{"id":null,"ids":[],"kind":"named in documents","name":"Mission Viaduct","tied_by":"name","block":null,"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1908sanfrich:1045/3",1908,1908,"1908-10-26","resolution","transit","passed","The Board adopted $250 (≈ $9,359 in 2026 dollars) for plans and specifications for the Mission Viaduct over Islais Creek, by 18 votes.","unverified","journalofproceed1908sanfrich",1045,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1908sanfrich/page/n1045",null,"Providing $250 for Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Mission Viaduct",null,null,"n","a",0,2.65],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1908sanfrich|1474",1908,1908,"1908-10-26","ordinance","running-the-city",null,"Plans ordered for the Mission Viaduct over Islais Creek","unverified","journalofproceed1908sanfrich",1045,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1908sanfrich/page/n1045",null,"Ordinance Xo. CXew Series), entitled. \"Authorizing the apDointment by the Tax Collector of an Expert Accountant from tlie Civil Se.-vice list of Dejjuties for the Tax Collector's ofiice, and fixing his compensation.\" ^ver T' ar](i}n'i: Providing $?50 for Preparation of Plans nrr! S '^ecificati \"^ns ",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sd:d128f225e3",1909,1909,"1909-12-13",null,"budget","passed","$2,020 (≈ $75,624 in 2026 dollars) paid to property owners for Mission Viaduct damage","unverified",null,null,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1909sanfrich/page/n1283/mode/1up",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.37],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:1291/3",1910,1910,"","project","other",null,"Mission Viaduct · other: Work done under bond","unverified","C101744336",1291,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n1290",null,"Mission Viaduct, work done under bond...................... 323, 324",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:378/1",1910,1910,"","finding","other",null,"Mission Viaduct · finding: Board of Public Works has no legal right to retain money due Healy-Tibbitts and Massachusetts Bonding contractors","unverified","C101744336",378,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n377","Mission Road","the Board of Public Works has no legal right to retain any of said money from the Healy-Tibbitts Construction Company or the Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company.",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:379/1",1910,1910,"","finding","other",null,"Mission Viaduct approaches fill · finding: none of the Charter provisions concerning the making of contracts were complied with","unverified","C101744336",379,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n378",null,"none of the Charter provisions concerning the making of contracts were complied with.",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:379/2",1910,1910,"","measure","other",null,"Mission Viaduct fill by United Railroads · cost usd: 15 cents a cubic yard","unverified","C101744336",379,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n378",null,"that the United Railroads would receive therefor the sum of 15 cents a cubic yard.",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:379/3",1910,1910,"","finding","other",null,"Board of Public Works contract for Mission Viaduct fill · finding: total absence of any official action of the Board of Public Works regarding the alleged contract","unverified","C101744336",379,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n378",null,"there is a total absence of any official action of the Board of Public Works in regard to said alleged contract.",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:379/4",1910,1910,"","project","other",null,"Mission Viaduct · other: fill to be made on the first or southerly section of the viaduct per Black letter","unverified","C101744336",379,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n378",null,"the letter from Mr. Black specifies that the fill is to be made on the first or southerly section of the viaduct.",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:380/1",1910,1910,"","finding","other",null,"Mission Viaduct approaches · finding: United Railroads has no valid claim against the City and County for work or materials furnished to complete the approaches","unverified","C101744336",380,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n379",null,"it is my opinion that the United Railroads had and has no valid claim against the City and County of San Francisco",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:378/2",1910,1910,"1910-02-21","action","other",null,"Mission Viaduct · other: agreement of February 21, 1910 between City and United Railroads on contribution toward viaduct","unverified","C101744336",378,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n377","Mission Road","the contribution of the sum of $20,000.00 by the United Railroads of San Francisco toward the cost and expense of constructing the viaduct",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:378/3",1910,1910,"1910-02-21","action","other",null,"Mission Viaduct · cost usd: United Railroads promise of work and labor on viaduct to the extent of $30,000.00","unverified","C101744336",378,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n377","Mission Road","Said agreement contained the promise of the United Railroads