{"id":null,"ids":[],"kind":"named in documents","name":"Doyle Drive","tied_by":"name","block":null,"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124923818:263/2",2000,1936,"1936","property_record","plan",null,"[name withheld] viaduct · built year: 1936","unverified","C124923818",263,"https://archive.org/details/C124923818/page/n262","[name withheld]",null,null,"Bay area transportation blueprint for the 21st century. Project notebook of candidate projects","n","a",0,2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich:102/1",1973,1973,"1973-01-29","resolution",null,"continued","Supervisors temporarily postponed a resolution urging state and federal authorities to rebuild the [name withheld] approach to the Golden Gate Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed68sanfrich",102,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n102",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|15",1973,1973,"1973-01-29","resolution","civic-life","passed","State and federal authorities asked to rebuild [name withheld]","quoted","journalofproceed68sanfrich",104,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n104",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.26],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|g321",1973,1973,"1973-01-29",null,"transport","pending","Request to rebuild [name withheld] approach held over for changes.","unverified","journalofproceed68sanfrich",102,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n102",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|g325",1973,1973,"1973-01-29",null,"transport","passed","Petition urging state and federal rebuild of [name withheld] approved","unverified","journalofproceed68sanfrich",105,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n105",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-0.97],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|33",1973,1973,"1973-02-20","resolution","civic-life",null,"California Highway Commission asked to widen and divide [name withheld]","quoted","journalofproceed68sanfrich",168,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n168",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|72",1973,1973,"1973-03-05","resolution","civic-life","passed","Opposition proposed to state bills adding lanes on [name withheld]","quoted","journalofproceed68sanfrich",233,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n233",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.76],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|g807",1973,1973,"1973-03-05",null,"transport","pending","Opposition to widening [name withheld] sent to state committee.","unverified","journalofproceed68sanfrich",233,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n233",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|76",1973,1973,"1973-03-12","resolution","civic-life",null,"State asked for emergency safety work on [name withheld]","quoted","journalofproceed68sanfrich",251,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n251",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|77",1973,1973,"1973-03-12","resolution","the-street",null,"[name withheld] measure amended to drop widening and cut speeds","unverified","journalofproceed68sanfrich",251,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n251",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.97],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|79",1973,1973,"1973-03-12","resolution","civic-life","continued","State bills urged to widen [name withheld] to eight lanes","quoted","journalofproceed68sanfrich",261,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n261",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|84",1973,1973,"1973-03-12","resolution","civic-life","referred","Headlights urged for all drivers on [name withheld]","quoted","journalofproceed68sanfrich",266,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n266",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|g889",1973,1973,"1973-03-12",null,"transport","pending","Support for widening [name withheld] postponed to March 19.","unverified","journalofproceed68sanfrich",261,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n261",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|88",1973,1973,"1973-03-19","resolution","civic-life","tabled","State bills urged to widen [name withheld] to eight lanes","quoted","journalofproceed68sanfrich",283,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n283",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|94",1973,1973,"1973-03-19","resolution","civic-life","referred","Bus-only lanes asked for on a rebuilt [name withheld]","quoted","journalofproceed68sanfrich",299,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n299",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|g1048",1973,1973,"1973-03-19","resolution","transport","pending","[name withheld] repairs and bus lanes requested; sent to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed68sanfrich",299,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n299",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich:399/2",1973,1973,"1973-04-16","resolution",null,"tabled","Resolution opposing added lanes on [name withheld] was tabled after SB 147 was amended to match the Board's original position.","quoted","journalofproceed68sanfrich",399,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n399",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|124",1973,1973,"1973-04-16","resolution","civic-life","tabled","Opposition proposed to state bills adding lanes on [name withheld]","quoted","journalofproceed68sanfrich",398,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n398",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|g1410",1973,1973,"1973-04-16",null,"transport","pending","City opposition to more [name withheld] lanes set aside.","unverified","journalofproceed68sanfrich",398,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n398",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|180",1973,1973,"1973-05-29","resolution","civic-life","passed","Headlights urged for all drivers on [name withheld]","quoted","journalofproceed68sanfrich",567,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n567",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.79],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|g1879",1973,1973,"1973-05-29",null,"traffic","passed","City urges state to improve [name withheld] and require headlights","unverified","journalofproceed68sanfrich",567,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n567",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.01],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich:970/1",1973,1973,"1973-09-04","motion","transit","pending","Molinari asked the City Attorney to write to the State about [name withheld] widening, which the city's policy limits to six lanes.","quoted","journalofproceed68sanfrich",970,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n970",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich:1063/1",1973,1973,"1973-09-24","resolution",null,"passed","Board adopted a resolution urging the Interior Department to hold hearings on widening [name withheld].","quoted","journalofproceed68sanfrich",1063,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n1063",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|394",1973,1973,"1973-09-24","resolution","civic-life","passed","Interior