{"id":null,"ids":[],"kind":"named in documents","name":"Downtown San Francisco","tied_by":"name","block":null,"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:32/10001",1983,198,"198","finding","plan",null,"Downtown San Francisco retail space · other: Macy's 545,000 sq ft, Emporium 481,000 sq ft","unverified","c124897620",32,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n31",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123319604:35/4",1975,1887,"1887","site","environmental impact report",null,"Land filled behind seawall, downtown San Francisco · other: 800 acres of land filled behind the wall","unverified","C123319604",35,"https://archive.org/details/C123319604/page/n34",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact report on special area plan for the San Francisco waterfront","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:182/1",1987,1906,"1906","building","study or report",null,"Mills Building · event: one of the few downtown buildings to survive the earthquake and fire of 1906","unverified","C124889732",182,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n181",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:89/1",1983,1906,"1906-1930","building","plan",null,"Downtown San Francisco buildings · built: product of a short period lasting from 1906 until about 1930","unverified","c124897620",89,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n88",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed02sanfrich:704/4",1907,1907,"1907-10-28","resolution",null,null,"Permits proposed for private firms to install steam engines and boilers at several downtown San Francisco buildings.","quoted","journalofproceed02sanfrich",704,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed02sanfrich/page/n703",null,"Engine and Boiler Permits. On motion of Supervisor Tveitmoe: Resolution No. (New Series), granting J. D. Grant permission",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed02sanfrich:704/5",1907,1907,"1907-10-28","resolution",null,"passed","Permits proposed for private owners to store crude petroleum fuel tanks at several downtown San Francisco buildings.","quoted","journalofproceed02sanfrich",704,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed02sanfrich/page/n703",null,"Oil Permits. Also, Resolution No. (New Series), Granting J. D. Grant permission to erect and maintain a storage tank",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1909sanfrich:1143/3",1909,1909,"1909-11-15","ordinance",null,"passed","Sidewalk width rules were abolished on Tillman Alley and Ross Alley, downtown San Francisco, by ordinance.","quoted","journalofproceed1909sanfrich",1143,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1909sanfrich/page/n1143",null,"Bill No. 1075, Ordinance No. 947 (New Series), entitled, Amending Ordinance No. 1061, entitled Regulating the Widths of Sidewalks",null,null,"n","a",0,-0.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1913sanfrich:649/1",1913,1913,null,"ordinance","transit",null,"Supervisor George Gallagher proposed a fifty-year franchise letting Southern Pacific lay railroad tracks across downtown San Francisco streets.","quoted","journalofproceed1913sanfrich",649,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1913sanfrich/page/n649",null,"Southern Pacific Franchise. Supervisor George E. Gallagher presented: Bill No.",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1914sanfrich:247/1",1914,1914,null,"ordinance","transit","passed first reading","Southern Pacific Company's forty-year railroad track franchise across downtown San Francisco streets was passed for printing as amended.","quoted","journalofproceed1914sanfrich",247,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1914sanfrich/page/n247",null,"Providing for a grant and granting to Southern Pacific Company, a railroad corporation, its successors and assigns",null,null,"n","a",0,1.15],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1914sanfrich:270/3",1914,1914,"1914-03-09","ordinance","transit",null,"Proposed ordinance would grant Southern Pacific Company forty-year rights to build railroad tracks across downtown San Francisco streets.","quoted","journalofproceed1914sanfrich",270,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1914sanfrich/page/n270",null,"Providing for a grant and granting to Southern Pacific Company, a railroad corporation, its successors and assigns",null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1915sanfrich:370/2",1915,1915,"1915-03-08","resolution",null,"passed","Revocable permits granted for public garages, a boiler and oil storage tanks at several downtown San Francisco addresses.","quoted","journalofproceed1915sanfrich",370,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1915sanfrich/page/n361",null,"Garage, Boiler and Oil Permits. Resolution No. 11576 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-0.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1917sanfrich:1141/3",1917,1917,"1917-07-23","resolution",null,"passed","Thirty-nine thousand dollars was adopted to reconstruct Davis, First, Second and McAllister streets in downtown San Francisco.","quoted","journalofproceed1917sanfrich",1141,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1917sanfrich/page/n1141",null,"Also, Resolution No. 14602 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the sura of thirty-nine thousand dollars",null,null,"n","a",0,3.18],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1917sanfrich:1817/4",1917,1917,"1917-12-26","resolution",null,"passed","The Board granted revocable permits for oil tanks, boilers and a laundry at several downtown San Francisco addresses.","quoted","journalofproceed1917sanfrich",1817,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1917sanfrich/page/n1817",null,"Permits. Resolution No. 15182 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the following revocable permits are hereby granted",null,null,"n","a",0,-0.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1922sanfrich:984/1",1922,1922,"1922-10-23","resolution",null,"passed","Revocable permits granted for a public garage, gasoline storage and oil tanks at several downtown San Francisco addresses.","quoted","journalofproceed1922sanfrich",984,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1922sanfrich/page/n983",null,"Permits. Resolution No. 20380 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-0.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:124/4",1927,1927,"1927-01-17","other",null,null,"The Traffic Committee recommends installing traffic signals at many downtown San Francisco intersections, in order of importance.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",124,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n124",null,"Report of Traffic Committee. To the Honorable Board of Supervisors. Gentlemen:",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:2082/4",1927,1927,"1927-10-17","resolution","transit","continued","City Planning and Building Company's submarine tunnel franchise application, from downtown San Francisco to Oakland, was continued to October 24, 1927.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2082,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2082",null,"Application of City Planning and Building Company for a franchise and for authority to erect",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich:2108/6",1927,1927,"1927-10-24","resolution",null,"passed","Revocable permits granted for oil tanks and boilers at several Mission and downtown San Francisco addresses.","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2108,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2108",null,"Oil and Boiler Permits. Resolution No. 27961 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the following revocable permits be and the same are hereby granted",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:553/3",1928,1928,"1928-03-26","resolution",null,"referred","Loading zones at many downtown San Francisco addresses were proposed and sent back to the Finance Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",553,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n553",null,"Loading Zone Permits. Resolution No. (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the following loading zones",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:611/2",1928,1928,"1928-04-02","resolution",null,"passed","Loading zones at five downtown San Francisco addresses rescinded and reestablished with new lengths by resolution.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",611,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n611",null,"Rescinding and Reestablishing Loading Zones. Also, Resolution No. 28788 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,2.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:1313/1",1928,1928,"1928-06-18","resolution",null,null,"Traffic Committee resolution proposes new loading zones in front of dozens of downtown San Francisco addresses.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",1313,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n1313",null,"Loading Zone Permits. On recommendation of the Traffic Committee: Resolution No. 29183 (New Series)",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:1553/1",1928,1928,"1928-07-16","resolution",null,"passed","Board adopted a resolution establishing loading zones in front of many downtown San Francisco addresses.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",1553,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n1553",null,"Establishing Loading Zones. On recommendation of the Traffic Committee: Resolution No. 29325 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,2.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich:2866/1",1928,1928,"1928-12-31","resolution",null,"passed","Passenger loading zones adopted at several downtown San Francisco addresses on Geary, Grant, Post and Sutter streets.","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",2866,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n2866",null,"Passenger Loading Zones. Also, Resolution No. 30193 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the following list",null,null,"n","a",0,2.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:39/1",1929,1929,"1929-01-07","resolution",null,"passed","Board adopted a resolution setting loading zones at many downtown San Francisco addresses, though part was sent back to the Traffic Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",39,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n39",null,"Loading Zones. On recommendation of Traffic and Safety Committee. Resolution No. 30217 (New Series)",null,null,"n","a",0,2.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:39/2",1929,1929,"1929-01-07","resolution",null,"referred","Proposed passenger loading zones at downtown San Francisco addresses were ordered rereferred to the Traffic Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",39,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n39",null,"Passenger Loading Zones. Resolution No. (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the following list of passenger loading zones",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:456/2",1929,1929,"1929-03-04","resolution",null,"passed","Taxicab stand permits were approved for six cab companies at several downtown San Francisco addresses.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",456,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n456",null,"Granting Taxicab Stand Permits. On recommendation of Police and Licenses Committee.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:2136/1",1929,1929,"1929-10-21","resolution",null,"passed","Loading zones established at eleven downtown San Francisco addresses for nearby businesses, including Market and Post streets.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",2136,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n2136",null,"Establishing Loading Zones. On recommendation of Traffic and Safety Committee. Resolution No. 31568",null,null,"n","a",0,2.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed25part2sanfrich:895/3",1930,1930,"1930-07-21","resolution",null,"passed","Loading zones were set up at several downtown San Francisco businesses on Turk, Sansome, Bush, California and Broadway.","quoted","journalofproceed25part2sanfrich",895,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed25part2sanfrich/page/n892",null,"Loading Zones Established. On recommendation of Traffic Committee.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed25part2sanfrich:926/1",1930,1930,"1930-07-28","ordinance",null,null,"Proposed traffic rules limit how long vehicles may stand for loading in specified downtown San Francisco places.","quoted","journalofproceed25part2sanfrich",926,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed25part2sanfrich/page/n923",null,"Section 36 (a.) During the times specified herein it shall be unlawful for an operator",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899725:15/1",1954,1930,"1930-1950","site","plan",null,"Union Square Garage and Bridge Terminal Garage · other: 2,327 stalls","unverified","C124899725",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124899725/page/n14",null,null,null,"The Parking Authority's San Francisco Parking Program for the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899725:15/2",1954,1930,"1930-1950","finding","plan",null,"new public garages, downtown San Francisco · other: 10 garages, capacity 3,366 spaces","unverified","C124899725",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124899725/page/n14",null,null,null,"The Parking Authority's San Francisco Parking Program for the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26sanfrich:660/3",1931,1931,"1931-03-16","resolution","transit","passed","Board transferred dozens of one-cab stands from Blue Bird Cab Company to Blue Top Cabs, Ltd., across downtown San Francisco.","quoted","journalofproceed26sanfrich",660,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26sanfrich/page/n639",null,"Transfer of One-Cab Stands. Also, Resolution No. 34105 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,2.4],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26sanfrich:854/1",1931,1931,"1931-04-13","resolution",null,"passed","Board adopted resolution establishing and abolishing loading zones at several downtown San Francisco addresses, including Victoria Hotel and Grand Hotel.","quoted","journalofproceed26sanfrich",854,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26sanfrich/page/n831",null,"Establishing and Abolishing Loading Zones and Passenger Loading",null,null,"n","a",0,2.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26sanfrich:1385/1",1931,1931,"1931-06-08","resolution",null,"passed","Loading zones set up and abolished at a dozen downtown San Francisco addresses, including Geary, Market and Kearny streets.","quoted","journalofproceed26sanfrich",1385,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26sanfrich/page/n1358",null,"Establishing or Abolishing Loading Zones and Passenger-Loading Zones.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich:760/1",1931,1931,"1931-10-13","ordinance",null,"passed","Parking is now prohibited 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. on many downtown San Francisco streets, except for licensed passenger vehicles.","quoted","journalofproceed26part2sanfrich",760,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich/page/n737",null,"Amending Section 37 of Ordinance No. 7691 (New Series), \"Traffic Ordinance.\"",null,null,"n","a",0,2.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:469/2",1937,1937,"1937-03-15","resolution","transit","passed","Board considered endorsing Santa Fe Railway's plan to replace its Oakland ferry link with motor buses and a downtown San Francisco terminal.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",469,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n462",null,"Board of Supervisors Endorses Bus Application of Santa Fe for Certificate of Convenience and Necessity.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:1360/2",1937,1937,"1937-07-12","ordinance",null,"passed","Proposed ordinance would bar parking at certain hours in downtown San Francisco areas; vote continues on the next page.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",1360,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n1351",null,"Prohibiting Parking at Certain Hours in Downtown Areas. (Code No. 11.02)",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed33sanfrich:1205/1",1938,1938,"1938-07-11","ordinance",null,"passed","Ordinance setting one-way traffic directions on downtown San Francisco streets finally passed, eight ayes to none.","quoted","journalofproceed33sanfrich",1205,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed33sanfrich/page/n1205",null,"Suitable signs shall be erected and maintained at all intersections of said parts of streets",null,null,"n","a",0,2.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:21/1",1995,1939,"1939","building","study or report",null,"Transbay Transit Terminal · built year: opened in 1939","unverified","C124914193",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n21",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed35sanfrich:2095/1",1940,1940,"1940-08-21","ordinance",null,null,"Sidewalk flower-vending stand locations in downtown San Francisco are being amended, with the ordinance continuing onto the next page.","quoted","journalofproceed35sanfrich",2095,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed35sanfrich/page/n2095",null,"Section 3. Sections 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, and 160 are hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 155. Designation of Locations",null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed35sanfrich:2688/2",1940,1940,"1940-10-28","resolution",null,"passed","Board adopted Resolution 1403 making about fourteen downtown San Francisco streets one-way at all times.","quoted","journalofproceed35sanfrich",2688,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed35sanfrich/page/n2688",null,"Traffic Regulations — \"One Way Streets — All Times\" (Series of 1939) Resolution No. 1403, as follows",null,null,"n","m",0,2.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed38part2sanfrich:75/2",1943,1943,"1943-05-17","resolution",null,null,"Resolution 3385 proposes banning parking on many downtown San Francisco streets from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m.","quoted","journalofproceed38part2sanfrich",75,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed38part2sanfrich/page/n75",null,"Resolution No. 3385, as follows: Resolved, That, pursuant to Article 3, Section 32 of Bill 863",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:155/5",1983,1945,"1945","finding","study or report",null,"Not rated buildings · finding: Buildings built or insensitively remodeled since 1945 are not rated","unverified","c124896626",155,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n154",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:44/3",1977,1945,"1945-1959","finding","study or report",null,"Major office buildings built 1945-1959 · stories: average 14 stories, 13 buildings","unverified","C124906302",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n43",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:44/4",1977,1945,"1945-1959","finding","study or report",null,"Major office buildings built 1945-1959 · floor area sqft: average 225,000 gross square feet per building","unverified","C124906302",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n43",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:21/3",1979,1945,"1945-1960","building","study or report",null,"Downtown office buildings built 1945-1960 · stories: averaged 13 stories","unverified","C124924423",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n20",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:21/4",1979,1945,"1945-1960","building","study or report",null,"Downtown office buildings built 1945-1960 · floor area sqft: averaged 195,000 gross square feet","unverified","C124924423",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n20",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:25/1",1979,1945,"1945-1960","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown office space in buildings over 10 stories · other: 3,767,000 gross sq ft constructed 1945-1960 (annual average 251,153)","unverified","C124924423",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n24",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed412sanfrich:2240/2",1946,1946,"1946-06-10","resolution",null,null,"A proposal to ban left turns at many downtown San Francisco intersections and streets was introduced, with its vote continuing on the next page.","quoted","journalofproceed412sanfrich",2240,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed412sanfrich/page/n2240",null,"Proposal No. 5752, Resolution No (Series of 1939), as follows: Resolved, That pursuant to Article 3, Section 34 of Bill 863",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed411sanfrich:401/1",1946,1946,"1946-08-12","resolution",null,"passed","Police Committee proposes banning left turns at many downtown San Francisco streets and intersections; consideration continued.","quoted","journalofproceed411sanfrich",401,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed411sanfrich/page/n400",null,"Amending Resolution No. 3450 (Series of 1939), Entitled: \"Traffic Regulations — Left-Hand Turns Prohibited",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:231/1",1947,1947,"1947","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown streets · finding: very congested at present; more traffic would be unwise","unverified","C124921430",231,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n230",null,"The downtown streets of San Francisco are very congested at present and to introduce more traffic into this area would be unwise.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:49/1",1977,1948,"1948","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco off-street parking · other: 20,000 off-street parking spaces","unverified","C124906302",49,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n48",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:374/1",1953,1953,"1953-04-27","motion",null,"referred","Supervisor Mancuso asked a committee to study banning trucks in downtown San Francisco during business hours; referred to Police Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",374,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n374",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:761/2",1953,1953,"1953-08-24","hearing","transit","tabled","A public hearing was opened on a proposed five-cent special shopper's fare on Muni in downtown San Francisco.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",761,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n761",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:764/1",1953,1953,"1953-08-24","resolution","transit","tabled","A five-cent special shopper's fare in downtown San Francisco was tabled by the Board after a divided vote.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",764,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n764",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:765/1",1953,1953,"1953-08-24","resolution","transit","passed","Five-cent Shopper's Special fare for Municipal Railway trips in downtown San Francisco approved.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",765,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n765",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,5.78],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:995/5",1953,1953,"1953-11-09","resolution","transit","passed","Supervisors adopted a resolution extending the five-cent Municipal Railway shopper's fare in downtown San Francisco to December 1953.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",995,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n995",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.4],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899725:21/4",1954,1954,"","finding","plan",null,"San Francisco parking program · other: approximately 96% of spaces located in downtown","unverified","C124899725",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124899725/page/n20",null,null,null,"The Parking Authority's San Francisco Parking Program for the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899725:15/3",1954,1954,"20 years preceding the Parking Authority","finding","plan",null,"new car spaces by private industry, downtown San Francisco · other: 1,039 new car spaces","unverified","C124899725",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124899725/page/n14",null,null,null,"The Parking Authority's San Francisco Parking Program for the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:57/6",1978,1955,"1955","project","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan · other: 1955 Downtown Plan guided downtown development; no effective limit on building height or bulk","unverified","C124899682",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n56",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed50sanfrich:121/1",1955,1955,"1955-02-14","resolution",null,"passed","Post and O'Farrell Streets made one-way on an experimental 120-day trial basis in downtown San Francisco.","quoted","journalofproceed50sanfrich",121,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed50sanfrich/page/n120",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878417:33/3",1956,1956,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Minimum plan · other: would require elevated structures in downtown San Francisco instead of underground","unverified","C124878417",33,"https://archive.org/details/C124878417/page/n32",null,null,null,"Organizational and financial aspects of the proposed San Francisco Bay Area rapid transit system","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed52sanfrich:142/2",1957,1957,"1957-03-04","resolution","transit","passed","Board adopted a finding on extending indefinitely the five-cent Shoppers' Shuttle fare in downtown San Francisco from April 1, 1957.","quoted","journalofproceed52sanfrich",142,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed52sanfrich/page/n141",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.65],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed52sanfrich:142/3",1957,1957,"1957-03-04","resolution","transit","passed","Board approved indefinite continuation of the five-cent Shoppers' Shuttle fare in downtown San Francisco from April 1, 1957.","quoted","journalofproceed52sanfrich",142,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed52sanfrich/page/n141",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.65],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:67/2",1978,1958,"1958 to 1972","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco retail sales · other: declined 11 percent (in real dollars)","unverified","C124899682",67,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n66",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:21/3",1995,1959,"1959","building","study or report",null,"Transbay Transit Terminal · other: revamped to serve as a bus terminal","unverified","C124914193",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n21",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:55/4",1978,1960,"1960","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco urban core case study area · other: Resident population 1960","unverified","C124899682",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n54",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906117:91/2",1978,1960,"1960","finding","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco property · finding: high sales activity, conversions from residential to commercial use and increased use intensity since 1960","unverified","C124906117",91,"https://archive.org/details/C124906117/page/n90",null,null,null,"Study of property acquisition and occupancy : BART's effect on speculation, working paper","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:239/3",1983,1960,"1960's or 1970's","building","study or report",null,"Bank of America building · other: 1960s or 1970s building with much higher rents than older buildings","unverified","c124896626",239,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n238",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:13/1",1977,1960,"1960-1975","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco office development · built: 39 new office buildings, 1960-1975","unverified","C124906302",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n12",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:13/2",1977,1960,"1960-1975","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco office development · floor area sqft: approximately 20 million gross square feet of added office space, 1960-1975","unverified","C124906302",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n12",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:13/3",1977,1960,"1960-1975","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco office development · jobs: workers increased from 115,000 in 1960 to 192,000 in 1975","unverified","C124906302",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n12",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:13/4",1977,1960,"1960-1975","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco office development · finding: new buildings concentrated in an area of approximately one square mile near the Embarcadero and Montgomery BART stations","unverified","C124906302",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n12",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:13/5",1977,1960,"1960-1975","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco new office buildings · height ft: averaging 26 stories, bulkier averaging 500,000 gross square feet","unverified","C124906302",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n12",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:43/3",1977,1960,"1960-1975","event","study or report",null,"Major office buildings constructed downtown · built: 39 major office buildings adding 20.8 million gross square feet","unverified","C124906302",43,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n42",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:43/4",1977,1960,"1960-1975","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown office growth rate · floor area sqft: average growth of 1.3 million gross square feet per year","unverified","C124906302",43,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n42",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:44/5",1977,1960,"1960-1975","finding","study or report",null,"Post-1960 major office buildings · stories: range 10 to 52 stories, average 26 stories","unverified","C124906302",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n43",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:44/6",1977,1960,"1960-1975","finding","study or report",null,"Post-1960 major office buildings · floor area sqft: average 534,000 gross square feet per building","unverified","C124906302",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n43",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:58/2",1977,1960,"1960-1975","event","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco commercial office development · other: Commercial office space development occurred in downtown San Francisco, assessed for impacts","unverified","C124906302",58,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n57",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:59/1",1977,1960,"1960-1975","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco office buildings · built: 39 major office buildings constructed, majority around foot of Market Street","unverified","C124906302",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n58","Market Street",null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:68/1",1977,1960,"1960-1975","project","study or report",null,"Major downtown development (39 buildings) · other: 39 buildings","unverified","C124906302",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n67",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:68/2",1977,1960,"1960-1975","project","study or report",null,"Major downtown development (39 buildings) · jobs: 77,000 employees","unverified","C124906302",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n67",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:68/3",1977,1960,"1960-1975","project","study or report",null,"Major downtown development (39 buildings) · floor area sqft: 20.8 million square feet","unverified","C124906302",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n67",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:68/4",1977,1960,"1960-1975","finding","study or report",null,"New downtown development water demand · other: 2 million gallons/day, 1-2% of total; 20-30 gallons/day/employee","unverified","C124906302",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n67",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:68/5",1977,1960,"1960-1975","finding","study or report",null,"New downtown development gas demand · other: 100-200 million BTU/hour, less than 1% of total; 5-10 BTUs/hour/square foot","unverified","C124906302",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n67",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:68/6",1977,1960,"1960-1975","finding","study or report",null,"New downtown development electricity demand · other: 30-50 million KWH/month, 10-18% of total; 1-1/2 to 2-1/2 KWH/month/square foot","unverified","C124906302",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n67",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:12/1",1977,1960,"1960-1980","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · other: Major office buildings constructed in downtown San Francisco 1960-1975 and proposed for completion by 1980","unverified","C124906302",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n11",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:45/1",1977,1960,"1960-1980","site","study or report",null,"Major downtown office buildings · other: Major downtown office buildings constructed 1960-1975 and proposed for completion by 1980 (Figure 5)","unverified","C124906302",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n44",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:320/1",1983,1961,"1961","measure","study or report",null,"C-3 District business activities · other: Employment densities for all business activities in the C-3 District, shown in Table H.2","unverified","c124896626",320,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n319",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:21/5",1979,1961,"1961-1970","building","study or report",null,"Highrise office buildings built 1961-1970 · stories: twenty-three buildings averaging 25 stories","unverified","C124924423",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n20",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:21/6",1979,1961,"1961-1970","building","study or report",null,"Highrise office buildings built 1961-1970 · floor area sqft: averaging 513,000 gross square feet","unverified","C124924423",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n20",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:25/2",1979,1961,"1961-1970","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown office space in buildings over 10 stories · other: 11,303,000 gross sq ft constructed 1961-1970 (annual average 1,130,300)","unverified","C124924423",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n24",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101695212:149/5",1962,1962,"","project","plan",null,"Downtown Plan architectural design study · cost usd: one-half of $25,000 credited as local non-cash contribution","unverified","C101695212",149,"https://archive.org/details/C101695212/page/n148",null,null,null,"A community renewal program for the city and county of San Francisco : application to the Housing and Home Finance Agency for a federal grant to assist in the preparation of a community renewal program","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101695212:155/1",1962,1962,"","project","plan",null,"Downtown Plan · other: Renewal plan to be coordinated with and incorporated into the Downtown Plan developed by architectural consultants","unverified","C101695212",155,"https://archive.org/details/C101695212/page/n154",null,null,null,"A community renewal program for the city and county of San Francisco : application to the Housing and Home Finance Agency for a federal grant to assist in the preparation of a community renewal program","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101695212:81/3",1962,1962,"","measure","plan",null,"Downtown Plan · cost usd: 112,500","unverified","C101695212",81,"https://archive.org/details/C101695212/page/n80",null,null,null,"A community renewal program for the city and county of San Francisco : application to the Housing and Home Finance Agency for a federal grant to assist in the preparation of a community renewal program","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101695212:97/2",1962,1962,"","project","plan",null,"Downtown Plan · other: Senior City Planner directs architectural consultants and departmental staff on the Downtown Plan project","unverified","C101695212",97,"https://archive.org/details/C101695212/page/n96",null,null,null,"A community renewal program for the city and county of San Francisco : application to the Housing and Home Finance Agency for a federal grant to assist in the preparation of a community renewal program","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed57sanfrich:421/2",1962,1962,"1962-07-09","ordinance","transit","continued","Proposed ordinance banning passenger loading of certain buses in a designated downtown San Francisco area was continued for two weeks.","quoted","journalofproceed57sanfrich",421,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed57sanfrich/page/n414",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877556:15/1",1963,1963,"","measure","minutes or proceedings",null,"downtown San Francisco streets · other: developing streets to 66 foot standard width","unverified","C124877556",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124877556/page/n14",null,null,null,"Transcript of hearing on the subject of central city problems, San Francisco, California, October 22, 1963","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:57/7",1978,1963,"1963","project","study or report",null,"1963 Downtown Plan · other: addressed BART coordination questions but was not a specific station area plan","unverified","C124899682",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n56",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:21/2",1979,1963,"1963","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco (1963 report) · proposes: general plan focused on transportation and circulation, preservation of historic buildings, and Downtown functional areas","unverified","C124924016",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n20",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed58sanfrich:383/1",1963,1963,"1963-07-01","resolution",null,"passed","Monroe Street and a Kearny Street traffic lane were made one-way southbound in downtown San Francisco at all times.","quoted","journalofproceed58sanfrich",383,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed58sanfrich/page/n382",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed58sanfrich:567/5",1963,1963,"1963-09-10","resolution","transit","passed","The Public Utilities Commission is asked to conduct a preliminary study of a monorail from downtown San Francisco to the airport.","quoted","journalofproceed58sanfrich",554,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed58sanfrich/page/n554",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877556:11/1",1963,1963,"1963-10-22","finding","minutes or proceedings",null,"downtown San Francisco transportation · other: very little need for rapid transit at this time","unverified","C124877556",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124877556/page/n10",null,null,null,"Transcript of hearing on the subject of central city problems, San Francisco, California, October 22, 1963","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101694731:81/3",1963,1963,"February 1954","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · other: Report to Parking Authority on Downtown Parking","unverified","C101694731",81,"https://archive.org/details/C101694731/page/n80",null,null,null,"San Francisco community renewal program : phase 1, Research design : technical reports to the Dept. of City Planning of the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:58/4",1978,1964,"1964","action","study or report",null,"Downtown zoning floor area ratios · other: reduced allowable FAR from 20:1 to 16:1 at mid-block and from 25:1 to 20:1 for corner lots","unverified","C124899682",58,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n57",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:436/1",1970,1965,"1965","event","study or report",null,"Downtown Parking and Traffic Survey (DPATS) · lead agency: Department of Public Works","unverified","C124878301",436,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n435",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124884963:211/1",1975,1965,"1965","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco employment · other: Manufacturing employment 10,949 (1965 column)","unverified","C124884963",211,"https://archive.org/details/C124884963/page/n210",null,null,null,"Commercial and industrial activity in San Francisco : present characteristics and future trends : report to San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124884963:211/2",1975,1965,"1965","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco employment · other: Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate employment 39,434 (1965 column)","unverified","C124884963",211,"https://archive.org/details/C124884963/page/n210",null,null,null,"Commercial and industrial activity in San Francisco : present characteristics and future trends : report to San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885329:11/4",1965,1965,"1965","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown street closings · finding: Street closings recommended would seriously disrupt present downtown circulation system","unverified","C124885329",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124885329/page/n10",null,null,null,"Market Street development : an analysis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:21/1",1978,1965,"1965","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco Civic Center-Powell-Montgomery-Embarcadero Station Areas · other: 1965 Pre-BART Land Use and Zoning map","unverified","C124899682",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n20",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:55/1",1978,1965,"1965","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco urban core case study area · other: Employment 1965 (data may not be accurate, per footnote)","unverified","C124899682",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n54",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:60/1",1978,1965,"1965","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco pre-BART station areas · other: 1965 pre-BART land use and zoning map of station areas (Civic Center, Powell, Montgomery, Embarcadero)","unverified","C124899682",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n59",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:60/2",1978,1965,"1965","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco height limits · other: 1965 downtown San Francisco height limits, Market Street section","unverified","C124899682",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n59","Market Street",null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:257/1",1973,1965,"1965","finding","study or report",null,"Table C-5 downtown San Francisco trip time distribution · other: Peak Hour 30.5%, Non-Peak Hour 69.7% (downtown San Francisco trips)","unverified","c123305332",257,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n254",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:259/1",1973,1965,"1965","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco automobile trips · other: 57% of total automobile trips to downtown generated in San Francisco","unverified","c123305332",259,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n256",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124892967:61/2",1976,1965,"1965","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco off-street parking · other: 49,610 off-street spaces","unverified","c124892967",61,"https://archive.org/details/c124892967/page/n60",null,null,null,"Transportation conditions and trends : background information for the transportation strategy and programs report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:29/4",1985,1965,"1965-1966","finding","study or report",null,"Port of Oakland ACV demonstration route Oakland to downtown San Francisco · finding: fewer passengers than anticipated; a terminal closer to the central business district would have increased patronage","unverified","C123305299",29,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n28",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124884963:155/10003",1975,1965,"1965-1970","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · finding: increased its share of total city employment","unverified","C124884963",155,"https://archive.org/details/C124884963/page/n154",null,null,null,"Commercial and industrial activity in San Francisco : present characteristics and future trends : report to San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:69/5",1977,1965,"1965-1975","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco office development · finding: new office development in downtown San Francisco accounted for a large share of increased electric energy consumption","unverified","C124906302",69,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n68",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:212/7",1970,1965,"1965-66","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Parking and Traffic Survey (DPATS) · other: 40% of parkers remained less than 40 minutes","unverified","C124878408",212,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n211",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-3.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:21/4",1978,1965,"1965-77","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco Civic Center-Powell-Montgomery-Embarcadero Station Areas · other: 1965-77 Land Use Changes and Zoning map","unverified","C124899682",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n20",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:85/1",1978,1965,"1965-77","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco BART station area · other: Multi-family residential, 460 units new construction 1965-77","unverified","C124899682",85,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n84",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:85/2",1978,1965,"1965-77","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco BART station area · other: Hotel accommodations, 3,390 rooms new construction 1965-77","unverified","C124899682",85,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n84",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:85/3",1978,1965,"1965-77","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco BART station area · other: Office space 23.6 million square feet new construction 1965-77","unverified","C124899682",85,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n84",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:85/4",1978,1965,"1965-77","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco BART station area · other: Parking land 11.6 acres new construction 1965-77","unverified","C124899682",85,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n84",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:436/2",1970,1966,"1966","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Parking and Traffic Survey (DPATS) · finding: additional 12,300 spaces of off-street parking would be needed by 1975","unverified","C124878301",436,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n435",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885301:95/2",1966,1966,"1966","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown circulation plan · recommendation: Revise the downtown circulation plan to make more efficient use of existing streets and relieve Market Street as a traffic carrier","unverified","C124885301",95,"https://archive.org/details/C124885301/page/n94",null,null,null,"Street and sidewalk-widths and uses","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:25/1",1979,1966,"1966","project","study or report",null,"San Francisco Downtown Zoning Study · other: completed 1966; projected next 15 years of Downtown growth","unverified","C124924016",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n24",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885301:49/1",1966,1966,"since 1959","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown pedestrian volumes · finding: cordon count increases averaging 1.5% a year since 1959","unverified","C124885301",49,"https://archive.org/details/C124885301/page/n48",null,null,null,"Street and sidewalk-widths and uses","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:91/4",1983,1967,"1967","finding","plan",null,"Downtown landmark designation · other: Average of 2.3 downtown buildings a year designated since 1967","unverified","c124897620",91,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n90",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:64/1",1977,1967,"1967-1975","finding","study or report",null,"Carbon monoxide levels, San Francisco · finding: CO levels have steadily diminished 1967-1975 despite downtown development and increasing vehicular activity","unverified","C124906302",64,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n63",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:58/5",1978,1968,"1968","action","study or report",null,"Downtown Zoning Study · adopted: basic 14:1 floor area ratio with bonus provisions for BART access, plazas and sidewalk widening","unverified","C124899682",58,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n57",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:58/6",1978,1968,"1968","action","study or report",null,"1968 Zoning Code and Map Amendments · other: 20 percent bonus for direct transit access to BART","unverified","C124899682",58,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n57",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:42/5",1977,1968,"1968","measure","study or report",null,"San Francisco downtown zoning ordinance · other: Divided downtown into four zoning districts: downtown office, retail, general commercial, support","unverified","C124906302",42,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n41",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:42/6",1977,1968,"1968","measure","study or report",null,"San Francisco downtown zoning ordinance · other: Up to 20 percent FAR bonus for direct entranceway to BART","unverified","C124906302",42,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n41",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:42/7",1977,1968,"1968","measure","study or report",null,"San Francisco downtown zoning ordinance · other: 10 percent FAR bonus for new building within 750 feet of BART","unverified","C124906302",42,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n41",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:42/8",1977,1968,"1968","measure","study or report",null,"San Francisco downtown zoning ordinance · other: Maximum 7 percent of gross floor area permitted for parking","unverified","C124906302",42,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n41",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:45/3",1979,1968,"1968","event","study or report",null,"Downtown development management system · adopted: present system for managing downtown development adopted","unverified","C124924423",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n44",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:41/1",1983,1968,"1968","finding","plan",null,"C-3 use districts · other: C-3-O (Office), C-3-R (Retail), C-3-G (General Commercial), and C-3-S (Support) districts created in 1968","unverified","c124897620",41,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n40",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:203/1",1979,1968,"1968-1972","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown parking demand · finding: tremendous increase in office, commercial, and retail growth in the Downtown since 1968 code revisions and 1972 transportation plan","unverified","C124924016",203,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n202",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:55/7",1978,1969,"1969","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco urban core case study area · other: Median family income (1969 dollars)","unverified","C124899682",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n54",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed64sanfrich|g810",1969,1969,"1969-04-28",null,"transport","pending","Vote on opposing downtown commuter bus plans delayed to May 5.","unverified","journalofproceed64sanfrich",390,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed64sanfrich/page/n390",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed64sanfrich:406/2",1969,1969,"1969-05-05","resolution","transit","passed","Opposition declared to commuter bus plans that would add to congestion in downtown San Francisco streets.","quoted","journalofproceed64sanfrich",406,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed64sanfrich/page/n406",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.4],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed64sanfrich|g1777",1969,1969,"1969-09-22","motion","traffic","passed","Board asked for report on downtown parking and shuttles","quoted","journalofproceed64sanfrich",899,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed64sanfrich/page/n899",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-0.76],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:66/5",1978,1969,"1969-1975","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown office buildings completed 1969-1975 · floor area sqft: seven new office buildings adding 4.8 million square feet","unverified","C124899682",66,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n65",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:177/1",1970,1970,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Marin rapid transit alternative 1 (Geary Street underground) · alternative: Automated vehicles via second deck on Golden Gate Bridge, connecting to downtown via Geary Street underground","unverified","C124878301",177,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n176","Geary Street",null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:177/2",1970,1970,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Marin rapid transit alternative 2 (Columbus Avenue subway) · alternative: Underwater tube from Sausalito with subway under Columbus Avenue to downtown","unverified","C124878301",177,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n176","Columbus Avenue",null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:180/1",1970,1970,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco commuter parking tax · alternative: Impose taxes on commuters parking in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124878301",180,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n179",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:439/1",1970,1970,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Downtown Parking and Traffic Survey (DPATS) · cost usd","unverified","C124878301",439,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n438",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:98/1",1970,1970,"","finding","study or report",null,"downtown trams (transportation proposal) · finding: may not be able to cover costs by using vehicles as delivery vans for business","unverified","C124878301",98,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n97",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:176/1",1970,1970,"","measure","study or report",null,"Department of City Planning · proposes: freeway route from downtown San Francisco to the Golden Gate Bridge","unverified","C124878408",176,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n175",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:182/2",1970,1970,"","site","study or report",null,"AC Transit bus terminal, downtown San Francisco · other: bus terminal adjacent to the financial district","unverified","C124878408",182,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n181",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:200/10001",1970,1970,"","finding","study or report",null,"Muni transit ridership downtown · other: 45.7% of people leaving downtown use mass transit","unverified","C124878408",200,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n199",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:217/1",1970,1970,"","site","study or report",null,"Downtown