinance proposed to appropriate $750 (≈ $14,358 in 2026 dollars) from surplus to pay a clerk-typist position created in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed39sanfrich",182,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed39sanfrich/page/n182",null,"Appropriating $750 Out of Surplus Existing in Appropriation No. 303.120.00 to Provide Funds for the Compensation of One",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed39sanfrich:216/2",1944,1944,"1944-01-31","resolution",null,"passed","Controller transferred $907.50 (≈ $17,373 in 2026 dollars) from the military leave reserve to pay a returning Assessor's Office employee.","quoted","journalofproceed39sanfrich",216,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed39sanfrich/page/n216",null,"Transfer of Funds from Reserve for Military Leaves to Compensate Employees in Assessor's",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed39sanfrich:258/2",1944,1944,"1944-02-07","ordinance",null,"passed","Passed final: $750 (≈ $14,358 in 2026 dollars) from surplus funds pay for a new general clerk-typist position in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed39sanfrich",258,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed39sanfrich/page/n258",null,"Appropriating $750 Out of Surplus Existing in Appropriation No. 303.120.00 to Provide Funds for the",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed39sanfrich|43",1944,1944,"1944-02-07","ordinance","public-money","passed","$750 (≈ $14,358 in 2026 dollars) voted for a new clerk-typist in the Assessor's office","unverified","journalofproceed39sanfrich",258,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed39sanfrich/page/n258",null,"Ordinance No. 2598, as follows: Appropriating the sum of $750 out of the surplus existing in Appropriation No. 303.120.00 to provide funds for the compensation of 1 B512 General Clerk-Typist at $150 per month, which position is created in the office of the Assessor. Be it ordained by the People of t",null,null,"n","a",0,1.47],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed39sanfrich:324/2",1944,1944,"1944-02-21","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Assessor's Office would add a General Clerk-Typist position at $150 (≈ $2,872 in 2026 dollars) a month and return an employee from military leave.","quoted","journalofproceed39sanfrich",324,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed39sanfrich/page/n324",null,"Providing for Return to Duty of Employee on Military Leave, Assessor's Office, and Adding New Employment",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed39sanfrich:393/2",1944,1944,"1944-03-06","ordinance",null,null,"Ordinance proposed to return an Assessor's Office employee from military leave and add a General Clerk-Typist at $150 (≈ $2,872 in 2026 dollars) monthly.","quoted","journalofproceed39sanfrich",393,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed39sanfrich/page/n393",null,"Providing for Return to Duty of Employee on Military Leave, Assessor's Office, and Adding New",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed40sanfrich:544/2",1945,1945,"1945-03-12","ordinance",null,"passed","An emergency ordinance appropriated $2,400 (≈ $44,925 in 2026 dollars) for Assessor's office staff working Saturday mornings during the busy season, and was finally passed.","quoted","journalofproceed40sanfrich",544,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed40sanfrich/page/n544",null,"Appropriating ^2,400 From General Fund Compensation Reserve, Appropriation 460.199.00, to Provide Funds for Payment of Over- time",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed40sanfrich:691/1",1945,1945,"1945-03-26","ordinance",null,"passed","Final passage given to a salary change letting Assessor's Office staff work over 40-hour weeks in spring months.","quoted","journalofproceed40sanfrich",691,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed40sanfrich/page/n691",null,"Amending Salary Ordinance, Section 2.3.25, by Providing That Employees in the Assessor's Office Be Entitled to Work in Excess of 40 Hours a Week",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed40sanfrich:691/2",1945,1945,"1945-03-26","ordinance",null,null,"Proposed $6,200 (≈ $116,057 in 2026 dollars) emergency overtime fund for Assessor's Office staff working Saturday mornings in April through June.","quoted","journalofproceed40sanfrich",691,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed40sanfrich/page/n691",null,"Appropriating $6,200 From General Fund Compensation Reserve to Provide Funds for Payment of Overtime to Monthly Employees of the Assessor's Office",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed40sanfrich:760/3",1945,1945,"1945-04-09","ordinance",null,null,"Proposed ordinance would let Assessor's Office employees work over 40 hours a week during March through June.","quoted","journalofproceed40sanfrich",760,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed40sanfrich/page/n760",null,"Amending Salary Ordinance, Section 2.3.25, by Providing That Employees in the Assessor's Office Be Entitled to Work in Excess of 40 Hours",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed40part2sanfrich:575/1",1945,1945,"1945-06-11","ordinance",null,"passed","Emergency ordinance passed moving $4,552 (≈ $85,208 in 2026 dollars) from the Emergency Reserve Fund to pay Assessor's office contract and office costs.","quoted","journalofproceed40part2sanfrich",575,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed40part2sanfrich/page/n575",null,"Appropriating $4,552 From the Surplus Existing in the Emergency Reserve Fund for Various Contractual Service",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed412sanfrich:626/1",1946,1946,"1946-02-27","appointment",null,"referred","Board referred the Director of Services post in the Assessor's Office to Civil Service Commission with a proposed salary range of $330 (≈ $5,702 in 2026 dollars)-400.","quoted","journalofproceed412sanfrich",626,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed412sanfrich/page/n626",null,"B235  Director  of  Services^  Assessor's  Office.  Supervisor  Meyer,  seconded  by  Supervisor  Sullivan,  moved  reference  to  Civil  Service Commission,",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed412sanfrich:2099/2",1946,1946,"1946-06-03","ordinance",null,null,"Proposed $7,500 (≈ $129,592 in 2026 dollars) from the emergency reserve to pay temporary salaries in the Assessor's office to finish the assessment roll.","quoted","journalofproceed412sanfrich",2099,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed412sanfrich/page/n2099",null,"Appropriating $7,500, Assessor, for Temporary Salaries; an Emergency Ordinance.",null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed412sanfrich:2346/2",1946,1946,"1946-06-24","ordinance",null,null,"Emergency appropriation of $2,400 (≈ $41,470 in 2026 dollars) to the Assessor's Office for car transport for appraisers to finish the 1946-1947 assessment roll.","quoted","journalofproceed412sanfrich",2346,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed412sanfrich/page/n2346",null,"Appropriating $2,400, Assessor, for Payment of Automobile Transportation for Field Appraisers and Auditors",null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed412sanfrich:2348/1",1946,1946,"1946-06-24","ordinance",null,null,"A $1,800 (≈ $31,102 in 2026 dollars) emergency appropriation for Assessor's Office overtime was refused final passage, then reconsidered.","quoted","journalofproceed412sanfrich",2348,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed412sanfrich/page/n2348",null,"Appropriating $1,800, Assessor, for Payment of Overtime to Monthly Employees; an Emergency Ordinance.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed411sanfrich:49/2",1946,1946,"1946-07-01","ordinance",null,"continued","Proposed $1,800 (≈ $31,102 in 2026 dollars) emergency appropriation from the Emergency Reserve Fund for Assessor's Office overtime pay was continued to July 1, 1946.","quoted","journalofproceed411sanfrich",49,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed411sanfrich/page/n48",null,"Appropriating §1,800, Assessor, for Payment of Overtime to Monthly Employees; an Emergency Ordinance.",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed411sanfrich:50/1",1946,1946,"1946-07-01","ordinance",null,"continued","Board refused emergency passage, then postponed for one week a $1,800 (≈ $31,102 in 2026 dollars) overtime appropriation for Assessor's office employees.","quoted","journalofproceed411sanfrich",50,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed411sanfrich/page/n49",null,"Appropriating §1,800, Assessor, for Payment of Overtime to Monthly Employees; an Emergency Ordinance.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed411sanfrich:112/2",1946,1946,"1946-07-08","ordinance",null,"continued","Emergency $1,800 (≈ $31,102 in 2026 dollars) overtime appropriation for Assessor's Office staff was continued until July 8, 1946.","quoted","journalofproceed411sanfrich",112,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed411sanfrich/page/n111",null,"Appropriating Sl,800, Assessor, for Payment of Overtime to Monthly Employees; an Emergency Ordinance.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed411sanfrich:113/1",1946,1946,"1946-07-08","ordinance",null,"passed","The Assessor's Office gets $1,800 (≈ $31,102 in 2026 dollars) from the Emergency Reserve Fund to pay monthly employees overtime, passed as an emergency ordinance.","quoted","journalofproceed411sanfrich",113,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed411sanfrich/page/n112",null,"Appropriating Sl,800, Assessor, for Payment of Overtime to Monthly Employees; an Emergency Ordinance.",null,null,"n","a",0,1.8],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed411sanfrich:1319/1",1946,1946,"1946-11-25","resolution",null,"passed","The Board adopted a resolution mourning Andrew Kenny, a longtime Assessor's Office employee, and sent condolences to his widow.","quoted","journalofproceed411sanfrich",1319,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed411sanfrich/page/n1316",null,"In Memoriam — Andrew Kenny. Supervisor Gallagher presented: Proposal No. 6260, Resolution No. 6038 (Series of 1939)",null,null,"n","a",0,1.8],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed411sanfrich:1355/3",1946,1946,"1946-12-02","ordinance",null,"continued","Salary ordinance change adding IBM to Assessor's Office job titles was continued to December 9, 1946.","quoted","journalofproceed411sanfrich",1355,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed411sanfrich/page/n1352",null,"Amending Annual Salary Ordinance, Assessor, by Adding \"IBM\" to Class Titles of Key Punch Operator, Tabulating Machine Operator,",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed411sanfrich:1400/2",1946,1946,"1946-12-09","ordinance",null,null,"Bill 4442 proposed adding IBM to several Assessor's Office class titles; the vote continues on the next page.","quoted","journalofproceed411sanfrich",1400,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed411sanfrich/page/n1397",null,"Amending Annual Salary Ordinance, Assessor, by Adding \"IBM\" to Class Titles of Key Punch Operator, Tabulating Machine Operator,",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed42sanfrich:459/1",1947,1947,"1947-03-03","motion",null,"passed","Salary range of $295 (≈ $4,457 in 2026 dollars)-365 a month proposed for the Director of Service in the Assessor's Office, carried by vote.","quoted","journalofproceed42sanfrich",459,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed42sanfrich/page/n459",null,"B235, Director of Service, Assessor's Office — Supervisor Mead moved, seconded by Supervisor Meyer, a proposed range of $295-365",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed42sanfrich:1381/2",1947,1947,"1947-05-19","ordinance",null,"passed","Ordinance proposes $18,000 (≈ $271,970 in 2026 dollars) from the Emergency Reserve for temporary Assessor's Office salaries; outcome continues on next page.","quoted","journalofproceed42sanfrich",1381,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed42sanfrich/page/n1381",null,"Appropriating $18,000 From Emergency Reserve for Temporary Salaries, Assessor's Office, for Remainder of Fiscal Year",null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed42sanfrich:1524/2",1947,1947,"1947-06-09","ordinance",null,"passed","The Assessor's Office gets $535 (≈ $8,084 in 2026 dollars) from the emergency reserve fund for postage; finally passed.","quoted","journalofproceed42sanfrich",1524,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed42sanfrich/page/n1524",null,"Appropriating the Sum of $535 Out of the Emergency Reserve Fund to Provide Funds for Postage in the Assessor's",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed43sanfrich:43/4",1948,1948,"1948-01-19","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Assessor's office would receive $925 (≈ $12,932 in 2026 dollars) to fund one new General Clerk-Typist position; passed for second reading.","quoted","journalofproceed43sanfrich",43,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed43sanfrich/page/n42",null,"Appropriating $925, Assessor, to Provide Funds for One New Posi- sion of General Clerk-Typist",null,null,"n","a",0,1.8],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed43sanfrich:69/2",1948,1948,"1948-02-02","ordinance",null,"passed","Board finally passed an ordinance appropriating $925 (≈ $12,932 in 2026 dollars) for one new clerk-typist position in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed43sanfrich",69,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed43sanfrich/page/n68",null,"Appropriating $925, Assessor, to Provide Funds for One New Position of General Clerk-Typist",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed43sanfrich:163/2",1948,1948,"1948-03-08","ordinance",null,"passed","Board finally passed a $647.50 (≈ $9,053 in 2026 dollars) appropriation creating a clerk-typist post in the Assessor's office and abolishing a stenographer post.","quoted","journalofproceed43sanfrich",163,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed43sanfrich/page/n162",null,"Appropriating $647.50, Assessor, to Provide Funds for New Position of General Clerk-Typist at $185-230 Per Month and Abolishing Position of General Clerk-Stenographer",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed43sanfrich:163/3",1948,1948,"1948-03-08","ordinance",null,"passed","Board finally passed an amendment to the Annual Salary Ordinance swapping a stenographer post for a clerk-typist post in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed43sanfrich",163,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed43sanfrich/page/n162",null,"Amending Annual Salary Ordinance A Companion Measure to the Preceding Item",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed43sanfrich:330/2",1948,1948,"1948-05-03","ordinance",null,"passed","Board passed $370 (≈ $5,173 in 2026 dollars) for the Assessor's office to create a clerk-typist post and abolish a stenographer post.","quoted","journalofproceed43sanfrich",330,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed43sanfrich/page/n329",null,"Appropriating $370, Assessor, to Provide Funds for Creation of Position of General Clerk-Typist at $185-230 Per Month",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed43sanfrich:330/3",1948,1948,"1948-05-03","ordinance",null,"passed","Board passed an annual salary ordinance change for the Assessor's office, deleting a stenographer post and adding a clerk-typist post.","quoted","journalofproceed43sanfrich",330,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed43sanfrich/page/n329",null,"Amending Annual Salary Ordinance, Assessor — A Companion Measure to the Preceding Item.",null,null,"n","a",0,1.7],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed43sanfrich:370/5",1948,1948,"1948-05-17","ordinance",null,"passed","Board passed as an emergency ordinance $2,160 (≈ $30,199 in 2026 dollars) to pay Assessor's Office postage for the rest of the fiscal year.","quoted","journalofproceed43sanfrich",370,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed43sanfrich/page/n369",null,"Appropriating $2,160, to Provide Funds for the Payment of Postage in the Assessor's Office for the Balance",null,null,"n","a",0,1.8],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed43sanfrich:371/1",1948,1948,"1948-05-17","ordinance",null,"passed","Ordinance appropriating $2,160 (≈ $30,199 in 2026 dollars) for Assessor's Office postage was finally passed.","quoted","journalofproceed43sanfrich",371,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed43sanfrich/page/n370",null,"Appropriating $2,160, to Provide Funds for the Payment of Postage in the Assessor's Office",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed43sanfrich:702/3",1948,1948,"1948-08-30","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Ordinance passed for second reading to add a $1,900 (≈ $26,564 in 2026 dollars) clerk-typist position in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed43sanfrich",702,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed43sanfrich/page/n699",null,"Appropriating $1,900, Assessor, to Provide Funds for New Position of General Clerk-Typist at $200-250 Per Month, and Abolishing Position",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed43sanfrich:739/5",1948,1948,"1948-09-13","ordinance",null,"passed","The Board finally passed $1,900 (≈ $26,564 in 2026 dollars) to create a general clerk-typist position in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed43sanfrich",739,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed43sanfrich/page/n736",null,"Appropriating $1,900. Assessor, to Provide Funds for New Position of General Clerk-Typist at $200-250 Per Month",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed44sanfrich:148/5",1949,1949,"1949-02-21","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Ordinance appropriating $945 (≈ $13,378 in 2026 dollars) for a senior tabulating machine operator in the Assessor's office passed for second reading.","quoted","journalofproceed44sanfrich",148,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed44sanfrich/page/n145",null,"Appropriating $945, Assessor, for Compensation of Senior Tabulating Machine Operator at",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed44sanfrich:148/6",1949,1949,"1949-02-21","ordinance",null,null,"Ordinance amending the Annual Salary Ordinance for the Assessor's office, companion to the $945 (≈ $13,378 in 2026 dollars) appropriation, proposed.","quoted","journalofproceed44sanfrich",148,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed44sanfrich/page/n145",null,"Amending Annual Salary Ordinance, Assessor — A Companion Measure to the Preceding Item.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed44sanfrich:179/4",1949,1949,"1949-03-07","ordinance",null,"passed","Board finally passed $945 (≈ $13,378 in 2026 dollars) to create a senior tabulating machine operator post in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed44sanfrich",179,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed44sanfrich/page/n176",null,"Appropriating $945, Assessor, for Compensation of Senior Tabulating Machine Operator at $270-330 Per Month, Which Position Is Hereby Created;",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed44sanfrich:179/5",1949,1949,"1949-03-07","ordinance",null,"passed","Board finally passed an amendment to the annual salary ordinance for the Assessor's office, matching the preceding item.","quoted","journalofproceed44sanfrich",179,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed44sanfrich/page/n176",null,"Amending Annual Salary Ordinance, Assessor — a Companion Measure to the Preceding Item.",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed44sanfrich:354/6",1949,1949,"1949-05-02","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Proposed $400 (≈ $5,663 in 2026 dollars) for a general clerk-typist position in the Assessor's office passed for second reading.","quoted","journalofproceed44sanfrich",354,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed44sanfrich/page/n351",null,"Appropriating $400, Assessor, for New Position of General Clerk-Typist at $200-250 Per Month",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed44sanfrich:389/3",1949,1949,"1949-05-16","ordinance",null,"passed","Finally passed: $400 (≈ $5,663 in 2026 dollars) for a new clerk-typist post in the Assessor's office, replacing a general clerk position.","quoted","journalofproceed44sanfrich",389,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed44sanfrich/page/n386",null,"Appropriating $400, Assessor, for New Position of General Clerk-Typist at $200-250 Per Month",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed44sanfrich:1057/5",1949,1949,"1949-11-21","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","$4,960 (≈ $70,219 in 2026 dollars) for a new photographer and chauffeur in the Assessor's office passed for second reading, six to three.","quoted","journalofproceed44sanfrich",1057,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed44sanfrich/page/n1054",null,"Appropriating $4,960, Assessor, for One New Position of Photographer at $310 per Month, and One New Position",null,null,"n","a",0,3.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed45sanfrich:152/4",1950,1950,"1950-02-14","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Ordinance appropriating $800 (≈ $11,185 in 2026 dollars) for a new general clerk-stenographer position in the Assessor's office passed for second reading.","quoted","journalofproceed45sanfrich",152,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed45sanfrich/page/n149",null,"Appropriating $800, Assessor, for New Position of General Clerk-Stenographer at rate of $200-250 per Month",null,null,"n","a",0,1.8],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed45sanfrich:152/5",1950,1950,"1950-02-14","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Companion ordinance amending the Annual Salary Ordinance for the Assessor's office passed for second reading.","quoted","journalofproceed45sanfrich",152,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed45sanfrich/page/n149",null,"Amending the Annual Salary Ordinance, Section 5, Assessor — A Companion Measure to the Preceding Item",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed45sanfrich:180/3",1950,1950,"1950-02-27","ordinance",null,"passed","Board finally passed an $800 (≈ $11,185 in 2026 dollars) appropriation creating a clerk-stenographer post in the Assessor's office, replacing a clerk-typist position.","quoted","journalofproceed45sanfrich",180,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed45sanfrich/page/n177",null,"Appropriating $800, Assessor, for New Position of General Clerk-Stenographer; Abolishing Position of General Clerk-Typist",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed45sanfrich:351/6",1950,1950,"1950-04-10","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Appropriates $500 (≈ $6,990 in 2026 dollars) for a new Senior Clerk position in the Assessor's office; passed for second reading.","quoted","journalofproceed45sanfrich",351,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed45sanfrich/page/n348",null,"Appropriating $500. Assessor, for New Position of Senior Clerk at $250-310 per Month and Abolishing Position of General Clerk-Typist",null,null,"n","a",0,1.7],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed45sanfrich:378/3",1950,1950,"1950-04-24","ordinance",null,"passed","Assessor's office gets $500 (≈ $6,990 in 2026 dollars) to create a Senior Clerk post and drop a General Clerk-Typist post.","quoted","journalofproceed45sanfrich",378,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed45sanfrich/page/n375",null,"Appropriating $500, Assessor, for New Position of Senior Clerk at $250-310 per Month and Abolishing",null,null,"n","a",0,1.8],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed45sanfrich:767/4",1950,1950,"1950-08-14","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","The Assessor's office gets $3,000 (≈ $41,943 in 2026 dollars) for a new senior clerk post, replacing a general clerk-typist, passed on first reading.","quoted","journalofproceed45sanfrich",767,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed45sanfrich/page/n764",null,"Appropriating $3,000, Assessor, for New Position of Senior Clerk at $250-310 per Month; Abolishing Position of General Clerk-Typist",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed45sanfrich:815/5",1950,1950,"1950-08-28","ordinance",null,"passed","$3,000 (≈ $41,943 in 2026 dollars) was appropriated for a new senior clerk post in the Assessor's office, replacing a general clerk-typist position.","quoted","journalofproceed45sanfrich",815,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed45sanfrich/page/n812",null,"Appropriating $3,000, Assessor, for New Position of Senior Clerk at $250-310 per Month; Abolishing Position of General Clerk-Typist",null,null,"n","a",0,1.65],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed45sanfrich:943/5",1950,1950,"1950-10-02","resolution",null,"referred","Resolution authorizing Assessor's Office representatives to attend an Atlantic City conference was referred to the Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed45sanfrich",943,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed45sanfrich/page/n940",null,"Authorizing Attendance of Representatives of the Assessor's Office at the Meeting of the National Association of Assessing Officers",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed45sanfrich:944/1",1950,1950,"1950-10-02","resolution",null,"passed","Board adopted a resolution letting Assessor's Office representatives attend an assessors' association meeting in Atlantic City, New Jersey, October 1950.","quoted","journalofproceed45sanfrich",944,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed45sanfrich/page/n941",null,"Authorizing Attendance of Representatives of the Assessor's Office at the Meeting of the National Association of Assessing Officers, to Be Held in Atlantic City",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed46sanfrich:235/5",1951,1951,"1951-03-05","motion",null,"refused","Motion to set the Assessor's Office Director of Service salary range at $410 (≈ $5,313 in 2026 dollars)-480 failed.","quoted","journalofproceed46sanfrich",235,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed46sanfrich/page/n235",null,"B-235 Director of Service, Assessor's Office 410-480 Supervisor Mead moved, seconded by Supervisor John J. Sullivan.",null,null,"n","a",0,5.