Department urged to hold [name withheld] hearings here","quoted","journalofproceed68sanfrich",1062,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n1062",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.51],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich:1128/4",1973,1973,"1973-10-09","other",null,null,"Molinari's request for City Attorney answers on the Presidio land deed for [name withheld] widening was granted.","quoted","journalofproceed68sanfrich",1128,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n1128",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|435",1973,1973,"1973-10-15","resolution","getting-around","passed","Public Works told to state city's [name withheld] widening stance","unverified","journalofproceed68sanfrich",1166,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n1166",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.97],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich:1212/1",1973,1973,"1973-10-29","resolution",null,"passed","Board adopted an amended resolution rejecting the [name withheld] expansion environmental impact statement as inadequate and opposing State Highway Commission decisions.","quoted","journalofproceed68sanfrich",1212,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n1212",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|450",1973,1973,"1973-10-29","resolution","land-and-building","passed","[name withheld] expansion study rejected as inadequate","quoted","journalofproceed68sanfrich",1211,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n1211",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.97],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed68sanfrich|g3989",1973,1973,"1973-10-29",null,"transport","passed","[name withheld] widening study called inadequate; vote not shown.","unverified","journalofproceed68sanfrich",1211,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed68sanfrich/page/n1211",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed69sanfrich|37",1974,1974,"1974-01-28","resolution","civic-life","referred","Passage of SB 147 urged for [name withheld] improvements","quoted","journalofproceed69sanfrich",129,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed69sanfrich/page/n128",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed69sanfrich|g414",1974,1974,"1974-01-28",null,"transport","passed","Supervisors urge state to improve [name withheld] approach","unverified","journalofproceed69sanfrich",129,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed69sanfrich/page/n128",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.97],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed69sanfrich|441",1974,1974,"1974-10-15","resolution","civic-life","referred","State asked to rebuild [name withheld] in a specified way","quoted","journalofproceed69sanfrich",1267,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed69sanfrich/page/n1258",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich:570/1",1975,1975,"1975-05-19","resolution",null,"passed","Resolution urging redesign of [name withheld] and interim traffic safety measures was adopted and the Bridge District asked to limit lanes.","quoted","journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich",570,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich/page/n567",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich|197",1975,1975,"1975-06-09","resolution","civic-life","passed","Department of Transportation urged to redesign [name withheld] with a barrier","quoted","journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich",569,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich/page/n566",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.26],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich|231",1975,1975,"1975-06-09","resolution","public-money","passed","City Attorney to join the Marin County lawsuit over [name withheld]","quoted","journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich",700,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich/page/n697",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.61],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich|g2448",1975,1975,"1975-06-09",null,"transport","passed","City joins Marin County court case over [name withheld]","unverified","journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich",700,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich/page/n697",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.03],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich:737/4",1975,1975,"1975-06-16","resolution",null,"referred","A resolution to close [name withheld] access from Park Presidio Drive in morning peak hours was referred to committee.","quoted","journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich",737,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich/page/n734",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich|237",1975,1975,"1975-06-16","resolution","getting-around","referred","Morning closure of Park Presidio access to [name withheld] proposed","unverified","journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich",737,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich/page/n734",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich|g2570",1975,1975,"1975-06-16",null,"traffic","pending","Plan to close Park Presidio entrance to [name withheld] mornings; in committee.","unverified","journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich",737,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed70sanfrich/page/n734",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjulydecproceed70sanfrich:369/4",1975,1975,"1975-09-15","motion","transit","referred","Supervisor Molinari asked the Streets and Transportation Committee to hear [name withheld] proposed median barrier on [name withheld] on September 25, 1975.","quoted","journalofjulydecproceed70sanfrich",369,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjulydecproceed70sanfrich/page/n369",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich:507/1",1977,1977,"1977-05-23","resolution",null,"passed","Traffic regulations to improve the peripheral route between Bay Street and [name withheld] were adopted.","quoted","journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich",507,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich/page/n506",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.62],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich|184",1977,1977,"1977-05-23","resolution","getting-around","passed","Traffic changes proposed between Bay Street and [name withheld]","quoted","journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich",506,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich/page/n505",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.37],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed73sanfrich:220/1",1978,1978,"1978-02-21","other",null,"referred","Hearing on traffic problems at the [name withheld] exit at Lyon Street and Marina Boulevard referred to committee.","quoted","journaljanjuneofproceed73sanfrich",220,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed73sanfrich/page/n220",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889033:41/5",1982,1982,"","finding","study or report",null,"Golden Gate Bridge toll plaza · finding: increased difficulty for [name withheld] vehicles