{"id":null,"ids":[],"kind":"named in documents","name":"Bay Bridge","tied_by":"name","block":null,"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:11/3",1977,600,"0600 to 0642","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · finding: highly significant flow reductions found","unverified","C124901922",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n10",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:60/1",1977,700,"0700-0830","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: traffic flow increased consistently between 0700 and 0830 after BART","unverified","C124901922",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n59",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1921sanfrich:533/2",1921,1921,null,"resolution",null,"passed","Board asked Alameda, San Mateo and nearby cities to appoint committees to study a San Francisco Bay bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed1921sanfrich",533,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1921sanfrich/page/n532",null,"Bay Bridge. Supervisor Welch jjresented: Resolution No. 18961 (New Series), as follows: Whereas, public interest requires",null,null,"n","a",0,2.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1921sanfrich:559/2",1921,1921,"1921-06-20","communication","transit","referred","Several groups' endorsements of the proposed Bay Bridge were referred to the Board's Special Bridge Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed1921sanfrich",559,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1921sanfrich/page/n558",null,"Communications — From The San Francisco Labor Council, The Park Presidio Improvement Ass'n, Menlo Park Chamber of Commerce",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1921sanfrich:719/9",1921,1921,"1921-07-25","resolution","transit",null,"Supervisor Power presented a resolution asking the War Department to approve a Bay bridge linking San Francisco cities.","quoted","journalofproceed1921sanfrich",719,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1921sanfrich/page/n718",null,"War Department to Approve Bay Bridge. Supervisor Power presented: Resolution No. 19106 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1921sanfrich:834/2",1921,1921,"1921-09-06","motion",null,"referred","Supervisor Welch's proposal to appropriate $150,000 (≈ $2.8 million in 2026 dollars) for a Bay Bridge preliminary survey was referred to the Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed1921sanfrich",834,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1921sanfrich/page/n833",null,"Bay Bridge Survey. Supervisor Welch raised the question of providing at this time for an appropriation of $150,000",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1921sanfrich:846/1",1921,1921,"1921-09-12","resolution",null,"passed first reading","Supervisor McLeran's resolution to appropriate $5,000 (≈ $94,117 in 2026 dollars) from the Urgent Necessity Fund for a San Francisco Bay bridge hearing was passed for printing.","quoted","journalofproceed1921sanfrich",846,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1921sanfrich/page/n845",null,"Whereupon, the following resolution was presented by Supervisor McLeran and passed for printing:",null,null,"n","a",0,0.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1921sanfrich:847/1",1921,1921,"1921-09-12","resolution",null,"referred","Resolution on a San Francisco Bay bridge petition, with a War Department hearing set for October 7, sent to the Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed1921sanfrich",847,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1921sanfrich/page/n846",null,"Thereupon, the following resolution, presented by Supervisors Welch, was ordered referred to the Finance Committee",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1921sanfrich:858/4",1921,1921,"1921-09-12","resolution",null,"referred","Supervisor Welch proposed a resolution asking city funds for a Bay Bridge survey before a federal hearing on October 7, 1921.","quoted","journalofproceed1921sanfrich",858,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1921sanfrich/page/n857",null,"Requesting City to Provide Funds for Bay Bridge Survey, etc. Supervisor Welch presented: Resolution No. (New Series)",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1921sanfrich:859/2",1921,1921,"1921-09-13","resolution","transit","referred","Supervisor Welch proposed city funds for Bay Bridge surveys; referred to the Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed1921sanfrich",859,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1921sanfrich/page/n858",null,"Resolution No. (New Series), as follows: Whereas, the Counties of San Francisco and Alameda jointly petitioned the United States",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1921sanfrich:915/1",1921,1921,"1921-09-26","resolution",null,"passed","Payment of $1,500 (≈ $28,235 in 2026 dollars) to Vipond Davies for data and maps for the proposed bay bridge project approved.","quoted","journalofproceed1921sanfrich",915,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1921sanfrich/page/n914",null,"Bay Bridge, Account Resolution No. (N. S.) Vipond Davies, for services of Mcdjeska and Davies, preparing data for War Department",null,null,"n","a",0,2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1921sanfrich|888",1921,1921,"1921-09-26","resolution","public-money","passed","$1,500 (≈ $28,235 in 2026 dollars) paid for maps and data on the proposed bay bridge","unverified","journalofproceed1921sanfrich",915,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1921sanfrich/page/n914",null,"Resolution No. (N. S.) (45) Vipond Davies, for services of Mcdjeska and Davies, preparing data for War Department; also maps in connection with proposed bay bridge project, $1,500. Ayes — Supervisors Bath, Deasy, Hayden, Hilmer, Lahaney, McLeran, Mc- Sheehy, Mulvihill. Nelson, Power, Powen3, Schmitz",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1921sanfrich:962/1",1921,1921,"1921-10-10","resolution",null,"passed","Appropriation of $1,800 (≈ $33,882 in 2026 dollars) to Ralph Modjeska for Bay Bridge project maps and hearing expenses approved.","quoted","journalofproceed1921sanfrich",962,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1921sanfrich/page/n961",null,"Appropriation $1,800, Bay Bridge Project. Resolution No. 19312 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,2.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1922sanfrich:352/1",1922,1922,"1922-04-10","resolution",null,"passed","Board resolves to join San Mateo County in forming a joint highway district for a peninsula highway and bay bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed1922sanfrich",352,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1922sanfrich/page/n351",null,"Joint Highway District. Supervisor Welch presented: Resolution No. 19878 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,2.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1922sanfrich|1226",1922,1922,"1922-11-20","resolution","the-street","passed","City guarantees $225,000 (≈ $4.5 million in 2026 dollars) for San Mateo highway and bay bridge","unverified","journalofproceed1922sanfrich",1088,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1922sanfrich/page/n1087",null,"Resolution No. 20492 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco hereby reiterates its position in joining with the Board of Supervisors of San Mateo County and continuing the work of the Joint Highway District for the purpose of building",null,null,"n","a",0,2.79],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1925sanfrich:1075/2",1925,1925,"1925-07-06","other","transit","referred","Mayor's office forwarded M. K. Miller's letter opposing James Oliver's bay bridge franchise, referred to committees.","quoted","journalofproceed1925sanfrich",1075,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1925sanfrich/page/n1074",null,"Relative to James Oliver's Bay Bridge Project. The following was presented, read by the Clerk and referred to the Commercial",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:533/2",1926,1926,"1926-04-05","hearing","transit","continued","Hearing on Construction Company of North America's Bay Bridge franchise application was continued to April 26, 1926.","quoted","journalofproceed21sanfrich",533,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n533",null,"Application of Construction Company of North America for Bay Bridge Franchise.",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:534/1",1926,1926,"1926-04-05","hearing","transit","continued","Hearing on the Construction Company of North America's Bay Bridge franchise application was continued to April 26, 1926.","quoted","journalofproceed21sanfrich",534,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n534",null,"Application of Construction Company of North America for Bay Bridge Franchise. The following matter was presented and hearing continued until April 26, 1926",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:734/1",1926,1926,"1926-05-10","motion",null,"continued","Board continued hearings on bay bridge applications, with City Attorney to give an opinion in one week.","quoted","journalofproceed21sanfrich",734,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n734",null,"Supervisor Shannon, seconded by Supervisor Gallagher, moved that the action taken by the Board",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:1046/2",1926,1926,"1926-06-14","communication",null,"continued","Edward A. Bertram's application for a San Francisco Bay Bridge franchise was put off until June 21, 1926.","quoted","journalofproceed21sanfrich",1046,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n1046",null,"Relative to Bay Bridge Hearings. The following was presented and read by the Clerk and filed: Communication, from Edward A. Bertram",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich|1390",1926,1926,"1926-06-14","resolution","running-the-city",null,"Edward Bertram to ask for a San Francisco Bay bridge franchise","unverified","journalofproceed21sanfrich",1046,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n1046",null,"Resolution. The following was presented and read by the Clerk: Communication, from the National Progress Club of San Francisco, transmitting resolutions of said organization unanimously adopted at its last meeting emphatically endorsing resolution of Board of Supervisors of May 24, 1926, calling upo",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceed21sanfrich/1046/8058d27f",1926,1926,"1926-06-14","resolution",null,"referred","Edward Bertram to ask for a San Francisco Bay bridge franchise","unverified","journalofproceed21sanfrich",1046,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n1046",null,"Protest, of Gronosky Bros, and other residents and property owners in the immediate vicinity, against the granting of a permit for a gasoline service station at the northeast corner of Balboa street and Thirtythird avenue.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceed21sanfrich/1046/9c2bbc11",1926,1926,"1926-06-14","resolution",null,"continued","Edward Bertram to ask for a San Francisco Bay bridge franchise","unverified","journalofproceed21sanfrich",1046,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n1046",null,"Over until June 21, 1926, 3 p. m. Protest…",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:1142/2",1926,1926,"1926-06-28","other",null,"continued","R. Lee Dunn's application for a Bay bridge franchise was continued to July 6, 1926.","quoted","journalofproceed21sanfrich",1142,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n1142",null,"Consideration of application of R. Lee Dunn for bridge franchise.",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:1142/5",1926,1926,"1926-06-28","other",null,"referred","Proof that notice of E. A. Bertram's double-deck Bay bridge application was published six times; referred to committee.","unverified","journalofproceed21sanfrich",1142,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n1142",null,"Affidavit of J. C. Eisenhart, principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the San Francisco Bulletin",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:1142/7",1926,1926,"1926-06-28","other",null,"referred","Proof that notices of A. O. Stewart's proposed Bay bridge franchise were posted in three city locations; referred to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed21sanfrich",1142,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n1142",null,"Affidavit, C. D. Silva, affirming that he posted three notices in the matter of the application of A. O. Stewart",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:1232/1",1926,1926,"1926-07-12","resolution",null,"continued","Inter-Cities Bridge Company applied for authority to build and charge tolls on a bay bridge from San Francisco to Alameda County.","quoted","journalofproceed21sanfrich",1232,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n1232",null,"Application of the Inter-Cities Bridge Company, a corporation, for authority to erect, maintain, operate and",null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:1260/9",1926,1926,"1926-07-19","hearing",null,"continued","Hearing on the Inter-Cities Bridge Co.'s bay bridge franchise application was continued to August 10, 1926.","quoted","journalofproceed21sanfrich",1260,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n1260",null,"Consideration of application of Inter-Cities Bridge Co. for a bay bridge franchise.",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:1635/2",1926,1926,"1926-10-04","resolution",null,"passed","Board authorizes its Special Bridge Committee to hire three independent bridge engineers to study a San Francisco Bay bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed21sanfrich",1635,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n1635",null,"Appointment of Advisory Bridge Engineer. Supervisor Shannon presented: Resolution No. 26275",null,null,"n","a",0,2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:1635/3",1926,1926,"1926-10-04","motion",null,"passed","Board approved sending a three-member committee to Washington to learn War Department requirements for a Bay bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed21sanfrich",1635,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n1635",null,"San Francisco Supervisorial Bridge Committee to Go to Washington, D. C.",null,null,"n","a",0,4.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:1889/3",1926,1926,"1926-11-22","resolution",null,"referred","Supervisor McSheehy proposed a city-controlled bay bridge policy, which was referred to the Special Bridge Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed21sanfrich",1889,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n1889",null,"Resolution of Policy, Bay Bridge. Supervisor McSheehy presented:",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:1977/1",1926,1926,"1926-12-06","resolution","transit","referred","Supervisor Shannon's resolution to condemn Mission Rock for the bay bridge pier was referred to the Special Bridge Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed21sanfrich",1977,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n1977",null,"Resolution No. (New Series), Condemnation of Mission Rock for Bridge Pier, Supervisor Shannon presented",null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:2050/3",1926,1926,"1926-12-13","resolution",null,"referred","Supervisor Hayden's proposed resolution asks the Board of Public Works to study a Bay bridge from San Francisco to Alameda; referred to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed21sanfrich",2050,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n2050",null,"Bridges Across the Bay. The following resolution was introduced by Supervisor Hayden and referred to the Special Bridge Committee",null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:2102/2",1926,1926,"1926-12-20","other",null,"continued","New York and San Francisco Development Company's Bay bridge franchise application was continued to December 27, 1926.","quoted","journalofproceed21sanfrich",2102,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n2102",null,"Application of New York and San Francisco Development Company for franchise to construct",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:2130/2",1926,1926,"1926-12-27","motion",null,"referred","Supervisor Gallagher moved that a vote on San Francisco Bay bridge franchises be set for January 17, 1927; referred to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed21sanfrich",2130,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n2130",null,"Supervisor Gallagher moved that January 17, 1927, be set for a vote on the granting of a franchise",null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:37/5",1927,1927,"1927-01-10","other","transit",null,"Robert E. Fitzgerald applied for a franchise to build and charge tolls on a bay bridge from The Embarcadero to Oakland.","unverified","journalofproceed22sanfrich",37,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n37",null,"Application of Robert E. Fitzgerald for franchise to erect, maintain and operate and take tolls",null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:207/1",1927,1927,"1927-01-31","other","transit","passed","The Special Bridge Committee proposes private construction of the Bay Bridge under a city franchise, with public ownership later; outcome continues.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",207,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n207",null,"BRIDGE MATTERS. Excerpt From Minutes of Special Bridge Committee, Saturday, January 22, 1927.",null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:214/1",1927,1927,"1927-01-31","motion",null,null,"Supervisor Gallagher moved to file the Bridge Committee's pending report on a San Francisco Bay bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",214,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n214",null,"Supervisor Gallagher, seconded by Supervisor Schmidt, thereupon moved that the report of the Bridge Committee,",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:227/5",1927,1927,"1927-01-31","other",null,"continued","Robert E. Fitzgerald applied for a franchise to build and charge tolls on a bay bridge from The Embarcadero to Oakland; put over to a later meeting, no final vote found.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",227,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n227",null,"Application of Robert E. Fitzgerald for franchise to erect, maintain and operate and take tolls on a toll",null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:344/2",1927,1927,"1927-02-28","motion",null,"passed","Supervisor Havenner moved that the Legislative Committee report on bridge legislation affecting the proposed bay bridge; so ordered.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",344,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n344",null,"Bridge Legislation. Supervisor Havenner moved that the Legislative Committee of the Board",null,null,"n","a",0,2.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:422/2",1927,1927,"1927-03-07","resolution",null,null,"Supervisor Havenner proposed forming a San Francisco and Alameda bridge district to finance and build a public bay bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",422,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n422",null,"Resolved, That the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco proceed forthwith to take",null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:422/3",1927,1927,"1927-03-07","resolution",null,"continued","Supervisor Roncovieri proposed an expert financial study of public versus private bay bridge options; item continued.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",422,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n422",null,"Whereas, financial problems connected with the building of a bridge across the Bay are various and",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:423/2",1927,1927,"1927-03-07","motion","transit","passed","The Board favours immediate private construction of the bay bridge, while the City Attorney prepares a public ownership vote.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",423,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n423",null,"I move you that while it is the policy of this Board that we favor",null,null,"n","a",0,8.15],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:461/1",1927,1927,"1927-03-14","resolution","transit",null,"Supervisor Havenner proposed forming a Bay bridge district with Alameda County for public ownership of a bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",461,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n461",null,"Resolved, That the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco proceed",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:462/3",1927,1927,"1927-03-14","motion","transit","passed","Supervisor Marks moved that the City Attorney submit a form for voters on public or private ownership of the proposed bay bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",462,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n462",null,"I move you that, as an amendment to the motion of Supervisor Gallagher, the City Attorney be requested",null,null,"n","a",0,3.4],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:498/2",1927,1927,"1927-03-21","resolution","transit",null,"Supervisor Havenner proposes forming a San Francisco and Alameda bridge district to build a publicly owned Bay bridge; outcome not printed.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",498,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n498",null,"Supervisor Havenner presented: \"Resolved, That the Board of Su- pervisors of the City and County of San Francisco proceed forthwith",null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:499/1",1927,1927,"1927-03-21","motion","transit","referred","Supervisor Havenner proposed forming a bridge district with Alameda County to finance and operate a public Bay bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",499,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n499",null,"Supervisor Havenner presented: \"Resolved, That the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco proceed forthwith",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:499/2",1927,1927,"1927-03-21","resolution","transit",null,"Supervisor Roncovieri proposed that the Bridge Committee hire financial accountants to compare public and private Bay bridge funding.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",499,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n499",null,"Supervisor Roncovieri presented: \"Whereas, financial problems connected with the building of a bridge across the Bay",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:499/4",1927,1927,"1927-03-21","resolution","transit",null,"Supervisor Shannon proposed the City Attorney start condemnation of Mission Rock to hold it as a public Bay bridge site.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",499,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n499",null,"Supervisor Shannon presented: \"Whereas, A. McLean Hawks, bridge and mining engineer, has called the attention of this Board",null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:499/5",1927,1927,"1927-03-21","motion","transit","continued","Supervisor Gallagher moved that the Board favour immediate private construction of the Bay bridge until voters decide ownership.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",499,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n499",null,"Supervisor Gallagher: I move you that while it is the policy of this Board that we favor a publicly-owned bay bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:545/1",1927,1927,"1927-03-28","appointment","transit",null,"Board of Public Works recommends appointing three engineers and $30,000 (≈ $580,931 in 2026 dollars) to study a San Francisco to Alameda Bay bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",545,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n545",null,"Transbay Bridge Engineers. Board of Supervisors: Under Resolution No. 26817 (New Series), adopted by you on February 14, 1927",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:550/1",1927,1927,"1927-03-28","resolution",null,null,"Supervisor Havenner proposed forming a bridge district with Alameda County to finance and operate a public Bay bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",550,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n550",null,"Resolved, That the Board of Su- pervisors of the City and County of San Francisco proceed forthwith",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:551/1",1927,1927,"1927-03-28","motion","transit",null,"Supervisor Gallagher moved that the Board favour immediate private construction of the bay bridge until voters decide public ownership.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",551,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n551",null,"I move you that while it is the policy of this Board that we favor a pub- licly-owned bay bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|813",1927,1927,"1927-04-04","resolution","civic-life","passed","Four university presidents thanked for naming engineers for the bay bridge","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",612,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n612",null,"Resolution No. 27088 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the sincere thanks of this Board be extended to the presidents of the University of California, Stanford University, Santa Clara University and St. Mary's University for their valued services in preparing a list of names of distinguished ",null,null,"n","a",0,2.53],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:835/3",1927,1927,"1927-05-09","motion","transit",null,"Gallagher proposed immediate private construction of the bay bridge while keeping public ownership as policy.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",835,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n835",null,"I move you that while it is the policy of this Board that",null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:980/1",1927,1927,"1927-05-23","motion",null,null,"Supervisor Shannon moved to adopt the engineers' report on the bay bridge location; the vote is not yet printed.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",980,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n980",null,"move that the report of the engineers, Messrs. Galloway, Ridgway and Talbot, be adopted",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:984/1",1927,1927,"1927-05-23","motion",null,"passed","The Board adopted engineers' report on a bay bridge and named engineers to present it in Washington.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",984,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n984",null,"I move that the report of the engineers, Messrs. Galloway, Ridgway and Talbot, be adopted",null,null,"n","a",0,4.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:1265/39",1927,1927,"1927-06-20","claim",null,null,"Claim of $7,500 (≈ $145,233 in 2026 dollars) paid to James B. McSheehy for committee expenses seeking approval of a San Francisco Bay bridge site.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1265,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1265",null,"James B. McSheehy, for expense of committee authorized and directed by the Board of Supervisors to appear before the Secretary of War",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:1271/3",1927,1927,"1927-06-20","hearing",null,"refused","The Construction Company of North America applied for a franchise for a bay bridge from Rincon Hill, set for hearing July 25, 1927.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1271,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1271",null,"Bridge Application Filed. The Construction Company of North America filed another application for franchise",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|1355",1927,1927,"1927-06-20","motion","running-the-city","rejected","Bay bridge from Rincon Hill to Alameda voted down","unverified","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1271,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1271",null,"Motion Lost. Whereupon, the roll being called on the adoption of the resolution, the same was lost by the following vote: Ayes — Supervisors Byington, Colman, Gallagher, Hayden, Powers, Roncovieri, Stanton — 7. Noes — Supervisors Badaracco, Kent, Shannon — 3. Absent — Supervisors Bath, Deasy, Harrel",null,null,"n","a",0,5.37],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:1379/2",1927,1927,"1927-07-18","resolution",null,"passed","Board adopted a resolution authorizing a telegram to President Coolidge urging War Department approval of the bay bridge site.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1379,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1379",null,"Supervisor Havenner, a member of the committee, moved that a committee consisting of Mayor Rolph",null,null,"n","a",0,3.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:1448/1",1927,1927,"1927-07-25","motion","transit","referred","Motion favouring private construction of a bay bridge until voters decide public ownership was continued to August 1, 1927.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1448,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1448",null,"Motion of Supervisor Gallagher: While it is the policy of this Board that we favor a publicly-owned bay bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,0.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:1456/2",1927,1927,"1927-07-25","communication",null,"continued","Board continued Roy C. Hackley's bay bridge application, filed June 27, 1927, until August 1.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1456,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1456",null,"Application of Roy C. Hackley for permission to construct a toll bridge across San Francisco Bay as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:1504/3",1927,1927,"1927-08-01","resolution","transit","continued","Havenner proposed a resolution urging public construction and ownership of highway bridges, including a Bay bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1504,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1504",null,"Bay Bridge. Supervisor Havenner presented: Resolution No. (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:1505/2",1927,1927,"1927-08-01","motion",null,"passed","City Attorney asked to submit a ballot form on public or private ownership of the proposed bay bridge; ordered.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1505,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1505",null,"Supervisor Marks: I desire to present the following motion and calling attention to the fact that it does",null,null,"n","a",0,3.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:1511/4",1927,1927,"1927-08-01","resolution",null,"continued","Further consideration of the Construction Company of North America's proposed bay bridge from Rincon Hill to Oakland was continued to August 8, 1927.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1511,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1511",null,"Application of Construction Company of North America to erect, maintain and operate and take tolls",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:1564/2",1927,1927,"1927-08-08","resolution",null,"passed","Resolution declares intent that the proposed trans-bay bridge be publicly financed, built and operated.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1564,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1564",null,"Bay Bridge. Supervisor Havenner presented : Resolution No. 27G49 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,8.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:1564/3",1927,1927,"1927-08-08","motion",null,null,"Gallagher moved a bridge hearings motion favouring a publicly owned bay bridge; outcome continues on next page.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1564,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1564",null,"BRIDGE HEARINGS. Motions. Supervisor Gallagher: I move you that Avhile it is the policy of this Board",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:1644/4",1927,1927,"1927-08-22","motion",null,"continued","Motions on public or private ownership of the proposed bay bridge were continued to Monday, September 19, 1927.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1644,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1644",null,"BRIDGE HEARINGS. Motions. Supervisor Gallagher: I move you that while it is the policy of this Board that we favor a publicly-owned bay bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:1862/2",1927,1927,"1927-09-19","motion",null,"continued","Supervisor Gallagher moved favoring private capital for building the bay bridge until voters decide public ownership.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1862,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1862",null,"Supervisor Gallagher: I move you that while it is the policy of this Board that we favor a publicly-owned bay bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:1869/3",1927,1927,"1927-09-19","resolution",null,"continued","Construction Company of North America's bay bridge application from Rincon Hill to Oakland was continued to September 26, 1927.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1869,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1869",null,"Application of Construction Company of North America to erect, maintain and operate and take tolls on",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:1869/4",1927,1927,"1927-09-19","communication",null,"continued","Roy C. Hackley's second bay bridge application from Fremont and Brannan streets to Alameda was continued to September 26, 1927.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1869,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1869",null,"Application of Roy C. Hackley for permission to construct a toll bridge across San Francisco Bay as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:1919/2",1927,1927,"1927-09-26","resolution",null,"continued","Edward A. Bertram's amended application for an alternative bay bridge line was continued to October 3, 1927.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1919,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1919",null,"Amended application of Edward A Bertram for alternative line of bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:1979/3",1927,1927,"1927-10-03","motion","transit","continued","Motion favouring immediate private construction of the bay bridge was continued to October 10, 1927.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1979,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1979",null,"Supervisor Gallagher: I move you that while it is the policy of this Board that we favor a publicly-owned bay bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,0.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:1980/1",1927,1927,"1927-10-03","motion",null,"continued","Board continued its debate on public versus private ownership of the proposed bay bridge until October 10, 1927.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1980,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1980",null,"Supervisor Gallagher: I move you that while it is the policy of this Board that we favor",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:1985/2",1927,1927,"1927-10-03","resolution","transit","continued","Edward A. Bertram's amended application for an alternative bay bridge line was continued to October 10, 1927.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1985,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1985",null,"Amended application of Edward A. Bertram for alternative line of bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:1986/2",1927,1927,"1927-10-03","resolution",null,"continued","Construction Company of North America's bay bridge franchise application was continued to October 10, 1927.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",1986,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n1986",null,"Application of Construction Company of North America to erect, maintain and operate and take tolls",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:2044/3",1927,1927,"1927-10-10","motion",null,"continued","Consideration of motions on public or private ownership of a San Francisco bay bridge was continued to October 17, 1927.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2044,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2044",null,"Supervisor Gallagher: I move you that while it is the policy of this Board",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:2050/3",1927,1927,"1927-10-10","resolution",null,"continued","Edward A. Bertram's amended alternative bay bridge application was continued to October 17, 1927.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2050,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2050",null,"Amended application of Edward A Bertram for alternative line of bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:2075/1",1927,1927,"1927-10-17","motion",null,"continued","Motions on public versus private ownership of a Bay bridge were postponed until October 24, 1927.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2075,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2075",null,"Supervisor Gallagher: I move you that while it is the policy of this Board that we favor a publicly-owned bay bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:2085/1",1927,1927,"1927-10-17","communication",null,null,"War Department letter says plans for a San Francisco Bay bridge north of the Hunters Point-Alameda line will not be approved.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2085,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2085",null,"Communication from War Department. Supervisor McSheehy presented: War Department, Washington.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:2088/1",1927,1927,"1927-10-17","motion",null,"passed","City Attorney was asked to draft a bay bridge bill for Congress, approved nine votes to one.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2088,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2088",null,"I would like to move at this time that the City Attorney be requested to prepare and submit to this Board",null,null,"n","a",0,5.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:2088/2",1927,1927,"1927-10-17","motion",null,"passed","Bridge Committee directed to study the Panama Pacific Exposition company's plan for financing a bay bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2088,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2088",null,"I would move that the Bridge Committee consider the plan followed by the organization of the Panama Pacific",null,null,"n","a",0,2.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:2088/3",1927,1927,"1927-10-17","motion",null,null,"Gallagher proposed a telegram asking the Secretary of War to explain his authority over a San Francisco bay bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2088,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2088",null,"I would move you, Mr. Mayor, that the following telegram be sent to the Secretary of War",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:2138/1",1927,1927,"1927-10-24","motion",null,"continued","Motions on bay bridge ownership, favouring private construction, were continued to October 31, 1927.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2138,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2138",null,"Supervisor Gallagher: I move you that while it is the policy of this Board",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:2190/1",1927,1927,"1927-10-31","resolution","transit",null,"Colonel Rand protested further Board consideration of H. S. Henion's bay bridge franchise application across the Oakland Estuary; the application remains pending.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2190,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2190",null,"Simply as a citizen and taxpayer, and not interested in the bridge proposition at all, I",null,null,"n","a",0,2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:2191/1",1927,1927,"1927-10-31","motion","transit","continued","Supervisor Gallagher moved that the Board favour immediate private construction of a publicly owned bay bridge; continued to November 21, 1927.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2191,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2191",null,"I move you that while it is the policy of this Board that we favor a pub licly-owned bay bridge, it is how- ever",null,null,"n","a",0,1.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:2220/1",1927,1927,"1927-11-07","other",null,"continued","Allan C. Rush's amended application for a trans-bay bridge from Rincon Hill to Goat Island was continued to November 21, 1927.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2220,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2220",null,"Amended Bridge Application, Allan C. Rush. The following matter was presented and read by the Clerk: Amended application of Allan C. Rush",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:2221/1",1927,1927,"1927-11-07","hearing",null,"continued","Hearing on a proposed Bay bridge from Rincon Hill to Goat Island was continued to November 21, 1927.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2221,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2221",null,"Filed by E. L. Vandair Nailen November 7, 1927, and continued for hearing until November 21, 1927, at 11 a.m.",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:2301/4",1927,1927,"1927-11-21","motion",null,"continued","Gallagher proposes immediate private construction of the bay bridge until voters choose public ownership; Marks offers an amendment.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2301,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2301",null,"I move you that while it is the policy of this Board that we favor a publicly-owned bay bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:2466/2",1927,1927,"1927-12-27","communication","transit","continued","Inter-Cities Bridge Company offered an alternative bay bridge design on Goat Island; the matter was continued to January 23, 1928.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2466,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2466",null,"Alternative Design, Bay Bridge. Communication, from Inter-Cities Bridge Company transmitting an alternative",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:106/1",1928,1928,"1928-01-16","other",null,null,"Federal Senate Bill 1762 would grant consent for San Francisco to build a bay bridge from Rincon Hill to Alameda County; referred to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",106,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n106",null,"Senate Bill 1762. In the Senate of the United States, December 15, 1927, Mr. Johnson introduced",null,null,"n","a",0,1.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:156/3",1928,1928,"1928-01-23","motion",null,null,"Supervisor Marks's motion asked the City Attorney to submit a public or private bay bridge ownership question to voters; ordered without objection.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",156,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n156",null,"BRIDGE HEARINGS. Motions. The following matters, laid over from the meeting of November 21, 1927, were taken up:",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:250/5",1928,1928,"1928-02-06","motion",null,"continued","Consideration of the bay bridge ownership motions was continued to April 2, 1928.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",250,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n250",null,"Supervisor Gallagher. I move you that while it is the policy of this Board that we favor a publicly-owned bay bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:257/3",1928,1928,"1928-02-06","communication",null,"continued","Roy C. Hackley's renewed application for a 19,400-foot bay bridge from Fremont and Brannan streets was continued to April 2, 1928.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",257,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n257",null,"Application of Roy C. Hackley for permission to construct a toll bridge across San Francisco Bay as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:260/3",1928,1928,"1928-02-06","resolution","transit","continued","Inter-Cities Bridge Company's alternative bay bridge route from Broadway to Oakland was continued to April 2, 1928.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",260,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n260",null,"Alternative design, Inter-Cities Bridge Company, for a bridge across San Francisco Bay, as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:310/1",1928,1928,"1928-02-20","motion",null,"passed","Board authorized a special committee of five to attend the Coyote Point Bay Bridge dedication in San Mateo County.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",310,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n310",null,"Whereupon, on motion of Supervisor McSheehy, the chair was authorized to appoint a special committee of five",null,null,"n","a",0,2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:332/1",1928,1928,"1928-02-20","resolution","transit","passed","Board adopted a resolution protesting Navy objections to a San Francisco Bay bridge after a ferry sinking.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",332,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n332",null,"Protest Against Military Objections to Bay Bridge, Bay Accident. Supervisor Havenner presented: Resolution No. 28546",null,null,"n","a",0,7.78],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:423/3",1928,1928,"1928-03-05","motion","transit",null,"Shannon proposed asking the State Engineer to help San Francisco obtain a centrally located Bay bridge franchise.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",423,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n423",null,"Supervisor Shannon moved that the State Engineer be communicated with, the information that Mr. Havenner is asking",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:423/4",1928,1928,"1928-03-05","motion","transit","passed","Gallagher's motion authorizing the Special Bridge and Public Utilities Committees to protect San Francisco's interest in the trans-bay bridge was carried.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",423,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n423",null,"Super^visor Gallagher moved that the Special Bridge Committee and the Public Utilities Committee, jointly, be authorized",null,null,"n","a",0,3.35],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:429/3",1928,1928,"1928-03-09","motion",null,"passed","The Board voted to hear all bay bridge franchise applications starting April 2, 1928, until every applicant has presented.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",429,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n429",null,"Supervisor Shannon moved that the hearings on the applications for a franchise to construct a bay bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:429/4",1928,1928,"1928-03-09","resolution",null,null,"Resolution No. 27754 declares that any trans-bay bridge should be publicly owned; Supervisor Havenner read it into the record.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",429,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n429",null,"Bay Bridge to Be Publicly Owned. The following resolution, heretofore adopted by the Board of Supervisors",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:432/3",1928,1928,"1928-03-12","resolution","water-sewers","passed","City Attorney John J. O'Toole authorised to travel to Washington for congressional hearings on the San Francisco Bay Bridge bills.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",432,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n432",null,"City Attorney to Participate in Bridge Hearings Before Congress.",null,null,"n","a",0,3.49],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:614/2",1928,1928,"1928-04-02","resolution",null,"passed","Board commended Senator Hiram W. Johnson for helping win federal support for a San Francisco Bay bridge.","unverified","journalofproceed23sanfrich",614,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n614",null,"Commendation for Bridge Advocates. Supervisor Havenner presented: Resolution No. 28792 (New Series)",null,null,"n","a",0,2.45],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:614/3",1928,1928,"1928-04-02","resolution",null,null,"Board proposed commending Representative Richard J. Welch for helping win federal support for a San Francisco Bay bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",614,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n614",null,"Resolution No. 28793 (New Series), as follows: Whereas, the Honorable Richard J. Welch, Representative in Con-",null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:615/2",1928,1928,"1928-04-02","resolution",null,"passed","Board commends Mayor James Rolph Jr. for his efforts to win congressional legislation for a San Francisco bay bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",615,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n615",null,"Whereas, the Honorable James Rolph, Jr., Mayor of the City and County of San Francisco, devoted a great deal of his time",null,null,"n","a",0,2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:617/2",1928,1928,"1928-04-02","motion",null,"continued","Motions on public or private ownership of a proposed bay bridge were continued to April 16, 1928 at 2 p.m.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",617,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n617",null,"I move you that while it is the policy of this Board that we favor a publicly-owned bay bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich|958",1928,1928,"1928-04-02","resolution","the-street","passed","McSheehy, O'Toole and O'Shaughnessy praised for their Bay bridge work","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",615,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n615",null,"Resolution No. 28795 (New Series), as follows: Whereas, Supervisor James B. McSheehy, chairman of the Special Bridge Committee, City Attorney John J. O'Toole and City Engineer M, M. O'Shaughnessy devoted a great deal of time and effort to facilitate the work in presenting to the Commerce Committee o",null,null,"n","a",0,3.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:636/1",1928,1928,"1928-04-09","resolution",null,"passed","Board commends Matt I. Sullivan for helping win congressional support for a San Francisco Bay bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",636,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n636",null,"Whereas, the Honorable Matt I. Sullivan, of the City and County of San Francisco, devoted a great deal of his time",null,null,"n","a",0,-0.7],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:725/6",1928,1928,"1928-04-16","motion",null,"passed","Motion to telegraph Supervisor McSheehy about a Bay Bridge tube compromise carried with an amendment; text continues.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",725,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n725",null,"Relative to Supervisor McSheehy's Alleged \"Tube Compromise\" for Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:731/1",1928,1928,"1928-04-16","motion","transit","continued","Motion on public versus private ownership of the proposed Bay bridge was continued to May 14, 1928.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",731,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n731",null,"Supervisor Gallagher: I move you that while it is the policy of this Board that we favor a publicly-owned bay bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:741/2",1928,1928,"1928-04-16","resolution",null,"continued","Inter-Cities Bridge Company's alternative bay bridge design from Broadway to Oakland was continued to May 14, 1928.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",741,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n741",null,"Alternative design, Inter-Cities Bridge Company, for a bridge across San Francisco Bay, as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:747/2",1928,1928,"1928-04-23","resolution",null,"referred","Resolution condemning Supervisor McSheehy's tube compromise for a bay bridge was referred to the Mayor and Special Bridge Committee.","unverified","journalofproceed23sanfrich",747,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n747",null,"A resolution by Supervisor Shannon and a substitute therefor offered by Supervisor Havenner condemnatory of Supervisor McSheehy",null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:859/3",1928,1928,"1928-05-14","motion",null,"continued","Motions on public or private ownership of the proposed bay bridge were continued to May 28, 1928.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",859,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n859",null,"Supervisor Gallagher: I move you that while it is the policy of this Board that we favor a publicly- owned bay bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:866/4",1928,1928,"1928-05-14","communication",null,"continued","Roy Hackley's second bay bridge application, filed June 1927, was continued to May 28, 1928.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",866,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n866",null,"Application of Roy C. Hackley for permission to construct a toll bridge across San Francisco Bay",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:869/3",1928,1928,"1928-05-14","resolution",null,"continued","Inter-Cities Bridge Company's alternative bay bridge route from Broadway to Goat Island was continued to May 28, 1928.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",869,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n869",null,"Alternative design, Inter-Cities Bridge Company, for a bridge across San Francisco Bay, as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:979/32",1928,1928,"1928-05-25","other","transit",null,"Appropriation of $100,000 (≈ $2.0 million in 2026 dollars) for Bay Bridge investigations, conditional on a federal permit, proposed, outcome not shown here.