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed46sanfrich:1032/6",1951,1951,"1951-10-01","resolution",null,null,"Assessor's Office division chiefs would attend a national assessing conference in St. Louis; the Finance Committee sent it without recommendation.","quoted","journalofproceed46sanfrich",1032,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed46sanfrich/page/n1032",null,"Authorizing Attendance of the Chief, Land Valuation Division, and the Chief, Building Valuation Division, Assessor's Office, at the 17th International Conference",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed46sanfrich|757",1951,1951,"1951-10-15","ordinance","land-and-building",null,"$3,600 (≈ $46,653 in 2026 dollars) for two clerk-stenographers in the Assessor's office","unverified","journalofproceed46sanfrich",1065,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed46sanfrich/page/n1065",null,"Ordinance No (Series of 1939). (In conformity with Master Plan. Located on north side of Union Street, west of Montgomery Street. Size: 137 feet 6 inches by 137 feet 6 inches. Property formerly known as the Garfield Primary School.) Passed for Second Reading by the following vote: Ayes: Supervisors ",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed46sanfrich:1092/1",1951,1951,"1951-10-29","ordinance",null,"passed","The Board finally passed a $3,600 (≈ $46,653 in 2026 dollars) appropriation adding two clerk-stenographer positions in the Assessor's office, abolishing two clerk posts.","quoted","journalofproceed46sanfrich",1092,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed46sanfrich/page/n1092",null,"Appropriating $3,600, Assessor, for Two New Positions of General Clerk-Stenographer; Abolishing Two Positions of General Clerk.",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed47sanfrich:666/4",1952,1952,"1952-07-21","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Supervisors passed on first reading $3,720 (≈ $47,299 in 2026 dollars) for a junior draftsman post in the Assessor's office, abolishing a block book draftsman post.","quoted","journalofproceed47sanfrich",666,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed47sanfrich/page/n663",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.18],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed47sanfrich:693/6",1952,1952,"1952-08-04","ordinance",null,"passed","Passed an ordinance appropriating $3,720 (≈ $47,299 in 2026 dollars) for a new junior draftsman post in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed47sanfrich",693,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed47sanfrich/page/n690",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed47sanfrich:847/3",1952,1952,"1952-09-22","resolution",null,"passed","Board approved sending two Assessor's Office members to a national assessing officers conference in Detroit.","quoted","journalofproceed47sanfrich",847,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed47sanfrich/page/n844",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.3],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed47sanfrich:1052/1",1952,1952,"1952-12-08","ordinance",null,"passed","Board finally passed $4,200 (≈ $53,402 in 2026 dollars) to fund two Senior Clerk-Stenographer positions in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed47sanfrich",1052,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed47sanfrich/page/n1049",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.3],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:259/3",1953,1953,"1953-03-30","ordinance",null,"referred","Emergency $3,900 (≈ $49,216 in 2026 dollars) appropriation for the Assessor's Office's recorded-instrument transcripts sent to Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",259,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n259",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:418/4",1953,1953,"1953-05-11","ordinance",null,"referred","A $20,000 (≈ $252,390 in 2026 dollars) emergency appropriation from the Emergency Reserve Fund for Assessor's Office temporary salaries was referred to Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",418,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n418",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:980/4",1953,1953,"1953-11-02","resolution",null,"passed","Two Assessor's Office staff were authorized to attend a national assessing conference in New Orleans, after referral to Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",980,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n980",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.2],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed49sanfrich:348/2",1954,1954,"1954-04-05","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Assessor's office funding of $3,060 (≈ $38,328 in 2026 dollars) for three IBM machine operator positions passed for second reading.","quoted","journalofproceed49sanfrich",348,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed49sanfrich/page/n347",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed49sanfrich:368/3",1954,1954,"1954-04-12","ordinance",null,"passed","Supervisors finally passed a $3,060 (≈ $38,328 in 2026 dollars) appropriation for three IBM machine operator positions in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed49sanfrich",368,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed49sanfrich/page/n367",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed49sanfrich:368/4",1954,1954,"1954-04-12","ordinance",null,"passed","Supervisors finally passed an amendment to the Annual Salary Ordinance creating positions in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed49sanfrich",368,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed49sanfrich/page/n367",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed49sanfrich:390/3",1954,1954,"1954-04-19","ordinance",null,"passed","Board finally passes a $3,600 (≈ $45,092 in 2026 dollars) appropriation for contractual services in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed49sanfrich",390,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed49sanfrich/page/n389",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.3],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed49sanfrich:780/3",1954,1954,"1954-08-30","other",null,"referred","Two Assessor's Office staff members' attendance at a Cincinnati assessment conference was referred to the Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed49sanfrich",780,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed49sanfrich/page/n779",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed49sanfrich:1014/5",1954,1954,"1954-12-13","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Annual salary ordinance amended for the Assessor's office, companion to the clerk-typist appropriation, passed for second reading.","quoted","journalofproceed49sanfrich",1014,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed49sanfrich/page/n1013",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed50sanfrich:720/1",1955,1955,"1955-09-06","resolution",null,"passed","Two Assessor's Office staff were approved to attend an assessment conference in New York City in October 1955.","quoted","journalofproceed50sanfrich",720,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed50sanfrich/page/n719",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed51sanfrich:522/5",1956,1956,"1956-07-23","hearing",null,null,"Meyer and [name withheld] assessment application on Block 1577, Lot 6 was withdrawn by the Assessor's office and filed.","quoted","journalofproceed51sanfrich",522,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed51sanfrich/page/n521",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-5.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed52sanfrich:12/2",1957,1957,"1957-01-07","ordinance",null,"passed","Board appropriated $2,160 (≈ $25,900 in 2026 dollars) for a Veterans' Exemption Bureau supervisor post in the Assessor's office, abolishing a senior clerk post.","quoted","journalofproceed52sanfrich",12,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed52sanfrich/page/n11",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed52sanfrich:142/1",1957,1957,"1957-03-04","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Board passed on first reading a $14,500 (≈ $173,866 in 2026 dollars) appropriation for temporary salaries in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed52sanfrich",142,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed52sanfrich/page/n141",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed52sanfrich:158/4",1957,1957,"1957-03-11","ordinance",null,"passed","The Board finally passed an ordinance appropriating $14,500 (≈ $173,866 in 2026 dollars) for temporary salaries in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed52sanfrich",158,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed52sanfrich/page/n157",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed52sanfrich:302/6",1957,1957,"1957-04-29","ordinance",null,"referred","Supervisors referred a $900 (≈ $10,792 in 2026 dollars) emergency appropriation for Assessor's Office reproduction services to the Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed52sanfrich",302,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed52sanfrich/page/n301",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed52sanfrich:424/3",1957,1957,"1957-05-27","ordinance",null,"referred","Proposed $1,850 (≈ $22,183 in 2026 dollars) emergency appropriation for the Assessor's Office sent to Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed52sanfrich",424,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed52sanfrich/page/n423",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed52sanfrich:579/1",1957,1957,"1957-07-29","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Board of Supervisors passed on first reading $221,290 (≈ $2.7 million in 2026 dollars) to add 34 real property appraiser positions in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed52sanfrich",579,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed52sanfrich/page/n578",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.89],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed53sanfrich:135/1",1958,1958,"1958-03-03","ordinance",null,"passed","Assessor's office gets $1,350 (≈ $15,739 in 2026 dollars) for a general clerk-typist position, replacing a general clerk position; passed final.","quoted","journalofproceed53sanfrich",135,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed53sanfrich/page/n135",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed53sanfrich:303/4",1958,1958,"1958-05-05","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Ordinance proposed to appropriate $12,780 (≈ $149,000 in 2026 dollars) for temporary salaries in the Assessor's office, passed for second reading.","quoted","journalofproceed53sanfrich",303,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed53sanfrich/page/n303",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.8],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed53sanfrich:399/2",1958,1958,"1958-05-26","ordinance",null,"passed","Board finally passed a $4,000 (≈ $46,635 in 2026 dollars) emergency appropriation for temporary salaries in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed53sanfrich",399,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed53sanfrich/page/n399",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.7],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed53sanfrich:432/5",1958,1958,"1958-06-09","ordinance",null,"referred","A $2,645 (≈ $30,838 in 2026 dollars) emergency appropriation for temporary salaries in the Assessor's office was referred to the Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed53sanfrich",432,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed53sanfrich/page/n432",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed53sanfrich:598/5",1958,1958,"1958-08-11","resolution",null,"passed","Three Assessor's Office representatives authorized to attend the State Board of Equalization meeting in [name withheld].","quoted","journalofproceed53sanfrich",598,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed53sanfrich/page/n598",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.2],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed54sanfrich:230/3",1959,1959,"1959-04-06","ordinance",null,"passed","Assessor's office received $762.50 (≈ $8,829 in 2026 dollars) to create a clerk-typist post and abolish a general clerk post.","quoted","journalofproceed54sanfrich",230,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed54sanfrich/page/n225",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed54sanfrich:392/3",1959,1959,"1959-05-18","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","$9,650 (≈ $111,734 in 2026 dollars) for temporary salaries in the Assessor's office passed for second reading, reduced from $11,150 (≈ $129,102 in 2026 dollars).","quoted","journalofproceed54sanfrich",392,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed54sanfrich/page/n387",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.8],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed54sanfrich:403/3",1959,1959,"1959-05-25","ordinance",null,"passed","Appropriates $9,650 (≈ $111,734 in 2026 dollars) for temporary salaries in the Assessor's office.","quoted","journalofproceed54sanfrich",403,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed54sanfrich/page/n398",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed54sanfrich:662/2",1959,1959,"1959-09-08","resolution",null,"passed","The Board adopted a resolution sending six Assessor's office representatives to a state assessors' conference at San Diego.","quoted","journalofproceed54sanfrich",662,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed54sanfrich/page/n657",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.25],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:32/4",1996,1960,"1960's","project","study or report",null,"Real Property System · other: Development began; system later progressed from card-oriented to on-line with over 200 batch programs","unverified","C124914500",32,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n31",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed55sanfrich:91/1",1960,1960,"1960-02-15","resolution",null,"passed","The Assessor's Office tabulating staff were authorized to attend a county auditors' convention in Coronado, February 17-19, 1960.","quoted","journalofproceed55sanfrich",91,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed55sanfrich/page/n90",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.2],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed55sanfrich:146/1",1960,1960,"1960-03-07","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Assessor's office funding of $4,850.12 (≈ $55,209 in 2026 dollars) for a new Class D automobile passed on first reading.","quoted","journalofproceed55sanfrich",146,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed55sanfrich/page/n145",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed55sanfrich|g384",1960,1960,"1960-03-07","ordinance","budget","pending","$4,850.12 (≈ $55,209 in 2026 dollars) new car for Assessor's office up for final vote.","quoted","journalofproceed55sanfrich",146,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed55sanfrich/page/n145",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed55sanfrich|g408",1960,1960,"1960-03-14","ordinance","budget","passed","$4,850.12 (≈ $55,209 in 2026 dollars) new car for Assessor's office approved","quoted","journalofproceed55sanfrich",155,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed55sanfrich/page/n154",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-0.93],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed55sanfrich|g917",1960,1960,"1960-05-16","ordinance","admin","pending","Assessor's office set to get $2,500 (≈ $28,458 in 2026 dollars) for temporary pay; final vote pending.","quoted","journalofproceed55sanfrich",354,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed55sanfrich/page/n349",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed55sanfrich|g943",1960,1960,"1960-05-23","ordinance","admin","passed","Assessor's office gets $2,500 (≈ $28,458 in 2026 dollars) for temporary staff pay","quoted","journalofproceed55sanfrich",367,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed55sanfrich/page/n362",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-0.67],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed56sanfrich|g675",1961,1961,"1961-05-26","ordinance","budget","passed","Assessor's office gets $9,190 (≈ $103,561 in 2026 dollars) for temporary staff","quoted","journalofproceed56sanfrich",352,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed56sanfrich/page/n351",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.13],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed56sanfrich:352/3",1961,1961,"1961-06-05","ordinance",null,"passed","Assessor's office received $9,190 (≈ $103,561 in 2026 dollars) for temporary salaries under an emergency ordinance, finally passed.","quoted","journalofproceed56sanfrich",352,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed56sanfrich/page/n351",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.7],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed56sanfrich:675/1",1961,1961,"1961-11-13","hearing",null,null,"Objections by Meyer Brothers and owner [name withheld] to a higher assessment on Block 3600, Lot 68 were raised; the Assessor's office sought a continuance.","quoted","journalofproceed56sanfrich",675,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed56sanfrich/page/n674",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-5.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed58sanfrich|g447",1963,1963,"1963-05-06",null,"budget","passed","Assessor's office gets $19,274 (≈ $212,228 in 2026 dollars) for temporary pay","unverified","journalofproceed58sanfrich",242,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed58sanfrich/page/n241",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.63],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed59sanfrich|g430",1964,1964,"1964-04-27","resolution","admin","pending","$25,000 (≈ $271,726 in 2026 dollars) for temporary Assessor's Office pay sent to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed59sanfrich",328,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed59sanfrich/page/n325",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed59sanfrich:343/2",1964,1964,"1964-05-04","ordinance",null,"passed","$25,000 (≈ $271,726 in 2026 dollars) for temporary Assessor's Office salaries was approved as an emergency measure.","quoted","journalofproceed59sanfrich",343,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed59sanfrich/page/n340",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed59sanfrich|g456",1964,1964,"1964-05-04",null,"admin","pending","Pay for temporary workers in Assessor's office sent to committee.","unverified","journalofproceed59sanfrich",343,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed59sanfrich/page/n340",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed59sanfrich:446/2",1964,1964,"1964-06-01","ordinance","police","referred","Emergency appropriation of $11,930 (≈ $129,668 in 2026 dollars) for Assessor's Office temporary salaries and Sheriff's Department overtime was referred to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed59sanfrich",446,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed59sanfrich/page/n443",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed59sanfrich:602/3",1964,1964,"1964-07-20","ordinance",null,"referred","Appropriation of $4,500 (≈ $48,911 in 2026 dollars) for Assessor's Office equipment was referred to the Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed59sanfrich",602,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed59sanfrich/page/n599",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed59sanfrich|g852",1964,1964,"1964-07-23","resolution","budget","pending","$4,500 (≈ $48,911 in 2026 dollars) Assessor's Office equipment sent to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed59sanfrich",602,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed59sanfrich/page/n599",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed61sanfrich:440/1",1966,1966,"1966-05-23","ordinance",null,"passed","Assessor's office receives $10,596 (≈ $110,192 in 2026 dollars) for temporary salaries under an emergency ordinance, passed finally.","quoted","journalofproceed61sanfrich",440,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed61sanfrich/page/n439",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed61sanfrich|g788",1966,1966,"1966-05-23",null,"budget","passed","Emergency money for temporary Assessor's office staff approved","unverified","journalofproceed61sanfrich",440,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed61sanfrich/page/n439",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.63],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed61sanfrich:682/5",1966,1966,"1966-07-11","hearing",null,"passed","[name withheld] building assessment was reduced by $8,450 (≈ $87,875 in 2026 dollars) after the Assessor's Office admitted a miscalculation.","quoted","journalofproceed61sanfrich",682,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed61sanfrich/page/n681",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-5.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed61sanfrich:683/1",1966,1966,"1966-07-11","hearing",null,"passed","[name withheld] building assessment was reduced by $8,450 (≈ $87,875 in 2026 dollars) after the Assessor's Office admitted a miscalculation.","quoted","journalofproceed61sanfrich",683,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed61sanfrich/page/n682",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed61sanfrich:710/7",1966,1966,"1966-07-25","hearing",null,"continued","[name withheld] assessment appeal for Block 6530, Lot 7 is under consideration, with the Assessor's Office recommending a reduction.","quoted","journalofproceed61sanfrich",710,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed61sanfrich/page/n709",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-5.