Parking & Traffic Survey (DPATS) functional areas · other: Functional areas defined by the Department of City Planning, downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124878408",217,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n216",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901171:21/1",1970,1970,"","project","study or report",null,"Golden Gateway · other: redevelopment program bringing office buildings, hotels, apartments, theaters and parks to downtown","unverified","C124901171",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124901171/page/n20",null,null,null,"Golden Gate commuter ferryboat system : San Francisco-Marin crossing","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901171:21/2",1970,1970,"","project","study or report",null,"Yerba Buena Center · other: redevelopment program bringing office buildings, hotels, apartments, theaters and parks to downtown",null,"C124901171",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124901171/page/n20",null,null,null,"Golden Gate commuter ferryboat system : San Francisco-Marin crossing","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:181/2",1970,1970,"1970","recommendation","study or report",null,"downtown commuter parking · recommendation: taxes on commuters parking downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124878301",181,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n180",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:406/1",1970,1970,"1970","alternative","study or report",null,"downtown tram · proposes: 20 passengers capacity","unverified","C124878301",406,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n405",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:55/2",1978,1970,"1970","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco urban core case study area · other: Employment 1970","unverified","C124899682",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n54",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:55/5",1978,1970,"1970","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco urban core case study area · other: Resident population 1970","unverified","C124899682",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n54",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed65sanfrich:1088/1",1970,1970,"1970-12-14","ordinance","transit","passed first reading","Board passed on first reading $768,000 (≈ $6.7 million in 2026 dollars) from [name withheld] to relocate Municipal Railway trolley lines in downtown San Francisco.","quoted","journalofproceed65sanfrich",1088,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed65sanfrich/page/n1083",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,5.26],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:59/6",1979,1970,"1970-2000","finding","study or report",null,"Department of City Planning projection · other: downtown office space projection 53 million to 64 million sq.ft.","unverified","C124924423",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n58",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:50/1",1978,1970,"1970-76","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco retail stores · other: sample of stores whose pre-BART and post-BART sales tax data (1970-76) were obtained","unverified","C124899682",50,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n49",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:25/5",1979,1971,"1971","project","study or report",null,"Urban Design Plan of the San Francisco Master Plan · other: statement of guiding policy, not binding regulations","unverified","C124924016",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n24",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:25/3",1979,1971,"1971-1978","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown office space in buildings over 10 stories · other: 12,380,000 gross sq ft constructed 1971-1978 (annual average 1,547,500); 5,600,000 sq ft planned 1979-1983","unverified","C124924423",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n24",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:45/2",1979,1972,"1972","event","study or report",null,"Downtown height and bulk controls · adopted: height and bulk controls adopted","unverified","C124924423",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n44",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed67sanfrich|g645",1972,1972,"1972-03-20","resolution","budget","passed","Proposal to cancel Downtown church's 1970-71 property tax; no vote shown.","quoted","journalofproceed67sanfrich",254,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed67sanfrich/page/n253",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed67sanfrich:1131/2",1972,1972,"1972-11-27","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Proposed ordinance setting separate parking rules for yellow zones in downtown San Francisco passed for second reading.","quoted","journalofproceed67sanfrich",1131,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed67sanfrich/page/n1130",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.75],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305323:117/1",1973,1973,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco high-rise office development · other: may increase employment density and traffic accidents in the downtown area","unverified","c123305323",117,"https://archive.org/details/c123305323/page/n116",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Summary : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:117/1",1973,1973,"","finding","study or report",null,"downtown shopping survey, section IV.A · finding: traffic congestion: 22 of 38 respondents reported it caused decreased downtown shopping","unverified","c123305332",117,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n116",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:117/2",1973,1973,"","finding","study or report",null,"downtown shopping survey, section IV.A · finding: insufficient convenient parking: 20 of 38 respondents reported it caused decreased downtown shopping","unverified","c123305332",117,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n116",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:117/3",1973,1973,"","finding","study or report",null,"downtown shopping survey, section IV.A · finding: public transportation: 10 respondents reported it caused decreased downtown shopping","unverified","c123305332",117,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n116",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:117/4",1973,1973,"","finding","study or report",null,"downtown shopping survey, section IV.A · finding: sidewalk congestion: 8 respondents reported it caused decreased downtown shopping","unverified","c123305332",117,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n116",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:145/1",1973,1973,"","finding","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco shopping · finding: traffic congestion caused decreased shopping","unverified","c123305332",145,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n144",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:145/2",1973,1973,"","finding","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco shopping · finding: insufficient convenient parking caused decreased shopping","unverified","c123305332",145,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n144",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:145/3",1973,1973,"","finding","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco shopping · finding: threat of crime would decrease shopping if worsened","unverified","c123305332",145,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n144",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:145/4",1973,1973,"","finding","study or report",null,"downtown high-rise buildings · finding: shadows cast by big buildings caused decreased shopping","unverified","c123305332",145,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n144",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:181/1",1973,1973,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown retail district · finding: Denser downtown development would bring more customers to shops, assuming workers are not dissuaded by crowds or environmental concerns","unverified","c123305332",181,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n180",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:181/2",1973,1973,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown retail district · finding: Parking shortage in the downtown retail area is directly related to density of development and aggravated by denser development","unverified","c123305332",181,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n180",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:257/3",1973,1973,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco downtown trip time distribution · finding: Peak hour generates more traffic in downtown San Francisco than in the other areas surveyed; the distribution for San Francisco is used in the analysis","unverified","c123305332",257,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n254",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:259/2",1973,1973,"","finding","study or report",null,"DPATS study estimate of downtown trips · other: 68% estimate of downtown trips generated from San Francisco (all vehicles)","unverified","c123305332",259,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n256",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:260/1",1973,1973,"","finding","study or report",null,"Automobile trip generation, Block 240 office · other: Office 664,988 sq.ft.; 6,250 automobile trips generated","unverified","c123305332",260,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n257",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:260/2",1973,1973,"","finding","study or report",null,"Automobile trip generation, Block 764 Federal [name withheld] offices · other: Federal Govt. offices 1,200,000 sq.ft.; 11,160 automobile trips generated","unverified","c123305332",260,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n257",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:120/1",1995,1973,"1973","finding","study or report",null,"Urban Design Element (1973) · finding: Preserve San Francisco's strong and continuous downtown street facades to maintain the area's distinctive character and spatial quality","unverified","C124914193",120,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n120",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:119/1",1973,1973,"1973","finding","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco shopping survey · finding: traffic and parking were again the most frequently cited factors deterring shopping","unverified","c123305332",119,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n118",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:119/2",1973,1973,"1973","finding","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco shopping survey · finding: threat of crime checked by twelve respondents as deterring shopping","unverified","c123305332",119,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n118",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:119/3",1973,1973,"1973","finding","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco shopping survey · finding: air pollution, traffic noise, construction noise, windiness and decrease in open space each checked by more than ten percent of respondents","unverified","c123305332",119,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n118",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:119/4",1973,1973,"1973","finding","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco shopping survey · finding: general visual appearance of high-rise buildings checked by four respondents as increasing shopping","unverified","c123305332",119,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n118",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:119/5",1973,1973,"1973","finding","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco shopping survey · finding: impressive size and scale of downtown buildings checked by six respondents as increasing shopping","unverified","c123305332",119,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n118",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:121/1",1973,1973,"1973","finding","study or report",null,"downtown shoppers survey · finding: parking and traffic were most frequently cited concerns","unverified","c123305332",121,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n120",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:121/2",1973,1973,"1973","finding","study or report",null,"downtown shoppers survey · finding: 50 percent of respondents would increase shopping downtown with more efficient public transportation","unverified","c123305332",121,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n120",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:121/3",1973,1973,"1973","finding","study or report",null,"downtown shoppers survey · finding: parking was first concern with 28 choices and 68 points; traffic congestion second with 26 choices and 55 points","unverified","c123305332",121,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n120",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:121/4",1973,1973,"1973","finding","study or report",null,"downtown shoppers survey · finding: transportation concern was checked by 35 of 38 respondents","unverified","c123305332",121,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n120",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:121/5",1973,1973,"1973","finding","study or report",null,"downtown transportation system · finding: any development alternative worsening downtown transportation will discourage shoppers","unverified","c123305332",121,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n120",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:123/1",1973,1973,"1973","finding","study or report",null,"downtown shopping survey · finding: threat of crime is not presently a major deterrent to downtown shopping","unverified","c123305332",123,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n122",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:123/2",1973,1973,"1973","finding","study or report",null,"downtown shopping survey · finding: environmental factors not presently deterring many people from downtown shopping","unverified","c123305332",123,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n122",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:123/3",1973,1973,"1973","finding","study or report",null,"high-rise buildings survey questions · finding: size and scale of buildings ranked last out of twelve choices in question IV.E","unverified","c123305332",123,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n122",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:269/2",1973,1973,"1973","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Parking and Traffic Survey (DPATS) · finding: has automobile, taxi and truck travel data at the block level only, with no distinction for land use","unverified","c123305332",269,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n266",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124892967:9/4",1976,1973,"1973","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco employment · jobs: 175,000 persons employed","unverified","c124892967",9,"https://archive.org/details/c124892967/page/n8",null,null,null,"Transportation conditions and trends : background information for the transportation strategy and programs report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:59/7",1979,1973,"1973-2000","finding","study or report",null,"[name withheld] projection · other: downtown office space projection 66 million to 76 million sq.ft.","unverified","C124924423",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n58",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124883817:23/1",1974,1974,"","site","study or report",null,"Mexican Trade and Cultural Center · other: site selected within Yerba Buena Center project area, downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124883817",23,"https://archive.org/details/C124883817/page/n22",null,null,null,"Establishment of Mayor's Office of Economic Development in San Francisco : first year final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123301983:20/1",1975,1974,"1974","event","study or report",null,"BART operating hours extension · event: BART operating hours extended until 10 PM during the Christmas 1974 shopping season","unverified","C123301983",20,"https://archive.org/details/C123301983/page/n19",null,null,null,"The Bay Area Rapid Transit System : current status and impacts /","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:60/1",1977,1974,"1974","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco traffic noise · other: sound levels ranged from Ldn 65 dB to Ldn 80 dB (as printed)","unverified","C124906302",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n59",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:61/1",1977,1974,"1974","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco noise map (Figure 6) · other: Noise contour map of downtown with Ldn legend (80 and 75 contour levels)","unverified","C124906302",61,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n60",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:228/10001",1983,1974,"1974","finding","study or report",null,"SPUR surveys 1974 methodology · other: 1,022 office employees in 4 firms from 11 high-rise office buildings; 818 hotel employees in 14 downtown hotels","unverified","c124896626",228,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n227",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:228/3",1983,1974,"1974","event","study or report",null,"1974 SPUR office worker survey · other: 11 high-rise office buildings in downtown San Francisco built since 1955","unverified","c124896626",228,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n227",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:228/4",1983,1974,"1974","event","study or report",null,"1974 SPUR office worker survey · other: 1,022 employees in 4 different firms","unverified","c124896626",228,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n227",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:541/1",1983,1974,"1974-1982","finding","study or report",null,"Wind tunnel studies of proposed buildings, downtown San Francisco · other: 52 proposed building designs tested in 34 wind tunnel studies","unverified","c124896626",541,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n540",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:59/5",1979,1974,"1974-1990","finding","study or report",null,"SPUR [name withheld] · other: office space projection 60 million to 80 million sq.ft.","unverified","C124924423",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n58",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123301974:48/1",1975,1975,"","site","study or report",null,"Study of Workers' Locational Decisions · other: Employment center surveyed by questionnaire and interview: downtown San Francisco","unverified","C123301974",48,"https://archive.org/details/C123301974/page/n47",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project research plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123301974:48/2",1975,1975,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Study of Workers' Locational Decisions · alternative: Option to cover only downtown San Francisco","unverified","C123301974",48,"https://archive.org/details/C123301974/page/n47",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project research plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123301974:48/3",1975,1975,"","measure","study or report",null,"Study of Workers' Locational Decisions · other: Sample of approximately 2,000 completed questionnaires and 200 completed interviews in each area, including downtown San Francisco","unverified","C123301974",48,"https://archive.org/details/C123301974/page/n47",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project research plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123301974:52/10001",1975,1975,"","project","study or report",null,"BART shopping and consumer service patterns study · other: approximately 200 completed interviews in each business district","unverified","C123301974",52,"https://archive.org/details/C123301974/page/n51",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project research plan","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123301983:14/1",1975,1975,"","building","study or report",null,"BART station, downtown San Francisco · cost usd: $26 million","unverified","C123301983",14,"https://archive.org/details/C123301983/page/n13",null,null,null,"The Bay Area Rapid Transit System : current status and impacts /","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124884963:155/2",1975,1975,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · finding: Central Downtown area alone accounts for almost half of total employment in the city although it contains only 3% of total land area","unverified","C124884963",155,"https://archive.org/details/C124884963/page/n154","Pacific Avenue",null,null,"Commercial and industrial activity in San Francisco : present characteristics and future trends : report to San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124884963:334/1",1975,1975,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco office-using sectors · finding: Comparative advantage for FIRE and business services is great enough to allow latitude in channeling and controlling growth","unverified","C124884963",334,"https://archive.org/details/C124884963/page/n333",null,null,null,"Commercial and industrial activity in San Francisco : present characteristics and future trends : report to San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123301974:52/1",1975,1975,"1975","measure","study or report",null,"BART retail sales and consumer services study (Work Element 5.9) · other: Consumer interviews in a sample of establishments in downtown San Francisco business district","unverified","C123301974",52,"https://archive.org/details/C123301974/page/n51",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project research plan","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123301974:52/2",1975,1975,"1975","measure","study or report",null,"BART retail sales and consumer services study (Work Element 5.9) · other: Approximately 200 completed interviews in each business district, including downtown San Francisco","unverified","C123301974",52,"https://archive.org/details/C123301974/page/n51",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project research plan","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123301974:55/2",1975,1975,"1975","site","study or report",null,"BART property value study · other: Study area: central city business district (downtown San Francisco)","unverified","C123301974",55,"https://archive.org/details/C123301974/page/n54",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project research plan","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123301974:56/2",1975,1975,"1975","site","study or report",null,"BART property value study · other: Study area: city business district, downtown San Francisco","unverified","C123301974",56,"https://archive.org/details/C123301974/page/n55",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project research plan","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:439/2",1970,1975,"1975","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown parking supply and demand, horizon year 1975 · finding: Estimated 1975 parking demand exceeds estimated supply by over 30,000 vehicles","unverified","C124878301",439,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n438",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:439/4",1970,1975,"1975","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown parking spaces needed · finding: 12,300 parking spaces needed to satisfy 1975 parking needs","unverified","C124878301",439,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n438",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:440/1",1970,1975,"1975","finding","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco parking · other: shortage of 12,300 spaces by 1975","unverified","C124878301",440,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n439",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:55/3",1978,1975,"1975","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco urban core case study area · other: Employment 1975","unverified","C124899682",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n54",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:55/6",1978,1975,"1975","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco urban core case study area · other: Resident population 1975","unverified","C124899682",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n54",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906205:68/1",1977,1975,"1975","finding","study or report",null,"BART station platforms, downtown San Francisco · finding: two distinct queuing patterns observed","unverified","C124906205",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124906205/page/n67",null,null,null,"Environmental impacts of BART : the user's experience","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906205:68/10001",1977,1975,"1975","finding","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco BART station platforms · finding: two distinct queuing patterns observed: transverse queues at exact door stops and elliptical crowding when stops are unsure","unverified","C124906205",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124906205/page/n67",null,null,null,"Environmental impacts of BART : the user's experience","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:43/1",1977,1975,"1975","finding","study or report",null,"Central Business District office space · floor area sqft: more than 50 million gross square feet of downtown office space","unverified","C124906302",43,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n42",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:43/2",1977,1975,"1975","finding","study or report",null,"Major downtown office buildings · floor area sqft: nearly 36 million gross square feet in buildings of 10 stories or more","unverified","C124906302",43,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n42",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:49/2",1977,1975,"1975","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco off-street parking · other: 65,000 off-street parking spaces","unverified","C124906302",49,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n48",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:21/9",1979,1975,"1975","finding","study or report",null,"SPUR [name withheld] · finding: approximately 41-46 percent of projected total city employment would be downtown office jobs","unverified","C124924423",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n20",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124892897:43/1",1975,1975,"1975","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Commercial Zoning Districts · other: Map 2 shows downtown commercial zoning districts","unverified","c124892897",43,"https://archive.org/details/c124892897/page/n42",null,null,null,"Parking in San Francisco : recommendations for policies and implementation actions : a report to the San Francisco City Planning Department","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697441:37/1",1976,1976,"","project","study or report",null,"BART Market Street street and pedestrian improvements · cost usd: approximately $34 million","unverified","C101697441",37,"https://archive.org/details/C101697441/page/n36","Market Street",null,null,"Impacts of BART on visual quality : interim service findings /","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697441:37/2",1976,1976,"","project","study or report",null,"Market Street improvements · other: new street trees, widened sidewalks with new paving, reproductions of historic street light fixtures and new street furniture","unverified","C101697441",37,"https://archive.org/details/C101697441/page/n36","Market Street",null,null,"Impacts of BART on visual quality : interim service findings /","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697441:37/3",1976,1976,"","finding","study or report",null,"Market Street · finding: changes in the visual environment from reconstruction of streets and pedestrian areas were most striking in downtown San Francisco, particularly along Market Street","unverified","C101697441",37,"https://archive.org/details/C101697441/page/n36","Market Street",null,null,"Impacts of BART on visual quality : interim service findings /","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697441:39/1",1976,1976,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART visual impact in downtown San Francisco · other: Major street improvements and plaza development have taken place in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C101697441",39,"https://archive.org/details/C101697441/page/n38",null,null,null,"Impacts of BART on visual quality : interim service findings /","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697441:57/1",1976,1976,"","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · other: Downtown served by BART station","unverified","C101697441",57,"https://archive.org/details/C101697441/page/n56",null,null,null,"Impacts of BART on visual quality : interim service findings /","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697441:63/1",1976,1976,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART plazas in downtown San Francisco · finding: Plazas are highly visible indications of the BART system although stations are not directly visible there","unverified","C101697441",63,"https://archive.org/details/C101697441/page/n62",null,null,null,"Impacts of BART on visual quality : interim service findings /","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697441:67/2",1976,1976,"","building","study or report",null,"Central downtown San Francisco office structures · stories: Multi-story office structures, some as high as 40 stories","unverified","C101697441",67,"https://archive.org/details/C101697441/page/n66",null,null,null,"Impacts of BART on visual quality : interim service findings /","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697441:67/3",1976,1976,"","site","study or report",null,"BART line in central downtown San Francisco · other: All BART line in central downtown areas is in subway","unverified","C101697441",67,"https://archive.org/details/C101697441/page/n66",null,null,null,"Impacts of BART on visual quality : interim service findings /","n","m",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697450:57/1",1976,1976,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART construction impacts survey sample · other: Downtown respondents excluded: those closest to Civic Center, Powell, Montgomery and Embarcadero stations","unverified","C101697450",57,"https://archive.org/details/C101697450/page/n56","Market Street",null,null,"Analysis of pre-BART urban residential environment survey /","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697584:29/1",1976,1976,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown street improvements San Francisco Oakland Berkeley · finding: Largely BART-induced street improvements eased pedestrian and vehicle flow and improved parking","unverified","C101697584",29,"https://archive.org/details/C101697584/page/n28",null,null,null,"Impacts of BART on the social environment : interim service findings /","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697584:41/2",1976,1976,"","site","study or report",null,"BART urban station areas · other: urban BART station area in downtown San Francisco; subway station, downtown and commercial in character","unverified","C101697584",41,"https://archive.org/details/C101697584/page/n40",null,null,null,"Impacts of BART on the social environment : interim service findings /","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889398:10/1",1976,1976,"","finding","study or report",null,"Tourist survey of busy port perception · finding: Tourists are not seeing a busy port","unverified","C124889398",10,"https://archive.org/details/C124889398/page/n9",null,null,null,"Some measures of the impact of the port of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:14/4",1976,1976,"","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills downtown parking demand · other: about 1,500 parking stalls needed, or 2 percent of 64,820 off-street spaces in downtown area","unverified","C124924654",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n13",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:15/4",1976,1976,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills direct transit service to downtown San Francisco · recommendation: Institute direct no-transfer transit service from Crocker Hills to downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124924654",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n14",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924654:15/5",1976,1976,"","finding","study or report",null,"Crocker Hills direct transit service to downtown San Francisco · finding: Need and viability of direct transit service not yet determined; may be addressed at specific plan stage","unverified","C124924654",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124924654/page/n14",null,null,null,"Review of effects on San Francisco of the proposed Crocker Hills development","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124892967:61/1",1976,1976,"","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco parking supply · other: approximately 8,097 on-street spaces and 64,820 off-street spaces","unverified","c124892967",61,"https://archive.org/details/c124892967/page/n60",null,null,null,"Transportation conditions and trends : background information for the transportation strategy and programs report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:149/3",1987,1976,"1976","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco CEQA categorical exemption guidelines · recommendation: exempt from CEQA review buildings rated 1 or higher in the 1976 Planning Department survey","unverified","C124889732",149,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n148",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:65/6",1978,1976,"1976","finding","study or report",null,"BART users boarding at downtown stations · other: 63 percent male, 37 percent female","unverified","C124899682",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n64","Market Street",null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:86/2",1978,1976,"1976","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco BART users · other: Percent earning over $15,000 in 1976: 62.8","unverified","C124899682",86,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n85",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901533:15/3",1977,1976,"1976","finding","study or report",null,"Golden Gate College · other: BART utilized by 16% of the students","unverified","C124901533",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124901533/page/n14",null,null,null,"Impacts of BART on Bay Area institutions of higher education and other students /","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697584:19/1",1976,1976,"during BART construction","event","study or report",null,"BART construction detours and obstructions, downtown San Francisco · event: detours and obstructions lasting more than seven years in San Francisco","unverified","C101697584",19,"https://archive.org/details/C101697584/page/n18",null,null,null,"Impacts of BART on the social environment : interim service findings /","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123307534:11/2",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco street railway routes · other: Competitive lines focused on downtown, producing a predominantly radial network of horse, cable and electric streetcar lines","unverified","C123307534",11,"https://archive.org/details/C123307534/page/n10",null,null,null,"5 year plan, 1977-1982 : issue paper 2 : Transit planning thought in San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123307534:36/5",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco trips · finding: Downtown is origin or destination of fewer than one-third of trips made within San Francisco","unverified","C123307534",36,"https://archive.org/details/C123307534/page/n35",null,null,null,"5 year plan, 1977-1982 : issue paper 2 : Transit planning thought in San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123307534:50/1",1977,1977,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown free-transit zone · recommendation: recommended for further investigation by the Department of City Planning","unverified","C123307534",50,"https://archive.org/details/C123307534/page/n49",null,null,null,"5 year plan, 1977-1982 : issue paper 2 : Transit planning thought in San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123321093:20/1",1977,1977,"","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · other: dominant retail, financial, managerial, communications, and distribution center of Northern California","unverified","C123321093",20,"https://archive.org/details/C123321093/page/n19",null,null,null,"Political influence in transportation planning : the San Francisco Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission's regional transportation plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901533:27/1",1977,1977,"","site","study or report",null,"Golden Gate University · other: downtown San Francisco, within easy walking distance of Montgomery Street and Embarcadero BART stations","unverified","C124901533",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124901533/page/n26",null,null,null,"Impacts of BART on Bay Area institutions of higher education and other students /","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901533:27/4",1977,1977,"","site","study or report",null,"Greyhound bus stops serving Napa County · other: located within blocks of the GGU campus","unverified","C124901533",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124901533/page/n26",null,null,null,"Impacts of BART on Bay Area institutions of higher education and other students /","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901533:27/6",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Golden Gate University · other: 70% of students attend evening classes solely","unverified","C124901533",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124901533/page/n26",null,null,null,"Impacts of BART on Bay Area institutions of higher education and other students /","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906108:105/1",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART interim service to downtown San Francisco · finding: less than full service to the downtown San Francisco area, as one respondent believes","unverified","C124906108",105,"https://archive.org/details/C124906108/page/n104",null,null,null,"Social impacts of BART on Bay Area families and life styles : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906108:121/1",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART · finding: BART influences some shopping trips to the downtown center of San Francisco","unverified","C124906108",121,"https://archive.org/details/C124906108/page/n120",null,null,null,"Social impacts of BART on Bay Area families and life styles : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906108:46/1",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"New Suburbanites employment location (BART BART life style study) · other: employment principally located in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124906108",46,"https://archive.org/details/C124906108/page/n45",null,null,null,"Social impacts of BART on Bay Area families and life styles : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906108:60/2",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART and non-essential downtown shopping trips · finding: Persons with car access to downtown shopping choose BART for an easier, more interesting trip or a special outing","unverified","C124906108",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124906108/page/n59",null,null,null,"Social impacts of BART on Bay Area families and life styles : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906108:61/2",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART shopping trips to San Francisco · other: shift in shopping locations away from closer or suburban centers toward downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124906108",61,"https://archive.org/details/C124906108/page/n60",null,null,null,"Social impacts of BART on Bay Area families and life styles : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906108:64/1",1977,1977,"","measure","study or report",null,"Liberty House Department Store promotion · other: free BART ticket with each purchase over $5.00","unverified","C124906108",64,"https://archive.org/details/C124906108/page/n63",null,null,null,"Social impacts of BART on Bay Area families and life styles : technical memorandum","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906108:64/2",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART non-routine shopping trips · finding: infrequent BART users report shopping in downtown San Francisco as a relatively frequent non-routine trip purpose","unverified","C124906108",64,"https://archive.org/details/C124906108/page/n63",null,null,null,"Social impacts of BART on Bay Area families and life styles : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906108:66/1",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART work commuter (Mission & 24th Street, Downtown San Francisco, no car) · finding: Changed work hours from 8 to 5 to 9 to 6 to ride BART when it is less crowded","unverified","C124906108",66,"https://archive.org/details/C124906108/page/n65","Mission Street",null,null,"Social impacts of BART on Bay Area families and life styles : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906108:88/1",1977,1977,"","event","study or report",null,"A. · other: rides BART every other week to downtown San Francisco for shopping","unverified","C124906108",88,"https://archive.org/details/C124906108/page/n87",null,null,null,"Social impacts of BART on Bay Area families and life styles : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906205:100/2",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco BART stations · finding: Patrons favor certain sets of exit gates even though others are open; only 20 - 30 steps are saved by using the north gates","unverified","C124906205",100,"https://archive.org/details/C124906205/page/n99",null,null,null,"Environmental impacts of BART : the user's experience","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906205:42/3",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Directional signs to BART stations in downtown San Francisco · other: directional signs at major pedestrian intersections within a two- to three-block radius of BART stations","unverified","C124906205",42,"https://archive.org/details/C124906205/page/n41",null,null,null,"Environmental impacts of BART : the user's experience","n","m",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906205:47/5",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco BART subway entrances · finding: BART signs are absent from the street, making subway entrances even harder for new or infrequent users to identify","unverified","C124906205",47,"https://archive.org/details/C124906205/page/n46",null,null,null,"Environmental impacts of BART : the user's experience","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906205:65/2",1977,1977,"","site","study or report",null,"Market Street subway stations · other: four subway stations (Embarcadero, Montgomery, Powell, Civic Center) each include a separate MUNI platform","unverified","C124906205",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124906205/page/n64","Market Street",null,null,"Environmental impacts of BART : the user's experience","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906205:65/3",1977,1977,"","site","study or report",null,"MUNI platforms in Market Street subway stations · other: MUNI system not yet in operation; only effect on BART travelers is a longer vertical descent to the platform","unverified","C124906205",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124906205/page/n64","Market Street",null,null,"Environmental impacts of BART : the user's experience","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906205:70/1",1977,1977,"","measure","study or report",null,"BART downtown San Francisco stations · other: six-minute headway between trains","unverified","C124906205",70,"https://archive.org/details/C124906205/page/n69",null,null,null,"Environmental impacts of BART : the user's experience","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906296:18/1",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART minority ridership destination stations · finding: Destination station distribution of minority BART riders similar to majority riders, with emphasis on downtown San Francisco stations","unverified","C124906296",18,"https://archive.org/details/C124906296/page/n17",null,null,null,"BART impacts on travel by ethnic minorities : working paper","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906296:64/2",1977,1977,"","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco BART stations (Table 12 footnote 6) · other: Civic Center, Powell and Montgomery stations","unverified","C124906296",64,"https://archive.org/details/C124906296/page/n63",null,null,null,"BART impacts on travel by ethnic minorities : working paper","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906296:65/1",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART travel by ethnic groups · finding: Downtown San Francisco stations are most often the destinations for all groups during morning peak and daytime off-peak travel","unverified","C124906296",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124906296/page/n64",null,null,null,"BART impacts on travel by ethnic minorities : working paper","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906296:78/2",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Express bus versus BART for trips to downtown San Francisco · finding: express bus service considerably faster and more reliable than BART for trips to the San Francisco business district","unverified","C124906296",78,"https://archive.org/details/C124906296/page/n77",null,null,null,"BART impacts on travel by ethnic minorities : working paper","n","m",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:12/3",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · other: Downtown San Francisco noise map","unverified","C124906302",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n11",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:13/7",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco zoning ordinance · other: building bonus provisions in the City's zoning ordinance link BART to development","unverified","C124906302",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n12",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:14/1",1977,1977,"","measure","study or report",null,"San Francisco zoning ordinance building bonus · other: 20 percent increase in floor area ratio for direct entranceway to BART station","unverified","C124906302",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n13",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:14/2",1977,1977,"","measure","study or report",null,"San Francisco zoning ordinance building bonus · other: 10 percent bonus for locating a new building within 750 feet of a BART station","unverified","C124906302",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n13",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:14/3",1977,1977,"","project","study or report",null,"Yerba Buena project · other: available for non-cash credits toward federal grants","unverified","C124906302",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n13",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:16/2",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco development · finding: major impacts are associated with the massive concentration of high-rise buildings","unverified","C124906302",16,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n15",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:16/3",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco automobile-related impacts · finding: automobile-related impacts (air quality and noise) relatively insignificant","unverified","C124906302",16,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n15",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:32/1",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART station areas (downtown San Francisco redevelopment) · finding: Actual development change occurred at only 12 stations, mostly in fully developed areas; most change was redevelopment, including downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124906302",32,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n31",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:32/10001",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART station areas · other: Redevelopment has been most of the change, including in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124906302",32,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n31",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:34/1",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART stations, downtown San Francisco · finding: intense high-rise development near the downtown San Francisco stations","unverified","C124906302",34,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n33",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:44/13",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown office buildings with direct BART entrances · other: Only 3 or 4 buildings provided direct entrances to BART stations","unverified","C124906302",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n43",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:45/2",1977,1977,"","building","study or report",null,"Major downtown office buildings · height ft: at least 10 stories or 118 feet","unverified","C124906302",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n44",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:58/1",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco commercial office development · finding: Induced changes in sound levels, climate, air quality and visual attributes of the city","unverified","C124906302",58,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n57",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:58/3",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART-induced impacts in downtown San Francisco · finding: No attempt made to determine the quantity and quality of specifically BART-induced impacts","unverified","C124906302",58,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n57",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:64/2",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"New development, downtown San Francisco · finding: Effects of new development on localized air quality are expected to be minimal","unverified","C124906302",64,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n63",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:65/1",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco high-rise office buildings · finding: Major visual effects: creation of views, obstruction of views, limitation of spaciousness, reduction of natural light (cast shadows)","unverified","C124906302",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n64",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:65/2",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco high-rise office buildings · finding: New high-rise buildings sometimes create view opportunities for persons inside, providing visual benefits","unverified","C124906302",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n64",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:65/3",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"SPUR report · finding: Increased rates of view obstruction occur as the height and density of new development increase","unverified","C124906302",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n64",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:65/4",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco high-rise office buildings · finding: High-rise buildings cause a sense of environmental constriction and reduce the amount of light reaching the street","unverified","C124906302",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n64",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:66/1",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"downtown high-rise district · other: new downtown office buildings concentrated in one area forming a distinct high-rise district","unverified","C124906302",66,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n65",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:66/2",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"downtown new buildings · other: shadows create an area receiving very little bright daylight at street level","unverified","C124906302",66,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n65",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:66/3",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"downtown new buildings · other: overwhelm smaller-scaled buildings, obstruct views and keep sunlight from reaching ground level","unverified","C124906302",66,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n65",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:66/4",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"downtown energy demand · other: considerable increase in water, gas and electricity demands of downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124906302",66,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n65",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:71/1",1977,1977,"","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco BART stations · other: over one-third of total system activity","unverified","C124906302",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n70",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:83/1",1977,1977,"","event","study or report",null,"Social Security Payment Center · jobs: approximately 2,000 jobs transferred from downtown San Francisco to downtown Richmond","unverified","C124906302",83,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n82",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:83/2",1977,1977,"","building","study or report",null,"Social Security Payment Center · other: formerly housed in four leased locations and one federal-government-owned location in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124906302",83,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n82",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906311:116/1",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART station area population density · finding: over 60 residents per gross residential acre in the downtown areas of Oakland and San Francisco","unverified","C124906311",116,"https://archive.org/details/C124906311/page/n115",null,null,null,"A description of BART : its facilities, service and surroundings","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906311:117/5",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART stations in downtown San Francisco · finding: Elderly residents over 20 percent of population near the four downtown stations","unverified","C124906311",117,"https://archive.org/details/C124906311/page/n116",null,null,null,"A description of BART : its facilities, service and surroundings","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906311:21/1",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART stations in downtown San Francisco · other: over 20 percent of nearby residents are elderly","unverified","C124906311",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124906311/page/n20",null,null,null,"A description of BART : its facilities, service and surroundings","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906311:41/1",1977,1977,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Mateo Transit District (SamTrans) · other: Bus service to downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124906311",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124906311/page/n40",null,null,null,"A description of BART : its facilities, service and surroundings","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906311:51/1",1977,1977,"","action","study or report",null,"BART downtown subway cut-and-cover construction · other: Construction began with relocation of utilities, then underpinning, closing of vaults, decking, and construction under the decking","unverified","C124906311",51,"https://archive.org/details/C124906311/page/n50",null,null,null,"A description of BART : its facilities, service and surroundings","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906311:66/1",1977,1977,"","site","study or report",null,"Montgomery Street BART station · other: eight entrances","unverified","C124906311",66,"https://archive.org/details/C124906311/page/n65","Montgomery Street",null,null,"A description of BART : its facilities, service and surroundings","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906311:84/1",1977,1977,"","measure","study or report",null,"BART · other: 6-minute headways in downtown San Francisco and Oakland","unverified","C124906311",84,"https://archive.org/details/C124906311/page/n83",null,null,null,"A description of BART : its facilities, service and surroundings","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906311:85/2",1977,1977,"","measure","study or report",null,"BART typical fares from downtown San Francisco · other: $.55 to Daly City; $.75 to Oakland; $1,00 to Richmond; $1.20 to Lafayette; $1.35 to Concord; $1.10 to San Leandro; $1.40 to Fremont","unverified","C124906311",85,"https://archive.org/details/C124906311/page/n84",null,null,null,"A description of BART : its facilities, service and surroundings","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906490:143/1",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"Zone 406 to zone 422 auto driving time · other: auto driving time estimated as 25 minutes","unverified","C124906490",143,"https://archive.org/details/C124906490/page/n142",null,null,null,"Exploratory network analyses of BART's impacts on accessibility : working report","n","a",0,-3.