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",979,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n979",null,"Bay Bridge Investigations; provided that no part of this item shall be expended",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:1133/2",1928,1928,"1928-05-28","resolution",null,"passed","Invitation proposed to the House Interstate and Foreign Commerce Committee to visit San Francisco and inspect the bay bridge problem.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",1133,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n1133",null,"Invitation to Interstate and Foreign Commerce* Committee to Visit San Francisco. Supervisor Havenner presented: Resolution No. 29066",null,null,"n","a",0,2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:1151/2",1928,1928,"1928-06-04","other",null,"referred","City Attorney O'Toole's letter on a congressional inspection of the Bay Bridge project was referred to Supervisor Havenner.","unverified","journalofproceed23sanfrich",1151,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n1151",null,"Relative to Inspection of San Francisco Bay Bridge Project by Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:1236/1",1928,1928,"1928-06-11","other",null,null,"Supervisor McSheehy's report on a proposed San Francisco Bay bridge plan, continued from May 21, is debated; no decision shown here.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",1236,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n1236",null,"I notice that your report is continued until this date. Are you making the",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:1385/1",1928,1928,"1928-06-25","other",null,null,"Congressman Welch urged denying pending private bay bridge applications to show San Francisco backs a public bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",1385,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n1385",null,"the proponents of privately owned bridges have fought our public enterprise, here and in Washington, all winter",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:1484/1",1928,1928,"1928-07-09","resolution","whats-being-built",null,"H. S. Henion's pending bay bridge franchise application was assigned to Montgomery K. Miller, who will take the franchise.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",1484,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n1484",null,"on the 14th day of March, 1927, and is now pending before that Board",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:1490/1",1928,1928,"1928-07-09","motion","transit","continued","Motions on public or private ownership of a proposed bay bridge were continued to July 31, 1928.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",1490,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n1490",null,"BRIDGE HEARINGS. Motions. The following motions were taken up and, on motion, continued until July 31, 1928",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:1499/3",1928,1928,"1928-07-09","resolution",null,"continued","Edward A. Bertram's amended application for an alternative bay bridge line was continued to July 31, 1928.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",1499,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n1499",null,"Amended application of Edward A. Bertram for alternative line of bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:1505/3",1928,1928,"1928-07-09","resolution",null,"continued","Inter-Cities Bridge Company proposed an alternative bay bridge route from Broadway to Oakland via Goat Island.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",1505,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n1505",null,"Alternative design, Inter-Cities Bridge Company, for a bridge across San Francisco Bay, as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:1656/1",1928,1928,"1928-07-31","resolution",null,"passed","Bay bridge franchise application by The Construction Company of North America was denied for a route between San Francisco and Alameda County.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",1656,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n1656",null,"Supervisor McSheehp moved that the amended application of The Construction Company of North America",null,null,"n","a",0,4.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:1719/1",1928,1928,"1928-08-13","motion","transit","continued","Supervisor Marks proposed a committee of Board members, the Mayor and engineers to handle the Bay bridge matters.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",1719,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n1719",null,"Supervisor Marks moved that the bridge matters be placed in the hands of a committee",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:2467/3",1928,1928,"1928-10-29","resolution",null,"referred","Shannon's resolution proposes a committee to urge Congress to pass the Johnson-Welch bay bridge bill.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",2467,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n2467",null,"Johnson- Welch Bridge Bill. Supervisor Shannon presented: Resolution No. (New Series)",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:2652/4",1928,1928,"1928-11-26","resolution",null,null,"Resolution 30032 on transferring the Bay Bridge franchise to the State of California was presented; its outcome continues on the next page.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",2652,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n2652",null,"Amendment to Permit Transfer of Bay Bridge Franchise to State of California. Supervisor Havenner presented:",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:13/1",1947,1929,"1929","alternative","study or report",null,"Hoover-Young San Francisco Bay Bridge Commission · alternative: five possible locations for a crossing considered; general location of present high-level bridge recommended","unverified","C124921430",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n12",null,"It gave principal consideration to five possible locations for a crossing, and finally recommended the general location where the present high-level bridge is situated.','subject':'x'}]}?OK, correction below.<br>Ignore that; the quote above is invalid. Correct output:{",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:46/2",1929,1929,"1929-01-07","motion","transit","passed","Board telegraphed Congressman Welch urging action on the Bay Bridge bill linking Rincon Hill and Alameda.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",46,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n46",null,"Relative to Appointment of Delegation to Go to Washington on Bay Bridge Bill.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.78],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:55/1",1929,1929,"1929-01-14","resolution","transit",null,"Resolution proposed to send a committee to Washington to urge passage of the Johnson-Welch bill for a publicly owned Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",55,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n55",null,"Johnson-Welch Bridge Bill. Resolution No. (New Series), as follows: Whereas, all applications for franchises to",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich|412",1929,1929,"1929-02-18","ordinance","the-street","passed","Mayor to name a citizens' committee for the bay bridge","unverified","journalofproceed24sanfrich",349,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n349",null,"Ordinance No. 8276 (New Series) : 135 Stockton street, existing length, 72 feet; new length, none — Butler Building; Nathan-Dohrmann Co. Mayor to Appoint an Advisory Committee of Citizens to Work for the Proposed Bay Bridge. Supervisor Havenner moved that his Honor the Mayor appoint an advisory comm",null,null,"n","a",0,4.98],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:569/3",1929,1929,"1929-03-18","ordinance",null,null,"Board took no action on State Senate Bill 702, which would repeal the 1881 law on bay bridge franchises.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",569,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n569",null,"Senate Bill No. 702. Introduced by Senator Fellom. Repeals the Act of March 14, 1881, relative to granting of franchises for bay bridges",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:580/1",1929,1929,"1929-03-25","other","whats-being-built","continued","Communication urging a bay bridge franchise hearing for J. P. O'Connell was laid over one week.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",580,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n580",null,"Relative to J. P. O'Connell Applications for Bay Bridge Franchise.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:1075/2",1929,1929,"1929-05-20","motion",null,"passed","Supervisor Havenner's motion to seek cooperation on the Bay Bridge application in Washington carried after the state enacted a toll bridge bill.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",1075,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n1075",null,"Revenue Bond Bill Approved.",null,null,"n","a",0,3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:1117/3",1929,1929,"1929-05-23","resolution",null,"referred","Supervisor Schmidt moved a $100,000 (≈ $2.0 million in 2026 dollars) transfer from Bay Bridge Investigations to a Central Warehouse Construction Fund.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",1117,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n1117",null,"Central Warehouse. Supervisor Schmidt presented and moved its approval: Resolution No. (New Series)",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:1118/4",1929,1929,"1929-05-23","hearing",null,"passed","The City Attorney was directed to appeal Judge Goodell's ruling, giving bay bridge applicant J. O'Connell a hearing.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",1118,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n1118",null,"City Attorney to Take Appeal — Hearing of O'Connell Bridge Application.",null,null,"n","a",0,5.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:1266/2",1929,1929,"1929-06-10","resolution","whats-being-built","refused","Board refused to reinstate a hearing on J. P. O'Connell's bay bridge application from Rincon Hill to Alameda.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",1266,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n1266",null,"Whereas, the City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco did, on the 23d day of May, 1929",null,null,"n","a",0,5.69],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:1724/2",1929,1929,"1929-08-19","resolution",null,"passed","Board endorses President Hoover's proposed commission to study a San Francisco Bay bridge and pledges cooperation.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",1724,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n1724",null,"Approval of President Hoover's Proposed Commission to Consider Proposed San Francisco-Alameda Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,3.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed25part2sanfrich:963/1",1930,1930,"1930-08-04","motion",null,"passed","The Board endorsed the Hoover-Young Bay Bridge Commission's work and urged early action on a permit.","quoted","journalofproceed25part2sanfrich",963,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed25part2sanfrich/page/n960",null,"Approval of Hoover-Young Bay Bridge Commission Report.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26sanfrich:200/2",1931,1931,null,"motion",null,"passed","Mayor to appoint a supervisors' committee to meet federal officials about the proposed San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed26sanfrich",200,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26sanfrich/page/n191",null,"Supervisor Havenner moved that the Mayor be authorized to appoint a committee of the Board",null,null,"n","a",0,3.12],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878417:97/1",1956,1931,"1931","project","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: Federal statute of 1931, amended 1953, sets the bridge as running from Rincon Hill district in San Francisco via Goat Island to Oakland","unverified","C124878417",97,"https://archive.org/details/C124878417/page/n96",null,null,null,"Organizational and financial aspects of the proposed San Francisco Bay Area rapid transit system","n","m",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878417:97/10002",1956,1931,"1931","event","study or report",null,"Federal statute for San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · event: Passed in 1931; amended in 1953","unverified","C124878417",97,"https://archive.org/details/C124878417/page/n96",null,null,null,"Organizational and financial aspects of the proposed San Francisco Bay Area rapid transit system","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878417:97/2",1956,1931,"1931","project","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: Bridge tolls must be used for operation, maintenance and repair of the present bridge and retirement of its indebtedness, under federal statute","unverified","C124878417",97,"https://archive.org/details/C124878417/page/n96",null,null,null,"Organizational and financial aspects of the proposed San Francisco Bay Area rapid transit system","n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26sanfrich:327/1",1931,1931,"1931-02-09","motion",null,null,"Supervisor Havenner moved that the City Engineer urge Congress to back a bay bridge sinking fund change.","quoted","journalofproceed26sanfrich",327,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26sanfrich/page/n318",null,"Supervisor Havenner moved that City Engineer wire representatives in Congress an expression of sympathy",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich:397/2",1931,1931,"1931-08-10","motion",null,"passed","Gallagher moved that the Mayor convene interested parties on the Bay Bridge routes through the South of Market district.","quoted","journalofproceed26part2sanfrich",397,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich/page/n380",null,"S. F. Bridgehead Problems. Supervisor Gallagher moved that when the location of the bridgehead of the San Francisco Bay Bridge is determined",null,null,"n","a",0,3.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich:917/2",1931,1931,"1931-11-16","communication",null,"referred","The Redwood Empire Association's invitation to the Richardson's Bay bridge dedication was accepted, and the Mayor will appoint a committee.","quoted","journalofproceed26part2sanfrich",917,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich/page/n894",null,"Communication from Redwood Empire Association, requesting the adoption of a resolution by the Board of Supervisors authorizing each member",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed27sanfrich:1002/3",1932,1932,"1932-05-23","resolution",null,null,"Supervisor Canepa moved a resolution asking Congress to pass bills funding Bay Bridge construction through the Reconstruction Finance Corporation.","quoted","journalofproceed27sanfrich",1002,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed27sanfrich/page/n1002",null,"Congress Memorialized to Pass Bills Providing Funds of Federal Reconstruction Finance Corporation for Construction of Bay",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed27sanfrich:1474/2",1932,1932,"1932-08-01","motion",null,"passed","Supervisor Havenner moved that the Mayor appoint a committee to deal with State and Federal engineers on Bay Bridge approaches.","quoted","journalofproceed27sanfrich",1474,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed27sanfrich/page/n1474",null,"Mayor to Appoint Committee to Deal With State and Federal Engineers Relative to Bay Bridge Approaches.",null,null,"n","a",0,3.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed27sanfrich:1755/2",1932,1932,"1932-10-10","motion",null,"passed","Havenner moved that the Mayor appoint a citizens committee to honour the Bay Bridge Commission's work; motion carried.","quoted","journalofproceed27sanfrich",1755,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed27sanfrich/page/n1755",null,"Transbay Bridge. Supervisor Havenner: In recognition of the announcement of the approval by the Reconstruction Finance Corporation of the loan",null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed27sanfrich:1755/3",1932,1932,"1932-10-10","resolution",null,null,"Supervisor Gallagher presented a resolution thanking the Bay Bridge financing committee for securing the Reconstruction Finance Corporation bond purchase.","quoted","journalofproceed27sanfrich",1755,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed27sanfrich/page/n1755",null,"Resolution of Thanks to Committee on San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. (Code No. 12.112) Supervisor Gallagher presented: Resolution No. 468",null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich|9",1933,1933,"1933-01-09","resolution","getting-around","passed","Copy sought of the loan agreement financing the Bay Bridge","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",53,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n53",null,"Resolution No. 580, as follows: Resolved, That the California Highway Commission be requested to forward to this Board of Supervisors a certified copy of the agreement entered into between the Reconstruction Finance Corporation and the California Highway Commission for the financing of the San Franc",null,null,"n","a",0,2.22],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich:98/1",1933,1933,"1933-01-23","resolution",null,"passed","Board urges the State Legislature to pass Bay Bridge bills before February 1 to secure a $62,000,000 (≈ $1.6 billion in 2026 dollars) loan.","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",98,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n98",null,"Favorable Action by Legislature on San Francisco Bay Bridge Bills Urged.",null,null,"n","a",0,6.36],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich:119/3",1933,1933,"1933-01-30","resolution",null,null,"Resolution asks the Mayor to appoint a committee for ground-breaking ceremonies on the Bay Bridge, a project of about $67 million (≈ $1.7 billion in 2026 dollars).","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",119,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n119",null,"Mayor Requested to Appoint Committee, Ground-Breaking Ceremonies, San Francisco-Alameda County Bay Bridge. (Code No. 12.112) Supervisor Peyser presented: Resolution No. 620",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich:120/4",1933,1933,"1933-01-30","resolution",null,"passed","Board commends business, labor and civic leaders for securing state legislation enabling the Bay Bridge; resolution adopted.","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",120,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n120",null,"Commending Commercial, Business and Labor Organizations and Citizens Re Enactment of Legislation Relating to Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,-0.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich:121/1",1933,1933,"1933-01-30","resolution",null,"amended","Names of the Governor and State Toll Bridge Authority members to be added to the Bay Bridge commendation resolution; amended, the matter later adopted","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",121,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n121",null,"Commending Commercial, Business and Labor Organizations and Citizens Re Enactment of Legislation Relating to Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich:232/3",1933,1933,"1933-02-20","resolution","transit","passed","The Board asked state and bridge engineers to study traffic links between the Bay Bridge and a proposed Yerba Buena airport.","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",232,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n232",null,"Requesting State Director of Public Works and Chief Engineer to Take Official Cognizance of the Airport Site at Yerba Buena Shoal",null,null,"n","a",0,2.78],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich:430/2",1933,1933,"1933-03-20","hearing","whats-being-built",null,"The Board recessed to hold a hearing next day on plans for the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge approaches and terminal.","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",430,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n430",null,"Hearing on Approval of Plans, Etc. — San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. Supervisor Havenner declared that the special committee appointed by the Mayor",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich|98",1933,1933,"1933-03-21","resolution","civic-life","passed","Map of state highways to Bay Bridge approved","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",434,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n434",null,"Resolution No. 693, as follows: Approving a map showing route of proposed State Highways in the City and County of San Francisco connecting with the San Francisco- Oakland Bay Bridge, and the construction of such proposed State Highways by the State of California; and directing that a copy of map sh",null,null,"n","a",0,2.64],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich:548/3",1933,1933,"1933-04-03","resolution",null,"passed","The Board adopted a resolution asking the Mayor to arrange a citizens' committee to commemorate the Bay Bridge groundbreaking ceremonies.","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",548,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n548",null,"Citizens' Committee, Commemorative Ceremonies, San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. (Code No. 12.112) Supervisor Hayden presented: Resolution No. 713",null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich:672/2",1933,1933,"1933-04-17","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Proposed ordinance adding traffic checker positions as needed for Bay Bridge approach traffic surveys was passed for second reading.","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",672,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n672",null,"Amending the Annual Salary Ordinance to Designate Classification, Traffic Checkers, to Be Used as Needed, in Connection",null,null,"n","a",0,2.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich:674/1",1933,1933,"1933-04-17","ordinance",null,"passed","Salary schedule amended to add a Traffic Checker classification for Bay Bridge approach surveys, adopted.","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",674,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n674",null,"Section 43. DE Quantity Item of Class No. Positions No.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich:732/2",1933,1933,"1933-04-24","resolution",null,null,"The Finance Committee presented a proposed resolution to fund the city's purchase of $650,000 (≈ $16.8 million in 2026 dollars) in Trans-Bay Bridge bonds, to be paid from the gas tax.","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",732,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n732",null,"Relative to Budget Appropriation for Purchase of Bay Bridge Bonds. The following was presented by the Finance Committee and read by the Clerk.",null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich:733/1",1933,1933,"1933-04-24","resolution",null,"passed","Resolution urges a budget provision of $390,000 (≈ $10.1 million in 2026 dollars) to buy Bay Bridge revenue bonds over four years.","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",733,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n733",null,"Recommending to Mayor That Provision Be Made in Budget for Purchase of Bay Bridge Bonds,",null,null,"n","a",0,4.23],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich:734/1",1933,1933,"1933-04-24","resolution",null,"passed","Board adopted a resolution to buy $390,000 (≈ $10.1 million in 2026 dollars) of Bay Bridge toll revenue bonds from city banks, 14 ayes, 1 absent.","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",734,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n734",null,"Whereas, a group of the banks in the City and County of San Francisco are ready and willing to bid for and purchase said first block of bonds",null,null,"n","a",0,4.23],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich:735/1",1933,1933,"1933-04-24","resolution",null,"referred","Board referred the Bay Bridge bond repurchase question to the Retirement Board, expecting Retirement Fund purchase.","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",735,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n735",null,"In Re Bay Bridge Bonds. SUPERVISOR GALLAGHER: Just a moment. I want to make a motion",null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich:846/2",1933,1933,"1933-05-01","ordinance",null,"passed","Annual Salary Ordinance amended to add traffic checker positions for Bay Bridge approach surveys, passed finally.","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",846,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n846",null,"Amending the Annual Salary Ordinance to Designate Classification, Traffic Checkers, to Be Used",null,null,"n","a",0,2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich:848/1",1933,1933,"1933-05-01","ordinance",null,"passed","Salary schedule amended to add a Traffic Checker classification for Bay Bridge approach traffic surveys, adopted by the Board.","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",848,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n848",null,"Explanatory. Item 64 is added to designate a classification for Traffic Checkers, to be used as needed",null,null,"n","a",0,3.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich:1031/3",1933,1933,"1933-05-24","other",null,"amended","Budget line 35 to be corrected to read San Francisco Oakland Bay Bridge Approaches instead of Golden Gate Bridge Approaches; amended, no final vote found","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",1031,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n1031",null,"Correct Line 35, Golden Gate Bridge Approaches, to read: San Francisco Oakland Bay Bridge Approaches.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich:1031/4",1933,1933,"1933-05-24","resolution",null,null,"Resolution 751 proposes appropriating money with State and Federal governments for Bay Bridge preliminary work, seeking Reconstruction Finance Corporation aid.","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",1031,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n1031",null,"Supervisor Miles thereupon presented Resolution No. 751, which was read by the Clerk, wherein the Board of Supervisors agreed",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich|383",1933,1933,"1933-08-21","resolution","doing-business","passed","Healy-Tibbitts allowed spur tracks on Bryant Street for the Bay Bridge","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",1639,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n1639",null,"Resolution No. 969, as follows: Resolved, That Healy-Tibbitts Construction Company be and is hereby granted permission, revocable at will of the Board of Supervisors, to construct and maintain temporary spur tracks from the Southern Pacific track on Bryant street between Fremont and First streets, a",null,null,"n","a",0,1.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed28sanfrich:2237/2",1933,1933,"1933-12-18","motion","transit","passed","Board carried a motion asking the Toll Bridge Authority for a report on Bay Bridge transit conferences.","quoted","journalofproceed28sanfrich",2237,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed28sanfrich/page/n2237",null,"Conferences on Bay Bridge Terminals. Supervisor Gallagher moved that the Clerk of the Board immediately communicate",null,null,"n","a",0,2.28],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:1782/3",1934,1934,null,"motion","transit","continued","Supervisor Uhl proposed registering the Board's opposition to Plan X for the Bay Bridge; the matter was put off to Friday.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",1782,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n1782",null,"Supervisor Uhl moved that the Board of Supervisors register with the Toll Bridge Authority, the RFC and the Governor of California its opposition",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:105/2",1934,1934,"1934-01-15","communication",null,"referred","The Public Works Department replied on Bay Bridge approach changes; the communication was referred to the Streets Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",105,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n105",null,"Hearings Relative to Approaches to San Francisco Bay Bridge Supervisor Gallagher presented Communication from C. H. Purcell, Chief Engineer",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:163/2",1934,1934,"1934-01-29","other",null,"referred","Art Commission objected to Bay Bridge approaches near Fifth and Harrison streets; report referred to Streets and Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",163,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n163",null,"Report of Art Commission on Approaches to San Francisco Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:229/1",1934,1934,"1934-02-13","resolution",null,"continued","Board postponed action one week on the Bay bridge approach resolution and property purchase for the new alignment.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",229,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n229",null,"Privilege of the Floor.",null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:241/2",1934,1934,"1934-02-13","resolution",null,"passed","Chief Administrative Officer was ordered to study storing city-owned automobiles under the Bay Bridge approaches and report back.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",241,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n241",null,"Chief Administrative Officer to Make Study and Report Thereon on Feasibility of Using Approaches of San Francisco Bay Bridge for Storing City-Owned Automobiles.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich|47",1934,1934,"1934-02-13","resolution","getting-around",null,"Art Commission asks that the Bay Bridge ramp be moved","unverified","journalofproceed29sanfrich",227,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n227",null,"Resolution No. 1291, as follows: Whereas, the California Toll Bridge Authority, under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California, has undertaken the construction of a bridge across the Bay of San Francisco from the County of Alameda to the City and County of San Francisco; and Whereas, the",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceed29sanfrich/227/12fcf0ed",1934,1934,"1934-02-13","resolution",null,"passed","Art Commission asks that the Bay Bridge ramp be moved","unverified","journalofproceed29sanfrich",227,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n227",null,"Requesting Bay Bridge Authorities to Change Location of Westerly Terminal as Recommended by the Art Commission.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:255/2",1934,1934,"1934-02-19","resolution",null,"passed","The Board considered a resolution asking the Bay Bridge authorities to move the westerly terminal at Fifth Street as the Art Commission recommended.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",255,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n255",null,"Requesting Bay Bridge Authorities to Change Location of Westerly Terminal as Recommended by the Art Commission.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich|58",1934,1934,"1934-02-19","resolution","getting-around",null,"Art Commission asks that the Bay Bridge ramp be moved","unverified","journalofproceed29sanfrich",255,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n255",null,"Resolution No. 1291, as follows: Whereas, the California Toll Bridge Authority, under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California, has undertaken the construction of a bridge across the Bay of San Francisco from the County of Alameda to the City and County of San Francisco; and Whereas, the",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceed29sanfrich/255/12fcf0ed",1934,1934,"1934-02-19","resolution",null,"passed","Art Commission asks that the Bay Bridge ramp be moved","unverified","journalofproceed29sanfrich",255,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n255",null,"Requesting Bay Bridge Authorities to Change Location of Westerly Terminal as Recommended by the Art Commission.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:1422/2",1934,1934,"1934-09-11","motion","transit","passed","Supervisor Gallagher moved that the Mayor and Public Utilities Commission report on protecting San Francisco's interest in a Bay Bridge interurban terminal.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",1422,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n1422",null,"Interurban Terminal. Supervisor Gallagher read news item and editorial from the San Francisco News",null,null,"n","a",0,3.65],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:1455/2",1934,1934,"1934-09-17","resolution",null,"referred","Supervisor Uhl proposed a special Board meeting on San Francisco Bay Bridge terminals; the resolution was referred to the Public Utilities Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",1455,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n1455",null,"Special Meeting of Toll Bridge Authority Re Terminals. (Code No. 12.112) Supervisor Uhl presented: Resolution No. 1578",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:1456/5",1934,1934,"1934-09-17","communication","transit","referred","Mayor's communication on the Bay Bridge interurban terminal and a rapid transit system was referred to the Public Utilities Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",1456,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n1456",null,"Interurban Terminal and Rapid Transit. The following was presented and read by the Clerk: Communication from Mayor",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:1615/2",1934,1934,"1934-10-29","resolution","transit","referred","Public Utilities Commission asked to plan a rapid transit street railway linked to the Municipal Railway and Bay Bridge; referred to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",1615,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n1615",null,"Rapid Transit, San Francisco. Supervisor Colman presented: Resolution No. 1642, as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:1679/2",1934,1934,"1934-11-26","motion","transit","withdrawn","Supervisor Uhl's motion to block a monopoly over Bay Bridge interurban train franchises was withdrawn.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",1679,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n1679",null,"The following motion made by Supervisor Uhl in Committee of the Whole, Thursday evening,",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:1701/3",1934,1934,"1934-11-26","motion","transit","passed","Supervisor Colman's motion authorising the City Attorney to act for San Francisco on Bay Bridge transportation franchise applications was carried.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",1701,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n1701",null,"Re Applications for Franchises for Transportation Over Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,3.53],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:1716/2",1934,1934,"1934-12-03","other","transit","referred","Southern Pacific and Key Route proposed electric trains over the Bay Bridge; the matter was referred to the Public Utilities Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",1716,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n1716",null,"Bridge Terminals and Rapid Transit in San Francisco.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:1734/1",1934,1934,"1934-12-10","other","transit",null,"Bay Bridge Authority seeks a fifteen million dollar RFC loan; telegrams spread in the Journal, no decision taken.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",1734,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n1734",null,"Telegrams. The following were presented, read and ordered spread in the Journal",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:1735/1",1934,1934,"1934-12-10","motion","transit","passed","Supervisors Gallagher and Shannon moved objections to exclusive rights and rental terms in the Bay Bridge railroad agreement.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",1735,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n1735",null,"Supervisor Gallagher, seconded by Supervisor Shannon, moved that objections be made to the proper parties as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,3.03],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:1735/2",1934,1934,"1934-12-10","motion","transit","passed","Supervisor Gallagher moved that the Clerk write federal and state officials urging more time for the Bay Bridge loan.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",1735,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n1735",null,"SUPERVISOR GALLAGHER: I move you that the Clerk of this Board address or wire a letter as might be proper",null,null,"n","a",0,6.76],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:1736/1",1934,1934,"1934-12-10","ordinance","transit","passed","The Board finally passed a $25,000 (≈ $628,619 in 2026 dollars) appropriation for the Public Utilities Commission to study Bay Bridge terminal and rapid transit facilities.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",1736,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n1736",null,"Appropriation of $25,000 From Municipal Railway Operative Fund for Bridge Terminals and Rapid Transit Investigation.",null,null,"n","a",0,3.9],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:1786/2",1934,1934,"1934-12-21","resolution","transit","passed","Board adopted a resolution asking the State Railroad Commission for bay bridge rapid transit cost information.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",1786,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n1786",null,"State Railroad Commission Requested to Furnish Information Re Rapid Transit, Bay Bridge. (Code No. 12.112) Resolution No. 1713",null,null,"n","a",0,2.78],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed29sanfrich:1801/1",1934,1934,"1934-12-31","resolution","transit",null,"Supervisor Uhl moved Resolution No. 1678 on the Bay Bridge franchise tax and the City Attorney representing supervisors before the Toll Bridge Authority.","quoted","journalofproceed29sanfrich",1801,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed29sanfrich/page/n1801",null,"Franchise Tax, Bay Bridge; City Attorney to Represent Supervisors Before Railroad Commission or Toll Bridge Authority.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:12/1",1935,1935,"1935-01-02","motion","transit",null,"Supervisor Uhl proposed asking the state to study bus service on the Trans-Bay Bridge and reconsider the RFC resolution.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",12,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n11",null,"Supervisor Uhl's Substitute Motion. Supervisor Uhl offered the following substitute for his motion previously made",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:13/1",1935,1935,"1935-01-02","motion","transit",null,"Supervisor Uhl proposed asking the state to study bus transportation on the Trans-Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",13,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n12",null,"Supervisor Uhl offered the following substitute for his motion previously made, to-wit:",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:15/1",1935,1935,"1935-01-02","resolution","transit",null,"Havenner proposed a resolution asking the Toll Bridge Authority to accept a $10,000,000 (≈ $245.9 million in 2026 dollars) loan option and study Bay Bridge bus service.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",15,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n14",null,"Transportation Over Bay Bridge. (Code No. 15.092) Resolution No. 1720, as follows: Resolved, That the Board of Supervisors",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:16/1",1935,1935,"1935-01-02","resolution","transit","passed","San Francisco urges the state Toll Bridge Authority to accept a $10,000,000 (≈ $245.9 million in 2026 dollars) loan option from the Reconstruction Finance Corporation for the Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",16,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n15",null,"Resolved, That the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco recommends the adoption by",null,null,"n","a",0,6.11],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:44/1",1935,1935,"1935-01-07","motion","transit","passed","Supervisor Uhl moved that the City Attorney report on whether interurban trains crossing the Bay Bridge need a franchise.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",44,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n43",null,"Request for City Attorney's Opinion as to Necessity of Bay Bridge Franchise.",null,null,"n","a",0,3.2],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:106/2",1935,1935,"1935-01-14","motion","transit","passed","Board asked the City Attorney to push for state law letting the Toll Bridge Authority run transit across the Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",106,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n105",null,"Proposed That State Toll Bridge Authority Be Empowered to Acquire, Own and Operate",null,null,"n","a",0,6.03],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:127/2",1935,1935,"1935-01-21","motion","transit",null,"Supervisor Havenner moved that the City Attorney press the conference of city attorneys on Bay Bridge transportation, including State Toll Bridge Authority control.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",127,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n126",null,"Proposed That State Toll Bridge Authority Be Empowered to Acquire, Own and Operate Transportation System Over Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:171/2",1935,1935,"1935-02-04","other",null,"referred","A memo on cancelling taxes for property bought for parks, schools and the Trans-Bay Bridge was referred to Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",171,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n170",null,"Cancellation of Property. The following was presented and read by the Clerk:",null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:223/2",1935,1935,"1935-02-25","motion","transit","passed","Board asked the Public Utilities Commission to change its Monday meeting so Manager Cahill could attend Bay Bridge transportation hearings.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",223,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n222",null,"Supervisor Uhl, on the Board of Supervisors being advised that Mr. Cahill, Manager of the Public Utilities Commission",null,null,"n","a",0,5.28],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:224/1",1935,1935,"1935-02-25","hearing","transit","continued","Consideration of the Public Utilities Commission report on bus and rail transport across the Bay Bridge was put off to March 4, 1935.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",224,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n223",null,"Action Deferred. Whereupon, on motion of Supervisor Uhl, the foregoing matter was laid over until Monday, March 4, 1935",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:234/2",1935,1935,"1935-03-04","other","transit","refused","Board considered the Public Utilities Commission report on bus and rail transit across the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",234,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n233",null,"Consideration of report of Public Utilities Commission on the subject of bus and rail transportation across the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:235/2",1935,1935,"1935-03-04","motion","transit","passed","Motion approving rail transportation across the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge was carried.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",235,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n234",null,"Supervisor Colman moved that rail transportation across the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge be approved by the Board",null,null,"n","a",0,5.4],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:368/7",1935,1935,"1935-03-20","other",null,"referred","San Mateo County recommended the Mills Field vicinity as the site for a 1938 Bay Bridge exposition; referred to Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",368,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n367",null,"World's Exposition on Mills Field Site. Telegram was presented and read by the Clerk from E. B. Hinman",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:402/1",1935,1935,"1935-03-26","other","transit",null,"The Board asked the Clerk to contact Senator McGovern and Florence McAuliffe about Senate Bill 511 on Bay Bridge rapid transit districts.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",402,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n401",null,"Rapid Transit Districts for Bay Bridge Transportation. The following was presented and read by the Clerk:",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:532/4",1935,1935,"1935-05-06","resolution",null,"passed","Ratto presented Resolution 1932 letting Healy-Tibbitts Construction build false work on Fourth Street for Bay Bridge approaches.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",532,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n531",null,"Permission to Construct False Work in Certain Streets and Temporarily Divert Traffic From and Over",null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sd:0bfff7c22c",1935,1935,"1935-05-06",null,"transport","passed","Fourth Street partly closed for Bay Bridge work, May-July 1935","unverified",null,null,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n531/mode/1up",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.53],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:594/1",1935,1935,"1935-05-20","resolution",null,"passed","The Board records itself in favor of hiring a traffic engineer to study Bay Bridge traffic distribution.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",594,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n593",null,"Declaring in Favor of Procuring Services of Traffic Expert for Studies in Connection With San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich|155",1935,1935,"1935-05-20","resolution","getting-around",null,"Traffic engineer to be hired for Bay Bridge traffic study","unverified","journalofproceed30sanfrich",594,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n593",null,"Resolution No. 1946, as follows: Whereas, serious traffic problems will be presented upon completion of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, the solution of which will entail the expenditure of gi-eat sums of money; and Whereas, the time is imminent when surveys and studies should be made for the p",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceed30sanfrich/593/95ceb05f",1935,1935,"1935-05-20","resolution",null,"passed","Traffic engineer to be hired for Bay Bridge traffic study","unverified","journalofproceed30sanfrich",594,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n593",null,"Declaring in Favor of Procuring Services of Traffic Expert for Studies in Connection With San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:641/2",1935,1935,"1935-05-24","other",null,"passed","Live stock pavilion of $250,000 (≈ $6.1 million in 2026 dollars) for Agricultural District No. 1A approved, to be built for the Bay Bridge Exposition.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",641,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n640",null,"Line 34, sheet 1 (not in printed budget, see Mayor's letter of recommendation), Agricultural District No.",null,null,"n","a",0,7.68],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:984/3",1935,1935,"1935-06-17","resolution",null,"continued","A proposal to hire a traffic engineer for Bay Bridge traffic studies was laid over four weeks.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",984,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n979",null,"Declaring in Favor of Procuring Services of Traffic Expert for Studies in Connection With San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1043/2",1935,1935,"1935-07-01","resolution","transit",null,"Supervisor Uhl proposed asking the California Toll Bridge Authority not to grant exclusive Bay Bridge franchises beyond ten years.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1043,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1038",null,"California Toll Bridge Authority Requested Not to Grant Exclusive Franchise Over Bay Bridge for Longer Period",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1198/2",1935,1935,"1935-07-15","resolution",null,"continued","Streets Committee recommendation to hire a traffic engineer for Bay Bridge traffic studies laid over one week.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1198,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1191",null,"Declaring in Favor of Procuring Services of Traffic Expert for Studies in Connection with San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1225/1",1935,1935,"1935-07-22","other","transit",null,"Interurban rail contracts over the Bay Bridge were made a special order of business for the following Monday at 3:30 p.m.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1225,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1218",null,"Interurban Rail Contracts San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1227/1",1935,1935,"1935-07-24","other","transit","continued","Interurban rail contracts for the Bay Bridge were continued to July 29, 1935, with a call for 40 percent of the bridge loan.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1227,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1220",null,"Relative to Contracts Between Interurban Rail Carriers and California Toll Bridge Authority for Use of San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1238/1",1935,1935,"1935-07-29","hearing","transit","continued","Hearing on proposed interurban rail contracts for the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge was deferred two weeks.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1238,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1231",null,"Hearing, as per request of City Attorney, on proposed contracts between interurban rail transit companies on San Francisco-Oakland",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1258/1",1935,1935,"1935-07-29","motion","transit","passed","Havenner's motion asks the Public Utilities Commission whether over $15,000,000 (≈ $368.9 million in 2026 dollars) of the Bay Bridge cost is interurban transportation.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1258,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1251",null,"San Francisco- Oakland Bay Bridge Data Requested. Supervisor Havenner moved that the Public Utilities Commission be requested",null,null,"n","a",0,3.53],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1303/1",1935,1935,"1935-08-12","hearing","transit",null,"Board held a hearing on proposed contracts between interurban rail companies and the State Toll Bridge Authority for the Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1303,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1296",null,"Hearing re Contracts Between Interurban Rail Companies and California Toll Bridge Authority.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1303/3",1935,1935,"1935-08-12","hearing","transit","continued","Board postponed action on the Bay Bridge terminal site at The Embarcadero until Tuesday, August 20, 1935.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1303,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1296",null,"Hearing — Embarcadero Terminal Plan. Hearing for proponents of the Embarcadero Terminal Plans",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1319/2",1935,1935,"1935-08-12","motion","transit","passed","Public Utilities Commission ordered to study and report on Bay Bridge terminal plans, including the Embarcadero and uptown proposals.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1319,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1312",null,"Bay Bridge Terminal Plan Query. Supervisor Havenner moved that the Public Utilities Commission be requested",null,null,"n","a",0,3.53],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1344/1",1935,1935,"1935-08-20","hearing","transit",null,"A hearing on proposed Embarcadero Terminal Plans for the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge was held, with no outcome yet printed.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1344,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1337",null,"Hearing — Embarcadero Terminal Plan. Hearing for proponents of the Embarcadero Terminal Plans for San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1344/2",1935,1935,"1935-08-20","hearing","transit",null,"A hearing on proposed contracts between interurban rail companies and the California Toll Bridge Authority for the Bay Bridge was held, with no outcome yet printed.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1344,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1337",null,"Hearing re Contracts Between Interurban Rail Companies and California Toll Bridge Authority. Hearing, as per request of City Attorney, on proposed contracts between interurban rail transit companies",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1354/1",1935,1935,"1935-08-26","motion",null,"passed","Supervisor Hayden moved a vote of thanks to Engineer Purcell and his staff for help with the Bay Bridge terminal discussions.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1354,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1347",null,"Supervisor Hayden moved a vote of thanks to Engineer Purcell and his staff for their assistance in these discussions.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1381/2",1935,1935,"1935-08-26","resolution","transit","referred","A resolution asking the City Attorney to require rail users to share Bay Bridge costs was referred to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1381,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1374",null,"Proposed Provisions in Rails Contract on San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1383/2",1935,1935,"1935-08-26","resolution","transit","referred","Supervisor proposed asking the City Attorney to require railroads using the Bay Bridge lower deck to share costs and stay open.