to perform work and labor in and upon said viaduct and approaches thereto to the extent of $30,000.00.",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:378/5",1910,1910,"1910-02-21","project","other",null,"Mission Viaduct approaches fill · other: United Railroads to make fill for approaches to permanent viaduct, approximately 20,000 cubic yards","unverified","C101744336",378,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n377","Mission Road","the United Railroads will make all the fill required by the attached plans and specifications approximating 20,000 cubic yards",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:378/4",1910,1910,"1910-02-25","action","other",null,"Resolution No. 5400 (New Series) · adopted: Board of Supervisors resolution incorporating agreement on Mission Viaduct","unverified","C101744336",378,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n377","Mission Road","Said agreement is incorporated in Resolution No. 5400 (New Series) of the Board of Supervisors, approved February 25, 1910",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:376/3",1910,1910,"May 22, 191s","project","other",null,"Mission Viaduct · other: Payment for making the necessary earth fill at the approaches to the Mission Viaduct","unverified","C101744336",376,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n375","Mission Viaduct","The Keystone Construction Company received a contract from the City and County for the construction of one section of the Mission Viaduct",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:376/4",1910,1910,"May 22, 191s","action","other",null,"Mission Viaduct earth fill · cost usd: $20,000.00 paid by United Railroads of San Francisco","unverified","C101744336",376,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n375","Mission Viaduct","The United Railroads of San Francisco paid the sum of $20,000.00",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:377/1",1910,1910,"May 22, 191s","project","other",null,"Mission Viaduct · cost usd: United Railroads offered to do work amounting to $30,000 or thereabouts, including a fill","unverified","C101744336",377,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n376",null,"offered to do work, amounting to the sum of $30,000.00 or thereabouts, upon the same, including the making of a fill",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:377/2",1910,1910,"May 22, 191s","event","other",null,"Mission Viaduct · other: Keystone Construction Company failed to perform its contract; work completed by Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company as surety","unverified","C101744336",377,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n376",null,"The Keystone Construction Company failed to perform its contract with the City and the work contracted for to be performed by said company was afterward carried forward to completion",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:377/3",1910,1910,"May 22, 191s","event","other",null,"Mission Viaduct · other: Healy-Tibbitts Construction Company fully performed its contract for the second section","unverified","C101744336",377,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n376",null,"the contract of the Healy-Tibbitts Construction Company was fully performed by said company",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:377/4",1910,1910,"May 22, 191s","finding","other",null,"Mission Viaduct · finding: Contractors were under no obligation to replace earth removed to carry forward their contracts","unverified","C101744336",377,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n376",null,"it does not appear from said contracts that either of said companies was under any obligation to replace the earth removed by them",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:377/5",1910,1910,"May 22, 191s","finding","other",null,"Mission Viaduct · finding: No reason found for Board of Public Works retention of funds for the United Railroads fill","unverified","C101744336",377,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n376",null,"I can see no reason for the retention by the Board of Public",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1911sanfrich:1143/2",1911,1911,null,"resolution","police",null,"Resolution authorizes $23,389.93 (≈ $844,396 in 2026 dollars) from the General Fund for cement, a police station, a fire house and Mission viaduct work.","unverified","journalofproceed1911sanfrich",null,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1911sanfrich/page/n1143",null,"Authorizing Payment, Sundry Supplies and Services. Also, Resolution No. (New Series)",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1911sanfrich:1165/2",1911,1911,null,"resolution","police","passed","Board approved payments for street cement, a Richmond Police Station contract, a Seventh street fire house wiring job, and Mission viaduct work.","unverified","journalofproceed1911sanfrich",1165,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1911sanfrich/page/n1165",null,"Authorizing Payment, Sundry Supplies and Services. Resolution No. 9058 (New Series) Authorizing the following expenditures to be made out of the General Fund",null,null,"n","a",0,2.69],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1911sanfrich:497/4",1911,1911,null,"resolution","water-sewers","passed","Keystone Construction Company was granted a ninety-day blasting permit for sewer excavation