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123304912:15/1",1982,1977,"1977","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco work travel survey · other: 3,189 workers surveyed in downtown core area","unverified","C123304912",15,"https://archive.org/details/C123304912/page/n14",null,null,null,"Final report on the Joint Fare Prepayment Demonstration Design Project","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123304912:15/10001",1982,1977,"1977","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · other: 3,189 workers represented in 1977 survey of downtown core area","unverified","C123304912",15,"https://archive.org/details/C123304912/page/n14",null,null,null,"Final report on the Joint Fare Prepayment Demonstration Design Project","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123304912:15/10002",1982,1977,"1977","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · other: over 177,000 workers in downtown core area","unverified","C123304912",15,"https://archive.org/details/C123304912/page/n14",null,null,null,"Final report on the Joint Fare Prepayment Demonstration Design Project","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123304912:15/2",1982,1977,"1977","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco work travel · other: sample believed to represent over 177,000 workers","unverified","C123304912",15,"https://archive.org/details/C123304912/page/n14",null,null,null,"Final report on the Joint Fare Prepayment Demonstration Design Project","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123304912:15/3",1982,1977,"1977","finding","study or report",null,"Work travel to downtown San Francisco from San Francisco home area · other: 57% transit share, 92,156 trips (53.0%)","unverified","C123304912",15,"https://archive.org/details/C123304912/page/n14",null,null,null,"Final report on the Joint Fare Prepayment Demonstration Design Project","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123304912:16/4",1982,1977,"1977","finding","study or report",null,"1977 downtown survey definition · other: Downtown definition used for 1977 survey was more restrictive than some designations","unverified","C123304912",16,"https://archive.org/details/C123304912/page/n15",null,null,null,"Final report on the Joint Fare Prepayment Demonstration Design Project","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123307534:39/3",1977,1977,"1977","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown radial transit service · recommendation: rationalize downtown radial service so that better service can be concentrated on fewer lines","unverified","C123307534",39,"https://archive.org/details/C123307534/page/n38",null,null,null,"5 year plan, 1977-1982 : issue paper 2 : Transit planning thought in San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123321093:20/10001",1977,1977,"1977","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · other: dominant retail, financial, managerial, communications, and distribution center of Northern California",null,"C123321093",20,"https://archive.org/details/C123321093/page/n19",null,null,null,"Political influence in transportation planning : the San Francisco Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission's regional transportation plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:143/1",1978,1977,"1977","finding","study or report",null,"BART Walnut Creek shopping impacts (1977 Shoppers Survey) · finding: three of 48 new shoppers in downtown San Francisco who use BART formerly shopped in Walnut Creek","unverified","C124899682",143,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n142",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:61/1",1978,1977,"1977","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco station areas · other: 1977 land use changes and zoning map, Downtown San Francisco station areas","unverified","C124899682",61,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n60",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:86/4",1978,1977,"1977","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco BART users · other: Percent with four or more years college: 36.3","unverified","C124899682",86,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n85",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906108:142/1",1977,1977,"1977","finding","study or report",null,"BART service headways, downtown San Francisco line segment · other: scheduled 6-minute intervals in the downtown Oakland and San Francisco line segments","unverified","C124906108",142,"https://archive.org/details/C124906108/page/n141",null,null,null,"Social impacts of BART on Bay Area families and life styles : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906108:47/2",1977,1977,"1977","finding","study or report",null,"Cosmopolitan Urban Household downtown shopping trips · finding: BART appears to increase the frequency of downtown shopping trips to San Francisco and Oakland","unverified","C124906108",47,"https://archive.org/details/C124906108/page/n46",null,null,null,"Social impacts of BART on Bay Area families and life styles : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906108:47/3",1977,1977,"1977","finding","study or report",null,"Cosmopolitan Urban Household driving downtown · finding: Cosmopolitans often desire to avoid the problems of driving and parking downtown, particularly in San Francisco","unverified","C124906108",47,"https://archive.org/details/C124906108/page/n46",null,null,null,"Social impacts of BART on Bay Area families and life styles : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906296:38/2",1977,1977,"1977","measure","study or report",null,"Mission Street jitney service · other: Privately-owned mini bus jitney service paralleling BART between downtown San Francisco and Daly City","unverified","C124906296",38,"https://archive.org/details/C124906296/page/n37","Mission Street",null,null,"BART impacts on travel by ethnic minorities : working paper","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:21/1",1977,1977,"1977","finding","study or report",null,"BART indirect environmental impacts study · finding: In some areas (e.g., downtown San Francisco) forces far beyond BART's sphere of influence have been at work to exert change","unverified","C124906302",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n20",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:41/1",1977,1977,"1977","finding","study or report",null,"BART station areas, downtown San Francisco · finding: have experienced the most dramatic development changes","unverified","C124906302",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n40",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","m",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:62/1",1977,1977,"1977","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco high-rise office buildings · finding: wind impact on pedestrians is one of the most critical direct impacts of the new development","unverified","C124906302",62,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n61",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:62/2",1977,1977,"1977","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco high-rise office buildings · finding: new high-rise office buildings cause a deflection of upper winds down to the sidewalk level","unverified","C124906302",62,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n61",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906311:91/1",1977,1977,"1977","site","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco BART stations · other: one-third of total system station exits all day; two-thirds during the morning peak","unverified","C124906311",91,"https://archive.org/details/C124906311/page/n90",null,null,null,"A description of BART : its facilities, service and surroundings","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906409:18/10001",1978,1977,"1977","action","study or report",null,"Workplace Location Survey (TRA) · other: two-step survey method employed","unverified","C124906409",18,"https://archive.org/details/C124906409/page/n17",null,null,null,"Study of workers' location decisions : working paper","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906409:18/10002",1978,1977,"1977","action","study or report",null,"Workplace Location Survey (TRA) · other: weighted sample of approximately 300 workers with recent job location changes","unverified","C124906409",18,"https://archive.org/details/C124906409/page/n17",null,null,null,"Study of workers' location decisions : working paper","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899910:60/1",1977,1977,"August 26, 1976","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco LRV terminal · recommendation: Design and construction of a proper operating loop at the downtown San Francisco LRV terminal be undertaken at the earliest possible time","unverified","C124899910",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124899910/page/n59",null,null,null,"5 year plan, 1977-1982 : issue paper 1 : MUNI metro, issues and strategies","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:49/6",1977,1977,"June 1977","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco BART stations · other: Nearly 47,000 daily BART exits from the four downtown San Francisco stations","unverified","C124906302",49,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n48",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899910:55/1",1977,1977,"March 24, 1975","recommendation","study or report",null,"Embarcadero Station LRV terminal · recommendation: single-track loop with adjacent storage for up to about four LRV units","unverified","C124899910",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124899910/page/n54","Embarcadero",null,null,"5 year plan, 1977-1982 : issue paper 1 : MUNI metro, issues and strategies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899910:55/2",1977,1977,"March 24, 1975","finding","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco LRV terminal · finding: a loop is far superior, from the operating standpoint, to any kind of stub terminal","unverified","C124899910",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124899910/page/n54",null,null,null,"5 year plan, 1977-1982 : issue paper 1 : MUNI metro, issues and strategies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899910:55/4",1977,1977,"March 24, 1975","finding","study or report",null,"downtown LRV subway operations, Embarcadero stub configuration · other: 2-1/2-to-2-minute minimum headways downtown with stub crossover","unverified","C124899910",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124899910/page/n54","Embarcadero",null,null,"5 year plan, 1977-1982 : issue paper 1 : MUNI metro, issues and strategies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909766:33/1",1977,1977,"May 1975","building","study or report",null,"Embarcadero BART Station · other: not open at time of 1975 areawide survey (only station not open)","unverified","C124909766",33,"https://archive.org/details/C124909766/page/n32",null,null,null,"Travel in the BART service area /","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906311:44/3",1977,1977,"May 1976","event","study or report",null,"Embarcadero station · built: opened (last of 34 stations)","unverified","C124906311",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124906311/page/n43","Embarcadero",null,null,"A description of BART : its facilities, service and surroundings","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906311:16/10001",1977,1977,"November 1973","event","study or report",null,"Daly City line · event: Daly City line opened to downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124906311",16,"https://archive.org/details/C124906311/page/n15",null,null,null,"A description of BART : its facilities, service and surroundings","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906311:16/3",1977,1977,"November 1973","event","study or report",null,"Daly City line · event: opened to downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124906311",16,"https://archive.org/details/C124906311/page/n15",null,null,null,"A description of BART : its facilities, service and surroundings","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909766:11/2",1977,1977,"September 1974","project","study or report",null,"BART transbay tube · other: underwater transbay tube linking the downtowns of San Francisco and Oakland, the last stage opened","unverified","C124909766",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124909766/page/n10",null,null,null,"Travel in the BART service area /","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906311:88/1",1977,1977,"September 1977","site","study or report",null,"Montgomery station · other: average daily total patronage 15,998 (September 1977)","unverified","C124906311",88,"https://archive.org/details/C124906311/page/n87",null,null,null,"A description of BART : its facilities, service and surroundings","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:16/1",1977,1977,"past 15 years","finding","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco development · finding: most development over the past 15 years would have occurred there even without BART","unverified","C124906302",16,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n15",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:69/4",1977,1977,"past several years","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco traffic safety · finding: pedestrian and vehicle traffic safety has not changed significantly over the past several years","unverified","C124906302",69,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n68",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123310121:415/1",1978,1978,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Action 12 Transportation Controls · recommendation: Preferential treatment for buses and carpools on Route 101 from San Francisco Airport to downtown San Francisco","unverified","C123310121",415,"https://archive.org/details/C123310121/page/n414","101 Route 101",null,null,"Public comments and staff responses to Draft environmental management plan for the San Francisco Bay Region","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123310121:415/2",1978,1978,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Action 12 Transportation Controls · recommendation: Preferential treatment for buses and carpools on Route 80 from San Pablo Road to downtown San Francisco","unverified","C123310121",415,"https://archive.org/details/C123310121/page/n414","80 Route 80",null,null,"Public comments and staff responses to Draft environmental management plan for the San Francisco Bay Region","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123310121:418/1",1978,1978,"","action","study or report",null,"Auto-free zone, downtown San Francisco (Transportation Controls Action 13) · other: San Jose Chamber of Commerce: no specific position on the auto-free zone; not a strategy to apply regionwide","unverified","C123310121",418,"https://archive.org/details/C123310121/page/n417",null,null,null,"Public comments and staff responses to Draft environmental management plan for the San Francisco Bay Region","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:112/1",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Workers Survey · finding: Confirms the finding that BART serves white collar workers going to downtown Oakland and San Francisco","unverified","C124899682",112,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n111",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:25/1",1978,1978,"","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco case study area · other: selected by BART Impact Program as an urban core case study area","unverified","C124899682",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n24",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:25/10001",1978,1978,"","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · other: Selected by BART Impact Program as an urban core case study area",null,"C124899682",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n24",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:28/2",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco BART stations · other: ridership increasing at an average annual rate of 9 percent","unverified","C124899682",28,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n27",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:29/1",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART downtown San Francisco · other: Little dislocation of households or businesses in San Francisco","unverified","C124899682",29,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n28",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","m",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:29/2",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART downtown San Francisco · other: BART has served to reinforce the downtowns as viable business centers","unverified","C124899682",29,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n28",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:29/4",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"New office construction downtown San Francisco · other: Trend in new office construction toward and across Market Street from the traditional financial center","unverified","C124899682",29,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n28","Market Street",null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:32/1",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART · finding: BART's impacts have been greatest in the urban core downtown areas of San Francisco and Oakland","unverified","C124899682",32,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n31",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:32/10001",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART impacts in San Francisco downtown urban core · finding: BART's impacts have been greatest in the urban core downtown areas of San Francisco and Oakland",null,"C124899682",32,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n31",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:43/1",1978,1978,"","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · other: four subway BART stations along Market Street","unverified","C124899682",43,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n42","Market Street",null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:52/5",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco work trips · other: only 25 percent of work trips by auto","unverified","C124899682",52,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n51",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:54/1",1978,1978,"","site","study or report",null,"BART downtown stations · built: four BART stations built in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124899682",54,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n53",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:54/3",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco major projects and rezoning · other: denial of several major projects and major rezoning to avoid manhattanization of downtown","unverified","C124899682",54,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n53",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:56/1",1978,1978,"","event","study or report",null,"Montgomery, Powell, and Civic Center stations · adopted: station locations adopted","unverified","C124899682",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n55",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:56/3",1978,1978,"","event","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan · adopted: Downtown Plan adopted","unverified","C124899682",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n55",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:56/6",1978,1978,"","event","study or report",null,"Downtown height rezoning · adopted: Downtown height rezoning adopted","unverified","C124899682",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n55",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:56/7",1978,1978,"","event","study or report",null,"Muni-BART Transfer Plan · approved: approved","unverified","C124899682",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n55",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:58/9",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown office buildings using BART bonus · other: nine buildings have used the station proximity bonus","unverified","C124899682",58,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n57",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:63/10001",1978,1978,"","property_record","study or report",null,"BART property acquisition · acreage: 2.1 acres purchased","unverified","C124899682",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n62",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:63/10002",1978,1978,"","property_record","study or report",null,"BART property acquisition · other: 8,000 square feet classified as surplus","unverified","C124899682",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n62",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:63/8",1978,1978,"","action","study or report",null,"BART property acquisition, downtown San Francisco · acquired: 2.1 acres purchased, occupied by commercial and other uses","unverified","C124899682",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n62",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:63/9",1978,1978,"","property_record","study or report",null,"BART property acquisition, downtown San Francisco · other: surplus land classified","unverified","C124899682",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n62",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:64/6",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART work trips to downtown San Francisco · other: shortens average work trip travel time by about four minutes","unverified","C124899682",64,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n63",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-2.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:64/7",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART trips to downtown San Francisco · other: 48 percent of all trips made in the two-hour peak AM period","unverified","C124899682",64,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n63",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:65/1",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Montgomery and Embarcadero BART stations · other: 36 connecting bus lines","unverified","C124899682",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n64","Market Street",null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:65/2",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Powell and Civic Center BART stations · other: Powell 25 lines; Civic Center 22 lines","unverified","C124899682",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n64","Market Street",null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:65/3",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco BART stations · other: Poor park-and-ride access because BART provides no free parking","unverified","C124899682",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n64","Market Street",null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:65/5",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco BART commuters · other: Approximately 80 percent need no more than eight minutes' walk to workplace","unverified","C124899682",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n64",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-2.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:66/8",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART-attributable office buildings · other: seven buildings attributable in some degree to BART","unverified","C124899682",66,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n65",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:67/3",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco new shoppers · other: More than 40 percent of new shoppers said BART service induced them to shop downtown","unverified","C124899682",67,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n66",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:68/3",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco speculation · finding: no significant speculation has recently occurred in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124899682",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n67",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:68/5",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco indirect environmental effects · finding: street-level winds increased, an effect intensified at building corners and within arcades","unverified","C124899682",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n67",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:68/6",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco crime and security · finding: crime and security problems increased over time, but not disproportionately to citywide increases","unverified","C124899682",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n67",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:68/7",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco seismic hazard · finding: downtown largely built on artificial fill subject to strong earth movement; some area subject to subsidence and liquefaction","unverified","C124899682",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n67",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:69/4",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART subway stations, downtown San Francisco · finding: direct environmental impacts minimal or nonexistent","unverified","C124899682",69,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n68",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:69/5",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART stations, downtown San Francisco · finding: plazas at several stations are environmental improvements over prior conditions","unverified","C124899682",69,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n68",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:82/1",1978,1978,"","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco commute mode · other: 25 percent of work trips by automobile","unverified","C124899682",82,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n81",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:82/2",1978,1978,"","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco parking · other: $1.35 average parking cost for commuters","unverified","C124899682",82,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n81",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:87/1",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART impact on downtown San Francisco private development · finding: BART's direct impact on private sector development decisions has been limited to a small proportion of recent downtown development","unverified","C124899682",87,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n86",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:87/4",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco retail merchants, building owners, and employers · finding: probably will be major gainers in the long run from BART","unverified","C124899682",87,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n86",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899983:27/1",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART accessibility gains to employment centers · finding: Greatest percentage improvements in transit travel times from BART are from outlying suburban zones to downtown San Francisco, Oakland and Berkeley","unverified","C124899983",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124899983/page/n26",null,null,null,"Implications of BART's economic, employment and financial impacts for the transportation disadvantaged : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899983:34/3",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Market Street Redevelopment Project · finding: BART's successful bond referendum clearly helped to promote the Market Street Redevelopment Project, which attracted new office development to downtown areas served by BART","unverified","C124899983",34,"https://archive.org/details/C124899983/page/n33","Market Street",null,null,"Implications of BART's economic, employment and financial impacts for the transportation disadvantaged : technical memorandum","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899983:77/10001",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART land use and economic impact · finding: BART's impact on land use and economic activity has been largely restricted to downtown San Francisco and Oakland","unverified","C124899983",77,"https://archive.org/details/C124899983/page/n76",null,null,null,"Implications of BART's economic, employment and financial impacts for the transportation disadvantaged : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899983:9/1",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART accessibility to employment · finding: Largest accessibility gains from outlying residential areas to downtown workplaces in San Francisco, Oakland and Berkeley","unverified","C124899983",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124899983/page/n8",null,null,null,"Implications of BART's economic, employment and financial impacts for the transportation disadvantaged : technical memorandum","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899992:24/1",1978,1978,"","site","study or report",null,"BART sign easements, downtown San Francisco · other: sign easements involving no transfer of physical property and no land use impact","unverified","C124899992",24,"https://archive.org/details/C124899992/page/n23",null,null,null,"Study of BART's consumption of land and property : working paper","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906001:20/2",1978,1978,"","event","study or report",null,"Land Use and [name withheld] Element 4 survey · other: survey of people working in downtown San Francisco on BART's effects on workers' location decisions","unverified","C124906001",20,"https://archive.org/details/C124906001/page/n19",null,null,null,"Study of households' location decisions : working paper","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906001:66/4",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Walnut Creek movers · finding: downtown San Francisco work location is a key indicator of BART importance, R-square .36","unverified","C124906001",66,"https://archive.org/details/C124906001/page/n65",null,null,null,"Study of households' location decisions : working paper","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906001:69/3",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Walnut Creek respondents BART importance model · finding: Downtown San Francisco work location, downtown Oakland work location, and commute trip time explain 36 percent of variance in IBART","unverified","C124906001",69,"https://archive.org/details/C124906001/page/n68",null,null,null,"Study of households' location decisions : working paper","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906010:30/1",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART transit travel times to downtown San Francisco, low-income households · other: differ very little between With-BART and No-BART alternatives","unverified","C124906010",30,"https://archive.org/details/C124906010/page/n29",null,null,null,"Implications of BART's mobility and accessibility impacts for the transportation disadvantaged","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906010:30/2",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART transit travel time savings to downtown San Francisco, low-income group · other: reduced by an average of 7 minutes (-15%)","unverified","C124906010",30,"https://archive.org/details/C124906010/page/n29",null,null,null,"Implications of BART's mobility and accessibility impacts for the transportation disadvantaged","n","a",0,-2.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906117:19/1",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART-induced speculation, downtown San Francisco · finding: BART-induced speculation has not occurred in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124906117",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124906117/page/n18",null,null,null,"Study of property acquisition and occupancy : BART's effect on speculation, working paper","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906117:32/1",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART stations in downtown San Francisco · finding: no BART-related speculation apparent","unverified","C124906117",32,"https://archive.org/details/C124906117/page/n31",null,null,null,"Study of property acquisition and occupancy : BART's effect on speculation, working paper","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906117:35/1",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco central business district · finding: escaped speculation as defined in this study altogether","unverified","C124906117",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124906117/page/n34",null,null,null,"Study of property acquisition and occupancy : BART's effect on speculation, working paper","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906117:35/2",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco central business district · finding: long-term interests directed toward the San Francisco CBD outbid any speculative interests in available property","unverified","C124906117",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124906117/page/n34",null,null,null,"Study of property acquisition and occupancy : BART's effect on speculation, working paper","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906117:87/1",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco BART stations · finding: seems to have escaped speculation altogether","unverified","C124906117",87,"https://archive.org/details/C124906117/page/n86",null,null,null,"Study of property acquisition and occupancy : BART's effect on speculation, working paper","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906117:91/1",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Embarcadero station · other: response to a redevelopment plan for the area","unverified","C124906117",91,"https://archive.org/details/C124906117/page/n90",null,null,null,"Study of property acquisition and occupancy : BART's effect on speculation, working paper","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906117:91/5",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco BART speculation · finding: informants did not believe there had been BART-related speculation","unverified","C124906117",91,"https://archive.org/details/C124906117/page/n90",null,null,null,"Study of property acquisition and occupancy : BART's effect on speculation, working paper","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906117:93/3",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco BART area · finding: Chinese not considered to be affecting property transfers and not involved in BART-related speculation","unverified","C124906117",93,"https://archive.org/details/C124906117/page/n92",null,null,null,"Study of property acquisition and occupancy : BART's effect on speculation, working paper","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906214:15/1",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART Impact Program shopping patterns study · finding: New shoppers in downtown San Francisco showed higher propensity to be BART riders than long-term shoppers","unverified","C124906214",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124906214/page/n14",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : recommendations for long-term monitoring : working paper","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906214:28/1",1978,1978,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown Workers Survey · other: study of 314 workers who had switched or started work in downtown San Francisco or Oakland during the past three years","unverified","C124906214",28,"https://archive.org/details/C124906214/page/n27",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : recommendations for long-term monitoring : working paper","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906214:28/2",1978,1978,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown Workers Survey · cost usd: $100 average cost per completed interview","unverified","C124906214",28,"https://archive.org/details/C124906214/page/n27",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : recommendations for long-term monitoring : working paper","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906214:41/1",1978,1978,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Employers' Location Decisions monitoring · recommendation: Survey downtown San Francisco, downtown Oakland, Richmond, and 16th Street and Mission","unverified","C124906214",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124906214/page/n40",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : recommendations for long-term monitoring : working paper","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906214:42/1",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco office construction near BART · finding: new offices found to locate near BART stations; area should be monitored","unverified","C124906214",42,"https://archive.org/details/C124906214/page/n41",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : recommendations for long-term monitoring : working paper","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906214:44/1",1978,1978,"","site","study or report",null,"[name withheld] — Shopping Patterns monitoring · other: monitoring location: Downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124906214",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124906214/page/n43",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : recommendations for long-term monitoring : working paper","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906214:44/10002",1978,1978,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Shopper survey ([name withheld] — Shopping Patterns) · recommendation: Shopper survey locations include Downtown San Francisco and possibly Mission District","unverified","C124906214",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124906214/page/n43",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : recommendations for long-term monitoring : working paper","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906214:45/1",1978,1978,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Shopper survey ([name withheld] — Shopping Patterns) · recommendation: Shopper survey should continue in San Francisco, Oakland and Walnut Creek, where results suggest BART impacts","unverified","C124906214",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124906214/page/n44",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : recommendations for long-term monitoring : working paper","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906214:45/3",1978,1978,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Sales data analysis ([name withheld] — Sales Data) · recommendation: Seventeen previously studied sites, possibly downtown San Francisco only, to be sampled for sales trends","unverified","C124906214",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124906214/page/n44",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : recommendations for long-term monitoring : working paper","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906214:46/2",1978,1978,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Retail sales sales-tax data analysis · recommendation: Re-analyze retail sales data if patronage changes suggest significant sales impacts in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124906214",46,"https://archive.org/details/C124906214/page/n45",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : recommendations for long-term monitoring : working paper","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906409:14/1",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART influence on job location decisions, downtown San Francisco workers commuting from the East Bay · finding: 57 percent of downtown San Francisco workers commuting from the East Bay viewed BART as an important factor in job location decisions","unverified","C124906409",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124906409/page/n13",null,null,null,"Study of workers' location decisions : working paper","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906409:14/2",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco jobs and BART access · finding: Large number of jobs in downtown San Francisco close to BART, Bay Bridge congestion, and high parking charges give East Bay residents a high propensity to use transit","unverified","C124906409",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124906409/page/n13",null,null,null,"Study of workers' location decisions : working paper","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906409:16/1",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART effect on workers' location decisions · finding: BART will have a greater influence on downtown San Francisco location decisions over time than the No-BART Alternative","unverified","C124906409",16,"https://archive.org/details/C124906409/page/n15",null,null,null,"Study of workers' location decisions : working paper","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906409:18/1",1978,1978,"","measure","study or report",null,"Workplace Location Survey (TRA) · other: two-step intercept survey of workers in downtown San Francisco, downtown Oakland, and an Oakland industrial area","unverified","C124906409",18,"https://archive.org/details/C124906409/page/n17",null,null,null,"Study of workers' location decisions : working paper","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906409:34/2",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco workers downtown location · finding: perceived benefits of a downtown location outweighed the costs of potentially longer commutes","unverified","C124906409",34,"https://archive.org/details/C124906409/page/n33",null,null,null,"Study of workers' location decisions : working paper","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906409:54/1",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART · finding: BART to have greater influence on downtown San Francisco location decisions over time than the NBA","unverified","C124906409",54,"https://archive.org/details/C124906409/page/n53",null,null,null,"Study of workers' location decisions : working paper","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:171/1",1978,1978,"1978","agency","study or report",null,"Department of General Services · other: Division Chief, Department of General Services, Planning and Development","unverified","C124899682",171,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n170",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:171/2",1978,1978,"1978","agency","study or report",null,"Planning Department · other: Planning and Development Director, Planning Department","unverified","C124899682",171,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n170",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:55/8",1978,1978,"1978","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco BART stations · other: Average daily BART patronage, all downtown San Francisco stations","unverified","C124899682",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n54",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:68/1",1978,1978,"1978","finding","study or report",null,"BART impact on downtown San Francisco office rents · finding: BART may have had a slight positive impact on rents in nearby buildings","unverified","C124899682",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n67",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:7/1",1978,1978,"1978","site","study or report",null,"BART Impact Program case studies · other: downtown San Francisco case study (urban core area)","unverified","C124899682",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n6",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:86/3",1978,1978,"1978","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco BART users · other: Median age 34","unverified","C124899682",86,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n85",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906001:64/1",1978,1978,"1978","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco work location (CBD1) · other: work location in an MTC zone within 10-15 minutes walking distance of a BART station","unverified","C124906001",64,"https://archive.org/details/C124906001/page/n63",null,null,null,"Study of households' location decisions : working paper","n","a",0,-2.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906001:68/1",1978,1978,"1978","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown S.[name withheld] (CBD1) · other: coefficient -.4704 without mode as variable, t-statistic 4.25 (significant at 95% level) for importance of BART in residence location","unverified","C124906001",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124906001/page/n67",null,null,null,"Study of households' location decisions : working paper","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906010:11/1",1978,1978,"1978","finding","study or report",null,"BART transit travel time savings · finding: most substantial transit travel time savings for commuters from suburban areas to downtown San Francisco, Oakland and Berkeley","unverified","C124906010",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124906010/page/n10",null,null,null,"Implications of BART's mobility and accessibility impacts for the transportation disadvantaged","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906010:33/2",1978,1978,"1978","finding","study or report",null,"BART transit travel time savings · finding: Most substantial transit travel time savings for commuters from outlying suburbs to downtown San Francisco, Oakland and Berkeley","unverified","C124906010",33,"https://archive.org/details/C124906010/page/n32",null,null,null,"Implications of BART's mobility and accessibility impacts for the transportation disadvantaged","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906409:13/1",1978,1978,"1978","finding","study or report",null,"Study of workers' location decisions (Work Element 4) · finding: sample may be considered representative of the population of downtown San Francisco workers changing jobs or job locations","unverified","C124906409",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124906409/page/n12",null,null,null,"Study of workers' location decisions : working paper","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123310121:351/1",1978,1978,"1978-79","measure","study or report",null,"Auto control zone · other: San Francisco applied for and received a grant to study the auto control zone in detail; may be adopted in 1979","unverified","C123310121",351,"https://archive.org/details/C123310121/page/n350",null,null,null,"Public comments and staff responses to Draft environmental management plan for the San Francisco Bay Region","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906214:46/1",1978,1978,"Every three to five years","recommendation","study or report",null,"Property prices and rents monitoring · recommendation: Monitor downtown San Francisco property prices and rents every three to five years, priority High","unverified","C124906214",46,"https://archive.org/details/C124906214/page/n45",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : recommendations for long-term monitoring : working paper","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:28/1",1978,1978,"March 1978","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco BART stations · other: 49,100 daily trips in March 1978","unverified","C124899682",28,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n27",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:34/2",1978,1978,"March 1978","measure","study or report",null,"BART daily patronage, downtown San Francisco stations · other: 49,100 trips","unverified","C124899682",34,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n33",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:64/5",1978,1978,"March 1978","finding","study or report",null,"BART stations serving downtown San Francisco · other: about 49,100 daily BART trips started or ended at the four stations","unverified","C124899682",64,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n63",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:86/1",1978,1978,"March 1978","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco BART users · other: Daily BART patronage 49,100 trips","unverified","C124899682",86,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n85",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906214:40/1",1978,1978,"five to 10 years","recommendation","study or report",null,"Workers' Location Decisions monitoring (Workers Survey) · recommendation: Repeat the Workers Survey in downtown San Francisco and downtown Oakland, once again in five to 10 years, at low priority","unverified","C124906214",40,"https://archive.org/details/C124906214/page/n39",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : recommendations for long-term monitoring : working paper","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906214:41/3",1978,1978,"five years","recommendation","study or report",null,"Employers' Location Decisions monitoring · other: Once again in five years; priority moderate","unverified","C124906214",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124906214/page/n40",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : recommendations for long-term monitoring : working paper","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:66/1",1978,1978,"since 1960","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco office construction · other: averaging 1.2 million square feet per year","unverified","C124899682",66,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n65",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:29/3",1978,1978,"since 1965","measure","study or report",null,"New office space downtown San Francisco · floor area sqft: over 23 million square feet of new office space added","unverified","C124899682",29,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n28",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:52/3",1978,1978,"since 1965","building","study or report",null,"new office space in downtown San Francisco · built: over 23 million square feet of new office space","unverified","C124899682",52,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n51",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123306965:26/5",1979,1979,"","site","other",null,"San Francisco residential hotels · other: most residential hotels located in the downtown area","unverified","C123306965",26,"https://archive.org/details/C123306965/page/n25",null,null,null,"Housing resources for senior citizens in San Francisco : a project of Legal Assistance to the Elderly","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124904100:26/1",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"PG&E downtown steam loop · other: not a viable market; can take less than half the average production of a San Francisco resource recovery facility","unverified","C124904100",26,"https://archive.org/details/C124904100/page/n25",null,null,null,"A Technical assessment of the waste disposal concept in \"Progress report no. 1--conceptual design study, San Francisco resource conversion center.