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1383,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1376",null,"Proposed Provisions in Rails Contract on San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1456/1",1935,1935,"1935-09-03","resolution","transit","continued","Resolution proposed telling state and federal bridge authorities to require rail carriers to pay their share of Bay Bridge costs; laid over one week.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1456,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1449",null,"Suggested Provisions for Rail Contract on San Francisco- Oakland Bay Bridge. (Code No. 12.111) Resolution No. 2124, as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1481/2",1935,1935,"1935-09-10","resolution","transit",null,"Supervisor McSheehy proposed rail contract conditions for the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge; laid over one week.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1481,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1474",null,"Suggested Provisions for Rail Contract on San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1507/2",1935,1935,"1935-09-16","resolution","transit",null,"Proposed resolution sets conditions for railroad use of the Bay Bridge lower deck, to be considered by the Committee of the Whole.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1507,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1500",null,"Resolution No. 2124, as follows: Resolved, That the City Attorney advise the Governor",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1540/2",1935,1935,"1935-09-23","resolution","transit",null,"Resolution urges the City Attorney to require railroads using the Bay Bridge lower deck to pay a set share of the loan.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1540,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1533",null,"Public Utilities Committee recommends that the following resolution be heard in Committee of the Whole",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1555/1",1935,1935,"1935-09-30","resolution","transit",null,"Board proposes that rail carriers using the Bay Bridge's lower deck pay their proportionate share, not vehicle users.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1555,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1548",null,"Suggested provisions for Rail Contract on San Francisco-Oak- land Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1569/1",1935,1935,"1935-10-07","resolution","transit",null,"The Board proposes that railroads using the Bay Bridge lower deck pay their own share of the bridge loan.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1569,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1562",null,"Resolution No. 2124, as follows: Resolved, That the City Attorney advise the Governor of the",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1571/1",1935,1935,"1935-10-07","resolution","transit","passed","Board urged the state Toll Bridge Authority to keep Bay Bridge vehicle tolls at the lowest possible rates and protest any increase.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1571,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1564",null,"Supervisor Havenner, seconded by Supervisor Hayden, moved as substitute for Resolution No. 2124, Special Order for 2:30 p.m.",null,null,"n","a",0,8.4],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1657/4",1935,1935,"1935-10-28","motion","transit","passed","Apartment owners' complaint about Bay Bridge vehicle tolls made a special order of business for November 4, 1935.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1657,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1650",null,"Vehicular Tolls on San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. Communication from Owners and Lessees' Apartment House",null,null,"n","a",0,2.45],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1698/2",1935,1935,"1935-11-12","other","transit","referred","Plan by Sidney W. Taylor for a sub-surface Bay Bridge terminal was referred to a joint committee.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1698,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1691",null,"Supervisor Colman presented, at the request of the Down Town Association, and with his own approval, plan by",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich:1767/1",1935,1935,"1935-12-02","motion","transit","passed","Supervisors rejected the Taylor subsurface plan for the Bay Bridge terminal and voted against considering further alternative terminal plans.","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1767,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1760",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge Terminal. Joint Committee on Public Utilities and Streets having under consideration Taylor subsurface terminal plan",null,null,"n","a",0,4.9],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed30sanfrich|564",1935,1935,"1935-12-30","ordinance","public-money","passed","$16,500 (≈ $405,804 in 2026 dollars) for street lighting on the Bay Bridge approach streets","quoted","journalofproceed30sanfrich",1911,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed30sanfrich/page/n1904",null,"Ordinance No. 9.051220, as follows: Authorizing a supplemental appropriation of $16,500, out of the accrued surplus existing in the reserve in Appropriation No. 563.231.00, for the construction and reconstruction of lighting systems on certain San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge approach streets. Be it",null,null,"n","a",0,1.77],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:105/2",1984,1936,"1936","building","ordinance or legislation",null,"Bay Bridge · built: opened","unverified","C124887761",105,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n104",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:14/1",2000,1936,"1936","building","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · built: 1936 opening","unverified","C124925065",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n13","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich|11",1936,1936,"1936-01-13","ordinance","public-money","passed","$16,500 (≈ $399,965 in 2026 dollars) for street lighting on the Bay Bridge approach streets","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",97,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n97",null,"Ordinance No. 9.051220, as follows: Authorizing a supplemental appropriation of $16,500, out of the accrued surplus existing in the reserve in Appropriation No. 563.231.00, for the construction and reconstruction of lighting systems on certain San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge approach streets, and o",null,null,"n","a",0,1.77],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:212/1",1936,1936,"1936-02-10","resolution",null,"passed","Board urged a ban on billboards and advertising on roofs facing the Bay Bridge approach, and asked committee to draft legislation.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",212,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n212",null,"Re- location, Widening and Beautification of San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge Approaches.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.96],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich|75",1936,1936,"1936-02-10","resolution","the-street","passed","Ban on billboards near the Bay Bridge approach sought","unverified","journalofproceed31sanfrich",212,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n212",null,"Resolution No. 2395, as follows: Whereas, the Board of Supervisors has pledged the City and County of San Francisco to contribute $400,000 toward the cost of re-locating, widening and beautifying the vehicular approach to the San Francisco- Oakland Bay Bridge, as recommended by the Art Commission; a",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.06],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:335/2",1936,1936,"1936-03-16","resolution","transit",null,"A proposed subway from the Bay Bridge approach at Fifth and Harrison to Union Square was put forward by Supervisor Shannon.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",335,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n335",null,"Proposed Subway from Bridge Approach at Fifth and Harrison to Union Square. (Code No. 12.112) On motion of Supervisor Shannon",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:338/1",1936,1936,"1936-03-16","resolution",null,"passed","The Mayor was asked to appoint a citizens committee to celebrate the opening of the Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",338,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n338",null,"Mayor to Appoint Citizens Committee to Celebrate Opening of San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,3.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:356/4",1936,1936,"1936-03-23","other","transit","referred","The Civic League of Improvement Clubs sent a communication about traffic to the retail district from the Bay Bridge head.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",356,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n356",null,"Traffic to Retail District from San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge Head. The following was presented and read",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:358/1",1936,1936,"1936-03-23","motion","transit",null,"Supervisor Uhl asked the Public Utilities Commission for a progress report on a $25,000 (≈ $606,007 in 2026 dollars) study of a subway to the Bay Bridge terminal.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",358,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n358",null,"Progress Report Requested on $25,000 Appropriation for Study of Subway to Bay Bridge Terminal.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:383/2",1936,1936,"1936-04-06","resolution","transit",null,"Supervisor Shannon proposed resolution 2504 directing committees to devise ways to handle Bay Bridge opening traffic.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",383,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n383",null,"Streets, Public Utilities and Finance Committees Instrucuted to Devise Ways and Means to Meet Traffic Emergency",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:390/3",1936,1936,"1936-04-06","resolution",null,null,"Supervisor Shannon presented a resolution asking Congress to issue silver coins commemorating the Bay Bridge's completion.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",390,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n390",null,"Congress to Issue Silver Coins Commemorating Completion of San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:407/3",1936,1936,"1936-04-13","resolution",null,null,"Resolution asks the Navy to send its U.S. Fleet to San Francisco Bay for the Bay Bridge opening celebration.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",407,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n407",null,"Secretary of the Navy Requested to Detail U. S. Fleet to San Francisco Bay During Celebration",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:446/3",1936,1936,"1936-04-27","ordinance","transit","passed","The Board finally passed an emergency ordinance appropriating $10,000 (≈ $242,403 in 2026 dollars) to the City Engineer for a Bay Bridge traffic study.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",446,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n446",null,"Appropriation $10,000, to City Engineer, for Traffic Study in Connection with Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.65],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:447/1",1936,1936,"1936-04-27","ordinance",null,"passed","Emergency ordinance appropriates $10,000 (≈ $242,403 in 2026 dollars) for a City Engineer traffic study of streets feeding the Bay Bridge; passed.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",447,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n447",null,"Appropriation $10,000, to City Engineer, for Traffic Study in Connection with Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:556/1",1936,1936,"1936-05-04","resolution","transit","passed","Board asked federal government for a 45 per cent grant toward a rapid transit line from the Bay Bridge to Third and Townsend Streets.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",556,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n556",null,"Federal Grant, 45 Per Cent of the Cost of Rapid Transit System from Plan \"X\" to Third",null,null,"n","a",0,4.65],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:682/2",1936,1936,"1936-05-18","resolution",null,"passed","The Board adopted a resolution directing the Clerk to send invitations to county supervisors for the Bay Bridge opening celebration.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",682,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n682",null,"Clerk to Prepare Invitations to County Supervisors to Attend Celebration for Opening of San Francisco Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich|319",1936,1936,"1936-05-18","resolution","civic-life","passed","Counties invited to the Bay Bridge opening in November","unverified","journalofproceed31sanfrich",682,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n682",null,"Resolution No. 2585, as follows: Resolved, That the Clerk of the Board is authorized and directed to prepare an official invitation from the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco to the Boards of Supervisors of the several counties of the State of California, requesting their ",null,null,"n","a",0,1.53],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:939/1",1936,1936,"1936-06-01","ordinance","transit","passed first reading","Board passed on first reading a $4,500 (≈ $109,081 in 2026 dollars) appropriation for traffic signals in the district south of Market Street near the Bay Bridge approaches.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",939,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n939",null,"Appropriating $4,500 for Installation of Traffic Signals in Connection with San Francisco- Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.53],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:940/1",1936,1936,"1936-06-01","ordinance",null,"passed","Appropriation of $4,500 (≈ $109,081 in 2026 dollars) approved for traffic signals south of Market Street near the Bay Bridge approach streets.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",940,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n940",null,"Appropriating $4,500 for Installation of Traffic Signals in Connection with San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich|352",1936,1936,"1936-06-01","ordinance","the-street","passed","$4,500 (≈ $109,081 in 2026 dollars) for traffic signals on the Bay Bridge approach streets","unverified","journalofproceed31sanfrich",939,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n939",null,"Ordinance No. 9.051268, as follows: Authorizing a supplemental appropriation of $4,500 out of the surplus existing in the County Road Fund to the credit of Appropriation No. 547.903.07, for the installation of traffic signals in the district south of Market street, in connection with the San Francis",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:988/1",1936,1936,"1936-06-15","ordinance","transit","passed","Board finally passed $4,500 (≈ $109,081 in 2026 dollars) for traffic signals south of Market Street near the Bay Bridge approach streets.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",988,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n988",null,"Appropriating $4,500 for Installation of Traffic Signals in Connection with San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.65],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich|369",1936,1936,"1936-06-15","ordinance","the-street","passed","$4,500 (≈ $109,081 in 2026 dollars) for traffic signals on the Bay Bridge approach streets","unverified","journalofproceed31sanfrich",988,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n988",null,"Ordinance No. 9.051268, as follows: Authorizing a supplemental appropriation of $4,500 out of the surplus existing in the County Road F*und to the credit of Appropriation No. 547.903.07, for the installation of traffic signals in the district south of Market street, in connection with the San Franci",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:1196/3",1936,1936,"1936-07-13","motion",null,"passed","The Board endorsed the Chamber of Commerce request for a day when pedestrians may walk across the completed San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1196,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1196",null,"Pedestrian Day on San Francisco- Oakland Bay Bridge. Communication from San Francisco Chamber of Commerce suggest- ing that upon completion",null,null,"n","a",0,2.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:1315/2",1936,1936,"1936-07-27","resolution",null,"passed","Residents are urged to visit Oakland on November 12, 1936, when the Bay Bridge opens to vehicles.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1315,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1315",null,"San Francisco to Visit Oakland on Completion of Bay Bridge. (Code No. 12.112) Supervisor Havenner presented:",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:1611/5",1936,1936,"1936-09-21","resolution",null,"referred","Supervisor Shannon's resolution asks Dr. McClintock to expedite a traffic report on linking the Bay Bridge terminal to shopping.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1611,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1611",null,"Dr. McClintock to Expedite Report on Traffic.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:1618/1",1936,1936,"1936-09-21","ordinance",null,"referred","Supervisor Uhl re-presents a proposed ordinance banning advertising signs and billboards within 800 feet of the Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1618,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1618",null,"Sign and Billboard Ordinance. (Code No. 11.08) Thereupon Supervisor Uhl presented: Bill No , Ordinance No , as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:1637/3",1936,1936,"1936-09-28","resolution",null,"withdrawn","Board asked traffic expert Dr. Miller McClintock to report early on Bay Bridge traffic links to the triangle shopping district.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1637,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1637",null,"Requesting Early Report from Dr. McClintock on Traffic Survey. (Code No. 11.02) On recommendation of Streets Committee.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:1640/3",1936,1936,"1936-09-28","motion",null,"refused","Motion to recess the Board until October 1 to consider billboards on the Bay Bridge approach was lost.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1640,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1640",null,"Supervisor Adolph Uhl announced that the matter of erection of billboards along the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge approach",null,null,"n","a",0,1.7],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:1703/1",1936,1936,"1936-10-05","ordinance",null,null,"Proposed ordinance would ban billboards and advertising signs visible from the Bay Bridge near Fifth and Harrison Streets; committee recommends against passage.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1703,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1703",null,"Sign and Billboard Ordinance. (Code No. 11.08) Referred to Board by Joint Committee on Fire, Safety and Police, and Streets.",null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:1704/1",1936,1936,"1936-10-05","ordinance",null,"refused","Billboard and advertising sign ordinance for areas visible from the Bay Bridge was defeated by eight votes to three.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1704,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1704",null,"be deemed a separate and distinct offense and shall be punishable accordingly. Committee of the Whole.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:1757/2",1936,1936,"1936-10-19","resolution",null,"passed","Resolution adopted urging the Toll Bridge Authority to charge 50 cents per private car on the Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1757,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1757",null,"Endorsing 50-Cent Toll for San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,4.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:1758/2",1936,1936,"1936-10-19","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Supervisor Shannon presented an ordinance regulating billboards and advertising devices at the Bay Bridge approach, text printed here.'","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1758,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1758",null,"Regulating Billboard Advertising at Bay Bridge Approach. (Code No. 11.08) Supervisor Shannon presented: Bill No. 1150",null,null,"n","a",0,0.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:1759/1",1936,1936,"1936-10-19","ordinance",null,"continued","Supervisors failed to suspend rules for a billboard ban near the Bay Bridge approach; the bill was continued to October 26, 1936.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1759,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1759",null,"Regulating Billboard Advertising at Bay Bridge Approach. (Code No. 11.08)",null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich|611",1936,1936,"1936-10-19","resolution","getting-around","passed","Fifty-cent Bay Bridge toll urged on the California Toll Bridge Authority","unverified","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1757,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1757",null,"Resolution No. 2868, as follows: Whereas, the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge is approaching completion; and Whereas, the California Toll Bridge Authority is about to fix the tolls and charges for vehicles travelling over said bridge; and Whereas, privately owned and operated passenger automobiles ",null,null,"n","a",0,2.74],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:1765/2",1936,1936,"1936-10-26","ordinance",null,null,"Supervisor Shannon proposed banning billboards and signs within 350 feet of the Bay Bridge; the matter was laid over one week.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1765,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1765",null,"Regulating Location of Billboards at Bridge Approach. (Code No. 11,08)",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:1779/3",1936,1936,"1936-10-26","resolution",null,"referred","Supervisor Ratto presented a resolution asking the City Attorney to survey finances supporting a 50-cent Bay Bridge toll.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1779,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1779",null,"50c Rate on San Francisco- Oakland Bay Bridge. (Code No. 12.112) Supervisor Ratto presented: Resolution No.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:1789/2",1936,1936,"1936-11-02","ordinance",null,"withdrawn","Supervisor Shannon withdrew his proposed ordinance regulating billboard advertising within 350 feet of the Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1789,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1789",null,"Regulating Billboard Advertising at Bay Bridge Approach.",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:1814/3",1936,1936,"1936-11-02","other","transit","referred","Lieutenant-Governor George J. Hatfield's recommendation on San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge tolls was referred to the Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1814,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1814",null,"Supervisor Shannon presented copy of recommendation by Lieutenant-Governor George J. Hatfield, addressed to the Financial Advisory Committee",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:1962/2",1936,1936,"1936-11-23","resolution",null,null,"Resolution commending Chinese citizens for their participation in the parades celebrating the Bay Bridge's completion.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",1962,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n1962",null,"Commending Chinese Citizens for Their Participation in San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge Celebration.",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:2293/1",1936,1936,"1936-12-28","motion","transit",null,"Board refused the Southern Pacific Railway's proposed extension of its trains to a terminal near the Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",2293,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n2293",null,"Extension of S. P. Trains to Bridge Terminal Refused.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:125/3",2002,1937,"1937","building","environmental impact report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge (SFOBB) · built year: completed","unverified","C101747471",125,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n124",null,null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:42/4",1937,1937,"1937-01-04","resolution",null,"referred","Supervisor Schmidt presented a resolution endorsing the Chronicle's plan to cut Bay Bridge tolls from 65 to 25 cents.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",42,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n39",null,"Endorsing \"Chronicle\" Plan to Fix Bay Bridge Toll at 25c. (Code No. ) Supervisor Schmidt presented: Resolution No, 3018, as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:77/2",1937,1937,"1937-01-11","ordinance",null,"submitted_to_voters","Initiative ordinance banning billboards near the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge was ordered submitted to voters at the March 2, 1937 election.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",77,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n72",null,"Initiative Ordinance Prohibiting Billboard. (Code No. 11.08) Bill No. 121.5, Ordinance No. 11.0820",null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:78/1",1937,1937,"1937-01-11","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Initiative banning billboards near the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge passed second reading and goes to voters March 2, 1937.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",78,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n73",null,"Initiative Ordinance Prohibiting Billboard. (Code No. 11.08) Bill No. 121.5, Ordinance No. 11.0820, as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-0.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:190/1",1937,1937,"1937-01-18","ballot_measure",null,"passed first reading","Bill to submit a Bay Bridge billboard ban initiative to voters on March 9, 1937 passed second reading.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",190,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n183",null,"Directing Submission to Electors of Initiative Ordinance on Billboards. (Code No. 11.08)",null,null,"n","a",0,-0.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:190/2",1937,1937,"1937-01-18","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","A bill for a Bay Bridge billboard ban, set for a March 2, 1937 vote, was repealed.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",190,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n183",null,"Billboard Ordinance. (Code No. 11.08) Bill No. 1215. Ordinance No. 11.0820, as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:191/1",1937,1937,"1937-01-18","ballot_measure",null,"continued","Action on a petition for a special election on a Bay Bridge billboard ban was deferred.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",191,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n184",null,"Section 1. A petition for the enactment of a proposed ordinance entitled as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:231/2",1937,1937,"1937-01-25","resolution",null,"passed","Board commends the Sunrise Breakfast Club for taking about two thousand children across the Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",231,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n224",null,"Commending Sunrise Breakfast Club for Its Caravan of San Francisco Children Across the Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,-0.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:257/2",1937,1937,"1937-02-01","ballot_measure",null,"submitted_to_voters","Petition ordinance banning signboards near the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge was ordered submitted to voters on March 9, 1937.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",257,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n250",null,"Ordinance Prohibiting Signboards Within Certain Distances of San Frajicisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:258/1",1937,1937,"1937-02-01","ordinance",null,"passed","Ordinance banning signboards near the Bay Bridge passed, to go to voters at a March 9, 1937 special election.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",258,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n251",null,"Ordinance Prohibiting Signboards Within Certain Distances of San Frajicisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:375/2",1937,1937,"1937-03-01","motion","transit","passed","Board members were invited to test travel routes to the Bay Bridge head on March 2, 1937.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",375,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n368",null,"Supervisor Roncovieri announced that Chief Administrative Officer Alfred J. Cleary had invited members of the Board",null,null,"n","a",0,2.15],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:376/1",1937,1937,"1937-03-01","resolution",null,null,"Supervisor Schmidt called Resolution 3018 out of committee, making it a special order for March 8, endorsing the Chronicle's plan for a twenty-five cent bay bridge toll.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",376,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n369",null,"Resolution No. 3018, Called Out of Committee. Supervisor Schmidt called out from Committee, Resolution No. 3018, endorsing",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:395/1",1937,1937,"1937-03-08","resolution",null,"continued","Resolution urging a 25-cent Bay Bridge toll, proposed by the Chronicle, was deferred until March 22, 1937.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",395,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n388",null,"Providing for 25c Toll on S. F.-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich|170",1937,1937,"1937-03-08","resolution","public-money","continued","Chronicle plan backed to cut Bay Bridge tolls to twenty-five cents","unverified","journalofproceed32sanfrich",395,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n388",null,"Resolution No. 3018, as follows: Wliereas, it is only fair and equitable that posterity bear some part of the financial burden of the cost of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, and, in pursuance of that thought, the San Francisco Chronicle has proposed a refinancing plan whereby the present tolls",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:479/2",1937,1937,"1937-03-22","resolution",null,"referred","Supervisor Brown's resolution proposing a 25-cent Bay Bridge toll was referred back to the Streets and Finance Committee for four weeks.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",479,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n472",null,"Providing for 25c Toll on S. F.-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich|206",1937,1937,"1937-03-22","resolution","public-money","referred","Chronicle plan would cut Bay Bridge tolls to twenty-five cents","unverified","journalofproceed32sanfrich",479,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n472",null,"Resolution No. 3018, as follows: Wliereas, it is only fair and equitable that posterity bear some part of the financial burden of the cost of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, and, in pursuance of that thought, the San Francisco Chronicle has proposed a refinancing plan whereby the present tolls",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:589/2",1937,1937,"1937-04-12","other","whats-being-built",null,"Committee recommends immediate construction of the Fifth Street extension from Mission to Market Street, toward the Bay Bridge.\n","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",589,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n582",null,"Fifth street was selected as the logical terminal for the Bay Bridge and its significant traffic",null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:760/1",1937,1937,"1937-05-21","communication",null,"passed","Board concurred in the Mayor's supplemental Public Works budget requests, except the $97,500 (≈ $2.3 million in 2026 dollars) Bay Bridge approach item.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",760,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n751",null,"Communication. The following were presented and read by the Clerk: To the Honorable the Board",null,null,"n","a",0,3.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:1378/1",1937,1937,"1937-07-19","resolution",null,"refused","Supervisor Schmidt's resolution urging a 25-cent Bay Bridge toll, based on a Chronicle refinancing plan, was defeated.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",1378,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n1369",null,"Supervisor Schmidt's Resolution Re 25c Bridge Toll.",null,null,"n","a",0,6.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich|473",1937,1937,"1937-07-19","resolution","public-money","refused","Chronicle plan to cut Bay Bridge tolls to 25 cents endorsed","unverified","journalofproceed32sanfrich",1378,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n1369",null,"Resolution No. 3018, as follows: Whereas, it is only fair and equitable that posterity bear some part of the financial burden of the cost of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, and in pursuance of that thought, the San Francisco Chronicle has proposed a refinancing plan whereby the present tolls m",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:1683/3",1937,1937,"1937-08-30","resolution","transit","referred","Resolution on reduced ferry fares and falling Bay Bridge and Golden Gate Bridge tolls is presented for a northern California conference; sent to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",1683,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n1674",null,"Conference of City Officials and Delegates of 45 Northern California Supervisors re Bridge-Highway Situation. (Code No. 5.31) Supervisor Schmidt presented: Resolution No. 3513",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:1839/5",1937,1937,"1937-10-11","resolution","transit",null,"Schmidt brings forward a resolution endorsing the Chronicle's plan to fix the Bay Bridge toll at 25 cents.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",1839,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n1830",null,"Reduction of Bridge Toll to Twenty-five Cents. Supervisor Schmidt called out of Committee, Joint Streets and Finance, Resolution No. 3018",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:1847/1",1937,1937,"1937-10-18","resolution",null,"continued","Action on a resolution seeking a conference on Bay Bridge tolls was deferred until October 31, 1937.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",1847,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n1838",null,"Resolved, That the Mayor of the City and County of San Francisco be respectfully requested",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:1847/2",1937,1937,"1937-10-18","resolution","transit","continued","Proposed resolution endorsing the Chronicle's plan to cut Bay Bridge tolls to 25 cents was put off until October 25, 1937.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",1847,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n1838",null,"Endorsing \"Chronicle\" Plan to Fix Bay Bridge Toll at 25 Cents.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich|709",1937,1937,"1937-10-18","resolution","public-money","continued","Chronicle plan to cut Bay Bridge tolls to 25 cents endorsed","unverified","journalofproceed32sanfrich",1847,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n1838",null,"Resolution No. 3018, as follows: Whereas, it is only fair and equitable that posterity bear some part of the financial burden of the cost of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, and in pursuance of that thought, the San Francisco Chronicle has proposed a refinancing plan whereby the present tolls m",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:1873/1",1937,1937,"1937-10-25","resolution",null,"continued","Resolution endorses the Chronicle's plan to cut Bay Bridge tolls from 65 to 25 cents; outcome not shown on this page.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",1873,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n1864",null,"Endorsing \"Chronicle\" Plan to Fix Bay Bridge Toll at 25 Cents.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich|722",1937,1937,"1937-10-25","resolution","public-money","continued","Chronicle plan to cut Bay Bridge tolls to 25 cents endorsed","unverified","journalofproceed32sanfrich",1873,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n1864",null,"Resolution No. 3018, as follows: Whereas, it is only fair and equitable that posterity bear some part of the financial burden of the cost of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, and in pursuance of that thought, the San Francisco Chronicle has proposed a refinancing plan whereby the present tolls m",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:1902/2",1937,1937,"1937-11-08","resolution","transit","passed","Resolution endorses a San Francisco Chronicle plan to cut Bay Bridge tolls from sixty-five to twenty-five cents per car.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",1902,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n1893",null,"Endorsing \"Chronicle\" Plan to Fix Bay Bridge Toll at 25 Cents. (Code No. 12.112) Resolution No. 3018, as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:1918/1",1937,1937,"1937-11-15","resolution",null,"referred","Resolution endorsing the San Francisco Chronicle's plan to cut Bay Bridge tolls to 25 cents is proposed.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",1918,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n1909",null,"Endorsing \"Chronicle\" Plan to Fix Bay Bridge ToU at 25 Cents.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:85/4",1947,1938,"1938","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · cost usd: Bridge toll for passenger cars 50 cents each way","unverified","C124921430",85,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n84",null,"bridge toll for passenger cars 50 cents each way",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed33sanfrich:412/1",1938,1938,"1938-03-21","resolution","transit",null,"Resolution urging the Toll Bridge Authority to defer the ferry franchise purchase and cut Bay Bridge tolls is still under debate.","quoted","journalofproceed33sanfrich",412,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed33sanfrich/page/n412",null,"These several political subdivisions urge the California Toll Bridge Authority to defer consideration of the purchase",null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed33sanfrich:413/1",1938,1938,"1938-03-21","motion",null,null,"The Board took a roll call on Supervisor McSheehy's amendment to the Bay Bridge toll motion; the result continues on the next page.","quoted","journalofproceed33sanfrich",413,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed33sanfrich/page/n413",null,"Call the roll, Mr. Clerk. On the amendment by Supervisor McSheehy.",null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed33sanfrich:417/1",1938,1938,"1938-03-21","resolution","transit",null,"Supervisors debated Resolution 3817 to buy ferry franchises to reduce Bay Bridge and Golden Gate Bridge competition; no final vote printed here.","quoted","journalofproceed33sanfrich",417,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed33sanfrich/page/n417",null,"I wish to explain my vote on Resolution Number 3817, and I desire that my explanation",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed33sanfrich:467/1",1938,1938,"1938-03-28","motion",null,"refused","The Board rejected a motion to send a three-member committee to Sacramento over Bay Bridge costs and tolls.","quoted","journalofproceed33sanfrich",467,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed33sanfrich/page/n467",null,"The motion is that a committee of three be sent to Sacramento, and Supervisor McSheehy be made a member",null,null,"n","a",0,5.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed33sanfrich:1099/1",1938,1938,"1938-06-20","ordinance","transit","passed","Board passes a $75,000 (≈ $1.8 million in 2026 dollars) appropriation for railway tracks to Plan X Terminal of the Bay Bridge, with Market Street Railway loop use.","quoted","journalofproceed33sanfrich",1099,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed33sanfrich/page/n1099",null,"Supplemental Appropriation of 875,000 for Construction of Railway Tracks and Plan X Terminal.",null,null,"n","a",0,6.9],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed33sanfrich:1155/1",1938,1938,"1938-06-27","resolution","transit","passed","Resolution proposed to approve the Rapid Transit Committee's recommendations, including a Market Street pedestrian passage from the Bay Bridge terminal, funded by bonds.","quoted","journalofproceed33sanfrich",1155,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed33sanfrich/page/n1155",null,"Resolved, That the substance of the report of the Rapid Transit Committee now pending before this Board be approved",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed33sanfrich:1160/1",1938,1938,"1938-06-27","resolution",null,"referred","Supervisor Reilly's resolution to seek a 45 percent federal grant for a pedestrian way at the Bay Bridge Terminal was referred to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed33sanfrich",1160,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed33sanfrich/page/n1160",null,"Pedestrian Way, Bay Bridge Terminal, Across Market Street. (Code No. 12.11) Resolution No. 4070",null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed33sanfrich|345",1938,1938,"1938-06-27","resolution","public-money",null,"Federal grant sought for a walkway from the Bay Bridge terminal","unverified","journalofproceed33sanfrich",1160,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed33sanfrich/page/n1160",null,"Resolution No. 4070, as follows: Be It Resolved, By the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco: That the Mayor, the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and the Controller be and they are hereby authorized and directed to execute and file an application on behalf of the City and C",null,null,"n","a",0,2.94],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed33sanfrich|353",1938,1938,"1938-07-05","resolution","city-services","passed","Federal grant sought for a walkway from the Bay Bridge terminal","unverified","journalofproceed33sanfrich",1173,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed33sanfrich/page/n1173",null,"Resolution No. 4070, as follows: Be It Resolved, By the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco: That the Mayor, the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and the Controller be and they are hereby authorized and directed to execute and file an application on behalf of the City and C",null,null,"n","a",0,2.94],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed33sanfrich:1832/2",1938,1938,"1938-09-19","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Ordinance reappropriating $131.13 (≈ $3,134 in 2026 dollars) for extra work on safety islands at the Fifth Street approach to Bay Bridge passed for second reading.","quoted","journalofproceed33sanfrich",1832,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed33sanfrich/page/n1832",null,"Reappropriating $131.13 From Appropriation No. 951.920.01 as Payment for Extra Work in Excess",null,null,"n","a",0,2.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed33sanfrich:1912/1",1938,1938,"1938-10-03","ordinance",null,"passed","Board passed an ordinance reappropriating $131.13 (≈ $3,134 in 2026 dollars) for extra work on safety islands at Fifth Street approach to Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed33sanfrich",1912,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed33sanfrich/page/n1912",null,"Reappropriating $131.13 From Appropriation No. 951.920.01 as Payment for Extra Work in Excess",null,null,"n","a",0,2.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed33sanfrich:2304/2",1938,1938,"1938-12-19","ordinance","transit","referred","Proposed $15,000 (≈ $358,447 in 2026 dollars) from Municipal Railway surplus to finish switch and signal systems at the Bay Bridge Terminal; referred to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed33sanfrich",2304,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed33sanfrich/page/n2304",null,"Supplemental Appropriation of $15,000 to Provide Funds for Completion of Switch and Signal Systems Necessary",null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed33sanfrich:2307/2",1938,1938,"1938-12-19","resolution","transit","passed","Board asked the Mayor to appoint a citizens' committee for the January 1939 dedication of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge rail terminal.","quoted","journalofproceed33sanfrich",2307,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed33sanfrich/page/n2307",null,"Mayor to Appoint Citizens' Committee to Arrange and Participate in the Dedicatory Services of the Opening",null,null,"n","a",0,3.65],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed33sanfrich:2326/2",1938,1938,"1938-12-27","ordinance","transit","passed first reading","Ordinance for $15,000 (≈ $358,447 in 2026 dollars) from Municipal Railway surplus for streetcar switches and signals at Bay Bridge Terminal passed second reading.","quoted","journalofproceed33sanfrich",2326,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed33sanfrich/page/n2326",null,"Supplemental Appropriation of SI 5,000 From Surplus in Municipal Railway Operating Fund for Completion of Switch",null,null,"n","a",0,3.9],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:81/2",1947,1939,"1939","event","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · event: Three transportation systems began running electric trains over the bridge","unverified","C124921430",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n80",null,"Three transportation systems ran electric trains over the present bridge after it was opened for that type of traffic in 1939.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed34sanfrich:89/1",1939,1939,"1939-01-09","ordinance","transit","passed","Ordinance passed appropriating $15,000 (≈ $363,604 in 2026 dollars) from Municipal Railway surplus to finish switch and signal work at Bay Bridge Terminal Station.","quoted","journalofproceed34sanfrich",89,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed34sanfrich/page/n87",null,"Supplemental Appropriation of $15,000 From Surplus in Municipal Railway Operating Fund for Completion of Switch and Signal",null,null,"n","a",0,3.78],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed34sanfrich:146/1",1939,1939,"1939-01-16","ordinance","transit","passed first reading","Supervisors passed on first reading a $8,320 (≈ $201,679 in 2026 dollars) appropriation for streetcar operation at the Bay Bridge terminal, half paid by Market Street Railway Company.","quoted","journalofproceed34sanfrich",146,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed34sanfrich/page/n144",null,"Supplemental Appropriation of 88,320 From Surplus in Municipal Railway Operating Fund for Operation of Street Railway System",null,null,"n","a",0,5.9],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed34sanfrich:158/3",1939,1939,"1939-01-16","motion","transit",null,"Supervisor Ratto asked Public Works for a cost estimate of a subway or overpass near Bay Bridge Terminal.","quoted","journalofproceed34sanfrich",158,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed34sanfrich/page/n156",null,"Subway or Overpass in the Vicinity of Bay Bridge Terminal. Supervisor Ratto moved that the Clerk be requested",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed34sanfrich|31",1939,1939,"1939-01-16","ordinance","public-money","continued","$8,320 (≈ $201,679 in 2026 dollars) to run streetcars at the Bay Bridge Terminal; put over to a later meeting","quoted","journalofproceed34sanfrich",145,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed34sanfrich/page/n143",null,"Ordinance No , as follows: Authorizing a supplemental appropriation of $8,320 from the surplus in the Municipal Railway Operating Fund to Provide for temporary salaries $8,000, and pension and retirement allowance $320, for the operation of the street railway system at the San Francisco Bay Bridge T",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed34sanfrich:203/2",1939,1939,"1939-01-25","other",null,null,"Mayor forwards Cahill and Purcell's five traffic recommendations for the Bay Bridge Terminal area to the Board and Police Commission.","quoted","journalofproceed34sanfrich",203,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed34sanfrich/page/n201",null,"Recommendations re Management of Traffic and Transportation in Bay Terminal Area. The following communications were read by the Clerk:",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed34sanfrich|67",1939,1939,"1939-01-30","ordinance","public-money","passed","$8,320 (≈ $201,679 in 2026 dollars) for streetcar service at the Bay Bridge Terminal","quoted","journalofproceed34sanfrich",210,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed34sanfrich/page/n208",null,"Ordinance No. 28, as follows: Authorizing a supplemental appropriation of $8,320 from the surplus in the Municipal Railway Operating Fund to Provide for temporary salaries $8,000, and pension and retirement allowance $320, for the operation of the street railway system at the San Francisco Bay Bridg",null,null,"n","a",0,1.77],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed34sanfrich:509/2",1939,1939,"1939-02-27","resolution",null,"referred","Governor asked to order separated traffic lanes on the Bay Bridge to stop fatal head-on collisions; referred to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed34sanfrich",509,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed34sanfrich/page/n503",null,"Governor Requested to Separate Traffic Lanes on San Francisco- Oakland Bay Bridge to Prevent Head-On Collisions.",null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed34sanfrich:545/2",1939,1939,"1939-03-06","resolution",null,null,"Board proposes asking the Governor to have the Toll Bridge Authority separate traffic lanes on the Bay Bridge to prevent head-on collisions.","quoted","journalofproceed34sanfrich",545,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed34sanfrich/page/n539",null,"Governor to Request Toll Bridge Authority to Provide for Separated Traffic Lanes on S. F.-Oakland Bay Bridge to Prevent",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed34sanfrich:923/4",1939,1939,"1939-05-15","motion","transit",null,"Supervisor Brown reported that a Bay Bridge toll reduction for Exposition-bound traffic could cut the fair's cost, pending a motion by McGowan.","quoted","journalofproceed34sanfrich",923,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed34sanfrich/page/n915",null,"Reduction of Tolls on Bridge for Exposition Bound Traffic.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed34sanfrich:1408/4",1939,1939,"1939-06-12","other","transit",null,"The Public Utilities Committee reported on possibly forming a utilities district to refinance Bay Bridge bonds; no action yet recorded.","quoted","journalofproceed34sanfrich",1408,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed34sanfrich/page/n1398",null,"Report of Public Utilities Committee on Formation of Bay Bridge Utility District.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed34sanfrich:1475/4",1939,1939,"1939-06-26","other",null,null,"Supervisor Uhl called attention to a fatal collision on the Bay Bridge and to a earlier request for traffic separation.","quoted","journalofproceed34sanfrich",1475,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed34sanfrich/page/n1465",null,"Separation of Traffic on Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed35sanfrich:2596/3",1940,1940,"1940-10-14","contract",null,"referred","Agreement with California Toll Bridge Authority to paint the city's pipe line on the Bay Bridge is proposed.","quoted","journalofproceed35sanfrich",2596,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed35sanfrich/page/n2596",null,"Agreement with California Toll Bridge Authority to Paint Pipe Line, San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed35sanfrich:2648/1",1940,1940,"1940-10-21","resolution",null,null,"The Public Utilities Commission would contract with the California Toll Bridge Authority to paint the city's pipe line on the Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed35sanfrich",2648,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed35sanfrich/page/n2648",null,"Agreement With California Toll Bridge Authority to Paint Pipe Line, San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed35sanfrich:2814/2",1940,1940,"1940-11-18","motion",null,"passed","Supervisor Uhl moved that the Governor and Public Works Director again be asked to prevent Bay Bridge accidents; ordered without objection.","quoted","journalofproceed35sanfrich",2814,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed35sanfrich/page/n2814",null,"Prevention of Accidents on San Francisco Bay Bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,2.