{"id":null,"ids":[],"kind":"named in documents","name":"Hunter Point","tied_by":"name","block":null,"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:33/4",1947,1930,"1930","alternative","study or report",null,"Hoover-Young location No. 5 · proposes: bridge springing from Hunter Point, landing on approximately the southwest corner of Alameda","unverified","C124921430",33,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n32",null,"No. 5 of which contemplated a bridge springing from Hunter Point and landing on approximately the southwest corner of Alameda.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:171/1",1947,1941,"1941","alternative","study or report",null,"Hunter Point to Bay Farm Island bridge · proposes: high-level bridge from Hunter Point (west of Point Avisadero) to Bay Farm Island","unverified","C124921430",171,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n170",null,"a high-level bridge from Hunter Point (west of Point Avisadero) to Bay Farm Island, and a low-level bridge from Double Rock",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:171/2",1947,1941,"1941","alternative","study or report",null,"Double Rock to Bay Farm Island bridge · proposes: low-level bridge from Double Rock (between Hunter Point and Candlestick Point) to Bay Farm Island","unverified","C124921430",171,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n170",null,"a low-level bridge from Double Rock (between Hunter Point and Candlestick Point) to Bay Farm Island.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:171/3",1947,1941,"1941","finding","study or report",null,"Hunter Point-Bay Farm Island bridge · finding: structurally feasible at the stated location but unnecessary from the standpoint of national defense","unverified","C124921430",171,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n170",null,"a bridge at the location stated is structurally feasible, such bridge is unnecessary from the standpoint of na tional",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:33/6",1947,1941,"1941","finding","study or report",null,"Joint Army-Navy Board · finding: no present or immediately prospective need for a bridge between Hunter Point and Bay Farm Island","unverified","C124921430",33,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n32",null,"there is no present or immediately prospective need for a bridge across San Francisco Bay",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:111/2",1947,1947,"","measure","study or report",null,"Proposed Bay crossing, western terminus between Potrero Point and Hunter Point · other: Minimum clearance of 1,500 feet for a span over deep water","unverified","C124921430",111,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n110",null,"Any proposed crossing with its western terminus south of Potrero Point and north of Hunter Point should provide a span over deep water with a minimum clearance of 1,500 feet.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:111/3",1947,1947,"","measure","study or report",null,"Proposed Bay crossing, secondary channels between Potrero Point and Hunter Point · other: Secondary channels with horizontal clearance of 600 feet on each side of the main span","unverified","C124921430",111,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n110",null,"In addition, a oridge located in this area should provide secondary channels with horizontal clearances of 600 feet on each side of the main span.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:111/4",1947,1947,"","measure","study or report",null,"Proposed Bay crossing, south of Hunter Point · other: Minimum clearance between fenders of 500 feet","unverified","C124921430",111,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n110",null,"South cof Hunter Point, a minimum clearance between fenders of 500 feet should be provided.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:117/1",1947,1947,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Crossing from Hunter Point area to Bay Farm Island · rejected: a crossing between these two locations can be eliminated from further consideration","unverified","C124921430",117,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n116",null,"a crossing between these two locations can be eliminated from further consideration",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:15/1",1947,1947,"","finding","study or report",null,"Proposed bridge between Hunter Point and Bay Farm Island · finding: A bridge would adversely affect naval operations and the defense of naval establishments in the vicinity","unverified","C124921430",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n14",null,"A bridge between Hunter Point and Bay Farm Island would adversely affect naval operations",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:15/2",1947,1947,"","finding","study or report",null,"Proposed bridge between Hunter Point and Bay Farm Island · finding: No present or immediately prospective national defense need for a bridge between Hunter Point and Bay Farm Island","unverified","C124921430",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n14",null,"there is no present or immediately prospective need for a bridge across San Francisco Bay between Hunter Point and Bay Farm Island",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:15/3",1947,1947,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Proposed bridge between Hunter Point and Bay Farm Island · recommendation: No bridge can be constructed between Hunter Point and Bay Farm Island at the present time on the basis of national defense requirements","unverified","C124921430",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n14",null,"No bridge