at the Mission viaduct, subject to a $2500 (≈ $90,252 in 2026 dollars) bond.","unverified","journalofproceed1911sanfrich",497,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1911sanfrich/page/n497",null,"Granting the Keystone Construction Company permission, revocable at will of the Board of Supervisors, for a period of ninety days",null,null,"n","a",0,2.61],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1911sanfrich:526/1",1911,1911,null,"resolution","water-sewers","passed","Keystone Construction Company was granted a 90-day permit to blast while building the Mission viaduct sewer.","unverified","journalofproceed1911sanfrich",526,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1911sanfrich/page/n526",null,"Resolution No. 7952 (New Series), Granting the Keystone Construction Company permission, revocable at will",null,null,"n","a",0,2.61],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1911sanfrich:761/2",1911,1911,null,"resolution",null,null,"Proposed $7,755.75 (≈ $279,989 in 2026 dollars) payment to Healy-Tibbitts Construction Company for the north end of Mission viaduct.","unverified","journalofproceed1911sanfrich",null,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1911sanfrich/page/n761",null,"Authorizing Payment, Construction of Mission Viaduct. Also, Kesolution No. (New Series). Authorizing an expediture of",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1911sanfrich:938/2",1911,1911,null,"resolution",null,null,"Healy-Tibbitts Construction Co. was authorized to receive $2,863.73 (≈ $103,383 in 2026 dollars) for work on the northerly section of Mission Viaduct.","unverified","journalofproceed1911sanfrich",938,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1911sanfrich/page/n938",null,"Authorizing Payment, Construction of IMission Viaduct. Also, Resolution No. (New Series), Authorizing an expenditure of $2,863.73",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1911sanfrich:966/5",1911,1911,null,"resolution",null,"passed","Payment of $2,863.73 (≈ $103,383 in 2026 dollars) to Healy-Tibbitts Construction Co. as a fourth installment on the northerly Mission Viaduct contract approved.","unverified","journalofproceed1911sanfrich",966,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1911sanfrich/page/n966",null,"Authorizing Payment, Construction of Mission Viaduct. Resolution No. 8693 (New Series)",null,null,"n","a",0,2.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1911sanfrich:773/5",1911,1911,"1911-08-28","resolution",null,"passed","City approved $7,755.75 (≈ $279,989 in 2026 dollars) second payment to Healy-Tibbitts Construction Company for north end of Mission viaduct.","unverified","journalofproceed1911sanfrich",773,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1911sanfrich/page/n773",null,"Authorizing Payment, Construction of Mission Viaduct.",null,null,"n","a",0,2.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1911sanfrich:848/4",1911,1911,"1911-09-18","resolution","fire","passed","Board authorized payments for fire station construction on Seventh street and San Bruno avenue, plus Mission Viaduct and street repairs.","unverified","journalofproceed1911sanfrich",848,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1911sanfrich/page/n848",null,"Authorizing Payment, Sundry Supplies and Services. Resolution No. 8457 (New Series). Authorizing the following expenditures to be made out of the General Fund",null,null,"n","a",0,2.72],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1911sanfrich:1050/5",1911,1911,"1911-11-20","resolution",null,null,"City payments for a Southern Pacific rail bridge at Miguel Street and the Mission Viaduct were proposed; the vote continues on the next page.","unverified","journalofproceed1911sanfrich",1050,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1911sanfrich/page/n1050",null,"Authorizing Payment, Construction of Bridge at Southern Pacific Right of Way at Miguel Street and Richland Avenue and Construction of Mission Viaduct. Resolution No. 8849",null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1911sanfrich:1158/9",1911,1911,"1911-12-18","claim",null,"referred","Baker & Hamilton claims $771.98 (≈ $27,869 in 2026 dollars) for hardware used on the Mission viaduct built by Keystone Construction Company.","unverified","journalofproceed1911sanfrich",null,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1911sanfrich/page/n1158",null,"From Baker & Hamilton, with notice of claim in sum of $771.98 for hardware furnished Keystone Con- struction Company",null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1912sanfrich:217/7",1912,1912,"1912-03-25","resolution",null,"passed","The Mission Promotion Association was granted permission to hold exercises celebrating completion of the Mission Viaduct.","quoted","journalofproceed1912sanfrich",217,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1912sanfrich/page/n217",null,"The Mission Promotion Association for authorization to conduct appropriate exercises to celebrate the completion of the Mission Viaduct",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1912sanfrich:218/2",1912,1912,"1912-03-25","resolution","transit","passed","Board adopted, as amended, a resolution urging city departments to speed plans for the Geary Street Railroad, incinerators, Mission Viaduct and schools.","quoted","journalofproceed1912sanfrich",218,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1912sanfrich/page/n218",null,"Departments