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed36sanfrich:223/2",1941,1941,"1941-02-03","resolution",null,"referred","Supervisor Ratto's resolution asks state highway officials why Bay Bridge budget requests keep rising; it was referred to Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed36sanfrich",223,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed36sanfrich/page/n220",null,"Consideration of Budgetary Requests for Administration, Operation, Maintenance, etc. of San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. (Series of 1939)",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed36sanfrich|121",1941,1941,"1941-02-03","resolution","public-money","referred","Question over rising Bay Bridge upkeep costs sent to committee","unverified","journalofproceed36sanfrich",223,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed36sanfrich/page/n220",null,"Resolution No as follows: Whereas. There was appropriated for expenditure for administration, maintenance, operation and insurance on the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge during the 1937-1939 biennium. the sum of $600,000, and Whereas, For the same purpose, during the 1939-1941 biennium, there was a",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed36sanfrich:2064/4",1941,1941,"1941-09-15","resolution",null,"referred","Supervisor McSheehy presented a resolution urging reduced Golden Gate Bridge tolls, citing the Bay Bridge's lower toll.","quoted","journalofproceed36sanfrich",2064,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed36sanfrich/page/n2061",null,"Endorsing Reduction in Golden Gate Bridge Tolls (Series of",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:37/3",1947,1943,"1943 and March 1946","finding","study or report",null,"Traffic pattern on the present San Francisco Bay Bridge · finding: Spot checks confirmed the traffic pattern sufficiently for the State's present purpose","unverified","C124921430",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n36",null,"the results of spot checks made in 1943 and in March 1946, considered in conjunction with traffic data on the present bridge",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed38sanfrich:587/6",1943,1943,"1943-03-12","resolution",null,null,"Supervisor Roncovieri presented a resolution mourning engineer John D. Galloway, who advised on Hetch Hetchy and the Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed38sanfrich",587,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed38sanfrich/page/n587",null,"In Memoriam — John D. Galloway. (Series of 1939) Supervisor Roncovieri presented: Resolution No. 3267, as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed40sanfrich:790/3",1945,1945,"1945-04-09","resolution",null,"referred","Proposed agreement with the State on gasoline tax funds for signals at Harrison-Fifth Street and the Bay Bridge approach was referred to Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed40sanfrich",790,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed40sanfrich/page/n790",null,"Authorizing a Supplemental Memorandum of Agreement Re First Gasoline Tax Fund, and Authorizing Chief Administrative Officer and Director of Public Works to Execute Same.",null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed40sanfrich:805/2",1945,1945,"1945-04-16","resolution",null,"passed","The Board adopted a supplemental state highway agreement adding signals and channelization at Harrison-Fifth Street and the Bay Bridge approach.","quoted","journalofproceed40sanfrich",805,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed40sanfrich/page/n805",null,"Authorizing a Supplemental Memorandum of Agreement Re First %(^ Gasoline Tax Fund, and Authorizing Chief Administrative Officer",null,null,"n","a",0,2.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed40part3sanfrich:684/2",1945,1945,"1945-10-01","resolution",null,null,"Supervisor Brown proposed one-way lower-deck traffic on the Bay Bridge during rush hours to relieve congestion.","quoted","journalofproceed40part3sanfrich",684,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed40part3sanfrich/page/n684",null,"Relief of Traffic Congestion, San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed40part3sanfrich:810/4",1945,1945,"1945-10-22","other",null,"referred","Supervisor Mead proposed urging Congress to study a new low-level Bay Bridge; the matter was referred to the Commercial and Industrial Development Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed40part3sanfrich",810,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed40part3sanfrich/page/n810",null,"Proposed New Transbay Bridge. Supervisor Mead called attention to his own experiences with congestion on the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed40part3sanfrich:837/1",1945,1945,"1945-10-29","other",null,"passed","Board approved a committee report recommending separate truck and bus toll gates, bridge traffic stations, and signal lighting on the Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed40part3sanfrich",837,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed40part3sanfrich/page/n837",null,"your Committee's opinion, the toll gates for trucks and buses using the lower deck of the bridge should be segregated",null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed40part3sanfrich:956/1",1945,1945,"1945-11-26","resolution",null,null,"A resolution proposed petitioning the War Department to approve a trans-bay bridge from Hunters Point to Bay Farm Island.","quoted","journalofproceed40part3sanfrich",956,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed40part3sanfrich/page/n956",null,"Proposal No. 5241, Resolution No (Series of 1939), as follows: Whereas, experience during the recent World War has demonstrated",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed412sanfrich:133/2",1946,1946,"1946-01-14","resolution","transit","referred","Proposed $37,500 (≈ $647,962 in 2026 dollars) for a state study of a second San Francisco Bay bridge was re-referred to Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed412sanfrich",133,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed412sanfrich/page/n133",null,"Recommending That Chief Administrative Officer Be Requested to Make $37,500 Available to State Department",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed412sanfrich:336/1",1946,1946,"1946-01-28","other",null,"continued","Action on the $37,500 (≈ $647,962 in 2026 dollars) request to fund a second bay bridge study was postponed until the matter comes before the Board officially.","quoted","journalofproceed412sanfrich",336,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed412sanfrich/page/n336",null,"Consideration of Request by the State Department of Public Works for an Appropriation of $37,500",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed412sanfrich:482/3",1946,1946,"1946-02-18","motion","transit","continued","Supervisor MacPhee proposed $37,500 (≈ $647,962 in 2026 dollars) toward a state study of a second Bay Bridge; consideration put off to March 4.","quoted","journalofproceed412sanfrich",482,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed412sanfrich/page/n482",null,"Appropriation of Funds to Aid in Survey to Determine Need for a Second Bay Bridge Crossing.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed412sanfrich:569/1",1946,1946,"1946-02-25","resolution",null,"passed","Resolution adopted urging the State to widen and realign Sears Point Road and Black Point Cutoff to relieve Bay Bridge traffic.","quoted","journalofproceed412sanfrich",569,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed412sanfrich/page/n569",null,"Approving Widening and Realignment of Sears Point Road and Black Point Cutoff.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed412sanfrich:711/1",1946,1946,"1946-03-11","resolution",null,null,"Board asked the Chief Administrative Officer to provide $37,500 (≈ $647,962 in 2026 dollars) to the state for a second Bay bridge study.","quoted","journalofproceed412sanfrich",711,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed412sanfrich/page/n711",null,"Recommending That Chief Administrative Officer Be Requested to Make $37,500 Available to State Department",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed412sanfrich:713/1",1946,1946,"1946-03-11","resolution","water-sewers",null,"Board petitions War Department to approve plans for studying a trans-bay bridge from Hunters Point to Bay Farm Island.","quoted","journalofproceed412sanfrich",713,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed412sanfrich/page/n713",null,"Petitioning War Department to Approve Plans for Study as to Feasibility of Constructing a Trans-Bay Bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed412sanfrich:714/1",1946,1946,"1946-03-11","resolution",null,"referred","Proposal 5241, urging a Trans-Bay Bridge study, was re-referred to the County, State and National Affairs Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed412sanfrich",714,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed412sanfrich/page/n714",null,"Proposal No. 5241, Resolution No (Series of 1939), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed412sanfrich:873/1",1946,1946,"1946-03-25","resolution","transit","continued","Board considers recommending $37,500 (≈ $647,962 in 2026 dollars) from the Chief Administrative Officer for a State study of a second San Francisco Bay bridge; consideration continued.","quoted","journalofproceed412sanfrich",873,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed412sanfrich/page/n873",null,"Recommending That Chief Administrative Officer Be Requested to Make $37,500 Available to State Department",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed412sanfrich:967/1",1946,1946,"1946-04-01","resolution","transit",null,"Proposed $37,500 (≈ $647,962 in 2026 dollars) from city funds for a state study of a second San Francisco Bay bridge crossing; outcome not yet shown.","quoted","journalofproceed412sanfrich",967,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed412sanfrich/page/n967",null,"Recommending That Chief Administrative Officer Be Requested to Make $37,500 Available to State Department",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed412sanfrich:1365/2",1946,1946,"1946-05-06","resolution",null,null,"Proposal to give the State Department of Public Works $37,500 (≈ $647,962 in 2026 dollars) for a second Bay bridge study was taken up and postponed.","quoted","journalofproceed412sanfrich",1365,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed412sanfrich/page/n1365",null,"Recommending That Chief Administrative Officer Be Requested to Make $37,500 Available to State",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed412sanfrich:1855/2",1946,1946,"1946-05-20","resolution",null,"continued","Board proposed giving the State Department of Public Works $37,500 (≈ $647,962 in 2026 dollars) for a study of a second Bay bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed412sanfrich",1855,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed412sanfrich/page/n1855",null,"Recommending That Chief Administrative Officer Be Requested to Make $37,500 Available to State",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed412sanfrich:2078/2",1946,1946,"1946-06-03","resolution",null,"refused","Board refused to ask the Chief Administrative Officer for $37,500 (≈ $647,962 in 2026 dollars) to fund a state study of a second Bay bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed412sanfrich",2078,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed412sanfrich/page/n2078",null,"Recommending That Chief Administrative Officer Be Requested to Make $37,500 Available to State Department",null,null,"n","a",0,3.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed412sanfrich:2079/1",1946,1946,"1946-06-03","resolution","transit","refused","Request for $37,500 (≈ $647,962 in 2026 dollars) for a state study of a second Bay bridge was refused.","quoted","journalofproceed412sanfrich",2079,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed412sanfrich/page/n2079",null,"Recommending That Chief Administrative Officer Be Requested to Make $37,500 Available to State Department",null,null,"n","a",0,5.9],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed411sanfrich:447/2",1946,1946,"1946-08-19","resolution",null,"continued","Police Committee recommends approving the Toll Bridge Authority's plan to lease land under the Bay Bridge approach for downtown parking.","quoted","journalofproceed411sanfrich",447,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed411sanfrich/page/n446",null,"Approving Plan of the California Toll Bridge Authority to Lease The San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge Approach for Con-",null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed411sanfrich|165",1946,1946,"1946-08-19","resolution","public-money","continued","Parking lots approved under the Bay Bridge approach downtown","unverified","journalofproceed411sanfrich",447,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed411sanfrich/page/n446",null,"Resolution No (Series of 1939), as follows: Whereas, San Francisco through purchase of bonds contributed $390,000 toward the purchase of land along the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge approach from Second to Fifth Streets, and between Perry and Stillman Streets, to protect said approach from any im",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed411sanfrich:515/2",1946,1946,"1946-08-26","resolution",null,"passed","California Toll Bridge Authority proposed leasing the Bay Bridge approach land at Second to Fifth Streets for controlled parking.","quoted","journalofproceed411sanfrich",515,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed411sanfrich/page/n514",null,"Approving Plan of the California Toll Bridge Authority to Lease The San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge Approach for Controlled Parking.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed411sanfrich|192",1946,1946,"1946-08-26","resolution","public-money",null,"Parking lots approved under the Bay Bridge approach downtown","unverified","journalofproceed411sanfrich",515,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed411sanfrich/page/n514",null,"Resolution No. 5780 (Series of 1939), as follows: Whereas, San Francisco through purchase of bonds contributed $390,000 toward the purchase of land along the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge approach from Second to Fifth Streets, and between Perry and Stillman Streets, to protect said approach from ",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed411sanfrich:1098/3",1946,1946,"1946-10-21","resolution",null,"passed","Board adopted a resolution asking the Mayor to appoint a citizens' committee for the Bay Bridge plaque unveiling.","quoted","journalofproceed411sanfrich",1098,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed411sanfrich/page/n1097",null,"Mayor to Appoint Citizens' Committee for Unveiling of Plaque Commemorating the Blessing of San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge by Pope Pius XII.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.8],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:125/2",1947,1947,"","finding","study or report",null,"Joint Army-Navy Board bay crossing foundation survey · finding: suitable materials for bridge piers at comparable depths to present bridge","unverified","C124921430",125,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n124",null,"suitable materials for bridge piers would be reached at comparable depths",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:133/2",1947,1947,"","building","study or report",null,"Existing Bay Bridge · other: removal of interurban tracks from lower deck increases capacity","unverified","C124921430",133,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n132",null,"thereby increasing its capacity by over 1,000 vehicles per hour in each direction.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:133/3",1947,1947,"","finding","study or report",null,"Existing Bay Bridge · finding: initial stage would postpone the date when the existing bridge would again become congested","unverified","C124921430",133,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n132",null,"This would postpone the date when the existing bridge would again become congested",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:15/4",1947,1947,"","building","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · height ft: 214 feet vertical clearance above mean higher high water","unverified","C124921430",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n14",null,"equal to the maximum provided by the existing San Francisco",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:207/1",1947,1947,"","finding","study or report",null,"proposed additional crossing plan · finding: hazards and interference with shipping from lack of maneuvering space","unverified","C124921430",207,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n206",null,"Hazards and interference with shipping would also result from lack of space for maneuvering between the fill, the piers of the Bay Bridge and Yerba Buena Island.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:237/2",1947,1947,"","site","study or report",null,"Existing San Francisco Bay bridge · other: West end of the existing bridge, where a north crossing would discharge close by, with little generated traffic","unverified","C124921430",237,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n236",null,"A north crossing, being common to the existing bridge at its east end and discharging close to the existing bridge at its west end",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:27/1",1947,1947,"","building","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: six lanes (three in each direction) for passenger vehicles on upper deck","unverified","C124921430",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n26",null,"This bridge provides six lanes (three in each direction) for passenger vehicles on its upper deck, and on its lower deck",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:27/2",1947,1947,"","building","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: three lanes for truck and bus traffic on lower deck","unverified","C124921430",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n26",null,"on its lower deck, three lanes for truck and bus traffic through- out most of its length",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:55/4",1947,1947,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: 30 per cent of the present traffic on the Bay Bridge","unverified","C124921430",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n54",null,"30 per cent of the present traffic on the Bay Bridge",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:67/3",1947,1947,"","finding","study or report",null,"Existing Bay Bridge · other: Rail revenues are 8 per cent while rail facilities cost 23 per cent of total bridge cost","unverified","C124921430",67,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n66",null,"They pointed out that rail revenues on the existing bridge are 8 per cent, although rail facilities cost 23 per cent of the total cost of the bridge",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:79/3",1947,1947,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · finding: Prior to construction of the present bridge, about one-third of persons traversing the Bay Bridge were estimated to use mass transportation","unverified","C124921430",79,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n78",null,"it was estimated that about one-third of the persons traversing the Bay Bridge",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:81/1",1947,1947,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · finding: Unexpected and material diversion from interurban trains to private automobiles and buses","unverified","C124921430",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n80",null,"there has been an unexpected and material diversion from interurban trains to private automobiles and buses as indicated in the traffic study",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:81/6",1947,1947,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge traffic predictions · finding: Estimates of total passengers quite accurate; volume by types practically the reverse of predictions","unverified","C124921430",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n80",null,"except for the increased population and activitics resulting from the war, the estimates of total passengers are quite accurate",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:85/1",1947,1947,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: No other bridge, tunnel, ferry or crossing may be built or instituted within ten miles while bridge bonds are outstanding","unverified","C124921430",85,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n84",null,"no other bridge, tunnel, ferry or other crossing shall be built or instituted within ten miles on either side of the present bridge",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:89/1",1947,1947,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · finding: increasing capacity by suspending brackets, reversing lanes, or using lower deck not considered practical","unverified","C124921430",89,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n88",null,"were not considered practical principally because of the design of the distribution structures on both ends of the bridge",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:89/2",1947,1947,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · finding: reversing traffic in off-center lane during rush hours not practical due to uniform two-way traffic volume","unverified","C124921430",89,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n88",null,"the uniformity of the volume of traffic in both directions does not make it practical to reverse the traffic in the off-center lane during rush hours.Ctext 26 words.1 space.2.2s.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.18.19.20.21.22.23.24.25.26 ok",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:89/3",1947,1947,"","measure","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge toll plaza · other: eight toll booths during peak hours in direction of major flow, instead of normal six","unverified","C124921430",89,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n88",null,"During peak hours, eight toll booths in place of the normal six are available to traffic traveling in the direction of major flow.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:89/4",1947,1947,"","project","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge toll plaza · other: additional toll facilities scheduled for construction by the State","unverified","C124921430",89,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n88",null,"Additional toll facilities would relieve congestion at the booths somewhat, and these are scheduled for construction by the State.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:91/2",1947,1947,"","site","study or report",null,"Present Bay Bridge crossing · finding: would again become congested","unverified","C124921430",91,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n90",null,"the present crossing would again become congested, as given in the table below.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:109/3",1947,1947,"1947","finding","study or report",null,"Existing San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · finding: clearances were solely for the free movement of water-borne traffic; aviation was not a factor","unverified","C124921430",109,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n108",null,"All clearances then stipulated were solely for the free movement of water-borne traffic.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:141/1",1947,1947,"1947","project","study or report",null,"Southern dam (bay crossing plan) · proposes: San Francisco terminus of southern dam located just south of the present San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge","unverified","C124921430",141,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n140",null,"The San Francisco terminus of the southern dam would be located just south of the present San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:23/3",1947,1947,"1947","finding","study or report",null,"second crossing near existing Bay bridge · finding: a crossing within 10 miles of the existing Bay bridge would require modification of State statutes","unverified","C124921430",23,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n22",null,"Since any new crossing built within 10 miles of the existing Bay bridge would require modification of the State's statutes",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:231/2",1947,1947,"1947","recommendation","study or report",null,"Subaqueous rapid-transit tube · recommendation: continuous subaqueous tube near the line of the present bridge, rapid-transit only","unverified","C124921430",231,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n230",null,"a continuous subaqueous tube located near the line of the present bridge, designed to carry rapid-transit facilities only, would provide the best crossing",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed42sanfrich:164/2",1947,1947,"1947-01-20","motion","transit","passed","Supervisor Lewis was authorized to travel to Washington, D.C., to press San Francisco's case for a second bay bridge crossing.","quoted","journalofproceed42sanfrich",164,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed42sanfrich/page/n164",null,"Supervisor Mead moved that at the proper time Supervisor Lewis be authorized to proceed to Washington",null,null,"n","a",0,3.15],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed42sanfrich:443/3",1947,1947,"1947-02-24","resolution",null,"referred","Board memorializes state agencies to install a dividing rod on the Bay Bridge; referred to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed42sanfrich",443,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed42sanfrich/page/n443",null,"Dividing Rod for San Francisco- Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed42sanfrich:1448/3",1947,1947,"1947-05-26","resolution",null,"referred","Board petitions the state Toll Bridge Authority to open land under the Bay Bridge's west end for parking.","quoted","journalofproceed42sanfrich",1448,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed42sanfrich/page/n1448",null,"Petitioning the California Toll Bridge Authority to Make Available for Parking Purposes That Land Under the Westerly End",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed42sanfrich|348",1947,1947,"1947-05-26","resolution","getting-around",null,"Parking sought again under the Bay Bridge between Second and Fourth","unverified","journalofproceed42sanfrich",1448,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed42sanfrich/page/n1448",null,"Resolution No (Series of 1939), as follows: Whereas, the land under the westerly end of the San Francisco- Oakland Bay Bridge, between Fourth and Second streets, is exceptionally suitable for automobile parking; and Whereas, prior to World War II, the State of California permitted motorists to park ",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed42sanfrich:1668/2",1947,1947,"1947-06-30","resolution",null,"referred","A petition asks the state toll bridge authority to open land under the Bay Bridge's west end for parking.","quoted","journalofproceed42sanfrich",1668,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed42sanfrich/page/n1668",null,"Petitioning the California Toll Bridge Authority to Make Available for Parking Purposes that Land Under the Westerly End",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed42sanfrich|430",1947,1947,"1947-06-30","resolution","getting-around",null,"Parking sought again under the Bay Bridge between Second and Fourth","unverified","journalofproceed42sanfrich",1668,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed42sanfrich/page/n1668",null,"Resolution No. 6660 (Series of 1939), as follows: Whereas, the land under the westerly end of the San Francisco- Oakland Bay Bridge, between Fourth and Second Streets, is exceptionally suitable for automobile parking; and Whereas, prior to World War II, the State of California permitted motorists to",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed42sanfrich:2063/1",1947,1947,"1947-10-27","motion",null,"passed","Board instructed the City Attorney to investigate legal options to stop a second Bay bridge next to the existing one.","quoted","journalofproceed42sanfrich",2063,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed42sanfrich/page/n2063",null,"Motion re Second Bay Crossing — Carried. Supervisor Christopher moved, seconded by Supervisor Mead, that Board instruct",null,null,"n","a",0,3.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:33/2",1947,1947,"August 1930","recommendation","study or report",null,"Hoover-Young San Francisco Bay Bridge Commission report · recommendation: Location #4 via Yerba Buena Island to Oakland over the Key Route Mole be adopted","unverified","C124921430",33,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n32",null,"Location #4 from the Rincon Hill District in San Francisco via Yerba Buena Island to Oakland over the Key Route Mole be adopted",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:37/2",1947,1947,"January 1, 1947","event","study or report",null,"State study of an additional San Francisco Bay bridge · event: State studies not completed until about January 1, 1947","unverified","C124921430",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n36",null,"the State's studies would not be completed until about January 1, 1947.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:81/3",1947,1947,"January 1941","event","study or report",null,"Southern Pacific electric trains · event: Curtailed operations; substantially stopped electric train operations over the bridge by July 1941","unverified","C124921430",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n80",null,"The Southern Pacific lines started curtailing their operations in January 1941 and by July 1941 had substantially stopped operations of electric trains over the bridge.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:81/4",1947,1947,"July 1941","event","study or report",null,"Sacramento Northern electric trains · event: Ceased operations over the bridge","unverified","C124921430",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n80",null,"The Sacramento Northern ceased their operations in July 1941",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:81/5",1947,1947,"July 1941","event","study or report",null,"Key System H line · event: Key System curtailed operations on the H line","unverified","C124921430",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n80",null,"during that same month, the Key System curtailed operations on one of their lines, the \"H\" line.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:37/1",1947,1947,"October 30, 1945","event","study or report",null,"State study of an additional San Francisco Bay bridge · lead agency: Department of Public Works (State), directed by California State Toll Bridge Authority","unverified","C124921430",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n36",null,"Under date of October 30, 1945, the California State Toll Bridge Authority directed the Department of Public Works",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed43sanfrich:953/3",1948,1948,"1948-11-22","resolution",null,"referred","A resolution asking the City Attorney to prepare legal action against any parallel Bay Bridge was referred to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed43sanfrich",953,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed43sanfrich/page/n948",null,"Requesting City Attorney to Be Prepared to Institute Legal Proceedings and to Explore Fully Available Legal Remedies in Connection With",null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed44sanfrich:295/2",1949,1949,"1949-04-11","resolution",null,"passed","Resolution adopted asking the Mayor to gather data and authorizing the City Attorney to back a Bay Bridge traffic suit.","quoted","journalofproceed44sanfrich",295,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed44sanfrich/page/n292",null,"Requesting Mayor to Obtain Data, and Authorizing City Attorney to Represent the City",null,null,"n","a",0,3.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed44sanfrich:377/5",1949,1949,"1949-05-09","motion",null,"referred","Supervisor Lewis's motion asking the City Attorney to report on blocking state funds for a parallel bay bridge was sent back to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed44sanfrich",377,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed44sanfrich/page/n374",null,"That the City Attorney report on possible legal proceedings to prevent expenditures of state funds looking to the construction of a parallel bay bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed44sanfrich:1008/2",1949,1949,"1949-10-31","resolution","transit","passed","Board urged the State Department of Public Works to build additional approaches to the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed44sanfrich",1008,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed44sanfrich/page/n1005",null,"Memorializing ihe State Department of Public Works to Immediately Undertake a Program to Construct Additional",null,null,"n","a",0,6.78],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed44sanfrich:1022/2",1949,1949,"1949-11-07","resolution","transit","continued","Mayor vetoed File 4859, a resolution urging the State Public Works Department to build more San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge approaches.","quoted","journalofproceed44sanfrich",1022,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed44sanfrich/page/n1019",null,"Memorializing the State Department of Public Works to Immediately Undertake a Program to Construct Additional Approaches",null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed44sanfrich:1048/2",1949,1949,"1949-11-21","resolution",null,"vetoed","Mayor's veto sustained, so the resolution urging state work on more San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge approaches failed.","quoted","journalofproceed44sanfrich",1048,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed44sanfrich/page/n1045",null,"Memorializing the State Department of Public Works to Immediately Undertake a Program to Construct Additional Approaches",null,null,"n","a",0,6.12],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744965:83/1",1950,1950,"","site","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: within the survey area; not an external station; trans-bay traffic treated as external","unverified","C101744965",83,"https://archive.org/details/C101744965/page/n82",null,"The San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge being within the survey area was not an external station",null,"Transportation planning for San Francisco : a report on the planning procedure and planning and engineering techniques utilized in preparation of the San Francisco long-range circulation plan, 1946-1948","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed45sanfrich:158/3",1950,1950,"1950-02-14","motion",null,"referred","Supervisor Lewis asked officials to meet on new Bay Bridge approaches; referred to Streets Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed45sanfrich",158,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed45sanfrich/page/n155",null,"Request of Supervisor Lewis Re Approaches to the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed45sanfrich:171/3",1950,1950,"1950-02-20","motion",null,null,"Lewis moves that city officials meet with Alameda County and state officials on Bay Bridge approaches.","quoted","journalofproceed45sanfrich",171,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed45sanfrich/page/n168",null,"Discussion Re Bridge Approaches.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed45sanfrich:213/2",1950,1950,"1950-03-06","motion",null,"withdrawn","MacPhee withdrew his motion to hold a committee-of-the-whole hearing on Bay Bridge approaches.","quoted","journalofproceed45sanfrich",213,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed45sanfrich/page/n210",null,"Motion to Sit as Committee of the Whole Re Discussion of Bay Bridge Approaches.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C055308255:105/1",1951,1951,"","project","study or report",null,"South Barrier · other: to be built first, to relieve traffic congestion on the East Bay Bridge","unverified","C055308255",105,"https://archive.org/details/C055308255/page/n104",null,"In this case, the South Barrier uid be built first, to relieve traffic congestion on the East Bay Bridge.",null,"Report on development of the San Francisco Bay region, prepared for the Fact-Finding Committee of the California Assembly on Tidelands Reclamation and Development, Related Traffic Problems and Relief of Congestion on Transbay Crossings,","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C055308255:109/1",1951,1951,"","finding","study or report",null,"Combined capacity of South Barrier crossing and San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: from 17,000,000 to 53,000,000 vehicles annually","unverified","C055308255",109,"https://archive.org/details/C055308255/page/n108",null,"Thus the sombined capacity of the South Barrier tossing and the bridge would be from 17,000,000 to 53,000,000 velioies ann naliy.",null,"Report on development of the San Francisco Bay region, prepared for the Fact-Finding Committee of the California Assembly on Tidelands Reclamation and Development, Related Traffic Problems and Relief of Congestion on Transbay Crossings,","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C055308255:275/1",1951,1951,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: Traffic density shown as a percentage of San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge traffic","unverified","C055308255",275,"https://archive.org/details/C055308255/page/n274",null,"Traffic density shown as a percentage of San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge traffic",null,"Report on development of the San Francisco Bay region, prepared for the Fact-Finding Committee of the California Assembly on Tidelands Reclamation and Development, Related Traffic Problems and Relief of Congestion on Transbay Crossings,","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C055308255:57/1",1951,1951,"","building","study or report",null,"East Bay Bridge · other: carries about 95% of its estimated traffic capacity; six traffic lanes on upper deck, three traffic lanes and two interurban railway tracks on lower deck","unverified","C055308255",57,"https://archive.org/details/C055308255/page/n56",null,"now carries about 95% of ite estimated traffic capacity",null,"Report on development of the San Francisco Bay region, prepared for the Fact-Finding Committee of the California Assembly on Tidelands Reclamation and Development, Related Traffic Problems and Relief of Congestion on Transbay Crossings,","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C055308255:71/1",1951,1951,"","measure","study or report",null,"Reber Plan (as modified) · other: Relocation of the ship channel to permit continued use of the existing Bay Bridge","unverified","C055308255",71,"https://archive.org/details/C055308255/page/n70",null,"Relocation of the ship channal ts permit the continued use of the existing Bay Bridge.",null,"Report on development of the San Francisco Bay region, prepared for the Fact-Finding Committee of the California Assembly on Tidelands Reclamation and Development, Related Traffic Problems and Relief of Congestion on Transbay Crossings,","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed46sanfrich:653/1",1951,1951,"1951-06-04","resolution","transit","referred","Resolution asking the State Legislature and agencies to study a monorail on the Bay Bridge was referred to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed46sanfrich",653,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed46sanfrich/page/n653",null,"Memorializing the State Legislature and Other Agencies to Undertake Study and Investigation into the Feasibility of Using Monorail",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed46sanfrich:714/2",1951,1951,"1951-06-18","resolution",null,"referred","A proposed uniform city position on the financial matters of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge was referred to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed46sanfrich",714,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed46sanfrich/page/n714",null,"Providing for an Official and Uniform Position of the City and County in Regards to Matters Affecting the Financial Aspects",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed46sanfrich:1183/3",1951,1951,"1951-12-03","other",null,"referred","Supervisor Fazackerley's request for a city policy on Bay Bridge refinancing was referred to committee for study.","quoted","journalofproceed46sanfrich",1183,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed46sanfrich/page/n1183",null,"Request of Supervisor Fazackerley Concerning City Policy on Bridge Refinancing",null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed46sanfrich|853",1951,1951,"1951-12-03","motion","running-the-city","passed","Bay bridge refinancing policy sent to committee for study","unverified","journalofproceed46sanfrich",1183,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed46sanfrich/page/n1183",null,"Motion to Adopt. Supervisor Fazackerley moved, seconded by Supervisor Mead, that the foregoing measure be adopted. Adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Supervisors Arnold, Christopher, Fazackerley, Lewis, Mc- Murray, Mead, John J. Sullivan — 7. Absent: Supervisors Gallagher, MacPhee, Mancuso, J. Jos",null,null,"n","a",0,1.54],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed46sanfrich:1204/1",1951,1951,"1951-12-10","motion",null,"refused","Motion to hold a special Board meeting on December 12 to set a policy on refinancing the Bay Bridge lost.","quoted","journalofproceed46sanfrich",1204,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed46sanfrich/page/n1204",null,"Motion to Fix Special Order of Business.",null,null,"n","a",0,4.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed47sanfrich:375/2",1952,1952,"1952-04-28","resolution","transit",null,"Supervisor Lewis presented a resolution opposing additional Bay Bridge bonded debt except for financing a southern bay crossing.","quoted","journalofproceed47sanfrich",375,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed47sanfrich/page/n372",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed47sanfrich:382/5",1952,1952,"1952-04-28","resolution",null,null,"Board debated a resolution opposing $50 million (≈ $635.7 million in 2026 dollars) more Bay Bridge bonds; Supervisor MacPhee wanted it strengthened, outcome pending.","quoted","journalofproceed47sanfrich",382,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed47sanfrich/page/n379",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed47sanfrich:390/4",1952,1952,"1952-04-28","resolution",null,"passed","The Board adopted a resolution opposing additional Bay Bridge bonded debt unless it finances a southern bay crossing.","quoted","journalofproceed47sanfrich",390,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed47sanfrich/page/n387",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed47sanfrich:972/3",1952,1952,"1952-11-03","resolution","transit","referred","Lewis's resolution opposing removal of [name withheld] tracks from the lower level of the Bay Bridge was referred to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed47sanfrich",972,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed47sanfrich/page/n969",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed47sanfrich:988/3",1952,1952,"1952-11-10","resolution","transit","passed","The Board opposed Key System plan to replace A and B line trains on the Bay Bridge lower level with buses.","quoted","journalofproceed47sanfrich",988,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed47sanfrich/page/n985",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.4],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:47/4",1947,1953,"1953","finding","study or report",null,"existing bay bridge · other: would be paid for by 1953","unverified","C124921430",47,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n46",null,"indicated that the existing bridge would be paid for by 1953 (26)",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:39/3",1953,1953,"1953-01-12","resolution",null,"referred","The Board referred a resolution opposing an end to Bay Bridge tolls to the County, State and National Affairs Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",39,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n39",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:294/1",1953,1953,"1953-04-06","resolution",null,"continued","Supervisor Lewis proposed urging the Toll Bridge Authority to speed traffic on the Bay Bridge; debate set for April 13.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",294,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n294",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:302/1",1953,1953,"1953-04-13","resolution",null,"continued","Consideration of a resolution urging the California Toll Bridge Authority to study ways to speed Bay Bridge traffic was temporarily postponed.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",302,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n302",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:307/2",1953,1953,"1953-04-13","resolution",null,"referred","Resolution urging the Toll Bridge Authority to expedite Bay Bridge traffic was referred to the County, State and National Affairs Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",307,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n307",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:338/1",1953,1953,"1953-04-20","resolution",null,"referred","Proposed Bay Bridge toll reduction sent to the Finance Committee after objections blocked immediate action.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",338,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n338",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:507/1",1953,1953,"1953-06-08","resolution",null,"passed","Board adopted a resolution recommending Congress amend Public Law 695 to allow continued Bay Bridge tolls.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",507,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n507",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:548/2",1953,1953,"1953-06-15","other",null,null,"Measure urging the Toll Bridge Authority to improve Bay Bridge traffic flow was moved from committee to the June 22 calendar.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",548,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n548",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:560/2",1953,1953,"1953-06-22","resolution",null,"passed","Board adopted a resolution urging the California Toll Bridge Authority to consider ways to speed traffic on the Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",560,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n560",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:561/1",1953,1953,"1953-06-22","resolution",null,"passed","Resolution adopted urging the state Toll Bridge Authority to consider traffic-safety suggestions for the Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",561,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n561",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:610/1",1953,1953,"1953-07-08","resolution",null,null,"Board debates a resolution backing federal amendments to the Consent Statute so Bay Bridge tolls can fund the Southern Crossing.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",610,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n610",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:612/1",1953,1953,"1953-07-08","resolution",null,null,"Board proposes conditional support for state bill S.B. 2289 on Bay Bridge tolls, if amended as the city's delegation recommends.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",612,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n612",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:614/1",1953,1953,"1953-07-09","resolution",null,"passed","Board adopted a resolution declaring policy on federal bill S.B. 2289 concerning Bay Bridge tolls, repealing Resolution 13505.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",614,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n614",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:614/2",1953,1953,"1953-07-09","resolution",null,null,"Board debated a proposed resolution on Bay Bridge toll collection under the federal consent statute; no final vote yet.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",614,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n614",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:615/1",1953,1953,"1953-07-09","resolution",null,null,"Resolution proposed to extend Bay Bridge tolls and back federal legislation on up to two new crossings; vote continues on the next page.