exiting to Lincoln Boulevard","unverified","C124889033",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124889033/page/n40","[name withheld]",null,null,"Golden Gate Bridge toll plaza masterplan study","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889033:43/2",1982,1982,"","finding","study or report",null,"[name withheld] approach · finding: Combined storage of the four-lane [name withheld] approach and 19th Avenue ramp approximately equals southbound storage from toll plaza to end of Marin Approach","unverified","C124889033",43,"https://archive.org/details/C124889033/page/n42","[name withheld]",null,null,"Golden Gate Bridge toll plaza masterplan study","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889033:71/3",1982,1982,"1982","finding","study or report",null,"[name withheld] and 19th Avenue connection · finding: Limited storage capacity may create tie-ups of City streets, especially on weekends and holidays","unverified","C124889033",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124889033/page/n70","[name withheld]",null,null,"Golden Gate Bridge toll plaza masterplan study","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889033:83/3",1982,1982,"1982","site","study or report",null,"Golden Gate Bridge toll plaza · other: immediate exit into Merchant Road; short merge into [name withheld] and 19th Avenue","unverified","C124889033",83,"https://archive.org/details/C124889033/page/n82","Merchant Road",null,null,"Golden Gate Bridge toll plaza masterplan study","n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed77sanfrich|183",1982,1982,"1982-03-29","resolution","the-street","passed","Federal money sought for walking and traffic work toward [name withheld]","quoted","journalofjanjuneproceed77sanfrich",397,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed77sanfrich/page/n396",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.34],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889033:31/7",1982,1982,"several years ago","alternative","study or report",null,"[name withheld] widening · alternative: Caltrans widening plan, four fixed lanes in each direction, shelved","unverified","C124889033",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124889033/page/n30","[name withheld]",null,null,"Golden Gate Bridge toll plaza masterplan study","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich:658/4",1984,1984,"1984-05-29","other",null,"referred","A request to examine safety problems on [name withheld] was referred to the Transportation and Traffic Committee.","quoted","journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich",658,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed79sanfrich/page/n655",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124879916:35/2",1985,1985,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Trafficways from Howard Street to [name withheld] · recommendation: Any new trafficways on unspecified alignment must make no reduction in quality or quantity of recreation and open space","unverified","C124879916",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124879916/page/n34","Howard Street",null,null,"Recreation and open space element of the master plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich|115",1985,1985,"1985-02-19","resolution","running-the-city",null,"Amendment strikes the [name withheld] reconstruction from the resolution","unverified","journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich",220,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich/page/n209",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich:467/6",1985,1985,"1985-04-08","motion",null,"referred","A request asking Caltrans to propose safer [name withheld] measures without adding vehicle capacity was referred to Transportation and Traffic Committee.","quoted","journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich",467,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich/page/n454",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich|122",1985,1985,"1985-08-19","resolution","getting-around","referred","The state asked for ways to make [name withheld] safer","quoted","journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich",262,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich/page/n261",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich:443/1",1985,1985,"1985-09-30","resolution",null,"continued","Board continued to October 28 a resolution asking Caltrans for recommendations to reduce fatalities on [name withheld].","quoted","journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich",443,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich/page/n442",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich|222",1985,1985,"1985-09-30","resolution","getting-around","continued","[name withheld] safety request called up for a September vote","quoted","journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich",409,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich/page/n408",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich|242",1985,1985,"1985-09-30","resolution","getting-around","continued","The state asked for ways to make [name withheld] safer","quoted","journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich",442,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich/page/n441",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich|276",1985,1985,"1985-11-04","resolution","getting-around","passed","The state asked for ways to make [name withheld] safer","quoted","journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich",530,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjulydecproceed80sanfrich/page/n529",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.84],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902698:114/1",1988,1988,"10/87","finding","plan",null,"Marina Viaduct ([name withheld]) · finding: Bridge access cut off by collapse of Marina Viaduct and soil failures at toll plaza","unverified","C124902698",114,"https://archive.org/details/C124902698/page/n113","[name withheld]",null,null,"City and county of San Francisco multi-hazard functional plan","n","a",0,1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed83sanfrich:54/10",1988,1988,"1988-05-09","hearing",null,"referred","Supervisor Silver proposed a task force on problems at the [name withheld] approach to the Golden Gate Bridge; referred to Public Works Committee.