Having Charge of Public Improvements Urged to aHtsen Work on Plans and Specifications",null,null,"n","a",0,2.78],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1912sanfrich:783/4",1912,1912,"1912-08-26","motion",null,"passed","Mission Promotion Association's request to celebrate the Mission viaduct's completion on September 15, 1912 was granted.","unverified","journalofproceed1912sanfrich",783,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1912sanfrich/page/n783",null,"Celebration of Completion of Mission Viaduct. Also, communication — From the Mission Promotion Association, requesting that",null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1912sanfrich:827/4",1912,1912,"1912-09-10","communication",null,"referred","Mission Promotion Association asked to move the Mission Viaduct celebration from September 15 to September 22, 1912; referred.","quoted","journalofproceed1912sanfrich",827,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1912sanfrich/page/n827",null,"Celebration of Completion of Mission Viaduct. Also, communication from the Mission Promotion Association",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1913sanfrich:628/2",1913,1913,"1913-06-09","resolution","fire","passed","Resolution 10,202 authorized payments for Civic Center land, a Mission viaduct, a fire engine house, and orphanage maintenance; passed 18 to 0.","quoted","journalofproceed1913sanfrich",628,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1913sanfrich/page/n628",null,"Authorizations. Resolution No. 10,202 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the following expenditures be and the same are hereby authorized",null,null,"n","a",0,4.44],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed1913sanfrich:790/2",1913,1913,"1913-07-14","resolution","schools","passed","Supervisors approved payments for school repairs, Lincoln way, the Mission Viaduct, animal impounding and other city expenses.","quoted","journalofproceed1913sanfrich",790,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed1913sanfrich/page/n790",null,"Also, Resolution No. 10276 (New Series), as follows: Resolved, That the following expenditures be and the same",null,null,"n","a",0,2.28],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed22sanfrich|2667",1927,1927,"1927-11-21","resolution","public-money",null,"Road money set for Turk Street and the Mission viaduct","quoted","journalofproceed22sanfrich",2289,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed22sanfrich/page/n2289",null,"Resolution No. 28037 (New Series). Appropriations Out of County Road Fund for Improvement of Turk Street, Mission Viaduct and Alemany Boulevard. Also,",null,null,"n","a",0,6.24],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich|341",1928,1928,"1928-02-06","ordinance","the-street","passed","Alemany Boulevard to be built from Ocean Avenue to Mission viaduct","quoted","journalofproceed23sanfrich",219,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n219",null,"Ordinance No. (New Series), as follows: Authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications for the construction of Alemany boulevard, Section \"B\", Contract No. 4, from Ocean avenue to the Mission viaduct, by grading, sewering and part-paving, and ordering the construction of Alemany boulevard, ",null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sq:305bc3bd4e",1928,1928,"1928-02-06",null,null,"passed","Alemany Boulevard built from Ocean Avenue to Mission viaduct","unverified","journalofproceed23sanfrich",219,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n219",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed23sanfrich|411",1928,1928,"1928-02-14","ordinance","the-street","passed","Alemany Boulevard to be built from Ocean Avenue to Mission viaduct","unverified","journalofproceed23sanfrich",270,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed23sanfrich/page/n270",null,"Ordinance No. 7913 (New Series), as follows: Authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications for the construction of Alemany boulevard. Section \"B\", Contract No. 4, from Ocean avenue to the Mission viaduct, by grading, sewering and part-paving, and ordering the construction of Alemany boulev",null,null,"n","a",0,6.19],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich:427/1",1931,1931,"1931-08-17","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Proposed paving of Alemany Boulevard, Section B, from Admiral Street to Mission Viaduct, estimated at $25,000 (≈ $554,178 in 2026 dollars).","quoted","journalofproceed26part2sanfrich",427,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich/page/n410",null,"Ordering Improvement of Alemany Boulevard, Section \"B,\" Plans and Specifications and Award of Contract, Estimated at $25,000,",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich|360",1931,1931,"1931-08-24","ordinance","the-street",null,"Alemany Boulevard to be paved from Admiral Street to Mission Viaduct","quoted","journalofproceed26part2sanfrich",460,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich/page/n443",null,"Ordinance No. 9050 (New Series), as follows: Ordering improvement of Alemany boulevard, Section B, from Admiral street to Mission Viaduct, by installation of permanent paving, drainage facilities, and appurtenances; authorizing and directing the Board of Public Works to prepare plans