\"","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:105/1",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"Proposition O landmark bonus · floor area sqft: floor area bonus equal to 50,000 sq ft or landmark floor area, whichever greater","unverified","C124924016",105,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n104",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:105/2",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"Proposition O landmark bonus · floor area sqft: maximum floor area bonus of 100,000 sq ft","unverified","C124924016",105,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n104",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:105/3",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"Proposition O landmark bonus · other: applies to development site within 500 feet of a designated landmark if landmark preserved in perpetuity","unverified","C124924016",105,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n104",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:105/4",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"C-3 regulations · finding: C-3 regulations are contributing to the demolition of historic structures","unverified","C124924016",105,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n104",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:111/1",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Proposition O · finding: most effective feature is the downward adjustment of permitted floor area","unverified","C124924016",111,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n110",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:111/5",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Proposition O scenario · finding: more buildings displaced under Proposition O than under current C-3 regulations","unverified","C124924016",111,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n110",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:113/2",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown housing · other: Continued growth in Downtown employment will have a major impact on citywide and Downtown housing","unverified","C124924016",113,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n112",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:115/2",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown-generated housing demand · other: 10.5 percent of the total housing stock in the city","unverified","C124924016",115,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n114",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:115/4",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown employee housing · other: percentage of Downtown employees living in San Francisco will fail to reach 40 percent","unverified","C124924016",115,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n114",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:123/1",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco microclimate · finding: Public plazas and open spaces may be made less comfortable and, in some cases, unusable","unverified","C124924016",123,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n122",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:123/2",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"C-3 growth scenario · finding: Continued high-rise development will reduce sunlight at ground level and create areas of stronger winds","unverified","C124924016",123,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n122",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:123/3",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Proposition O growth scenario · finding: Similar impacts with smaller buildings, casting shorter shadows and intercepting less wind, of lesser magnitude","unverified","C124924016",123,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n122",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:123/4",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"C-3 growth scenario · finding: Microclimate impacts concentrated in an area already severely affected","unverified","C124924016",123,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n122",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:123/5",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Proposition O growth scenario · finding: Microclimate impacts dispersed into areas not now so affected","unverified","C124924016",123,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n122",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:127/1",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco C-3 and Proposition O growth scenarios · finding: Energy demands of each scenario will be approximately equal","unverified","C124924016",127,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n126",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:127/2",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Proposition O growth scenario, Downtown San Francisco · finding: More widespread development pattern with lower structures than C-3 scenario","unverified","C124924016",127,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n126",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:129/1",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown water system · finding: University Mound Reservoir serves most Downtown water needs; College Hill Reservoir serves a small portion","unverified","C124924016",129,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n128",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:135/1",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · other: 15 to 20 percent of Downtown revenues","unverified","C124924016",135,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n134",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:135/4",1979,1979,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown plan fiscal policy · recommendation: a new fiscal policy must be developed which accounts for all expected costs, allows for inflation","unverified","C124924016",135,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n134",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:139/1",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Industrial and commercial space dislocation, current C-3 zoning · other: 530,000 gross square feet dislocated","unverified","C124924016",139,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n138",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:139/2",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Industrial and commercial space dislocation, Proposition O amendments · other: 700,000 gross square feet dislocated","unverified","C124924016",139,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n138",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:139/3",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Employee displacement, current C-3 zoning regulations · other: 660 employees displaced","unverified","C124924016",139,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n138",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:139/4",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Employee displacement, Proposition O amendments · other: 875 employees displaced","unverified","C124924016",139,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n138",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:139/5",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Industrial and commercial dislocation, south of Market · other: greatest potential for industrial and commercial dislocation","unverified","C124924016",139,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n138",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:139/6",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Development pressure adjacent to C-3 zone · other: greater development pressure and increasing building space costs adjacent to the C-3 zone, particularly C-2 zones","unverified","C124924016",139,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n138",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:145/1",1979,1979,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown planning program · recommendation: continue the planning program launched in Phase I without delay","unverified","C124924016",145,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n144",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:145/2",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"interim controls on Downtown · other: many interim controls will expire in two years","unverified","C124924016",145,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n144",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:145/3",1979,1979,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan · recommendation: eliminate, to the extent legally possible, the need for environmental impact reports in Downtown","unverified","C124924016",145,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n144",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:147/1",1979,1979,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan · other: six major components","unverified","C124924016",147,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n146",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:153/1",1979,1979,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program · cost usd: duration of 18 months, including Phase 1","unverified","C124924016",153,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n152",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:153/2",1979,1979,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan Phase 3 plan adoption · other: Phase 3 will be accomplished largely by city staff, with some consulting assistance","unverified","C124924016",153,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n152",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:155/1",1979,1979,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan Phase 2, Task 2 Data Inventory and Analyses · other: 6-10 months","unverified","C124924016",155,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n154",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:163/1",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco interim controls · finding: interim controls are not a plan-based response to Downtown conservation and development issues","unverified","C124924016",163,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n162",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:163/2",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Proposition O interim controls · other: Proposition O limits interim controls to granting bonus FARs only in exchange for significant public benefits","unverified","C124924016",163,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n162",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:165/2",1979,1979,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Option 2: interim controls through discretionary review · alternative: Planning Commission can effect interim controls pursuant to discretionary review","unverified","C124924016",165,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n164",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:181/1",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco pedestrian environment · finding: Downtown pedestrian environment of plazas, open spaces, and streets with scale, variety, visual interest, and facade continuity, uniquely valuable","unverified","C124924016",181,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n180",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:181/2",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco pedestrian environment · finding: Downtown pedestrian environment is exceptionally vulnerable to new development impacts on microclimate, circulation, and human scale","unverified","C124924016",181,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n180",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:185/2",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown Conservation and Development Plan interim controls · other: interim controls protect the pedestrian environment of Downtown San Francisco during preparation of the plan","unverified","C124924016",185,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n184",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:193/2",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco architectural heritage · finding: no comprehensive plan for maintenance of the architectural and historic heritage of Downtown","unverified","C124924016",193,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n192",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:193/3",1979,1979,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Structures of Merit list · other: proposed list contains all type A and B buildings plus other structures of equal value outside the heritage survey scope","unverified","C124924016",193,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n192",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:197/5",1979,1979,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"C-3 district development · recommendation: All development shall be built to the street property line","unverified","C124924016",197,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n196",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:203/2",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown parking supply · finding: increasing parking supply would cause severe adverse impacts on environmental quality of the Downtown","unverified","C124924016",203,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n202",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:225/1",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown buildings · finding: designs have not responded well to the climate and rely on energy-intensive mechanical systems","unverified","C124924016",225,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n224",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:225/2",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown · finding: highest consumer of energy per square foot of developed land in the city","unverified","C124924016",225,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n224",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:25/6",1979,1979,"","project","study or report",null,"San Francisco Downtown Conservation and Development Plan · other: objective to manage Downtown growth and change","unverified","C124924016",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n24",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:31/1",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"Proposition O · alternative: zoning and code amendments contained in Proposition O","unverified","C124924016",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n30",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:31/2",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"Proposition O FAR limits · other: Office 14:1 Retail 10:1 General 8:1 Support 8:1 (as printed: Retail 10:])","unverified","C124924016",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n30",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:31/3",1979,1979,"","action","study or report",null,"Downtown Phase I work · other: assessment of four futures","unverified","C124924016",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n30",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:33/1",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"C-3 zone land capacity · other: approximately 168 acres or 7,317,000 square feet of available land","unverified","C124924016",33,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n32",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:37/1",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco C-3 zone land supply · other: Land supply figures are estimates and may increase or decrease with the real estate market","unverified","C124924016",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n36",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:37/2",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco C-3 zone land capacity · other: Total land supply 167.97 acres (147.08 acres supply)","unverified","C124924016",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n36",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:37/4",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco C-3 zone land supply · other: Land supply includes sites where buildings of historic or architectural merit may exist","unverified","C124924016",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n36",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:37/6",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco C-3 zone building space capacity · other: Phase I study estimated development capacity under two assumptions: current C-3 ordinance and Proposition O amendments","unverified","C124924016",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n36",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:41/1",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco development capacity · other: approximately 4.5 million square feet of building space under construction on 7.4 acres of land","unverified","C124924016",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n40",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:41/2",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco development capacity · other: almost 6.3 million square feet of floor space on 13.7 acres proposed","unverified","C124924016",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n40",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:41/4",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Proposition O effect on proposed projects · other: proposed projects would be allowed approximately 4 million square feet instead of 6.3 million","unverified","C124924016",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n40",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:41/6",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco total land supply · other: total land supply assumed approximately 168 acres; 33 additional acres within YBC project area","unverified","C124924016",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n40",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:41/7",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco C-3 zoning capacity · other: up to 95 million gross square feet under current C-3 zoning","unverified","C124924016",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n40",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:43/1",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown C-3 zoning district · floor area sqft: total building capacity 79,107,000 sq ft under current C-3 zoning, assuming base FAR","unverified","C124924016",43,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n42",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:43/2",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown C-3 zoning district · floor area sqft: total building capacity 95,004,000 sq ft under current C-3 zoning, assuming use of bonus features for FAR","unverified","C124924016",43,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n42",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:45/1",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"Proposition O · other: base FAR 8:1 for C-3-O, 7:1 for C-3-R, 5:1 for C-3-G and C-3-S","unverified","C124924016",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n44",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:45/2",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"Proposition O · other: bonus FARs represent the mid-range between the base and maximum FARs proposed in Proposition O","unverified","C124924016",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n44",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:53/3",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"Current C-3 zoning development scenario · other: Approximately 6.34 million sq ft of building space with filed permit applications included in Near-Term allocation","unverified","C124924016",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n52",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:53/4",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"Current C-3 zoning development scenario · other: Approximately 4.53 million sq ft under construction, not included in allocation chart","unverified","C124924016",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n52",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:57/1",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"Proposition O zoning development scenario, downtown growth allocation · other: Approximately 4 million square feet of building space included in Near-Term allocation","unverified","C124924016",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n56",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:57/2",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Proposition O zoning development scenario, downtown growth allocation · other: Approximately 4.53 million square feet now under construction not included in allocation chart","unverified","C124924016",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n56",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:61/1",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · finding: sufficient buildable sites available in Downtown to accommodate estimated long-term growth","unverified","C124924016",61,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n60",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:61/2",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"Proposition O · other: consume 3! percent more land for new development than the C-3 scenario","unverified","C124924016",61,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n60",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:65/2",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"C-3 land supply, subarea 1, Prop O scenario · acreage: Subarea 1 supply 25.60 acres; near-term 10.97 acres (42.9%); long-term 11.41 acres (44.6%); total absorbed 22.30 acres (87.4%)","unverified","C124924016",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n64",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:65/3",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"C-3 land supply, subarea 2, Prop O scenario · acreage: Subarea 2 supply 17.07 acres; near-term 9.60 acres (56.2%)","unverified","C124924016",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n64",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:7/3",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco commuter movement · finding: Commuter movement will increase by 25 percent near-term and 60 percent long-term","unverified","C124924016",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n6",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:71/1",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown traffic and transit systems · finding: severe congestion now occurs frequently on most parts of the traffic and transit systems","unverified","C124924016",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n70",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:71/3",1979,1979,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown office space under construction · floor area sqft: 4.53 million square feet of office space under construction","unverified","C124924016",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n70",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:73/1",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco development and transportation · finding: approximately 6.3 million square feet approved or submitted for approval","unverified","C124924016",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n72",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:73/5",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco transit requirements · finding: transportation requirements of long-term development could be met through substantial transit improvements","unverified","C124924016",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n72",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:81/1",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"C-3 regulations · height ft: up to 700 feet (about 50 stories) in the office district","unverified","C124924016",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n80",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:81/2",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"Proposition O · height ft: maximum height limit of 260 feet (about 20 stories)","unverified","C124924016",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n80",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:85/1",1979,1979,"","site","study or report",null,"Retail District, Downtown San Francisco · other: View of retail district from Telegraph Hill looking south; Bank of America at left","unverified","C124924016",85,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n84",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:91/1",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown open space · finding: Downtown appears to lack open space despite the amount available","unverified","C124924016",91,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n90",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:91/2",1979,1979,"","site","study or report",null,"Union Square, Civic Center and United Nations plazas · other: major public open spaces in Downtown","unverified","C124924016",91,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n90",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924113:2/2",1979,1979,"","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco Conservation and Development Planning Program Phase 1 study area · other: Financial District, Union Square, Tenderloin, Civic Center and South of Market areas","unverified","C124924113",2,"https://archive.org/details/C124924113/page/n1",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : Phase 1 study : summary","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924113:2/3",1979,1979,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco final plan · other: approximately fifteen months to complete","unverified","C124924113",2,"https://archive.org/details/C124924113/page/n1",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : Phase 1 study : summary","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924113:2/4",1979,1979,"","project","study or report",null,"Master Environmental Assessment for Downtown · other: to be included in the Downtown plan as a basis for evaluating future developments","unverified","C124924113",2,"https://archive.org/details/C124924113/page/n1",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : Phase 1 study : summary","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924113:3/4",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco historic buildings · finding: about 15 percent of historic and architecturally significant buildings would be demolished under current regulations","unverified","C124924113",3,"https://archive.org/details/C124924113/page/n2",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : Phase 1 study : summary","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924113:3/5",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · finding: incremental costs could exceed incremental revenues by as much as 25 percent","unverified","C124924113",3,"https://archive.org/details/C124924113/page/n2",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : Phase 1 study : summary","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924113:3/7",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · finding: Market Street plazas and major retail streets would be darkened and made windier by taller buildings","unverified","C124924113",3,"https://archive.org/details/C124924113/page/n2","Market Street",null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : Phase 1 study : summary","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924113:4/1",1979,1979,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan (San Francisco Downtown Conservation and Development Plan) · proposes: Phase 1 reconnaissance and programming identifying critical growth constraints","unverified","C124924113",4,"https://archive.org/details/C124924113/page/n3",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : Phase 1 study : summary","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924113:4/2",1979,1979,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan Phase 2 · proposes: Preparation of Final Downtown Plan, implementation program and environmental impact report","unverified","C124924113",4,"https://archive.org/details/C124924113/page/n3",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : Phase 1 study : summary","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924113:4/4",1979,1979,"","event","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan Phase 3 · event: Approval of Plan by City Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors","unverified","C124924113",4,"https://archive.org/details/C124924113/page/n3",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : Phase 1 study : summary","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:33/1",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown landmark buildings · finding: no official city designated landmark has ever been demolished","unverified","C124924423",33,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n32",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:33/2",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown older buildings · finding: a number of buildings listed on the surveys have been demolished or are threatened by demolition","unverified","C124924423",33,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n32",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:33/5",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"SPUR Highrise Study · finding: high rise buildings per se are not the problem; they obstruct some views but have created new ones, for an overall net gain","unverified","C124924423",33,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n32",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:35/2",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"SPUR [name withheld] · finding: Location and size of surrounding buildings are equally important to wind velocity at a building's base","unverified","C124924423",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n34",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:35/3",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"101 California [name withheld] EIR · finding: Wind patterns and pressures around structures can be predicted by testing scale models in a wind tunnel","unverified","C124924423",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n34",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:35/4",1979,1979,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown high rise buildings · recommendation: Buildings should be designed to minimize their effect on wind velocity","unverified","C124924423",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n34",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:35/5",1979,1979,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown pedestrian environment · recommendation: Establish guidelines to improve the design treatment of the lower floors of buildings","unverified","C124924423",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n34",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:45/4",1979,1979,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown floor area ratio controls · recommendation: establish a maximum floor area ratio","unverified","C124924423",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n44",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:55/4",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"C-3-O use district · other: maximum height 260 feet","unverified","C124924423",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n54",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:57/1",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown office space · floor area sqft: around 55 million square feet","unverified","C124924423",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n56",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:57/5",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Initiative basic floor area ratio 8:1 · floor area sqft: only 15 million square feet could be built","unverified","C124924423",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n56",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:57/6",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown growth under the initiative and present zoning · acreage: 86-126 acres under the initiative; 49-72 acres under present zoning","unverified","C124924423",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n56",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:57/7",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown traffic and transit under the initiative · finding: traffic and transit congestion would continue to increase","unverified","C124924423",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n56",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:59/1",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown C-3 districts total · floor area sqft: 123,275,000 basic; 201,645,000 maximum","unverified","C124924423",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n58",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:59/8",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"Current growth rates projection · other: downtown office space projection 89 million to 100 million sq.ft.","unverified","C124924423",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n58",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:63/1",1979,1979,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"700-foot height district · height ft: change to around 575 feet","unverified","C124924423",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n62",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:63/2",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"700-foot height district · finding: excessive considering location and height of existing buildings","unverified","C124924423",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n62",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:69/1",1979,1979,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown building towers · recommendation: Building setbacks required above 150 feet in height","unverified","C124924423",69,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n68",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:69/2",1979,1979,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown building towers side setback · recommendation: One setback of 15 feet increasing in proportion to lot width, up to 25 feet, for lots 75-100 feet wide","unverified","C124924423",69,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n68",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:69/3",1979,1979,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown building towers side setback · recommendation: One setback of 25 feet plus 1 foot per 2.5 feet of lot width over 100 feet, for lots wider than 100 feet","unverified","C124924423",69,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n68",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:69/4",1979,1979,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Low Coverage at Upper Floors development bonus · recommendation: Maximum bonus of 100,000 square feet for tall, slim buildings","unverified","C124924423",69,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n68",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:69/5",1979,1979,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Low Coverage at Upper Floors development bonus · recommendation: Building dimensions reduced 2.5 feet combined for each 70 feet of building height","unverified","C124924423",69,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n68",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:69/6",1979,1979,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Low Coverage at Upper Floors development bonus · recommendation: Bulk reduction starts at 60 feet height unless street width is less than 60 feet","unverified","C124924423",69,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n68",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:71/1",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown plaza standards · other: Plaza must be in sunlight 75 percent of the time from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. May 1 to October 30 for bonus","unverified","C124924423",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n70",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:71/2",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown plaza standards · other: Plaza not subject to wind velocities exceeding 50 mph more than 0.01 percent of the time or 35 mph more than 0.1 percent of the time","unverified","C124924423",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n70",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:71/3",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown plaza standards · other: At least 20 percent of plaza surface must be landscaped with plant materials","unverified","C124924423",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n70",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:71/4",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown plaza standards · other: Floor area bonus of 10 square feet for each square foot of plaza, up to the maximum allowed for plazas","unverified","C124924423",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n70",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:71/5",1979,1979,"","measure","study or report",null,"Preservation of landmark buildings · other: Additional floor area bonus granted for designated 'A' buildings (New)","unverified","C124924423",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n70",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:81/2",1979,1979,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown Transportation Improvement Assessment District · recommendation: Staff support should be provided through the Chamber of Commerce","unverified","C124924423",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n80",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:81/3",1979,1979,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown Transportation Improvement Assessment District · recommendation: A list of eligible projects and an assessment formula should be developed annually by the Board","unverified","C124924423",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n80",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:81/5",1979,1979,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown transit · recommendation: Support purchase and use of high capacity articulated buses for San Francisco Municipal Railway","unverified","C124924423",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n80",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:85/1",1987,1979,"1979","event","study or report",null,"Splendid Survivors inventory of downtown significant buildings · proposes: Landmarks Board and Planning Department proposed use of Sec. 1011 in 1979 to authorize adoption of the downtown inventory","unverified","C124889732",85,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n84",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:85/2",1987,1979,"1979","finding","study or report",null,"Structures of merit list (Sec. 1011) · adopted: Planning Commission adopted lists by resolution rather than as Structures of Merit after opposition at public hearings","unverified","C124889732",85,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n84",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906311:40/2",1977,1979,"1979","project","study or report",null,"MUNI Metro · other: subsurface light rail line, service scheduled to begin","unverified","C124906311",40,"https://archive.org/details/C124906311/page/n39",null,null,null,"A description of BART : its facilities, service and surroundings","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:113/1",1979,1979,"1979","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan landmark buildings · recommendation: Downtown Plan must contain workable methods for safeguarding landmark buildings","unverified","C124924016",113,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n112",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:119/1",1979,1979,"1979","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan · other: Downtown housing roles and programs to be resolved by the Downtown Plan","unverified","C124924016",119,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n118",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:49/1",1979,1979,"1979","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown tourist hotels · other: approximately 15,600 tourist hotel rooms estimated","unverified","C124924016",49,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n48",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:69/1",1979,1979,"1979","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan · finding: Downtown Plan must provide a more complete analysis of land supply and development capacity","unverified","C124924016",69,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n68",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:79/1",1979,1979,"1979","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · other: physical appearance regulated by current C-3 zoning regulations and Proposition O","unverified","C124924016",79,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n78",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924113:1/2",1979,1979,"1979","project","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco Conservation and Development Planning Program - Phase 1 · proposes: A scope of work for the remaining phases of the Downtown program","unverified","C124924113",1,"https://archive.org/details/C124924113/page/n0",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : Phase 1 study : summary","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924113:1/3",1979,1979,"1979","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco Conservation and Development Planning Program - Phase 1 · recommendation: Suggests temporary controls to guide development while the Downtown Plan and final legislative amendments are pursued","unverified","C124924113",1,"https://archive.org/details/C124924113/page/n0",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : Phase 1 study : summary","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:21/1",1979,1979,"1979","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco office space · floor area sqft: approximately 55 million gross square feet","unverified","C124924423",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n20",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:67/5",1979,1979,"1979","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown development bonuses · recommendation: development bonuses should not increase basic FAR by more than 50 percent","unverified","C124924423",67,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n66",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:75/1",1979,1979,"1979","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown building design · recommendation: Blank walls limited to no more than 40 percent of building frontage and not continuous for more than 25 feet","unverified","C124924423",75,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n74",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:75/2",1979,1979,"1979","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown sidewalk widening · recommendation: Minimum sidewalk width 10 feet for buildings of 400,000 square feet or less","unverified","C124924423",75,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n74",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:75/3",1979,1979,"1979","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown sidewalk widening · recommendation: Minimum sidewalk width 15 feet for buildings of 400,000 to 800,000 square feet","unverified","C124924423",75,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n74",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:75/4",1979,1979,"1979","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown sidewalk widening · recommendation: Minimum sidewalk width 20 feet for buildings of 800,000 square feet or more","unverified","C124924423",75,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n74",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:75/5",1979,1979,"1979","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown views and view corridors · recommendation: Views should be protected by building setbacks and lower coverage of upper floors","unverified","C124924423",75,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n74",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:75/6",1979,1979,"1979","finding","study or report",null,"Landmark buildings downtown · finding: Continued growth downtown will eventually lead to irreplaceable loss of remaining landmark quality buildings","unverified","C124924423",75,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n74",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:79/1",1979,1979,"1979","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown growth management program design review · recommendation: Design review process limited to siting, orientation and facade treatment of new buildings","unverified","C124924423",79,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n78",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:79/2",1979,1979,"1979","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown design review · recommendation: A time limit of 120 days for completion of design review and environmental review","unverified","C124924423",79,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n78",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:79/3",1979,1979,"1979","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown design review · recommendation: Time limit of 2-3 weeks on approval of final plans","unverified","C124924423",79,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n78",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:79/4",1979,1979,"1979","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown Transportation Systems Management program · recommendation: Develop downtown TSM program for major employers and office buildings through the Chamber of Commerce","unverified","C124924423",79,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n78",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:79/5",1979,1979,"1979","recommendation","study or report",null,"Transportation Improvement Assessment District · recommendation: Assessment district recommended to help finance needed transportation improvements","unverified","C124924423",79,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n78",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:154/10007",1983,1979,"1979","event","study or report",null,"Splendid Survivors survey · event: Architectural and historical survey of a portion of the C-3 Use District conducted by Charles Hall Page & Associates","unverified","c124896626",154,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n153",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:7/1",1979,1979,"1979-10-08","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco Conservation and Development Plan Phase I · finding: Same overall amount of growth could be accommodated under C-3 and Proposition O futures","unverified","C124924016",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n6",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:7/2",1979,1979,"1979-10-08","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco Conservation and Development Plan Phase I · finding: New Downtown growth, particularly under Proposition O, will directly displace many low- and moderate-income residents","unverified","C124924016",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n6",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:7/5",1979,1979,"1979-10-08","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown historic structures · finding: Historic structures will continue to be imperiled under both growth scenarios; larger prominent structures more severely threatened under C-3","unverified","C124924016",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n6",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:7/6",1979,1979,"1979-10-08","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco Conservation and Development Plan · recommendation: Proposes interim controls while the plan is being prepared","unverified","C124924016",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n6",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:125/2",1979,1979,"1979-1985","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco peak 8-hour street traffic · other: average peak 8-hour speeds drop from 13 mph to 8 mph","unverified","C124924016",125,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n124",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:125/4",1979,1979,"1979-2000","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco street emissions · other: total emissions increase 48 percent between 1979 and 2000 despite 62 percent lower per-mile auto emission rate","unverified","C124924016",125,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n124",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924113:3/1",1979,1979,"1979-2000","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · finding: about 50 million square feet of additional building space projected 1979-2000","unverified","C124924113",3,"https://archive.org/details/C124924113/page/n2",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : Phase 1 study : summary","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:35/1",1979,1979,"July 1971","finding","study or report",null,"McCue Report (Tall Buildings and San Francisco) · finding: Buildings of about eight stories built to lot lines along an entire block will completely shade an east-west street most of the day","unverified","C124924423",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n34",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924113:4/5",1979,1979,"November 1979","event","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan Phase 1 report · event: Summary prepared for Department of City Planning by Sedway/Cooke, November 1979","unverified","C124924113",4,"https://archive.org/details/C124924113/page/n3",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : Phase 1 study : summary","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:3/1",1979,1979,"October 1979","project","study or report",null,"Downtown Growth Management Program · sponsor: San Francisco Chamber of Commerce","unverified","C124924423",3,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n2",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:3/2",1979,1979,"October 1979","project","study or report",null,"Downtown Growth Management Program · architect: Bolles Associates and Livingston & Associates","unverified","C124924423",3,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n2",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:9/2",1979,1979,"October 8, 1979","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco development · finding: incremental costs likely exceed incremental revenues by as much as 25 percent","unverified","C124924016",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n8",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:9/3",1979,1979,"October 8, 1979","measure","study or report",null,"Interim controls for Downtown · other: prohibit demolition or alteration of notable historic structures","unverified","C124924016",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n8",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:21/2",1979,1979,"by 1983","project","study or report",null,"Planned downtown office construction · floor area sqft: 5.6 million square feet by 1983","unverified","C124924423",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n20",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:121/1",1979,1979,"by the year 1985","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco traffic noise · finding: short-term increase in traffic volume of approximately 15-20 percent under either growth scenario","unverified","C124924016",121,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n120",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:121/2",1979,1979,"by the year 2000","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco traffic noise · finding: traffic volumes increase approximately 50-60 percent under either growth scenario","unverified","C124924016",121,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n120",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:121/3",1979,1979,"by the year 2000","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco traffic noise · finding: 1-2 decibel (dBA) increase in overall environmental noise level","unverified","C124924016",121,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n120",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924113:1/1",1979,1979,"early October, 1979","event","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco Conservation and Development Planning Program - Phase 1 · event: Report submitted by Sedway/Cooke to the San Francisco Department of City Planning","unverified","C124924113",1,"https://archive.org/details/C124924113/page/n0",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : Phase 1 study : summary","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:33/4",1979,1979,"forthcoming","project","study or report",null,"Splendid Survivors: San Francisco's Downtown Architectural Heritage · other: comprehensive study of downtown buildings, forthcoming publication by Foundation for San Francisco's Architectural Heritage","unverified","C124924423",33,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n32",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:59/2",1979,1979,"long-term","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown C-3 development capacity · other: 48.7 percent of development capacity absorbed under continuation of current C-3 zoning","unverified","C124924016",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n58",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:59/3",1979,1979,"long-term","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown C-3 development capacity · other: 78.4 percent of development capacity absorbed under Proposition O provisions","unverified","C124924016",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n58",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:45/1",1979,1979,"since 1945","property_record","study or report",null,"Downtown buildings constructed since 1945 · other: 13% have floor area ratios greater than 18:1","unverified","C124924423",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n44",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:21/7",1979,1979,"since 1970","building","study or report",null,"Office buildings constructed since 1970 · stories: average 30 stories","unverified","C124924423",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n20",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:21/8",1979,1979,"since 1970","building","study or report",null,"Office buildings constructed since 1970 · floor area sqft: average 679,000 gross square feet","unverified","C124924423",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n20",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:193/1",1979,1979,"since World War II","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco architectural heritage · finding: architectural cohesion gradually disappearing since World War II as buildings are demolished or altered","unverified","C124924016",193,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n192",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:59/1",1985,1980,"1980","finding","study or report",null,"HSWT commuters to downtown San Francisco · other: 10,144 commuters in 1980","unverified","C123305299",59,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n58",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902184:48/5",1987,1980,"1980","finding","study or report",null,"Residents of South Bayshore who work in Downtown San Francisco · other: Downtown San Francisco 35.7%","unverified","C124902184",48,"https://archive.org/details/C124902184/page/n47",null,null,null,"Issues report for the South Bayshore Study Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:44/1",1977,1980,"1980","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco major office buildings · other: 13 major office buildings under construction or proposed for completion by 1980","unverified","C124906302",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n43",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906302:44/2",1977,1980,"1980","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco major office buildings · other: Seven million gross square feet to be added to downtown office inventory","unverified","C124906302",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124906302/page/n43",null,null,null,"Indirect environmental impacts : technical memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:75/1",1983,1980,"1980-06-09","alternative","study or report",null,"SFRG Notices of Intent alternative · proposes: five Notices of Intent published June 9, 1980, to be evaluated as an alternative in the Downtown EIR","unverified","c124896626",75,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n74",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:91/4",1983,1980,"1980-1984","project","study or report",null,"Downtown office space completed 1980-1984 · other: 10 million square feet of additional office space completed","unverified","c124896626",91,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n90",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123306725:21/1",1981,1981,"","measure","study or report",null,"Transit assessment district · proposes: special recurring charge on commercial downtown property","unverified","C123306725",21,"https://archive.org/details/C123306725/page/n20",null,null,null,"Comparative study of taxes and other charges paid by business in San Francisco and other areas : summary","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123306725:21/2",1981,1981,"","measure","study or report",null,"Transit assessment district · other: assumed 50¢ per square foot levy","unverified","C123306725",21,"https://archive.org/details/C123306725/page/n20",null,null,null,"Comparative study of taxes and other charges paid by business in San Francisco and other areas : summary","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123306725:25/2",1981,1981,"","measure","study or report",null,"Transit assessment district · proposes: special recurring charge of 50¢ per square foot levy on commercial downtown property","unverified","C123306725",25,"https://archive.org/details/C123306725/page/n24",null,null,null,"Comparative study of taxes and other charges paid by business in San Francisco and other areas : summary","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123306725:25/3",1981,1981,"","measure","study or report",null,"Transit assessment district, sample downtown office · cost usd: 552,900 per year, or $117 per employee","unverified","C123306725",25,"https://archive.org/details/C123306725/page/n24",null,null,null,"Comparative study of taxes and other charges paid by business in San Francisco and other areas : summary","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:26/5",1985,1981,"1981","event","study or report",null,"Larkspur Ferry · event: daily round trips cut from nine to three to reduce operating costs, patronage began to fall","unverified","C123305299",26,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n25",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124918135:29/3",1995,1981,"1981","event","study or report",null,"Downtown transit assessment district · other: Board of Supervisors commissioned studies to determine value of MUNI benefit to downtown property owners","unverified","C124918135",29,"https://archive.org/details/C124918135/page/n28",null,null,null,"Analysis of potential dedicated funding sources for the Municipal Railway (MUNI) : report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors","n","a",0,-3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124918135:29/5",1995,1981,"1981","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown transit assessment district · other: Board of Supervisors did not set up a transit assessment district","unverified","C124918135",29,"https://archive.org/details/C124918135/page/n28",null,null,null,"Analysis of potential dedicated funding sources for the Municipal Railway (MUNI) : report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors","n","a",0,-3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124918135:31/2",1995,1981,"1981","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown net deficit · cost usd: $20,780,000","unverified","C124918135",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124918135/page/n30",null,null,null,"Analysis of potential dedicated funding sources for the Municipal Railway (MUNI) : report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:324/1",1983,1981,"1981","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco (C-3 District) construction employment · other: Another 20 percent of construction employment is estimated to be in the C-3 District while projects are under construction","unverified","c124896626",324,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n323",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:272/1",1983,1981,"1981 to 