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed83sanfrich",54,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed83sanfrich/page/n54",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed83sanfrich|100",1988,1988,"1988-06-13","ordinance","running-the-city","referred","A [name withheld] task force proposed and sent to committee","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed83sanfrich",224,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed83sanfrich/page/n224",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed83sanfrich|193",1988,1988,"1988-07-25","ordinance","getting-around","passed first reading","A [name withheld] task force proposed for the road's renovation","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed83sanfrich",457,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed83sanfrich/page/n457",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.72],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed83sanfrich|199",1988,1988,"1988-08-01","ordinance","getting-around","passed","A [name withheld] task force proposed for the road's renovation","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed83sanfrich",487,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed83sanfrich/page/n487",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.72],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich:486/3",1991,1991,"1991-08-12","hearing",null,"referred","Supervisor Kennedy requested a hearing on widening, barriers and seismic safety for [name withheld], referred to committee.","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich",486,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich/page/n485",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich|47",1991,1991,"1991-09-23","resolution","getting-around","continued","[name withheld] of seventeen members proposed","quoted","journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich",110,"https://archive.org/details/journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich/page/n109",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich|91",1991,1991,"1991-10-15","resolution","getting-around","passed","[name withheld] report date pushed to October","quoted","journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich",199,"https://archive.org/details/journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich/page/n196",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.84],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich|196",1991,1991,"1991-11-25","resolution","running-the-city",null,"Transportation Authority seat added to the [name withheld]","unverified","journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich",390,"https://archive.org/details/journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich/page/n387",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.97],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich:423/1",1991,1991,"1991-12-09","resolution",null,"passed","The Board adopted a change adding a San Francisco Transportation Authority representative to the [name withheld].","quoted","journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich",423,"https://archive.org/details/journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich/page/n420",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich|212",1991,1991,"1991-12-30","resolution","getting-around","passed","Transport Authority joins [name withheld] safety task force","unverified","journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich",423,"https://archive.org/details/journalofseptoctproceed86sanfrich/page/n420",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.97],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich:30/6",1992,1992,"1992-01-06","resolution",null,"referred","Proposal to add a Spur representative to the [name withheld]; outcome continues on the next page.","quoted","journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich",30,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich/page/n30",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich|10",1992,1992,"1992-01-06","resolution","running-the-city","passed","A non-resident proposed for the [name withheld]","quoted","journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich",18,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich/page/n18",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.33],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich|25",1992,1992,"1992-01-06","resolution","getting-around",null,"[name withheld] to add a Spur representative; sent to committee, later adopted","unverified","journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich",30,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich/page/n30",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich|9",1992,1992,"1992-01-06","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Members proposed for the [name withheld]","quoted","journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich",18,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich/page/n18",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.45],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich:57/2",1992,1992,"1992-01-13","resolution",null,"passed","The Board adopted a resolution adding the Spur Presidio and Sierra Club representatives to the [name withheld], sponsored by Supervisor Kennedy.","quoted","journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich",57,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich/page/n57",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich|35",1992,1992,"1992-01-13","resolution","getting-around",null,"Spur and Sierra Club to join the [name withheld]","unverified","journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich",57,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich/page/n57",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.97],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich|70",1992,1992,"1992-02-03","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Bridge district member proposed for the [name withheld]","quoted","journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich",148,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich/page/n148",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.33],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich:214/1",1992,1992,"1992-02-18","resolution",null,"referred","Proposal to expand the [name withheld] duties to analyse realignment and its effect on the Presidio was referred to the Board.","quoted","journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich",214,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich/page/n214",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich|96",1992,1992,"1992-02-18","resolution","getting-around",null,"[name withheld] asked to study realignment proposals","unverified","journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich",214,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich/page/n214",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.97],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich:237/2",1992,1992,"1992-02-24","resolution",null,"passed","[name withheld] duties expanded to analyze realignment proposals and their effect on the Presidio.","quoted","journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich",237,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich/page/n237",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich|104",1992,1992,"1992-02-24","resolution","getting-around",null,"[name withheld] asked to study realignment proposals","unverified","journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich",237,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich/page/n237",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.97],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich:756/5",1992,1992,"1992-06-22","hearing",null,"referred","Supervisor Maher's request for hearings on alternatives to [name withheld] was referred to the Economic and Social Policy Committee.","quoted","journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich",756,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjunproceed87sanfrich/page/n756",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich|25",1993,1993,"1993-02-01","resolution","civic-life","referred","Rebuilding Doyle Drive urged on