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",615,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n615",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed49sanfrich:802/5",1954,1954,"1954-09-07","resolution","transit","passed","The Board adopted a resolution asking the Mayor to seek assurance that rails on the San Francisco Bay Bridge will not be abandoned.","quoted","journalofproceed49sanfrich",802,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed49sanfrich/page/n801",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.4],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed49sanfrich:803/1",1954,1954,"1954-09-07","resolution","transit","referred","Resolution asking the Mayor to appoint a committee to arrange East Bay talks on a Bay Bridge rail plan was referred to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed49sanfrich",803,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed49sanfrich/page/n802",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed50sanfrich:296/3",1955,1955,"1955-04-25","resolution","health","passed","Committee recommends approving state bills AB 146 on hospital construction funding and AB 1419 on Bay Bridge rails.","quoted","journalofproceed50sanfrich",296,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed50sanfrich/page/n295",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed50sanfrich:297/2",1955,1955,"1955-04-25","other","transit","passed","Board adopted its approval of AB 1419, a state bill to keep rails on the Bay Bridge until mass transit planning is complete.","quoted","journalofproceed50sanfrich",297,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed50sanfrich/page/n296",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.4],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878417:64/1",1956,1956,"","building","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: revenue above maintenance and operating expenses about 9 million dollars a year, pledged to support bonds for additional Bay crossings","unverified","C124878417",64,"https://archive.org/details/C124878417/page/n63",null,null,null,"Organizational and financial aspects of the proposed San Francisco Bay Area rapid transit system","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878417:98/1",1956,1956,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: Bridge tolls not available for rapid transit unless federal statute is amended","unverified","C124878417",98,"https://archive.org/details/C124878417/page/n97",null,null,null,"Organizational and financial aspects of the proposed San Francisco Bay Area rapid transit system","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878417:98/4",1956,1956,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: All bonds of the bridge have been retired","unverified","C124878417",98,"https://archive.org/details/C124878417/page/n97",null,null,null,"Organizational and financial aspects of the proposed San Francisco Bay Area rapid transit system","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878417:99/1",1956,1956,"","building","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: transfer to rapid transit district would permit change in management of the bridge","unverified","C124878417",99,"https://archive.org/details/C124878417/page/n98",null,null,null,"Organizational and financial aspects of the proposed San Francisco Bay Area rapid transit system","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878417:86/4",1956,1956,"1956","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland bay bridge tolls · recommendation: tolls of the San Francisco-Oakland bridge might support the transit program","unverified","C124878417",86,"https://archive.org/details/C124878417/page/n85",null,null,null,"Organizational and financial aspects of the proposed San Francisco Bay Area rapid transit system","n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed51sanfrich:201/2",1956,1956,"1956-03-19","resolution",null,"passed","The Board adopted a resolution backing A.B. 51, a state bill on toll bridges and approaches to the Southern Crossing of the Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed51sanfrich",201,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed51sanfrich/page/n200",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed51sanfrich:375/2",1956,1956,"1956-05-28","resolution","transit","passed","Resolution opposing removal of Bay Bridge trains if motor coaches would add buses on San Francisco streets was adopted.","quoted","journalofproceed51sanfrich",375,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed51sanfrich/page/n374",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.53],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed51sanfrich:375/3",1956,1956,"1956-05-28","resolution","transit","passed","Resolution opposing use of Bay Bridge funds dedicated to the southern crossing for other purposes was adopted.","quoted","journalofproceed51sanfrich",375,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed51sanfrich/page/n374",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.4],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124886280:123/4",1957,1957,"1957","finding","plan",null,"Bayshore Freeway, Bay Bridge and Embarcadero Freeway blocks · finding: industrial buildings built and residential uses almost entirely displaced","unverified","C124886280",123,"https://archive.org/details/C124886280/page/n122","Bayshore Freeway",null,null,"A preliminary plan for a project in the South of Market Redevelopment Area \"D\" : report to the City Planning Commission and the Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:92/1",2000,1957,"1957","event","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · event: Design specification for rail removal","unverified","C124925065",92,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n91",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed52sanfrich:337/1",1957,1957,"1957-05-13","motion","transit","referred","Supervisor Halley asked the Public Utilities Commission to study city streetcars on the Bay Bridge; sent to Streets Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed52sanfrich",337,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed52sanfrich/page/n336",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed52sanfrich:396/2",1957,1957,"1957-05-23","resolution","transit",null,"Board considered a resolution reaffirming its position on state bill AB 3370 and keeping Bay Bridge rails; consideration was postponed.","quoted","journalofproceed52sanfrich",396,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed52sanfrich/page/n395",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed52sanfrich:397/3",1957,1957,"1957-05-23","resolution","transit","passed","A resolution declaring the city's position on a state bill for the Southern Crossing and Bay Bridge rails was adopted as amended.","quoted","journalofproceed52sanfrich",397,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed52sanfrich/page/n396",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.4],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed52sanfrich:949/5",1957,1957,"1957-12-16","communication","transit","referred","A proposed resolution opposing abandonment of Bay Bridge rail service was referred to the County, State and National Affairs Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed52sanfrich",949,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed52sanfrich/page/n946",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed52sanfrich:960/1",1957,1957,"1957-12-23","resolution","transit","passed","Resolution urging the State to defer removing Bay Bridge rails until rapid transit plans are submitted.","quoted","journalofproceed52sanfrich",960,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed52sanfrich/page/n957",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.15],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:59/1",1984,1958,"1958","event","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge lower deck (Key System tracks) · other: Key System train tracks removed from lower deck to accommodate more vehicular traffic","unverified","C124877529",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n58",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:105/4",1984,1958,"1958","event","ordinance or legislation",null,"Bay Bridge lower deck · other: interurban rail tracks removed to increase automobile capacity","unverified","C124887761",105,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n104",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:143/3",1983,1958,"1958","event","plan",null,"Bay Bridge lower deck · event: Interurban rail tracks removed to increase automobile capacity","unverified","c124897620",143,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n142","Bay Bridge",null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed53sanfrich:276/3",1958,1958,"1958-04-21","motion","transit","passed","The Clerk was directed to ask the Police Department to watch traffic near the Bay Bridge Terminal from [name withheld] buses.","quoted","journalofproceed53sanfrich",276,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed53sanfrich/page/n276",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.78],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:17/2",1977,1959,"1959","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel traffic counts · other: Institute of Transportation Studies has conducted semiannual traffic counts at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel since 1959","unverified","C124901922",17,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n16",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:15/1",2000,1959,"1959","event","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge west spans · event: Rail on the west spans","unverified","C124925065",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n14",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:6/1",2000,1959,"1959","building","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: converted to ten lanes of auto operations (five in each direction)","unverified","C124925065",6,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n5",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:92/2",2000,1959,"1959 through 1963","event","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · event: Reconstruction 1959 through 1963; structural capacity calculations 1965 and 1967","unverified","C124925065",92,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n91",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877626:7/1",1961,1960,"1960","site","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: More than 37 million vehicles passed over","unverified","C124877626",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124877626/page/n6","San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge",null,null,"Final report on the feasibility of a regional agency to coordinate transportation facilities serving the people of a nine-county metropolitan region with recommendations for a Golden Gate Transportation Commission for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877626:12/3",1961,1961,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge and other State-owned Bay Area bridges · recommendation: Transfer to the Golden Gate Transportation Commission","unverified","C124877626",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124877626/page/n11",null,null,null,"Final report on the feasibility of a regional agency to coordinate transportation facilities serving the people of a nine-county metropolitan region with recommendations for a Golden Gate Transportation Commission for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877626:23/5",1961,1961,"","property_record","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · lead agency: State Department of Public Works","unverified","C124877626",23,"https://archive.org/details/C124877626/page/n22",null,null,null,"Final report on the feasibility of a regional agency to coordinate transportation facilities serving the people of a nine-county metropolitan region with recommendations for a Golden Gate Transportation Commission for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed56sanfrich:301/1",1961,1961,"1961-05-15","resolution","transit","continued","Supervisor Ferdon's motion postponed consideration of a state bill on Bay Bridge revenues so an amendment could be drafted.","quoted","journalofproceed56sanfrich",301,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed56sanfrich/page/n300",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed56sanfrich:302/6",1961,1961,"1961-05-15","resolution",null,"passed","The Board adopted, as amended, a resolution recommending state bill SB 1016 on Bay Bridge revenues for the San Mateo-Hayward Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed56sanfrich",302,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed56sanfrich/page/n301",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed56sanfrich:303/1",1961,1961,"1961-05-15","resolution","transit","passed","The Board recommended state bill SB 1016 to use Bay Bridge tolls for the San Mateo-Hayward Bridge, with amendments setting priorities for other crossings.","quoted","journalofproceed56sanfrich",303,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed56sanfrich/page/n302",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.28],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed56sanfrich|g566",1961,1961,"1961-05-15",null,"transport","pending","State bill on bridge toll money put off for later.","unverified","journalofproceed56sanfrich",301,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed56sanfrich/page/n300",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed56sanfrich|g569",1961,1961,"1961-05-15",null,"transport","passed","City backed state bill using Bay Bridge tolls for other crossings","unverified","journalofproceed56sanfrich",303,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed56sanfrich/page/n302",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-0.97],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:14/2",2000,1963,"1963","building","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: converted from mixed use with rail to vehicle traffic only","unverified","C124925065",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n13","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:14/3",2000,1963,"1963","building","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: rail systems removed; lower deck replaced with precast concrete slab","unverified","C124925065",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n13","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed58sanfrich:245/5",1963,1963,"1963-05-06","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","An ordinance to eliminate the westerly crosswalk at Fremont Street by the Bay Bridge off-ramp passed first reading.","quoted","journalofproceed58sanfrich",245,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed58sanfrich/page/n244",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed58sanfrich:246/1",1963,1963,"1963-05-06","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Supervisors passed on first reading an ordinance eliminating the westerly crosswalk at Fremont Street under the Bay Bridge off-ramp.","quoted","journalofproceed58sanfrich",246,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed58sanfrich/page/n245",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed58sanfrich:257/2",1963,1963,"1963-05-13","ordinance",null,"passed","The westerly crosswalk at Fremont Street across the Bay Bridge off-ramp was eliminated by ordinance.","quoted","journalofproceed58sanfrich",257,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed58sanfrich/page/n256",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed58sanfrich|g472",1963,1963,"1963-05-13","ordinance","traffic","passed","Westerly crosswalk at Fremont Street Bay Bridge off-ramp removed","quoted","journalofproceed58sanfrich",257,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed58sanfrich/page/n256",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.99],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed59sanfrich|g1205",1964,1964,"1964-09-28",null,"transport","pending","Call for a southern Bay bridge at [name withheld] put off.","unverified","journalofproceed59sanfrich",793,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed59sanfrich/page/n790",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed59sanfrich|g1216",1964,1964,"1964-09-28",null,"transport","pending","Call for a southern Bay bridge at [name withheld] sent to committee.","unverified","journalofproceed59sanfrich",797,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed59sanfrich/page/n794",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:11/4",1977,1965,"1965","event","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge traffic study · other: traffic crossing San Francisco Bay collected semiannually","unverified","C124901922",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n10",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:22/10001",1977,1965,"1965","site","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: traffic counts used since 1965","unverified","C124901922",22,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n21",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed60sanfrich|g104",1965,1965,"1965-02-01",null,"transport","passed","Supervisors urged a southern Bay bridge from [name withheld]","unverified","journalofproceed60sanfrich",67,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed60sanfrich/page/n66",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.03],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed60sanfrich|g105",1965,1965,"1965-02-01",null,"transport","pending","[name withheld] bay bridge request put on hold.","unverified","journalofproceed60sanfrich",67,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed60sanfrich/page/n66",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed60sanfrich:398/3",1965,1965,"1965-06-14","resolution","transit","passed","Board adopted Transportation Committee recommendations urging enactment of several pending state bills, including scenic easements and Bay Bridge rates.","quoted","journalofproceed60sanfrich",398,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed60sanfrich/page/n397",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.03],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124892897:25/16",1975,1965,"1965-1973","site","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: 133,000 to 184,000 vehicles daily","unverified","c124892897",25,"https://archive.org/details/c124892897/page/n24","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Parking in San Francisco : recommendations for policies and implementation actions : a report to the San Francisco City Planning Department","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:42/1",1977,1965,"1965-1975","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge eastbound afternoon peak traffic · other: Figure 5 charts 3-hour PM peak eastbound vehicle volume across the Bay Bridge, calendar years 1965 to 1975, on an axis from 18000 to 29200 vehicles","unverified","C124901922",42,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n41","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:33/1",1977,1965,"1965-1977","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge 24-hour vehicle traffic · other: regression trend line of 24-hour vehicle volume crossing the Bay Bridge, all data 1965-1977","unverified","C124901922",33,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n32",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:40/1",1977,1965,"1965-1977","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: Trends in total 24-hour vehicle traffic across the Bay Bridge, calendar years 1965-1977 (Figure 3)","unverified","C124901922",40,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n39",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:43/1",1977,1965,"1965-1977","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: Midday total vehicle volume (0900-1600) trends across the Bay Bridge, 1965-1977, shown in Figure 6","unverified","C124901922",43,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n42",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:44/1",1977,1965,"1965-1977","measure","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge transit passenger volume · other: Trends in total 24-hour transbay transit passenger travel, 1965-1977 (Figure 7)","unverified","C124901922",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n43","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:45/1",1977,1965,"1965-1977","finding","study or report",null,"Transbay transit passenger travel, westbound morning peak period · other: Trends in westbound morning peak period Transbay transit passenger travel, 1965-1977 (chart, no values printed)","unverified","C124901922",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n44","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:46/1",1977,1965,"1965-1977","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge eastbound afternoon peak transit passenger travel · other: Trends in eastbound afternoon peak period transbay transit passenger travel, 1965-1977 (Figure 9); chart axis 14000 to 32400 passengers","unverified","C124901922",46,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n45",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:47/1",1977,1965,"1965-1977","site","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge transbay transit passenger travel · other: Trends in total transbay transit passenger travel between 0900 and 1600, calendar years 1965 to 1977 (Figure 10)","unverified","C124901922",47,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n46","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:15/2",2000,1965,"1965/67","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge west spans · other: Lane load derived from 1965/67 Caltrans study placing live load from all 10 lanes","unverified","C124925065",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n14",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:15/3",2000,1965,"1965/67","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge west spans · finding: West span structural demands under proposed lane and rail loads established by proportioning 1965/67 values","unverified","C124925065",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n14",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124886703:195/3",1966,1966,"","project","ordinance or legislation",null,"Rapid transit tube engineering work · cost usd: $750,000 from Revenue Fund of San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge","unverified","C124886703",195,"https://archive.org/details/C124886703/page/n194",null,null,null,"San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Act and other important statutes.","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124886703:203/1",1966,1966,"","measure","ordinance or legislation",null,"Rapid transit tube, San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: Annual tolls and revenues of the Bay Bridge pledged to finance construction of the rapid transit tube","unverified","C124886703",203,"https://archive.org/details/C124886703/page/n202",null,null,null,"San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Act and other important statutes.","n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed62sanfrich:668/2",1967,1967,"1967-07-17","resolution","transit","passed","Board adopted a resolution favoring state bill SB 775, raising Bay Bridge tolls to fund Bay Area rapid transit.","quoted","journalofproceed62sanfrich",668,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed62sanfrich/page/n667",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,5.83],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed63sanfrich:538/2",1968,1968,"1968-06-03","resolution",null,"passed","Board adopted a resolution authorizing a quitclaim deed to the State of vacated portions of First, Rincon, and Sterling Streets for the Bay Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed63sanfrich",538,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed63sanfrich/page/n533",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed63sanfrich|g1690",1968,1968,"1968-09-30","ordinance","admin","pending","Lawsuit settlement with Bay Bridge Garage awaits final vote","quoted","journalofproceed63sanfrich",875,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed63sanfrich/page/n870",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed63sanfrich:888/1",1968,1968,"1968-10-07","ordinance",null,"passed","Board of Supervisors passed settlement of city lawsuit against Bay Bridge Garage and [name withheld] for $3,583.33 (≈ $34,694 in 2026 dollars).","quoted","journalofproceed63sanfrich",888,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed63sanfrich/page/n883",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed63sanfrich|g1714",1968,1968,"1968-10-07","ordinance","admin","passed","City accepts $3,583 (≈ $34,691 in 2026 dollars) settlement in Bay Bridge Garage lawsuit","quoted","journalofproceed63sanfrich",888,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed63sanfrich/page/n883",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.45],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697043:151/1",1969,1969,"","finding","study or report",null,"Ports south of the Bay Bridge · finding: Not designated for large bulk carriers with drafts more than 50 feet","unverified","C101697043",151,"https://archive.org/details/C101697043/page/n150",null,null,null,"Preliminary plan of study of San Francisco Bay area in-depth study : Appendix B : Coordination activities and comments from others","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697043:151/2",1969,1969,"","finding","study or report",null,"Ports south of the Bay Bridge · finding: Channel requirements not expected to exceed a 50 foot channel for the foreseeable future","unverified","C101697043",151,"https://archive.org/details/C101697043/page/n150",null,null,null,"Preliminary plan of study of San Francisco Bay area in-depth study : Appendix B : Coordination activities and comments from others","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:191/10001",1970,1969,"1969","measure","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: peak hour handles 11.6% of the peak-period traffic; bridge carries more than 5,400 cars/hour (three lanes) for only two hours of the day in each direction","unverified","C124878408",191,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n190",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:21/3",1977,1969,"1969 (September)","event","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge one-way toll collection · event: start of one-way toll collection","unverified","C124901922",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n20",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed64sanfrich|g272",1969,1969,"1969-02-10","resolution","transport","pending","Higher Bay Bridge tolls for BART funding sent to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed64sanfrich",148,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed64sanfrich/page/n148",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:178/2",1970,1970,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · finding: car pool experiment by the Bay Bridge was totally unsuccessful","unverified","C124878408",178,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n177",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:182/1",1970,1970,"","site","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge Toll Plaza · other: exclusive lane for buses established","unverified","C124878408",182,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n181",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:183/2",1970,1970,"","project","study or report",null,"BARTD (Bay Area Rapid Transit District) · other: Seated capacity of 30,000 people per hour, exceeding present hourly peak flow across the Bay Bridge by 25%","unverified","C124878408",183,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n182",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:193/1",1970,1970,"","site","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: five lanes","unverified","C124878408",193,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n192",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:193/2",1970,1970,"","site","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: carries nearly twice as many people in the peak hour as the Golden Gate Bridge","unverified","C124878408",193,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n192",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:194/1",1970,1970,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · finding: almost half of peak hour travel is by bus, compared to less than 10% during midday hours","unverified","C124878408",194,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n193","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:194/2",1970,1970,"","finding","study or report",null,"Golden Gate Bridge and Bay Bridge capacity · finding: increasing average bus occupancy from 35 to 65 does not significantly increase bridge capacity; automobile occupancy increase from about 1.5 to 2.5 raises capacity by at least 20%","unverified","C124878408",194,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n193",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:181/1",1970,1970,"1970","recommendation","study or report",null,"Golden Gate and Bay Bridge · recommendation: introduction of a variable toll structure charging different tolls by time of day and direction of travel","unverified","C124878301",181,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n180",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed65sanfrich:293/3",1970,1970,"1970-04-06","ordinance","whats-being-built","passed first reading","Proposed zoning map changes and special height and use districts covering an area from Fort Mason to the Bay Bridge passed for second reading.","quoted","journalofproceed65sanfrich",293,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed65sanfrich/page/n292",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed65sanfrich:854/4",1970,1970,"1970-09-14","ballot_measure","whats-being-built","referred","Supervisor Feinstein proposed putting a 175-foot waterfront height limit between Bay Bridge and Ferry Building to voters.","quoted","journalofproceed65sanfrich",854,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed65sanfrich/page/n853",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed65sanfrich:1012/4",1970,1970,"1970-11-16","ordinance","whats-being-built","continued","A zoning map change for the Embarcadero waterfront area near Howard Street and the Bay Bridge is proposed; the outcome is not yet shown.","quoted","journalofproceed65sanfrich",1012,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed65sanfrich/page/n1011",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed65sanfrich|404",1970,1970,"1970-11-16","motion","running-the-city","passed","Height limits along The Embarcadero near the Bay Bridge put off","quoted","journalofproceed65sanfrich",1009,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed65sanfrich/page/n1008",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.27],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed65sanfrich|409",1970,1970,"1970-11-16","ordinance","running-the-city","passed","Embarcadero height limits near the Bay Bridge held over again","unverified","journalofproceed65sanfrich",1012,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed65sanfrich/page/n1011",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-0.03],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed65sanfrich|g2225",1970,1970,"1970-12-07","resolution","transport","pending","Call to delay a new East Bay bridge sent to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed65sanfrich",1074,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed65sanfrich/page/n1069",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:181/1",1970,1970,"4/16/69","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: Westbound rush hour traffic statistics (6:30-9:00 A.M.), from University of California traffic survey","unverified","C124878408",181,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n180","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:192/3",1970,1970,"April 15, 1969","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · finding: Westbound vehicular traffic count, Tuesday April 15 (1969), shown in Figure II-29","unverified","C124878408",192,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n191",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:180/2",1970,1970,"January 1970","event","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge toll increase legislation · proposes: Introduced legislation to double the Bay Bridge toll level and use added monies to aid BART","unverified","C124878301",180,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n179","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1970:7/1",1970,1970,"March 26, 1970","action","minutes or proceedings",null,"State Division of Bay Toll Crossings, San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · approved: Minor permit to remove, repair, and replace damaged portions of the timber fender at Pier W-3","unverified","igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1970",7,"https://archive.org/details/igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1970/page/n6","W-3 San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge",null,null,"Minor permits granted since ... Commission meeting. 1970","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1971:9/1",1971,1971,"","recommendation","permit list",null,"Northern Waterfront (Bay Bridge to Aquatic Park) · recommendation: BCDC action on major development delayed until a Statement of General Design Principles is adopted","unverified","igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1971",9,"https://archive.org/details/igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1971/page/n8",null,null,null,"Minor permits granted since ... Commission meeting. 1971","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1971:13/2",1971,1971,"1971","action","permit list",null,"Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company · proposes: construct a 24'x10' addition to an existing equipment platform south of Pier 9 of the eastern cantilevered section of the Bay Bridge","unverified","igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1971",13,"https://archive.org/details/igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1971/page/n12","San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge",null,null,"Minor permits granted since ... Commission meeting. 1971","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed66sanfrich|g151",1971,1971,"1971-02-01",null,"transport","passed","Board opposes proposed Southern Bay bridge, as amended","unverified","journalofproceed66sanfrich",79,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed66sanfrich/page/n79",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.03],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed66sanfrich:117/2",1971,1971,"1971-02-16","ordinance","whats-being-built","passed first reading","Zoning map change for waterfront land along The Embarcadero between Howard Street and the Bay Bridge continues onto the next page; passed first reading only.","quoted","journalofproceed66sanfrich",117,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed66sanfrich/page/n117",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed66sanfrich|40",1971,1971,"1971-02-16","motion","running-the-city","passed first reading","Waterfront rezoning near the Bay Bridge wins first approval","unverified","journalofproceed66sanfrich",117,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed66sanfrich/page/n117",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,7.54],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:57/2",1977,1971,"1971-1973","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge traffic study · other: Before BART sample: average of 8 days","unverified","C124901922",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n56","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:57/1",1977,1971,"1971-1973; 1974 (Fall)-1976","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge traffic study · other: Six-minute vehicle volumes, eastbound afternoon peak, before and after BART","unverified","C124901922",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n56","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:56/1",1977,1971,"1971-1976","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: Six-minute vehicle volumes in the westbound morning peak before and after BART","unverified","C124901922",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n55","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1971:27/2",1971,1971,"December 13, 1971","action","permit list",null,"KDIA Radio addition, north side of Bay Bridge toll plaza · approved: Permit to construct a 1,300-square foot addition to an existing radio station","unverified","igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1971",27,"https://archive.org/details/igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1971/page/n26",null,null,null,"Minor permits granted since ... Commission meeting. 1971","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1971:3/1",1971,1971,"February 22, 1971","action","permit list",null,"State Division of Bay Toll Crossings shoreline fill and rock slope protection, east end of Bay Bridge · approved: Permit granted for fill and rock slope protection along 600 feet of shoreline on north side of mole fill","unverified","igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1971",3,"https://archive.org/details/igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1971/page/n2",null,null,null,"Minor permits granted since ... Commission meeting. 1971","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1971:3/2",1971,1971,"February 22, 1971","action","permit list",null,"State Division of Bay Toll Crossings tidelands fill, south side of Bay Bridge mole · approved: Permit granted to fill tidelands westward approximately 150 feet to create straight shoreline south 80 feet to existing bank","unverified","igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1971",3,"https://archive.org/details/igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1971/page/n2",null,null,null,"Minor permits granted since ... Commission meeting. 1971","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124895561:18/4",1972,1972,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Pedestrian Promenade · proposes: Safe, direct, continuous pedestrian way linking waterfront open spaces from Bay Bridge to Aquatic Park","unverified","C124895561",18,"https://archive.org/details/C124895561/page/n17",null,null,null,"Improvement plan for recreation & open space : a proposal for citizen review : the comprehensive plan of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:19/1",1977,1972,"1972","finding","study or report",null,"Alameda, [name withheld] and San Francisco counties (Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel traffic area) · other: population increase ended in 1972, then slight drop to 1975 and no change through 1976","unverified","C124901922",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n18",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","m",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1972:19/1",1972,1972,"December 4, 1972","action","permit list",null,"Timber fender repair at Pier W-3, San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · approved: Permit granted to State Division of Bay Toll Crossings to repair and replace portions of a timber fender","unverified","igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1972",19,"https://archive.org/details/igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1972/page/n18",null,null,null,"Minor permits granted since ... Commission meeting. 1972","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123317767:600/4",1973,1973,"","building","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: Horizontal clearance between piers A-B and D-E about 2,229 feet at each span","unverified","C123317767",600,"https://archive.org/details/C123317767/page/n599",null,null,null,"San Francisco Bay area in-depth study : vessels and port facilities analysis channels, ports and related facilities inventory","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123317767:600/5",1973,1973,"","building","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: Horizontal clearance between center piers B-C and C-D about 1,072 feet at each span","unverified","C123317767",600,"https://archive.org/details/C123317767/page/n599",null,null,null,"San Francisco Bay area in-depth study : vessels and port facilities analysis channels, ports and related facilities inventory","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123317767:600/6",1973,1973,"","building","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: Vertical clearance under cantilevered span east of Yerba Buena Island 184 feet","unverified","C123317767",600,"https://archive.org/details/C123317767/page/n599",null,null,null,"San Francisco Bay area in-depth study : vessels and port facilities analysis channels, ports and related facilities inventory","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123317767:600/7",1973,1973,"","building","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: Channel width about 1,330 feet under cantilevered span east of Yerba Buena Island","unverified","C123317767",600,"https://archive.org/details/C123317767/page/n599",null,null,null,"San Francisco Bay area in-depth study : vessels and port facilities analysis channels, ports and related facilities inventory","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123317767:600/8",1973,1973,"","building","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: Three openings east of the cantilevered span: vertical clearances 165 to 175 feet, channel widths 435.5 to 460.5 feet","unverified","C123317767",600,"https://archive.org/details/C123317767/page/n599",null,null,null,"San Francisco Bay area in-depth study : vessels and port facilities analysis channels, ports and related facilities inventory","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123317767:622/10001",1973,1973,"","measure","study or report",null,"San Francisco Bay South Channel traffic separation plan · other: Separation plan for area extending south from precautionary area east of Alcatraz Island under San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge","unverified","C123317767",622,"https://archive.org/details/C123317767/page/n621",null,null,null,"San Francisco Bay area in-depth study : vessels and port facilities analysis channels, ports and related facilities inventory","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123317767:623/3",1973,1973,"","measure","study or report",null,"Northbound traffic lane, San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: Northbound lane bounded by the separation line and lines between listed latitude and longitude points, ending at Pier E","unverified","C123317767",623,"https://archive.org/details/C123317767/page/n622",null,null,null,"San Francisco Bay area in-depth study : vessels and port facilities analysis channels, ports and related facilities inventory","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124892888:159/3",1973,1973,"","finding","plan",null,"Eastern shoreline between Bay Bridge and County line · finding: lacks suitable public open space","unverified","c124892888",159,"https://archive.org/details/c124892888/page/n158",null,null,null,"Recreation & open space programs recommendations for implementing the recreation and open space element of the Comprehensive plan of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123321093:342/1",1977,1973,"1973","project","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge approaches / Richmond-San Rafael or San Francisco Bay bridge proposal · other: MTC staff decided to include the entire proposal in Section III of the 1973 Plan as a transportation issue","unverified","C123321093",342,"https://archive.org/details/C123321093/page/n341",null,null,null,"Political influence in transportation planning : the San Francisco Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission's regional transportation plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1973:14/1",1973,1973,"1973","project","minutes or proceedings",null,"San Francisco Waterfront Advisory Committee · other: discussion of the area just north of the Bay Bridge","unverified","igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1973",14,"https://archive.org/details/igsl_sfbcdc-minor-permits-granted_1973/page/n13",null,null,null,"Minor permits granted since ... Commission meeting. 1973","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697104:15/1",1976,1974,"1974","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · finding: peak-period traffic load would be only 15% less than in 1974 if travel habits do not change","unverified","C101697104",15,"https://archive.org/details/C101697104/page/n14","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Impact of BART on transportation and travel : interim service findings : interpretive summary : a report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:11/1",1977,1974,"1974","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge transbay traffic · finding: sudden shift in trend lines; vehicle volumes dropped, transit patronage jumped","unverified","C124901922",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n10",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:37/1",1977,1974,"1974","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge vehicle volume trends · finding: Post-BART regression line starts considerably below the level where the pre-BART line left off","unverified","C124901922",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n36","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:38/1",1977,1974,"1974","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge vehicle volumes · finding: post-BART trend lines have steeper slopes than pre-BART lines","unverified","C124901922",38,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n37",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:51/1",1977,1974,"1974","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge traffic trend · finding: BART transbay link opening was the primary reason for the discontinuity in Bay Bridge trend lines","unverified","C124901922",51,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n50",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:62/4",1977,1974,"1974","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: BART opening temporarily reduced vehicle volumes; volumes now catching up","unverified","C124901922",62,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n61",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:21/10006",1977,1974,"1974 (April)","event","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge westbound approach traffic metering · event: Inauguration of traffic metering at the westbound approach to the Bay Bridge","unverified","C124901922",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n20","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:21/4",1977,1974,"1974 (April)","event","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge westbound traffic metering · event: inauguration of traffic metering at the westbound approach","unverified","C124901922",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n20",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123301983:19/1",1975,1975,"","measure","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge toll plaza · other: metering system on the Bay Bridge and preferential treatment for buses and car pools through the toll plaza during the peak","unverified","C123301983",19,"https://archive.org/details/C123301983/page/n18","Bay Bridge",null,null,"The Bay Area Rapid Transit System : current status and impacts /","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123319604:24/7",1975,1975,"","site","environmental impact report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: double-tiered, five-lane bridge enters San Francisco above Pier 24","unverified","C123319604",24,"https://archive.org/details/C123319604/page/n23","Harrison Street",null,null,"Final environmental impact report on special area plan for the San Francisco waterfront","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123319604:30/2",1975,1975,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"Bay shrimp fishery along the waterfront · finding: Formerly a major shrimp netting area along the San Francisco waterfront, south of the Bay Bridge","unverified","C123319604",30,"https://archive.org/details/C123319604/page/n29",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact report on special area plan for the San Francisco waterfront","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123319604:32/3",1975,1975,"","site","environmental impact report",null,"Piers 26-32 and Piers 46a and b · use: active cargo-handling facilities","unverified","C123319604",32,"https://archive.org/details/C123319604/page/n31",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact report on special area plan for the San Francisco waterfront","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123319604:32/5",1975,1975,"","site","environmental impact report",null,"Piers 34-44 · use: maritime use largely discontinued by the Port","unverified","C123319604",32,"https://archive.org/details/C123319604/page/n31","34-44",null,null,"Final environmental impact report on special area plan for the San Francisco waterfront","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123319604:32/6",1975,1975,"","site","environmental impact report",null,"Ferry Building piers · use: none remain in maritime use; eight continue serving non-cargo tenants","unverified","C123319604",32,"https://archive.org/details/C123319604/page/n31",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact report on special area plan for the San Francisco waterfront","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123319604:33/1",1975,1975,"","property_record","environmental impact report",null,"Seawall lots between the Bay Bridge and [name withheld] · use: very marginal use; no current plans for development","unverified","C123319604",33,"https://archive.org/details/C123319604/page/n32",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact report on special area plan for the San Francisco waterfront","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123319604:46/6",1975,1975,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"Special Area Plan open space benefit · other: 50% open space in conjunction with development between Bay Bridge and Pier 7","unverified","C123319604",46,"https://archive.org/details/C123319604/page/n45",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact report on special area plan for the San Francisco waterfront","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123319604:47/6",1975,1975,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"Special Area Plan · other: 50% open space realizable with development between Bay Bridge and Pier 7","unverified","C123319604",47,"https://archive.org/details/C123319604/page/n46",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact report on special area plan for the San Francisco waterfront","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123319604:48/3",1975,1975,"","site","environmental impact report",null,"Special Area Plan, San Francisco waterfront · other: development permitted on replacement fill flanking the Ferry Building and between the Bay Bridge and [name withheld]","unverified","C123319604",48,"https://archive.org/details/C123319604/page/n47",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact report on special area plan for the San Francisco waterfront","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123319604:54/2",1975,1975,"","recommendation","environmental impact report",null,"I-280 extension · recommendation: proposed inland re-routing of the I-280 extension","unverified","C123319604",54,"https://archive.org/details/C123319604/page/n53",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact report on special area plan for the San Francisco waterfront","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123319604:92/3",1975,1975,"","alternative","environmental impact report",null,"Maritime Use of Area E · alternative: Maritime Use of Area E (Bay Bridge to [name withheld])","unverified","C123319604",92,"https://archive.org/details/C123319604/page/n91",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact report on special area plan for the San Francisco waterfront","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123319604:92/4",1975,1975,"","site","environmental impact report",null,"Area E · other: never identified by the Port for future maritime expansion","unverified","C123319604",92,"https://archive.org/details/C123319604/page/n91",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact report on special area plan for the San Francisco waterfront","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124884963:170/6",1975,1975,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Newsprint receiving and storage pier (Crown Zellerbach) · recommendation: New pier facility for newsprint probably south of the Bay Bridge","unverified","C124884963",170,"https://archive.org/details/C124884963/page/n169",null,null,null,"Commercial and industrial activity in San Francisco : present characteristics and future trends : report to San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903355:60/1",1975,1975,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Bay north of Bay Bridge · finding: wastewater concentrations below 1 percent","unverified","C124903355",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124903355/page/n59",null,null,null,"San Francisco Bay Region wastewater management facilities project coordination program report ... for BASSA, Bay Area Sewage Services Agency","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C055308255:109/2",1951,1975,"1975","finding","study or report",null,"Combined capacity of South Barrier crossing and San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: This volume of traffic might be reached by 1975","unverified","C055308255",109,"https://archive.org/details/C055308255/page/n108",null,"Thie volume of traffic might be reached by 1975.",null,"Report on development of the San Francisco Bay region, prepared for the Fact-Finding Committee of the California Assembly on Tidelands Reclamation and Development, Related Traffic Problems and Relief of Congestion on Transbay Crossings,","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123319604:45/2",1975,1975,"1975","project","environmental impact report",null,"Special Area Plan, Piers 34-44 · proposes: Commercial recreation on replacement fill, not likely until inland development occurs","unverified","C123319604",45,"https://archive.org/details/C123319604/page/n44","34-44",null,null,"Final environmental impact report on special area plan for the San Francisco waterfront","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123319604:60/1",1975,1975,"1975","project","environmental impact report",null,"Inland triangle redevelopment (Special Area Plan) · proposes: Redevelopment of inland triangle as mixed-use residential neighborhood","unverified","C123319604",60,"https://archive.org/details/C123319604/page/n59","The Embarcadero",null,null,"Final environmental impact report on special area plan for the San Francisco waterfront","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123319604:60/2",1975,1975,"1975","finding","environmental impact report",null,"Inland triangle redevelopment (Special Area Plan) · finding: Proposed redevelopment triangle is outside BCDC jurisdiction","unverified","C123319604",60,"https://archive.org/details/C123319604/page/n59",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact report on special area plan for the San Francisco waterfront","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123319604:60/3",1975,1975,"1975","finding","environmental impact report",null,"Waterfront development between Bay Bridge and [name withheld] · finding: Waterfront development of this type probably won't occur unless mixed-use development occurs in the inland area","unverified","C123319604",60,"https://archive.org/details/C123319604/page/n59",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact report on special area plan for the San Francisco waterfront","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:22/3",1977,1975,"1975","event","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge Toll Plaza free lanes · event: Free lanes for buses and car pools at Toll Plaza","unverified","C124901922",22,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n21",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:71/1",1977,1975,"1975","finding","study or report",null,"PBTB traffic and modal split predictions, Bay Bridge (Transbay) gateway · finding: PBTB made excellent predictions of total traffic and modal split at the Transbay gateway","unverified","C124901922",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n70",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123301983:26/1",1975,1975,"4/70 to 4/75","finding","study or report",null,"BART current status and impacts study, Figure 4 westbound person-trips · other: Total transit share increase in westbound person-trips, 6 AM to 8 PM, April 1970 to April 1975","unverified","C123301983",26,"https://archive.org/details/C123301983/page/n25","Oakland Bay Bridge",null,null,"The Bay Area Rapid Transit System : current status and impacts /","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123319604:10/6",1975,1975,"November, 1974","project","environmental impact report",null,"Transportation System for the Embarcadero Area · proposes: Connection between Interstate 280 and the Bay Bridge","unverified","C123319604",10,"https://archive.org/details/C123319604/page/n9",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact report on special area plan for the San Francisco waterfront","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123301983:22/2",1975,1975,"October 1974","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge traffic volume · other: 6,750 fewer passenger cars crossing the bridge daily (estimate)","unverified","C123301983",22,"https://archive.org/details/C123301983/page/n21",null,null,null,"The Bay Area Rapid Transit System : current status and impacts /","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123301983:23/1",1975,1975,"October 1974","finding","study or report",null,"BART transbay riders (Figure 2) · other: Prior mode of BART patrons, May 1974 and October 1974 surveys, East Bay and San Francisco only and transbay only","unverified","C123301983",23,"https://archive.org/details/C123301983/page/n22",null,null,null,"The Bay Area Rapid Transit System : current status and impacts /","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697104:3/3",1976,1976,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART effect on Bay Bridge traffic · finding: statistically detectable but negligible in any practical sense","unverified","C101697104",3,"https://archive.org/details/C101697104/page/n2","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Impact of BART on transportation and travel : interim service findings : interpretive summary : a report","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123320752:19/3",1976,1976,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Shoreline roadway system · proposes: Prohibit any increase to the capacity of the roadway system along the shoreline to accommodate automobiles","unverified","C123320752",19,"https://archive.org/details/C123320752/page/n18",null,null,null,"The plan for the northeastern waterfront : a part of the Master plan of the City and County of San Francisco and a revision of the existing Northern waterfront plan : a proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123320752:47/4",1976,1976,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Waterfront