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123298913:23/1",1967,1967,"","agency","other",null,"Assessor's Office · other: Where to file personal property statements","unverified","C123298913",23,"https://archive.org/details/C123298913/page/n22","101 City Hall",null,null,"San Francisco government; a summary of the San Francisco City and County charter, the laws and ordinances, and the work of the various departments","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed62sanfrich:18/2",1967,1967,"1967-01-03","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Assessor's Office temporary salaries of $42,180 (≈ $425,513 in 2026 dollars) passed for second reading, with Ertola dissenting over the uniform assessment law.","quoted","journalofproceed62sanfrich",18,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed62sanfrich/page/n17",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed62sanfrich:28/2",1967,1967,"1967-01-09","ordinance",null,"passed","Appropriation of $42,180 (≈ $425,513 in 2026 dollars) for temporary salaries in the Assessor's office was finally passed.","quoted","journalofproceed62sanfrich",28,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed62sanfrich/page/n27",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed62sanfrich:171/2",1967,1967,"1967-02-27","ordinance",null,"referred","Emergency ordinance proposing $123,500 (≈ $1.2 million in 2026 dollars) for the Assessor's Office was referred to the Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed62sanfrich",171,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed62sanfrich/page/n170",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed62sanfrich|g293",1967,1967,"1967-02-27","resolution","budget","pending","$123,500 (≈ $1.2 million in 2026 dollars) extra for Assessor's office sent to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed62sanfrich",171,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed62sanfrich/page/n170",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed62sanfrich|g324",1967,1967,"1967-03-06",null,"budget","passed","Assessor's office gets $123,500 (≈ $1.2 million in 2026 dollars) for overtime and temporary staff","unverified","journalofproceed62sanfrich",188,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed62sanfrich/page/n187",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-0.63],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed62sanfrich:960/4",1967,1967,"1967-10-30","ordinance",null,"referred","An emergency $16,000 (≈ $161,408 in 2026 dollars) appropriation for Assessor's Office remodeling was referred to Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed62sanfrich",960,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed62sanfrich/page/n959",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed62sanfrich|360",1967,1967,"1967-10-30","ordinance","getting-around","passed first reading","$16,000 (≈ $161,408 in 2026 dollars) for remodeling the Assessor's Office sent to committee","unverified","journalofproceed62sanfrich",960,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed62sanfrich/page/n959",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.94],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed62sanfrich|g1686",1967,1967,"1967-10-30","ordinance","works","pending","Assessor's Office remodel money sent to committee for review.","quoted","journalofproceed62sanfrich",960,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed62sanfrich/page/n959",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed62sanfrich|g1714",1967,1967,"1967-11-06","ordinance","works","passed","Assessor's Office remodel money","quoted","journalofproceed62sanfrich",975,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed62sanfrich/page/n974",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-0.39],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed63sanfrich:369/1",1968,1968,"1968-04-22","ordinance",null,"referred","Emergency $8,550 (≈ $82,783 in 2026 dollars) appropriation for the Assessor's Office contractual services was referred to Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed63sanfrich",369,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed63sanfrich/page/n364",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed63sanfrich|g684",1968,1968,"1968-04-22","resolution","budget","pending","$8,550 (≈ $82,783 in 2026 dollars) extra for Assessor's Office sent to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed63sanfrich",369,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed63sanfrich/page/n364",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed63sanfrich|g416",1968,1968,"1968-06-04",null,"admin","passed","Assessor's office gets $28,000 (≈ $271,101 in 2026 dollars) for temporary staff pay","unverified","journalofproceed63sanfrich",247,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed63sanfrich/page/n242",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-0.75],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:102/1",1996,1971,"1971, 1983, 1990","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: File problem noted in prior ASD surveys and other management audits","unverified","C124914500",102,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n101",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed67sanfrich:1071/1",1972,1972,"1972-11-06","ordinance",null,"passed","The Assessor's office gets $1,700 (≈ $13,703 in 2026 dollars) for travel expense, shifted from its contractual services budget; passed final.","quoted","journalofproceed67sanfrich",1071,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed67sanfrich/page/n1070",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed67sanfrich|g3302",1972,1972,"1972-11-06",null,"budget","passed","Assessor's office moves $1,700 (≈ $13,703 in 2026 dollars) from contracts to travel","unverified","journalofproceed67sanfrich",1071,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed67sanfrich/page/n1070",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.13],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed69sanfrich|g3676",1974,1974,"1974-09-30","resolution","admin","passed","Assessor's office may refill a vacant auditor job","quoted","journalofproceed69sanfrich",1087,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed69sanfrich/page/n1082",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.05],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed69sanfrich|g3677",1974,1974,"1974-09-30",null,"admin","passed","Assessor's office may refill a vacant auditor job","unverified","journalofproceed69sanfrich",1087,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed69sanfrich/page/n1082",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjulydecproceed70sanfrich|g2131",1975,1975,"1975-12-08",null,"admin","pending","Assessor's office new appraiser-trainee job awaits final vote.","unverified","journalofjulydecproceed70sanfrich",628,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjulydecproceed70sanfrich/page/n628",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjulydecproceed70sanfrich|g2132",1975,1975,"1975-12-08",null,"admin","pending","Assessor's office new appraiser-trainee job awaits final vote.","unverified","journalofjulydecproceed70sanfrich",628,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjulydecproceed70sanfrich/page/n628",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjulydecproceed70sanfrich|g2202",1975,1975,"1975-12-15",null,"admin","unknown","New job title for Assessor's office; no vote shown.","unverified","journalofjulydecproceed70sanfrich",652,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjulydecproceed70sanfrich/page/n652",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich|g1574",1977,1977,"1977-05-23","resolution","admin","passed","Assessor's office may fill a vacant appraiser job now","quoted","journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich",499,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich/page/n498",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich|g2083",1977,1977,"1977-06-20","ordinance","budget","passed first reading","Assessor's office mailing machine purchase proposed.","quoted","journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich",631,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich/page/n630",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich|g864",1977,1977,"1977-09-06","resolution","admin","passed","Assessor's office signs state audit services contract","quoted","journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich",251,"https://archive.org/details/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich/page/n250",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-0.95],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich|g1897",1977,1977,"1977-11-28","ordinance","admin","pending","Assessor's office position reclassified, pay change; not final yet.","quoted","journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich",549,"https://archive.org/details/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich/page/n548",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich|g1898",1977,1977,"1977-11-28",null,"admin","pending","Assessor's office position reclassified, pay change; not final yet.","unverified","journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich",549,"https://archive.org/details/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich/page/n548",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich|g1986",1977,1977,"1977-12-05","ordinance","admin","passed","Assessor's office reclassifies one job; $5,878 (≈ $32,682 in 2026 dollars) moved","quoted","journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich",578,"https://archive.org/details/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich/page/n577",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich|g1987",1977,1977,"1977-12-05",null,"admin","passed","Assessor's office reclassifies one job; $5,878 (≈ $32,682 in 2026 dollars) moved.","unverified","journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich",578,"https://archive.org/details/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich/page/n577",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich|g1988",1977,1977,"1977-12-05",null,"admin","passed","Assessor's office job reclassified and pay list updated","unverified","journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich",578,"https://archive.org/details/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich/page/n577",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.75],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906117:102/3",1978,1978,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's office · other: Cooperated; property sale dates recorded from [name withheld] cards","unverified","C124906117",102,"https://archive.org/details/C124906117/page/n101",null,null,null,"Study of property acquisition and occupancy : BART's effect on speculation, working paper","n","m",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:135/3",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Assessor's Office · other: residential property turns over on an average of every seven years","unverified","C124924016",135,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n134",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed74sanfrich|g1547",1979,1979,"1979-04-16","ordinance","admin","pending","Assessor's office gets $65,000 (≈ $301,668 in 2026 dollars) to keep staffing; not final.","quoted","journaljanjuneofproceed74sanfrich",471,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed74sanfrich/page/n470",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed74sanfrich|g1548",1979,1979,"1979-04-16",null,"admin","pending","Assessor's office gets $65,000 (≈ $301,668 in 2026 dollars) to keep staffing; not final.","unverified","journaljanjuneofproceed74sanfrich",471,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed74sanfrich/page/n470",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed74sanfrich|g1601",1979,1979,"1979-04-23","ordinance","admin","passed","Money set aside to keep Assessor's office staffing level","quoted","journaljanjuneofproceed74sanfrich",487,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed74sanfrich/page/n486",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-0.87],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed74sanfrich|g1602",1979,1979,"1979-04-23",null,"admin","passed","Money set aside to keep Assessor's office staffing level.","unverified","journaljanjuneofproceed74sanfrich",487,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed74sanfrich/page/n486",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed77sanfrich:382/2",1982,1982,"1982-03-29","ordinance",null,"passed","Assessor's office received $2,889 (≈ $10,087 in 2026 dollars) for equipment, with the same amount taken from its permanent salaries, finally passed.","quoted","journalofjanjuneproceed77sanfrich",382,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed77sanfrich/page/n381",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.3],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed77sanfrich:417/6",1982,1982,"1982-04-05","resolution",null,"passed","The Board adopted a resolution accepting used office furniture valued at $6,000 (≈ $20,950 in 2026 dollars) from Levi Strauss & Co. for the Assessor's Office.","quoted","journalofjanjuneproceed77sanfrich",417,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed77sanfrich/page/n416",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich:579/2",1983,1983,null,"ordinance",null,"passed","Assessor's office gets $1,940 (≈ $6,563 in 2026 dollars) moved to reclassify four positions, passed as Ordinance 554-83.","quoted","journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich",579,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich/page/n576",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,5.3],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceedjanjune78sanfrich:97/1",1983,1983,"1983-01-24","ordinance",null,"passed","Ordinance giving the Assessor's office $13,620 (≈ $46,076 in 2026 dollars) for current expenses and furniture was finally passed.","quoted","journalofproceedjanjune78sanfrich",97,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceedjanjune78sanfrich/page/n94",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich:36/4",1983,1983,"1983-07-11","resolution",null,"passed","Resolution approves immediately filling two vacant Assessor's Office positions, a chief appraiser and a civil engineering assistant.","quoted","journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich",36,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich/page/n35",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.2],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich:146/5",1983,1983,"1983-08-08","resolution",null,"passed","Board adopted a resolution adjusting the Assessor's Office inventory to reflect lost property.","quoted","journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich",146,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich/page/n143",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich:264/4",1983,1983,"1983-09-06","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Proposed $1,764 (≈ $5,967 in 2026 dollars) appropriation for Assessor's office equipment; passed for second reading.","quoted","journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich",264,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich/page/n261",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.2],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich:552/1",1983,1983,"1983-11-21","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Assessor's Office salary ordinance amended for four reclassified positions, passed for second reading; companion to File 101-83-41.","quoted","journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich",552,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich/page/n549",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,5.3],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich:580/1",1983,1983,"1983-11-28","ordinance",null,"passed","Assessor's Office salary ordinance reclassifying four positions was finally passed, as a companion to an earlier appropriation.","quoted","journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich",580,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich/page/n577",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,5.3],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich:123/2",1984,1984,"1984-01-30","resolution",null,"passed","The Board adopted a resolution adjusting the Assessor's Office inventory to reflect lost property; Supervisor Molinari requested an inquiry letter on shortages.","quoted","journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich",123,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich/page/n122",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.3],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich:413/4",1984,1984,"1984-04-09","ordinance",null,"passed","Assessor's office gets $1,148 (≈ $3,723 in 2026 dollars) for equipment, finally passed.","quoted","journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich",413,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich/page/n410",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.2],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljulydecofproceed79sanfrich:169/3",1984,1984,"1984-08-13","other",null,"passed","Board approved immediate filling of a vacated Civil Engineering Assistant II post in the Assessor's Office.","quoted","journaljulydecofproceed79sanfrich",169,"https://archive.org/details/journaljulydecofproceed79sanfrich/page/n168",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.25],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885198:31/5",1984,1984,"December 1981","finding","plan",null,"Assessor's Office administrative records · finding: only 46.9% of condo purchasers have claimed homeownership exemption","unverified","C124885198",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124885198/page/n30",null,null,null,"Residence : the residence element of the comprehensive plan of the city and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich:631/2",1985,1985,"1985-11-25","resolution",null,"passed","Approves immediate filling of two vacated Personal Property Auditor positions in the Assessor's Office.","quoted","journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich",631,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich/page/n630",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.2],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofseptdecproceed83sanfrich:176/4",1988,1988,"1988-10-17","resolution",null,null,"A resolution to fill one Senior Real Property Appraiser position immediately in the Assessor's Office was proposed.","quoted","journalofseptdecproceed83sanfrich",176,"https://archive.org/details/journalofseptdecproceed83sanfrich/page/n176",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayseptofproceed84sanfrich:621/4",1989,1989,null,"ordinance",null,"referred","A proposed $316,000 (≈ $858,654 in 2026 dollars) appropriation for Assessor's Office data processing was referred to the Finance Committee.","quoted","journalmayseptofproceed84sanfrich",621,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayseptofproceed84sanfrich/page/n620",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902971:139/1",1989,1989,"","finding","audit",null,"Assessor's Office property tax revenue loss from horizontal extensions · cost usd: $90,500 to $126,700 per year","unverified","C124902971",139,"https://archive.org/details/C124902971/page/n138",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the city's permit processing system","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902971:139/2",1989,1989,"","finding","audit",null,"Horizontal extensions to residences not reviewed by Assessor's Office · finding: as many as 32 properties per year","unverified","C124902971",139,"https://archive.org/details/C124902971/page/n138",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the city's permit processing system","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902971:140/1",1989,1989,"","finding","audit",null,"Assessor's Office escaped assessments of new construction · other: approximately a dozen annually","unverified","C124902971",140,"https://archive.org/details/C124902971/page/n139",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the city's permit processing system","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902971:140/3",1989,1989,"","finding","audit",null,"Assessor's Office horizontal extension permit records · other: no record of eight of 26 sampled permit applications","unverified","C124902971",140,"https://archive.org/details/C124902971/page/n139",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the city's permit processing system","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902971:141/1",1989,1989,"","finding","audit",null,"Assessor's Office missed horizontal additions · finding: revenue loss conservatively estimated at $18,144 annually","unverified","C124902971",141,"https://archive.org/details/C124902971/page/n140",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the city's permit processing system","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902971:141/10002",1989,1989,"","finding","audit",null,"Assessor's Office · finding: does not receive a printout of the permits that have been issued","unverified","C124902971",141,"https://archive.org/details/C124902971/page/n140",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the city's permit processing system","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902971:141/2",1989,1989,"","finding","audit",null,"Assessor's Office missed horizontal additions · finding: total revenue loss could range from $90,500 to $126,700 per year","unverified","C124902971",141,"https://archive.org/details/C124902971/page/n140",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the city's permit processing system","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902971:141/3",1989,1989,"","finding","audit",null,"BBI permit printout for Assessor's Office · finding: BBI offered to produce printout of all permits issued; no response received","unverified","C124902971",141,"https://archive.org/details/C124902971/page/n140",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the city's permit processing system","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902971:143/1",1989,1989,"","finding","audit",null,"Permit processing system: Assessor's Office access to permit applications · finding: the Assessor does not receive access to all of the permit applications","unverified","C124902971",143,"https://archive.org/details/C124902971/page/n142",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the city's permit processing system","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902971:143/2",1989,1989,"","recommendation","audit",null,"BBI and Assessor's Office permit application transfer procedure · recommendation: Require all applications to be typed or printed","unverified","C124902971",143,"https://archive.org/details/C124902971/page/n142",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the city's permit processing system","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902971:143/3",1989,1989,"","recommendation","audit",null,"BBI and Assessor's Office permit application transfer procedure · recommendation: Assessor automatically review all approved and completed applications reviewed by City Planning and subject to the San Francisco Unified School District Fee","unverified","C124902971",143,"https://archive.org/details/C124902971/page/n142",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the city's permit processing system","n","m",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902971:143/4",1989,1989,"","recommendation","audit",null,"BBI and Assessor's Office permit application transfer procedure · recommendation: Develop a simple control procedure for ensuring that permit applications sent out for microfilming return in complete form","unverified","C124902971",143,"https://archive.org/details/C124902971/page/n142",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the city's permit processing system","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902971:143/5",1989,1989,"","finding","audit",null,"Assessor's Office lost property tax revenues from permit information gaps · cost usd: $90,500 to $126,700 per year","unverified","C124902971",143,"https://archive.org/details/C124902971/page/n142",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the city's permit processing