the state, sent to committee","quoted","journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich",118,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich/page/n117",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich|58",1993,1993,"1993-02-22","resolution","getting-around",null,"[name withheld] rebuilding urged on the state and regional agencies","quoted","journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich",206,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich/page/n205",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916766:59/4",1995,1995,"","recommendation","plan",null,"[name withheld] · recommendation: Design capacity no greater than three lanes in each direction","unverified","C124916766",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124916766/page/n58","[name withheld]",null,null,"Transportation : an element of the master plan of the city and county of San Francisco","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124918135:97/7",1995,1995,"","project","study or report",null,"[name withheld] · finding: long sought safety improvements are still not designed or funded; Caltrans retrofitting","unverified","C124918135",97,"https://archive.org/details/C124918135/page/n96",null,null,null,"Analysis of potential dedicated funding sources for the Municipal Railway (MUNI) : report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915258:163/4",1998,1998,"","site","environmental impact report",null,"Highway 101 · other: six-lane surface street between I-80 and the Golden Gate Bridge","unverified","C124915258",163,"https://archive.org/details/C124915258/page/n162","Van Ness Avenue, Lombard Street, [name withheld]",null,null,"Draft environmental impact statement/draft environmental impact report for the Third Street light rail project in the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909289:47/4",1998,1998,"1998","finding","study or report",null,"Golden Gate Bridge moveable median barrier · other: Barrier continuity with [name withheld] requires Caltrans concurrence","unverified","C124909289",47,"https://archive.org/details/C124909289/page/n46","[name withheld]",null,null,"Golden Gate Bridge moveable median barrier : authorize conceptual approval for installation of Barrier Systems, Inc. one foot wide moveable median barrier","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909289:57/1",1998,1998,"1998-02-24","site","study or report",null,"[name withheld] · other: only 60 feet wide","unverified","C124909289",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124909289/page/n56","[name withheld]",null,null,"Golden Gate Bridge moveable median barrier : authorize conceptual approval for installation of Barrier Systems, Inc. one foot wide moveable median barrier","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909289:57/3",1998,1998,"1998-02-24","recommendation","study or report",null,"[name withheld] moveable median barrier · proposes: Caltrans would propose a project to install a similar moveable median barrier on [name withheld] if GGBHTD installs one on the bridge","unverified","C124909289",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124909289/page/n56","[name withheld]",null,null,"Golden Gate Bridge moveable median barrier : authorize conceptual approval for installation of Barrier Systems, Inc. one foot wide moveable median barrier","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909289:57/4",1998,1998,"1998-02-24","finding","study or report",null,"[name withheld] structure widening project · other: may take several years of study before a barrier could be installed","unverified","C124909289",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124909289/page/n56","[name withheld]",null,null,"Golden Gate Bridge moveable median barrier : authorize conceptual approval for installation of Barrier Systems, Inc. one foot wide moveable median barrier","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909289:57/5",1998,1998,"1998-02-24","finding","study or report",null,"[name withheld] moveable median barrier · other: no definitive time frame can be given for installing a barrier on [name withheld]","unverified","C124909289",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124909289/page/n56","[name withheld]",null,null,"Golden Gate Bridge moveable median barrier : authorize conceptual approval for installation of Barrier Systems, Inc. one foot wide moveable median barrier","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909289:41/4",1998,1998,"February 24, 1998","project","study or report",null,"[name withheld] moveable median barrier · proposes: Caltrans would propose a similar moveable median barrier on [name withheld]","unverified","C124909289",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124909289/page/n40","[name withheld]",null,null,"Golden Gate Bridge moveable median barrier : authorize conceptual approval for installation of Barrier Systems, Inc. one foot wide moveable median barrier","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124909289:41/5",1998,1998,"February 24, 1998","finding","study or report",null,"[name withheld] · finding: installation predicated on widening of [name withheld] and its structures, with possibly several years of study","unverified","C124909289",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124909289/page/n40","[name withheld]",null,null,"Golden Gate Bridge moveable median barrier : authorize conceptual approval for installation of Barrier Systems, Inc. one foot wide moveable median barrier","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124923818:263/3",2000,1999,"1999","project","plan",null,"[name withheld] · cost usd: $220.2 million (1999$)","unverified","C124923818",263,"https://archive.org/details/C124923818/page/n262","[name withheld]",null,null,"Bay area transportation blueprint for the 21st century. Project notebook of candidate projects","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:184/12",2001,1999,"1999 and 2001","measure","environmental impact report",null,"Short-term noise measurement R14 · other: Hourly Leq 72.1 dBA; Lmax 73.8 dBA; dominant source Doyle/Highway 101","unverified","C124925126",184,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n183","106 Doyle Drive",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922708:95/4",2000,2000,"","project","plan",null,"[name withheld] · proposes: existing [name withheld] replaced with new roadway meeting current structural codes; no increase in vehicle capacity","unverified","C124922708",95,"https://archive.org/details/C124922708/page/n94","[name withheld]",null,null,"San Francisco countywide transportation plan : draft for public review","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124923818:263/1",2000,2000,"","project","plan",null,"[name withheld] · proposes: Replace existing [name withheld] viaduct with a surface-level expressway","unverified","C124923818",263,"https://archive.org/details/C124923818/page/n262","[name withheld]",null,null,"Bay area transportation blueprint for the 21st century. Project notebook of candidate projects","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124923818:263/4",2000,2000,"","agency","plan",null,"San Francisco County Transportation Authority · lead agency: Environmental analysis and preliminary engineering on a [name withheld] replacement, federally