{"id":null,"ids":[],"kind":"named in documents","name":"Crocker Hills","tied_by":"name","block":null,"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:9/8",1976,1972,"1972","agency","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development · other: 1972 agreement provides treatment of up to 6.7 million gallons (4,700 gpm) of sewage a day at San Francisco plant during peak wet-weather flows","unverified","C124924654",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n8",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:14/1",1976,1976,"","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development traffic impact on San Francisco · finding: significant adverse impact on segments of Bayshore Boulevard and Mission Street","unverified","C124924654",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n13","Bayshore Boulevard; Mission Street",null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:14/2",1976,1976,"","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development traffic impact on Geneva Avenue · finding: slight adverse impact on Geneva Avenue","unverified","C124924654",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n13","Geneva Avenue",null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:14/3",1976,1976,"","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills auto traffic on Bayshore Freeway and Interstate 280 · finding: impacts described as minimal and marginally significant; ABAG review calls conclusion inappropriate and not adequately substantiated","unverified","C124924654",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n13","Bayshore Freeway (Route 101); Interstate 280",null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:14/4",1976,1976,"","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills downtown parking demand · other: about 1,500 parking stalls needed, or 2 percent of 64,820 off-street spaces in downtown area","unverified","C124924654",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n13",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:15/4",1976,1976,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills direct transit service to downtown San Francisco · recommendation: Institute direct no-transfer transit service from Crocker Hills to downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124924654",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n14",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:15/5",1976,1976,"","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills direct transit service to downtown San Francisco · finding: Need and viability of direct transit service not yet determined; may be addressed at specific plan stage","unverified","C124924654",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n14",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:5/2",1976,1976,"","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development · finding: Median rentals will likely be significantly higher than in either surrounding communities or the County as a whole","unverified","C124924654",5,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n4",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:5/4",1976,1976,"","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development · finding: Impact on San Francisco may be less severe than anticipated in the EIR and may occur over a longer period","unverified","C124924654",5,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n4",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:9/7",1976,1976,"","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development wastewater · other: Saddle, [name withheld] and Brisbane sites (almost 80 percent of acreage) would likely be conveyed by [name withheld] district to San Francisco Southeast Plant","unverified","C124924654",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n8",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:5/1",1976,1976,"15-year period","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development · households displaced: San Francisco could lose 9,600 - 12,000 people to Crocker Hills over a 15-year period","unverified","C124924654",5,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n4",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:13/1",1976,1976,"1976","finding","study or report",null,"MUNI (Crocker Hills riders) · other: 126 peak-hour trips to other parts of the City assigned to MUNI","unverified","C124924654",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n12",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","m",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:19/1",1976,1976,"1976","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development DEIR · finding: substantial alteration of existing views of the mountain from San Francisco","unverified","C124924654",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n18",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:22/1",1976,1976,"1976","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development · finding: Potential utilization without compensation of a significant portion of the capacity of regional freeway links, local streets and public transit","unverified","C124924654",22,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n21",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:22/2",1976,1976,"1976","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development · finding: Potential preclusion of future opportunities for San Francisco's growth because of legal obligations to provide wastewater treatment to other jurisdictions","unverified","C124924654",22,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n21",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:22/3",1976,1976,"1976","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development · finding: Crocker Hills employees who are not San Francisco residents might be more likely to commute than move to San Francisco, given the city's tight housing market","unverified","C124924654",22,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n21",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:7/1",1976,1976,"1976","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development · population: anticipated population loss of 9,600 - 12,000 from San Francisco to Crocker Hills","unverified","C124924654",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n6",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:7/2",1976,1976,"1976","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development · finding: impossible to conclude whether population loss would be compensated by new residents in San Francisco","unverified","C124924654",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n6",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:20/1",1976,1976,"1976-01-15","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development · finding: DEIR evaluation does not reflect San Francisco urban design guidelines; possible serious conflict with San Francisco's visual environment policies","unverified","C124924654",20,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n19",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:21/1",1976,1976,"1976-01-15","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development · finding: potential emigration of middle- and upper-income residents from San Francisco to Crocker Hills","unverified","C124924654",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n20",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:21/2",1976,1976,"1976-01-15","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development · finding: potential relocation of commercial and industrial tenants from San Francisco","unverified","C124924654",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n20",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:21/3",1976,1976,"1976-01-15","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development · finding: possible increase in ratio of low- and moderate-income to middle- and upper-income residents in San Francisco","unverified","C124924654",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n20",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:21/4",1976,1976,"1976-01-15","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development · finding: unlikely to result in a significant net increase in lower-income San Francisco residents","unverified","C124924654",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n20",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:6/1",1976,1976,"1976-01-15","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development · other: lower-income employees anticipated to seek housing in San Francisco and other locations outside the project area","unverified","C124924654",6,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n5",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:8/3",1976,1976,"1976-01-15","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills project wage earners · other: 52 percent of project wage earners projected to reside in San Francisco","unverified","C124924654",8,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n7",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:8/4",1976,1976,"1976-01-15","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills project consumer expenditures · other: Consumer expenditures exported from Crocker Hills to San Francisco","unverified","C124924654",8,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n7",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:8/5",1976,1976,"1976-01-15","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills project fiscal effects · finding: No measures have been proposed to mitigate the project's potential fiscal effects on San Francisco","unverified","C124924654",8,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n7",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:1/1",1976,1976,"January 15, 1976","event","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development review · event: ABAG Executive Board approved the report for transmittal","unverified","C124924654",1,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n0",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:1/2",1976,1976,"October 16, 1975","event","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills development review · event: Resolution from San Francisco Board of Supervisors requesting review of effects on San Francisco","unverified","C124924654",1,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n0",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,0.0]]}