system","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayseptofproceed84sanfrich:15/1",1989,1989,"1989-05-01","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Assessor's Office staffing change adds two positions and deletes two, passed on first reading.","quoted","journalmayseptofproceed84sanfrich",15,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayseptofproceed84sanfrich/page/n14",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayseptofproceed84sanfrich:37/3",1989,1989,"1989-05-08","ordinance",null,"passed","Ordinance finally passed moving $14,612 (≈ $39,705 in 2026 dollars) in salary funds in the Assessor's Office, creating two positions and deleting two.","quoted","journalmayseptofproceed84sanfrich",37,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayseptofproceed84sanfrich/page/n36",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.2],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayseptofproceed84sanfrich:37/4",1989,1989,"1989-05-08","ordinance",null,"passed","Ordinance finally passed amending the salary ordinance to add and delete two positions in the Assessor's Office.","quoted","journalmayseptofproceed84sanfrich",37,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayseptofproceed84sanfrich/page/n36",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.15],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaloctdecofproceed84sanfrich:33/4",1989,1989,"1989-10-10","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","The Board of Supervisors passed on second reading a $316,000 (≈ $858,654 in 2026 dollars) appropriation for the Assessor's Office data processing, sponsored by Supervisor Walker.","quoted","journaloctdecofproceed84sanfrich",33,"https://archive.org/details/journaloctdecofproceed84sanfrich/page/n32",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaloctdecofproceed84sanfrich:57/2",1989,1989,"1989-10-16","ordinance",null,"passed","Ordinance appropriating $316,000 (≈ $858,654 in 2026 dollars) for Assessor's Office data processing in fiscal 1989-90 was finally passed.","quoted","journaloctdecofproceed84sanfrich",57,"https://archive.org/details/journaloctdecofproceed84sanfrich/page/n56",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:81/2",1996,1989,"1989-1994","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: reviewed appraisal records of properties owned by 18 legal entities with a change in control","unverified","C124914500",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n80",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:81/3",1996,1989,"1989-1994","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: appraisal records for only three of the entities clearly indicate valuation changes were made or considered","unverified","C124914500",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n80",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:81/4",1996,1989,"1989-1994","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: properties of six other entities were reappraised after the changes in control, reasons not noted","unverified","C124914500",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n80",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902971:13/2",1989,1989,"October 26, 1989","finding","audit",null,"Assessor's Office · finding: Horizontal extensions on as many as 32 properties per year are not reviewed and supplementally assessed","unverified","C124902971",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124902971/page/n12",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the city's permit processing system","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902971:13/3",1989,1989,"October 26, 1989","finding","audit",null,"Assessor's Office · finding: Loss of property tax revenues estimated between $90,500 and $126,700 per year","unverified","C124902971",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124902971/page/n12",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the city's permit processing system","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902971:285/1",1989,1989,"October 3, 1989","agency","audit",null,"Assessor's Office - Coordination of Permit Activity (Section 2.4 of draft permit processing audit) · recommendation: Assessor's Office views the audit's comments as accurate and its recommendations as sound and positive","unverified","C124902971",285,"https://archive.org/details/C124902971/page/n284",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the city's permit processing system","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:117/1",1996,1990,"1990","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: lack of reliability in the database generating the List of Accounts for Primary Audit","unverified","C124914500",117,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n116",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:118/1",1996,1990,"1990","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Accumulate assessed value statistics according to owner when determining accounts requiring a mandatory audit","unverified","C124914500",118,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n117",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:19/5",1996,1990,"1990","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office, business property mandatory audit program · finding: prior ASD survey (1990) noted a backlog of mandatory audits","unverified","C124914500",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n18",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903568:81/2",1991,1991,"","agency","other",null,"Assessor's office · other: Assessor's office, Room 101, City Hall","unverified","C124903568",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124903568/page/n80","101 City Hall",null,null,"A guide to City Hall, city & county of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:114/3",1996,1991,"1991-92","agency","study or report",null,"Personal property division, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · other: 31 auditor-appraisers in 1991-92 budget year","unverified","C124914500",114,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n113",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich:185/2",1992,1992,"1992-02-10","other",null,"referred","Resolution to fill the vacated Chief Property Appraiser post in the Assessor's Office was sent to the Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich",185,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich/page/n185",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:48/6",1996,1992,"1992-93","action","study or report",null,"Independent contract appraisers, Assessor's Office · other: 35 appraisals assigned","unverified","C124914500",48,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n47",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich:364/3",1993,1993,"1993-03-29","resolution",null,"referred","Resolution urging funding for Assessor's Office computers and staff to find unreported property transfers was referred to the Board.","quoted","journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich",364,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich/page/n363",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:99/2",1996,1993,"1993-1994","action","study or report",null,"contract appraiser group, San Francisco Assessor's Office · other: completed about 350 appraisals, mostly large complex properties under appeal","unverified","C124914500",99,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n98",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744877:311/4",1994,1993,"1993-94","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · finding: approximately 2,500 supplemental assessments delayed, adversely affecting City revenues","unverified","C101744877",311,"https://archive.org/details/C101744877/page/n310",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744877:313/4",1994,1993,"1993-94","agency","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · cost usd: $6,060,437 total, 97 FTE, net general fund","unverified","C101744877",313,"https://archive.org/details/C101744877/page/n312",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101745011:179/2",1994,1993,"1993-94","agency","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office Real Property program · cost usd: $2,600,806","unverified","C101745011",179,"https://archive.org/details/C101745011/page/n178",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101745011:179/3",1994,1993,"1993-94","agency","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · cost usd: $6,060,437 total net General Fund cost, 97 FTE","unverified","C101745011",179,"https://archive.org/details/C101745011/page/n178",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:35/1",1996,1993,"1993-94","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · cost usd: $6.1 million total budget","unverified","C124914500",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n34",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:35/10001",1996,1993,"1993-94","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Assessor's Office · finding: adequately funded and adequately staffed","unverified","C124914500",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n34",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:35/10002",1996,1993,"1993-94","measure","study or report",null,"San Francisco Assessor's Office · cost usd: $6.1 million budget, 97 staff","unverified","C124914500",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n34",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:35/2",1996,1993,"1993-94","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · other: 97 staff","unverified","C124914500",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n34",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:35/3",1996,1993,"1993-94","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: adequately funded and adequately staffed",null,"C124914500",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n34",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:48/5",1996,1993,"1993-94","action","study or report",null,"Contract appraisals and support staff, Assessor's Office · cost usd: $500,000 recommended in special funding","unverified","C124914500",48,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n47",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:48/7",1996,1993,"1993-94","action","study or report",null,"Independent contract appraisers, Assessor's Office · other: 310 appraisals assigned","unverified","C124914500",48,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n47",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:51/2",1996,1993,"1993-94","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · other: 6,500 appeals","unverified","C124914500",51,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n50",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:114/5",1996,1993,"1993-94 and 1994-95","finding","study or report",null,"Personal property division, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: average of 25 mandatory audits per auditor-appraiser per year, versus about 32 needed","unverified","C124914500",114,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n113",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744877:311/1",1994,1994,"","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · other: over 169,000 parcels of real property reviewed annually","unverified","C101744877",311,"https://archive.org/details/C101744877/page/n310",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744877:311/2",1994,1994,"","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · other: 55,000 personal property records reviewed annually","unverified","C101744877",311,"https://archive.org/details/C101744877/page/n310",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744877:313/1",1994,1994,"","agency","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · other: Responsible for establishing the value of real and personal property within San Francisco","unverified","C101744877",313,"https://archive.org/details/C101744877/page/n312",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744877:313/2",1994,1994,"","agency","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · other: Provides the necessary data to the Tax Collector's Office so property taxes may be billed and collected","unverified","C101744877",313,"https://archive.org/details/C101744877/page/n312",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744877:313/3",1994,1994,"","agency","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · other: Responsible for auditing businesses to verify the reported value of personal property","unverified","C101744877",313,"https://archive.org/details/C101744877/page/n312",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101745011:177/1",1994,1994,"","agency","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · other: establishes value of real and personal property citywide","unverified","C101745011",177,"https://archive.org/details/C101745011/page/n176",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101745011:177/2",1994,1994,"","agency","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · other: reviews over 169,000 parcels of real property annually","unverified","C101745011",177,"https://archive.org/details/C101745011/page/n176",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101745011:177/3",1994,1994,"","agency","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · other: reviews 55,000 personal property records annually","unverified","C101745011",177,"https://archive.org/details/C101745011/page/n176",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101745011:177/5",1994,1994,"","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · other: backlog delays enrollment of approximately 2,500 supplemental assessments","unverified","C101745011",177,"https://archive.org/details/C101745011/page/n176",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101745011:177/7",1994,1994,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · recommendation: recommends some of the positions the Department requested","unverified","C101745011",177,"https://archive.org/details/C101745011/page/n176",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101745011:179/1",1994,1994,"","agency","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · other: establishing the value of real and personal property within San Francisco","unverified","C101745011",179,"https://archive.org/details/C101745011/page/n178",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101745011:181/2",1994,1994,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · recommendation: include the Real Property Appraisal, Supervising Clerk and Assessment Clerk positions in the budget","unverified","C101745011",181,"https://archive.org/details/C101745011/page/n180",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101745011:181/3",1994,1994,"","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · finding: four Personnel Property Appraisers and two Senior Personnel Property Appraisers would generate only an additional $300,000 in revenue","unverified","C101745011",181,"https://archive.org/details/C101745011/page/n180",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101745011:181/4",1994,1994,"","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office Personnel Property positions · cost usd: $342,737 cost of the Personnel Property positions","unverified","C101745011",181,"https://archive.org/details/C101745011/page/n180",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101745011:181/5",1994,1994,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · recommendation: do not reinstate the Personnel Property positions in the Assessor's budget","unverified","C101745011",181,"https://archive.org/details/C101745011/page/n180",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:61/1",1996,1994,"1994","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco Assessor's Office · finding: approximately 3,000 roll corrections, excluding assessment appeals, made during 1994","unverified","C124914500",61,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n60",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:99/1",1996,1994,"1994","event","study or report",null,"San Francisco Assessor's Office contract appraiser program · other: decision to make large-scale use of independent contract appraisers for the appeals workload","unverified","C124914500",99,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n98",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanaprofproceed89sanfrich|g777",1994,1994,"1994-02-14","resolution","budget","pending","Urges appeal-reform savings go to Assessor's Office; in committee.","quoted","journaljanaprofproceed89sanfrich",151,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanaprofproceed89sanfrich/page/n150",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:115/1",1996,1994,"1994-1995 audit year","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office personal property division audit staff · finding: waivers obtained from approximately 38 percent of mandatory audits not completed","unverified","C124914500",115,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n114",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744877:311/5",1994,1994,"1994-95","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · recommendation: Increase staffing in certain areas to generate increased revenues; recommend some positions requested by the Department","unverified","C101744877",311,"https://archive.org/details/C101744877/page/n310",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744877:311/6",1994,1994,"1994-95","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · recommendation: Revenues not to be increased in fiscal year 1994-95 by more than the cost of recommended positions","unverified","C101744877",311,"https://archive.org/details/C101744877/page/n310",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744877:314/9",1994,1994,"1994-95","measure","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office total · cost usd: $6,452,008 with 110 FTE","unverified","C101744877",314,"https://archive.org/details/C101744877/page/n313",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101745011:181/1",1994,1994,"1994-95","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · finding: estimated $3,000,000 in increased revenues from five Real Property Appraisers, Supervising Clerk III and Assessment Clerk","unverified","C101745011",181,"https://archive.org/details/C101745011/page/n180",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:114/4",1996,1994,"1994-95","agency","study or report",null,"Personal property division, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · other: 21 auditor-appraiser positions in 1994-95, a loss of 10 positions","unverified","C124914500",114,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n113",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:48/8",1996,1994,"1994-95","action","study or report",null,"Independent contract appraisers, Assessor's Office · other: 25 appraisals assigned by July 1995","unverified","C124914500",48,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n47",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:51/3",1996,1994,"1994-95","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · other: 3,300 appeals","unverified","C124914500",51,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n50",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:51/4",1996,1994,"1994-95","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · other: between 100 and 200 appeals for each of its 30+ appraisers","unverified","C124914500",51,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n50",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:120/1",1996,1994,"1994-95 audit year","finding","study or report",null,"Personal property division, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: only 26 nonmandatory audits completed","unverified","C124914500",120,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n119",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:53/2",1996,1994,"1994-95 roll","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office property tax exemption program · assessed value usd: $2.6 billion in exemptions, 4.75 percent of the total roll","unverified","C124914500",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n52",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101745011:177/8",1994,1994,"April 29, 1994","action","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office budget request · other: Phase C Department Request 1994-95 budget as of April 29, 1994","unverified","C101745011",177,"https://archive.org/details/C101745011/page/n176",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744877:311/3",1994,1994,"fiscal year 1993-94","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · other: over 6,500 new assessment appeals filed","unverified","C101744877",311,"https://archive.org/details/C101744877/page/n310",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101745011:177/4",1994,1994,"fiscal year 1993-94","event","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · other: over 6,500 new assessment appeals filed","unverified","C101745011",177,"https://archive.org/details/C101745011/page/n176",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101745011:177/6",1994,1994,"fiscal year 1994-95","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · recommendation: no revenue increase in 1994-95 beyond cost of recommended positions","unverified","C101745011",177,"https://archive.org/details/C101745011/page/n176",null,null,null,"Report for the Budget Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : zero-based budget analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914005:51/5",1995,1995,"","finding","audit",null,"Assessor's Office · finding: substantial delays in posting reassessments in property values to the Tax Rolls","unverified","C124914005",51,"https://archive.org/details/C124914005/page/n50",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the Tax Collector's Office","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914005:64/1",1995,1995,"","finding","audit",null,"Assessor's Office · finding: substantial delays in posting reassessments in property values to the Tax Rolls","unverified","C124914005",64,"https://archive.org/details/C124914005/page/n63",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the Tax Collector's Office","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914005:65/2",1995,1995,"","recommendation","audit",null,"Assessor's Office unsecured personal property Social Security numbers · recommendation: Work with the Assessor and State representatives to change the State Revenue and Taxation Code so the Tax Collector can receive UPP owners' [name withheld] numbers","unverified","C124914005",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124914005/page/n64",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the Tax Collector's Office","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914005:65/3",1995,1995,"","recommendation","audit",null,"Assessor's Office reassessment data automation · recommendation: Continue to support and encourage efforts to automate the Assessor's Office procedures for entering reassessment data to the [name withheld]","unverified","C124914005",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124914005/page/n64",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the Tax Collector's Office","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915586:56/2",1995,1995,"","agency","other",null,"County Clerk-Recorder and Assessor's Office · other: County Clerk-Recorder office merged with Assessor's Office; incumbent keeps civil service status","unverified","C124915586",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124915586/page/n55",null,null,null,"The charter of the City and County of San Francisco : [proposal of the Select Committee on Charter Reform of the Board of Supervisors, with accompanying material]","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914005:9/5",1995,1995,"1995","finding","audit",null,"Assessor's Office · finding: Substantial delays in posting reassessments in property values to the Tax Rolls","unverified","C124914005",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124914005/page/n8",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the Tax Collector's Office","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:34/3",1996,1995,"1995","event","study or report",null,"Assessor's office personal computers · other: 20 new