{"id":null,"ids":[],"kind":"named in documents","name":"Dumbarton Bridge","tied_by":"name","block":null,"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1917sanfrich:70/2",1917,1917,"1917-01-15","communication",null,"referred","The Newark Chamber of Commerce urged San Francisco to send representatives to a meeting on a Dumbarton Bridge; referred to committee.","unverified","journalofproceed1917sanfrich",70,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1917sanfrich/page/n70",null,"Communication—From Newark Chamber of Commerce, urging that San Francisco send representatives to meeting of Chambers of Commerce",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1917sanfrich:71/1",1917,1917,"1917-01-15","communication","transit","referred","Newark Chamber of Commerce urged San Francisco to send representatives to a meeting on a Dumbarton Bridge; referred to committee.","unverified","journalofproceed1917sanfrich",71,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1917sanfrich/page/n71",null,"Communication— From Newark Chamber of Commerce, urging that San Francisco send representatives to meeting",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1920sanfrich:364/5",1920,1920,"1920-04-05","resolution",null,null,"The Board expressed willingness to co-operate with other counties and urge speedy action on building a Dumbarton bridge for automobile travel.","quoted","journalofproceed1920sanfrich",364,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1920sanfrich/page/n364",null,"Construction of Dumbarton Bridge. Supervisor Welch presented: Resolution No. 17806 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1922sanfrich:199/1",1922,1922,"1922-02-20","resolution",null,"referred","San Mateo County asked San Francisco to name a committee to confer on a Dumbarton Bridge across the Bay; referred to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed1922sanfrich",199,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1922sanfrich/page/n198",null,"Conference on Dumbarton Bridge. The following was presented, read and referred to Special Bridge Committee",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1922sanfrich:355/1",1922,1922,"1922-04-17","other","whats-being-built","referred","The Chamber of Commerce's letter urging completion of the Dumbarton Bridge was referred to the Special Bridge Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed1922sanfrich",355,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1922sanfrich/page/n354",null,"Chamber of Commerce expressing its approval and appreciation of recent action toward consummation of Dumbarton Bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1923sanfrich|1761",1923,1923,"1923-12-10","resolution","civic-life","passed","Board asks Mayor Rolph for a Dumbarton bridge committee","quoted","journalofproceed1923sanfrich",1395,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1923sanfrich/page/n1395",null,"Resolution No. 21873 (New Series), as follows: Whereas, Mayor George W. Mc- Nulty of Redwood City has appointed a citizens' Dumbarton bridge committee of Redwood City to effect the co-operation of all industries, business concerns and citizens of Redwood City in the building of Dumbarton bridge; and",null,null,"n","a",0,3.14],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1924sanfrich:1016/5",1924,1924,"1924-07-28","resolution","water-sewers","passed first reading","Resolution proposed authorizing payments to ten firms and individuals for Hetch Hetchy supplies and Dumbarton bridge work.","quoted","journalofproceed1924sanfrich",1016,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1924sanfrich/page/n1015",null,"Passed for Printing. The following matters were passed for printing: Authorizations. On motion of Supervisor McLeran: Resolution No. (New Series), as follows",null,null,"n","a",0,-0.26],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1924sanfrich:1154/1",1924,1924,"1924-08-25","resolution","libraries","passed","Board authorized dozens of payments to suppliers and contractors, including $112,486.21 (≈ $2.2 million in 2026 dollars) to Healy-Tibbitts for Dumbarton bridge work.","quoted","journalofproceed1924sanfrich",1154,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1924sanfrich/page/n1153",null,"Resolution No. 22815 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the following amounts be and the same are hereby authorized",null,null,"n","a",0,4.4],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1925sanfrich:796/3",1925,1925,"1925-05-25","other","water-sewers","referred","Spring Valley Water Company's proposed grant of rights of way to Dumbarton Bridge Company was referred to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed1925sanfrich",796,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1925sanfrich/page/n795",null,"Re Grants of Rights of Way From Spring Valley Water Company to Dumbarton Bridge Company.",null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1925sanfrich:1060/1",1925,1925,"1925-06-29","resolution","water-sewers","passed","Proposed city consent to Spring Valley Water Company granting road and drainage easements to Dumbarton Bridge Company for $100 (≈ $1,925 in 2026 dollars) per acre.","quoted","journalofproceed1925sanfrich",1060,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1925sanfrich/page/n1059",null,"City Consents to Elimination of Property From Spring Valley Option for Road to Connect Westerly Terminus of Dumbarton Bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1925sanfrich|1706",1925,1925,"1925-06-29","resolution","city-services",null,"Dumbarton Bridge Company to pay Spring Valley $100 (≈ $1,925 in 2026 dollars) an acre","unverified","journalofproceed1925sanfrich",1060,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1925sanfrich/page/n1059",null,"Resolution No. 24214 (New Series), as follows: Whereas, heretofore, on the 14th day of April, 1922, Spring Valley Water Company, a corporation, gave to the City and County of San Francisco an option to purchase certain properties of said Spring Valley Water Company; and Whereas, Dumbarton Bridge Com",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1925sanfrich:1359/2",1925,1925,"1925-08-31","resolution","water-sewers",null,"Proposed consent to Spring Valley Water Company granting Dumbarton Bridge Company road and drainage rights in San Mateo County.","quoted","journalofproceed1925sanfrich",1359,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1925sanfrich/page/n1358",null,"Consenting to Sale of Spring Valley Water Company Land Under Option to the Dumbarton Bridge",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed50sanfrich:306/5",1955,1955,"1955-05-02","ordinance",null,"continued","Exchange of easements with the State of California near the Dumbarton Bridge was continued one week.","quoted","journalofproceed50sanfrich",306,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed50sanfrich/page/n305",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed50sanfrich:319/4",1955,1955,"1955-05-09","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","The