{"id":null,"ids":[],"kind":"named in documents","name":"Kearney Street","tied_by":"name","block":null,"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed21sanfrich:923/2",1926,1926,"1926-05-24","motion",null,"passed","A lease of premises at 333 Kearney Street costing $14,233 (≈ $270,942 in 2026 dollars) was added to the budget.","unverified","journalofproceed21sanfrich",923,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed21sanfrich/page/n923",null,"Supervisor Havenner, seconded by Supervisor Gallagher, moved to include in the Budget in Miscellaneous Accounts",null,null,"n","a",0,1.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed31sanfrich:575/1",1936,1936,"1936-05-04","contract",null,null,"The city proposed a five-year lease of 333 Kearney Street at $639 (≈ $15,490 in 2026 dollars) monthly for the District Attorney and Public Defender.","quoted","journalofproceed31sanfrich",575,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed31sanfrich/page/n575",null,"Lease of 333 Kearney Street for District Attorney, et al. (Code No. 12.1739)",null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899628:37/3",1975,1975,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Transit only lane · recommendation: extend transit only lane east to Kearney Street","unverified","C124899628",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124899628/page/n36",null,null,null,"A monitoring of the Post-Sutter transit preferential treatment program","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899655:20/6",1978,1978,"","site","environmental impact report",null,"Kearney Street view corridor · other: View corridor down Kearney Street will not be blocked by the building or service yard","unverified","C124899655",20,"https://archive.org/details/C124899655/page/n19","Kearney Street",null,null,"Final environmental impact report on Northpoint Pier : storage building and service yard, San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:40/10003",1984,1984,"","measure","study or report",null,"Kearney Street height limit · height ft: up to 320 feet permitted","unverified","C124891981",40,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n38","Kearney Street",null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:40/3",1984,1984,"","measure","study or report",null,"Chinatown height limit on Kearney Street · height ft: up to 320 feet permitted",null,"C124891981",40,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n38","Kearney Street",null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:46/2",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Kearney Street · finding: Under development under existing regulations, high buildings along Kearney produce downwashes and corner effects that increase wind ratios at their base","unverified","C124891981",46,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n44","Kearney Street",null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:46/3",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Kearney Street · finding: No wind ratio under development under existing regulations is high enough to constitute a severe problem","unverified","C124891981",46,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n44","Kearney Street",null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:46/4",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Kearney Street · finding: Under the mitigated scenario, wind ratios along Kearney are significantly reduced","unverified","C124891981",46,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n44","Kearney Street",null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:48/2",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Kearney Street new tall buildings · finding: Wind ratios increased to extremely high levels at several points under existing regulations","unverified","C124891981",48,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n46","Kearney Street",null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:48/3",1984,1984,"","finding","study or report",null,"Kearney Street buildings (mitigated scenario) · finding: Building modifications lower wind ratios considerably at their bases","unverified","C124891981",48,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n46","Kearney Street",null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:57/1",1984,1984,"","site","study or report",null,"Kearney Street · finding: wintertime thermal comfort somewhat below average to average","unverified","C124891981",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n55","Kearney Street",null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:57/4",1984,1984,"","alternative","study or report",null,"Mitigated development scenario · finding: restores comfort readings at most points to existing-conditions levels","unverified","C124891981",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n55","Kearney Street",null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:59/1",1984,1984,"1984","finding","study or report",null,"Kearney Street · finding: summer thermal comfort conditions are generally fairly good, reflecting good sun exposures and moderate wind conditions","unverified","C124891981",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n57","Kearney Street",null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:59/2",1984,1984,"1984","finding","study or report",null,"Kearney Street development under existing controls · finding: reduces comfort readings by 25% to 40% through greater shading and corner winds","unverified","C124891981",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n57","Kearney Street",null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:59/3",1984,1984,"1984","finding","study or report",null,"Kearney Street mitigated design · finding: significantly reduces the development's wind effects and partially reduces shading effects, restoring comfort percentages closer to existing levels","unverified","C124891981",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n57","Kearney Street",null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:58/1",1984,1984,"Spring","finding","study or report",null,"Kearney Street · finding: Spring thermal comfort conditions range from fair to very good under existing conditions","unverified","C124891981",58,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n56","Kearney Street",null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:58/2",1984,1984,"Spring","finding","study or report",null,"Kearney Street · finding: Comfort percentages at most points reduced by half or more under development under existing regulations","unverified","C124891981",58,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n56","Kearney Street",null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:58/3",1984,1984,"Spring","finding","study or report",null,"Kearney Street mitigated development · finding: Stepped back and slightly lowered buildings greatly moderate impacts, restoring comfort levels near existing conditions","unverified","C124891981",58,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n56","Kearney Street",null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:60/1",1984,1984,"fall","finding","study or report",null,"Kearney Street · finding: severe drop in comfort hours on east side of Kearney at Clay under existing controls","unverified","C124891981",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n58","Kearney Street",null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:60/2",1984,1984,"fall","finding","study or report",null,"Kearney Street · finding: under mitigated scenario, comfort percentages on east side return to original levels","unverified","C124891981",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n58","Kearney Street",null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124891981:60/3",1984,1984,"fall","finding","study or report",null,"Kearney Street blocky building site · finding: shadows from assumed blocky building keep comfort percentages quite low on west side","unverified","C124891981",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124891981/page/n58","Kearney Street",null,null,"Sun, wind, and comfort : a study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124904960:151/5",1990,1990,"","finding","study or report",null,"Francisco Reservoir · other: service area could include most of the Financial District, to as high as Kearney Street","unverified","C124904960",151,"https://archive.org/details/C124904960/page/n150","Kearney Street",null,null,"Final report Balboa and Francisco Reservoirs needs assessment","n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich:254/12",1995,1995,"1995-12-04","resolution","water-sewers","referred","Proposed $189,710 (≈ $419,428 in 2026 dollars) emergency replacement of a sewer on Pacific Avenue between Grant Avenue and Kearney Street sent to committee.","quoted","journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich",254,"https://archive.org/details/journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich/page/n251",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697894:220/3",1998,1998,"","site","environmental impact report",null,"new Chinatown/North Beach campus · proposes: new campus at Washington and Kearney Street","unverified","C101697894",220,"https://archive.org/details/C101697894/page/n219","Kearney Street",null,null,"City College of San Francisco Chinatown/North Beach campus : comments and responses","n","a",0,-1.0]]}