PCs purchased, not installed as of September 1995","unverified","C124914500",34,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n33",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:133/3",1996,1995,"1995-96","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office secured assessment roll · other: 1,137 business property assessments on the secured roll","unverified","C124914500",133,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n132",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:48/9",1996,1995,"1995-96","action","study or report",null,"Contract appraisals, Assessor's Office · cost usd: $150,000 additional funding received","unverified","C124914500",48,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n47",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:53/5",1996,1995,"1995-96 filing period","finding","study or report",null,"Welfare exemption claims, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: Claims had one or more problems related to inconsistent processing in the county office","unverified","C124914500",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n52",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:138/1",1996,1995,"1995-96 tax roll","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office, marine assessment section · other: 1,814 vessels","unverified","C124914500",138,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n137",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:138/2",1996,1995,"1995-96 tax roll","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office, marine assessment section · assessed value usd: $30,804,622 full cash value","unverified","C124914500",138,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n137",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:49/3",1996,1995,"February 28, 1995","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office, assessment appeals 1993-94 · other: 5,120 appeals of assessments totaling $3,307,132,371 presented by assessor's staff","unverified","C124914500",49,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n48",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:102/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: Files stored in standard three-drawer cabinets; appraisers have free access; outcard system mostly ignored","unverified","C124914500",102,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n101",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:102/3",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office appraisal files · recommendation: Open-shelf file system within a file room or well-defined area with controlled access","unverified","C124914500",102,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n101",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:102/4",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office file system · finding: File problem is of sufficient magnitude that it materially degrades the valuation function","unverified","C124914500",102,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n101",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:103/1",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: problem noted in prior ASD surveys of the assessor's office","unverified","C124914500",103,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n102",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:103/2",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: develop a standard form for analyzing sales, retained centrally","unverified","C124914500",103,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n102",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:115/2",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Obtain a signed waiver of the statute of limitations when a mandatory audit will not be completed timely","unverified","C124914500",115,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n114",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:115/3",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office personal property division · finding: failure to obtain signed waivers allowed some taxable property to permanently escape assessment","unverified","C124914500",115,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n114",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:115/4",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Establish a priority for the mandatory audit program","unverified","C124914500",115,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n114",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:117/3",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office personal property division · recommendation: audit staff should continue efforts to ensure data reliability of the List of Accounts for Primary Audits","unverified","C124914500",117,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n116",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:120/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"Personal property division, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: no formal nonmandatory audit program","unverified","C124914500",120,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n119",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:120/3",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Personal property division, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Develop a formal nonmandatory audit program","unverified","C124914500",120,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n119",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:121/1",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office, business property statement processing · finding: Present computers and antiquated system are insufficient for the growing number of business accounts","unverified","C124914500",121,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n120",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:121/2",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office, business property statement processing · recommendation: Improve processing of business property statements by screening for completeness, adding Section 463 penalty for improperly signed statements, and using clerical personnel","unverified","C124914500",121,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n120",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:127/4",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Develop and implement written standardized procedures for discovery and assessment of landlord-owned apartment personal property","unverified","C124914500",127,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n126",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:129/3",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: underground tanks, pumps, monitoring systems, and fuel dispensers assessed as land improvements","unverified","C124914500",129,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n128",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:130/1",1996,1996,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office leased equipment program · other: one auditor-appraiser and one clerical support staff assigned to assessment of leased equipment","unverified","C124914500",130,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n129",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:130/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"Leased equipment assessment program, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: Several problems reflecting inadequate procedures for discovery, mailing, processing, and review of leased equipment assessments","unverified","C124914500",130,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n129",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:132/1",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: exemption staff routinely exempt all leased equipment reported by welfare exemption claimants without reference to the contractual relationship","unverified","C124914500",132,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n131",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:132/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: leased equipment reported by the lessor is routinely assessed to the lessor","unverified","C124914500",132,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n131",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:132/3",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: county does not assess leased property once the lease is terminated unless the lessee reports it","unverified","C124914500",132,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n131",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:132/4",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: exemption staff copy and forward listing of unowned leased property to the leased equipment coordinator of the personal property division","unverified","C124914500",132,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n131",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:132/5",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: implement procedures to more closely track the disposition of leased equipment when the lease has expired","unverified","C124914500",132,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n131",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:135/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Restructure auditor-appraiser workload so all property statements are processed before the assessment roll is completed as of July 1","unverified","C124914500",135,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n134",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:135/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: Assessments were levied against a \"doing business as\" name rather than the actual business owner's name","unverified","C124914500",135,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n134",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:136/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: has not responded to ASD's request for the annual checklists of Board-prescribed forms","unverified","C124914500",136,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n135",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:136/3",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: has a perennial problem with timely submission of Board-prescribed forms to ASD for approval","unverified","C124914500",136,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n135",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:139/2",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's office · recommendation: Obtain computer access to the DMV boat information system","unverified","C124914500",139,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n138",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:144/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office Standard and Quality Control Unit · recommendation: Assigned responsibility for research and resolution of questionable transfer deeds","unverified","C124914500",144,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n143",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:15/10001",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's office · finding: Many valuable properties were under assessed or not assessed at all","unverified","C124914500",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n14",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:15/10005",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's office technology · other: Technology support consisted mainly of 1960's era mainframe computers","unverified","C124914500",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n14",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:16/10",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Administrative and operations manuals, San Francisco County Assessor's office · recommendation: Complete manuals must be written or updated, implemented, and monitored","unverified","C124914500",16,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n15",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:16/7",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's office personal computers · other: Approximately 33 PCs operational (13 on LAN, 20 stand alone)","unverified","C124914500",16,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n15",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:16/8",1996,1996,"","action","study or report",null,"Appraiser trainees, San Francisco County Assessor's office · other: Six appraiser trainees recently hired for about six-month hands-on training program","unverified","C124914500",16,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n15",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:165/2",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office Policy and [name withheld] · recommendation: Develop a policy and procedures manual for general administrative matters and update operations manuals","unverified","C124914500",165,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n164",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:167/2",1996,1996,"","action","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office personal computer and LAN training · other: over 355 hours of training for more than 20 real property appraisers and seven clerical staff","unverified","C124914500",167,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n166",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:168/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office hiring review (Recommendation 6) · recommendation: No need to initiate a review of Civil Service Rules and Regulations","unverified","C124914500",168,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n167",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:168/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office staff training · finding: Training is provided to employees; the report's statement that there is no training is untrue","unverified","C124914500",168,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n167",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:17/2",1996,1996,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Standards and quality control unit should be reorganized, stripped of non-standards functions, and charged with monitoring operations manuals","unverified","C124914500",17,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n16",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:170/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office clerical and assessment clerk staff · recommendation: Cross-train and rotate clerical and assessment clerk staff in the real property and personal property divisions","unverified","C124914500",170,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n169",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:170/2",1996,1996,"","action","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office clerical staff rotation · other: Rotation of clerical staff started and planned between Real Property and Personal Property Divisions","unverified","C124914500",170,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n169",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:170/3",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office assessment appeals administration · recommendation: Upgrade administration of assessment appeals: control over appraisal records, appeal training, and computer software","unverified","C124914500",170,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n169",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:170/4",1996,1996,"","action","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office contract appraisers · other: Contract appraisers required to formally sign out appeal records and take only a few at a time","unverified","C124914500",170,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n169",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:170/6",1996,1996,"","event","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office real property principal appraisers · event: Four real property principal appraisers attended Managing Problem Performance course","unverified","C124914500",170,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n169",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:171/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office welfare exemption program · other: Only two welfare exemption clerks processing 5,000 applications","unverified","C124914500",171,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n170",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:171/3",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office welfare exemption program · recommendation: Exemption Supervisor directed to process applications within ten working days of receipt","unverified","C124914500",171,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n170",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:171/4",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office welfare exemption program · recommendation: Format letter to be presented to the Board for ratification","unverified","C124914500",171,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n170",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:172/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office property tax exemption program · recommendation: Assessor concurs with Recommendation 12 on improvements to the property tax exemption program","unverified","C124914500",172,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n171",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:177/1",1996,1996,"","action","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · other: Transactions Unit established to control and process change of ownership and building permits","unverified","C124914500",177,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n176",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:178/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office change in control properties · recommendation: Establish procedures, controls, and areas of responsibility to ensure timely reappraisal of properties with changes in control","unverified","C124914500",178,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n177",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:188/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office, escape assessment procedures · recommendation: Revise escape assessment procedures, ensure all business property statements are processed before the assessment roll is completed","unverified","C124914500",188,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n187",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:188/3",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office, boat appraisal procedures · recommendation: Upgrade the boat appraisal procedures, including updating the marine division procedure manual","unverified","C124914500",188,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n187",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:188/4",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office, boat appraisal procedures · other: Annual Vessel Property Statement for boats costing $100,000 or more","unverified","C124914500",188,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n187",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:189/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office boat appraisal procedures · recommendation: Revise vessel procedures: require current US Coast Guard Certificate of Inspection; apply 80 percent reduction for late-filed exemption claims","unverified","C124914500",189,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n188",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:189/2",1996,1996,"","action","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office vessel exemption claims · adopted: 80 percent assessment reduction for late-filed exemption claims will be adhered to","unverified","C124914500",189,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n188",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:20/2",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office Policy and [name withheld] · recommendation: Develop a Policy and [name withheld] for general administrative matters and update operations manuals","unverified","C124914500",20,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n19",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:20/4",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office computer system · recommendation: Acquire a modern mainframe computer system, implement a Local Area Network, and fill the vacant computer specialist position","unverified","C124914500",20,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n19",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:22/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Establish an appraisal activity system to help identify and prioritize the real property workload","unverified","C124914500",22,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n21",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:22/2",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Create and maintain an appraisal data bank","unverified","C124914500",22,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n21",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:22/3",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Eliminate the current backlog of assessable new construction","unverified","C124914500",22,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n21",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:22/4",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Standardize the use of the cost approach for valuation of new construction","unverified","C124914500",22,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n21",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:28/1",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: Division chiefs do not currently have plans laying out division-specific issues and strategies","unverified","C124914500",28,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n27",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:28/10001",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's office strategic plan · recommendation: Identify opportunities and problems that help or hinder the office's mission and goals, and include them in the strategic plan","unverified","C124914500",28,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n27",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:28/2",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office strategic plan · recommendation: Identify opportunities and problems that help or hinder the office's mission and goals, and include them in the strategic plan",null,"C124914500",28,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n27",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:29/2",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office Policy and [name withheld] · recommendation: Develop an Assessor's Office Policy and [name withheld] covering general administrative matters and update operations manuals","unverified","C124914500",29,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n28",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:32/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Standards and Quality Control Unit · recommendation: Unit must be headed by a high level position and report only to the assessor and her executive staff","unverified","C124914500",32,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n31",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:32/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: Woefully antiquated in its adaptations of computers to basic assessment roll functions","unverified","C124914500",32,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n31",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:32/3",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's computer capabilities · recommendation: Acquire a modern mainframe computer system, implement a Local Area Network, and fill the vacant computer specialist position","unverified","C124914500",32,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n31",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:34/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's office real property information system · recommendation: replace the outmoded real property information system with a modern