Board passed on first reading an ordinance exchanging easements with the State of California near the Dumbarton Bridge.","quoted","journalofproceed50sanfrich",319,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed50sanfrich/page/n318",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed50sanfrich:379/2",1955,1955,"1955-05-16","ordinance",null,"passed","Board finally passed an ordinance exchanging easements with the State of California near the Dumbarton Bridge for highway purposes.","quoted","journalofproceed50sanfrich",379,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed50sanfrich/page/n378",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.88],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123321093:342/10001",1977,1977,"","project","study or report",null,"Dumbarton Bridge · other: Category II in corridor teams' first version; later Category I by Bay revision","unverified","C123321093",342,"https://archive.org/details/C123321093/page/n341",null,null,null,"Political influence in transportation planning : the San Francisco Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission's regional transportation plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123321093:447/1",1977,1977,"","event","study or report",null,"MTC review process · other: Local officials, with state legislators, kept the Dumbarton Bridge project out of MTC's jurisdiction","unverified","C123321093",447,"https://archive.org/details/C123321093/page/n446",null,null,null,"Political influence in transportation planning : the San Francisco Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission's regional transportation plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123321093:314/10002",1977,1977,"June 13","action","study or report",null,"Dumbarton Bridge · recommendation: Changed from Category I to Category II","unverified","C123321093",314,"https://archive.org/details/C123321093/page/n313","Dumbarton Bridge",null,null,"Political influence in transportation planning : the San Francisco Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission's regional transportation plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123321093:343/2",1977,1977,"June 13, 1973","event","study or report",null,"Dumbarton Bridge · other: Commission voted 11-3 to consolidate the bridge issue and drop it to Category II","unverified","C123321093",343,"https://archive.org/details/C123321093/page/n342",null,null,null,"Political influence in transportation planning : the San Francisco Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission's regional transportation plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123321093:343/3",1977,1977,"June 20, 1973","event","study or report",null,"Dumbarton Bridge · other: Senator Homdahl protested the Category II action; Commission did not act on his request to restore Category I","unverified","C123321093",343,"https://archive.org/details/C123321093/page/n342",null,null,null,"Political influence in transportation planning : the San Francisco Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission's regional transportation plan","n","a",0,2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123321093:343/4",1977,1977,"October 24, 1973","event","study or report",null,"MIC report on Dumbarton Bridge alternatives · other: Report prepared under John Warren published October 24, 1973, detailing eight alternatives","unverified","C123321093",343,"https://archive.org/details/C123321093/page/n342",null,null,null,"Political influence in transportation planning : the San Francisco Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission's regional transportation plan","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919315:11/2",1997,1997,"","site","study or report",null,"State Route 101 Peninsula corridor segment · other: Key transportation corridor segment from San Francisco to Dumbarton Bridge; priority for pre-earthquake planning","unverified","C124919315",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124919315/page/n10","State Route 101",null,null,"Riding out future quakes : pre-earthquake planning for post-earthquake transportation system recovery in the San Francisco Bay region","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919315:121/2",1997,1997,"","finding","study or report",null,"State Route 101 Peninsula corridor · finding: one of nine highest-concentration key facility corridors for pre-earthquake planning",null,"C124919315",121,"https://archive.org/details/C124919315/page/n120","State Route 101",null,null,"Riding out future quakes : pre-earthquake planning for post-earthquake transportation system recovery in the San Francisco Bay region","n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutes95sanfrich:206/3",2000,2000,"2000-02-14","ordinance","water-sewers","referred","A $600,000 (≈ $1.2 million in 2026 dollars) Water Fund appropriation to clean up debris at PUC bayside property west of the Dumbarton Bridge was proposed.","quoted","meetingminutes95sanfrich",206,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutes95sanfrich/page/n203",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutes95sanfrich|g676",2000,2000,"2000-02-14",null,"property","pending","$600,000 (≈ $1.2 million in 2026 dollars) proposed to start cleaning contaminated land west of Dumbarton Bridge; sent to committee.","unverified","meetingminutes95sanfrich",206,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutes95sanfrich/page/n203",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutes95sanfrich:263/4",2000,2000,"2000-03-06","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Ordinance proposed to appropriate $600,000 (≈ $1.2 million in 2026 dollars) from the Water Fund to clean up debris on PUC bayside land west of the Dumbarton Bridge; passed first reading.","quoted","meetingminutes95sanfrich",263,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutes95sanfrich/page/n260",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.73],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutes95sanfrich:288/1",2000,2000,"2000-03-13","ordinance","water-sewers","passed","Ordinance passed appropriating $600,000 (≈ $1.2 million in 2026 dollars) from the Water Fund to clean up contaminated debris on PUC bayside property near Dumbarton Bridge.","quoted","meetingminutes95sanfrich",288,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutes95sanfrich/page/n285",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.09],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2000sanf:288/1",2000,2000,"2000-03-13","ordinance","water-sewers","passed","Board appropriated $600,000 (≈ $1.2 million in 2026 dollars) to clean up contaminated debris on the PUC bayside property west of the Dumbarton Bridge.","quoted","meetingminutesbo2000sanf",288,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2000sanf/page/n287",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.97]]}