{"id":null,"ids":[],"kind":"named in documents","name":"Red Rock Hill","tied_by":"name","block":null,"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:13/1",1961,1961,"","project","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill Competition · units: approximately 990 apartments","unverified","C124885392",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n12",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:13/2",1961,1961,"","project","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill Competition · acreage: 22 acres of land","unverified","C124885392",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n12",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:13/4",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill Competition · other: ten schematic designs selected","unverified","C124885392",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n12",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:13/5",1961,1961,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Architectural Advisory Panel · other: select and pay compensation for the ten best designs","unverified","C124885392",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n12",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:13/6",1961,1961,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill Competition · other: Agency to select up to five of the ten schemes for developers","unverified","C124885392",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n12",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:27/1",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: topography would require ingenious schemes and extensive study of architectural detail","unverified","C124885392",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n26",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:27/2",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: wind in the afternoon was blowing across the top of the site at a notable velocity","unverified","C124885392",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n26",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:27/3",1961,1961,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · recommendation: developer should review mean annual climatic conditions of the area","unverified","C124885392",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n26",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:27/4",1961,1961,"","event","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · event: number having merit reduced to fifteen","unverified","C124885392",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n26",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:27/7",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · other: winning submissions should show as many diversified ideas of merit as possible","unverified","C124885392",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n26",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:27/8",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · other: architect members emphasized design aspects while developers focused on economic aspects","unverified","C124885392",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n26",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:45/1",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill tower scheme · finding: free-standing towers emphasizing and giving identity to Red Rock Hill","unverified","C124885392",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n44",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:45/10",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill parking · finding: parking very well integrated and located with respect to tenant accessibility","unverified","C124885392",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n44",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:45/11",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill parking · finding: hexagonal shape needlessly expensive and less efficient","unverified","C124885392",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n44",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:45/2",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill site · finding: no means of sheltering the open spaces of the site from the wind","unverified","C124885392",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n44",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:45/4",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill site · finding: concept makes no attempt to define the usable open spaces","unverified","C124885392",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n44",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:45/8",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill apartments · finding: tower concept acceptable; hexagonal apartment shapes arbitrary and economically impractical","unverified","C124885392",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n44",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:45/9",1961,1961,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill apartments · recommendation: use more conventional designs, retaining architectural and monumental character","unverified","C124885392",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n44",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:51/1",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: excellent solution in the general expression and character of the project","unverified","C124885392",51,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n50",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:51/2",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: solution is harmonious with the topography in respect to practical considerations and an esthetic approach","unverified","C124885392",51,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n50",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:51/3",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: access to and from the streets successfully solved, with circulation articulated to adjacent community facilities to the south","unverified","C124885392",51,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n50",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:59/1",1961,1961,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights competition scheme · recommendation: further study required for design privacy and circulation in corridor structure connecting high-rise units","unverified","C124885392",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n58",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:59/2",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights competition scheme · finding: economically feasible; floor plans would support the suggested rentals","unverified","C124885392",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n58",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:59/3",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights competition scheme · finding: length of corridors in the corridor high-rise buildings may be excessive","unverified","C124885392",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n58",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:59/4",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights competition scheme · finding: adequate open space areas that could satisfactorily be developed for recreational purposes","unverified","C124885392",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n58",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:59/5",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights competition scheme · finding: dramatic scale of towers to be weighed against cost of extended perimeter wall area","unverified","C124885392",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n58",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:59/6",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights competition scheme · finding: desirable balance of elevator to garden-type buildings achieved","unverified","C124885392",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n58",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:59/7",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights competition scheme · finding: highly imaginative and competently executed scheme","unverified","C124885392",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n58",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:7/1",1961,1961,"","site","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill · other: one of the three elevations of Diamond Heights","unverified","C124885392",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n6",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:79/1",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill competition submission (three curved slabs) · finding: monumentality and extended length of the slabs are overbearing","unverified","C124885392",79,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n78",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:79/3",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill competition submission (low-rise buildings) · finding: many low-rise buildings on the south slope are remote from parking spaces","unverified","C124885392",79,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n78",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:79/4",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill competition submission (pedestrian access) · finding: pedestrian access to the community center to the south is not properly provided","unverified","C124885392",79,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n78",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:79/5",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill competition submission · finding: submission does not seem to assure economic feasibility","unverified","C124885392",79,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n78",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:79/6",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill competition submission (rental buildings) · finding: buildings are not in character with the rental scale set forth in the