funded","unverified","C124923818",263,"https://archive.org/details/C124923818/page/n262","[name withheld]",null,null,"Bay area transportation blueprint for the 21st century. Project notebook of candidate projects","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124923818:263/5",2000,2000,"","finding","plan",null,"[name withheld] · other: Limited to not more than its current 6-lane configuration without approval from the San Francisco Board of Supervisors","unverified","C124923818",263,"https://archive.org/details/C124923818/page/n262","[name withheld]",null,null,"Bay area transportation blueprint for the 21st century. Project notebook of candidate projects","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:370/10",2001,2000,"2000","measure","environmental impact report",null,"Presidio Gateways traffic volume · other: 0 vehicles (Existing Conditions 2000, weekday p.m. peak hour), [name withheld]","unverified","C124925126",370,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n369","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:110/8",2001,2001,"","site","environmental impact report",null,"[name withheld] · other: [name withheld] reconstruction and improvements associated with the 23-acre LDA","unverified","C124925126",110,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n109","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:15/2",2001,2001,"","project","environmental impact report",null,"[name withheld] reconstruction · other: Trust is a Cooperating Agency in planning and reconstruction; [name withheld] runs through northern part of the park","unverified","C124925126",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n14","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:15/3",2001,2001,"","project","environmental impact report",null,"[name withheld] reconstruction · other: Could provide a direct entrance into the Presidio, reducing traffic through residential area gates","unverified","C124925126",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n14","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:183/2",2001,2001,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"Traffic noise near State Highway 1 and U.S. Highway 101 · other: existing traffic noise commonly above 67 dBA","unverified","C124925126",183,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n182","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:218/7",2001,2001,"","site","environmental impact report",null,"Pet Cemetery · use: Final resting place for pets of Army families","unverified","C124925126",218,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n217","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:228/1",2001,2001,"","site","environmental impact report",null,"Richardson Avenue · other: three lanes in each direction","unverified","C124925126",228,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n227","Richardson Avenue",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:234/4",2001,2001,"","site","environmental impact report",null,"Marina/Mason/Lyon/Doyle intersection · other: five approaches and two different types of control devices","unverified","C124925126",234,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n233","Marina Boulevard",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:238/5",2001,2001,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"Marina Boulevard/[name withheld] and Lyon Street intersection · other: controlled by semi-actuated traffic signal; operates well","unverified","C124925126",238,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n237","Marina Boulevard",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:306/5",2001,2001,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"Area B implementation plan wetlands · finding: NWI wetland near [name withheld] north of [name withheld] could be affected","unverified","C124925126",306,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n305","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:329/1",2001,2001,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"City residences on Marina Boulevard · finding: existing traffic noise levels approaching or exceeding FHWA NAC","unverified","C124925126",329,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n328","Marina Boulevard",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:331/4",2001,2001,"","recommendation","environmental impact report",null,"[name withheld] reconstruction · recommendation: additional analysis before initiating reconstruction of [name withheld]","unverified","C124925126",331,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n330","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:365/3",2001,2001,"","project","environmental impact report",null,"Doyle Drive Reconstruction Project · proposes: grade-separated interchange with [name withheld] providing access to the Presidio","unverified","C124925126",365,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n364","Girard Road",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:427/14",2001,2001,"","project","environmental impact report",null,"[name withheld] reconstruction · other: reconstruction and improvements","unverified","C124925126",427,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n426","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:433/1",2001,2001,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"Doyle Drive Reconstruction Project · finding: possible impacts to prehistoric and historic archaeological sites in the Crissy Field Planning District","unverified","C124925126",433,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n432",null,null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:435/1",2001,2001,"","project","environmental impact report",null,"[name withheld] tunnel · other: construction of a tunnel through the bluffs above [name withheld], identified as a potential action","unverified","C124925126",435,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n434",null,null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:435/2",2001,2001,"","agency","environmental impact report",null,"[name withheld] tunnel · lead agency: San Francisco County Transportation Authority, Caltrans and FHWA","unverified","C124925126",435,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n434","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:435/3",2001,2001,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"[name withheld] tunnel · finding: unavoidable adverse impact on the eastern segment of the bluffs, possibly changing hydrologic regime and wetland habitat","unverified","C124925126",435,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n434",null,null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:436/4",2001,2001,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"[name withheld] reconstruction · finding: could have a long-term adverse impact on biological resources","unverified","C124925126",436,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n435",null,null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:437/1",2001,2001,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"Doyle Drive Reconstruction Project · finding: could have an adverse effect on wetlands","unverified","C124925126",437,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n436","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:437/2",2001,2001,"","alternative","environmental impact report",null,"[name withheld] tunnel