system","unverified","C124914500",34,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n33",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:34/4",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's office Local Area Network · recommendation: complete the LAN installation as soon as possible","unverified","C124914500",34,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n33",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:34/5",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's office MIS Specialist II position · recommendation: fill the computer specialist position at once and assign support staff as needed","unverified","C124914500",34,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n33",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:36/3",1996,1996,"","measure","study or report",null,"San Francisco Assessor's Office · other: 7 administrative positions of 90 total staff","unverified","C124914500",36,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n35",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:36/4",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Assessor's Office · finding: appears to have more administrative staff than the comparable counties","unverified","C124914500",36,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n35",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:39/1",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: apparent lack of staffing in Cadastral and Other Technical Personnel","unverified","C124914500",39,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n38",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:39/10001",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: one cadastral drafting position; comparison chart indicates need for about three","unverified","C124914500",39,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n38",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:39/10002",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: no Other Technical positions; comparative chart indicates need for four or five","unverified","C124914500",39,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n38",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:39/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office cadastral drafting · finding: one cadastral drafting position; comparison chart indicates a need for about three","unverified","C124914500",39,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n38",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:39/3",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office other technical staff · finding: no other technical positions; comparative chart indicates need for four or five",null,"C124914500",39,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n38",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:40/3",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: may have more administrative staff than is necessary","unverified","C124914500",40,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n39",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:40/4",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: definite lack of technical staff other than appraisers, such as computer technicians","unverified","C124914500",40,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n39",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:40/5",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office weekly production reporting system · recommendation: further develop and improve weekly production reporting system as a management tool","unverified","C124914500",40,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n39",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:40/6",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office weekly production reporting system · finding: no standard report format or standard approach to identifying key workload categories","unverified","C124914500",40,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n39",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:41/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · recommendation: Develop and implement a monthly management reporting system for each division","unverified","C124914500",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n40",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:41/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · finding: Data entered into the weekly production report database is not cross-referenced or manipulated to generate reports","unverified","C124914500",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n40",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:41/3",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · finding: Executive-level management is not consistently apprised of division activities or the status of special assignments","unverified","C124914500",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n40",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:41/4",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · recommendation: Modify the weekly production report database program to perform cross-referencing and manipulation of data for management reports","unverified","C124914500",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n40",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:41/5",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · recommendation: Consolidate division monthly reports into one Assessor's Office Monthly Report distributed to the assessor, division chiefs and staff","unverified","C124914500",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n40",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:42/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office personnel system · finding: constrained by many more external controls than exist in the State system","unverified","C124914500",42,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n41",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:43/1",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office backfill of existing position · finding: minimum of 60 days to backfill a position","unverified","C124914500",43,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n42",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:44/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's office · recommendation: Review the Civil Service Rules and Regulations to determine hiring options for the assessor's office","unverified","C124914500",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n43",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:44/2",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's office · recommendation: Initiate a thorough review resulting in a summary report to the assessor as soon as possible","unverified","C124914500",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n43",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:44/4",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's office employment lists · finding: Majority of lists used by the assessor's office are rule of the list","unverified","C124914500",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n43",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:45/1",1996,1996,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: requirement to maintain appraiser training ignored for many years","unverified","C124914500",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n44",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:45/6",1996,1996,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: 40 percent of appraisers had training deficiencies","unverified","C124914500",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n44",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:45/7",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office appraisal staff · recommendation: Develop and adhere to a training plan for certificated appraisal and audit-appraisal staff","unverified","C124914500",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n44",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:45/8",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office orientation procedure · recommendation: Establish a checklist for the orientation procedure","unverified","C124914500",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n44",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:46/2",1996,1996,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · other: approximately 1,370 hours of training required annually to maintain status quo","unverified","C124914500",46,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n45",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:46/3",1996,1996,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: only one employee currently has advanced certification","unverified","C124914500",46,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n45",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:46/4",1996,1996,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: at least 10 other appraisers qualify for advanced certification but have not applied","unverified","C124914500",46,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n45",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:46/5",1996,1996,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: another seven employees will qualify for advanced certification after one more advanced SBE course","unverified","C124914500",46,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n45",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:46/6",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: centralize responsibility for monitoring training status in the assessment standards division","unverified","C124914500",46,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n45",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:49/12",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office, assessment appeals administration · recommendation: Upgrade the administration of assessment appeals: increase control over appraisal records, develop assessment appeal training, acquire computer software","unverified","C124914500",49,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n48",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:50/10001",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: lengthy history of poor appraisal record documentation, minimal record security, and low quality standards for appraisal files","unverified","C124914500",50,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n49",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:50/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: Assessor allowed contract appraisers to remove original appraisal files from the office","unverified","C124914500",50,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n49",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:50/3",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: Lengthy history of poor appraisal record documentation, minimal record security, and low quality standards for appraisal files",null,"C124914500",50,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n49",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:50/4",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: Assessor's representative frequently professed that appraisal records were lost or temporarily unavailable","unverified","C124914500",50,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n49",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:53/1",1996,1996,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office property tax exemption program · lead agency: Administered by the chief of technical services and four assessment clerks","unverified","C124914500",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n52",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:53/6",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"Exemption processing staff, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: No comprehensive set of written procedures to guide staff in processing any exemption claim","unverified","C124914500",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n52",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:53/7",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Exemption procedures manual, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Draft and use a formal procedures manual in daily exemption processing","unverified","C124914500",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n52",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:53/8",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Homeowners' exemption procedures, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Revise procedures for timelier identification of eligible condominium parcels and require cooperative housing filing documents","unverified","C124914500",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n52",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:54/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Homeowners' exemption unit, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Implement a procedure to identify eligible homeowners on new condominium parcels and process their claims in a timely manner","unverified","C124914500",54,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n53",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:54/3",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"Welfare exemption, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: Welfare exemption claim review indicated that much improvement is needed","unverified","C124914500",54,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n53",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:54/4",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Welfare exemption, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Recommendation 11: revise welfare exemption procedures, including adhering to filing requirements and expediting new claims","unverified","C124914500",54,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n53",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:55/1",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: Some field inspection reports recommended a full exemption despite disclosed taxable operations, late filings, or failure to file","unverified","C124914500",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n54",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:56/1",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office welfare exemption processing · finding: Processing new welfare exemption claims takes an extraordinary amount of time","unverified","C124914500",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n55",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:56/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office welfare exemption claims · finding: Claims pending for more than a year without enrollment of the exemption","unverified","C124914500",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n55",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:56/3",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office unsecured tax roll enrollment · other: Assessment number is assigned by order of entry on the unsecured tax roll and changes each year","unverified","C124914500",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n55",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:56/4",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office welfare exemption incomplete claims · recommendation: Send incomplete claims to the Board's Assessment Standards Division with a recommendation of denial after a reasonable time","unverified","C124914500",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n55",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:56/5",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Business property appraisal unit, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Immediately complete the backlog of field inspections of claimants' properties and assign a specific individual to make all inspections","unverified","C124914500",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n55",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:56/6",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office exemption unit supervisor · recommendation: Assign high priority to approving new welfare exemptions once all preliminary work is completed","unverified","C124914500",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n55",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:58/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's office, lessor's exemption procedures · finding: No formal procedure for handling property leased to qualified organizations","unverified","C124914500",58,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n57",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:59/1",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's office · finding: accepted incomplete exemption claims and granted the exemption, contrary to law","unverified","C124914500",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n58",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:59/2",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Exemption staff, Assessor's office · recommendation: accept only properly completed and signed claim forms for all miscellaneous exemptions","unverified","C124914500",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n58",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:59/4",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's office, exemptions staff · recommendation: forward to the business property division all information received regarding leased business personal property","unverified","C124914500",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n58",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:61/2",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco Assessor's Office homeowners' exemption procedure · recommendation: mail homeowners' exemption application to transferee; forward to real property section only after application returned or time expires","unverified","C124914500",61,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n60",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:61/3",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Assessor's Office appraisal records · finding: major deficiency in nearly each reviewed case was lack of documentation of why value was changed","unverified","C124914500",61,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n60",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:64/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office disaster relief ordinance · recommendation: Assessor request board of supervisors adopt a disaster relief ordinance reflecting Revenue and Taxation Code","unverified","C124914500",64,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n63",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:64/2",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office personal property disaster relief · recommendation: Grant disaster relief to all qualifying property, including personal property","unverified","C124914500",64,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n63",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:64/3",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: Practice of granting disaster relief only to real property","unverified","C124914500",64,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n63",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:65/3",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's office · recommendation: Utilize all available sources to discover damaged or destroyed property that may qualify for relief","unverified","C124914500",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n64",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:67/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco Assessor's Office · recommendation: Revise the list of transfers for public use to meet Section 408.1 requirements","unverified","C124914500",67,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n66",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:67/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Assessor's Office Ownership Ledger · finding: Ledger does not include transferor's name, consideration paid, or property address","unverified","C124914500",67,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n66",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:67/3",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco Assessor's Office Ownership Ledger · recommendation: Revise ownership ledger to add transferor's name, consideration paid, and property address fields","unverified","C124914500",67,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n66",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:67/4",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco Assessor's Office · recommendation: Develop and implement uniform policies and procedures for maintenance of records","unverified","C124914500",67,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n66",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:67/5",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Assessor's Office · finding: No formalized policy or regular procedure for updating, archiving, or destroying records","unverified","C124914500",67,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n66",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:68/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's office records management · recommendation: Establish records management policies, procedures, and standards for keeping and managing records and files","unverified","C124914500",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n67",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:69/5",1996,1996,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's office · other: staff of approximately 100 employees","unverified","C124914500",69,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n68",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:69/6",1996,1996,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's office · other: approximately 30 real property appraisers","unverified","C124914500",69,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n68",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:72/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Assessor's Office income property database · finding: proper database with sale, lease and expense information is still lacking","unverified","C124914500",72,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n71",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:72/3",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco Assessor's Office technical services section · recommendation: mail income questionnaire to each buyer of income-producing property","unverified","C124914500",72,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n71",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:77/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's office property transfer document processing · recommendation: Streamline property transfer document processing by reassigning responsibilities","unverified","C124914500",77,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n76",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:78/3",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: separate base year values not identified on appraisal records for some multiple fractional interest transfers","unverified","C124914500",78,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n77",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:79/5",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office supplemental assessment practice · finding: unwritten policy of not making supplemental assessments producing less than twenty dollars in revenue","unverified","C124914500",79,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n78",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:81/5",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Recommendation 26: establish procedures, controls, and areas of responsibility for reappraisal after changes in control","unverified","C124914500",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n80",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:85/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Reinstitute formalized procedures for processing, valuing, and enrolling assessable new construction","unverified","C124914500",85,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n84",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:85/2",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office