program","unverified","C124885392",79,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n78",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:83/1",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill competition scheme, Diamond Heights · finding: site plan of excellent quality; low-rise units sited with sensitivity to roads and contours","unverified","C124885392",83,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n82",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:83/2",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Tower apartments crowning Red Rock Hill · finding: architecture and detail fall off rapidly; towers undistinguished, though they should have outstanding architectural merit","unverified","C124885392",83,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n82",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:83/3",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Taller row units placed against the hillside, Red Rock Hill · finding: excessive foundation and retaining wall problems; likely excessive cost","unverified","C124885392",83,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n82",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:83/4",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill competition scheme, Diamond Heights · finding: highly unlikely the project could be developed within the economic criteria","unverified","C124885392",83,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n82",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:83/5",1961,1961,"","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill competition scheme, Diamond Heights · finding: scheme rates high in site arrangements; architecture and economic feasibility remain to be developed","unverified","C124885392",83,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n82",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:25/1",1961,1961,"1961","site","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill site · other: site of the architectural competition, Diamond Heights","unverified","C124885392",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n24",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:25/4",1961,1961,"1961","project","study or report",null,"[name withheld] Hill competition · other: ninety entries submitted","unverified","C124885392",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n24",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","m",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:25/5",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"[name withheld] Hill competition · other: sixty or more entries eliminated in the first review","unverified","C124885392",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n24",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","m",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:29/1",1961,1961,"1961","recommendation","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · recommendation: Selected architects work with the successful developer in joint collaboration on the design","unverified","C124885392",29,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n28",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:29/2",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: High construction cost due to topography must be offset by a favorable land cost to meet moderate rental objectives","unverified","C124885392",29,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n28",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:29/3",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: Participant anonymity protected by numbering each submission; winners identified after selection","unverified","C124885392",29,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n28",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:3/2",1961,1961,"1961","agency","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · lead agency: San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, in cooperation with the Northern California Chapter of the American Institute of Architects","unverified","C124885392",3,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n2",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:35/1",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: overall site plan is a thoughtful solution with good general character","unverified","C124885392",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n34",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:35/2",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: terrace apartments disposition shows sympathy of structures with topography","unverified","C124885392",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n34",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:35/3",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: concentration of high-rise and terrace apartments might challenge variety, human scale and identifiable dwelling groups","unverified","C124885392",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n34",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:35/4",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: omission of a large common space as dominant focal point is questionable","unverified","C124885392",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n34",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:35/5",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: general design quality is of high order but not the strongest exponent of a San Francisco flavor","unverified","C124885392",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n34",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:35/6",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: floor plans could support the proposed rental schedule","unverified","C124885392",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n34",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:35/7",1961,1961,"1961","recommendation","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · recommendation: three-bedroom apartments might better serve occupants if located in the terrace-apartment area","unverified","C124885392",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n34",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:37/1",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition project · finding: Balconies would add to general livability of units but their use is questionable due to prevailing climatic conditions","unverified","C124885392",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n36",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:37/2",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition project · recommendation: Recreation facilities well conceived and would add to attractiveness; use of swimming pools should be re-examined","unverified","C124885392",37,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n36",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:41/1",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition entry · finding: The attempt to preserve the feeling of a free and undisturbed flow of the site by floating the buildings is successful","unverified","C124885392",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n40",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:41/2",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition entry · finding: Wind screening at ground level presents a problem for further study","unverified","C124885392",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n40",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:41/3",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition entry · finding: The parking areas are well related to the dwelling units and adequately provided","unverified","C124885392",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n40",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:41/4",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition entry · finding: The richness, individuality and the flavor of San Francisco have been sacrificed","unverified","C124885392",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n40",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:41/5",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition entry · finding: The floor plans are very well conceived and the distribution of units in building types is well defined","unverified","C124885392",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n40",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:53/1",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition project · finding: considered economically practical, consistent in character with the surrounding area, and an enhancement of future developments","unverified","C124885392",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n52",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:53/2",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition project · finding: a very well-thought-out and successful solution with respect to all the objectives of the competition program","unverified","C124885392",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n52",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:53/3",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"garden-type apartments · finding: possible deficiency in code compliance for egress and ingress, which the Panel believes can be solved by further study","unverified","C124885392",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n52",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:53/4",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"parking solution · finding: economic analysis difficult to make from information furnished, but does not appear to be a serious deficiency","unverified","C124885392",53,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n52",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:57/1",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill competition scheme · finding: overall development of the site excellently handled; buildings and landscaping well integrated with topography","unverified","C124885392",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n56",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:57/2",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill