{"id":null,"ids":[],"kind":"named in documents","name":"North Peter Smith Tract","tied_by":"name","block":null,"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:709/1",1910,1851,"6th day of September, 1851","event","other",null,"North Peter Smith Tract partition decree · event: Peter Smith judgment against City of San Francisco for $13,960 entered in Superior Court","unverified","C101744345",709,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n708",null,"one Peter Smith duly recovered a judgment against the City of San Francisco in the Superior Court of San Francisco for the sum of $13,960",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:1305/2",1910,1910,"","event","other",null,"North Peter Smith Tract · other: Judgment; pages 274, 707","unverified","C101744336",1305,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n1304",null,"NORTH PETER SMITH TRACT—Judgment ..............-.....1.--- 274, T07",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:330/3",1910,1910,"","finding","other",null,"North Peter Smith Tract · other: Dore v. Truett decree affects only the ninety-nine year interest of the City in the streets","unverified","C101744336",330,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n329",null,"The decree in Dore vs. Truett only affects the ninety-nine year interest of the City in the streets involved in the North Peter Smith Tract",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:709/3",1910,1910,"","event","other",null,"Laguna Street and Buchanan Street extension · other: Continued and extended northerly from southerly boundary of tract to Lewis Street, uniform width 68 feet 9 inches","unverified","C101744345",709,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n708","Laguna Street; Buchanan Street","both said streets are of a uniform width of 68 feet and 9 inches and are set apart as public streets",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:709/2",1910,1910,"30th day of January, 1852","event","other",null,"North Peter Smith Tract · event: City of San Francisco's interest sold by Sheriff to Isaac Thorne under execution","unverified","C101744345",709,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n708",null,"the interest of the City of San Francisco was sold by the Sherifl under said execution to one Isaac Thorne",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:763/3",1910,1910,"April 4, 1912","finding","other",null,"Van Ness Avenue tract (North Peter Smith Tract) · finding: litigation history set forth in City Attorney opinion to City Engineer","unverified","C101744336",763,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n762","Van Ness Avenue","The history of that litigation is set forth in an opinion rendered by me to the City Engineer on April 4, 1912",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","m",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:708/3",1910,1910,"January 29, 1904","event","other",null,"North Peter Smith Tract · other: partition action; referee's report filed and approved, division to parties","unverified","C101744345",708,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n707",null,"referee’s report made, division to parties, as written in report filed January 29th, 1904, and approved by court",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744345:708/4",1910,1910,"March 26, 1851","action","other",null,"North Peter Smith Tract tide lands · other: use and occupation granted to City and County of San Francisco for ninety-nine years","unverified","C101744345",708,"https://archive.org/details/C101744345/page/n707",null,"the Legislature of the State, by an act duly passed, granted the use and occupation of said property to the City and County of San Francisco for a term of ninety-nine years",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:328/10001",1910,1910,"March 29, 1904","event","other",null,"Dore vs. Truett decree, North Peter Smith Tract · other: decided by Judge Seawell; filed March 29, 1904","unverified","C101744336",328,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n327",null,"The case was decided by Judge Seawell on March 29, 1904.",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:328/4",1910,1910,"March 29, 1904","event","other",null,"Dore vs. Truett · event: decided by Judge Seawell, affecting North Peter Smith Tract","unverified","C101744336",328,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n327",null,"The case was decided by Judge Seawell on March 29, 1904.",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744336:763/2",1910,1910,"October 26, 1914","finding","other",null,"Van Ness Avenue tract (North Peter Smith Tract) · finding: in private ownership according to the decree in Ellen Dore et al. vs. Mortimer K. Truett et al.","unverified","C101744336",763,"https://archive.org/details/C101744336/page/n762","Van Ness Avenue","is in private ownership according to/the decree in the case of Ellen Dore et al. vs. Mortimer K. Truett et al.,",null,"Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]","n","m",0,-1.0]]}