between [name withheld] and the Bay Bridge · proposes: If no longer needed for maritime use, extend mixed-use development bayward to The Embarcadero area and encourage a marina with inland parking","unverified","C123320752",47,"https://archive.org/details/C123320752/page/n46","The Embarcadero",null,null,"The plan for the northeastern waterfront : a part of the Master plan of the City and County of San Francisco and a revision of the existing Northern waterfront plan : a proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123320761:19/4",1976,1976,"","alternative","environmental impact report",null,"Existing Northeastern Waterfront Plan · alternative: encourage provision of parking belts or parking resource areas","unverified","C123320761",19,"https://archive.org/details/C123320761/page/n18","Market Street",null,null,"Draft environmental impact report for a proposal for citizen review : the Plan for the northeastern waterfront : a part of the Master plan of the City and County of San Francisco and a revision of the existing Northern waterfront plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124892967:23/5",1976,1976,"","site","study or report",null,"Northern Waterfront · other: extends from Aquatic Park to the Bay Bridge; growing employment and residential center with waterfront recreation","unverified","c124892967",23,"https://archive.org/details/c124892967/page/n22",null,null,null,"Transportation conditions and trends : background information for the transportation strategy and programs report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124892967:49/1",1976,1976,"","measure","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge exclusive bus lanes · other: exclusive bus lanes at the Bay Bridge Toll Plaza","unverified","c124892967",49,"https://archive.org/details/c124892967/page/n48","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Transportation conditions and trends : background information for the transportation strategy and programs report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124892967:49/3",1976,1976,"","measure","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge carpool and bus lane program · other: 12 hours of operation, from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.","unverified","c124892967",49,"https://archive.org/details/c124892967/page/n48","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Transportation conditions and trends : background information for the transportation strategy and programs report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906393:33/1",1977,1976,"1976","measure","study or report",null,"BART · other: 67.9 persons per car, 94% seat occupancy, peak period/peak direction","unverified","C124906393",33,"https://archive.org/details/C124906393/page/n32",null,null,null,"BART's operating energy consumption","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124892967:51/2",1976,1976,"1976","measure","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: 22,500 vehicles in morning peak, westbound, average weekday (excluding buses)","unverified","c124892967",51,"https://archive.org/details/c124892967/page/n50",null,null,null,"Transportation conditions and trends : background information for the transportation strategy and programs report","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed71sanfrich|g1001",1976,1976,"1976-06-28","motion","transport","referred","Proposed: city opposes state bill diverting Bay Bridge money.","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed71sanfrich",282,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed71sanfrich/page/n281",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697104:10/5",1976,1976,"January 1972 to May 1975","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · finding: the only one of four major Bay bridges affected by BART","unverified","C101697104",10,"https://archive.org/details/C101697104/page/n9",null,null,null,"Impact of BART on transportation and travel : interim service findings : interpretive summary : a report","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697104:11/3",1976,1976,"May 1975","site","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: net reduction in traffic shrank to 4,000 (about 3.1%)","unverified","C101697104",11,"https://archive.org/details/C101697104/page/n10","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Impact of BART on transportation and travel : interim service findings : interpretive summary : a report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124892967:51/1",1976,1976,"May 1976","measure","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: 181,000 vehicles average daily traffic (2-way), May 1976","unverified","c124892967",51,"https://archive.org/details/c124892967/page/n50",null,null,null,"Transportation conditions and trends : background information for the transportation strategy and programs report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697104:11/4",1976,1976,"after the opening of BART's Transbay service","site","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: morning peak average vehicle speed increased from 16 to 18 miles an hour","unverified","C101697104",11,"https://archive.org/details/C101697104/page/n10","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Impact of BART on transportation and travel : interim service findings : interpretive summary : a report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697104:11/6",1976,1976,"between December 1971 and May 1975","event","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: daytime bridge toll eliminated for automobiles carrying three persons or more","unverified","C101697104",11,"https://archive.org/details/C101697104/page/n10","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Impact of BART on transportation and travel : interim service findings : interpretive summary : a report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697104:11/2",1976,1976,"shortly after BART trains began running through the Transbay Tube","site","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: weekday traffic declined by about 11,000 trips (about 8.5%) shortly after BART Transbay trains began","unverified","C101697104",11,"https://archive.org/details/C101697104/page/n10","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Impact of BART on transportation and travel : interim service findings : interpretive summary : a report","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697104:11/5",1976,1976,"since BART began Transbay operations","site","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: morning peak center shifted from about 7:30 AM to 7:45 AM","unverified","C101697104",11,"https://archive.org/details/C101697104/page/n10","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Impact of BART on transportation and travel : interim service findings : interpretive summary : a report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697104:11/1",1976,1976,"summer 1974","site","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: about 94,000 vehicles a day in each direction (weekdays, summer 1974, before BART Transbay service)","unverified","C101697104",11,"https://archive.org/details/C101697104/page/n10","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Impact of BART on transportation and travel : interim service findings : interpretive summary : a report","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123321093:26/2",1977,1977,"","building","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: under the jurisdiction of the California Toll Bridge Administration","unverified","C123321093",26,"https://archive.org/details/C123321093/page/n25",null,null,null,"Political influence in transportation planning : the San Francisco Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission's regional transportation plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123321093:30/10003",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · finding: chronic congestion on streets and highways, particularly the Bay Bridge itself","unverified","C123321093",30,"https://archive.org/details/C123321093/page/n29",null,null,null,"Political influence in transportation planning : the San Francisco Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission's regional transportation plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123321093:31/2",1977,1977,"","agency","study or report",null,"Bay Area Council · proposes: operational improvements on the Bay Bridge, additional transbay crossings, and increased coordination in planning","unverified","C123321093",31,"https://archive.org/details/C123321093/page/n30",null,null,null,"Political influence in transportation planning : the San Francisco Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission's regional transportation plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:11/2",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · finding: capacity appears to have increased slightly after removal of buses","unverified","C124901922",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n10",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:18/1",1977,1977,"","site","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge screen line · other: Bay Bridge screen line location shown in Figure 1","unverified","C124901922",18,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n17",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:22/4",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge Toll Plaza permit lanes · finding: Effect of permit lanes and related events on vehicle capacity is probably zero","unverified","C124901922",22,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n21",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:23/3",1977,1977,"","site","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: all vehicles classified in peak periods, 50% at other times","unverified","C124901922",23,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n22",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:23/4",1977,1977,"","site","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge toll plaza · other: car pool lanes sampled separately","unverified","C124901922",23,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n22",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:60/2",1977,1977,"","measure","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge westbound approach lanes · other: introduction of metering the approach lanes","unverified","C124901922",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n59",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:60/3",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: metering may add no more than one or two percent to bridge capacity","unverified","C124901922",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n59",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:61/1",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · finding: Peak traffic flow increases smaller and statistically less significant; westbound capacity may have been influenced similarly","unverified","C124901922",61,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n60","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:63/5",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge peak period traffic · finding: reduction in flow rates in the early part of the morning peak at the Bay Bridge","unverified","C124901922",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n62",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:7/3",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · finding: BART caused removal of a substantial number of buses, effectively increasing vehicle-handling capacity","unverified","C124901922",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n6",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:7/4",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · finding: Higher traffic flow rates during the height of the peak periods","unverified","C124901922",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n6",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906269:103/1",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco shoreline between Hunters Point and [name withheld] · finding: largely developed for industry, railroad yards, and shipping","unverified","C124906269",103,"https://archive.org/details/C124906269/page/n102",null,null,null,"National urban recreation study, San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906311:39/1",1977,1977,"","site","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: carries about 95,000 vehicles per day in each direction","unverified","C124906311",39,"https://archive.org/details/C124906311/page/n38","San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge",null,null,"A description of BART : its facilities, service and surroundings","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906311:39/2",1977,1977,"","site","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: connects the freeways of the San Francisco peninsula and the employment centers of San Francisco directly to Oakland","unverified","C124906311",39,"https://archive.org/details/C124906311/page/n38","San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge",null,null,"A description of BART : its facilities, service and surroundings","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906393:39/4",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART · finding: BART reduced Bay Bridge traffic volumes, congestion and improved driving conditions","unverified","C124906393",39,"https://archive.org/details/C124906393/page/n38","Bay Bridge",null,null,"BART's operating energy consumption","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906393:39/5",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART induced automobile trips on Bay Bridge · other: at least a 5% increase in automobile vehicle volume over the volume without BART","unverified","C124906393",39,"https://archive.org/details/C124906393/page/n38","Bay Bridge",null,null,"BART's operating energy consumption","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906393:39/6",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART induced automobile trips on Bay Bridge · other: daily increase of about 3,000 vehicles in each direction","unverified","C124906393",39,"https://archive.org/details/C124906393/page/n38","Bay Bridge",null,null,"BART's operating energy consumption","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906490:125/2",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Historical Bay Bridge counts for AC Transit vehicles · other: 40 to 42 passengers per AC vehicle through the toll booths","unverified","C124906490",125,"https://archive.org/details/C124906490/page/n124",null,null,null,"Exploratory network analyses of BART's impacts on accessibility : working report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909766:35/1",1977,1977,"","site","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: about 95,000 vehicles per day in each direction","unverified","C124909766",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124909766/page/n34",null,null,null,"Travel in the BART service area /","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:30/1",1977,1977,"1977","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge traffic volume trends · finding: vehicle volume trends correlate with time and the 3-county population; all coefficients are positive","unverified","C124901922",30,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n29",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:35/1",1977,1977,"1977","event","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge toll increase · event: Bay Bridge toll increase in 1977 introduces a new independent variable at the transbay screenline","unverified","C124901922",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n34","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:54/1",1977,1977,"1977","measure","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge six-minute vehicular traffic flow, morning peak period · other: Total 23354","unverified","C124901922",54,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n53","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:62/1",1977,1977,"1977","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: capacity increase of perhaps 6% westbound","unverified","C124901922",62,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n61",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:62/2",1977,1977,"1977","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: capacity increase of perhaps 3% eastbound","unverified","C124901922",62,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n61",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:70/1",1977,1977,"1977","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge traffic capacity · other: probable increase in capacity of 200 due to new auxiliary lane","unverified","C124901922",70,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n69","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:70/2",1977,1977,"1977","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge traffic inflow · other: hypothesized increase in inflow of 254 and 294 due to fewer heavy vehicles","unverified","C124901922",70,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n69","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich:138/1",1977,1977,"1977-02-07","resolution",null,"passed","Resolution against northern billboards between Fisherman's Wharf and the Bay Bridge was adopted as amended, 6 to 4.","quoted","journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich",138,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich/page/n137",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich|g439",1977,1977,"1977-02-07",null,"property","passed","Billboard request now covers only the northern waterfront up to Bay Bridge","unverified","journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich",137,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich/page/n136",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.54],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:22/1",1977,1977,"April 1, 1970","event","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge Toll Plaza permit lane for A.C. Transit buses · event: Permit lane for A.C. Transit buses introduced at Toll Plaza","unverified","C124901922",22,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n21",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:22/2",1977,1977,"December 8, 1971","event","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge Toll Plaza permit lane for car pools · event: Permit lane for car pools introduced at Toll Plaza","unverified","C124901922",22,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n21",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:23/5",1977,1977,"Fall 1969","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: no data except machine counts of total traffic","unverified","C124901922",23,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n22",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:23/6",1977,1977,"Fall 1973","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: no eastbound machine counts of total traffic","unverified","C124901922",23,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n22",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:53/1",1977,1977,"Fall 1974","finding","study or report",null,"Transbay traffic, Bay Bridge · other: Pre-BART extrapolated 24-hour vehicle traffic 189,600","unverified","C124901922",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n52","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:53/3",1977,1977,"Fall 1974","finding","study or report",null,"Transbay traffic, Bay Bridge · other: Proportion of 24-hour person trips on mass transit rose from 19% pre-BART to 27% post-BART","unverified","C124901922",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n52","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:21/2",1977,1977,"February and March 1974","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge vehicle traffic · finding: vehicle traffic dropped 10% during the fuel crisis, against a trend growth of about 3%","unverified","C124901922",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n20",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906311:88/2",1977,1977,"October 1974","finding","study or report",null,"BART Impact Program transbay travel survey · other: approximately 136,000 person-trips in the daytime, all purposes","unverified","C124906311",88,"https://archive.org/details/C124906311/page/n87",null,null,null,"A description of BART : its facilities, service and surroundings","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:22/10002",1977,1977,"October 1976","site","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: peak period intervals changed to 5 minutes","unverified","C124901922",22,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n21",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-3.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:22/7",1977,1977,"October 1976","event","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge traffic counts · event: Peak period count intervals at Bay Bridge changed to 5 minutes because of new equipment","unverified","C124901922",22,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n21",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-3.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:32/2",1977,1977,"Spring 1965 to Fall 1973","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge traffic counts · other: Pre-BART data period: Spring 1965 to Fall 1973","unverified","C124901922",32,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n31","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:23/7",1977,1977,"Spring 1972","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: estimates made for missing Spring 1972 and Fall 1973 data","unverified","C124901922",23,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n22",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:24/1",1977,1977,"Spring 1972 - Fall 1973","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge traffic study · other: Before BART data sets: Spring 1972 through Fall 1973","unverified","C124901922",24,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n23",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:52/2",1977,1977,"after BART opening","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: average total vehicle flow between 0600 and 0630 dropped 840 vehicles or 29% after the BART opening","unverified","C124901922",52,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n51",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:52/3",1977,1977,"after BART opening","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: reduction of almost 300 vehicles or 7% in the following half hour after the BART opening","unverified","C124901922",52,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n51",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123321093:30/1",1977,1977,"late 1930's","building","study or report",null,"Golden Gate Bridge and San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · built: constructed in the late 1930's","unverified","C123321093",30,"https://archive.org/details/C123321093/page/n29",null,null,null,"Political influence in transportation planning : the San Francisco Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission's regional transportation plan","n","m",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906393:32/7",1977,1977,"peak period, peak direction","measure","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge automobile travel · other: automobile average occupancy 1.47 in peak period/peak direction (29% of five seats)","unverified","C124906393",32,"https://archive.org/details/C124906393/page/n31",null,null,null,"BART's operating energy consumption","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:53/2",1977,1977,"post-BART","finding","study or report",null,"Transbay traffic, Bay Bridge · other: Post-BART trend line 24-hour vehicle traffic 172,300","unverified","C124901922",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n52","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:53/4",1977,1977,"post-BART","finding","study or report",null,"Transbay traffic, Bay Bridge · other: Change in 24-hour person trips +2,800 (+0.9%) after BART","unverified","C124901922",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n52","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901922:7/2",1977,1977,"since 1974","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · finding: Transbay vehicle and transit traffic has increased at a more rapid rate since 1974","unverified","C124901922",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124901922/page/n6",null,null,null,"Trends in traffic patterns at the Bay Bridge and Caldecott Tunnel","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123310121:392/1",1978,1978,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · recommendation: Sell ticket books for Bay Bridge by mail only to avoid bridge congestion","unverified","C123310121",392,"https://archive.org/details/C123310121/page/n391",null,null,null,"Public comments and staff responses to Draft environmental management plan for the San Francisco Bay Region","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123310121:485/1",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Action 8 bridge toll measure · other: operations problem on the Bay Bridge","unverified","C123310121",485,"https://archive.org/details/C123310121/page/n484",null,null,null,"Public comments and staff responses to Draft environmental management plan for the San Francisco Bay Region","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906409:16/2",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Transbay commuters in Bay Bridge corridor · finding: Transbay commuters, both BART riders and non-riders, are most sensitive to the advantages BART offers","unverified","C124906409",16,"https://archive.org/details/C124906409/page/n15",null,null,null,"Study of workers' location decisions : working paper","n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljulydecofproceed73sanfrich:289/4",1978,1978,"1978-08-28","hearing","transit","referred","Hearing requested on concurring with temporary closure of two lower-deck lanes of the Bay Bridge on a Sunday in October; outcome continues.","quoted","journaljulydecofproceed73sanfrich",289,"https://archive.org/details/journaljulydecofproceed73sanfrich/page/n289",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljulydecofproceed73sanfrich|g1603",1978,1978,"1978-10-23","resolution","other","unknown","Support proposed for a Bay Bridge run aiding a music school.","quoted","journaljulydecofproceed73sanfrich",550,"https://archive.org/details/journaljulydecofproceed73sanfrich/page/n550",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:73/2",1979,1979,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge to Embarcadero, Market Street and Fort Mason transit connections · recommendation: providing bus or rail connections from the Bay Bridge to the Embarcadero, to Market Street, and to Fort Mason","unverified","C124924016",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n72","Market Street",null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:73/4",1979,1979,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Approach to the Bay Bridge · recommendation: eliminate hazardous conditions on the approach to the Bay Bridge","unverified","C124924016",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n72",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed74sanfrich|g2266",1979,1979,"1979-06-04","resolution","other","pending","Bay Bridge run to raise money for music school; not yet decided.","quoted","journaljanjuneofproceed74sanfrich",722,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed74sanfrich/page/n721",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljulydecofproceed74sanfrich|g251",1979,1979,"1979-07-16","resolution","other","passed","City backs Bay Bridge run raising money for music school","quoted","journaljulydecofproceed74sanfrich",85,"https://archive.org/details/journaljulydecofproceed74sanfrich/page/n84",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-0.78],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljulydecofproceed74sanfrich|g252",1979,1979,"1979-07-16",null,"other","passed","City backs Bay Bridge run raising money for music school.","unverified","journaljulydecofproceed74sanfrich",85,"https://archive.org/details/journaljulydecofproceed74sanfrich/page/n84",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.08],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903355:56/3",1975,1980,"1980","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge BOD concentration peak · finding: 1980 5-day BOD concentration peak south of the Bay Bridge, due to the North Point to Southeast Transport Project","unverified","C124903355",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124903355/page/n55",null,null,null,"San Francisco Bay Region wastewater management facilities project coordination program report ... for BASSA, Bay Area Sewage Services Agency","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903355:57/3",1975,1980,"1980","finding","study or report",null,"1980 BOD peak at San Francisco North Point load, south of Bay Bridge · finding: peak is well below the calculated maximum allowable BOD concentration at that point","unverified","C124903355",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124903355/page/n56",null,null,null,"San Francisco Bay Region wastewater management facilities project coordination program report ... for BASSA, Bay Area Sewage Services Agency","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903355:58/1",1975,1980,"1980","measure","study or report",null,"San Francisco North Point discharge · other: moved to Hunter's Point area, a bit south of the Bay Bridge, in 1980","unverified","C124903355",58,"https://archive.org/details/C124903355/page/n57",null,null,null,"San Francisco Bay Region wastewater management facilities project coordination program report ... for BASSA, Bay Area Sewage Services Agency","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903355:59/1",1975,1980,"1980","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco North Point discharge · other: Transfer of North Point discharge to Southeast Plant site, a bit south of Bay Bridge, raises South Bay concentrations between Bay Bridge and Dumbarton Bridge","unverified","C124903355",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124903355/page/n58",null,null,null,"San Francisco Bay Region wastewater management facilities project coordination program report ... for BASSA, Bay Area Sewage Services Agency","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed75sanfrich|g710",1980,1980,"1980-02-25","resolution","traffic","passed","City urges state to allow Bay Bridge closures for hike-bike events.","quoted","journaljanjuneofproceed75sanfrich",236,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed75sanfrich/page/n235",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-0.71],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljulydecofproceed76sanfrich:242/7",1981,1981,"1981-09-08","ordinance",null,"referred","Supervisor Nelder's proposed legislation to stop towed Bay Bridge cars being parked illegally on city streets was referred to committee.","quoted","journaljulydecofproceed76sanfrich",242,"https://archive.org/details/journaljulydecofproceed76sanfrich/page/n241",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124884334:62/5",1982,1982,"","action","plan",null,"Bay Bridge Toll Plaza truck lane · proposes: Provide left lane & toll booth for trucks at Bay Bridge Toll Plaza","unverified","C124884334",62,"https://archive.org/details/C124884334/page/n61",null,null,null,"The San Francisco Bay Area seaport plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124886581:6/9",1982,1982,"1982","site","annual report",null,"Rezoning study areas · other: City planners evaluating re-zoning prospects for South Beach, Rincon Hill and [name withheld]","unverified","C124886581",6,"https://archive.org/details/C124886581/page/n5",null,null,null,"San Francisco : the mayor's annual \"state of the city\" report","n","a",0,2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916687:38/5",1996,1982,"1982","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · finding: Trans-Bay bridges will be unusable at least during the initial hours","unverified","C124916687",38,"https://archive.org/details/C124916687/page/n37",null,null,null,"Community safety element : summary background report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922081:178/1",1984,1982,"1982","finding","study or report",null,"Interstate 80 and I-280 approaches to San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · finding: significant peak hour congestion (eastbound combined approaches)","unverified","C124922081",178,"https://archive.org/details/C124922081/page/n177","Interstate 80; Interstate 280",null,null,"Regional plan for San Francisco Bay Area naval shore activities : functional systems analyses/regional issues and options report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:157/4",1983,1983,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Golden Gate Bridge and Bay Bridge approaches · recommendation: Existing HOV lanes on approaches to the Golden Gate Bridge and the Bay Bridge toll plaza should be retained and improved","unverified","c124897620",157,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n156",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:68/8",1983,1983,"","project","plan",null,"Rincon Hill · acreage: 12-block, 55-acre area","unverified","c124897620",68,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n67",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:99/5",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium football traffic · other: traffic volumes reach at least 90 percent of roadway capacity; worst congestion on Bay Bridge","unverified","C124878444",99,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n98",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878967:15/8",1984,1984,"","site","study or report",null,"Blocks south of Harrison Street · use: mixture of parking, commercial/industrial uses, and vacant lots","unverified","C124878967",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124878967/page/n13","Harrison Street",null,null,"Rincon Hill plan : a residential/mixed use neighborhood near downtown : a proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878967:24/5",1984,1984,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge main span · recommendation: Structures near or adjacent to the Bay Bridge should maintain and reinforce the physical integrity of the main span as seen from a distance","unverified","C124878967",24,"https://archive.org/details/C124878967/page/n22",null,null,null,"Rincon Hill plan : a residential/mixed use neighborhood near downtown : a proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:106/1",1984,1984,"","measure","ordinance or legislation",null,"Bay Bridge · other: 17,880 existing P.M. peak vehicles; capacity 18,000","unverified","C124887761",106,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n105","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:106/5",1984,1984,"","finding","ordinance or legislation",null,"Bay Bridge and U.S. 101 corridors · finding: Bay Bridge and U.S. 101 already at capacity in peak two-hour period; Golden Gate Bridge and I-280 soon will be","unverified","C124887761",106,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n105","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922081:165/1",1984,1984,"","site","study or report",null,"San Francisco Bay Bridge · other: operating at vehicle capacity during morning and evening rush hours","unverified","C124922081",165,"https://archive.org/details/C124922081/page/n164","San Francisco Bay Bridge",null,null,"Regional plan for San Francisco Bay Area naval shore activities : functional systems analyses/regional issues and options report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922081:165/2",1984,1984,"","site","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge toll plaza · other: average commuter wait of 20-30 minutes in the morning at the toll plaza and a similar wait on the San Francisco side in the evening","unverified","C124922081",165,"https://archive.org/details/C124922081/page/n164","Bay Bridge toll plaza",null,null,"Regional plan for San Francisco Bay Area naval shore activities : functional systems analyses/regional issues and options report","n","a",0,-3.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922081:169/4",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · finding: Bridge already at capacity; increase is a very serious problem for State and Navy","unverified","C124922081",169,"https://archive.org/details/C124922081/page/n168",null,null,null,"Regional plan for San Francisco Bay Area naval shore activities : functional systems analyses/regional issues and options report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922081:178/2",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge Corridor · finding: congested freeway segment affecting Navy ground access functional links","unverified","C124922081",178,"https://archive.org/details/C124922081/page/n177",null,null,null,"Regional plan for San Francisco Bay Area naval shore activities : functional systems analyses/regional issues and options report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922081:182/1",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: operating at or above capacity during the peak hour commute","unverified","C124922081",182,"https://archive.org/details/C124922081/page/n181",null,null,null,"Regional plan for San Francisco Bay Area naval shore activities : functional systems analyses/regional issues and options report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922081:197/2",1984,1984,"","project","study or report",null,"East Bay Corridor I-580 HOV Lanes · proposes: Reversible HOV facility from the I-580/Rte. 24 interchange to the Bay Bridge, partially elevated, bypassing the toll plaza","unverified","C124922081",197,"https://archive.org/details/C124922081/page/n196",null,null,null,"Regional plan for San Francisco Bay Area naval shore activities : functional systems analyses/regional issues and options report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922081:45/2",1984,1984,"","building","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge west span · height ft: 220 feet high","unverified","C124922081",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124922081/page/n44",null,null,null,"Regional plan for San Francisco Bay Area naval shore activities : functional systems analyses/regional issues and options report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878967:17/1",1984,1984,"1984","site","study or report",null,"Rincon Hill land uses · other: Businesses around Bay Bridge","unverified","C124878967",17,"https://archive.org/details/C124878967/page/n15",null,null,null,"Rincon Hill plan : a residential/mixed use neighborhood near downtown : a proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124908577:57/1",1992,1984,"1984","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge and Golden Gate Bridge · finding: Both bridges at capacity in morning and evening peak commutes in 1984","unverified","C124908577",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124908577/page/n56",null,null,null,"[Public information documents relating to Port of San Francisco waterfront plan project]","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich|195",1984,1984,"1984-04-30","resolution","civic-life","referred","Bay Bridge lane closing for a charity run sent to committee","quoted","journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich",532,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich/page/n529",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich:655/1",1984,1984,"1984-05-29","resolution",null,"passed","Closure of two Bay Bridge upper-deck lanes on June 10, 1984 for a Mental Health Association fundraising run was supported.","quoted","journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich",655,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich/page/n652",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich|242",1984,1984,"1984-05-29","resolution","the-street","passed","Downtown streets closed for the start of a Bay Bridge footrace","quoted","journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich",654,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich/page/n651",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.8],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich/651/bcbaf3f6",1984,1984,"1984-05-29","resolution",null,"passed","Downtown streets closed for the start of a Bay Bridge footrace","unverified","journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich",654,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich/page/n651",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:48/2",1985,1985,"","action","study or report",null,"Ferry service in general vicinity of San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: service in the general vicinity of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge may be authorized by CTC","unverified","C123305299",48,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n47",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich:467/5",1985,1985,"1985-04-08","motion",null,"referred","A request to consider city support for the Bay Bridge Run for Mental Health was referred to Transportation and Traffic Committee.","quoted","journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich",467,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich/page/n454",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich:715/4",1985,1985,"1985-05-28","resolution",null,null,"Resolution supporting closing two Bay Bridge upper-deck lanes for a Mental Health Association fund-raising run; vote not shown.","quoted","journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich",715,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich/page/n702",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich|349",1985,1985,"1985-05-28","resolution","the-street","referred","Folsom Street closing for the Bay Bridge Run sent to committee","quoted","journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich",684,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich/page/n671",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich|364",1985,1985,"1985-05-28","resolution","the-street","passed","Folsom Street to close for the Bay Bridge Run staging","quoted","journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich",715,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich/page/n702",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.59],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich/671/10608085",1985,1985,"1985-05-28","resolution",null,"referred","Folsom Street closing for the Bay Bridge Run sent to committee","unverified","journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich",684,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich/page/n671",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich|213",1985,1985,"1985-09-23","ordinance","land-and-building","continued","Rincon Hill to be rezoned for housing near the Bay Bridge","quoted","journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich",399,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich/page/n398",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich:506/1",1985,1985,"1985-10-21","ordinance","whats-being-built","continued","Proposed rezoning of land bounded by the Bay Bridge, Essex, Folsom and Steuart Streets was continued to November 4, 1985.","quoted","journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich",506,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich/page/n505",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich:506/2",1985,1985,"1985-10-21","ordinance","whats-being-built","continued","Proposed change to height and bulk limits for land bounded by the Bay Bridge, Essex, Folsom and Steuart Streets was continued to November 4, 1985.","quoted","journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich",506,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich/page/n505",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich|288",1985,1985,"1985-11-04","ordinance","land-and-building","passed first reading","Rincon Hill to be rezoned for housing near the Bay Bridge","quoted","journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich",545,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich/page/n544",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.17],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich|362",1985,1985,"1985-12-02","ordinance","land-and-building","passed","Rincon Hill to be rezoned for housing near the Bay Bridge","quoted","journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich",670,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich/page/n669",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,8.17],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceedjanapr81sanfrich:102/3",1986,1986,"1986-01-27","resolution",null,"passed","Two upper-deck lanes of the Bay Bridge closed June 1, 1986 for a Mental Health Association fundraising run.","unverified","journalofproceedjanapr81sanfrich",102,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceedjanapr81sanfrich/page/n101",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceedjanapr81sanfrich|36",1986,1986,"1986-01-27","resolution","the-street","passed","The Embarcadero to close for the Bay Bridge Run staging","quoted","journalofproceedjanapr81sanfrich",102,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceedjanapr81sanfrich/page/n101",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.17],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:journalofproceedjanapr81sanfrich/101/d8cfe75c",1986,1986,"1986-01-27","resolution",null,"passed","The Embarcadero to close for the Bay Bridge Run staging","unverified","journalofproceedjanapr81sanfrich",102,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceedjanapr81sanfrich/page/n101",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalseptdecofproceed81sanfrich:313/1",1986,1986,"1986-11-10","motion",null,"referred","Molinari urged the Chief Administrative Officer to fund $50,000 (≈ $153,714 in 2026 dollars) for permanent Bay Bridge lighting; referred to committee.","unverified","journalseptdecofproceed81sanfrich",313,"https://archive.org/details/journalseptdecofproceed81sanfrich/page/n310",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalseptdecofproceed81sanfrich:463/3",1986,1986,"1986-12-08","resolution",null,"passed","The Board adopted a resolution urging $50,000 (≈ $153,714 in 2026 dollars) from the Hotel Room Tax Fund for permanent Bay Bridge lighting.","unverified","journalseptdecofproceed81sanfrich",463,"https://archive.org/details/journalseptdecofproceed81sanfrich/page/n460",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanaprofproceed82sanfrich|129",1987,1987,"1987-03-09","resolution","the-street",null,"Bicycle ride route proposed from the Presidio across the Bay Bridge","unverified","journaljanaprofproceed82sanfrich",286,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanaprofproceed82sanfrich/page/n285",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123303273:86/5",1990,1989,"1989","event","study or report",null,"Pier E17, Bay Bridge · other: rocking response; base overturning moment reached yield level, causing some concrete fracture and yielding of vertical steel bars","unverified","C123303273",86,"https://archive.org/details/C123303273/page/n85",null,null,null,"Golden Gate Bridge seismic evaluation","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916687:15/4",1996,1989,"1989","site","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: Closed to traffic for one month after the 1989 earthquake","unverified","C124916687",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124916687/page/n14","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Community safety element : summary background report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919102:16/3",1996,1989,"1989","finding","plan",null,"I-280 connection to Bay Bridge · other: I-280 does not have a good connection to the Bay Bridge since the 1989 Loma [name withheld] earthquake","unverified","C124919102",16,"https://archive.org/details/C124919102/page/n15","I-280",null,null,"South Bayshore : a new beginning : citizen's guide to the South Bayshore plan","n","a",0,2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919315:27/1",1997,1989,"1989","event","study or report",null,"I-80/San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: failure in the 1989 Loma [name withheld] earthquake","unverified","C124919315",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124919315/page/n26","I-80",null,null,"Riding out future quakes : pre-earthquake planning for post-earthquake transportation system recovery in the San Francisco Bay region","n","a",0,2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:6/2",2000,1989,"1989","event","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · event: failure of the upper deck and a month-long closure of the bridge after [name withheld] earthquake","unverified","C124925065",6,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n5",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayseptofproceed84sanfrich:288/2",1989,1989,"1989-06-26","resolution",null,"passed","Adopted resolution urging the Mayor to oppose Caltrans' widening of I-80 Eastshore Freeway between the Bay Bridge and Carquinez Bridge.","quoted","journalmayseptofproceed84sanfrich",288,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayseptofproceed84sanfrich/page/n287",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,5.