1984","finding","study or report",null,"New office buildings, 1981 to 1984 · floor area sqft: about 404,000 gross sq. ft. of retail space in new office buildings","unverified","c124896626",272,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n271",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:272/10001",1983,1981,"1981 to 1984","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · other: Retail space in new office buildings about 404,000 gross sq. ft., about 5.4 percent of new office space, 1981-1984","unverified","c124896626",272,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n271",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:272/10002",1983,1981,"1981 to 1984","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · other: Branch bank space assumed in office projects, about two percent of total new office space built, 1981-1984","unverified","c124896626",272,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n271",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:272/2",1983,1981,"1981 to 1984","finding","study or report",null,"New office buildings, 1981 to 1984 · other: branch bank space assumed in office projects, equal to about two percent of the total new office space built","unverified","c124896626",272,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n271",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:273/3",1983,1981,"1981 to 1990","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · other: Overall, five percent of total space in new office buildings assumed retail for balance of pipeline projects","unverified","c124896626",273,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n272",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:351/10001",1983,1981,"1981 to 2000","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · other: Employment densities in occupied space assumed constant from 1981 to 2000 under Alternative 1","unverified","c124896626",351,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n350",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:351/10002",1983,1981,"1981 to 2000","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · other: Employment densities assumed to increase by five percent in all business activities under Alternatives 4 and 5","unverified","c124896626",351,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n350",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:352/6",1983,1981,"1981 to 2000","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · other: Retail sales forecast in C-3 District depends on office employment growth and tourist spending growth, 1981 to 2000","unverified","c124896626",352,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n351",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljulydecofproceed76sanfrich:89/3",1981,1981,"1981-07-27","resolution","transit","passed","Golden Gate Bridge district's proposed bus routes to Daly City BART and downtown San Francisco were endorsed by resolution.","quoted","journaljulydecofproceed76sanfrich",89,"https://archive.org/details/journaljulydecofproceed76sanfrich/page/n88",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.53],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:75/2",1983,1981,"1981-09-23","alternative","study or report",null,"Housing Requirement NOI · other: one requested revision to the specific content of the Housing Requirement Notice of Intent (item 14)","unverified","c124896626",75,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n74",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:31/1",1995,1981,"1981-1993","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown transit ridership and capacity tables · other: Muni ridership figures for 1981 and 1985 not directly comparable to 1989 and 1993 figures, due to methodological differences","unverified","C124914193",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n31",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:7/4",1995,1981,"1981-1993","finding","study or report",null,"Transbay area plan background data report · other: Table 5: Downtown Transit Ridership and Capacity: 1981, 1985, 1989 and 1993","unverified","C124914193",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n7",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:287/1",1983,1981,"1981-2000","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco supplemental tables · other: Tables G.12-G.19 show distribution of space by use and subarea for 1981, 1984, 1990 and five Alternatives for 2000","unverified","c124896626",287,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n286",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:287/2",1983,1981,"1981-2000","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco supplemental tables · other: Tables show all land use information in the C-3 District from 1981-2000 for all Alternatives","unverified","c124896626",287,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n286",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123304912:45/1",1982,1982,"","site","study or report",null,"Transbay Terminal · other: AC ticket booth where joint AC-Muni passes are sold","unverified","C123304912",45,"https://archive.org/details/C123304912/page/n44",null,null,null,"Final report on the Joint Fare Prepayment Demonstration Design Project","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123304912:79/1",1982,1982,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Joint Fare Prepayment Demonstration · proposes: Traffic could be excluded from downtown San Francisco if schedules increase and pass prices fall","unverified","C123304912",79,"https://archive.org/details/C123304912/page/n78",null,null,null,"Final report on the Joint Fare Prepayment Demonstration Design Project","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123304912:8/1",1982,1982,"","agency","study or report",null,"Golden Gate Transit · other: limited ferry boat service from Marin County terminals to the foot of Market Street","unverified","C123304912",8,"https://archive.org/details/C123304912/page/n7","Market Street",null,null,"Final report on the Joint Fare Prepayment Demonstration Design Project","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123304912:8/2",1982,1982,"","agency","study or report",null,"Golden Gate Transit · other: bus service across the Golden Gate Bridge to downtown San Francisco","unverified","C123304912",8,"https://archive.org/details/C123304912/page/n7",null,null,null,"Final report on the Joint Fare Prepayment Demonstration Design Project","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123304912:8/3",1982,1982,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Mateo County Transit (SamTrans) · other: bus service into downtown San Francisco","unverified","C123304912",8,"https://archive.org/details/C123304912/page/n7",null,null,null,"Final report on the Joint Fare Prepayment Demonstration Design Project","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123304912:9/1",1982,1982,"","site","study or report",null,"Transbay Terminal · other: terminus of AC Transit routes across the Bay Bridge, on the edge of downtown San Francisco","unverified","C123304912",9,"https://archive.org/details/C123304912/page/n8",null,null,null,"Final report on the Joint Fare Prepayment Demonstration Design Project","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124884121:13/4",1982,1982,"","measure","study or report",null,"Value-based regional joint monthly pass · cost usd: $1.25 fare for AC transbay trips from Zone 2 to downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124884121",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124884121/page/n12",null,null,null,"Final report on the Joint Fare Prepayment Demonstration Design Project","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124884121:25/1",1982,1982,"","site","study or report",null,"Transbay Terminal · other: AC Transit runs several routes across the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge to the Transbay Terminal","unverified","C124884121",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124884121/page/n24",null,null,null,"Final report on the Joint Fare Prepayment Demonstration Design Project","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124895686:62/5",1982,1982,"","site","study or report",null,"Samtrans 5M Route · other: closed-door service on Mission Street","unverified","C124895686",62,"https://archive.org/details/C124895686/page/n61","Mission Street",null,null,"Muni J Line connection project, San Francisco, California : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124884121:27/1",1982,1982,"1982","site","study or report",null,"Golden Gate Transit · other: Bus service across the Golden Gate Bridge to downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124884121",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124884121/page/n26",null,null,null,"Final report on the Joint Fare Prepayment Demonstration Design Project","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:229/2",1983,1982,"1982","finding","study or report",null,"Prior downtown office and hotel surveys · finding: Prior surveys were not weighted to account for differential response rates and differences may arise from survey methodology rather than changes over time","unverified","c124896626",229,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n228",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:145/1",1983,1982,"1982","finding","plan",null,"S.F. streets (cordon line at Van Ness Avenue, Central Skyway, and Townsend Street) · finding: considerable congestion on city streets from autos using downtown parking","unverified","c124897620",145,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n144",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:145/2",1983,1982,"1982","finding","plan",null,"Downtown intersections, afternoon peak · finding: queues and levels of service shown at various intersections, 4 to 6 p.m. peak","unverified","c124897620",145,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n144",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:35/1",1983,1982,"1982","finding","plan",null,"Downtown retail sales · other: downtown sales receipts estimated at $1.3 billion in 1982","unverified","c124897620",35,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n34",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:101/1",1983,1983,"","measure","study or report",null,"downtown bulk controls · other: Bulk limits by tower zone (lower, mid, upper) with maximum width and maximum plan dimension; printed figures include 180 ft max width and 250 ft and 220 ft max plan dimension","unverified","c124896626",101,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n100",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:103/1",1983,1983,"","building","study or report",null,"downtown tower bulk envelope · height ft: 400 foot tower under proposed bulk controls","unverified","c124896626",103,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n102",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:103/2",1983,1983,"","measure","study or report",null,"sunlight access angles · proposes: parcels adjacent to streets shown on Map 3 required to respect sunlight access angles above a certain street wall height","unverified","c124896626",103,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n102",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:104/1",1983,1983,"","site","study or report",null,"[name withheld] [name withheld] area · other: Sunlight access map showing streets Belden, Leidesdorff, Ellis, O'Farrell, Geary, Post, Sutter with projected sidewalks","unverified","c124896626",104,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n103","Belden Street; Leidesdorff Street; Ellis Street; O'Farrell Street; Geary Street; Post Street; Sutter Street",null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-5.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:106/1",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Planning Code height limit exceptions for roof tops · proposes: Allow mechanical equipment, decorative roof construction, penthouse space and/or recreation and open space above the height limit, within planes sloping inward at 50°","unverified","c124896626",106,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n105",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:106/2",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Planning Code architectural projections · proposes: Allow architectural features to project up to one foot, not below 7 1/2 feet above sidewalk grade","unverified","c124896626",106,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n105",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:107/1",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Incorporate Art Works In or Near New Buildings · proposes: 1% of the total construction cost of the project invested in art works","unverified","c124896626",107,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n106",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:107/2",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Strengthen Urban Design Standards · proposes: Downtown Urban Design section of the Urban Design Element of the Master Plan","unverified","c124896626",107,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n106",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:112/1",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco transportation policy · recommendation: Restrict additional commuter parking to trips that cannot reasonably be made by transit","unverified","c124896626",112,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n111",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:112/2",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco development approvals · recommendation: Approval of all new downtown development subject to transportation conditions","unverified","c124896626",112,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n111",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:115/1",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown office development housing requirement · proposes: Housing required in proportion to office space as condition of approval for projects over 50,000 sq ft of office","unverified","c124896626",115,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n114",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:115/2",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown office development housing requirement · units: 640 sq ft of housing for every 1,000 sq ft of office space","unverified","c124896626",115,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n114",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:115/3",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown office development housing requirement · other: Average gross office space per employee assumed at 250 sq ft","unverified","c124896626",115,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n114",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:115/4",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown office development housing requirement · other: 40% of office employees assumed to live in San Francisco","unverified","c124896626",115,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n114",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:115/5",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown office development housing requirement · other: Average gross residential space per person assumed at 400 sq ft","unverified","c124896626",115,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n114",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:115/6",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown office development housing requirement · units: Approximately .9 units per 1,000 sq ft of office space","unverified","c124896626",115,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n114",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:119/2",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Significant buildings list additions · proposes: Buildings rated A and B by Heritage in its expanded survey as likely candidates for addition to the list","unverified","c124896626",119,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n118",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:119/3",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Significant downtown buildings retention FAR allowance · proposes: Exclude from FAR up to the full gross floor area of public-use space and up to 50% of private-use space","unverified","c124896626",119,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n118",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:131/2",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Prototypical office FAR, Alternative 3, C-3-O use district · other: 12.0 to 1","unverified","c124896626",131,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n130",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:134/1",1983,1983,"","building","study or report",null,"Alternative 1 Building [name withheld] · height ft: Height District 700-1 (600-1, 500-1 and 450-1 similar)","unverified","c124896626",134,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n133",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:138/1",1983,1983,"","building","study or report",null,"Alternative 2 Building [name withheld] · other: Zoning District C-3-O","unverified","c124896626",138,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n137",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:138/2",1983,1983,"","building","study or report",null,"Alternative 2 Building [name withheld] · height ft: Height District 675-1 (600-1, 450-1 and 400-1 similar)","unverified","c124896626",138,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n137",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:142/1",1983,1983,"","building","study or report",null,"Alternative 3 Building [name withheld] · height ft: 260-1 height district (C-3-O zoning)","unverified","c124896626",142,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n141",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:146/1",1983,1983,"","building","study or report",null,"Alternative 4 building prototype · height ft: Height District 575-I","unverified","c124896626",146,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n145",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:146/2",1983,1983,"","building","study or report",null,"Alternative 4 building prototype · other: Zoning District C-3-O","unverified","c124896626",146,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n145",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:150/1",1983,1983,"","building","study or report",null,"Alternative 5 building prototype · other: Zoning District C-3-O","unverified","c124896626",150,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n149",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:150/2",1983,1983,"","building","study or report",null,"Alternative 5 building prototype · height ft: Height District 700-S","unverified","c124896626",150,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n149",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:155/1",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Splendid Survivors survey ratings · finding: Summary ratings A through D; A is Highest Importance, eligible for National Register and highest priority for City Landmark status","unverified","c124896626",155,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n154",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:155/2",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Splendid Survivors survey ratings · finding: B-group buildings are of major importance and considered eligible for listing on the National Register","unverified","c124896626",155,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n154",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:155/3",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Splendid Survivors survey ratings · finding: C-group buildings are contextual importance; many may be eligible for National Register as part of historic districts","unverified","c124896626",155,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n154",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:155/4",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Splendid Survivors survey ratings · finding: D-group buildings are of minor or no importance","unverified","c124896626",155,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n154",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:198/1",1983,1983,"","site","study or report",null,"Downtown EIR subarea designated architectural resources (Map 9, Figure E.10) · other: Designated architectural resources shown on Map 9, with City Landmark and Heritage A/B/C ratings, in downtown EIR subarea","unverified","c124896626",198,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n197",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:21/4",1983,1983,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Alternative 2: Proposition O initiative ordinance · finding: Reduction of height and Floor Area Ratios; C-3-O maximum height 260 ft, maximum FAR 14","unverified","c124896626",21,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n20",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:21/7",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Sedway-Cooke study · other: Subset of Proposition O; only elements more restrictive than Proposition O analyzed","unverified","c124896626",21,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n20",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:22/2",1983,1983,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Fair Taxation Initiative · proposes: Institution of an annual limit on office development of one million square feet","unverified","c124896626",22,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n21",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:22/6",1983,1983,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Fair Taxation Initiative · proposes: Prohibition against downtown development if public costs exceed tax revenues until cost/revenue balance is restored","unverified","c124896626",22,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n21",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:237/1",1983,1983,"","measure","study or report",null,"Real estate feasibility model, downtown office buildings · other: capitalization rate 9% in Subarea 1; 10% in all other subareas; subarea 3 value printed as 113 (OCR), likely 13%","unverified","c124896626",237,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n236",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:237/2",1983,1983,"","measure","study or report",null,"Real estate feasibility model, downtown office buildings · other: occupancy rate assumption 95 percent","unverified","c124896626",237,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n236",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:237/3",1983,1983,"","measure","study or report",null,"Real estate feasibility model, downtown office buildings · other: operating expenses assumption $6.00 per sq. ft. per year","unverified","c124896626",237,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n236",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:237/4",1983,1983,"","measure","study or report",null,"Real estate feasibility model, downtown office buildings · other: net area ratio assumption 0.9 (rentable to gross building area)","unverified","c124896626",237,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n236",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:24/1",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown growth management alternatives EIR · finding: EIR needed covering possible impacts in land use, urban design, historic buildings, community services, employment and housing, transportation, noise, air quality and energy","unverified","c124896626",24,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n23",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:240/1",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown growth management alternatives analysis · other: capitalization rate 0.09 in Subarea 1","unverified","c124896626",240,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n239",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:240/2",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown growth management alternatives analysis · other: capitalization rate 0.11 in Subarea 3","unverified","c124896626",240,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n239",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:240/3",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown office buildings operating expense assumption · other: average annual operating expense $6.00 per gross sq. ft.","unverified","c124896626",240,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n239",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:249/1",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Rehabilitation of existing building, FAR four, C-3-0 area (Subarea 1) · other: value gain $60 per sq. ft. of land","unverified","c124896626",249,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n248",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:249/10001",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Subarea 1 historic building rehabilitation · finding: investment tax credit for rehabilitation is less than 15 percent of the value gain from new development (small historic building, Table G.1)","unverified","c124896626",249,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n248",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:249/2",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Demolition and new development, FAR four, C-3-0 area (Subarea 1) · other: value gain $850 per sq. ft. of land from new building","unverified","c124896626",249,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n248",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:249/3",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Rehabilitation versus new building, FAR eight, C-3-0 area (Subarea 1) · other: value gain from new building about twice that from rehabilitation","unverified","c124896626",249,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n248",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:257/1",1983,1983,"","building","study or report",null,"Building A (Alternative 1 TDR example) · other: 12 unused FAR to transfer","unverified","c124896626",257,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n256",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:257/2",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Building A (Alternative 1 TDR example) · other: at least $100 per FAR, or a total of $1,200","unverified","c124896626",257,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n256",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:257/3",1983,1983,"","building","study or report",null,"Building B (Alternative 1 TDR example) · other: 10 unused FAR; TDRs priced as low as $80 per FAR","unverified","c124896626",257,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n256",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:257/4",1983,1983,"","building","study or report",null,"Buildings C and D (TDR examples) · other: TDRs priced as low as $30 per FAR","unverified","c124896626",257,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n256",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:257/5",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Building C (Alternatives 2 through 5 TDR example) · finding: demolition and new development on its site is unprofitable","unverified","c124896626",257,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n256",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:259/1",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Building C (Example F), Alternative 1 · other: [name withheld] to developer $1,210 per square foot of land, assuming TDRs bought at minimum feasible cost from larger building","unverified","c124896626",259,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n258",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:259/2",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Building A (Example E), Alternative 1 · other: [name withheld] to developer $630 per square foot of land, assuming TDR purchases from smaller building","unverified","c124896626",259,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n258",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:259/3",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Building C · demolished: Not profitable to demolish Building C in the other Alternatives","unverified","c124896626",259,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n258",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:259/4",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Subarea 1 building (Example G) · other: [name withheld] increase from $850 to $1,300 per sq ft land in Alternative 1 with TDRs","unverified","c124896626",259,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n258",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:259/5",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Subarea 6 building (Example H) · other: [name withheld] decrease from $250 to $220 per sq ft land in Alternative 1 with TDRs","unverified","c124896626",259,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n258",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:271/1",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · finding: Higher rents in C-3 District compared to Alternative 1","unverified","c124896626",271,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n270",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:271/2",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · finding: Higher values of existing buildings in C-3 District compared to Alternative 1","unverified","c124896626",271,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n270",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:271/3",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · finding: Less space built in C-3 District compared to Alternative 1","unverified","c124896626",271,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n270",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:271/4",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · finding: Less employment growth in C-3 District; employment affected less than space because space is used more intensively","unverified","c124896626",271,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n270",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:271/5",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · finding: More space and more employment outside C-3 District, elsewhere in the City and region","unverified","c124896626",271,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n270",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:276/10001",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco real estate market · other: conversion of existing space to higher-rent uses is an ongoing process","unverified","c124896626",276,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n275",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:28/1",1983,1983,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco Planning Alternatives · other: Project File No. EE 81.3, Downtown San Francisco Planning Alternatives","unverified","c124896626",28,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n27",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:320/2",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"C-3 District major business categories · other: Overall densities for primary office, secondary office, retail trade and hotels will be most useful in future planning studies and project EIR evaluation","unverified","c124896626",320,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n319",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:340/4",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"[name withheld] (Secondary Office), C-3 District · finding: Expansion of out-of-state banks into prime downtown San Francisco market likely with deregulation","unverified","c124896626",340,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n339",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:344/2",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Entertainment and cultural facilities, downtown San Francisco · finding: Entertainment and other cultural facilities stimulated by Yerba Buena Center completion and increased tourist and convention business","unverified","c124896626",344,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n343",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:351/10003",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · other: Employment densities assumed to increase by one and one-half percent under Alternative 3","unverified","c124896626",351,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n350",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:351/10004",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · other: Employment densities assumed to increase by one-half percent under Alternative 2","unverified","c124896626",351,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n350",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:351/10005",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · other: Alternatives 2 through 5 do not constrain employment growth as much as they constrain development of new space in the C-3 District","unverified","c124896626",351,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n350",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:441/1",1983,1983,"","measure","study or report",null,"C-3 District employee modal split · other: Table J.10: employee modal split for p.m. peak-hour C-3 district primary work trips by areas 14 and 15","unverified","c124896626",441,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n440",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:502/2",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"downtown San Francisco high-rise office buildings · other: average annual natural gas 39,000 Btu and electricity 18 kwh per sq. ft. (survey of 30 downtown office buildings)","unverified","c124896626",502,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n501",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:544/1",1983,1983,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown projects tested in wind tunnel · other: 34 downtown projects tested in wind tunnel","unverified","c124896626",544,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n543",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:72/1",1983,1983,"","measure","study or report",null,"Proposition O high-rise initiative ordinance · height ft: 260 feet","unverified","c124896626",72,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n71",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:72/2",1983,1983,"","measure","study or report",null,"Proposition O high-rise initiative ordinance · height ft: 150 feet","unverified","c124896626",72,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n71",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:72/3",1983,1983,"","measure","study or report",null,"Proposition O high-rise initiative ordinance · height ft: 130 feet","unverified","c124896626",72,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n71",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:72/4",1983,1983,"","measure","study or report",null,"Proposition O high-rise initiative ordinance · height ft: 130 feet",null,"c124896626",72,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n71",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:72/5",1983,1983,"","measure","study or report",null,"Proposition O high-rise initiative ordinance · other: 8 to 1 basic floor area ratio","unverified","c124896626",72,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n71",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:78/1",1983,1983,"","measure","study or report",null,"C3O district · other: base FAR 7:1, maximum 14:1 (floor area ratio with development bonuses)","unverified","c124896626",78,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n77",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:78/2",1983,1983,"","measure","study or report",null,"C3R district · other: base FAR 5:1, maximum 10:1 (floor area ratio with development bonuses)","unverified","c124896626",78,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n77",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:78/3",1983,1983,"","measure","study or report",null,"C3G district · other: base FAR 5:1, maximum 10:1 (floor area ratio with development bonuses)",null,"c124896626",78,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n77",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:78/4",1983,1983,"","measure","study or report",null,"C3S district · other: base FAR 3.5:1, maximum 7:1; applicable area greatly reduced","unverified","c124896626",78,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n77",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:88/1",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan growth management alternatives · recommendation: Require that developers of new office buildings also provide housing","unverified","c124896626",88,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n87",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:88/2",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan growth management alternatives · recommendation: Allow downtown buildings to be larger if they include housing","unverified","c124896626",88,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n87",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:88/3",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan growth management alternatives · recommendation: Assure that there is enough land for housing","unverified","c124896626",88,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n87",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:88/4",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan growth management alternatives · recommendation: Protect residential uses adjacent to the downtown from encroachment of commercial uses","unverified","c124896626",88,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n87",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:88/5",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan growth management alternatives · recommendation: Reduce the economic incentive to replace significant buildings by allowing transfer of the site's unused development potential","unverified","c124896626",88,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n87",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:88/6",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan growth management alternatives · recommendation: Provide an additional development allowance to encourage retention and restoration of significant buildings","unverified","c124896626",88,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n87",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:88/7",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan growth management alternatives · recommendation: Carefully control new development in areas with concentrations of significant buildings","unverified","c124896626",88,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n87",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:88/8",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan growth management alternatives · recommendation: Redirect growth to other downtown locations","unverified","c124896626",88,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n87",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:88/9",1983,1983,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan growth management alternatives · recommendation: Protect industry from disruptive effects of office and housing development","unverified","c124896626",88,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n87",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:91/1",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Planning Code regulations for C-3 districts · finding: Planning Code regulations for the C-3 districts have not been analyzed comprehensively for some time","unverified","c124896626",91,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n90",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:91/2",1983,1983,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco office inventory · other: current office inventory of over 50 million square feet","unverified","c124896626",91,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n90",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:91/3",1983,1983,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown office development under construction · other: 6.8 million square feet currently under construction","unverified","c124896626",91,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n90",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:91/5",1983,1983,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown office space approved for construction · approved: over 5 million square feet of office space approved for construction","unverified","c124896626",91,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n90",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:91/6",1983,1983,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown office space under review · other: 8 million square feet under review","unverified","c124896626",91,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n90",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:91/7",1983,1983,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Downtown growth management alternatives · alternative: recommendations in this report evaluated as one alternative in the downtown EIR","unverified","c124896626",91,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n90",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:100/4",1983,1983,"","building","plan",null,"Preserving the Past buildings · historic rating: Preserving the Past","unverified","c124897620",100,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n99",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:100/5",1983,1983,"","building","plan",null,"Category IV buildings · historic rating: Category IV","unverified","c124897620",100,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n99",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:123/1",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"Downtown Plan upper tower bulk controls · height ft: Upper tower bulk controls apply to buildings taller than 160 feet","unverified","c124897620",123,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n122",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:123/2",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"Downtown Plan upper tower bulk controls · other: maximum plan width of 140 feet","unverified","c124897620",123,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n122",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:123/3",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"Downtown Plan upper tower bulk controls · other: maximum average floor area of 12,000 square feet","unverified","c124897620",123,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n122",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:123/4",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"Downtown Plan lower tower exception for buildings 500 feet or taller · other: maximum plan width of 190 feet","unverified","c124897620",123,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n122",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:123/5",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"Downtown Plan lower tower exception for buildings 500 feet or taller · other: maximum floor plate of 25,000 square feet","unverified","c124897620",123,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n122",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:124/1",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"Downtown Plan optional upper tower extension (Option I) · proposes: 10 percent of permitted building height allowed above the height limit","unverified","c124897620",124,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n123",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:124/2",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"Downtown Plan optional upper tower extension (Option II) · proposes: Roof plane of penthouse extension not to exceed 12,000 square feet","unverified","c124897620",124,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n123",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:124/3",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"Downtown Plan vertical attachments (flagpoles, steeples, pylons, chimneys, obelisks) · proposes: Maximum height of 75 feet, cross-sectional area under 100 square feet","unverified","c124897620",124,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n123",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:128/1",1983,1983,"","finding","plan",null,"Downtown street grids · finding: Downtown streets laid out in two basic patterns, the Jeffersonian and Spanish grids","unverified","c124897620",128,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n127",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:136/1",1983,1983,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Downtown Plan urban form policy · recommendation: Building forms should not create wind speeds in excess of eight miles per hour in pedestrian activity areas","unverified","c124897620",136,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n135",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:138/1",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"Downtown Plan streetscape policy · recommendation: Conserve the traditional street to building relationship that characterizes downtown San Francisco","unverified","c124897620",138,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n137",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:138/3",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"Downtown Plan streetwall setback chart (Chart D) · recommendation: Setback depth as a function of street width and streetwall height; setback not more than 1.25 times street width, optimum where height equals width","unverified","c124897620",138,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n137",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:139/1",1983,1983,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Downtown Plan streetscape policies · recommendation: Apply the streetscape policies in the design review of individual projects","unverified","c124897620",139,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n138",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:154/1",1983,1983,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Regional bus service on downtown streets · proposes: Carefully evaluate peak-hour regional bus service and select alternatives that reduce bus concentration on downtown streets","unverified","c124897620",154,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n153",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:161/6",1983,1983,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Downtown public rights of way · proposes: Allocate public rights of way by priority: pedestrians and emergency vehicles first, then transit, goods delivery, cars and taxis, and parking last","unverified","c124897620",161,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n160",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:167/2",1983,1983,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Off-street loading facilities policy · recommendation: Require off-street freight loading and service facilities in all new developments","unverified","c124897620",167,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n166",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:21/2",1983,1983,"","agency","plan",null,"Downtown Plan · lead agency: Department of City Planning","unverified","c124897620",21,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n20",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:21/3",1983,1983,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Downtown Plan · recommendation: preserving permanently nearly 300 buildings","unverified","c124897620",21,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n20",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:27/1",1983,1983,"","site","plan",null,"Downtown C-3 districts · other: largest concentration of commercial activity and employment in the Bay Region","unverified","c124897620",27,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n26",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:31/1",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"Downtown Plan · proposes: substantial changes in downtown zoning to control height and bulk of new buildings and encourage preservation of significant existing buildings","unverified","c124897620",31,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n30",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:35/3",1983,1983,"","finding","plan",null,"Downtown retail space · other: retail services approximately three million square feet in downtown San Francisco","unverified","c124897620",35,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n34",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:36/5",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"C-3 district · jobs: Nearly 280,000 people work in the C-3 district","unverified","c124897620",36,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n35",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:37/1",1983,1983,"","building","plan",null,"C-3 visitor hotels · units: more than 16,000 rooms in more than 60 hotels","unverified","c124897620",37,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n36",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:41/2",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"Downtown C-3 use districts · proposes: Modify C-3 use districts; Map 5 shows proposed C-3 use districts","unverified","c124897620",41,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n40",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:81/1",1983,1983,"","finding","plan",null,"Downtown open space policy · other: Address the need for human comfort in the design of open spaces by minimizing wind and maximizing sunshine","unverified","c124897620",81,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n80",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:81/2",1983,1983,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Downtown open space policy · recommendation: Provide different kinds of open space downtown, including sun and view terraces, gardens, plazas or parks, with requirements shown on Figure 5","unverified","c124897620",81,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n80",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:81/3",1983,1983,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Downtown open space policy · recommendation: Provide a variety of seating arrangements in open spaces throughout downtown; existing spaces without adequate seating should be retrofitted","unverified","c124897620",81,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n80",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:82/3",1983,1983,"","site","plan",null,"existing highly prized open spaces · other: Redwood Park, Sidney Walton Park, [name withheld], State Compensation Building Plaza","unverified","c124897620",82,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n81",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:83/1",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"Downtown open space system · recommendation: Develop an open space system that gives every person living and working downtown access to a sizable sunlit open space within convenient walking distance","unverified","c124897620",83,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n82",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:83/2",1983,1983,"","finding","plan",null,"Downtown open space walking distance · finding: The average distance most people are willing to walk to a park or plaza is approximately 900 feet","unverified","c124897620",83,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n82",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:83/4",1983,1983,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Downtown privately owned open space sites · recommendation: Development of privately owned open space sites for other uses should not be delayed if acquisition cannot be accomplished within a reasonable time","unverified","c124897620",83,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n82",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:83/6",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"Downtown open space facilities · recommendation: Open spaces should be open to the public from 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. at least six days a week","unverified","c124897620",83,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n82",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:83/7",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"Downtown open space grade · recommendation: Plazas and parks should be at or near grade level; any not at street level should connect by wide, visible stairways or ramps","unverified","c124897620",83,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n82",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:84/1",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"Downtown Plan open space policy · proposes: Locate open spaces so that distinctive openings are created in downtown's otherwise dominant streetwall","unverified","c124897620",84,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n83",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:89/2",1983,1983,"","building","plan",null,"Downtown San Francisco buildings · stories: six to twelve stories","unverified","c124897620",89,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n88",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:91/3",1983,1983,"","finding","plan",null,"Downtown A- and B-rated buildings · other: 35 of the remaining 344 A- and B-rated buildings declared landmarks","unverified","c124897620",91,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n90",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:91/5",1983,1983,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Downtown development sites · recommendation: Shift development to sites other than those occupied by significant structures","unverified","c124897620",91,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n90",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:92/1",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"Downtown Plan preservation strategy · other: 271 significant buildings required to be retained","unverified","c124897620",92,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n91",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:92/2",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"Downtown Plan preservation strategy · other: 223 contributory buildings given incentives to retain","unverified","c124897620",92,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n91",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:92/3",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"Significant buildings Category I · other: 234 significant buildings in Category I","unverified","c124897620",92,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n91",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:92/4",1983,1983,"","measure","plan",null,"Significant buildings Category II · other: 37 significant buildings in Category II","unverified","c124897620",92,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n91",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:96/2",1983,1983,"","building","plan",null,"Downtown Plan buildings list · other: A designated landmark and subject to Article 10 demolition constraints","unverified","c124897620",96,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n95",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897684:5/5",1983,1983,"","site","study or report",null,"New stadium sites near downtown · other: Detailed assessment of potential sites for a new stadium near downtown","unverified","c124897684",5,"https://archive.org/details/c124897684/page/n4",null,null,null,"Stadium feasibility analysis : task force report to the mayor, October 1983","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897684:69/2",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Sale-leaseback financing · finding: sale-leaseback method determined infeasible for financing the new stadium","unverified","c124897684",69,"https://archive.org/details/c124897684/page/n68",null,null,null,"Stadium feasibility analysis : task force report to the mayor, October 1983","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897684:69/3",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Tax allocation bonds · finding: tax allocation method infeasible for financing the stadium but might fund certain aspects of the project","unverified","c124897684",69,"https://archive.org/details/c124897684/page/n68",null,null,null,"Stadium feasibility analysis : task force report to the mayor, October 1983","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:10/4",1984,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan transit implementing actions recommended