alternative · alternative: [name withheld] tunnel; could change the hydrologic regime and wetland features","unverified","C124925126",437,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n436","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:438/2",2001,2001,"","finding","environmental impact report",null,"[name withheld] reconstruction · finding: would generally improve views by placing portions of the roadway at or below ground level","unverified","C124925126",438,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n437","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:59/4",2001,2001,"","measure","environmental impact report",null,"[name withheld] improvements · proposes: replace [name withheld] with a facility that would have a new, direct entrance into the Presidio","unverified","C124925126",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n58","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:80/5",2001,2001,"","alternative","environmental impact report",null,"[name withheld] · proposes: reconstruction, which could require removal of existing recreational facilities","unverified","C124925126",80,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n79",null,null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925135:109/4",2001,2001,"","alternative","plan",null,"[name withheld] reconstruction · proposes: planned reconstruction could provide visual and physical reconnections between the Main Post and [name withheld]","unverified","C124925135",109,"https://archive.org/details/C124925135/page/n108","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust draft implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925135:112/2",2001,2001,"","recommendation","plan",null,"[name withheld] reconstruction · recommendation: Incorporate an open space and pedestrian connection between the Main Post and [name withheld] (Area B)","unverified","C124925135",112,"https://archive.org/details/C124925135/page/n111","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust draft implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925135:118/5",2001,2001,"","project","plan",null,"Main Post parade ground extension · proposes: Study of extending Main Post parade ground across reconstructed [name withheld] to [name withheld]","unverified","C124925135",118,"https://archive.org/details/C124925135/page/n117","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust draft implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco","n","a",0,1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925135:118/6",2001,2001,"","agency","plan",null,"[name withheld] project · lead agency: California Department of Transportation","unverified","C124925135",118,"https://archive.org/details/C124925135/page/n117","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust draft implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925135:118/8",2001,2001,"","finding","plan",null,"[name withheld] remnant natural features · recommendation: Natural dunes, serpentine, and riparian areas near [name withheld] to be protected and restored per Vegetation Management Plan","unverified","C124925135",118,"https://archive.org/details/C124925135/page/n117","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust draft implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925135:121/1",2001,2001,"","recommendation","plan",null,"[name withheld] · proposes: Reconstruct Doyle Drive to preserve views to and from the bluffs and Main Post","unverified","C124925135",121,"https://archive.org/details/C124925135/page/n120","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust draft implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925135:123/7",2001,2001,"","action","plan",null,"[name withheld] reconfiguration · proposes: New Presidio entrance at the Letterman district under Caltrans alternatives under consideration","unverified","C124925135",123,"https://archive.org/details/C124925135/page/n122",null,null,null,"Presidio Trust draft implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925135:127/1",2001,2001,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Letterman district (Area B) · recommendation: Ensure that a new entrance from [name withheld] serves as the primary vehicular entry for tenants and visitors to the western side of the Letterman complex","unverified","C124925135",127,"https://archive.org/details/C124925135/page/n126","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust draft implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925135:130/7",2001,2001,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Fort Scott pedestrian crossing at [name withheld] · proposes: Possible pedestrian crossing under or over reconstructed [name withheld]","unverified","C124925135",130,"https://archive.org/details/C124925135/page/n129","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust draft implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925135:133/4",2001,2001,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Fort Scott buffer along [name withheld] · recommendation: Maintain and enhance low trees and shrubs as a buffer against [name withheld]","unverified","C124925135",133,"https://archive.org/details/C124925135/page/n132","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust draft implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925135:15/4",2001,2001,"","project","plan",null,"Presidio Trust Implementation Plan (PTIP) Area B · proposes: [name withheld] reconfigured to provide direct vehicle access to the park and enhance views from the Main Post to [name withheld]","unverified","C124925135",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124925135/page/n14","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust draft implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925135:59/4",2001,2001,"","project","plan",null,"Reconfiguration of [name withheld] · proposes: reconfiguration of [name withheld] may require relocating recreation facilities","unverified","C124925135",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124925135/page/n58","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust draft implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925135:73/1",2001,2001,"","project","plan",null,"[name withheld] (Highway 101) replacement project · lead agency: San Francisco County Transportation Authority (SFCTA), with Caltrans","unverified","C124925135",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124925135/page/n72","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust draft implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925135:73/2",2001,2001,"","recommendation","plan",null,"[name withheld] replacement project · recommendation: Richardson Avenue/Lombard Street route should remain the designated Highway 101 corridor","unverified","C124925135",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124925135/page/n72","Richardson Avenue/Lombard Street",null,null,"Presidio Trust draft implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925135:73/3",2001,2001,"","recommendation","plan",null,"[name withheld] replacement project · recommendation: Viable connection for the [name withheld] drainage to [name withheld] (Area A) should be ensured","unverified","C124925135",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124925135/page/n72",null,null,null,"Presidio Trust draft implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925135:73/4",2001,2001,"","recommendation","plan",null,"[name withheld] replacement project · recommendation: Direct access into the Presidio should be integral to the redesign","unverified","C124925135",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124925135/page/n72",null,null,null,"Presidio Trust draft implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925135:73/5",2001,2001,"","recommendation","plan",null,"[name withheld] replacement project · recommendation: Access to the Main Post, Letterman, and [name withheld] districts should be maximized","unverified","C124925135",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124925135/page/n72",null,null,null,"Presidio Trust draft implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925135:73/6",2001,2001,"","recommendation","plan",null,"[name withheld] replacement project · recommendation: Reopen scenic vistas from Main Post, cemetery, and Cavalry Stables across [name withheld] to San Francisco Bay","unverified","C124925135",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124925135/page/n72",null,null,null,"Presidio Trust draft implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925135:73/7",2001,2001,"","project","plan",null,"[name withheld] intermodal transfer facility · proposes: Intermodal transfer facility associated with reconstructed highway, linking Golden Gate Transit, MUNI and the Trust's internal shuttle","unverified","C124925135",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124925135/page/n72","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust draft implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925278:7/3",2001,2001,"","project","plan",null,"Presidio Trust Implementation Plan (PTIP) · proposes: [name withheld] reconfigured to provide direct vehicle access to the park and enhance views from Main Post to [name withheld]","unverified","C124925278",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124925278/page/n6","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio trust draft implementation plan : executive summary","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:365/1",2001,2001,"fall 2001","project","environmental impact report",null,"Doyle Drive Reconstruction Project · event: publication of draft EIS/EIR planned for fall 2001","unverified","C124925126",365,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n364","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925126:365/2",2001,2001,"first quarter 2002","project","environmental impact report",null,"Doyle Drive Reconstruction Project · event: selection of a preferred alternative","unverified","C124925126",365,"https://archive.org/details/C124925126/page/n364","[name withheld]",null,null,"Presidio Trust implementation plan : an updated plan for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco : draft environmental impact statement","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101694865:48/2",2002,2002,"2002","measure","plan",null,"CO-10 Relocation or Replacement of Recreational Facilities (Presidio Trust Management Plan) · proposes: Relocate or replace recreational facilities in conjunction with reconfiguration of [name withheld]","unverified","C101694865",48,"https://archive.org/details/C101694865/page/n47","[name withheld]",null,null,"Record of decision : Presidio Trust management plan : land use policies for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco","n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2002sanf:297/3",2002,2002,"2002-03-25","resolution","transit","referred","Resolution supporting a $5 million (≈ $9.4 million in 2026 dollars) federal earmark for the Central Subway and $3 million (≈ $5.6 million in 2026 dollars) for [name withheld] urges the Bay Area congressional delegation to act; referred.","quoted","meetingminutesbo2002sanf",297,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2002sanf/page/n296",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesjanmay97sanfrich|199",2002,2002,"2002-03-25","resolution","civic-life","referred","Federal money urged for the Central Subway and [name withheld]","quoted","meetingminutesjanmay97sanfrich",297,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesjanmay97sanfrich/page/n296",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2002sanf:321/1",2002,2002,"2002-04-08","resolution","transit","passed","Resolution urges the Bay Area congressional delegation to secure $5 million (≈ $9.4 million in 2026 dollars) for Central Subway and $3 million (≈ $5.6 million in 2026 dollars) for [name withheld]; adopted.","quoted","meetingminutesbo2002sanf",321,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2002sanf/page/n320",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.98],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2002sanf|214",2002,2002,"2002-04-08","resolution","civic-life",null,"$5 million (≈ $9.4 million in 2026 dollars) urged for the Central Subway and [name withheld]","unverified","meetingminutesbo2002sanf",321,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2002sanf/page/n320",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesjanmay97sanfrich:321/1",2002,2002,"2002-04-08","resolution","transit","passed","Resolution urges Bay Area Congress members to secure $5M (≈ $9.4 million in 2026 dollars) federal earmark for Central Subway and $3M (≈ $5.6 million in 2026 dollars) for [name withheld].","quoted","meetingminutesjanmay97sanfrich",321,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesjanmay97sanfrich/page/n320",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.28],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2008sanf_2|221",2008,2008,"2008-12-09","resolution","getting-around",null,"Preferred plan for [name withheld] at the Golden Gate Bridge proposed","quoted","meetingminutesb2008sanf_2",552,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2008sanf_2/page/n551",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2008sanf_2|251",2008,2008,"2008-12-16","resolution","getting-around","passed","Preferred design for [name withheld], the Golden Gate Bridge approach, chosen","quoted","meetingminutesb2008sanf_2",635,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2008sanf_2/page/n634",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.92],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesd2008sanf_0:435/4",2008,2008,"2008-12-16","resolution","transit","passed","Board approved the preferred alternative for the Golden Gate Bridge south access at [name withheld].","quoted","meetingminutesd2008sanf_0",435,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesd2008sanf_0/page/n434",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.9],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesd2008sanf_0:440/4",2008,2008,"2008-12-16","resolution",null,"passed","The Board adopted the preferred alternative for the [name withheld] project, the south access to the Golden Gate Bridge.","quoted","meetingminutesd2008sanf_0",440,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesd2008sanf_0/page/n439",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/hand:presidio-parkway-2015",2015,2015,null,"other",null,null,"Presidio Parkway opened in 2015, replacing [name withheld]","unverified",null,null,"https://www.sfcta.org/projects/presidio-parkway","210 Lincoln Blvd",null,"hand",null,"n","a",0,-2.0]]}