competition scheme · finding: sensitive grouping of high-rise and low-rise buildings achieves a hill-sense","unverified","C124885392",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n56",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:57/3",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill open spaces · finding: useable open spaces sheltered from wind by building groups and changes of level","unverified","C124885392",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n56",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:57/4",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill green-belt concept · finding: continuation of green-belt or green strip system into Red Rock Hill integrates the site with surrounding area","unverified","C124885392",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n56",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:57/5",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill hilltop plaza · finding: well-defined plaza on the hilltop overlooking the city serves as community focal point","unverified","C124885392",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n56",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:57/6",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill competition scheme · finding: deficiency: lack of proximity of parking for some low-rise units","unverified","C124885392",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n56",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:57/7",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill south slope low-rise units · finding: concentration of low-rise units on south slope favorable for sun orientation and access to community center","unverified","C124885392",57,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n56",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:63/1",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition design · finding: stimulating and creative, particularly for the site","unverified","C124885392",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n62",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:63/2",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition design · finding: questionable whether it would achieve desired character and amenities for families","unverified","C124885392",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n62",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:63/3",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition design · finding: doubt whether the area would command the rents necessary to service the concept","unverified","C124885392",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n62",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:63/4",1961,1961,"1961","recommendation","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition design · recommendation: architect should be encouraged to solve better the problems of circulation and parking","unverified","C124885392",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n62",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:63/5",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition design · finding: floor plans acceptable for program requirements but could be improved with further study","unverified","C124885392",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n62",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:67/1",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: Preservation of the natural green strip along Clipper Street is commendable","unverified","C124885392",67,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n66","Clipper Street",null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","m",0,-3.5],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:67/2",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: Tower apartment plan does not appear economical from an operating point of view due to high ratio of elevators to units","unverified","C124885392",67,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n66",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:67/3",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: Parking relationship to dwelling units and parking access to streets have been well conceived","unverified","C124885392",67,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n66",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:69/1",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: General quality of project is good, with strong unity of character","unverified","C124885392",69,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n68",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:69/2",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: Feeling of a sophisticated row house neighborhood suggests a San Francisco character","unverified","C124885392",69,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n68",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:73/1",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition entry · finding: Street pattern preserved and parking efficiently integrated near apartment units with easy access from public streets","unverified","C124885392",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n72",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:73/2",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition entry · finding: High-rise buildings dispersed informally throughout the project, with a good ratio of high-rise to low-rise structures","unverified","C124885392",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n72",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:73/3",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition entry · finding: Proposal falls short of the quantity of apartments set forth in the competition goals, a serious deficiency if not correctable","unverified","C124885392",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n72",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:73/4",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition entry, garden-type units · finding: Floor plans of the garden-type units are generally acceptable","unverified","C124885392",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n72",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:73/5",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition entry, towers · finding: Floor plans of the towers are poorly conceived for a rental project of this type","unverified","C124885392",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n72",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:75/1",1961,1961,"1961","finding","study or report",null,"Red Rock Hill competition high-rise proposal · finding: Economies such as more units, consolidated utilities and better elevator ratios would be necessary for economic feasibility","unverified","C124885392",75,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n74",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:13/3",1961,1961,"February 24, 1961","event","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill Competition · event: Architectural Program Statement issued","unverified","C124885392",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n12",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:25/3",1961,1961,"June 13, 1961","event","study or report",null,"[name withheld] Hill competition · event: Panel met in session following public meeting called by Redevelopment Agency","unverified","C124885392",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n24",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","m",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:27/5",1961,1961,"June 14, 1961","event","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · event: five of the final fifteen eliminated and ten winning proposals selected","unverified","C124885392",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n26",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:27/6",1961,1961,"June 14, 1961","event","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · event: Panel reviewed all ninety submissions to confirm its verdict","unverified","C124885392",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n26",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:19/1",1961,1961,"June 30, 1961","event","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · event: Architectural Advisory Panel evaluation report","unverified","C124885392",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n18",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:3/1",1961,1961,"June 30, 1961","project","study or report",null,"Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · other: Architectural Advisory Panel evaluation report","unverified","C124885392",3,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n2",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:31/1",1961,1961,"June 30, 1961","finding","study or report",null,"[name withheld] Hill competition · other: Architectural Advisory Panel selection and evaluation of the ten best designs","unverified","C124885392",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n30",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:31/2",1961,1961,"June 30, 1961","project","study or report",null,"[name withheld] Hill competition · lead agency: San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","unverified","C124885392",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n30",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed59sanfrich|g1027",1964,1964,"1964-08-17","hearing","appeals","passed","Condo tax value cut for one owner","quoted","journalofproceed59sanfrich",703,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed59sanfrich/page/n700",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-0.47],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885417:32/3",1973,1973,"May 1, 1973","building","annual report",null,"Red Rock Hill · units: 104 units, new unsubsidized housing completed","unverified","C124885417",32,"https://archive.org/details/C124885417/page/n31",null,null,null,"San Francisco redevelopment 1971-1973","n","a",0,3.0]]}