over E+C System · cost usd: $418 - 732 m","unverified","C124877529",10,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n9",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:10/5",1984,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan transit implementing actions total over E+C System · cost usd: $613 - 927 m","unverified","C124877529",10,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n9",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:47/1",1984,1983,"1983","finding","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown existing apartments · other: Existing Apartments (Units per block, 1983) map, Map 9","unverified","C124887761",47,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n46",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:102/1",1983,1983,"1983","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown bulk controls, Upper Tower Zone · other: maximum floor size of 8,100 sq. ft. at the top of the Upper Tower Zone","unverified","c124896626",102,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n101",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:105/1",1983,1983,"1983","measure","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · other: Maximum street wall height and angle of slope are being developed for listed downtown streets","unverified","c124896626",105,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n104","Fremont Street; Beale Street; Main Street; Spear Street; Steuart Street; First Street; Second Street; New Montgomery Street; Third Street",null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:105/2",1983,1983,"1983","measure","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · other: Sunlight access requirements for public open spaces in the C-3 district are being developed and will be published later","unverified","c124896626",105,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n104",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:129/1",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · other: C-3 use districts and height districts analysed in construction feasibility analysis by alternative","unverified","c124896626",129,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n128",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:201/1",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco: employer and employee surveys · other: Two surveys were conducted: a survey of employers in the C-3 District and a survey of employees working for these employers","unverified","c124896626",201,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n200",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:258/3",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"TDR feasibility Examples E and F · finding: developer more likely to purchase less expensive TDRs from larger buildings","unverified","c124896626",258,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n257",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:259/10001",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco housing incentives · alternative: Each Alternative except Alternative 1 includes incentives to produce housing; Alternatives 4 and 5 include requirements for providing housing as a condition of office development","unverified","c124896626",259,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n258",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:26/1",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco growth management alternatives · finding: Downtown San Francisco is already fully built, so no adverse impact on plant or animal life from any alternative","unverified","c124896626",26,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n25",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:26/2",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown growth alternatives · finding: Alternatives allowing high-rise buildings in Downtown could have significant impacts on wind patterns and shading","unverified","c124896626",26,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n25",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:26/3",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown growth alternatives · finding: Cumulative air quality standard violations possible from buildings permitted under some alternatives; needs further investigation","unverified","c124896626",26,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n25",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:26/4",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown growth alternatives · finding: Some alternatives could cause substantial increases in demand on the PG&E system and need further study","unverified","c124896626",26,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n25",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:260/2",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco housing incentives · other: Real estate feasibility analyses tested effectiveness of incentive provisions in producing housing and how housing requirements were likely to be met","unverified","c124896626",260,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n259",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:268/1",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco, C-3 District office development · other: Policies of an Alternative could affect size of buildings, availability of sites, and costs of development; evaluated relative to Alternative 1","unverified","c124896626",268,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n267",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:270/1",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · finding: rents would be higher under Alternatives 2, 3, 4 and 5 as compared to Alternative 1","unverified","c124896626",270,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n269",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:274/1",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco growth alternatives · other: Retail and hotel development cannot be predicted from the real estate development feasibility model as readily as new office development","unverified","c124896626",274,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n273",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:276/1",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · finding: Educational and non-profit organizations generally will not pay as high rents as traditional office users","unverified","c124896626",276,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n275",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:427/1",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · other: Travel demand projections prepared for 1984, 1990, and 2000 across five alternatives","unverified","c124896626",427,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n426",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:543/1",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown buildings wind impact study · finding: The exposure of the west facade was the most important determinant of wind impacts","unverified","c124896626",543,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n542",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:543/2",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown buildings wind impact study · finding: Buildings with less than 25% of their west facades exposed to west winds were generally found to have little impact","unverified","c124896626",543,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n542",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:9/1",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · other: List of tables continued: value of TDRs from designated historic buildings, housing production costs, space by use and subarea in C-3 District","unverified","c124896626",9,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n8",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:92/1",1983,1983,"1983","alternative","study or report",null,"Downtown growth limitation alternative (1 million sq ft per year) · alternative: limit growth to 1 million square feet per year","unverified","c124896626",92,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n91",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:109/3",1983,1983,"1983","finding","plan",null,"Downtown height and bulk rules · finding: code provisions implementing the policies need to be refined","unverified","c124897620",109,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n108",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:109/4",1983,1983,"1983","finding","plan",null,"Downtown high-rise office developments · finding: most new rectangles of similar shape, height and bulk demonstrate need for revised bulk rules","unverified","c124897620",109,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n108",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:109/5",1983,1983,"1983","finding","plan",null,"Downtown height limits · finding: heights too permissive in some areas where character and scale should be protected by lower heights","unverified","c124897620",109,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n108",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:125/1",1983,1983,"1983","recommendation","plan",null,"Downtown plan bulk controls · proposes: Bulk limits may be exceeded in exceptional cases with compensating factors and specified criteria","unverified","c124897620",125,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n124",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:129/1",1983,1983,"1983","recommendation","plan",null,"Downtown plan sun access criteria · proposes: sun access criteria to allow direct sunlight to reach the sidewalk during critical hours of the day","unverified","c124897620",129,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n128",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:136/10001",1983,1983,"1983","measure","plan",null,"Downtown Plan · other: wind speeds in excess of eight miles per hour in pedestrian activity areas should not be used","unverified","c124897620",136,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n135",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:136/10002",1983,1983,"1983","recommendation","plan",null,"Downtown Plan · recommendation: Modify building forms to reduce local wind currents through design review","unverified","c124897620",136,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n135",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:137/3",1983,1983,"1983","recommendation","plan",null,"Downtown Plan · recommendation: Prohibit highly reflective materials and encourage light-toned materials in new buildings","unverified","c124897620",137,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n136",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:137/4",1983,1983,"1983","recommendation","plan",null,"Planning Code · recommendation: Allow architectural projections; cornice and belt course limits eased; projections up to one foot prohibited below 7.5 feet above sidewalk grade","unverified","c124897620",137,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n136",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:137/5",1983,1983,"1983","recommendation","plan",null,"Planning Code · recommendation: Modify rules so gross floor area is measured from average line of window glass; one-third of bay window floor area not counted","unverified","c124897620",137,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n136",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:21/1",1983,1983,"1983","recommendation","plan",null,"Downtown Plan · recommendation: recommended Plan for downtown San Francisco submitted to City Planning Commission","unverified","c124897620",21,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n20",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:3/2",1983,1983,"1983","project","plan",null,"Downtown Plan · other: first proposal for comprehensive revision of downtown policies and regulations in 17 years","unverified","c124897620",3,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n2",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897684:23/4",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown multiuse stadium · cost usd: Combined on-site and off-site annual expenditures projected at $91.8 million per year","unverified","c124897684",23,"https://archive.org/details/c124897684/page/n22",null,null,null,"Stadium feasibility analysis : task force report to the mayor, October 1983","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897684:23/6",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown multiuse stadium · jobs: 2,107 on-site and off-site jobs","unverified","c124897684",23,"https://archive.org/details/c124897684/page/n22",null,null,null,"Stadium feasibility analysis : task force report to the mayor, October 1983","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897684:23/8",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown multiuse stadium · other: Estimated City tax revenues from admissions, sales, payroll, hotel and property taxes of $8.2 million per year","unverified","c124897684",23,"https://archive.org/details/c124897684/page/n22",null,null,null,"Stadium feasibility analysis : task force report to the mayor, October 1983","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897684:5/8",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Three priority downtown stadium sites · other: Task Force evaluated actual availability of three sites cited as priority for a new downtown stadium","unverified","c124897684",5,"https://archive.org/details/c124897684/page/n4",null,null,null,"Stadium feasibility analysis : task force report to the mayor, October 1983","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897684:69/5",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Lease revenue bonds · finding: financing costs range between 26% and 35% of total project costs","unverified","c124897684",69,"https://archive.org/details/c124897684/page/n68",null,null,null,"Stadium feasibility analysis : task force report to the mayor, October 1983","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897684:69/6",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Private sponsorship financing · finding: financing costs range between 12% and 25% of total project costs","unverified","c124897684",69,"https://archive.org/details/c124897684/page/n68",null,null,null,"Stadium feasibility analysis : task force report to the mayor, October 1983","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897684:71/1",1983,1983,"1983","project","study or report",null,"Downtown multiuse stadium · other: Financing costs for 36-month construction period at 9.5% lease revenue bonds","unverified","c124897684",71,"https://archive.org/details/c124897684/page/n70",null,null,null,"Stadium feasibility analysis : task force report to the mayor, October 1983","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897684:71/2",1983,1983,"1983","project","study or report",null,"Downtown multiuse stadium · other: Effective financing rate with investment income on unused funds","unverified","c124897684",71,"https://archive.org/details/c124897684/page/n70",null,null,null,"Stadium feasibility analysis : task force report to the mayor, October 1983","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897684:71/3",1983,1983,"1983","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown multiuse stadium · finding: Lease revenue bond method would impose a crucial obligation on the City","unverified","c124897684",71,"https://archive.org/details/c124897684/page/n70",null,null,null,"Stadium feasibility analysis : task force report to the mayor, October 1983","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:183/1",1983,1983,"1983-04-15","finding","study or report",null,"Recognized architectural resources in the C-3 district · finding: Table E.3.2 lists recognized architectural resources in the C-3 district (C-2-R Downtown Office District subarea)","unverified","c124896626",183,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n182",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:181/1",1983,1983,"APR 15 1983","site","study or report",null,"C-3 district recognized architectural resources · other: Recognized architectural resources listed in the C-3 (C-3-G Downtown Office) district, with block, lot, name and address per row","unverified","c124896626",181,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n180",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:15/1",1983,1983,"August 1983","project","plan",null,"The Downtown Plan · other: Proposal for citizen review","unverified","c124897620",15,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n14",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:3/1",1983,1983,"August 25, 1983","project","plan",null,"Downtown Plan · proposes: Draft for Citizen Review presented to City Planning Commission","unverified","c124897620",3,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n2",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:91/2",1983,1983,"In recent years","finding","plan",null,"Downtown A- and B-rated buildings · other: An average of eight A- and B-rated buildings a year demolished","unverified","c124897620",91,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n90",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:3/3",1983,1983,"January","event","plan",null,"Downtown Plan draft Environmental Impact Report · event: draft Environmental Impact Report to be published","unverified","c124897620",3,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n2",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:35/3",1983,1983,"July 1982","recommendation","study or report",null,"Guiding Downtown Development · other: Published by the Department of City Planning","unverified","c124896626",35,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n34",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:21/5",1983,1983,"June 9, 1980","alternative","study or report",null,"Alternative 3: SFRS initiatives · proposes: Package of five initiatives amending C-3 District regulations of the City Planning Code","unverified","c124896626",21,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n20",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:21/6",1983,1983,"June 9, 1980","event","study or report",null,"Alternative 3: SFRS initiatives · event: Public notices of intent to circulate petitions appeared","unverified","c124896626",21,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n20",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:92/2",1983,1983,"May 1981","event","study or report",null,"City Planning Commission Resolution 8982 · adopted: Resolution 8982 requiring individual project EIRs to prepare an alternative conforming to Guiding Downtown Development","unverified","c124896626",92,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n91",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:1/1",1983,1983,"May 1983","project","study or report",null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco · other: Downtown EIR consultant's report, Volume 2: Appendices","unverified","c124896626",1,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n0",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:3/1",1983,1983,"May 1983","project","study or report",null,"Growth Management Alternatives for Downtown San Francisco · other: Downtown EIR Consultant's Report, Volume 2: Appendices, May 1983, prepared by Environmental Science Associates, Inc.","unverified","c124896626",3,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n2",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:105/1",1984,1983,"May, 1983","alternative","study or report",null,"Scheme 1 Domed Downtown Stadium · cost usd: $102.0 million (housing 320 units, offices 1,257,800 sq. ft.)","unverified","C124878444",105,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n104",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:21/3",1983,1983,"November 1975","alternative","study or report",null,"Alternative 2: Proposition O initiative ordinance · proposes: Proposed initiative ordinance Proposition O presented to San Francisco","unverified","c124896626",21,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n20",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:21/1",1983,1983,"October 1979","alternative","study or report",null,"Alternative 1: Recommended Growth Management Program (Bolles/Livingston, 1979) · proposes: Reduction in height and revised bulk standards for new construction in C-3-O","unverified","c124896626",21,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n20",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:21/2",1983,1983,"October 1979","recommendation","study or report",null,"Alternative 1: Recommended Growth Management Program (Bolles/Livingston, 1979) · recommendation: Mandatory design review and Transportation Systems Management (TSM) program","unverified","c124896626",21,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n20",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:34/10001",1983,1983,"October 1979","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown Growth Management Program · recommendation: Chapter 3, Recommendations for Managing Downtown Growth, prepared for the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce by Bolles Associates and Livingston & Associates","unverified","c124896626",34,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n33",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897684:69/1",1983,1983,"October 1983","alternative","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium financing · alternative: Five financing alternatives analyzed for a new downtown stadium","unverified","c124897684",69,"https://archive.org/details/c124897684/page/n68",null,null,null,"Stadium feasibility analysis : task force report to the mayor, October 1983","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:146/1",1983,1983,"by the year 2000","finding","plan",null,"Downtown employment growth · other: employment may grow by as much as 100,000 jobs","unverified","c124897620",146,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n145",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:89/3",1983,1983,"late 1920s","building","plan",null,"Russ, Shell, and Pacific Telephone buildings · other: monumental size skyscrapers built in the late 1920s","unverified","c124897620",89,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n88",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:3/4",1983,1983,"late spring","event","plan",null,"Downtown Plan · event: Final action by City Planning Commission expected","unverified","c124897620",3,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n2",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:11/1",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan transit recommendations · finding: financial constraints do not pose an unreasonable barrier to the Downtown Plan transit objectives","unverified","C124877529",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n10",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:11/3",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan mandatory transit improvements · finding: financial feasibility virtually assured based upon MTC adopted project priorities and transit resource projections","unverified","C124877529",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n10",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:13/10001",1984,1984,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan · jobs: 100,000 additional downtown employees","unverified","C124877529",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n12",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:13/2",1984,1984,"","site","study or report",null,"Downtown office space inventory · floor area sqft: existing 55 million square-feet office inventory","unverified","C124877529",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n12",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:13/3",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Downtown Plan · jobs: increase in downtown employment totalling 100,000 persons","unverified","C124877529",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n12",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:14/3",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan peak-period commuters · other: 70,000 additional downtown workers traveling during peak commute periods","unverified","C124877529",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n13",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:14/4",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown peak-period commuters (Department guidelines) · other: 66,000 peak-period workers suggested by Department guidelines (Attachment A-2)","unverified","C124877529",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n13",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:15/4",1984,1984,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Golden Gate Transit and SamTrans curbside loading · proposes: Disperse curbside loading in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124877529",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n14",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:15/6",1984,1984,"","action","study or report",null,"Southern Pacific/CalTrain rail extension · alternative: Alternatives analysis/feasibility study: extension of Southern Pacific/CalTrain rail service to a downtown San Francisco terminal","unverified","C124877529",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n14",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:15/7",1984,1984,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan ride-sharing effort · other: Raise average vehicle occupancy from 1.4 to 1.6 persons per vehicle","unverified","C124877529",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n14",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:15/8",1984,1984,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan public transit effort · other: Raise average transit ridership from 55 to 62 percent of all commute trips","unverified","C124877529",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n14",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:16/1",1984,1984,"","action","study or report",null,"Additional public/private ferry service to downtown San Francisco · proposes: Additional public/private ferry service to downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124877529",16,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n15",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:17/4",1984,1984,"","measure","study or report",null,"Dispersed Golden Gate Transit and SamTrans curbside loading · proposes: Category IB, dispersed curbside loading in downtown","unverified","C124877529",17,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n16",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:30/1",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"SP/CalTrain underground terminal and subway · other: would be unnecessary with cross-platform transfer to BART near the airport","unverified","C124877529",30,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n29",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:34/10001",1984,1984,"","project","study or report",null,"SP/CalTrain extension to downtown underground terminal · cost usd: $341 million","unverified","C124877529",34,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n33",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:34/2",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown underground CalTrain terminal · finding: would only duplicate BART's six existing Market and Mission Street stations, with considerably poorer distribution","unverified","C124877529",34,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n33","Market Street",null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:35/3",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"SP/CalTrain downtown terminal · finding: less than 15,000 additional daily transit trips from a new downtown terminal","unverified","C124877529",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n34",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:35/4",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Commute ferry service to downtown San Francisco · finding: no viable expansion of commute ferry mode identified","unverified","C124877529",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n34",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:38/10001",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan transit improvements · finding: Financial feasibility of mandatory transit improvements for downtown commercial growth is virtually assured","unverified","C124877529",38,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n37",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:38/10002",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan transit initiatives · finding: Must compete for between 22 and 36 percent of regional discretionary transit capital","unverified","C124877529",38,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n37",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:40/1",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan transit capital initiatives · finding: many if not most transit capital initiatives are inherently more efficient and labor productive than the services they would replace or supplement","unverified","C124877529",40,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n39",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:45/1",1984,1984,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown office buildings · other: One office worker per 275 gross square feet","unverified","C124877529",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n44",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:45/2",1984,1984,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown office buildings · other: 18.1 daily person trip ends per 1,000 gross square feet","unverified","C124877529",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n44",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:45/3",1984,1984,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown office buildings · other: 2.5 visitor person trips per 1,000 gross square feet","unverified","C124877529",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n44",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:45/4",1984,1984,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown office buildings · other: P.M. peak hour person trips 10%","unverified","C124877529",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n44",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:82/2",1984,1984,"","action","study or report",null,"Privately operated non-stop bus service · other: non-stop bus service every 15 minutes","unverified","C124877529",82,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n81",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-3.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:83/1",1984,1984,"","measure","study or report",null,"Airport to Transbay terminal bus service (third level) · proposes: non-stop bus run between the airport and the Transbay terminal","unverified","C124877529",83,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n82",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:83/2",1984,1984,"","measure","study or report",null,"Airport to Transbay terminal bus service (third level) · other: every ten minutes throughout the day, 15 minutes late evening, 30 minutes early morning","unverified","C124877529",83,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n82",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-3.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:83/3",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Airport to Transbay terminal bus service (third level) · other: estimated travel time approximately 20 to 45 minutes depending on traffic conditions","unverified","C124877529",83,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n82",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-3.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:84/1",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART airport alternatives · finding: Partial easing of downtown San Francisco street demands and parking pressures","unverified","C124877529",84,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n83",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:11/2",1984,1984,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium · cost usd: $227.4 million (before capital offsets)","unverified","C124878444",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n10",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:115/3",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Candlestick renovation and downtown stadium bond issue estimates · other: Bond issue size estimates exclude some pertinent costs and potential capital offsets","unverified","C124878444",115,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n114",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:31/2",1984,1984,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium · cost usd: $227.4 million (before capital offsets)","unverified","C124878444",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n30",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:31/5",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium · finding: Task Force revenue projections assume Golden State Warriors as major long-term tenant without commitment","unverified","C124878444",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n30",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:31/6",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium · other: [name withheld] model: operating revenues cover all costs except $1.7 million yearly bond debt service","unverified","C124878444",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n30",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:39/7",1984,1984,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Downtown domed stadium · proposes: Original work program included only evaluation of a downtown domed stadium","unverified","C124878444",39,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n38",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:57/4",1984,1984,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Stadium Feasibility Analysis · alternative: 18 possible stadium sites identified near downtown; 14 evaluated in detail after 4 excluded","unverified","C124878444",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n56",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:87/2",1984,1984,"","site","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium · other: 70,000 capacity attendance","unverified","C124878444",87,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n86",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:87/3",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium · other: 22,400 San Francisco patrons projected; increase of 5,930 to 7,760 more San Francisco attendees","unverified","C124878444",87,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n86",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:87/4",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium · other: San Francisco patronage projected to rise from 33.8% (Candlestick) to 38% (downtown), a 4.2% difference","unverified","C124878444",87,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n86",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:87/5",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium · other: public transit use for baseball projected at a 50 percent increase over Candlestick Park","unverified","C124878444",87,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n86",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:91/1",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"I-280 Transfer Program · finding: none of the current design alternatives consider a downtown stadium","unverified","C124878444",91,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n90",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878842:44/1",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown office construction · finding: Too much downtown office construction is creating bad pressure on the housing market","unverified","C124878842",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124878842/page/n43",null,null,null,"Two hundred and one San Franciscans express their views on the problems facing the city and what needs to be done : a report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:106/6",1984,1984,"","finding","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown · finding: Millions of square feet of office space, hotels, and retail constructed; thousands of additional persons work downtown","unverified","C124887761",106,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n105",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:11/1",1984,1984,"","project","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown Plan · other: Existing downtown jobs: 280,000, of which 56 percent are held by San Franciscans","unverified","C124887761",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n10",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:11/2",1984,1984,"","project","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown Plan · other: Downtown office growth slowed from 1.6 million to 840 thousand sq ft per year","unverified","C124887761",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n10",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:11/3",1984,1984,"","action","ordinance or legislation",null,"City Planning Commission notification requirement for new downtown buildings · other: Sponsors notify city at least six months prior to project completion of prospective tenants and jobs","unverified","C124887761",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n10",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:12/1",1984,1984,"","measure","ordinance or legislation",null,"Transit Development Fee · other: $5 per foot on new office construction","unverified","C124887761",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n11",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:12/3",1984,1984,"","measure","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown transit mode share target · other: transit share of downtown work trips from 60% to 67%","unverified","C124887761",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n11",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:128/1",1984,1984,"","finding","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown San Francisco pedestrians · population: approximately 20,000 residents walk to their downtown workplaces","unverified","C124887761",128,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n127",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:128/4",1984,1984,"","recommendation","ordinance or legislation",null,"Large new hotels · recommendation: Require large new hotels to provide off-street passenger loading and unloading of tour buses","unverified","C124887761",128,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n127",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:128/5",1984,1984,"","recommendation","ordinance or legislation",null,"Planning Code · recommendation: Incorporate tour bus loading requirements shown in Table 21 into the Planning Code","unverified","C124887761",128,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n127",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:128/6",1984,1984,"","finding","ordinance or legislation",null,"Off-street tour bus loading requirement · other: 0-200 hotel rooms require 0 off-street loading spaces","unverified","C124887761",128,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n127",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:17/3",1984,1984,"","site","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown proposed C-3 districts · floor area sqft: nearly 8.2 million square feet of retail shops and restaurants","unverified","C124887761",17,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n16",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:17/4",1984,1984,"","site","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown proposed C-3 districts · jobs: 23,000 retail workers, mostly in sales and service occupations","unverified","C124887761",17,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n16",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:22/1",1984,1984,"","finding","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown C-3 district · jobs: Nearly 280,000 people work in the C-3 district","unverified","C124887761",22,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n21",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:22/2",1984,1984,"","site","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown C-3 visitor hotels · units: more than 16,000 rooms","unverified","C124887761",22,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n21",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:22/3",1984,1984,"","site","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown C-3 visitor hotels · floor area sqft: about nine million gross square feet","unverified","C124887761",22,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n21",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:72/1",1984,1984,"","finding","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown Plan preservation objectives · recommendation: Preserve notable landmarks and areas of historic, architectural, or aesthetic value","unverified","C124887761",72,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n71",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:73/1",1984,1984,"","measure","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown preservation strategy (Significant Buildings) · proposes: retention of buildings rated as Significant Buildings","unverified","C124887761",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n72",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:73/2",1984,1984,"","measure","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown preservation strategy (Contributory Buildings) · other: incentives to encourage retention of Contributory Buildings","unverified","C124887761",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n72",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:73/3",1984,1984,"","measure","ordinance or legislation",null,"Significant Buildings Category I · other: 209 significant buildings in Category I","unverified","C124887761",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n72",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:73/4",1984,1984,"","measure","ordinance or legislation",null,"Significant Buildings Category II · other: 42 significant buildings in Category II","unverified","C124887761",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n72",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:73/5",1984,1984,"","measure","ordinance or legislation",null,"Transferable development rights (TDR) program · proposes: transfer of unused development rights from Significant and Contributory Buildings","unverified","C124887761",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n72",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:12/1",1984,1984,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan amendments wind standard · other: ground level wind currents must not exceed 11 mph comfort standard in pedestrian areas more than 10% of time between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. in C3 Districts","unverified","C124891981",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n10",null,null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:12/2",1984,1984,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan amendments wind standard · other: winds must not exceed 7 mph standard in outdoor sitting areas more than 10% of the time","unverified","C124891981",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n10",null,null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:12/3",1984,1984,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan amendments wind standard · other: no buildings permitted that would cause ground level wind speeds to reach or exceed the 26 mph hazard level for one hour of the year","unverified","C124891981",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n10",null,null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:12/4",1984,1984,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan amendments wind standard · other: if developer proves standards cannot be met, building may add no more than 3 mph to permitted speed","unverified","C124891981",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n10",null,null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:136/1",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Wind setbacks study, downtown San Francisco · finding: Three 24-foot setbacks at base, mid-tower and upper tower reduced measured wind velocity at the corner test point by 15%","unverified","C124891981",136,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n134",null,null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:136/2",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Comfort study, downtown San Francisco · finding: Areas receiving direct solar radiation are comfortable more than 50% of the time","unverified","C124891981",136,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n134",null,null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:136/3",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Comfort study, downtown San Francisco · finding: Street level wind velocity ratio above .50 makes the place likely uncomfortable much of the time","unverified","C124891981",136,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n134",null,null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:15/2",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco parks and plazas · finding: windswept or shaded parks and plazas are virtually deserted","unverified","C124891981",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n13",null,null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:7/1",1984,1984,"","project","study or report",null,"San Francisco Downtown Plan · other: measures being considered to implement the Downtown Plan","unverified","C124891981",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n5",null,null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:11/3",1985,1984,"1984","project","study or report",null,"Pacific Transportation Systems · proposes: service from San Jose to Oakland Airport, San Francisco Airport, and Downtown San Francisco","unverified","C123305299",11,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n10",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:11/10001",1984,1984,"1984","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan transit improvements · finding: financial feasibility of mandatory transit improvements virtually assured","unverified","C124877529",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n10",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:37/5",1984,1984,"1984","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan transit capital cost analysis · finding: Costs are set against regional transit capital resources to assess financial feasibility of the Downtown Plan","unverified","C124877529",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n36",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:37/6",1984,1984,"1984","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan transit capital cost analysis · finding: High end costs are set against high resource estimate, presuming federal and state funding assurance","unverified","C124877529",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n36",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:6/4",1984,1984,"1984","project","study or report",null,"Current five-year transit capacity expansion plans (RTIP) · cost usd: just over $1 billion","unverified","C124877529",6,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n5",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:9/1",1984,1984,"1984","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan transit projects · recommendation: Implement the transit projects listed in Table S-2","unverified","C124877529",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n8",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:129/3",1984,1984,"1984","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium · cost usd: Annual debt cost on lease revenue bonds under private sponsorship","unverified","C124878444",129,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n128",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:129/4",1984,1984,"1984","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium · other: Internal rate of return of 5.5 percent on the $40 million private sponsor investment","unverified","C124878444",129,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n128",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:23/4",1984,1984,"1984","alternative","study or report",null,"New downtown stadium · alternative: building a new downtown stadium, with no adverse impacts associated","unverified","C124878444",23,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n22",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:23/5",1984,1984,"1984","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium · proposes: construction of a downtown stadium","unverified","C124878444",23,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n22",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878842:62/1",1984,1984,"1984","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown traffic congestion · finding: Most downtown traffic congestion is generated by commuters entering or leaving the city","unverified","C124878842",62,"https://archive.org/details/C124878842/page/n61",null,null,null,"Two hundred and one San Franciscans express their views on the problems facing the city and what needs to be done : a report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878842:62/2",1984,1984,"1984","recommendation","study or report",null,"Congested downtown streets · recommendation: Eliminate cars from some of the more congested downtown streets and turn them into pedestrian malls","unverified","C124878842",62,"https://archive.org/details/C124878842/page/n61",null,null,null,"Two hundred and one San Franciscans express their views on the problems facing the city and what needs to be done : a report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:114/2",1984,1984,"1984","recommendation","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown San Francisco transit service · recommendation: Each carrier serving downtown prepares a five-year service expansion plan, updated every year","unverified","C124887761",114,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n113",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:114/3",1984,1984,"1984","finding","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown San Francisco employment growth · finding: Projected downtown employment growth can only be accommodated by expanding peak commute period, carpooling and transit service","unverified","C124887761",114,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n113",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:137/10001",1984,1984,"1984","finding","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown San Francisco · finding: Downtown and its growth is clearly an area of concern due to seismic hazards","unverified","C124887761",137,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n136",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:138/2",1984,1984,"1984","recommendation","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown San Francisco · recommendation: Require geologic or soil engineering site investigation and compensating structural design for all new structures in special geologic study areas","unverified","C124887761",138,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n137",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:53/2",1984,1984,"1984","site","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown open space · other: height of new buildings adjacent to major spaces controlled by Proposition K criteria to protect sunlight","unverified","C124887761",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n52",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:59/1",1984,1984,"1984","recommendation","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown open space policy · recommendation: Require usable indoor and outdoor open space, accessible to the public, as part of downtown development","unverified","C124887761",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n58",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:59/2",1984,1984,"1984","recommendation","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown open space policy · recommendation: Open space should be extended to non-residential uses in the downtown, proportional to nonresidential space in the building","unverified","C124887761",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n58",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:59/3",1984,1984,"1984","recommendation","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown sunlit plazas and parks · recommendation: Give priority to development of sunlit plazas and parks as highly valued open space","unverified","C124887761",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n58",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:59/6",1984,1984,"1984","recommendation","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown seating in open spaces · recommendation: Adequate seating should be required in new facilities in direct relation to open space size; existing spaces should be retrofitted","unverified","C124887761",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n58",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:75/1",1984,1984,"1984","measure","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown master plan proposal · other: proposed C-3 district boundary map","unverified","C124887761",75,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n74",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:12/6",1984,1984,"1984","finding","study or report",null,"Sun and wind study · finding: study breaks new ground: no prior research evaluated combined effects of sun and wind on outdoor comfort","unverified","C124891981",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n10",null,null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:142/1",1984,1984,"1984","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco western edge · finding: abrupt change in building heights causes significant impact on wind velocities on adjacent streets and parks","unverified","C124891981",142,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n140",null,null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:142/3",1984,1984,"1984","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown height zones · recommendation: height zone transitions should be made gradually, avoiding changes that exceed 100% of the height of the previous zone","unverified","C124891981",142,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n140",null,null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:142/4",1984,1984,"1984","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco height zone lines · finding: height zone lines drawn along streets created abrupt height changes from one side of the street to the other","unverified","C124891981",142,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n140",null,null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:145/1",1984,1984,"1984","building","study or report",null,"Alcoa Building, Bank of America, [name withheld], Immigration Building · other: Buildings facing northwest and west winds","unverified","C124891981",145,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n143",null,null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885198:23/6",1984,1984,"1984-1990","finding","plan",null,"Downtown Plan · jobs: employment downtown projected to grow by 41,670 workers","unverified","C124885198",23,"https://archive.org/details/C124885198/page/n22",null,null,null,"Residence : the residence element of the comprehensive plan of the city and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:36/1",1984,1984,"1984-2000","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan transit implementing actions, Category IB · cost usd: $418-732 million (1983 dollars), cumulative $613-927 million","unverified","C124877529",36,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n35",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:36/2",1984,1984,"1984-2000","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan transit implementing actions, Category II · cost usd: Net additional capital investment over and above E+C systems: $1,050-2,241 million","unverified","C124877529",36,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n35",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:36/3",1984,1984,"1984-2000","project","study or report",null,"SP downtown terminal · cost usd: Deduct $341M in Category II costs","unverified","C124877529",36,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n35",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:37/1",1984,1984,"1984-2000","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan transit implementing actions · cost usd: Category IB $613-927 million cumulative, Downtown Plan recommended level","unverified","C124877529",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n36",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:37/2",1984,1984,"1984-2000","project","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan Category II transit actions, BART to SFO · cost usd: $1,322-2,827 million cumulative, including BART SFO","unverified","C124877529",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n36",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:37/3",1984,1984,"1984-2000","project","study or report",null,"Southern Pacific downtown terminal (SP TMNL) · cost usd: $1,323-2,514 million cumulative, Category II","unverified","C124877529",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n36",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:37/4",1984,1984,"1984-2000","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan transit implementing actions · other: Downtown Plan transit capital costs require 5-12% of regional transit capital resources","unverified","C124877529",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n36",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:20/2",1984,1984,"1984-88","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan · other: Key premise: transit capital projects in MTC's RTIP (1984-88) will be implemented to provide peak-period capacity for appropriate downtown growth, except Eastbay and San Francisco corridors","unverified","C124877529",20,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n19",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:20/1",1984,1984,"Fall 1984","finding","study or report",null,"Wind data for San Francisco (Figure 11) · other: Wind data is preliminary; data more relevant for downtown San Francisco available Fall 1984","unverified","C124891981",20,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n18",null,null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:15/3",1984,1984,"February 28, 1984","finding","study or report",null,"New downtown domed stadium · finding: Information and conclusions not sufficient to point out a clear course of action",null,"C124878444",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n14",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:129/1",1984,1984,"February 3, 1984","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium · cost usd: City responsibility of $1,700,000 of $12 million annual debt service ([name withheld] model)","unverified","C124878444",129,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n128",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:31/7",1984,1984,"June 1984","event","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium · event: plans to commence downtown stadium assumed to begin","unverified","C124878444",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n30",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878444:35/2",1984,1984,"October, 1983","recommendation","study or report",null,"Mayor's Stadium Task Force · recommendation: pursue the construction of a new stadium near downtown and reuse Candlestick Park for some other purpose","unverified","C124878444",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124878444/page/n34",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the report of the Mayor's Stadium Task Force","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124877529:14/2",1984,1984,"September 1983","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan employment projection · jobs: just under 80,000 persons (Department of City Planning guidelines)","unverified","C124877529",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124877529/page/n13",null,null,null,"An analysis, the financial feasibility of public transit recommendations in the San Francisco downtown plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:67/2",1984,1984,"late 1920s","building","ordinance or legislation",null,"Russ, Shell, and Pacific Telephone buildings · other: of a more monumental size","unverified","C124887761",67,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n66",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:26/2",1985,1985,"","project","study or report",null,"Larkspur Ferry · other: 11-nautical mile route from Larkspur to the downtown San Francisco Ferry Building","unverified","C123305299",26,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n25",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:26/3",1985,1985,"","project","study or report",null,"Larkspur Ferry · other: cruising speed of 21 knots","unverified","C123305299",26,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n25",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:26/4",1985,1985,"","project","study or report",null,"Larkspur Ferry · other: passenger capacity of 750","unverified","C123305299",26,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n25",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:31/2",1985,1985,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Pacific Transportation Systems · proposes: Service from San Jose to San Francisco Airport, downtown San Francisco, and Oakland Airport","unverified","C123305299",31,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n30",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:38/1",1985,1985,"","project","study or report",null,"Pacific Transportation Systems hovercraft service · proposes: hovercraft service from San Jose to the San Francisco and Oakland Airports and downtown San Francisco","unverified","C123305299",38,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n37",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:38/2",1985,1985,"","project","study or report",null,"Pacific Transportation Systems hovercraft service · other: revenue passenger service every two hours from 6:00 a.m. to midnight daily","unverified","C123305299",38,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n37",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:39/1",1985,1985,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Pacific Transportation Systems proposed hovercraft service · other: Alviso to downtown San Francisco, 45 minutes one way","unverified","C123305299",39,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n38",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-3.