and specificati",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sq:b3d32aced1",1931,1931,"1931-08-24",null,null,"passed","Alemany Boulevard to get permanent paving from Admiral Street to Mission Viaduct","unverified","journalofproceed26part2sanfrich",460,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich/page/n443",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich|732",1931,1931,"1931-10-19","ordinance","the-street","passed first reading","Alemany Boulevard to be resurfaced between Mission viaduct and Bay Shore","quoted","journalofproceed26part2sanfrich",790,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich/page/n767",null,"Ordinance No. (New Series), as follows: Ordering the improvement of Alemany boulevard. Section \"A,\" from Mission viaduct to Bay Shore boulevard, by scarifying, rolling and oiling; authorizing and directing the Board of Public Works to prepare plans and specifications for said improvement, and to ent",null,null,"n","a",0,-0.96],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich|764",1931,1931,"1931-10-26","ordinance","the-street","passed","Alemany Boulevard resurfacing ordered from the Mission viaduct to Bay Shore","quoted","journalofproceed26part2sanfrich",820,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed26part2sanfrich/page/n797",null,"Ordinance No. 9091 (New Series), as follows: Ordering the improvement of Alemany boulevard, Section \"A,\" from Mission viaduct to Bay Shore boulevard, by scarifying, rolling and oiling; authorizing and directing the Board of Public Works to prepare plans and specifications for said improvement, and t",null,null,"n","a",0,-0.96],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed27sanfrich:29/3",1932,1932,"1932-01-04","resolution",null,"passed","Sixty-day extension granted to Fay Improvement Company to finish improving Alemany Boulevard from Admiral Avenue to Mission viaduct.","quoted","journalofproceed27sanfrich",29,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed27sanfrich/page/n29",null,"Extension of Time to Fay Improvement Company. Resolution No. 35595 (New Series), as follows:",null,null,"n","a",0,2.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed45sanfrich:577/3",1950,1950,"1950-06-05","resolution",null,"passed","Left-hand turns from Alemany Boulevard into Lyell and Rousseau Streets were banned temporarily during Mission Viaduct reconstruction.","quoted","journalofproceed45sanfrich",577,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed45sanfrich/page/n574",null,"Adding Alemany Boulevard into Lyell and Rousseau Streets to List of Streets from Which Left-Hand",null,null,"n","a",0,-0.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed45sanfrich:577/4",1950,1950,"1950-06-05","resolution",null,"passed","Parking was banned on both sides of Cayuga Avenue between Cuvier and Lyell Streets, temporarily, during Mission Viaduct work.","quoted","journalofproceed45sanfrich",577,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed45sanfrich/page/n574",null,"Adding Cayuga Avenue. Both Sides. Between Cuvier and Lyell Streets, to List of Streets",null,null,"n","a",0,-0.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed45sanfrich:577/5",1950,1950,"1950-06-05","resolution",null,"passed","Stop intersections were designated at corners of Rousseau, Lyell, Cayuga, Alemany and Admiral Streets during Mission Viaduct reconstruction.","quoted","journalofproceed45sanfrich",577,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed45sanfrich/page/n574",null,"Designating Northwest and Southeast Corners of Rousseau Street and Cayuga Avenue;",null,null,"n","a",0,2.12],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed45sanfrich|331",1950,1950,"1950-06-05","resolution","getting-around","passed","Rousseau, Lyell and Admiral Streets set southbound pending Mission Viaduct work","unverified","journalofproceed45sanfrich",577,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed45sanfrich/page/n574",null,"Resolution No. 9946 (Series of 1939) . (Rousseau Street, southbound, between Bosworth Street and Alcmany Boulevard: Lyell Street, southbound, between Cayuga Avenue and Alemany Boulevard; Cavuga Avenue, westbound, between Cuvier and Lyell Streets: Admiral Street, southbound, between Alemany Boulevard",null,null,"n","a",0,2.09],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed45sanfrich|332",1950,1950,"1950-06-05","resolution","getting-around",null,"A temporary traffic regulation adopted pending Mission Viaduct reconstruction","unverified","journalofproceed45sanfrich",577,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed45sanfrich/page/n574",null,"Resolution No. 9947 (Series of 1939). (Regulation temporary only — pending reconstruction of Mission Viaduct.) Adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Supervisors Christopher, Fazackerley, Gallagher, MacPhee, Mancuso, Mead, J. Joseph Sullivan — 7. Absent: Supervisors Halley, Lewis, McMurray, John J. Su",null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889945:12/3",1985,1985,"","building","study or report",null,"Islais and Salinas Water Company dam · other: small dam built west of the old Mission Viaduct near Rock House Gulch","unverified","C124889945",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124889945/page/n11",null,null,null,"San Francisco water & power : a history of the Municipal Water Department and Hetch Hetchy System","n","a",0,3.0]]}