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909650:45/3",1990,1990,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART fares (funded by higher Bay Bridge tolls) · other: BART fares reduced 10%","unverified","C124909650",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124909650/page/n44",null,null,null,"Market-based solutions to the transportation crisis","n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceedjanjune85sanfrich:464/4",1990,1990,"1990-04-09","resolution",null,null,"Resolution supporting state bill SB 2100 would let the Metropolitan Transportation Commission set Bay Bridge tolls.","quoted","journalofproceedjanjune85sanfrich",464,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceedjanjune85sanfrich/page/n464",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceedjanjune85sanfrich:550/4",1990,1990,"1990-04-30","resolution",null,"passed","The Board adopted a resolution backing state bill SB 2100, which would let regional transport authorities add a Bay Bridge toll surcharge.","quoted","journalofproceedjanjune85sanfrich",550,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceedjanjune85sanfrich/page/n550",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed85julydecsanfrich:442/5",1990,1990,"1990-10-09","hearing",null,"referred","Supervisor Hallinan requested a hearing on plans to repair or replace the Bay Bridge Terminal Connector; referred to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed85julydecsanfrich",442,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed85julydecsanfrich/page/n439",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902980:147/3",1990,1990,"October earthquake","action","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge work · other: Special waivers granted to allow work on the Bay Bridge to be Federally reimbursable","unverified","C124902980",147,"https://archive.org/details/C124902980/page/n146",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors, city and county of San Francisco : review and analysis of the Deputy Mayor function in the Office of the Mayor","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124904854:42/1",1991,1991,"","measure","plan",null,"Traffic Operations System Segment 1 · lead agency: Caltrans","unverified","C124904854",42,"https://archive.org/details/C124904854/page/n41",null,null,null,"Bay Area '91 clean air plan","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124904854:42/3",1991,1991,"","measure","plan",null,"Bay Bridge electronic toll collection · proposes: MTC will seek funding to install electronic toll collection equipment on the Bay Bridge","unverified","C124904854",42,"https://archive.org/details/C124904854/page/n41",null,null,null,"Bay Area '91 clean air plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceedjanapr86sanfrich:418/4",1991,1991,"1991-04-08","hearing","transit","referred","Supervisor Britt's request to consider endorsing higher Bay Bridge tolls for regional transit was referred to the Economic and Social Policy Committee.","quoted","journalofproceedjanapr86sanfrich",418,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceedjanapr86sanfrich/page/n417",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich:21/3",1991,1991,"1991-05-06","resolution","transit","passed","The Board adopted as amended a resolution supporting state bill SB 210 on raising Bay Bridge and other bridge tolls for transit.","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich",21,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich/page/n20",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.28],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich:22/1",1991,1991,"1991-05-06","resolution","transit","passed","Resolution supporting state bill SB 210 to raise Bay Bridge and Dumbarton tolls was adopted as amended.","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich",22,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich/page/n21",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.15],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich|42",1991,1991,"1991-09-16","resolution","civic-life","referred","Closing three Bay Bridge lanes for the Lifespan run to be endorsed; sent to committee, later adopted","quoted","journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich",94,"https://archive.org/details/journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich/page/n93",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich:116/2",1991,1991,"1991-09-23","resolution",null,"passed","Board endorses Lifespan's running event and asks the state to close three Bay Bridge lanes.","quoted","journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich",116,"https://archive.org/details/journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich/page/n115",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124904854:41/1",1991,1991,"October 9, 1991","site","plan",null,"Bay Bridge · other: Federal TCM 26 assumed completion of Caltrans TOS on freeways in the immediate vicinity (Segment 1)","unverified","C124904854",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124904854/page/n40",null,null,null,"Bay Area '91 clean air plan","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124904854:42/2",1991,1991,"autumn 1991","measure","plan",null,"Traffic Operations System Segment 1 · event: expected to be completed","unverified","C124904854",42,"https://archive.org/details/C124904854/page/n41",null,null,null,"Bay Area '91 clean air plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124908577:238/10005",1992,1992,"","finding","study or report",null,"Excursion boat moorage and passenger loading · finding: need for additional moorage and passenger loading areas","unverified","C124908577",238,"https://archive.org/details/C124908577/page/n237",null,null,null,"[Public information documents relating to Port of San Francisco waterfront plan project]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124908577:238/8",1992,1992,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Excursion boat moorage and passenger loading · other: need for additional moorage and passenger loading areas",null,"C124908577",238,"https://archive.org/details/C124908577/page/n237",null,null,null,"[Public information documents relating to Port of San Francisco waterfront plan project]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124908577:57/2",1992,1992,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge and Golden Gate Bridge · finding: No current capital or construction plans to enhance carrying capacity of either bridge","unverified","C124908577",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124908577/page/n56",null,null,null,"[Public information documents relating to Port of San Francisco waterfront plan project]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101693454:56/1",1992,1992,"1992","measure","plan",null,"TCM #11 Install Freeway Travel Operations System (TOS) · other: Phase 1 TOS Segment I predicted to reduce emissions by 0.42% (RHC), 0.35% (NOx) and 0.65% (CO)","unverified","C101693454",56,"https://archive.org/details/C101693454/page/n55",null,null,null,"Public meeting to consider the approval of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District's 1991 clean air plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich:389/2",1992,1992,"1992-03-30","resolution",null,null,"Resolution urges the Governor to allow closing the Bay Bridge for the Lifespan charity run.","quoted","journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich",389,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich/page/n389",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914494:43/1",1993,1993,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Alternative A - New Transit Terminal · alternative: Private Land Acquisition","unverified","C124914494",43,"https://archive.org/details/C124914494/page/n42","Market Street",null,null,"Transit terminal study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914494:87/1",1993,1993,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"AC Transit buses · recommendation: should have direct access to and from the Bay Bridge via an exclusive bus ramp","unverified","C124914494",87,"https://archive.org/details/C124914494/page/n86",null,null,null,"Transit terminal study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914713:20/3",1993,1993,"","site","study or report",null,"Caltrans Bay Bridge bike shuttle · other: About 7 arrivals and departures per day during peak periods","unverified","C124914713",20,"https://archive.org/details/C124914713/page/n19",null,null,null,"Transbay Transit Terminal current and future needs study : staff working paper : final","n","m",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914713:20/4",1993,1993,"","site","study or report",null,"Caltrans Bay Bridge bike shuttle · other: About 50 passengers per day","unverified","C124914713",20,"https://archive.org/details/C124914713/page/n19",null,null,null,"Transbay Transit Terminal current and future needs study : staff working paper : final","n","m",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914713:25/3",1993,1993,"","finding","study or report",null,"Transbay Transit Terminal dedicated Bay Bridge bus ramps · finding: AC Transit operates 217 bus arrivals and departures on the ramps during the p.m. peak, about one bus every 30 seconds","unverified","C124914713",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124914713/page/n24",null,null,null,"Transbay Transit Terminal current and future needs study : staff working paper : final","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914713:25/4",1993,1993,"","finding","study or report",null,"Transbay Transit Terminal dedicated Bay Bridge bus ramps · finding: AC Transit stores 32 buses on the ramps on school days and up to 80 on school holidays","unverified","C124914713",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124914713/page/n24",null,null,null,"Transbay Transit Terminal current and future needs study : staff working paper : final","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914713:27/2",1993,1993,"","finding","study or report",null,"Transbay Terminal ramps · finding: Loop ramps connecting to the Bay Bridge are crucial to AC Transit, Greyhound and Gray Line operations","unverified","C124914713",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124914713/page/n26",null,null,null,"Transbay Transit Terminal current and future needs study : staff working paper : final","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914713:30/5",1993,1993,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Transbay Transit Terminal · other: Bus cycle from Bay Bridge (I-80) into Terminal and back in at most 4 minutes excluding loading time","unverified","C124914713",30,"https://archive.org/details/C124914713/page/n29",null,null,null,"Transbay Transit Terminal current and future needs study : staff working paper : final","n","a",0,-3.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914713:44/3",1993,1993,"","alternative","study or report",null,"BayLink light rail proposal · proposes: Light rail across the Bay Bridge and into the Terminal","unverified","C124914713",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124914713/page/n43",null,null,null,"Transbay Transit Terminal current and future needs study : staff working paper : final","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914713:44/4",1993,1993,"","alternative","study or report",null,"BayLink light rail proposal · other: Extensive modifications to Bay Bridge, Terminal access ramps and the Terminal itself","unverified","C124914713",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124914713/page/n43",null,null,null,"Transbay Transit Terminal current and future needs study : staff working paper : final","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914494:38/1",1993,1993,"1993","alternative","study or report",null,"Alternative A underground transit terminal · proposes: five bus platforms and forty-one bus berths","unverified","C124914494",38,"https://archive.org/details/C124914494/page/n37",null,null,null,"Transit terminal study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914494:38/2",1993,1993,"1993","alternative","study or report",null,"Alternative A underground transit terminal · proposes: five bus platforms and forty-one bus berths meeting projected future needs","unverified","C124914494",38,"https://archive.org/details/C124914494/page/n37",null,null,null,"Transit terminal study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914494:84/9",1993,1993,"1993","measure","study or report",null,"Existing bus ramp · other: A portion of the existing bus ramp can be utilized for new terminal connections","unverified","C124914494",84,"https://archive.org/details/C124914494/page/n83","Fremont Street",null,null,"Transit terminal study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922850:374/2",1996,1993,"1993","measure","environmental impact report",null,"Bay Bridge (Interstate 80) · other: ADT 253,000; LOS E/F","unverified","C124922850",374,"https://archive.org/details/C124922850/page/n373","Interstate 80 (Bay Bridge)",null,null,"Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich:236/4",1993,1993,"1993-03-01","resolution",null,"referred","Resolution supporting closing the Bay Bridge for the Lifespan running event is referred to the Board for adoption March 8.","quoted","journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich",236,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich/page/n235",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich:261/1",1993,1993,"1993-03-08","resolution",null,"passed","Board adopted as amended a resolution supporting closing the Bay Bridge for Lifespan, a charity run and walk.","quoted","journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich",261,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich/page/n260",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101737381:21/8",1994,1994,"","project","ordinance or legislation",null,"U.[name withheld] and cruise terminal · proposes: 50-story office building and cruise terminal on fill between the Ferry Building and the Bay Bridge","unverified","C101737381",21,"https://archive.org/details/C101737381/page/n20",null,null,null,"Draft waterfront land use plan","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101737381:69/3",1994,1994,"","site","ordinance or legislation",null,"The Embarcadero Promenade · other: extends along the water's edge from the Agriculture Building to the Bay Bridge","unverified","C101737381",69,"https://archive.org/details/C101737381/page/n68","The Embarcadero",null,null,"Draft waterfront land use plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124908106:23/3",1994,1994,"","project","ordinance or legislation",null,"U.[name withheld] · proposes: 50-story U.[name withheld] and cruise terminal on fill between the Ferry Building and the Bay Bridge","unverified","C124908106",23,"https://archive.org/details/C124908106/page/n22",null,null,null,"Port of San Francisco : draft waterfront land use plan","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124908106:49/3",1994,1994,"","site","ordinance or legislation",null,"The Embarcadero Promenade · other: extends along the water's edge from the Agriculture Building to the Bay Bridge","unverified","C124908106",49,"https://archive.org/details/C124908106/page/n48","The Embarcadero",null,null,"Port of San Francisco : draft waterfront land use plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124912557:33/10006",1994,1994,"","finding","plan",null,"I-280 connection to Bay Bridge · finding: I-280 is not adequately connected to the Bay Bridge to encourage industrial truck traffic away from residential areas","unverified","C124912557",33,"https://archive.org/details/C124912557/page/n32","I-280",null,null,"South Bayshore plan : a proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124908106:123/2",1994,1994,"Loma Prieta earthquake","event","ordinance or legislation",null,"Terminal Separator · demolished: Terminal Separator freeway ramps demolished after [name withheld] earthquake","unverified","C124908106",123,"https://archive.org/details/C124908106/page/n122","Embarcadero Freeway",null,null,"Port of San Francisco : draft waterfront land use plan","n","a",0,2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101737381:193/5",1994,1994,"following the Loma Prieta earthquake","event","ordinance or legislation",null,"Terminal Separator · demolished: freeway ramps connecting the Bay Bridge to the Embarcadero Freeway and City street system demolished","unverified","C101737381",193,"https://archive.org/details/C101737381/page/n192",null,null,null,"Draft waterfront land use plan","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:77/4",1995,1995,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge ramps · proposes: No new ramps to the Bay Bridge","unverified","C124914193",77,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n77",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124918135:35/5",1995,1995,"","project","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge congestion pricing proposal · proposes: Toll rise to $3 from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. to 6 p.m.","unverified","C124918135",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124918135/page/n34","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Analysis of potential dedicated funding sources for the Municipal Railway (MUNI) : report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124918135:37/1",1995,1995,"","measure","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge $1.00 toll increase · other: $38,364,065 flat annual revenue projection","unverified","C124918135",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124918135/page/n36","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Analysis of potential dedicated funding sources for the Municipal Railway (MUNI) : report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124918135:37/2",1995,1995,"","finding","study or report",null,"MUNI · other: $11,509,219 estimated annual revenue from $1.00 Bay Bridge toll increase","unverified","C124918135",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124918135/page/n36","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Analysis of potential dedicated funding sources for the Municipal Railway (MUNI) : report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124920755:261/4",1995,1995,"","site","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · use: no sidewalks; bicycles not allowed","unverified","C124920755",261,"https://archive.org/details/C124920755/page/n260",null,null,null,"San Francisco bicycle plan : draft report","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124920755:265/5",1995,1995,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · recommendation: Look into the long-term feasibility of making modifications to the Bay Bridge to allow bicycling on the bridge","unverified","C124920755",265,"https://archive.org/details/C124920755/page/n264","Bay Bridge",null,null,"San Francisco bicycle plan : draft report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124920755:36/1",1995,1995,"","project","study or report",null,"Caltrans Bay Bridge Bike Shuttle · other: Operates at 45 minute headways during peak periods only, between MacArthur Park BART and Transbay Terminal","unverified","C124920755",36,"https://archive.org/details/C124920755/page/n35",null,null,null,"San Francisco bicycle plan : draft report","n","m",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124920755:38/6",1995,1995,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: No sidewalks; bicycles not allowed","unverified","C124920755",38,"https://archive.org/details/C124920755/page/n37",null,null,null,"San Francisco bicycle plan : draft report","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124920755:38/7",1995,1995,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge Shuttle · recommendation: Increase frequency and add East Bay pick-up points to the Bay Bridge Shuttle; City to help secure funding","unverified","C124920755",38,"https://archive.org/details/C124920755/page/n37",null,null,null,"San Francisco bicycle plan : draft report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124920755:38/8",1995,1995,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge Shuttle · finding: Shuttle expansion not included in the Bay Bridge Congestion Pricing Study funding package","unverified","C124920755",38,"https://archive.org/details/C124920755/page/n37",null,null,null,"San Francisco bicycle plan : draft report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916766:35/1",1995,1995,"1995","finding","plan",null,"Regional freeway segments in San Francisco (101/280 to the Bay Bridge; 101 across the Golden Gate Bridge) · finding: Necessary connections to the regional and state freeway system for San Francisco residents, often at capacity","unverified","C124916766",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124916766/page/n34","US 101",null,null,"Transportation : an element of the master plan of the city and county of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124920755:256/2",1995,1995,"1995","project","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge Congestion Pricing Project · other: on hold; funding for trans-bay bus bicycle racks depends on it","unverified","C124920755",256,"https://archive.org/details/C124920755/page/n255",null,null,null,"San Francisco bicycle plan : draft report","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed90sanfrich:365/5",1995,1995,"1995-08-21","resolution",null,"referred","Resolution endorsing the Lifespan Bay Bridge 10K race was sent to the Board for adoption without committee.","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed90sanfrich",365,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed90sanfrich/page/n364",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed90sanfrich:381/2",1995,1995,"1995-08-28","resolution",null,"passed","The Board adopted a resolution endorsing the Lifespan Bay Bridge 10K Race and proclaiming September 24, 1995 [name withheld].","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed90sanfrich",381,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed90sanfrich/page/n380",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.3],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:21/5",1995,1995,"October 1963","event","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge lower deck · other: converted to mixed vehicular traffic by legislation; opened for unidirectional traffic","unverified","C124914193",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n21",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916687:58/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge retrofit · other: retrofit to a standard higher than no collapse","unverified","C124916687",58,"https://archive.org/details/C124916687/page/n57",null,null,null,"Community safety element : summary background report","n","a",0,2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916687:58/3",1996,1996,"","project","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge east approaches retrofit · other: construction underway","unverified","C124916687",58,"https://archive.org/details/C124916687/page/n57",null,null,null,"Community safety element : summary background report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919175:164/2",1996,1996,"","building","plan",null,"Terminal Separator · demolished: Terminal Separator freeway ramps connecting Bay Bridge to Embarcadero Freeway","unverified","C124919175",164,"https://archive.org/details/C124919175/page/n163",null,null,null,"Port of San Francisco waterfront land use plan : draft for public review and comment","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919184:152/3",1996,1996,"","event","plan",null,"Terminal Separator · demolished: demolished after the [name withheld] earthquake","unverified","C124919184",152,"https://archive.org/details/C124919184/page/n150",null,null,null,"Port of San Francisco waterfront land use plan : draft for public review and comment","n","a",0,2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919184:37/1",1996,1996,"","project","plan",null,"U.[name withheld] · proposes: 50-story office building on fill between the Ferry Building and the Bay Bridge","unverified","C124919184",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124919184/page/n35",null,null,null,"Port of San Francisco waterfront land use plan : draft for public review and comment","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922850:557/5",1996,1996,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"[name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: [name withheld] trips would not cause a v/c deterioration; not a significant project effect","unverified","C124922850",557,"https://archive.org/details/C124922850/page/n556","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922948:34/3",1996,1996,"1996","finding","environmental impact report",null,"Bay Bridge · finding: [name withheld] trips would not cause v/c deterioration; not a significant effect","unverified","C124922948",34,"https://archive.org/details/C124922948/page/n33","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916687:58/2",1996,1996,"December 1997","project","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge east spans retrofit · other: retrofit completion targeted","unverified","C124916687",58,"https://archive.org/details/C124916687/page/n57",null,null,null,"Community safety element : summary background report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922850:606/8",1996,1996,"year 2010","finding","environmental impact report",null,"Major roadways near Mission Bay and Presidio · finding: I-80 (Bay Bridge), I-280 and US 101 expected to operate at LOS E or F under cumulative conditions","unverified","C124922850",606,"https://archive.org/details/C124922850/page/n605","I-80 (Bay Bridge), I-280, US 101",null,null,"Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919315:11/1",1997,1997,"","site","study or report",null,"I-80 over the San Francisco - Oakland Bay Bridge · other: Key transportation corridor segment with concentrated facilities; priority for pre-earthquake planning","unverified","C124919315",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124919315/page/n10","I-80",null,null,"Riding out future quakes : pre-earthquake planning for post-earthquake transportation system recovery in the San Francisco Bay region","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919315:12/1",1997,1997,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · finding: critical transportation vulnerability (Bay Bridge and east-Bay approaches) in all scenarios except Maacama, West Napa, and Greenville earthquakes","unverified","C124919315",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124919315/page/n11",null,null,null,"Riding out future quakes : pre-earthquake planning for post-earthquake transportation system recovery in the San Francisco Bay region","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919315:121/1",1997,1997,"","finding","study or report",null,"I-80 over the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · finding: one of nine highest-concentration key facility corridors for pre-earthquake planning","unverified","C124919315",121,"https://archive.org/details/C124919315/page/n120","I-80",null,null,"Riding out future quakes : pre-earthquake planning for post-earthquake transportation system recovery in the San Francisco Bay region","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919315:135/1",1997,1997,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · finding: assume closed at least a few days","unverified","C124919315",135,"https://archive.org/details/C124919315/page/n134",null,null,null,"Riding out future quakes : pre-earthquake planning for post-earthquake transportation system recovery in the San Francisco Bay region","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919315:174/1",1997,1997,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · finding: Vulnerable with its east-Bay approaches in all scenarios except Maacama, West Napa, and Greenville earthquakes","unverified","C124919315",174,"https://archive.org/details/C124919315/page/n173",null,null,null,"Riding out future quakes : pre-earthquake planning for post-earthquake transportation system recovery in the San Francisco Bay region","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919315:87/4",1997,1997,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · finding: particularly subject to problems in the [name withheld] earthquake scenario","unverified","C124919315",87,"https://archive.org/details/C124919315/page/n86",null,null,null,"Riding out future quakes : pre-earthquake planning for post-earthquake transportation system recovery in the San Francisco Bay region","n","a",0,2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919315:99/1",1997,1997,"","finding","study or report",null,"Golden Gate Bridge and Bay Bridge · finding: may be closed, at least for a few days, after the Healdsburg-Rodgers Creek earthquake scenario","unverified","C124919315",99,"https://archive.org/details/C124919315/page/n98",null,null,null,"Riding out future quakes : pre-earthquake planning for post-earthquake transportation system recovery in the San Francisco Bay region","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922692:403/5",1997,1997,"","project","ordinance or legislation",null,"Piers 26-38 · use: break-bulk cargo handling and related shipping activities","unverified","C124922692",403,"https://archive.org/details/C124922692/page/n402",null,null,null,"San Francisco general plan : amendments to the general plan : adopted between September 1988 and July 1997","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922692:411/3",1997,1997,"","finding","ordinance or legislation",null,"Beale/Bryant-Site D · finding: No landmarks or historic buildings on the sites; views of Bay Bridge Abutment protected","unverified","C124922692",411,"https://archive.org/details/C124922692/page/n410",null,null,null,"San Francisco general plan : amendments to the general plan : adopted between September 1988 and July 1997","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919315:122/1",1997,1997,"1997","finding","study or report",null,"High-use corridor segments (2-hour peak volume) · other: I-80 over the San Francisco - Oakland Bay Bridge listed as high-use corridor segment","unverified","C124919315",122,"https://archive.org/details/C124919315/page/n121","I-80",null,null,"Riding out future quakes : pre-earthquake planning for post-earthquake transportation system recovery in the San Francisco Bay region","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceedjanapr92sanfrich:131/9",1997,1997,"1997-02-18","hearing",null,"referred","Hearing on the design and financing of the eastern Bay Bridge sent to the Economic Development Committee.","quoted","journalofproceedjanapr92sanfrich",131,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceedjanapr92sanfrich/page/n131",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceedjanapr92sanfrich:311/1",1997,1997,"1997-04-21","resolution",null,"passed","Board urged MTC and CalTrans to include a Bay Bridge bike path in the reconstruction design.","quoted","journalofproceedjanapr92sanfrich",311,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceedjanapr92sanfrich/page/n311",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjulydecproceed93sanfrich:370/7",1998,1998,null,"hearing",null,"referred","Hearing requested on proposals for the Bay Bridge alignment; received and assigned to committee.","quoted","journalofjulydecproceed93sanfrich",370,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjulydecproceed93sanfrich/page/n369",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:31/1",1998,1998,"","measure","study or report",null,"Routes south of the Bay Bridge (Ferry Terminal to SFO) · other: maximum of 40 knots","unverified","C124909173",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n30",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:31/2",1998,1998,"","measure","study or report",null,"Routes north of the Bay Bridge · other: maximum of 35 knots","unverified","C124909173",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n30",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:31/3",1998,1998,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge to Alcatraz Island route · finding: speeds of more than 35 knots are considered unrealistic for scheduling purposes","unverified","C124909173",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n30",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915258:232/4",1998,1998,"","site","environmental impact report",null,"Rincon Hill · other: Twelve-block area between Folsom Street and the Bay Bridge, and between Steuart and Second Streets","unverified","C124915258",232,"https://archive.org/details/C124915258/page/n231","Folsom Street",null,null,"Draft environmental impact statement/draft environmental impact report for the Third Street light rail project in the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915258:488/2",1998,1998,"","recommendation","environmental impact report",null,"General Plan Transportation Element, Northeastern Waterfront · recommendation: Prohibit any increase to roadway capacity along the shoreline for automobiles between the Bay Bridge-downtown area and the Golden Gate Bridge","unverified","C124915258",488,"https://archive.org/details/C124915258/page/n487",null,null,null,"Draft environmental impact statement/draft environmental impact report for the Third Street light rail project in the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915258:85/4",1998,1998,"","alternative","environmental impact report",null,"Bay Bridge Approach and Terminal Separator Ramps · alternative: seismic upgrade and reconfiguration","unverified","C124915258",85,"https://archive.org/details/C124915258/page/n84",null,null,null,"Draft environmental impact statement/draft environmental impact report for the Third Street light rail project in the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:6/4",2000,1998,"1998","event","study or report",null,"1998 Bay Bridge rail ballot measure · event: non-binding declaration of policy passed by voters in San Francisco that rail service should be restored to the Bay Bridge","unverified","C124925065",6,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n5",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed93sanfrich:23/8",1998,1998,"1998-01-05","hearing",null,"referred","Hearing on retrofitting the western Bay Bridge approach was referred to Economic Development, Transportation and Technology Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed93sanfrich",23,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed93sanfrich/page/n22",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjulydecproceed93sanfrich|451",1998,1998,"1998-12-21","resolution","civic-life","referred","Caltrans urged to put passenger rail on a rebuilt Bay Bridge","quoted","journalofjulydecproceed93sanfrich",518,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjulydecproceed93sanfrich/page/n517",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich:181/4",1999,1999,null,"resolution","transit","referred","Resolution urging the Metropolitan Transportation Commission not to approve financing for the Bay Area Rapid Transit extension that diverts Bay Bridge toll revenue from Muni.","quoted","journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich",181,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich/page/n180",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich:201/1",1999,1999,null,"resolution","transit","passed","Resolution urges City, MTC and Caltrans to keep passenger rail in the Bay Bridge redesign; adopted.","quoted","journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich",201,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich/page/n200",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.4],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich:240/2",1999,1999,null,"resolution","transit","referred","Resolution urging regional transit commission to reject a BART financing plan that diverts Bay Bridge tolls from Muni was referred to committee.","quoted","journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich",240,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich/page/n239",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/1minutes199899sanf:77/3",1999,1999,"1998-03-03","hearing",null,"continued","Supervisor Yaki's hearing on retrofitting the western Bay Bridge approach was held and continued to the Call of the Chair.","quoted","1minutes199899sanf",77,"https://archive.org/details/1minutes199899sanf/page/n76",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124923818:280/4",2000,1999,"1999","project","plan",null,"Bay Bridge Rail Service · cost usd: $3 Billion to $3.3 Billion bridge structural cost (light rail alternative)","unverified","C124923818",280,"https://archive.org/details/C124923818/page/n279",null,null,null,"Bay area transportation blueprint for the 21st century. Project notebook of candidate projects","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124923818:46/1",2000,1999,"1999","project","plan",null,"San Francisco/Oakland Bay Bridge West Span bike/pedestrian path · cost usd: $65 million","unverified","C124923818",46,"https://archive.org/details/C124923818/page/n45",null,null,null,"Bay area transportation blueprint for the 21st century. Project notebook of candidate projects","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124923818:48/2",2000,1999,"1999","project","plan",null,"Local Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - San Francisco · cost usd: $30 million (1999$)","unverified","C124923818",48,"https://archive.org/details/C124923818/page/n47",null,null,null,"Bay area transportation blueprint for the 21st century. Project notebook of candidate projects","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:12/1",2000,1999,"1999","measure","study or report",null,"Transbay rail service using the Bay Bridge · cost usd: about $5 Billion to as much as $9 Billion (total capital costs)","unverified","C124925065",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n11",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:19/1",2000,1999,"1999","alternative","study or report",null,"Alternative A - Light Rail Service Alignment ([name withheld]) · other: 15 minute headway on each line, staggered to provide a 5 minute headway across Bay Bridge","unverified","C124925065",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n18",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:71/1",2000,1999,"1999","alternative","study or report",null,"[name withheld] · cost usd: $1.6 - $1.8 billion total","unverified","C124925065",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n70",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:71/2",2000,1999,"1999","alternative","study or report",null,"BART Transbay Bridge · cost usd: $1.94 billion total","unverified","C124925065",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n70",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:71/3",2000,1999,"1999","alternative","study or report",null,"Basic Bridge Railroad · cost usd: $918 million total","unverified","C124925065",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n70",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:71/4",2000,1999,"1999","alternative","study or report",null,"Aggressive Bridge Railroad · cost usd: $4.77 billion total","unverified","C124925065",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n70",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:71/5",2000,1999,"1999","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail implementation · cost usd: between $4 billion and $9 billion","unverified","C124925065",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n70",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich:211/1",1999,1999,"1999-02-22","resolution","transit","continued","Resolution urging the Metropolitan Transportation Commission not to approve BART financing that diverts Bay Bridge toll revenue from Muni was continued to March 8.","quoted","journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich",211,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich/page/n210",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalaprjuneofproceed94sanfrich:310/5",1999,1999,"1999-06-01","hearing",null,"referred","Hearing on planning and mitigation for the Bay Bridge West Span and Bayshore Freeway projects was assigned to the Transportation and Land Use Committee.","quoted","journalaprjuneofproceed94sanfrich",310,"https://archive.org/details/journalaprjuneofproceed94sanfrich/page/n309",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:83/1",2000,1999,"October 1999","measure","study or report",null,"BART Bay Bridge alternative · cost usd: $120 million per mile (illustrative capital cost, 1999 dollars)","unverified","C124925065",83,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n82",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922708:97/1",2000,2000,"","project","plan",null,"San Francisco Oakland Bay Bridge Seismic Retrofit · cost usd: $210 million, fully funded","unverified","C124922708",97,"https://archive.org/details/C124922708/page/n96","5th Street",null,null,"San Francisco countywide transportation plan : draft for public review","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922708:97/2",2000,2000,"","project","plan",null,"San Francisco Oakland Bay Bridge Seismic Retrofit West span · cost usd: estimated $350 million, fully funded","unverified","C124922708",97,"https://archive.org/details/C124922708/page/n96",null,null,null,"San Francisco countywide transportation plan : draft for public review","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922708:97/3",2000,2000,"","project","plan",null,"San Francisco Oakland Bay Bridge Seismic Retrofit Eastern Span replacement · cost usd: estimated $1.5 billion, under design","unverified","C124922708",97,"https://archive.org/details/C124922708/page/n96",null,null,null,"San Francisco countywide transportation plan : draft for public review","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124923818:278/1",2000,2000,"","project","plan",null,"Expand AC Transit and Golden Gate Transit Transbay Service · proposes: More frequent service and mid-day service on several AC Transit Bay Bridge Transbay lines","unverified","C124923818",278,"https://archive.org/details/C124923818/page/n277",null,null,null,"Bay area transportation blueprint for the 21st century. Project notebook of candidate projects","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124923818:280/3",2000,2000,"","project","plan",null,"Bay Bridge Rail Service · proposes: Rail service from Transbay Terminal vicinity in San Francisco across the Bay Bridge to the East Bay","unverified","C124923818",280,"https://archive.org/details/C124923818/page/n279",null,null,null,"Bay area transportation blueprint for the 21st century. Project notebook of candidate projects","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124923818:46/2",2000,2000,"","project","plan",null,"San Francisco/Oakland Bay Bridge West Span bike/pedestrian path · other: State legislation authorized bridge tolls for west span bike/pedestrian path; Transbay Terminal improvements compete for same funds","unverified","C124923818",46,"https://archive.org/details/C124923818/page/n45",null,null,null,"Bay area transportation blueprint for the 21st century. Project notebook of candidate projects","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:15/4",2000,2000,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge west spans · finding: Demands on some structural components reported higher than actual impacts because train lengths are much less than span","unverified","C124925065",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n14",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:16/1",2000,2000,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Alternative A, Bay Bridge Light Rail · alternative: [name withheld], operating from the Transbay Terminal","unverified","C124925065",16,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n15",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","m",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:16/2",2000,2000,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Alternative A, Bay Bridge Light Rail · other: Light rail trains share the bus deck with transbay buses","unverified","C124925065",16,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n15",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:24/3",2000,2000,"","alternative","study or report",null,"BART Bridge Rail extension · proposes: BART line over the Bay Bridge to the Transbay Terminal upper level","unverified","C124925065",24,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n23",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:28/2",2000,2000,"","finding","study or report",null,"Richmond Transbay Line · other: peak headway shortened from 15 to 10 minutes","unverified","C124925065",28,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n27",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-3.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:28/3",2000,2000,"","finding","study or report",null,"Richmond Transbay Line · other: six 10-car trains per hour across Bay Bridge in each direction","unverified","C124925065",28,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n27",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:28/4",2000,2000,"","finding","study or report",null,"Richmond Transbay Line · other: delivered capacity of 6120 passengers per peak hour per direction","unverified","C124925065",28,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n27",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:30/1",2000,2000,"","measure","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail alternative · proposes: high speed and commuter trains share the same tracks at conventional speeds from Fourth and Townsend to Transbay Terminal and over the Bay Bridge","unverified","C124925065",30,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n29","Fourth and Townsend Streets",null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:30/3",2000,2000,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail alternative · proposes: A and B trains extended via the Bay Bridge to a West Oakland station near the Toll Plaza","unverified","C124925065",30,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n29","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:30/4",2000,2000,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail alternative · other: high speed trains operate on a 30-minute headway in both directions","unverified","C124925065",30,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n29","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:46/1",2000,2000,"","project","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge West spans · other: post-retrofit West spans studied for rail impacts","unverified","C124925065",46,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n45",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:46/2",2000,2000,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge West span superstructure · finding: worst case: strength of only a few members increased by 12%, remainder by less or not at all","unverified","C124925065",46,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n45",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:47/10001",2000,2000,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study: below deck option · alternative: Adds two lanes to the bridge below the current lower deck","unverified","C124925065",47,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n46",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:48/2",2000,2000,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study: rail service on the bridge deck · other: If two directions of rail service are placed on the bridge deck, a minimum of three traffic lanes would be displaced","unverified","C124925065",48,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n47",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:48/3",2000,2000,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study: West span stiffening truss · recommendation: Replace at least three traffic lanes above, below or beside the West span stiffening truss","unverified","C124925065",48,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n47",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:48/4",2000,2000,"","agency","study or report",null,"United States Coast Guard · other: Must approve any reductions in vertical clearance of the bridge","unverified","C124925065",48,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n47",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:54/1",2000,2000,"","building","study or report",null,"Building north of SF anchorage, Bay Bridge · other: Air rights given; building as tall as the bridge","unverified","C124925065",54,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n53",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:54/2",2000,2000,"","project","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge West Span rail · other: Adding 34 feet of deck is the minimum width for bi-directional train operation","unverified","C124925065",54,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n53",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:54/3",2000,2000,"","measure","study or report",null,"Below deck rail option, Bay Bridge · other: Maintenance clearance below lower deck will further encroach on shipping clearances","unverified","C124925065",54,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n53",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:58/1",2000,2000,"","building","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge West spans · other: 3/4-inch epoxy overlay installed by Caltrans","unverified","C124925065",58,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n57",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:62/1",2000,2000,"","project","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge proposed East Spans · proposes: replace the East spans","unverified","C124925065",62,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n61",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:62/2",2000,2000,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge proposed East Spans · other: five lanes and no shoulders with 11'10\" lanes, if approved by reviewing agencies","unverified","C124925065",62,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n61",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:62/3",2000,2000,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge West spans · other: current lane width of 11'7\"","unverified","C124925065",62,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n61",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:62/4",2000,2000,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge proposed East Spans · other: current design live load of 1,400 pounds per linear foot of rail for four lanes and one track","unverified","C124925065",62,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n61",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:62/5",2000,2000,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge proposed East Spans · other: 27% increase in live load with heaviest rail alternative and five lanes","unverified","C124925065",62,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n61",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:62/6",2000,2000,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge proposed East Spans · other: 8% increase in live load with lightest rail option","unverified","C124925065",62,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n61",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:62/7",2000,2000,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail alignment on exterior of East span decks · other: main benefit of exterior rail is on the eastern side of Yerba Buena Island","unverified","C124925065",62,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n61",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:62/8",2000,2000,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge West spans rail alignment · other: place track outside the West spans to keep five lanes together in each direction","unverified","C124925065",62,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n61",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:66/1",2000,2000,"","building","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge East spans deck · other: 59'4\" design width","unverified","C124925065",66,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n65",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:66/2",2000,2000,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge East spans deck · finding: deck should be widened to accommodate the full five lanes","unverified","C124925065",66,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n65",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:8/4",2000,2000,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail service · finding: No rail services would travel at high speeds over the bridge, particularly over the West spans","unverified","C124925065",8,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n7",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:83/5",2000,2000,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART Bay Bridge alternative · other: 40% contingency; capital cost considered conjectural","unverified","C124925065",83,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n82",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922081:182/2",1984,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · other: peak period expected to grow from two hours to a three hour peak period","unverified","C124922081",182,"https://archive.org/details/C124922081/page/n181",null,null,null,"Regional plan for San Francisco Bay Area naval shore activities : functional systems analyses/regional issues and options report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124923818:275/1",2000,2000,"2000","project","plan",null,"New Westbound and Eastbound Ramps to I-80 (Bay Bridge) from Treasure Island · proposes: New westbound and eastbound ramps to I-80 (Bay Bridge) from Treasure Island","unverified","C124923818",275,"https://archive.org/details/C124923818/page/n274",null,null,null,"Bay area transportation blueprint for the 21st century. Project notebook of candidate projects","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124923818:300/3",2000,2000,"2000","project","plan",null,"New Westbound and Eastbound Ramps to I-80 (Bay Bridge) · proposes: New ramps to I-80 (Bay Bridge) from Treasure Island","unverified","C124923818",300,"https://archive.org/details/C124923818/page/n299",null,null,null,"Bay area transportation blueprint for the 21st century. Project notebook of candidate projects","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:10/3",2000,2000,"2000","measure","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge structural improvements · cost usd: about $3 Billion, regardless of the technology selected","unverified","C124925065",10,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n9","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:11/1",2000,2000,"2000","project","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail service · cost usd: Costs range from about $1 Billion to as much as over $4 Billion (exclusive of bridge costs)","unverified","C124925065",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n10","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:17/1",2000,2000,"2000","alternative","study or report",null,"Alternative A — Bay Bridge Light Rail · proposes: three illustrative light rail lines from Transbay Terminal to the East Bay","unverified","C124925065",17,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n16",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:21/1",2000,2000,"2000","project","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge light rail alternative · cost usd: estimated $1.4 billion (infrastructure, excluding light rail vehicles)","unverified","C124925065",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n20",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:21/2",2000,2000,"2000","project","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge light rail alternative · other: 36.3 track miles; three routes totaling 56.1 route miles","unverified","C124925065",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n20",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:21/3",2000,2000,"2000","project","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge light rail alternative · other: capacity 3,000 to 4,500 passengers per peak hour per direction","unverified","C124925065",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n20",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:34/1",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility · finding: Special fastenings may be required for the Bay Bridge, depending on how the structure is modified for rail","unverified","C124925065",34,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n33",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:34/2",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility · finding: The train traffic on the Bay Bridge can be handled through an extension of [name withheld] dispatching territories","unverified","C124925065",34,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n33",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:35/2",2000,2000,"2000","measure","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: approximately 50 mph assumed speed","unverified","C124925065",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n34",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:36/3",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail crossing · other: 15-minute headway on the Bridge","unverified","C124925065",36,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n35",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:36/4",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail crossing · other: 6600 passengers per peak","unverified","C124925065",36,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n35",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:42/2",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: maximum assumed train speed approximately 50 mph","unverified","C124925065",42,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n41",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:44/2",2000,2000,"2000","project","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge aggressive rail alternative · other: Sacramento-to-San Jose service would operate via the Bay Bridge and the Transbay Terminal","unverified","C124925065",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n43",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:44/3",2000,2000,"2000","project","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge aggressive rail alternative · other: 13 EMU sets required for the service pattern","unverified","C124925065",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n43",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:44/4",2000,2000,"2000","project","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge aggressive rail alternative · other: 78 married pairs of EMU cars inclusive of spares","unverified","C124925065",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n43",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:45/2",2000,2000,"2000","alternative","study or report",null,"BART · other: Loaded rail car weight 1,170 lbs per linear foot; rough envelope 14 ft by 16 ft single track","unverified","C124925065",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n44",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:45/3",2000,2000,"2000","alternative","study or report",null,"Caltrain - Current System · other: Loaded rail car weight 1,900 lbs per linear foot; rough envelope 26 ft by 17 ft single track","unverified","C124925065",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n44",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:47/1",2000,2000,"2000","alternative","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility - west spans rail options · alternative: three viable options: adding lanes below deck, alongside lower deck, alongside upper deck","unverified","C124925065",47,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n46",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:47/2",2000,2000,"2000","alternative","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge below deck rail option · proposes: adds two lanes below the current lower deck","unverified","C124925065",47,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n46",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:47/3",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility options · finding: lanes were added in all cases so capacity is not removed from the bridge","unverified","C124925065",47,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n46",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:49/1",2000,2000,"2000","alternative","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility: Lower Side by Side option · alternative: Adds bi-directional rail service by symmetrically widening the stiffening truss on either side of the lower deck","unverified","C124925065",49,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n48",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:49/2",2000,2000,"2000","measure","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility: Lower Side by Side option · other: If auto traffic is placed outside the current truss, four lanes would be replaced","unverified","C124925065",49,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n48",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:50/1",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail side-by-side options · finding: Side-by-side rail options are unable to drop down to the basement level of Transbay Terminal, the preferred rail station location","unverified","C124925065",50,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n49",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:54/10001",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study · other: Adding 34 feet of deck is the minimum width required for bi-directional train operation on the West spans","unverified","C124925065",54,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n53",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:55/2",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study · other: Any one of the four rail options would have a negative impact on the main span and side spans of the Bay Bridge","unverified","C124925065",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n54",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:55/3",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study · other: Loads on the main span would increase by between 55% and 61%, depending on the technology selected",null,"C124925065",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n54",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:55/4",2000,2000,"2000","measure","study or report",null,"BART rail option on Bay Bridge West spans · other: Total added load per rail, BART","unverified","C124925065",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n54",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:55/5",2000,2000,"2000","measure","study or report",null,"[name withheld] option on Bay Bridge West spans · other: Total added load per rail, [name withheld]","unverified","C124925065",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n54",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:55/6",2000,2000,"2000","measure","study or report",null,"[name withheld] (SEPTA) option on Bay Bridge West spans · other: Total added load per rail, [name withheld] (SEPTA)","unverified","C124925065",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n54",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:55/7",2000,2000,"2000","measure","study or report",null,"[name withheld] (Amtrak) option on Bay Bridge West spans · other: Total added load per rail, [name withheld] (Amtrak)","unverified","C124925065",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n54",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:57/1",2000,2000,"2000","building","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge west span · finding: Structure would require strengthening under rail load increases","unverified","C124925065",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n56",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:57/2",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge west span members · finding: Demand/capacity ratios for west span members with rail and added deck area","unverified","C124925065",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n56",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:57/3",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge main cable · finding: Insufficient main cable capacity is one of the greatest strength obstacles in a suspension bridge","unverified","C124925065",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n56",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:57/4",2000,2000,"2000","alternative","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge lower deck · alternative: Replace normal weight concrete on lower deck south side with lightweight concrete","unverified","C124925065",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n56",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:58/2",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge roadway deck with orthotropic steel deck · finding: increase of between 25% and 31% in load on main cable and suspender cables","unverified","C124925065",58,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n57",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:58/3",2000,2000,"2000","building","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge roadway current deck system · other: Current: 8-inch lightweight concrete throughout except normal weight concrete on south side of lower deck, 90 lb per sq ft average","unverified","C124925065",58,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n57",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:6/3",2000,2000,"2000","project","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge West spans seismic strengthening · other: Strengthening of the West spans is already underway","unverified","C124925065",6,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n5",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:60/1",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail service · finding: weight savings from lightweight decking are insufficient to eliminate strengthening or supplementing the main suspension cables","unverified","C124925065",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n59",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:60/10001",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge West Span · finding: significant seismic impacts requiring further retrofit","unverified","C124925065",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n59",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:60/2",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail service · finding: significant seismic impacts, requiring further retrofit",null,"C124925065",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n59",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:61/2",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge West Span stiffening truss · other: weight would increase by roughly 50%","unverified","C124925065",61,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n60",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:61/3",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge West Span dampers · finding: energy dissipating dampers of current retrofit would be inappropriate for a revised West span","unverified","C124925065",61,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n60",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:61/4",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge West Span foundations and anchorages · finding: increased foundation demands and foundation and anchorage retrofits are a likely possibility","unverified","C124925065",61,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n60",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:63/1",2000,2000,"2000","alternative","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge East Span · proposes: 5 lane design","unverified","C124925065",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n62",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:63/2",2000,2000,"2000","alternative","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge East Span · proposes: 4 lane design with light rail","unverified","C124925065",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n62",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:67/5",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge deck transition east of Yerba Buena Island · finding: vertical and horizontal geometry extremely tight","unverified","C124925065",67,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n66",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:68/1",2000,2000,"2000","measure","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge East spans · cost usd: $1,000 per square foot for the suspension spans","unverified","C124925065",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n67",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:68/2",2000,2000,"2000","measure","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge East spans · cost usd: $650 per square foot for the viaduct spans","unverified","C124925065",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n67",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:68/3",2000,2000,"2000","measure","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge West spans · cost usd: values of $2,000 per square foot are appropriate","unverified","C124925065",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n67",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:68/4",2000,2000,"2000","measure","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge West spans · cost usd: over $1 billion in investment on that span alone","unverified","C124925065",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n67",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:68/5",2000,2000,"2000","measure","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail alternatives · cost usd: between $3 billion and $3.3 billion, exclusive of rail infrastructure","unverified","C124925065",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n67",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:69/1",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility structural cost estimate (East span) · other: East span costs based on revisions to the design prior to awarding the construction contract","unverified","C124925065",69,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n68",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:7/3",2000,2000,"2000","project","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study · other: Seismically retrofitted West spans considered for the study","unverified","C124925065",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n6",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:73/3",2000,2000,"2000","building","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge · other: Small allowance for LRT-specific work on the Bay Bridge","unverified","C124925065",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n72",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:78/1",2000,2000,"2000","alternative","study or report",null,"Eastbay-only Transbay LRT system with Bay Bridge LRT link added later · alternative: Eastbay-only system first, with connections to The City provided by BART, then Bay Bridge LRT link added later","unverified","C124925065",78,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n77","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:79/1",2000,2000,"2000","alternative","study or report",null,"Alternative A - Bay Bridge light rail · alternative: estimated link miles and running times","unverified","C124925065",79,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n78","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:81/1",2000,2000,"2000","alternative","study or report",null,"Alternative A light rail transit, Bay Bridge aerial structures · cost usd: Bay Bridge $1,000/[name withheld] allowance for special LRT work outside general bridge rehab/rebuild","unverified","C124925065",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n80",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:84/1",2000,2000,"2000","measure","study or report",null,"BART Bay Bridge alternative (MacArthur - Transbay Terminal) · cost usd: $1.943 billion illustrative order of magnitude capital cost","unverified","C124925065",84,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n83",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","m",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:87/1",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility · finding: Feasible to incorporate any rail technology on the Bay Bridge, but at very high cost","unverified","C124925065",87,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n86",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:87/2",2000,2000,"2000","measure","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge west spans structural improvements · cost usd: as high as $3 Billion","unverified","C124925065",87,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n86",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:87/3",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge west spans · finding: West spans retrofitted but not replaced under the current plan","unverified","C124925065",87,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n86",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:87/5",2000,2000,"2000","recommendation","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility · recommendation: Full multi-modal corridor study comparing rail on the Bay Bridge to other transbay projects","unverified","C124925065",87,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n86",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:88/2",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail on deck · finding: Structurally feasible; no highway operations assessment completed","unverified","C124925065",88,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n87",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:88/3",2000,2000,"2000","recommendation","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail crossing · recommendation: More detailed study of the bridge structures is required","unverified","C124925065",88,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n87",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:88/4",2000,2000,"2000","action","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail alignment · other: Define required realignment of roadway ramps and rail alignment into San Francisco","unverified","C124925065",88,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n87",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:9/1",2000,2000,"2000","alternative","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge West Spans rail · alternative: Rail suspended below the current lower deck","unverified","C124925065",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n8",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:9/2",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge West Spans · finding: None of the rail alternatives is considered infeasible","unverified","C124925065",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n8",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:9/3",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge West Spans main cable · finding: Strengthening of main cable anticipated; two new main suspension cables or new tower legs needed","unverified","C124925065",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n8",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:9/4",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge West Spans seismic · finding: Seismic improvements beyond the current retrofit would be necessary","unverified","C124925065",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n8",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:9/5",2000,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge East Span · finding: Design has room for five traffic lanes and one rail lane per direction but lacks structural strength for that load","unverified","C124925065",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n8",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:9/6",2000,2000,"2000","recommendation","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge East Span rail · recommendation: Move rails to the outside of the decks to allow crossing YBI and new tunnel bores","unverified","C124925065",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n8",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2000sanf_1:29/3",2000,2000,"2000-09-18","hearing",null,"referred","Supervisor Becerril asked for a hearing on traffic and parking impacts of the Bay Bridge western approach retrofit; referred to committee.","quoted","meetingminutesb2000sanf_1",29,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2000sanf_1/page/n28",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingseptdecminutes95sanfrich:31/3",2000,2000,"2000-09-18","hearing",null,"referred","Supervisor Becerril requested a hearing on the Bay Bridge western approach retrofit's traffic and parking impacts; referred to committee.","quoted","meetingseptdecminutes95sanfrich",31,"https://archive.org/details/meetingseptdecminutes95sanfrich/page/n28",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124923818:280/2",2000,2000,"April, 1999","action","plan",null,"Bay Bridge Rail Service feasibility study · lead agency: MTC initiated study to assess feasibility of rail services on the Bay Bridge","unverified","C124923818",280,"https://archive.org/details/C124923818/page/n279",null,null,null,"Bay area transportation blueprint for the 21st century. Project notebook of candidate projects","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124923818:280/5",2000,2000,"April, 2000","event","plan",null,"Bay Bridge Rail Service feasibility study · event: Final feasibility study of rail on the Bay Bridge to be released","unverified","C124923818",280,"https://archive.org/details/C124923818/page/n279",null,null,null,"Bay area transportation blueprint for the 21st century. Project notebook of candidate projects","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:12/2",2000,2000,"July 2000","finding","study or report",null,"Transbay rail service on the Bay Bridge · finding: implementing [name withheld] service is feasible but represents an enormous investment","unverified","C124925065",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n11",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:12/3",2000,2000,"July 2000","recommendation","study or report",null,"Transbay rail service on the Bay Bridge · recommendation: a more inclusive corridor study is required to compare alternatives","unverified","C124925065",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n11",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:53/1",2000,2000,"July 2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail, below deck option · finding: Below deck option appears preferable because of the flexibility it offers at Transbay Terminal","unverified","C124925065",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n52",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:53/2",2000,2000,"July 2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail, below deck option · finding: Below deck is the only option that can access the basement of Transbay Terminal","unverified","C124925065",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n52",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:53/4",2000,2000,"July 2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail, below deck option · finding: Below deck option will minimize impacts to ramps on Yerba Buena Island and in San Francisco","unverified","C124925065",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n52",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:53/6",2000,2000,"July 2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail, upper side by side option · finding: New tunnel bores on each side of the existing tunnel at Yerba Buena Island","unverified","C124925065",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n52",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:55/10001",2000,2000,"July 2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study · finding: any one of these options would have a negative impact on the main span and side spans of the Bay Bridge","unverified","C124925065",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n54",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:55/10002",2000,2000,"July 2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge main span · finding: loads on the main span would increase by between 55% and 61%, depending on the technology selected","unverified","C124925065",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n54",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:55/10003",2000,2000,"July 2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge west spans rail load · other: Total added load per rail: BART 13,560; [name withheld] 14,000; [name withheld] (SEPTA) 14,660; [name withheld] (Amtrak) 14,820","unverified","C124925065",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n54",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:65/1",2000,2000,"July 2000","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge East span · finding: Rail and catenary clearances for all train scenarios except BART would interfere with the suspender cables unless shoulders are reduced","unverified","C124925065",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n64",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:65/2",2000,2000,"July 2000","recommendation","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge East span · recommendation: Widen the deck to move the suspender cables outward and provide the necessary clearance","unverified","C124925065",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n64",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:80/1",2000,2000,"July 2000","project","study or report",null,"Alternative A - Bay Bridge Eastbay Light Rail System · other: pro-forma timetable lists a City Hall stop in the westbound and eastbound schedules","unverified","C124925065",80,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n79",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:64/1",2000,2000,"Juty 2000","site","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge east span rail alignment · other: Rail alignment of the east span's exterior rail to below the Yerba Buena Island tunnel (Figure 3-19)","unverified","C124925065",64,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n63",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124923818:280/1",2000,2000,"November, 1998","event","plan",null,"Bay Bridge Rail Service · event: Bay Bridge passenger rail advisory measures passed in Berkeley, Emeryville, Oakland and San Francisco","unverified","C124923818",280,"https://archive.org/details/C124923818/page/n279",null,null,null,"Bay area transportation blueprint for the 21st century. Project notebook of candidate projects","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:132/3",2002,2001,"2001","project","environmental impact report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge east span replacement · approved: 11,526 foot new east span approved by FHWA and Caltrans","unverified","C101747471",132,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n131",null,null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","m",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:365/1",2002,2001,"2001","project","environmental impact report",null,"SFOBB east span replacement · approved: approved by FHWA and Caltrans; dismantle existing east span","unverified","C101747471",365,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n364",null,null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2001sanf:271/4",2001,2001,"2001-03-05","hearing",null,"referred","Hearing requested on city coordination with Caltrans over the western span seismic retrofit of the Bay Bridge.","quoted","meetingminutesbo2001sanf",271,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2001sanf/page/n270",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesjanapr96sanfrich:273/4",2001,2001,"2001-03-05","hearing","transit","referred","A hearing was requested on the city's coordination with Caltrans over the western Bay Bridge seismic retrofit and traffic mitigation.","quoted","meetingminutesjanapr96sanfrich",273,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesjanapr96sanfrich/page/n268",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2001sanf_0:443/1",2001,2001,"2001-08-13","hearing",null,"referred","Newsom requested a hearing on parking lost to Bay Bridge approach retrofit work; referred to the Housing, Transportation and Land Use Committee.","quoted","meetingminutesb2001sanf_0",443,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2001sanf_0/page/n442",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesmayaug96sanfrich:447/1",2001,2001,"2001-08-13","hearing",null,"referred","Supervisor Newsom's hearing request on parking loss from Bay Bridge retrofit work was referred to the Housing, Transportation and Land Use Committee.","quoted","meetingminutesmayaug96sanfrich",447,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesmayaug96sanfrich/page/n442",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:211/5",2002,2002,"","measure","environmental impact report",null,"San Francisco Water Department 10-inch main · other: maximum pump rate of 1,750 gallons per minute","unverified","C101747471",211,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n210",null,null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:250/1",2002,2002,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"Reuse Plan views from the eastern landfall of the SFOBB · finding: Impact not significant because of relatively low levels of use at this location","unverified","C101747471",250,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n249",null,null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:250/2",2002,2002,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"Proposed hotel buildings, Treasure Island reuse plan · finding: Hotel buildings would at least partially block Golden Gate Bridge views for up to two minutes for westbound SFOBB passengers","unverified","C101747471",250,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n249",null,null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-3.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:269/1",2002,2002,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge (SFOBB)/I-80 · finding: SFOBB operated, operates and will continue to operate at or above capacity","unverified","C101747471",269,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n268","SFOBB/I-80",null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:301/1",2002,2002,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"Disposal and reuse of NSTI, Alternative 1 traffic noise · finding: traffic added to SFOBB would not cause a noticeable change in freeway noise levels","unverified","C101747471",301,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n300","SFOBB",null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:365/4",2002,2002,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"SFOBB · finding: projected to be at capacity during peak hours in the future, with or without reuse","unverified","C101747471",365,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n364",null,null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:539/3",2002,2002,"","project","environmental impact report",null,"SFOBB east span replacement · proposes: new replacement span constructed in place of the existing bridge","unverified","C101747471",539,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n538",null,null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:559/1",2002,2002,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"SFOBB / I-80 Eastbound mainline, Existing AM peak · finding: LOS F, 4 mph","unverified","C101747471",559,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n558","I-80 Eastbound",null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:559/2",2002,2002,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"SFOBB / I-80 Eastbound mainline, Existing AM peak · finding: LOS E, 45 mph","unverified","C101747471",559,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n558","I-80 Eastbound",null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:559/3",2002,2002,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"SFOBB / I-80 Eastbound mainline, No Action AM peak · finding: LOS F, 21 mph","unverified","C101747471",559,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n558","I-80 Eastbound",null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:305/5",2002,2002,"2002","finding","environmental impact report",null,"Naval Station Treasure Island reuse, Alternative 2 freeway traffic noise · finding: traffic added to the SFOBB would not cause a noticeable change; noise increase less than one-tenth of an A-weighted decibel","unverified","C101747471",305,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n304","San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge",null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915258:87/6",1998,2002,"2002","project","environmental impact report",null,"Bay Bridge approach and Terminal Separator ramps · lead agency: Caltrans; seismic upgrade and rebuilt ramps","unverified","C124915258",87,"https://archive.org/details/C124915258/page/n86",null,null,null,"Draft environmental impact statement/draft environmental impact report for the Third Street light rail project in the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesjanmay97sanfrich:28/1",2002,2002,"2002-01-07","resolution","water-sewers","referred","Proposed purchase of a permanent easement at Main and Bryant Streets for $650,000 (≈ $1.2 million in 2026 dollars) for the Bay Bridge Pump Station, referred to Finance Committee.","quoted","meetingminutesjanmay97sanfrich",28,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesjanmay97sanfrich/page/n27",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2002sanf:270/4",2002,2002,"2002-03-18","resolution","transit","referred","Resolution urging the state Legislature to create a congestion pricing program for the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge was sent to committee.","quoted","meetingminutesbo2002sanf",270,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2002sanf/page/n269",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesjanmay97sanfrich:270/4",2002,2002,"2002-03-18","resolution","transit","referred","Board urges the state or Bay Area counties to set congestion pricing on the Bay Bridge; sent to Transportation and Commerce Committee.","quoted","meetingminutesjanmay97sanfrich",270,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesjanmay97sanfrich/page/n269",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2002sanf:504/4",2002,2002,"2002-05-20","hearing",null,"referred","Supervisor Sandoval's proposed hearing on Bay Bridge congestion pricing tolls was assigned to the Rules and Audits Committee.","quoted","meetingminutesbo2002sanf",504,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2002sanf/page/n503",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesjanmay97sanfrich:504/4",2002,2002,"2002-05-20","hearing",null,"referred","Hearing on congestion pricing tolls for the Bay Bridge was received and assigned to the Rules and Audits Committee.","quoted","meetingminutesjanmay97sanfrich",504,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesjanmay97sanfrich/page/n503",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjuneaugminutes97sanfrich|g951",2002,2002,"2002-07-22","ballot_measure","traffic","rejected","Bridge congestion-pricing vote for November ballot turned down.","quoted","meetingjuneaugminutes97sanfrich",273,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjuneaugminutes97sanfrich/page/n272",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,6.24],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjuneaugminutes97sanfrich|g961",2002,2002,"2002-07-22","resolution","traffic","passed","City urges state to add congestion charges on Bay Bridge.","quoted","meetingjuneaugminutes97sanfrich",275,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjuneaugminutes97sanfrich/page/n274",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.99],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjuneaugminutes97sanfrich|g962",2002,2002,"2002-07-22",null,"traffic","passed","City urges state to add congestion charges on Bay Bridge.","unverified","meetingjuneaugminutes97sanfrich",275,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjuneaugminutes97sanfrich/page/n274",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.01],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2002sanf_0:273/3",2002,2002,"2002-07-22","ballot_measure","whats-being-built","refused","Board refused to put a congestion pricing policy for Bay Bridge tolls to voters on the November 5, 2002 ballot.","quoted","meetingminutesb2002sanf_0",273,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2002sanf_0/page/n272",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,5.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2002sanf_0:275/3",2002,2002,"2002-07-22","resolution",null,"passed","Board adopted a resolution urging state or regional legislation to create congestion pricing for the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.","quoted","meetingminutesb2002sanf_0",275,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2002sanf_0/page/n274",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.88],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2003:149/6",2003,2002,"2002-2003","property_record","annual report",null,"Bay Bridge Pump Station · owned by city: not printed on page","unverified","igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2003",149,"https://archive.org/details/igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2003/page/n148","MAIN ST",null,null,"Real property owned by the city and county of San Francisco / 2003","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:125/4",2002,2002,"August 6, 1999","building","environmental impact report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge (SFOBB) · historic rating: nominated for listing in the NRHP","unverified","C101747471",125,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n124",null,null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:359/6",2002,2002,"July 11, 2001","alternative","environmental impact report",null,"SFOBB East Spans Seismic Safety Project · approved: Replacement Alternative N-6 with self-anchored suspension bridge design option selected","unverified","C101747471",359,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n358",null,null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:359/7",2002,2002,"July 11, 2001","alternative","environmental impact report",null,"SFOBB East Spans Seismic Safety Project · alternative: Replacement Alternative N-6 with the self-anchored suspension bridge design option","unverified","C101747471",359,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n358",null,null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:120/7",2002,2002,"mid-1930s","event","environmental impact report",null,"San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge · built: Constructed, with Yerba Buena Island as center anchorage","unverified","C101747471",120,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n119",null,null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","m",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2004:140/5",2004,2003,"2003-2004","property_record","annual report",null,"BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION (EASEMENT) · owned by city: City and County of San Francisco","unverified","igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2004",140,"https://archive.org/details/igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2004/page/n139","BRYANT ST",null,null,"Real property owned by the city and county of San Francisco / 2004","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2003:66/6",2003,2003,"FY 2002-2003","property_record","annual report",null,"HALL OF JUSTICE BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION (EASEMENT) · owned by city: PUC/Clean Water","unverified","igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2003",66,"https://archive.org/details/igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2003/page/n65","MAIN ST",null,null,"Real property owned by the city and county of San Francisco / 2003","n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2004sanf_2:331/3",2004,2004,null,"resolution",null,"continued","Resolution urging Caltrans to name new Bay Bridge additions after [name withheld] was continued to December 14, 2004.","quoted","meetingminutesb2004sanf_2",331,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2004sanf_2/page/n330",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2004sanf_2:374/2",2004,2004,null,"resolution",null,"passed","Board urged Caltrans and state legislators to name the new Bay Bridge additions in honor of [name withheld]","quoted","meetingminutesb2004sanf_2",374,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2004sanf_2/page/n373",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2004:151/1",2004,2004,"","property_record","annual report",null,"BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION (EASEMENT) · owned by city: City and County of San Francisco","unverified","igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2004",151,"https://archive.org/details/igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2004/page/n150","MAIN ST",null,null,"Real property owned by the city and county of San Francisco / 2004","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2004:66/3",2004,2004,"","property_record","annual report",null,"BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION (EASEMENT) · owned by city: PUC/Clean Water","unverified","igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2004",66,"https://archive.org/details/igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2004/page/n65","Main St",null,null,"Real property owned by the city and county of San Francisco / 2004","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2005:156/8",2005,2004,"2004-2005","property_record","annual report",null,"Bay Bridge Pump Station (Easement) · owned by city: City and County of San Francisco","unverified","igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2005",156,"https://archive.org/details/igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2005/page/n155","Main St",null,null,"Real property owned by the city and county of San Francisco / 2005","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2005sanf:246/4",2005,2005,null,"hearing",null,"referred","Hearing requested on safety and emergency procedures for the Bay Bridge and Golden Gate Bridge, sent to committee.","quoted","meetingminutesbo2005sanf",246,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2005sanf/page/n245",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2005sanf:291/2",2005,2005,null,"hearing","police","referred","Closed-session hearing on security breaches at the Port, Golden Gate Bridge and Bay Bridge sent to Police Department for comment.","quoted","meetingminutesbo2005sanf",291,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2005sanf/page/n290",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjanmar2005minutes100sanfrich:245/4",2005,2005,"2005-03-01","hearing",null,"referred","Hearing requested on safety and emergency procedures for the Bay Bridge and Golden Gate Bridge, sent to committee.","quoted","meetingjanmar2005minutes100sanfrich",245,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjanmar2005minutes100sanfrich/page/n245",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjanmar2005minutes100sanfrich:290/2",2005,2005,"2005-03-15","hearing","police","referred","Supervisor Alioto-Pier's closed-session hearing on security breaches at the Port, Golden Gate Bridge and Bay Bridge was referred to Police Department.","quoted","meetingjanmar2005minutes100sanfrich",290,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjanmar2005minutes100sanfrich/page/n290",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjanmar2005minutes100sanfrich|g589",2005,2005,"2005-03-15",null,"transport","pending","Request for Bay Bridge bike path money goes to next meeting.","unverified","meetingjanmar2005minutes100sanfrich",285,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjanmar2005minutes100sanfrich/page/n285",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjanmar2005minutes100sanfrich|g652",2005,2005,"2005-03-22",null,"transport","passed","City urges state to fund a Bay Bridge bike and walk path.","unverified","meetingjanmar2005minutes100sanfrich",320,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjanmar2005minutes100sanfrich/page/n320",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-0.97],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2006sanf:298/1",2006,2006,null,"resolution",null,"passed","Resolution urges the state to fund the Bay Bridge West Span bicycle and pedestrian pathway in any infrastructure bond.","quoted","meetingminutesbo2006sanf",298,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2006sanf/page/n297",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.62],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2006:60/4",2006,2006,"2006","property_record","city-owned property report",null,"Bay Bridge Pump Station (easement) · other: Easement for construction of Bay Bridge Pump Station","unverified","igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2006",60,"https://archive.org/details/igsl_san-francisco-real-prop-report_2006/page/n59",null,null,null,"Real property owned by the city and county of San Francisco / 2006","n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjanmar2006minutes101sanfrich:266/3",2006,2006,"2006-02-07","resolution",null,"referred","Resolution proposed urging the State Legislature to fund the Bay Bridge West Span bicycle and pedestrian pathway; referred for adoption.","quoted","meetingjanmar2006minutes101sanfrich",266,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjanmar2006minutes101sanfrich/page/n266",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2006sanf:269/3",2006,2006,"2006-02-07","resolution","transit","referred","Supervisor Daly's resolution urging state bond funding for the Bay Bridge bicycle pathway was referred for adoption.","quoted","meetingminutesbo2006sanf",269,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2006sanf/page/n268",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2006sanf|132",2006,2006,"2006-02-07","resolution","civic-life","referred","State funding urged for a Bay Bridge bicycle pathway","unverified","meetingminutesbo2006sanf",269,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2006sanf/page/n268",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesdr2006sanf:99/1",2006,2006,"2006-02-14","resolution",null,"passed","Adopted a resolution urging the state to fund the Bay Bridge west span bicycle and pedestrian pathway in any infrastructure bond.","quoted","meetingminutesdr2006sanf",99,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesdr2006sanf/page/n98",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjanmar2006minutes101sanfrich:295/1",2006,2006,"2006-11-13","resolution",null,"passed","Board urged the state legislature and governor to fund the Bay Bridge West Span bicycle and pedestrian pathway.","quoted","meetingjanmar2006minutes101sanfrich",295,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjanmar2006minutes101sanfrich/page/n295",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjanmar2006minutes101sanfrich|g478",2006,2006,"2006-11-13",null,"transport","passed","City asks state to fund Bay Bridge bike and walking path.","unverified","meetingjanmar2006minutes101sanfrich",295,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjanmar2006minutes101sanfrich/page/n295",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-0.97],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:359/8",2002,2007,"2007","event","environmental impact report",null,"SFOBB East Spans Seismic Safety Project · event: construction scheduled to be completed","unverified","C101747471",359,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n358",null,null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124910717:576/1",1998,2010,"2010","finding","environmental impact report",null,"I-80/Bay Bridge traffic growth to 2010 · other: Bay Bridge AM peak traffic increase to 2010, eastbound 23 percent","unverified","C124910717",576,"https://archive.org/details/C124910717/page/n575","I-80",null,null,"Revised draft environmental impact statement/environmental impact report for the disposal and reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914713:50/3",1993,2010,"2010","finding","study or report",null,"AC Transit transbay bus service · other: AC Transit would need to carry about 6,125 westbound transbay passengers in the am peak hour, 112% more than today","unverified","C124914713",50,"https://archive.org/details/C124914713/page/n49","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Transbay Transit Terminal current and future needs study : staff working paper : final","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922531:524/1",2000,2010,"2010","measure","environmental impact report",null,"Bay Bridge (I-80/Oakland Bay Bridge) traffic · other: A.M. peak hour traffic growth 2010, eastbound 23 percent, westbound 6 percent","unverified","C124922531",524,"https://archive.org/details/C124922531/page/n523","I-80",null,null,"Final environmental impact statement for the disposal and reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922948:59/4",1996,2010,"2010","finding","environmental impact report",null,"Bay Bridge traffic (Mission Bay Major New Site) · other: about 1,000 added daily trips to the Bay Bridge, no change in v/c ratio","unverified","C124922948",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124922948/page/n58","I-80 / Bay Bridge",null,null,"Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:14/5",2000,2010,"2010","project","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge seismic retrofit · other: seismic retrofit of west suspension spans, completed by 2010","unverified","C124925065",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n13","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2010sanf|151",2010,2010,"2010-03-16","resolution","getting-around","referred","State deal on Bay Bridge anchorage security sent to committee","quoted","meetingminutesbo2010sanf",259,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2010sanf/page/n258",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2010sanf_1|g11",2010,2010,"2010-06-08","resolution","safety","passed","State and city agree who maintains Bay Bridge anchorage security","quoted","meetingminutesb2010sanf_1",8,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2010sanf_1/page/n7",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-0.21],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2012sanf_0|g184",2012,2012,"2012-04-17","resolution","other","pending","Support proposed for Bay Bridge light art display, 2012 to 2014.","quoted","meetingminutesb2012sanf_0",66,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2012sanf_0/page/n65",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2012sanf_0|g212",2012,2012,"2012-04-24",null,"other","passed","City backs Bay Bridge light art display through 2014","unverified","meetingminutesb2012sanf_0",77,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2012sanf_0/page/n76",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.92],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2012sanf_0|g213",2012,2012,"2012-04-24","resolution","other","passed","City backs Bay Bridge light art display through 2014.","quoted","meetingminutesb2012sanf_0",77,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2012sanf_0/page/n76",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.42],["d","qipu:sf/decision/hand:ybi-bay-bridge-ramps-2013",2013,2013,"2013-08-01","contract",null,null,"New Bay Bridge ramps to Yerba Buena Island opened in 2016","unverified",null,null,"https://www.sfcta.org/press-releases/new-westbound-i-80-yerba-buena-island-and-ramps-open-traffic-saturday-oct-22","1 Yerba Buena Rd",null,"hand",null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/map:meetingminutesb2013sanf_2/31/22702cb1",2013,2013,"2013-09-10","resolution",null,null,"Bay Bridge western span to be named for Willie Brown","unverified","meetingminutesb2013sanf_2",32,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2013sanf_2/page/n31",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2013sanf_2|14",2013,2013,"2013-09-10","resolution","the-street",null,"Bay Bridge western span to be named for Willie Brown","quoted","meetingminutesb2013sanf_2",32,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2013sanf_2/page/n31",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2014sanf_1|g241",2014,2014,"2014-06-03",null,"admin","unknown","No decision; speaker opposed renaming Bay Bridge; others backed City College.","unverified","meetingminutesb2014sanf_1",97,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2014sanf_1/page/n96",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesdr2014sanf|g128",2014,2014,"2014-06-03",null,"admin","unknown","Speakers on City College; one opposed renaming Bay Bridge. No vote shown.","unverified","meetingminutesdr2014sanf",73,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesdr2014sanf/page/n72",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071916|165",2016,2016,"2016-07-19","ordinance","the-street",null,"City access to Bay Bridge fiber-optic cables sent to committee","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071916_minutes.pdf#page=41",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag080216|13",2016,2016,"2016-08-02","ordinance","the-street",null,"Two Bay Bridge fiber-optic agreements with Pacific Bell proposed","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag080216_minutes.pdf#page=4",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag080216|14",2016,2016,"2016-08-02","ordinance","running-the-city","passed","Bay Bridge fiber-optic access deals with Pacific Bell approved","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag080216_minutes.pdf#page=4",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.64],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922708:47/2",2000,2020,"2020","finding","plan",null,"San Francisco/Oakland Bay Bridge (I-80) · finding: average travel time increase of 24 percent","unverified","C124922708",47,"https://archive.org/details/C124922708/page/n46",null,null,null,"San Francisco countywide transportation plan : draft for public review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124910717:576/2",1998,2025,"2025","finding","environmental impact report",null,"I-80/Bay Bridge traffic growth to 2025 · other: Bay Bridge AM peak traffic increase to 2025, eastbound 45 percent","unverified","C124910717",576,"https://archive.org/details/C124910717/page/n575","I-80",null,null,"Revised draft environmental impact statement/environmental impact report for the disposal and reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922531:524/2",2000,2025,"2025","measure","environmental impact report",null,"Bay Bridge (I-80/Oakland Bay Bridge) traffic · other: A.M. peak hour traffic growth 2025, eastbound 45 percent, westbound 6 percent","unverified","C124922531",524,"https://archive.org/details/C124922531/page/n523","I-80",null,null,"Final environmental impact statement for the disposal and reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123309091:9/3",null,null,"","measure","plan",null,"Bay Bridge ramp metering · other: ramp metering signal control system used on the Bay Bridge","unverified","C123309091",9,"https://archive.org/details/C123309091/page/n7",null,null,null,"Regional transportation plan : summary and maps","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123309091:6/3",null,null,"next ten years","project","plan",null,"Highway 280 · proposes: connection of Highway 280 to the Bay Bridge in San Francisco","unverified","C123309091",6,"https://archive.org/details/C123309091/page/n4","Highway 280",null,null,"Regional transportation plan : summary and maps","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123309091:8/1",null,null,"next ten years","project","plan",null,"Highway 280 connection to the Bay Bridge · proposes: connection of Highway 280 to the Bay Bridge","unverified","C123309091",8,"https://archive.org/details/C123309091/page/n6",null,null,null,"Regional transportation plan : summary and maps","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123309091:9/1",null,null,"next ten years","project","plan",null,"Highway 280 connection to Bay Bridge · proposes: connection of Highway 280 to the Bay Bridge","unverified","C123309091",9,"https://archive.org/details/C123309091/page/n7",null,null,null,"Regional transportation plan : summary and maps","n","a",0,-1.0]]}