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:49/1",1985,1985,"","finding","study or report",null,"Alameda to Downtown San Francisco travel corridor · finding: High speed water transit provides the fastest door-to-door travel times at an estimated out-of-pocket cost below driving alone","unverified","C123305299",49,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n48",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:52/2",1985,1985,"","finding","study or report",null,"Oakland Airport to downtown San Francisco route · finding: Not considered economically viable in UMTA analysis","unverified","C123305299",52,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n51",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:55/3",1985,1985,"","measure","study or report",null,"Auto parking downtown San Francisco · cost usd: $150/month in San Francisco Financial District","unverified","C123305299",55,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n54",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:55/4",1985,1985,"","finding","study or report",null,"HSWT Sunnyvale to downtown San Francisco trip · cost usd: HSWT total cost 4.65 (fare 4.00, MIC estimate)","unverified","C123305299",55,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n54",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:56/1",1985,1985,"","project","study or report",null,"Forum Hydrolines HSWT service · proposes: service from the Larkspur Ferry Terminal to downtown San Francisco","unverified","C123305299",56,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n55",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:62/1",1985,1985,"","finding","study or report",null,"Petaluma River to downtown San Francisco HSWT profit/loss analysis · other: Profit/loss analysis (in thousands): deficits of $3,990 (400-passenger HSWT), $19,335 (hovercraft), $245,359 (bus) per year","unverified","C123305299",62,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n61",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:62/2",1985,1985,"","measure","study or report",null,"Petaluma River to downtown San Francisco HSWT ridership assumption · other: Market of 1,500 passengers x 2 = 3,000 fares per day at 260 days at $3.35","unverified","C123305299",62,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n61",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:62/3",1985,1985,"","measure","study or report",null,"Petaluma River to downtown San Francisco vessel and terminal capital costs · cost usd: Catamaran $1.8 million; hovercraft $2.5 million; bus $200,000; includes ferry terminal and dredging","unverified","C123305299",62,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n61",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:64/1",1985,1985,"","site","study or report",null,"MIC destination area for downtown San Francisco HSWT patronage analysis · other: financial district or points within seven minutes walk of the Ferry Building","unverified","C123305299",64,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n63",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","m",0,-3.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:69/1",1985,1985,"","finding","study or report",null,"HSWT Pittsburg/Martinez to Downtown San Francisco · jobs: Projected HSWT patronage total 550 (second table, Pittsburg/Martinez/Benicia commuters to downtown San Francisco)","unverified","C123305299",69,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n68",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:70/1",1985,1985,"","finding","study or report",null,"HSWT service Alameda to Downtown San Francisco · finding: HSWT appears faster and cheaper than driving alone","unverified","C123305299",70,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n69",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:70/2",1985,1985,"","finding","study or report",null,"HSWT service Alameda to Downtown San Francisco · other: Bridge bonds must be defeased; CTC and MIC approval required","unverified","C123305299",70,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n69",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:70/3",1985,1985,"","finding","study or report",null,"Oakland Airport to downtown San Francisco ferry service · finding: Service would not be financially feasible (UMTA analysis)","unverified","C123305299",70,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n69",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:71/1",1985,1985,"","finding","study or report",null,"Sonoma/Marin to Downtown San Francisco corridor · finding: no known legal barriers to HSWT services","unverified","C123305299",71,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n70",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:71/2",1985,1985,"","finding","study or report",null,"400-passenger catamaran service, mouth of Petaluma River to downtown San Francisco · other: farebox recovery 72%","unverified","C123305299",71,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n70",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124879916:118/1",1985,1985,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Downtown new development open space requirement · proposes: Each downtown development required to provide open space proportional to building size, excluding residence space","unverified","C124879916",118,"https://archive.org/details/C124879916/page/n117",null,null,null,"Recreation and open space element of the master plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124879916:118/2",1985,1985,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Downtown open space system · proposes: New open spaces created in deficiency areas not within 900 feet of an existing or proposed major open space (Map 10)","unverified","C124879916",118,"https://archive.org/details/C124879916/page/n117",null,null,null,"Recreation and open space element of the master plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124879916:119/1",1985,1985,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Downtown open spaces · recommendation: Provide a variety of seating arrangements in open spaces throughout downtown","unverified","C124879916",119,"https://archive.org/details/C124879916/page/n118",null,null,null,"Recreation and open space element of the master plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124879916:127/2",1985,1985,"","site","plan",null,"Downtown San Francisco · other: traditional form of structures built vertically from the sidewalk edge","unverified","C124879916",127,"https://archive.org/details/C124879916/page/n126",null,null,null,"Recreation and open space element of the master plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124884501:14/1",1985,1985,"","alternative","study or report",null,"HSWT service, Alameda to Downtown San Francisco · alternative: faster and cheaper than driving alone","unverified","C124884501",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124884501/page/n13",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area : executive summary","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124884501:14/2",1985,1985,"","finding","study or report",null,"HSWT service, Alameda to Downtown San Francisco · other: bridge bonds must be defeased; CTC and MTC approval required","unverified","C124884501",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124884501/page/n13",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area : executive summary","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124884501:15/1",1985,1985,"","finding","study or report",null,"HSWT service from Sonoma/Marin to downtown San Francisco · finding: No known legal barriers to HSWT services in the corridor","unverified","C124884501",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124884501/page/n14",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area : executive summary","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124884501:15/2",1985,1985,"","finding","study or report",null,"Catamaran and hovercraft service from [name withheld] mouth to downtown San Francisco · finding: Estimated farebox recovery: 400-passenger catamaran 72%, 88-passenger hovercraft 19%, bus 49%","unverified","C124884501",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124884501/page/n14",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area : executive summary","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124884501:15/3",1985,1985,"","finding","study or report",null,"HSWT service from Pittsburg/Martinez to downtown San Francisco · finding: HSWT will not increase total transit ridership in this corridor","unverified","C124884501",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124884501/page/n14",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area : executive summary","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124884501:15/4",1985,1985,"","finding","study or report",null,"HSWT service from Pittsburg/Martinez to downtown San Francisco · finding: Higher out-of-pocket cost and longer travel time than BART","unverified","C124884501",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124884501/page/n14",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area : executive summary","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124884501:19/1",1985,1985,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Pacific Transportation Systems hovercraft service · other: Alviso to downtown San Francisco: 45 minutes one way (proposed)","unverified","C124884501",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124884501/page/n18",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area : executive summary","n","a",0,-3.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887752:107/3",1985,1985,"","site","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown San Francisco C-3 districts · other: four separate C-3 Downtown Commercial districts","unverified","C124887752",107,"https://archive.org/details/C124887752/page/n106",null,null,null,"Downtown plan : an ordinance of the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:54/1",1985,1985,"1985","alternative","study or report",null,"Pacific Transportation Systems hovercraft service · proposes: hovercraft service from Alviso to the San Francisco Airport and to downtown San Francisco","unverified","C123305299",54,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n53",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:54/2",1985,1985,"1985","finding","study or report",null,"Oakland Airport to San Francisco Airport and downtown San Francisco route · finding: not considered financially feasible","unverified","C123305299",54,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n53",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:54/3",1985,1985,"1985","finding","study or report",null,"Oakland Airport to San Francisco Airport and downtown San Francisco route · other: break-even one-way daily ridership of 1,128 trips at $3.45 fare on AP-188 craft","unverified","C123305299",54,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n53",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:55/1",1985,1985,"1985","site","study or report",null,"HSWT downtown San Francisco destination · other: San Francisco HSWT destination is Ferry Building Terminal","unverified","C123305299",55,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n54",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124879916:127/10001",1985,1985,"1985","recommendation","plan",null,"Recreation and open space element of the master plan · recommendation: Place and arrange open space to complement and structure the urban form in downtown","unverified","C124879916",127,"https://archive.org/details/C124879916/page/n126",null,null,null,"Recreation and open space element of the master plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887752:213/1",1985,1985,"1985","building","ordinance or legislation",null,"Appendix to Article 11, Category II buildings · historic rating: Category II","unverified","C124887752",213,"https://archive.org/details/C124887752/page/n212",null,null,null,"Downtown plan : an ordinance of the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887752:213/2",1985,1985,"1985","building","ordinance or legislation",null,"Appendix DD to Article 14, Category IV buildings · historic rating: Category IV","unverified","C124887752",213,"https://archive.org/details/C124887752/page/n212",null,null,null,"Downtown plan : an ordinance of the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:104/2",1987,1985,"1985","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan · other: prohibition of demolition of 250 Significant buildings","unverified","C124889732",104,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n103",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:104/3",1987,1985,"1985","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan · other: encouragement for preservation of 189 contributory buildings","unverified","C124889732",104,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n103",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:104/4",1987,1985,"1985","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan · other: establishment of six conservation districts","unverified","C124889732",104,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n103",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902184:81/8",1987,1985,"1985","site","study or report",null,"Market Street downtown · other: Market Street in downtown San Francisco, where South Bayshore residents shop","unverified","C124902184",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124902184/page/n80","Market Street",null,null,"Issues report for the South Bayshore Study Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:113/3",1979,1985,"1985","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown housing · population: 31,000 more Downtown employees living in San Francisco by 1985","unverified","C124924016",113,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n112",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:115/1",1979,1985,"1985","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown-generated housing demand · other: 17,200 housing units by 1985 and 16,700 more by 2000","unverified","C124924016",115,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n114",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:125/1",1979,1985,"1985","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco traffic volumes · other: traffic volumes increase about 20 percent by 1985","unverified","C124924016",125,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n124",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:7/4",1979,1985,"1985","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco peak-period auto traffic · finding: No increase in peak-period auto traffic could be accommodated beyond 1985","unverified","C124924016",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n6",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:71/4",1979,1985,"1985","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown peak-period auto traffic · finding: unlikely that any significant increase in peak-period auto traffic volumes could occur beyond 1985","unverified","C124924016",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n70",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924113:3/3",1979,1985,"1985","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · units: 17,200 new housing units needed for Downtown employees by 1985","unverified","C124924113",3,"https://archive.org/details/C124924113/page/n2",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : Phase 1 study : summary","n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich:35/2",1985,1985,"1985-07-01","resolution",null,"continued","Consideration of temporary street closures in downtown San Francisco for the San Francisco Marathon was continued to July 8, 1985.","quoted","journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich",35,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich/page/n34",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:49/2",1985,1985,"8:30 a.m.","finding","study or report",null,"Alameda to Downtown San Francisco travel corridor · other: A.m. peak travel times assumed arriving downtown San Francisco for an 8:30 a.m. work start","unverified","C123305299",49,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n48",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:40/2",1985,1985,"April 1985","project","study or report",null,"[name withheld] of Commerce commute water transit proposal · proposes: Commute-hour water transit service from Pittsburg and Martinez to downtown San Francisco using a 400 passenger Nichols Brothers Catamaran","unverified","C123305299",40,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n39",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:55/2",1985,1985,"Fall 1983","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco travel time comparison · other: Financial District used as downtown destination with 8:30 a.m. work arrival time","unverified","C123305299",55,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n54",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124879916:5/1",1985,1985,"November 1984","action","plan",null,"Downtown Plan open space chapter · adopted: adopted by the Planning Commission as part of the Master Plan","unverified","C124879916",5,"https://archive.org/details/C124879916/page/n4",null,null,null,"Recreation and open space element of the master plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:59/2",1985,1985,"Year 2000","finding","study or report",null,"HSWT commuters to downtown San Francisco · other: projected 15,247 commuters in Year 2000","unverified","C123305299",59,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n58",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:61/1",1985,1985,"Year 2000","project","study or report",null,"High Speed Water Transit patronage, Sonoma/Marin to Downtown San Francisco (first table total) · other: 2,200 HSWT patrons (total)","unverified","C123305299",61,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n60",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:61/2",1985,1985,"Year 2000","project","study or report",null,"High Speed Water Transit patronage, Sonoma/Marin to Downtown San Francisco (second table total) · other: 3,400 HSWT patrons (total)","unverified","C123305299",61,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n60",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:26/7",1985,1985,"fall, 1985","recommendation","study or report",null,"Larkspur Ferry · event: a minimum of two additional commute hour trips will be added after conversion to diesel","unverified","C123305299",26,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n25",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:26/6",1985,1985,"recent","event","study or report",null,"Larkspur Ferry · event: daily round trips increased from 3 to 8","unverified","C123305299",26,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n25",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:26/1",1985,1985,"since December 1976","project","study or report",null,"Larkspur Ferry · lead agency: Ferry Transit Division of the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway, and Transportation District","unverified","C123305299",26,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n25",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124886509:37/1",1986,1986,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium (Giants) · other: Giants average annual paid attendance estimated at 1.4 million, assuming continued A's competition","unverified","C124886509",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124886509/page/n36",null,null,null,"Examination of the economics of a downtown stadium","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124886509:37/2",1986,1986,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium (Giants) · other: Average attendance could increase by as much as 700,000 if the A's relocate","unverified","C124886509",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124886509/page/n36",null,null,null,"Examination of the economics of a downtown stadium","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124886509:39/1",1986,1986,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium (Giants attendance) · finding: Candlestick 22% decline due in part to arrival of a new stadium","unverified","C124886509",39,"https://archive.org/details/C124886509/page/n38",null,null,null,"Examination of the economics of a downtown stadium","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124886509:39/2",1986,1986,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium (Giants attendance) · finding: Locational benefit associated primarily with mid-week night games","unverified","C124886509",39,"https://archive.org/details/C124886509/page/n38",null,null,null,"Examination of the economics of a downtown stadium","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124886509:7/3",1986,1986,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown baseball stadium · proposes: Constructing a downtown baseball stadium for lease to the Giants","unverified","C124886509",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124886509/page/n6",null,null,null,"Examination of the economics of a downtown stadium","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124886509:21/1",1986,1986,"1986","project","study or report",null,"Downtown Stadium · proposes: Pro forma revenue and expenses per final proposal, 1.4M attendance, 1986 $000s, compared with Candlestick","unverified","C124886509",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124886509/page/n20",null,null,null,"Examination of the economics of a downtown stadium","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124886509:21/2",1986,1986,"1986","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Stadium vs Candlestick Park · other: Net surplus<deficit> shown as <5,166>, <1,093> and <4,073> (thousands, 1986 $), columns not fully legible","unverified","C124886509",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124886509/page/n20",null,null,null,"Examination of the economics of a downtown stadium","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124886509:9/1",1986,1986,"1986","project","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium · cost usd: $18.5 million initial City investment","unverified","C124886509",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124886509/page/n8",null,null,null,"Examination of the economics of a downtown stadium","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124886509:9/2",1986,1986,"1986","project","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium · other: Expected annual average attendance 1.4 million","unverified","C124886509",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124886509/page/n8",null,null,null,"Examination of the economics of a downtown stadium","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124886509:9/3",1986,1986,"1986","project","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium · cost usd: Annual operating expenses and debt service approximately $5.8 million to be recovered or absorbed by City","unverified","C124886509",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124886509/page/n8",null,null,null,"Examination of the economics of a downtown stadium","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124886509:9/4",1986,1986,"1986","alternative","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium revenue sharing proposal · rent usd: Giants pay $4 million annual rental","unverified","C124886509",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124886509/page/n8",null,null,null,"Examination of the economics of a downtown stadium","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124886509:9/5",1986,1986,"1986","alternative","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium revenue sharing proposal · cost usd: City absorbs $1.8 million annually","unverified","C124886509",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124886509/page/n8",null,null,null,"Examination of the economics of a downtown stadium","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124886509:9/6",1986,1986,"1986","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown stadium · finding: Market too small to support two teams in San Francisco/Oakland","unverified","C124886509",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124886509/page/n8",null,null,null,"Examination of the economics of a downtown stadium","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:48/3",1995,1986,"1986/87-1990/91","project","study or report",null,"CalTrain extension into downtown San Francisco · other: Only identified downtown terminal site for the extension is the Transbay Terminal area","unverified","C124914193",48,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n48",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887309:15/2",1986,1986,"several years ago","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · finding: downtown at capacity and space costly","unverified","C124887309",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124887309/page/n14",null,null,null,"Business relocations out of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887309:5/3",1986,1986,"several years before 1986","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown office market · finding: downtown office vacancy rate was virtually nonexistent when relocation decisions were made several years earlier","unverified","C124887309",5,"https://archive.org/details/C124887309/page/n4",null,null,null,"Business relocations out of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:106/1",1987,1987,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan annual limit on new office space · other: 950,000 square feet of new office space over three years","unverified","C124889732",106,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n105",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:106/2",1987,1987,"","measure","study or report",null,"Proposition M · other: 475,000 square feet of new office space per year","unverified","C124889732",106,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n105",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:106/3",1987,1987,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Contributory buildings in downtown · recommendation: Reconsider whether more restrictions on demolition of contributory buildings are necessary","unverified","C124889732",106,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n105",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:11/1",1987,1987,"","action","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan · other: recent advance in the City's commitment to protect architectural and historic resources","unverified","C124889732",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n10",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:111/1",1987,1987,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown significant and contributory buildings · other: more than 400 significant and contributory buildings in the downtown","unverified","C124889732",111,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n110",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:111/3",1987,1987,"","site","study or report",null,"Article 11 preservation provisions · other: Preservation of buildings and districts of architectural, historical, and aesthetic importance in C-3","unverified","C124889732",111,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n110",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:112/1",1987,1987,"","measure","study or report",null,"Article 11 of the Planning Code · other: 250 significant buildings","unverified","C124889732",112,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n111",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:112/2",1987,1987,"","measure","study or report",null,"Article 11 conservation districts · other: six conservation districts","unverified","C124889732",112,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n111",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:112/3",1987,1987,"","finding","study or report",null,"Article 11 Downtown Plan preservation approach · finding: far more effective, rational, and equitable than ad hoc consideration of landmarks one at a time","unverified","C124889732",112,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n111",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:156/10002",1987,1987,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown conservation districts · recommendation: submit downtown conservation districts for evaluation as certified historic districts","unverified","C124889732",156,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n155",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:156/3",1987,1987,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco preservation strategy · other: Recommended previously by [name withheld] for Foundation for San Francisco's Architectural Heritage","unverified","C124889732",156,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n155",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:168/1",1987,1987,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan · finding: Department of City Planning plans and programs division demonstrated a strong commitment to historic preservation in developing and implementing the Downtown Plan","unverified","C124889732",168,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n167",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:182/2",1987,1987,"","building","study or report",null,"Mills Building · other: design heavily influenced by the architectural trends of the Chicago firm of Burnham and Root and the work of [name withheld]","unverified","C124889732",182,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n181",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:19/5",1987,1987,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan · finding: one of the strongest and most comprehensive approaches to historic preservation in a major city","unverified","C124889732",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n18",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:25/1",1987,1987,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan · other: protects 250 significant buildings","unverified","C124889732",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n24",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:25/2",1987,1987,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan · other: establishes six conservation districts","unverified","C124889732",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n24",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:32/1",1987,1987,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan · other: Survey and evaluation systems used for ratings of buildings in the Downtown Plan","unverified","C124889732",32,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n31",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:66/2",1987,1987,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan · finding: The Downtown Plan prohibits the demolition of 250 significant buildings","unverified","C124889732",66,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n65",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891459:19/9",1987,1987,"","finding","study or report",null,"All fifteen open spaces examined · finding: located in downtown commercial or high density residential zoning districts","unverified","C124891459",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124891459/page/n18",null,null,null,"Proposition K-- the Sunlight Ordinance : memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891459:21/1",1987,1987,"","site","study or report",null,"Maritime Plaza · other: most shaded open space in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124891459",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124891459/page/n20",null,null,null,"Proposition K-- the Sunlight Ordinance : memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:185/1",1987,1987,"1987","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan · finding: Downtown Plan and recent historic district designations show that grouping buildings in a geographic area for protection is quicker, more efficient, and more politically acceptable than serial single-building designation","unverified","C124889732",185,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n184",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891459:15/2",1987,1987,"1987","site","study or report",null,"Fifteen Downtown Open Spaces · other: Fifteen downtown open spaces studied for sun and shadow","unverified","C124891459",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124891459/page/n14",null,null,null,"Proposition K-- the Sunlight Ordinance : memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891459:15/3",1987,1987,"1987","recommendation","study or report",null,"Proposition K open spaces · recommendation: Absolute Limit on new shadow to be proposed for each individual park","unverified","C124891459",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124891459/page/n14",null,null,null,"Proposition K-- the Sunlight Ordinance : memorandum","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889732:149/1",1987,1987,"May 29, 1980","finding","study or report",null,"Planning Commission list of architecturally and historically significant buildings (May 29, 1980) · finding: now obsolete compared with the lists of buildings of significance adopted in the Downtown Plan","unverified","C124889732",149,"https://archive.org/details/C124889732/page/n148",null,null,null,"Historic preservation in San Francisco : an evaluation of programs affecting historic resources for the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:48/2",1995,1988,"1988-1993","project","study or report",null,"CalTrain extension into downtown San Francisco · proposes: Extend CalTrain service into downtown San Francisco and relocate its terminal to the Transbay Terminal site","unverified","C124914193",48,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n48",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:48/5",1995,1988,"1988-1993","finding","study or report",null,"CalTrain extension into downtown San Francisco · other: Increase of 38,000 - 44,000 riders per day with extension and 136 trains/day service","unverified","C124914193",48,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n48",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:48/6",1995,1988,"1988-1993","finding","study or report",null,"CalTrain extension into downtown San Francisco · other: Increase of 50,000-58,000 riders per day if downtown parking costs increase significantly","unverified","C124914193",48,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n48",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902555:45/4",1988,1988,"after a game","finding","study or report",null,"U.S. 101/80 freeway through downtown San Francisco · other: Traffic is often very heavy after a game","unverified","C124902555",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124902555/page/n44","U.S. 101/80",null,null,"Candlestick Park transportation improvement plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124905937:198/2",1990,1990,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan Zoning Ordinance · other: zoning ordinance considered in land use analysis, including Article 11 conservation districts","unverified","C124905937",198,"https://archive.org/details/C124905937/page/n197",null,null,null,"Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124905937:201/1",1990,1990,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown Plan Environmental Impact Report · other: forecasts and impact assessments prepared","unverified","C124905937",201,"https://archive.org/details/C124905937/page/n200",null,null,null,"Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909650:45/1",1990,1990,"","finding","study or report",null,"Oakland to San Francisco commuter (BART) · cost usd: $3.50 daily round-trip BART fare","unverified","C124909650",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124909650/page/n44",null,null,null,"Market-based solutions to the transportation crisis","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909650:45/2",1990,1990,"","finding","study or report",null,"Oakland to San Francisco commuter (employee transportation allowance) · other: $75/month transportation allowance, $900/year","unverified","C124909650",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124909650/page/n44",null,null,null,"Market-based solutions to the transportation crisis","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909650:45/4",1990,1990,"","finding","study or report",null,"Oakland to San Francisco commuter (BART service) · other: 40 hours/year saved","unverified","C124909650",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124909650/page/n44",null,null,null,"Market-based solutions to the transportation crisis","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:279/1",1983,1990,"1990","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown growth management alternatives · alternative: Forecast of conversion to office is the same to 1990 for all Alternatives","unverified","c124896626",279,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n278",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:239/1",1983,1990,"1990 to 2000","site","study or report",null,"C-3 District office rent areas · other: C-3 District divided into eight office rent areas, labelled A through H","unverified","c124896626",239,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n238",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:239/2",1983,1990,"1990 to 2000","site","study or report",null,"[name withheld], E and F · other: typical office rents assumed moderately higher than the present","unverified","c124896626",239,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n238",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124904465:41/4",1991,1991,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Mid-sized downtown performing arts facility · proposes: develop and maintain a mid-sized downtown performing arts facility","unverified","C124904465",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124904465/page/n40",null,null,null,"Proposed arts policy for the city and county of San Francisco : proposal for adoption","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124904854:49/1",1991,1991,"","finding","plan",null,"Vanpools serving downtown San Francisco · other: 300 vanpools serve downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124904854",49,"https://archive.org/details/C124904854/page/n48",null,null,null,"Bay Area '91 clean air plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124908577:56/5",1992,1992,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco commuter travel · other: mass transit and ridesharing account for about 76% of commuter travel","unverified","C124908577",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124908577/page/n55",null,null,null,"[Public information documents relating to Port of San Francisco waterfront plan project]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124908577:60/1",1992,1992,"over the next 10 years","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · finding: will remain the hub of commuter ferry activity","unverified","C124908577",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124908577/page/n59",null,null,null,"[Public information documents relating to Port of San Francisco waterfront plan project]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124912715:10/1",1993,1993,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown office workers using MUNI · finding: 92.0% of downtown arrivals occur during the peak period of 6:30 - 9:30 AM","unverified","C124912715",10,"https://archive.org/details/C124912715/page/n9",null,null,null,"Citywide travel behavior survey : PUC/MUNI data","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124912715:10/2",1993,1993,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown office workers using MUNI · finding: 88.4% of departures occur during the peak period of 3:50 - 6:30 PM","unverified","C124912715",10,"https://archive.org/details/C124912715/page/n9",null,null,null,"Citywide travel behavior survey : PUC/MUNI data","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914713:19/5",1993,1993,"","agency","study or report",null,"SamTrans · other: needs to store approximately 15 to 20 buses midday in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124914713",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124914713/page/n18",null,null,null,"Transbay Transit Terminal current and future needs study : staff working paper : final","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914713:40/5",1993,1993,"","finding","study or report",null,"Bay Area high speed rail terminal · finding: Private financing would be easier to obtain if the Bay Area terminal were in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124914713",40,"https://archive.org/details/C124914713/page/n39",null,null,null,"Transbay Transit Terminal current and future needs study : staff working paper : final","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914713:9/1",1993,1993,"","project","study or report",null,"Transbay Transit Terminal Transit Needs Study · lead agency: Metropolitan Transportation Commission and Caltrans District 4","unverified","C124914713",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124914713/page/n8",null,null,null,"Transbay Transit Terminal current and future needs study : staff working paper : final","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914713:9/2",1993,1993,"","project","study or report",null,"Transbay Transit Terminal · other: Study of current and potential long-term transit services accessing the Terminal and necessary layout and features","unverified","C124914713",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124914713/page/n8",null,null,null,"Transbay Transit Terminal current and future needs study : staff working paper : final","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101737372:19/7",1993,1993,"1993","finding","study or report",null,"Non-commute trip rates among downtown retail workers · finding: highest non-commute trip rates occur among downtown retail workers","unverified","C101737372",19,"https://archive.org/details/C101737372/page/n18",null,null,null,"Citywide travel behavior survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124912715:10/6",1993,1993,"1993","finding","study or report",null,"Employee TIDF trip generation rate on MUNI · other: Employee TIDF trip rate = 0.622","unverified","C124912715",10,"https://archive.org/details/C124912715/page/n9",null,null,null,"Citywide travel behavior survey : PUC/MUNI data","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124912715:10/7",1993,1993,"1993","finding","study or report",null,"Visitor TIDF trip generation rate on MUNI · other: Visitor TIDF trip rate = 0.028","unverified","C124912715",10,"https://archive.org/details/C124912715/page/n9",null,null,null,"Citywide travel behavior survey : PUC/MUNI data","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124912715:12/1",1993,1993,"1993","finding","study or report",null,"Citywide travel behavior survey (PUC/MUNI) · other: U/L ratio of 1.51 for downtown office workers, versus 1.39 from 1980 survey used in 1987 TIDF cost certification","unverified","C124912715",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124912715/page/n11",null,null,null,"Citywide travel behavior survey : PUC/MUNI data","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124912715:12/4",1993,1993,"1993","finding","study or report",null,"MUNI commute travel times for office workers · other: Median travel time for office workers inside and outside downtown is 45 minutes in the morning and 55 minutes in the evening","unverified","C124912715",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124912715/page/n11",null,null,null,"Citywide travel behavior survey : PUC/MUNI data","n","a",0,-2.