can be constructed across San Francisco Bay between Hunter Point and Bay Farm Island at the present time",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:169/1",1947,1947,"","site","study or report",null,"Hunter Point shipyard · finding: facilities proved their adequacy in support of the late Pacific War","unverified","C124921430",169,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n168",null,"These facilities have proved their adequacy in support of the late Pacific Ware",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:169/2",1947,1947,"","finding","study or report",null,"Reber Plan · finding: would jeopardize the mobility of fleet units at Hunter Point shipyard","unverified","C124921430",169,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n168",null,"it would jeopardize the mobility of any of the fleet units at either of these shipyards",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:173/1",1947,1947,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Hunter Point bridge · recommendation: high-level double deck bridge springing from Hunter Point west of Point Avisadero, four traffic lanes upper deck, two truck lanes and two railway tracks on lower decks","unverified","C124921430",173,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n172",null,"it be a high level double deck bridge, springing from Hunter Point west of Point Avisadero (the tip of Hunter Point)",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:173/2",1947,1947,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"crossing south of Hunter Point · recommendation: any crossing south of Hunter Point should be a low-level bridge","unverified","C124921430",173,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n172",null,"The present Board concurs in the recommendation that any crossing south of Hunter Point should be a low-level bridge.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:173/4",1947,1947,"","finding","study or report",null,"bridge springing from vicinity of Hunter Point · other: would serve only 11 percent of the present traffic","unverified","C124921430",173,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n172",null,"would serve only 11 percent of the present traffic.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:175/2",1947,1947,"","finding","study or report",null,"Hunter Point to Bay Farm Island crossing · finding: would not serve the present pattern of traffic reasonably well or provide for future traffic","unverified","C124921430",175,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n174",null,"The Board concludes that a crossing from Hunter Point to Bay Farm Island would not serve the present pattern of traffic reasonably well",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:175/6",1947,1947,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Additional freeway from Hunter Point · proposes: additional freeway needed from Hunter Point beyond Southern Pacific tracks south of Townsend Street","unverified","C124921430",175,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n174","Townsend Street","an additional freeway for bringing such cross-bay traffic from Hunter Point to and beyond the Southern Pacific and other tracks south of Townsend Street",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","m",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:177/3",1947,1947,"","finding","study or report",null,"Hunter Point to Bay Farm Island crossing · finding: limited traffic estimated at 2,200,000 vehicles per year would provide insufficient income","unverified","C124921430",177,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n176",null,"the limited amount of traffic estimated at 2,200,000 vehicles per year, that would be attracted to it would provide such a limited income",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:19/1",1947,1947,"","finding","study or report",null,"Hunter Point to Bay Farm Island crossing · finding: would not solve the present problems","unverified","C124921430",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n18",null,"from Hunter Point to Bay Farm Island, would not solve the present probleme",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:19/2",1947,1947,"","finding","study or report",null,"Continuous low level bridge with draw or lift span · finding: definitely objectionable from water-borne and highway traffic and national defense standpoints","unverified","C124921430",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n18",null,"A continuous low level bridge with draw or lift span located northerly of Hunter Point is definitely objectionable",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:41/2",1947,1947,"","action","study or report",null,"Reconnaissance of bay crossings · other: Air, land and water reconnaissance of crossings recommended by the 1941 Board, from Hunter Point to Bay Farm Island","unverified","C124921430",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n40",null,"Reconnaissances were made from the air, land, and water of the crossings recommended by the 1941 Board from Hunter Point to Bay Farm Island",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:77/1",1947,1947,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Walsh Plan · proposes: bridge from the San Francisco shore just north of Hunter Point","unverified","C124921430",77,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n76",null,"proposed a bridge from the San Francisco shore just north of Hunter Point to a point on the pierhead line in the East Bay",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:113/1",1947,1947,"1947","recommendation","study or report",null,"Additional crossing of San