assessment standards section · recommendation: Assign the assessment standards section to compile and write a procedures manual for valuation and enrollment of new construction","unverified","C124914500",85,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n84",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:85/3",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office management team · finding: Future plans include formation of a specialized crew to deal with the new construction backlog","unverified","C124914500",85,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n84",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:86/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Adopt a standard cost system and train appraisal staff in its use","unverified","C124914500",86,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n85",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:86/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: Most staff appraisers do not use a standard cost approach","unverified","C124914500",86,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n85",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:86/3",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Revise the procedure for taxpayer self-reporting of certain new construction","unverified","C124914500",86,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n85",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:87/1",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Assessor's Office · finding: self-reporting form not effectively used by appraisal staff","unverified","C124914500",87,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n86",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:87/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Assessor's Office appraisal district crews · finding: only one of four district crews uses self-reporting form with regularity","unverified","C124914500",87,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n86",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:87/4",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Assessor's Office appraisal staff · finding: appraiser selection and mailing of questionnaire adds clerical duty reducing production time","unverified","C124914500",87,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n86",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:87/5",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"Permit culling process, San Francisco County Assessor's office · finding: severely restricts incoming building permits examined by appraisal staff","unverified","C124914500",87,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n86",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:87/6",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Self-reporting form mailings, San Francisco Assessor's Office · recommendation: mailing of self-reporting form should be made by a single clerical unit","unverified","C124914500",87,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n86",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:89/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office permit data format · recommendation: discard the single line reporting format","unverified","C124914500",89,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n88",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:89/3",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office permit reports · recommendation: all permit reports contain adequate descriptions of the permitted work","unverified","C124914500",89,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n88",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:89/4",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: screening parameters include high dollar thresholds for estimated construction value and a Permit Bureau category","unverified","C124914500",89,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n88",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:90/1",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office permit screening · finding: discards about 90 percent of permits reported by the Permit Bureau","unverified","C124914500",90,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n89",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:90/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office permit screening · finding: only 10 percent of all permits are retained for appraisal review","unverified","C124914500",90,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n89",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:90/3",1996,1996,"","measure","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office permit screening · other: estimated construction costs must exceed $10,000 to be identified in the second printout report","unverified","C124914500",90,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n89",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:90/4",1996,1996,"","measure","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office permit screening · other: alterations and remodels under $100,000 are generally excluded from appraisal action","unverified","C124914500",90,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n89",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:90/6",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office enrollment from permits · other: enrollment level of approximately 45-50 percent in previous survey","unverified","C124914500",90,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n89",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:92/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office, discarded building permits · recommendation: Maintain a list of discarded building permits and periodically review it for accumulated construction activity at one site or project","unverified","C124914500",92,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n91",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:92/2",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office, discarded building permits · recommendation: List discarded permits alphabetically by assessee or lessee, and by APN","unverified","C124914500",92,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n91",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:93/1",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office building permit screening · finding: only a small portion of the permits received are documented in the appraisal records","unverified","C124914500",93,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n92",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:93/3",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office building permit processing · recommendation: expand building permit processing to log all permits in the affected appraisal record","unverified","C124914500",93,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n92",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:94/1",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: many property files contain building cards with inadequate appraisal entries of property descriptions","unverified","C124914500",94,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n93",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:94/2",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: adopt at least three building record forms for commercial, industrial, and residential uses","unverified","C124914500",94,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n93",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:97/1",1996,1996,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office, business property division · other: Secured structural costs above $50,000 forwarded to real property division","unverified","C124914500",97,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n96",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:97/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office, real property division · finding: No responses or analyses of reported tenant improvement costs to date","unverified","C124914500",97,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n96",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:97/5",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Levy supplemental assessments on all construction of new leasehold improvements","unverified","C124914500",97,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n96",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:98/1",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: no lease data is maintained in the appraisal files concerning current tenants, except for the largest and most valuable properties","unverified","C124914500",98,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n97",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:98/2",1996,1996,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: no investigation of reported tenant improvement costs is done by either the real property or the business property division","unverified","C124914500",98,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n97",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:98/3",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: insist on the uniform treatment of tenant improvements, including a common valuation methodology","unverified","C124914500",98,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n97",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:98/4",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office real property division · recommendation: investigate all items referred to it by the business property division","unverified","C124914500",98,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n97",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:101/4",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: Four of 14 differing cases due to escaped new construction (not enrolled)","unverified","C124914500",101,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n100",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:101/5",1996,1996,"1996","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Improve commercial property valuation: better file control, market data, specialized training, written procedures","unverified","C124914500",101,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n100",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:101/6",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office appraisal files · finding: Files on properties under assessment appeal reportedly could not be located on several occasions","unverified","C124914500",101,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n100",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:104/1",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office major property files · finding: only one of 30 major property files contained a drawing or plan view of the building","unverified","C124914500",104,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n103",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:104/2",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office cost approach analyses · finding: only one example of a cost analysis performed by the assessor's staff in reviewed major property files","unverified","C124914500",104,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n103",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:113/1",1996,1996,"1996","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office mandatory audit program · recommendation: Bring the mandatory audit program up to current status","unverified","C124914500",113,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n112",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:113/2",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office personal property division mandatory audit program · finding: serious problem with the status of the mandatory audit program","unverified","C124914500",113,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n112",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:131/1",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: Assessor's staff do not process the Form 600-B's listing leased equipment of nonunitary public utilities and railroads","unverified","C124914500",131,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n130",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:131/2",1996,1996,"1996","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Enroll escape assessments for equipment on all unprocessed Form 600-B's and require annual, timely processing of these forms","unverified","C124914500",131,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n130",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:133/1",1996,1996,"1996","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Revise escape assessment procedures; process business property statements before completing the assessment roll; cite Section 531 and give notices under Section 531.8","unverified","C124914500",133,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n132",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:169/1",1996,1996,"1996","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · recommendation: Additional staff needed to comply with Auditor's recommendation 7 on obtaining HRD delegation","unverified","C124914500",169,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n168",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:17/1",1996,1996,"1996","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: 52 formal recommendations for improvements","unverified","C124914500",17,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n16",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:185/2",1996,1996,"1996","agency","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · finding: Did not add Section 463 penalty to improperly signed statements; will implement for 1996 statements","unverified","C124914500",185,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n184",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:19/1",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office, real property assessment · recommendation: five recommendations on revaluing properties that have changed ownership","unverified","C124914500",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n18",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:19/2",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office, new construction assessment · recommendation: seven recommendations on discovering, valuing, and assessing new construction","unverified","C124914500",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n18",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:19/3",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office, new construction assessment · finding: new construction assessment program has reached a critical point","unverified","C124914500",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n18",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:19/4",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office, business property mandatory audit program · finding: serious problem with the status of the mandatory audit program in the personal property division","unverified","C124914500",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n18",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:21/1",1996,1996,"1996","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's office · recommendation: Develop and adhere to a training plan for certificated appraisal and audit-appraisal staff","unverified","C124914500",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n20",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:21/2",1996,1996,"1996","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's office · recommendation: Upgrade administration of assessment appeals, including control over appraisal records and training","unverified","C124914500",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n20",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:31/1",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office assessment standards section · recommendation: Redefine the assessment standards section as the standards and quality control unit","unverified","C124914500",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n30",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:31/2",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"Assessment standards section · finding: Section staffed with a chief, a property transfer assistant, an assessment clerk, and two senior assessment clerks; one senior clerk position vacant at time of survey","unverified","C124914500",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n30",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:31/3",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"Assessment standards section · finding: Section performs appraisal, technical services and clerical functions, leaving little or no time for standards and quality control work","unverified","C124914500",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n30",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:31/4",1996,1996,"1996","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessment standards section · recommendation: Remove all line functions from its responsibility; standards unit to write administrative and operational procedures first","unverified","C124914500",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n30",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:47/1",1996,1996,"1996","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office clerical staff (real property and personal property divisions) · recommendation: Cross-train and rotate clerk typist, senior clerk typist, and assessment clerk staff between divisions","unverified","C124914500",47,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n46",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:70/1",1996,1996,"1996","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's office, San Francisco County · recommendation: Establish an appraisal activity system to help identify and prioritize the real property workload","unverified","C124914500",70,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n69",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:71/1",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: does not have an appraisal activity system","unverified","C124914500",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n70",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:71/2",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office management information system · finding: current technology is of 1960's vintage","unverified","C124914500",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n70",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:71/4",1996,1996,"1996","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office appraisal program · recommendation: Create and maintain an appraisal data bank","unverified","C124914500",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n70",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:76/1",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's office change in ownership processing · finding: cumbersome and inefficient","unverified","C124914500",76,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n75",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:76/2",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's office change in ownership processing · finding: documents handled by three different sections","unverified","C124914500",76,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n75",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:84/1",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"New construction backlog, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: estimated $500 million of unworked construction value in backlog of building permits","unverified","C124914500",84,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n83",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:84/2",1996,1996,"1996","recommendation","study or report",null,"New construction backlog, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Eliminate the current backlog of assessable new construction","unverified","C124914500",84,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n83",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:84/3",1996,1996,"1996","recommendation","study or report",null,"Separate appraisal crew for assessable new construction, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Create a separate appraisal crew to appraise assessable new construction","unverified","C124914500",84,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n83",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:91/1",1996,1996,"1996","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office building permit screening guidelines · recommendation: revise screening guidelines to specify construction that must be examined by appraisal staff","unverified","C124914500",91,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n90",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:91/2",1996,1996,"1996","agency","study or report",null,"Assessment standards section · finding: three clerical positions assigned to handle clerical support functions","unverified","C124914500",91,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n90",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:91/3",1996,1996,"1996","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office building permit processing · recommendation: form an adequately staffed work section within the technical services unit to receive, screen and track building permits","unverified","C124914500",91,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n90",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:96/1",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: serious problems with the way tenant improvements are assessed","unverified","C124914500",96,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n95",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:96/2",1996,1996,"1996","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · recommendation: Revise procedures for assessing tenant improvements: value and enroll tenant improvements uniformly","unverified","C124914500",96,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n95",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:96/3",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"Real property division, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: reported construction costs after base year do not represent assessable new construction","unverified","C124914500",96,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n95",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:96/4",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"Real property division, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: tenant improvements added after base year must be assessed as new construction as of completion date","unverified","C124914500",96,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n95",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:96/5",1996,1996,"1996","finding","study or report",null,"Real property division, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: takes no action to investigate unsecured tenant account property statements","unverified","C124914500",96,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n95",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich:20/12",1996,1996,"1996-05-06","ordinance",null,"referred","Proposed salary ordinance change creating six Assessor's Office positions was referred to Budget Committee.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich",20,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich/page/n19",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich:20/9",1996,1996,"1996-05-06","ordinance",null,"referred","Proposed $357,249 (≈ $767,186 in 2026 dollars) state loan appropriation for six Assessor's Office positions to cut assessment backlog was referred to Budget Committee.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich",20,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich/page/n19",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich:68/5",1996,1996,"1996-05-20","ordinance",null,"referred","Ordinance proposed to appropriate funds for a new integrated property tax computer system for the Assessor's Office; referred to Budget Committee.