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:21/6",1995,1993,"1993","event","study or report",null,"Transbay Transit Terminal · other: 12 local, regional, intercity and tour bus operators used the Terminal building","unverified","C124914193",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n21",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914494:38/1",1993,1993,"1993","alternative","study or report",null,"Alternative A underground transit terminal · proposes: five bus platforms and forty-one bus berths","unverified","C124914494",38,"https://archive.org/details/C124914494/page/n37",null,null,null,"Transit terminal study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914494:38/2",1993,1993,"1993","alternative","study or report",null,"Alternative A underground transit terminal · proposes: five bus platforms and forty-one bus berths meeting projected future needs","unverified","C124914494",38,"https://archive.org/details/C124914494/page/n37",null,null,null,"Transit terminal study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914713:26/3",1993,1993,"1993","site","study or report",null,"Transbay Transit Terminal · other: location is prime for regional bus services, in the financial district in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124914713",26,"https://archive.org/details/C124914713/page/n25",null,null,null,"Transbay Transit Terminal current and future needs study : staff working paper : final","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124912636:82/2",1993,1993,"September 1993","finding","audit",null,"Private garages downtown · other: average one-hour rate $4.70","unverified","C124912636",82,"https://archive.org/details/C124912636/page/n81",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Parking and Traffic Commission : management audit of city-owned garages","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124912715:12/2",1993,1993,"early 1980s","finding","study or report",null,"MUNI service realignment · other: Realignment of MUNI service in early 1980s to provide enhanced and more direct service downtown may explain U/L ratio change","unverified","C124912715",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124912715/page/n11",null,null,null,"Citywide travel behavior survey : PUC/MUNI data","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124918135:29/7",1995,1994,"November 1994","action","study or report",null,"Proposition O · cost usd: up to $300,000 for research update","unverified","C124918135",29,"https://archive.org/details/C124918135/page/n28",null,null,null,"Analysis of potential dedicated funding sources for the Municipal Railway (MUNI) : report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914005:149/5",1995,1995,"","property_record","audit",null,"Golden Gate Parking Company garages (managed by City Park) · use: three garages and lots in downtown San Francisco owned by Golden Gate Parking Company, managed by City Park","unverified","C124914005",149,"https://archive.org/details/C124914005/page/n148",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the Tax Collector's Office","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914005:163/4",1995,1995,"","finding","audit",null,"Pine and Montgomery Street business registration · other: 63 percent of businesses not registered with the Tax Collector's Office","unverified","C124914005",163,"https://archive.org/details/C124914005/page/n162","Pine Street",null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the Tax Collector's Office","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:105/1",1995,1995,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco urban form · recommendation: Relate the height of buildings to important attributes of the city pattern and to the height and character of existing and proposed development","unverified","C124914193",105,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n105",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:105/2",1995,1995,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown transit access · recommendation: Build and maintain rapid transit lines from downtown to all suburban corridors and major centers of activity in San Francisco","unverified","C124914193",105,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n105",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:105/3",1995,1995,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown auto trips · recommendation: Provide incentives for the use of transit, carpools and vanpools, and reduce the need for new or expanded automobile parking facilities","unverified","C124914193",105,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n105",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:106/1",1995,1995,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown parking policy · recommendation: Discourage new long-term commuter parking spaces in and around downtown","unverified","C124914193",106,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n106",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:21/2",1995,1995,"","building","study or report",null,"Transbay Transit Terminal · other: busiest transit terminal on the West Coast","unverified","C124914193",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n21",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:21/4",1995,1995,"","building","study or report",null,"Transbay Transit Terminal · other: six tracks on upper floor, 5 minute loading and unloading period","unverified","C124914193",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n21",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916766:11/2",1995,1995,"","recommendation","plan",null,"High-speed rail link · proposes: Develop high-speed rail that links downtown San Francisco directly to all major interstate and national passenger rail corridors","unverified","C124916766",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124916766/page/n10",null,null,null,"Transportation : an element of the master plan of the city and county of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916766:13/4",1995,1995,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Transportation Element · recommendation: Build on successful private sector worksite programs such as the downtown Transportation Brokerage Program","unverified","C124916766",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124916766/page/n12",null,null,null,"Transportation : an element of the master plan of the city and county of San Francisco","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124918135:31/1",1995,1995,"","project","study or report",null,"Downtown transit benefit assessment district · other: Engineer's Report required before district formation","unverified","C124918135",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124918135/page/n30",null,null,null,"Analysis of potential dedicated funding sources for the Municipal Railway (MUNI) : report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124918135:31/4",1995,1995,"","measure","study or report",null,"Transit Impact Development Fee (TIDF) · cost usd: $5.00 per square foot on new downtown office space","unverified","C124918135",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124918135/page/n30",null,null,null,"Analysis of potential dedicated funding sources for the Municipal Railway (MUNI) : report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124920755:181/2",1995,1995,"","site","study or report",null,"[name withheld] · other: new store in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124920755",181,"https://archive.org/details/C124920755/page/n180",null,null,null,"San Francisco bicycle plan : draft report","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124920755:245/2",1995,1995,"","finding","study or report",null,"Embarcadero and Montgomery Street BART stations · other: BART commuters have no bike parking facilities available","unverified","C124920755",245,"https://archive.org/details/C124920755/page/n244",null,null,null,"San Francisco bicycle plan : draft report","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124920755:266/3",1995,1995,"","site","study or report",null,"combined BART/MUNI subway stations · other: primary focus for bicycle parking upgrades at highest patronage stations","unverified","C124920755",266,"https://archive.org/details/C124920755/page/n265",null,null,null,"San Francisco bicycle plan : draft report","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124920755:395/1",1995,1995,"","event","study or report",null,"Bicycle Bill lock test · other: Bicycle Bill attacked 9 locks on a bike locked to a pole in downtown San Francisco, timed","unverified","C124920755",395,"https://archive.org/details/C124920755/page/n394",null,null,null,"San Francisco bicycle plan : draft report","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124920755:51/4",1995,1995,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Downtown bicycle parking · other: joint development opportunities to be studied","unverified","C124920755",51,"https://archive.org/details/C124920755/page/n50",null,null,null,"San Francisco bicycle plan : draft report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124904854:23/1",1991,1995,"1995","project","plan",null,"Caltrain extension to downtown San Francisco · event: Scheduled for 1995; proposal still under study","unverified","C124904854",23,"https://archive.org/details/C124904854/page/n22",null,null,null,"Bay Area '91 clean air plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:19/1",1998,1995,"1995","finding","study or report",null,"SFO daily air passengers, Downtown San Francisco · other: 21,000 enplaned and deplaned daily SFO air passengers (MTC 1995 survey)","unverified","C124909173",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n18",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916766:37/1",1995,1995,"1995","recommendation","plan",null,"Transportation Element Policy 4.1 · recommendation: Rapid transit lines from outlying corridors should lead to stations and terminals adjacent or connected to each other in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124916766",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124916766/page/n36",null,null,null,"Transportation : an element of the master plan of the city and county of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124918135:31/3",1995,1995,"1995","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown net deficit · cost usd: $33,933,740 in 1995 dollars","unverified","C124918135",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124918135/page/n30",null,null,null,"Analysis of potential dedicated funding sources for the Municipal Railway (MUNI) : report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914005:7/2",1995,1995,"1995-04-25","finding","audit",null,"Tax Collector's Office business registration · finding: Budget Analyst sample of five downtown buildings found 43 percent of tenants not registered with Tax Collector","unverified","C124914005",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124914005/page/n6",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the Tax Collector's Office","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914005:221/1",1995,1995,"4/21/95","finding","audit",null,"City Park operations audit · finding: audit results reasonable and fair","unverified","C124914005",221,"https://archive.org/details/C124914005/page/n220",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the Tax Collector's Office","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:54/1",1995,1995,"December 992","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Multi-Operator Downtown Bus Storage Facility Feasibility Study · finding: clear need to provide for storage of commute and other buses in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124914193",54,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n54",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:54/2",1995,1995,"December 992","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Multi-Operator Downtown Bus Storage Facility Feasibility Study · other: potential midday bus storage demand of 190 to 380 vehicles for the future","unverified","C124914193",54,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n54",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:54/3",1995,1995,"December 992","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Multi-Operator Downtown Bus Storage Facility Feasibility Study · finding: considerable cost savings for public bus operators to store buses midday downtown rather than deadheading to storage outside downtown","unverified","C124914193",54,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n54",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:54/4",1995,1995,"December 992","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Multi-Operator Downtown Bus Storage Facility Feasibility Study · other: eight potential sites evaluated for acquisition or development for bus storage","unverified","C124914193",54,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n54",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:54/5",1995,1995,"December 992","recommendation","study or report",null,"San Francisco Multi-Operator Downtown Bus Storage Facility Feasibility Study · recommendation: no specific site recommended for storage facility development","unverified","C124914193",54,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n54",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:71/1",1995,1995,"February 1994","finding","study or report",null,"CalTrain passengers · finding: Approximately 57 percent of passengers get off in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124914193",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n71",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916766:20/1",1995,1995,"July 1995","recommendation","plan",null,"Transportation Element, Master Plan of San Francisco · recommendation: Discourage new long-term commuter parking spaces for single-occupant automobiles in and around downtown; limit long-term spaces to the existing number","unverified","C124916766",20,"https://archive.org/details/C124916766/page/n19",null,null,null,"Transportation : an element of the master plan of the city and county of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916766:20/2",1995,1995,"July 1995","recommendation","plan",null,"Transportation Element, Master Plan of San Francisco · recommendation: Locate any new long-term parking structures in the areas peripheral to downtown, connected to transit shuttle service","unverified","C124916766",20,"https://archive.org/details/C124916766/page/n19",null,null,null,"Transportation : an element of the master plan of the city and county of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916766:20/3",1995,1995,"July 1995","recommendation","plan",null,"Transportation Element, Master Plan of San Francisco · recommendation: Limit parking in downtown so that auto trips to and from downtown do not harm its growth or amenity","unverified","C124916766",20,"https://archive.org/details/C124916766/page/n19",null,null,null,"Transportation : an element of the master plan of the city and county of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916766:40/2",1995,1995,"July 1995","measure","plan",null,"Transportation Element Policy 5.5 (high-speed rail) · proposes: High-speed rail linking downtown San Francisco to interstate and national passenger rail corridors","unverified","C124916766",40,"https://archive.org/details/C124916766/page/n39",null,null,null,"Transportation : an element of the master plan of the city and county of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916766:89/1",1995,1995,"July 1995","measure","plan",null,"[name withheld][name withheld] · other: Map 14 defines adjacent areas appropriate for short-term parking facilities in downtown","unverified","C124916766",89,"https://archive.org/details/C124916766/page/n88",null,null,null,"Transportation : an element of the master plan of the city and county of San Francisco","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:73/1",1995,1995,"June 1992","finding","study or report",null,"High-speed rail extension to downtown San Francisco · finding: Provision of high-speed rail to downtown San Francisco is considered a necessity to make the service marketable","unverified","C124914193",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n73",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:73/10001",1995,1995,"June 1992","finding","study or report",null,"High-speed rail extension to downtown San Francisco · finding: Provision of high-speed rail to downtown San Francisco is considered a necessity to make the service marketable",null,"C124914193",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n73",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124918135:29/6",1995,1995,"November 1994","event","study or report",null,"Proposition O · other: defeated by voters","unverified","C124918135",29,"https://archive.org/details/C124918135/page/n28",null,null,null,"Analysis of potential dedicated funding sources for the Municipal Railway (MUNI) : report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915018:35/1",1996,1996,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Downtown San Francisco urban form · proposes: Create an urban form for downtown that enhances San Francisco's stature as one of the world's most visually attractive cities","unverified","C124915018",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124915018/page/n34",null,null,null,"Wireless telecommunications services (WTS) facilities siting guidelines","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915018:35/2",1996,1996,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Downtown San Francisco specialized retail · proposes: Improve downtown's position as the region's prime location for specialized retail trade","unverified","C124915018",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124915018/page/n34",null,null,null,"Wireless telecommunications services (WTS) facilities siting guidelines","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124918144:8/2",1996,1996,"","project","study or report",null,"new downtown ballpark · other: $471,000 to $766,000 annually in direct revenue to the City","unverified","C124918144",8,"https://archive.org/details/C124918144/page/n7",null,null,null,"Review of the projected costs and economic benefits associated with the San Francisco Giants' proposed ballpark at China Basin","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921838:14/1",1996,1996,"","site","study or report",null,"San Francisco downtown · other: high density downtown where activities, high rise buildings, and jobs are concentrated","unverified","C124921838",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124921838/page/n13",null,null,null,"An Overview of the San Francisco economy","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921892:285/6",1996,1996,"","recommendation","audit",null,"MUNI Line 9 and SAMTRANS Line 7B · recommendation: merge the two lines after the PM peak from Visitation Valley into downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124921892",285,"https://archive.org/details/C124921892/page/n284",null,null,null,"Management audit of the San Francisco Municipal Railway","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921892:284/4",1996,1996,"each weekday after 8:00 PM","finding","audit",null,"Service by adjacent transit properties after 8:00 PM · other: 63 scheduled round-trips on nine lines","unverified","C124921892",284,"https://archive.org/details/C124921892/page/n283",null,null,null,"Management audit of the San Francisco Municipal Railway","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914500:125/2",1996,1996,"each year","action","study or report",null,"Assessor field survey · other: Downtown San Francisco is canvassed each year","unverified","C124914500",125,"https://archive.org/details/C124914500/page/n124",null,null,null,"San Francisco County assessment practices survey","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916748:144/2",1997,1997,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Mid-Embarcadero, Broadway/Embarcadero and Transbay Terminal sites · other: Mode split assumes these downtown sites; ferry customers would use bus at the Transbay Terminal site","unverified","C124916748",144,"https://archive.org/details/C124916748/page/n143",null,null,null,"M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916748:155/1",1997,1997,"","finding","study or report",null,"DeYoung Museum downtown site vs Golden Gate Park site · other: Downtown sites expected to increase share of persons using public transit, slight increase in City revenues","unverified","C124916748",155,"https://archive.org/details/C124916748/page/n154",null,null,null,"M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916748:155/2",1997,1997,"","finding","study or report",null,"DeYoung Museum downtown site vs Golden Gate Park site · other: Downtown site projected to generate approximately 38,000 more transit riders annually than a Golden Gate Park site","unverified","C124916748",155,"https://archive.org/details/C124916748/page/n154",null,null,null,"M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916748:155/3",1997,1997,"","finding","study or report",null,"DeYoung Museum downtown site · other: Up to $38,000 in additional Muni revenue could be generated by a downtown site","unverified","C124916748",155,"https://archive.org/details/C124916748/page/n154",null,null,null,"M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919324:128/1",1997,1997,"","action","plan",null,"Downtown goods delivery · proposes: Establish goods-delivery times downtown that give trucks priority over automobiles","unverified","C124919324",128,"https://archive.org/details/C124919324/page/n127",null,null,null,"The sustainability plan for the city of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922692:213/4",1997,1997,"","finding","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown pedestrian environment · other: over a half a million people walk in downtown San Francisco every day","unverified","C124922692",213,"https://archive.org/details/C124922692/page/n212",null,null,null,"San Francisco general plan : amendments to the general plan : adopted between September 1988 and July 1997","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922692:233/1",1997,1997,"","measure","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown Area Plan pedestrian network · proposes: Pedestrian improvements: pavement, trees, containers with seasonal flowers, street lights, banners and awnings, benches and sitting areas added to streets","unverified","C124922692",233,"https://archive.org/details/C124922692/page/n232",null,null,null,"San Francisco general plan : amendments to the general plan : adopted between September 1988 and July 1997","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922692:235/1",1997,1997,"","measure","ordinance or legislation",null,"Base Case Street · other: 10 ft sidewalk minimum; 12-14 ft preferable","unverified","C124922692",235,"https://archive.org/details/C124922692/page/n234",null,null,null,"San Francisco general plan : amendments to the general plan : adopted between September 1988 and July 1997","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922692:240/1",1997,1997,"","recommendation","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown streetscape plans · recommendation: Specific street designs recommended in addition to standard [name withheld] designs","unverified","C124922692",240,"https://archive.org/details/C124922692/page/n239",null,null,null,"San Francisco general plan : amendments to the general plan : adopted between September 1988 and July 1997","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922692:240/2",1997,1997,"","project","ordinance or legislation",null,"Proposed Downtown Pedestrian Network Improvements · proposes: Proposed downtown pedestrian network improvements, Figure 6","unverified","C124922692",240,"https://archive.org/details/C124922692/page/n239",null,null,null,"San Francisco general plan : amendments to the general plan : adopted between September 1988 and July 1997","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:281/1",2002,1997,"1997","measure","environmental impact report",null,"Naval Station Treasure Island ferry terminal access · other: Total ferry person-trips from [name withheld]/Ferry Building: 12,455 1,415 13,665 1,590 6,470 765 (Alternatives 1-3, daily and peak hour as printed)","unverified","C101747471",281,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n280",null,null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919971:30/1",1997,1997,"August 1997","finding","study or report",null,"Multimedia industry in downtown San Francisco · finding: Downtown San Francisco's concentration of content-related professionals is one of its strengths","unverified","C124919971",30,"https://archive.org/details/C124919971/page/n29",null,null,null,"Multimedia in San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919315:67/2",1997,1997,"Loma Prieta and Northridge earthquakes","event","study or report",null,"Market Street · event: Sections closed from intersection to intersection to facilitate north- and south-bound traffic flow","unverified","C124919315",67,"https://archive.org/details/C124919315/page/n66","Market Street",null,null,"Riding out future quakes : pre-earthquake planning for post-earthquake transportation system recovery in the San Francisco Bay region","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922692:23/5",1997,1997,"November 29, 1984","event","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown Area Plan · adopted: Downtown Area Plan adopted by Resolution Number 10163","unverified","C124922692",23,"https://archive.org/details/C124922692/page/n22",null,null,null,"San Francisco general plan : amendments to the general plan : adopted between September 1988 and July 1997","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697894:145/2",1998,1998,"","building","environmental impact report",null,"Transamerica Pyramid · other: Marks the present boundary of large-scale development","unverified","C101697894",145,"https://archive.org/details/C101697894/page/n144",null,null,null,"City College of San Francisco Chinatown/North Beach campus : comments and responses","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697894:258/1",1998,1998,"","project","environmental impact report",null,"Kearny Street / Columbus Avenue Project · other: Section 106, NHPA supporting information","unverified","C101697894",258,"https://archive.org/details/C101697894/page/n257","Kearny Street",null,null,"City College of San Francisco Chinatown/North Beach campus : comments and responses","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:15/8",1998,1998,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Airport ferry service initial plan · recommendation: start with the downtown San Francisco to SFO route, allowing transfers at the Ferry Building","unverified","C124909173",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n14",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:27/2",1998,1998,"","finding","study or report",null,"Ferry Building ferry terminal · finding: Ferry will be faster than BART from zones in and near downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124909173",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n26",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:27/6",1998,1998,"","finding","study or report",null,"Non-business travelers to SFO · other: Value of time for non-business travelers about half that of business travelers","unverified","C124909173",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n26",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:41/1",1998,1998,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Airport hovercraft service, downtown San Francisco to SFO · cost usd: about $560 per hour","unverified","C124909173",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n40",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:41/2",1998,1998,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Combined [name withheld] hovercraft operation · cost usd: about $489 per hour daily","unverified","C124909173",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n40",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:41/3",1998,1998,"","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco to Airport hovercraft route · finding: does not lose money; each other route loses money","unverified","C124909173",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n40",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:50/1",1998,1998,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown SF route · other: Sailing Time: 22 minutes","unverified","C124909173",50,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n49",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-3.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:50/2",1998,1998,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown SF route · other: Frequency: 20 min headways; Vessels Req: 3","unverified","C124909173",50,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n49",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:50/3",1998,1998,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown SF route · cost usd: [name withheld]: $7,500,000","unverified","C124909173",50,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n49",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:50/4",1998,1998,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown SF route · cost usd: [name withheld]: $18,240","unverified","C124909173",50,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n49",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:50/5",1998,1998,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown SF route · other: Passengers: 3600; Fare: $10","unverified","C124909173",50,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n49",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:50/6",1998,1998,"","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown SF route · other: Passenger Rev: $36,000","unverified","C124909173",50,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n49",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:53/1",1998,1998,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"SFO off-site cargo facilities · recommendation: Consider creating off-site cargo facilities on the downtown San Francisco waterfront","unverified","C124909173",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n52",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:64/4",1998,1998,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Initial hovercraft service · proposes: Downtown San Francisco to SFO, three trips hourly in each direction using a tug escort","unverified","C124909173",64,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n63",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:7/10001",1998,1998,"","site","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco ferry route · other: 3,200 to 3,800 passengers daily","unverified","C124909173",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n6",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:8/5",1998,1998,"","site","study or report",null,"Port property restaurant space · other: about $30 per square foot annually","unverified","C124909173",8,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n7",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915258:241/8",1998,1998,"","project","environmental impact report",null,"Downtown San Francisco Caltrain extension · cost usd: Estimated at $650 million; Draft EIR not completed","unverified","C124915258",241,"https://archive.org/details/C124915258/page/n240",null,null,null,"Draft environmental impact statement/draft environmental impact report for the Third Street light rail project in the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915258:25/6",1998,1998,"","project","environmental impact report",null,"Downtown Subway · other: Third Street Light Rail Project would be key element in establishing a Downtown Subway","unverified","C124915258",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124915258/page/n24",null,null,null,"Draft environmental impact statement/draft environmental impact report for the Third Street light rail project in the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915258:63/4",1998,1998,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"15-Third, 9-San Bruno, 9X-San Bruno Express, 30-Stockton and 45-Union-Stockton bus lines · finding: Unreliable service south of Downtown due to traffic congestion","unverified","C124915258",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124915258/page/n62",null,null,null,"Draft environmental impact statement/draft environmental impact report for the Third Street light rail project in the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915258:77/1",1998,1998,"","alternative","environmental impact report",null,"Third Street Light Rail Project · alternative: Option 1: Market Street Subway","unverified","C124915258",77,"https://archive.org/details/C124915258/page/n76",null,null,null,"Draft environmental impact statement/draft environmental impact report for the Third Street light rail project in the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915258:77/2",1998,1998,"","alternative","environmental impact report",null,"Third Street Light Rail Project · alternative: Option 2: New Central Subway","unverified","C124915258",77,"https://archive.org/details/C124915258/page/n76",null,null,null,"Draft environmental impact statement/draft environmental impact report for the Third Street light rail project in the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915258:77/3",1998,1998,"","alternative","environmental impact report",null,"Third Street Light Rail Project · alternative: Option 3: [name withheld]","unverified","C124915258",77,"https://archive.org/details/C124915258/page/n76",null,null,null,"Draft environmental impact statement/draft environmental impact report for the Third Street light rail project in the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-5.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:10/5",1998,1998,"1998","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco airport ferry · other: at least 500 additional daily passengers if reasonable transfer rate assumed","unverified","C124909173",10,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n9",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:10/6",1998,1998,"1998","finding","study or report",null,"Airport Ferry Service · other: additional fares of $5,000 daily from 500 additional passengers","unverified","C124909173",10,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n9",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:11/1",1998,1998,"1998","finding","study or report",null,"Airport Ferry Project · finding: market demand for amphibious ferry service between downtown San Francisco and SFO","unverified","C124909173",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n10",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:11/5",1998,1998,"1998","finding","study or report",null,"Airport Ferry Project · finding: environmental issues include noise issues in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124909173",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n10",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:24/1",1998,1998,"1998","alternative","study or report",null,"Ferry Building ferry terminal · cost usd: $10 fare modeled from the Ferry Building","unverified","C124909173",24,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n23",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:24/2",1998,1998,"1998","alternative","study or report",null,"Ferry Building ferry terminal · other: no parking","unverified","C124909173",24,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n23",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:24/3",1998,1998,"1998","finding","study or report",null,"Ferry Building ferry terminal · other: ridership is 4 to 5 times the ridership of the site with the next highest ridership","unverified","C124909173",24,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n23",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:26/3",1998,1998,"1998","finding","study or report",null,"Ferry Building ferry terminal · other: ferry significantly faster than BART from downtown San Francisco zones; about 15 minutes time difference","unverified","C124909173",26,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n25",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-2.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:49/1",1998,1998,"1998","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco ferry route · finding: Candidate route for water transit to SFO; only downtown San Francisco and Moffett Field should be considered","unverified","C124909173",49,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n48",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:49/2",1998,1998,"1998","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco ferry route · finding: Profitable operation even after paying for vessels; costed assuming no other service, with higher hourly operating cost","unverified","C124909173",49,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n48",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:5/1",1998,1998,"1998","alternative","study or report",null,"Airport ferry study 1998 · alternative: Water transit route between the airport and Downtown San Francisco studied","unverified","C124909173",5,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n4",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:52/1",1998,1998,"1998","finding","study or report",null,"Airport ferry study - domestic air cargo between downtown San Francisco and SFO · finding: 75 to 150 metric tons daily","unverified","C124909173",52,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n51",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:52/2",1998,1998,"1998","recommendation","study or report",null,"SFO port-pair site · proposes: downtown San Francisco waterfront location as port-pair site with SFO","unverified","C124909173",52,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n51",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:54/1",1998,1998,"1998","finding","study or report",null,"hovercraft service between downtown San Francisco and Moffett Field to SFO · finding: viable service and profitable","unverified","C124909173",54,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n53",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:54/3",1998,1998,"1998","recommendation","study or report",null,"hovercraft service between downtown San Francisco and Moffett Field to SFO · recommendation: operate 16 to 17 hours daily every 20 minutes","unverified","C124909173",54,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n53",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-3.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:6/1",1998,1998,"1998","finding","study or report",null,"Airport ferry study 1998 · finding: Only two routes, Downtown San Francisco and Moffett Field, have potential to generate a profit, both via amphibious hovercraft","unverified","C124909173",6,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n5",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:6/2",1998,1998,"1998","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco ferry route · cost usd: Est. operating cost $8,100,000 annual ($27,000 daily)","unverified","C124909173",6,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n5",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:6/3",1998,1998,"1998","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco ferry route · other: Estimated annual profit $2,929,500 ($9,765 daily)","unverified","C124909173",6,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n5",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:6/4",1998,1998,"1998","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco ferry route · other: Estimated annual passengers 1,102,950 (3,675 daily)","unverified","C124909173",6,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n5",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:6/5",1998,1998,"1998","measure","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco and Moffett Field ferry route · cost usd: Est. operating cost $15,900,000 annual ($53,000 daily)","unverified","C124909173",6,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n5",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:6/6",1998,1998,"1998","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco and Moffett Field ferry route · other: Estimated annual profit $1,176,075 ($3,920 daily)","unverified","C124909173",6,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n5",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:63/1",1998,1998,"1998","finding","study or report",null,"Amphibious hovercraft service between downtown San Francisco and SFO · finding: There is market demand for a fast waterborne shuttle service between the Airport and downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124909173",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n62",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:63/2",1998,1998,"1998","measure","study or report",null,"Amphibious hovercraft service between downtown San Francisco and SFO · other: Estimated daily passengers between downtown San Francisco and SFO: 3,675","unverified","C124909173",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n62",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:63/3",1998,1998,"1998","finding","study or report",null,"Amphibious hovercraft service between downtown San Francisco and SFO · finding: The operation between the Airport and downtown San Francisco would be profitable","unverified","C124909173",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n62",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:63/4",1998,1998,"1998","measure","study or report",null,"Amphibious hovercraft service between downtown San Francisco and SFO · cost usd: [name withheld] $27,000 daily","unverified","C124909173",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n62",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:63/5",1998,1998,"1998","measure","study or report",null,"Amphibious hovercraft service between downtown San Francisco and SFO · other: Est. fare revenue $36,765 daily, profit $9,765 daily","unverified","C124909173",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n62",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:7/1",1998,1998,"1998","project","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco ferry route · other: operates from the Agriculture Building at the foot of Mission Street","unverified","C124909173",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n6","Mission Street",null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:7/2",1998,1998,"1998","project","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco ferry route · other: 3,200 to 3,800 passengers daily (estimated)","unverified","C124909173",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n6",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:7/3",1998,1998,"1998","project","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco ferry route · other: about 16 percent market share (modal split) of downtown-Airport air passengers","unverified","C124909173",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n6",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:7/4",1998,1998,"1998","project","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco ferry route · other: service every 20 minutes, 16 hours daily, by amphibious hovercraft","unverified","C124909173",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n6",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-3.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:7/5",1998,1998,"1998","project","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco ferry route · cost usd: vessel capital costs about $30 million","unverified","C124909173",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n6",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:7/6",1998,1998,"1998","project","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco ferry route · cost usd: total fully allocated costs about $567 per operating hour","unverified","C124909173",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n6",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:7/7",1998,1998,"1998","project","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco ferry route · cost usd: total costs about $27,000 daily","unverified","C124909173",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n6",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909173:7/8",1998,1998,"1998","project","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco ferry route · other: total passenger revenue about $36,000 daily","unverified","C124909173",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124909173/page/n6",null,null,null,"Airport ferry study 1998 : a feasibility study of water transit service to San Francisco International Airport","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915258:75/7",1998,1998,"April 1995","finding","environmental impact report",null,"Geary Corridor System Planning Study · finding: viability of a Third Street Central Subway in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124915258",75,"https://archive.org/details/C124915258/page/n74","Third Street",null,null,"Draft environmental impact statement/draft environmental impact report for the Third Street light rail project in the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915258:162/3",1998,1998,"March 1997","event","environmental impact report",null,"Caltrain San Francisco Downtown Extension Project · other: DEIS/DEIR published","unverified","C124915258",162,"https://archive.org/details/C124915258/page/n161",null,null,null,"Draft environmental impact statement/draft environmental impact report for the Third Street light rail project in the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich:122/2",1999,1999,null,"resolution","transit","referred","Resolution supporting a high speed rail line from [name withheld] to downtown San Francisco was referred to committee.","quoted","journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich",122,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich/page/n121",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich:143/1",1999,1999,null,"resolution","transit","passed","Resolution supports a high-speed rail line linking [name withheld] and downtown San Francisco via [name withheld] and San Mateo Counties.","quoted","journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich",143,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich/page/n142",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.28],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalaprjuneofproceed94sanfrich|g1492",1999,1999,"1999-06-28",null,"works","pending","Historic gold-line walking route plan sent back to committee.","unverified","journalaprjuneofproceed94sanfrich",422,"https://archive.org/details/journalaprjuneofproceed94sanfrich/page/n421",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922708:135/9",2000,2000,"","project","plan",null,"Caltrain Downtown Extension · cost usd: approximately $620 million","unverified","C124922708",135,"https://archive.org/details/C124922708/page/n134",null,null,null,"San Francisco countywide transportation plan : draft for public review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922708:137/5",2000,2000,"","project","plan",null,"California High Speed Rail · proposes: high speed rail service to downtown San Francisco using the Caltrain alignment","unverified","C124922708",137,"https://archive.org/details/C124922708/page/n136",null,null,null,"San Francisco countywide transportation plan : draft for public review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124923818:44/1",2000,2000,"","site","plan",null,"San Francisco Bay Trail · other: passes through highly urbanized areas like downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124923818",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124923818/page/n43",null,null,null,"Bay area transportation blueprint for the 21st century. Project notebook of candidate projects","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:28/1",2000,2000,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Alternative C - Basic Bridge Railroad Passenger Service · alternative: electrified commuter rail and high speed trains through Transbay Terminal and over Bay Bridge","unverified","C124925065",28,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n27",null,null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925065:30/1",2000,2000,"","measure","study or report",null,"Bay Bridge rail alternative · proposes: high speed and commuter trains share the same tracks at conventional speeds from Fourth and Townsend to Transbay Terminal and over the Bay Bridge","unverified","C124925065",30,"https://archive.org/details/C124925065/page/n29","Fourth and Townsend Streets",null,null,"Bay Bridge rail feasibility study","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123305299:66/1",1985,2000,"2000","measure","study or report",null,"HSWT catamaran service from Pittsburg, Martinez and Benicia · other: 500 daily commuters in 2000 (250 in 1980)","unverified","C123305299",66,"https://archive.org/details/C123305299/page/n65",null,null,null,"High speed water transit study for the San Francisco Bay Area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:107/4",1984,2000,"2000","finding","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown · jobs: employment may grow by as much as 90,000 jobs by 2000","unverified","C124887761",107,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n106",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:111/1",1984,2000,"2000","measure","ordinance or legislation",null,"Downtown Plan commuter transit goal · other: increase downtown commuter transit share to 70% from existing 64%","unverified","C124887761",111,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n110",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922708:127/2",2000,2000,"2000","project","plan",null,"Caltrain expansion and downtown extension · proposes: Caltrain expansion, station improvements, electrification and downtown extension","unverified","C124922708",127,"https://archive.org/details/C124922708/page/n126",null,null,null,"San Francisco countywide transportation plan : draft for public review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124923818:300/4",2000,2000,"2000","project","plan",null,"Caltrain San Francisco Downtown Extension · proposes: Caltrain San Francisco Downtown Extension","unverified","C124923818",300,"https://archive.org/details/C124923818/page/n299",null,null,null,"Bay area transportation blueprint for the 21st century. Project notebook of candidate projects","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:113/4",1979,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown housing · population: 30,000 more Downtown employees living in San Francisco by 2000","unverified","C124924016",113,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n112",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:125/3",1979,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco peak 8-hour street traffic · other: projected traffic increase of 50 percent and average speeds reduced to 5 mph by 2000","unverified","C124924016",125,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n124",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:125/5",1979,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco carbon monoxide levels · finding: carbon monoxide levels are likely to increase in the Downtown between the present and 2000","unverified","C124924016",125,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n124",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:129/2",1979,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown water system · finding: Existing supply system can handle increased demand; system has excellent four-day reserve capacity","unverified","C124924016",129,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n128",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:129/3",1979,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown sewer system · finding: Sewage flow increase of 65 percent would cause only a 2 to 3 percent increase in peak wet weather flow","unverified","C124924016",129,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n128",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924016:71/2",1979,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown transit services · other: transit capacity would have to increase drastically, probably by 50 to 100 percent","unverified","C124924016",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124924016/page/n70",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : phase I, reconnaissance and programming","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924113:3/2",1979,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · finding: commuter movement would increase 25 percent short-term (1985) and 60 percent long-term (2000)","unverified","C124924113",3,"https://archive.org/details/C124924113/page/n2",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : Phase 1 study : summary","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924113:3/6",1979,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown San Francisco · finding: carbon monoxide emissions would increase about 50 percent by the year 2000","unverified","C124924113",3,"https://archive.org/details/C124924113/page/n2",null,null,null,"Downtown San Francisco conservation and development planning program : Phase 1 study : summary","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:57/2",1979,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown office space projections · floor area sqft: between 10 and 25 million square feet added","unverified","C124924423",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n56",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924423:57/3",1979,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Downtown office space at current construction rate · floor area sqft: between 34 and 44 million square feet","unverified","C124924423",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124924423/page/n56",null,null,null,"Downtown growth management program, San Francisco, California","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:280/1",1983,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"Alternative 3 conversion forecast · other: about 10 percent more of existing space in each subarea would have been converted or demolished by 2000","unverified","c124896626",280,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n279",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:435/1",1983,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"C-3 District employees (downtown San Francisco) · other: Table J.4: residence locations of C-3 District employees traveling during the p.m. peak hour, Alternatives 1, 2 and 3, 2000 (percent)","unverified","c124896626",435,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n434",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:442/1",1983,2000,"2000","finding","study or report",null,"C-3 District employee modal split · other: Table J.11: P.M. peak-hour C-3 district primary work trips by place of residence, modal split for 2000, including the Downtown/Northeast and San Francisco (Areas 14,15) subareas","unverified","c124896626",442,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n441",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2000sanf_0:61/4",2000,2000,"2000-05-08","resolution","transit","referred","Resolution urges [name withheld] to fund extending Caltrain to downtown San Francisco in his proposed budget; referred.","quoted","meetingminutesb2000sanf_0",61,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2000sanf_0/page/n60",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesmayaug95sanfrich:61/4",2000,2000,"2000-05-08","resolution","transit","referred","Supervisors urge [name withheld] to fund the Caltrain extension to downtown San Francisco in his budget; referred for adoption.","quoted","meetingminutesmayaug95sanfrich",61,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesmayaug95sanfrich/page/n60",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2000sanf_0:98/1",2000,2000,"2000-05-15","resolution","transit","passed","Resolution urging [name withheld] to fund extending Caltrain to downtown San Francisco was adopted as amended.","quoted","meetingminutesb2000sanf_0",98,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2000sanf_0/page/n97",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.28],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesmayaug95sanfrich:98/1",2000,2000,"2000-05-15","resolution","transit","passed","Resolution urging [name withheld] to fund extending Caltrain to downtown San Francisco was adopted as amended.","quoted","meetingminutesmayaug95sanfrich",98,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesmayaug95sanfrich/page/n97",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.4],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingseptdecminutes95sanfrich:335/5",2000,2000,"2000-12-04","resolution","transit","referred","Supervisor Newsom urges the Municipal Transportation Agency to link downtown San Francisco and the Presidio by transit; assigned to committee.","quoted","meetingseptdecminutes95sanfrich",335,"https://archive.org/details/meetingseptdecminutes95sanfrich/page/n330",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922531:30/5",2000,2000,"December 17, 1998","event","environmental impact report",null,"Hunters Point Shipyard Revised Draft EIS/EIR · event: Second public hearing held jointly by San Francisco Planning Commission and Redevelopment Agency Commission in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124922531",30,"https://archive.org/details/C124922531/page/n29",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact statement for the disposal and reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922531:55/9",2000,2000,"December 17, 1998","event","environmental impact report",null,"Hunters Point Shipyard Revised Draft EIS/EIR · event: second public hearing held jointly by San Francisco Planning Commission and Redevelopment Agency Commission in downtown San Francisco","unverified","C124922531",55,"https://archive.org/details/C124922531/page/n54",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact statement for the disposal and reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:180/1",2001,2001,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"BAAQMD air quality monitoring stations · other: two monitoring stations in San Francisco, one near Potrero Hill and one downtown","unverified","C124925126",180,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n179",null,null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:135/5",2002,2002,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"I-80 mainline between NSTI and San Francisco · other: AM peak westbound travel speed approximately 35 mph, indicating congested conditions","unverified","C101747471",135,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n134","I-80",null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:282/3",2002,2002,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"Downtown San Francisco parking supply · other: approximately 16,500 off-street parking spaces, weekday","unverified","C101747471",282,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n281","Bryant Street",null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:280/1",2002,2002,"2002","measure","environmental impact report",null,"Ferry Building ferry person-trips, Alternative 1 (weekday daily total) · other: 13,950 weekday daily ferry person-trips (Downtown San Francisco/Ferry Building, total)","unverified","C101747471",280,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n279",null,null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2002sanf_1:104/6",2002,2002,"2002-10-07","resolution","housing","referred","Resolution commending the Tenderloin Neighborhood Development Corporation for affordable housing in downtown San Francisco was referred.","quoted","meetingminutesb2002sanf_1",104,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2002sanf_1/page/n103",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:63/2",1995,2005,"2005","project","study or report",null,"Peninsula Commute Service San Francisco Downtown Station Relocation Study · other: Northbound ridership to Downtown projected to nearly double by 2005 under the three extension alternatives","unverified","C124914193",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n63",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:63/3",1995,2005,"2005","project","study or report",null,"Peninsula Commute Service San Francisco Downtown Station Relocation Study · other: Southbound ridership to the Peninsula projected to nearly triple by 2005 under the three extension alternatives","unverified","C124914193",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n63",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesdr2006sanf:165/1",2006,2006,"2006-03-14","ordinance","whats-being-built","vetoed","Mayor vetoed File 051453, which would have changed parking requirements in downtown San Francisco; the Board will consider the veto March 21.","quoted","meetingminutesdr2006sanf",165,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesdr2006sanf/page/n164",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.19],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/p16255coll1_H1371674965007_file2:56/1",2009,2009,"","measure","plan",null,"[name withheld] Assessment · proposes: Apply the current transportation impact fee to all downtown commercial space that benefits from transit","unverified","p16255coll1_H1371674965007_file2",56,"https://archive.org/details/p16255coll1_H1371674965007_file2/page/n56",null,null,null,"Climate action plan for San Francisco local actions to reduce greenhouse emissions","n","a",0,-5.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:291/2",2002,2010,"2010","measure","environmental impact report",null,"SFOBB/I-80 eastbound access, No Action Alternative · other: eastbound vehicles accessing SFOBB/I-80 restricted to approximately 9,500 vph during AM and PM peaks","unverified","C101747471",291,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n290","I-80",null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101747471:292/5",2002,2010,"2010","finding","environmental impact report",null,"SFOBB/I-80 downtown San Francisco approach, No Action Alternative · finding: existing constraint at the downtown San Francisco approach would continue to restrict traffic and exacerbate queuing","unverified","C101747471",292,"https://archive.org/details/C101747471/page/n291","SFOBB/I-80",null,null,"Disposal and reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914713:50/3",1993,2010,"2010","finding","study or report",null,"AC Transit transbay bus service · other: AC Transit would need to carry about 6,125 westbound transbay passengers in the am peak hour, 112% more than today","unverified","C124914713",50,"https://archive.org/details/C124914713/page/n49","Bay Bridge",null,null,"Transbay Transit Terminal current and future needs study : staff working paper : final","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag070224|67",2024,2024,"2024-07-02","resolution","city-services",null,"$189,558 (≈ $203,608 in 2026 dollars) federal grant for earthquake safety planning sent to committee","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag070224_minutes.pdf#page=18",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag073024|48",2024,2024,"2024-07-30","resolution","city-services",null,"$189,558 (≈ $203,608 in 2026 dollars) FEMA grant sought for downtown earthquake risk guidance","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag073024_minutes.pdf#page=13",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag073024|49",2024,2024,"2024-07-30","resolution","running-the-city","passed","$189,558 (≈ $203,608 in 2026 dollars) federal grant accepted for downtown quake-risk guidance","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag073024_minutes.pdf#page=13",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,2.39]]}