Francisco Bay · recommendation: Vertical clearance of 76 feet in closed position and 146 feet in open position above mean lower low water","unverified","C124921430",113,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n112",null,"Locations south of Hunter Point should provide a vertical clearance over the channel of 76 feet in a closed position and 146 feet in an open position",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:121/1",1947,1947,"1947","finding","study or report",null,"Crossing located northerly of Hunter Point · finding: must permit unhindered passage of commercial and naval vessels of all types and sizes","unverified","C124921430",121,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n120",null,"crossing located northerly of Hunter Point must permit wmhindered passage of both commercial and naval vessels of all types and sizes.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:121/2",1947,1947,"1947","site","study or report",null,"San Francisco Naval Shipyard at Hunter Point · finding: would be isolated if damage rendered a draw or lift span inoperative","unverified","C124921430",121,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n120",null,"any damage which would render inoperative a draw or lift span would isolate the South Bay and San Francisco Naval Shipyard at Hunter Point.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:177/1",1947,1947,"1947","finding","study or report",null,"Hunter Point to Bay Farm Island crossing · finding: would not provide an adequate solution to the present problem","unverified","C124921430",177,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n176",null,"The Board concludes that a crossing at the locations reported on to Congress in response to House Resolution 158, 77th Congress, first session, from Hunter Point to Bay Farm Island would not provide an adequate solution",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:177/2",1947,1947,"1947","site","study or report",null,"San Francisco Naval Shipyard at Hunter Point · finding: crossing would restrict free access of naval vessels to the northerly part of the shipyard","unverified","C124921430",177,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n176",null,"However, it would restrict free access of naval vessels to the northerly part of the San Francisco Naval Shipyard at Hunter Point.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:187/1",1947,1947,"1947","alternative","study or report",null,"Additional San Francisco Bay crossing (Bay Farm Island route) · proposes: Crossing on an axis in line with Bay Farm Island, just north of Hunter Point","unverified","C124921430",187,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n186",null,"just north of Hunter Point, San Francisco, on an axis in line with Bay Farm Island.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:187/2",1947,1947,"1947","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Naval Shipyard at Hunter Point · other: Bridge would come within approximately 800 feet of northerly installations","unverified","C124921430",187,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n186",null,"the bridge would come undesirably close (within approxi- mately 800 feet) to the northerly installations of the San Francisco Naval Shipyard at Hunter Point.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:187/3",1947,1947,"1947","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Naval Shipyard at Hunter Point · finding: Crossing would interfere with naval activities at Hunter Point","unverified","C124921430",187,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n186",null,"would interfere with naval activities at Hunter Point.",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:191/1",1947,1947,"1947","alternative","study or report",null,"Plan No. 22 (Fred J. Drake) · proposes: solid-fill causeway south of Army Street-Webster Street line connecting Hunter Point and Candlestick Point, San Francisco","unverified","C124921430",191,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n190","Army Street","This plan proposed & sOlid-fill causeway south of the Army Street-—Webster Street line and connecting Hunter Point between Candlestick Point, San Francisco",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:33/5",1947,1947,"July 1941","event","study or report",null,"Joint Army-Navy Board · other: appointed to investigate need and feasibility of a bridge between Hunter Point and Bay Farm Island","unverified","C124921430",33,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n32",null,"A Joint Army-Navy Board was appointed in July 1941 to",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124921430:91/1",1947,1954,"1954","project","study or report",null,"Hunter Point-Bay Farm Island crossing · finding: traffic demand would pass the point where the crossing would relieve congestion on the present bridge, by 1954","unverified","C124921430",91,"https://archive.org/details/C124921430/page/n90",null,"the traffic demand would pass the point where a Hunter Point-Bay Farm Island cressing would provide",null,"Report of Joint Army-Navy Board on an additional crossing of San Francisco Bay","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915258:550/6",1998,1998,"1998","project","environmental impact report",null,"MUNI Third Street Light Rail · proposes: light rail extension south from downtown to serve Bayview-Hunter Point community","unverified","C124915258",550,"https://archive.org/details/C124915258/page/n549",null,null,null,"Draft environmental impact statement/draft environmental impact report for the Third Street light rail project in the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-3.0]]}