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich",68,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich/page/n67",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich:68/8",1996,1996,"1996-05-20","ordinance",null,"referred","Ordinance proposed to add two Assessor's Office positions to the salary ordinance; referred to Budget Committee.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich",68,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich/page/n67",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich:82/2",1996,1996,"1996-05-28","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Assessor's Office receives $357,249 (≈ $767,186 in 2026 dollars) in state loan revenue to hire six staff and reduce its assessment backlog; passed for second reading.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich",82,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich/page/n81",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich:82/3",1996,1996,"1996-05-28","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Salary ordinance adds six positions at the Assessor's Office; passed for second reading.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich",82,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich/page/n81",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich:102/3",1996,1996,"1996-06-03","ordinance",null,"passed","Supervisors finally passed an ordinance giving the Assessor's Office $357,249 (≈ $767,186 in 2026 dollars) in state loan money to hire six staff and cut its backlog.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich",102,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich/page/n101",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich:102/4",1996,1996,"1996-06-03","ordinance",null,"passed","Supervisors finally passed a salary ordinance adding six positions at the Assessor's Office, companion to the funding measure.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich",102,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich/page/n101",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich:105/3",1996,1996,"1996-06-03","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Supervisors passed on first reading $3.3M (≈ $7.1 million in 2026 dollars) for a new integrated property tax computer system for the Assessor's Office.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich",105,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich/page/n104",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.11],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich:105/4",1996,1996,"1996-06-03","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Supervisors passed on first reading an amendment to the salary ordinance creating two new Assessor's Office positions.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich",105,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich/page/n104",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich:125/1",1996,1996,"1996-06-10","ordinance",null,"passed","Salary ordinance amended to create two new positions in the Assessor's Office; finally passed.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich",125,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich/page/n124",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.38],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:176/1",1996,1996,"April 1996","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office, Section 506 interest procedure · recommendation: Assessor concurs and will adopt a formal procedure for Section 506 interest on the Secured and [name withheld]","unverified","C124914500",176,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n175",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:177/3",1996,1996,"February 16, 1995","action","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · event: Policy statement on reappraisal of change-in-ownership foreclosures issued","unverified","C124914500",177,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n176",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:171/1",1996,1996,"January 10","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office welfare exemption program · other: Approximately 5,000 applications must be filed by the required due date to avoid late filing fees","unverified","C124914500",171,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n170",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:90/5",1996,1996,"January 1994","event","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office standards unit audit · other: brief audit of permits under $10,000 by questionnaire to 50 assessees","unverified","C124914500",90,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n89",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:167/1",1996,1996,"July 1, 1994","action","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office weekly time and production reporting system · event: weekly time and production reporting system initiated for all divisions","unverified","C124914500",167,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n166",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:45/2",1996,1996,"July 1, 1994","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · other: 59 appraisers on staff","unverified","C124914500",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n44",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:45/3",1996,1996,"July 1, 1994","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · other: 2 appraisers with training deficiencies exceeding 200 hours","unverified","C124914500",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n44",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:45/4",1996,1996,"July 1, 1994","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · other: 12 appraisers deficient between 50 and 200 hours","unverified","C124914500",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n44",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:45/5",1996,1996,"July 1, 1994","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · other: seven appraisers deficient between 24 and 50 hours","unverified","C124914500",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n44",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:169/2",1996,1996,"July 1, 1997","event","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · event: merging the two departments","unverified","C124914500",169,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n168",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:34/2",1996,1996,"July 1994","event","study or report",null,"Assessor's office Local Area Network · other: LAN installed, running Novell Network 3.12; 13 PC-based workstations connected","unverified","C124914500",34,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n33",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:72/1",1996,1996,"July 1994","event","study or report",null,"San Francisco Assessor's Office Local Area Network · other: Local Area Network (LAN) system established","unverified","C124914500",72,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n71",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:167/3",1996,1996,"July 1996","project","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office management reports · event: Management reports will be available with help from Information Systems Development Department","unverified","C124914500",167,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n166",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:16/9",1996,1996,"June 1994","event","study or report",null,"Time reporting system, San Francisco County Assessor's office · event: Studies began and system installed about six months prior to fieldwork","unverified","C124914500",16,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n15",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:170/5",1996,1996,"June 22, 1994; August 2, 1994","event","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office appeals training · event: Training sessions held for contract appraisers and assessor's staff on appeals process","unverified","C124914500",170,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n169",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:133/2",1996,1996,"June 30","event","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · event: Staff completed the 1995-96 assessment roll","unverified","C124914500",133,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n132",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:114/1",1996,1996,"June 30, 1995","finding","study or report",null,"Personal property division, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: 428 of 590 mandatory audits completed, 76 percent, as of June 30, 1995","unverified","C124914500",114,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n113",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:114/2",1996,1996,"June 30, 1995","finding","study or report",null,"Personal property division, San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: 162 business accounts due for audit not completed; 62 waivers obtained, 38 percent","unverified","C124914500",114,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n113",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:186/1",1996,1996,"June 30, 1995","finding","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office business account data base · other: 38,436 business accounts assessed up to June 30, 1995","unverified","C124914500",186,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n185",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:177/2",1996,1996,"June 30, 1996","action","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · event: Policy, forms, and procedure for multiple fractional interest value calculations in place","unverified","C124914500",177,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n176",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:173/1",1996,1996,"March 15, 1996","recommendation","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office homeowners exemption procedures · recommendation: Homeowners exemption procedures will be reviewed by March 15, 1996","unverified","C124914500",173,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n172",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:169/3",1996,1996,"March 1995","event","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · other: six appraiser trainees hired","unverified","C124914500",169,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n168",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:169/4",1996,1996,"November 10, 1995","event","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office · event: 21 real property appraisers and two auditors sent to Dynamics of Office Building Valuation seminar","unverified","C124914500",169,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n168",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:81/1",1996,1996,"Since 1981","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: notified of changes in control of 230 entities owning approximately 620 real property parcels","unverified","C124914500",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n80",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:46/1",1996,1996,"first quarter of fiscal year 1995-96","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · finding: 563 hours of appraiser training completed by staff","unverified","C124914500",46,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n45",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:42/1",1996,1996,"fiscal year 1995-96","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's Office · jobs: approximately 107 budgeted positions","unverified","C124914500",42,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n41",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:16/6",1996,1996,"three years before the report","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco County Assessor's office personal computers · other: Only two personal computers available to whole staff before the assessor took office","unverified","C124914500",16,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n15",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:188/2",1996,1997,"1997","event","study or report",null,"Assessor's Office, lien date · other: Lien date changed to January 1, 1997","unverified","C124914500",188,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n187",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich:23/1",1997,1997,"1997-05-05","ordinance",null,"referred","A $250,000 (≈ $524,829 in 2026 dollars) appropriation for the Assessor's Office legal services was referred to the Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich",23,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich/page/n22",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich:74/3",1997,1997,"1997-05-27","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Board passed on second reading a $250,000 (≈ $524,829 in 2026 dollars) appropriation for Assessor's Office legal services in fiscal 1996-97.","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich",74,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich/page/n73",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich:94/3",1997,1997,"1997-06-02","ordinance",null,"passed","Assessor's Office received $250,000 (≈ $524,829 in 2026 dollars) from the General Fund Reserve for legal services; ordinance finally passed.","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich",94,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich/page/n93",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.3],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2000sanf_0:29/4",2000,2000,"2000-05-01","ordinance",null,"referred","Proposed $315,167 (≈ $616,680 in 2026 dollars) for Assessor's Office litigation over VIACOM's assessment appeal was sent to the Finance and Labor Committee.","quoted","meetingminutesb2000sanf_0",29,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2000sanf_0/page/n28",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesmayaug95sanfrich:29/4",2000,2000,"2000-05-01","ordinance",null,"referred","Controller proposed $315,167 (≈ $616,680 in 2026 dollars) from the General Fund Reserve for Assessor's Office litigation over the VIACOM assessment, referred to committee.","quoted","meetingminutesmayaug95sanfrich",29,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesmayaug95sanfrich/page/n28",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2000sanf_0:174/1",2000,2000,"2000-05-30","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Ordinance appropriating $284,887 (≈ $557,432 in 2026 dollars) for Assessor's Office litigation over the VIACOM assessment appeal passed first reading.","quoted","meetingminutesb2000sanf_0",174,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2000sanf_0/page/n173",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesmayaug95sanfrich:121/1",2000,2000,"2000-05-30","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Ordinance proposed to appropriate $284,887 (≈ $557,432 in 2026 dollars) for Assessor's Office litigation over the Viacom assessment appeal; passed first reading.","quoted","meetingminutesmayaug95sanfrich",121,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesmayaug95sanfrich/page/n120",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2000sanf_0:208/2",2000,2000,"2000-06-05","ordinance",null,"passed","Assessor's Office gets $284,887 (≈ $557,432 in 2026 dollars) from the General Fund Reserve to fight the VIACOM assessment appeal, ordinance finally passed.","quoted","meetingminutesb2000sanf_0",208,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2000sanf_0/page/n207",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingseptdecminutes95sanfrich:344/1",2000,2000,"2000-12-04","ordinance",null,"referred","Ordinance to fund Assessor's Office litigation and efficiency program was sent to the Finance and Labor Committee.","quoted","meetingseptdecminutes95sanfrich",344,"https://archive.org/details/meetingseptdecminutes95sanfrich/page/n339",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesjanapr96sanfrich:106/5",2001,2001,"2001-01-29","ordinance",null,"passed","$471,593 (≈ $897,225 in 2026 dollars) from the General Reserve approved for Assessor's Office litigation over VIACOM, AT&T and TCI appeals.","quoted","meetingminutesjanapr96sanfrich",106,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesjanapr96sanfrich/page/n101",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/1meetingminutes2003sanf:102/1",2003,2003,null,"other",null,null,"Assessor's office was directed to report on reorganization and performance measures, with measures due May 1, 2003.","quoted","1meetingminutes2003sanf",102,"https://archive.org/details/1meetingminutes2003sanf/page/n101",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/1meetingminutes2003sanf:5/1",2003,2003,null,"hearing",null,"referred","Supervisor Dufty's request for a hearing on the Assessor's Office backlog was transferred to the Finance and Audits Committee.","quoted","1meetingminutes2003sanf",5,"https://archive.org/details/1meetingminutes2003sanf/page/n4",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2003sanf:227/4",2003,2003,null,"hearing",null,"referred","Supervisor Dufty's hearing request on the Assessor's Office work backlog was assigned to the Finance Committee.","quoted","meetingminutesbo2003sanf",227,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2003sanf/page/n226",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesjanmar98sanfrich:221/4",2003,2003,"2003-02-11","hearing",null,"referred","Supervisor Dufty's requested hearing on the Assessor's Office backlog was received and assigned to the Finance Committee.","quoted","meetingminutesjanmar98sanfrich",221,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesjanmar98sanfrich/page/n216",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/1meetingminutes2003sanf|g41",2003,2003,"2003-03-05","ordinance","budget","pending","Assessor's office gets $548,820 (≈ $1.0 million in 2026 dollars) to clear backlogs; not final.","quoted","1meetingminutes2003sanf",98,"https://archive.org/details/1meetingminutes2003sanf/page/n97",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/2meetingminutes2003sanf:8/3",2003,2003,"2003-05-07","hearing",null,"continued","Finance and Audits Committee continued a hearing on the Assessor's Office work backlog and performance timelines to the call of the chair.","quoted","2meetingminutes2003sanf",8,"https://archive.org/details/2meetingminutes2003sanf/page/n7",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/2meetingminutes2003sanf|g23",2003,2003,"2003-05-07",null,"budget","pending","Money proposed to clear Assessor's office backlog","unverified","2meetingminutes2003sanf",22,"https://archive.org/details/2meetingminutes2003sanf/page/n21",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/2meetingminutes2003sanf:89/3",2003,2003,"2003-05-21","hearing",null,"continued","Hearing on backlog and performance timelines at the Assessor's Office was continued to June 4, 2003.","quoted","2meetingminutes2003sanf",89,"https://archive.org/details/2meetingminutes2003sanf/page/n88",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/2meetingminutes2003sanf|g83",2003,2003,"2003-05-21",null,"budget","pending","Assessor's office proposed $544K (≈ $996,170 in 2026 dollars) to clear its work backlog.","unverified","2meetingminutes2003sanf",269,"https://archive.org/details/2meetingminutes2003sanf/page/n268",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/2meetingminutes2003sanf:284/2",2003,2003,"2003-06-04","hearing",null,"continued","Hearing on the Assessor's Office work backlog and performance timelines, sponsored by Supervisor Dufty, continued to June 18, 2003.","quoted","2meetingminutes2003sanf",284,"https://archive.org/details/2meetingminutes2003sanf/page/n283",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/2meetingminutes2003sanf:474/1",2003,2003,"2003-06-18","hearing",null,null,"Committee filed Supervisor Dufty's hearing on the Assessor's Office backlog and performance timelines.","quoted","2meetingminutes2003sanf",474,"https://archive.org/details/2meetingminutes2003sanf/page/n473",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2010sanf_2:356/4",2010,2010,"2010-12-14","motion",null,"referred","Motion proposed directing the Budget and Legislative Analyst to audit city advertising revenue, premium pay, and Assessor's Office hiring.","quoted","meetingminutesb2010sanf_2",356,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2010sanf_2/page/n355",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2014sanf_0|g662",2014,2014,"2014-11-18",null,"admin","pending","Assessor's office would add staff posts for a state grant; in committee.","unverified","meetingminutesb2014sanf_0",204,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2014sanf_0/page/n203",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2014sanf_0|g663",2014,2014,"2014-11-18",null,"admin","pending","Assessor's office would add staff posts for a state grant; in committee.","unverified","meetingminutesb2014sanf_0",204,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2014sanf_0/page/n203",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2014sanf_0|g673",2014,2014,"2014-11-18",null,"budget","pending","Assessor's office would take $1.28 (≈ $1.82 in 2026 dollars)5 million state grant; in committee.","unverified","meetingminutesb2014sanf_0",205,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2014sanf_0/page/n204",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2014sanf_0|g922",2014,2014,"2014-12-16",null,"admin","pending","Five grant-funded jobs for Assessor's office proposed; needs final vote.","unverified","meetingminutesb2014sanf_0",282,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2014sanf_0/page/n281",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2014sanf_0|g923",2014,2014,"2014-12-16",null,"admin","pending","Five grant-funded jobs for Assessor's office proposed; needs final vote.","unverified","meetingminutesb2014sanf_0",282,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2014sanf_0/page/n281",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2014sanf_0|g935",2014,2014,"2014-12-16",null,"budget","unknown","Assessor's office may accept $1.28 (≈ $1.82 in 2026 dollars)5 million state grant.","unverified","meetingminutesb2014sanf_0",284,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2014sanf_0/page/n283",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2014sanf_0|g936",2014,2014,"2014-12-16","resolution","budget","passed","Assessor's office allowed to accept $1.28 (≈ $1.82 in 2026 dollars)5 million grant","quoted","meetingminutesb2014sanf_0",284,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2014sanf_0/page/n283",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.91],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesdr2015sanf|g13",2015,2015,"2015-01-13",null,"admin","passed","Five grant-paid jobs added to property assessor's office.","unverified","meetingminutesdr2015sanf",17,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesdr2015sanf/page/n16",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesdr2015sanf|g14",2015,2015,"2015-01-13",null,"admin","passed","Five grant-paid jobs added to property assessor's office.","unverified","meetingminutesdr2015sanf",17,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesdr2015sanf/page/n16",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2015sanf_2|g78",2015,2015,"2015-09-15",null,"admin","passed","Assessor's office cash fund raised from $300 (≈ $426 in 2026 dollars) to $650 (≈ $924 in 2026 dollars)","unverified","meetingminutesb2015sanf_2",36,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2015sanf_2/page/n35",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2015sanf_2|g79",2015,2015,"2015-09-15",null,"admin","passed","Assessor's office cash fund raised from $300 (≈ $426 in 2026 dollars) to $650 (≈ $924 in 2026 dollars).","unverified","meetingminutesb2015sanf_2",36,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2015sanf_2/page/n35",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag041223|36",2023,2023,"2023-04-12","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Assessor's office joins state tech group for up to $30 million (≈ $33.2 million in 2026 dollars), approved","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag041223_minutes.pdf#page=11",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.39]]}