{"id":null,"ids":[],"kind":"named in documents","name":"Redevelopment areas","tied_by":"name","block":null,"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed42sanfrich:547/2",1947,1947,"1947-03-10","ordinance","redevelopment","referred","Supervisor Lewis proposed designating several lots in Blocks 2634A, 2643A and 2643 as blighted redevelopment areas; referred to Judiciary Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed42sanfrich",547,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed42sanfrich/page/n547",null,"An Ordinance Designating Lot 1 of Block 2634A and Lots 2, 2B, 3 and 4 of Block 2643A and Lots 2, 3 and 4 of Block 2643",null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed46sanfrich:430/2",1951,1951,"1951-04-23","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Board adopted a resolution opposing state Assembly bills that would change how redevelopment areas are designated and who may start redevelopment.","quoted","journalofproceed46sanfrich",430,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed46sanfrich/page/n430",null,"Opposing Enactment of Assembly Bills 2727 and 3210, Relating to Community Redevelopment.",null,null,"n","a",0,6.79],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed48sanfrich:781/4",1953,1953,"1953-08-24","other","redevelopment",null,"Supervisor Halley asked the City Attorney to study banning secondary use of buildings removed from redevelopment areas.","quoted","journalofproceed48sanfrich",781,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed48sanfrich/page/n781",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:60/1",1970,1961,"1961-1964","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco vacant land (census tract net area, including vacant redevelopment areas and beaches) · finding: City average vacant land 6.85% of census tract net area","unverified","C124878408",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n59",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed58sanfrich|g373",1963,1963,"1963-04-15","resolution","works","passed","City plants trees on sidewalks in redevelopment areas","quoted","journalofproceed58sanfrich",203,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed58sanfrich/page/n202",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-0.71],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123313895:155/6",1967,1967,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"City-financed rent supplement program · recommendation: study of a City-financed rent supplement program related to redevelopment areas should be undertaken","unverified","C123313895",155,"https://archive.org/details/C123313895/page/n154",null,null,null,"A report on housing in San Francisco","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123313895:51/1",1967,1967,"1967","project","study or report",null,"Redevelopment areas, regular private market units · units: 8,207 planned, 2,603 completed","unverified","C123313895",51,"https://archive.org/details/C123313895/page/n50",null,null,null,"A report on housing in San Francisco","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123313895:49/5",1967,1967,"January, 1967","property_record","study or report",null,"Redevelopment areas market-rate units · units: 8,207 planned, 2,603 completed","unverified","C123313895",49,"https://archive.org/details/C123313895/page/n48",null,null,null,"A report on housing in San Francisco","n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed63sanfrich:107/4",1968,1968,"1968-02-05","resolution","redevelopment","passed","The Board adopted resolution 100-68, designating survey areas between the Butchertown and Hunters Point redevelopment areas.","quoted","journalofproceed63sanfrich",107,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed63sanfrich/page/n106",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,8.79],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:67/2",1970,1970,"end of 1968","event","study or report",null,"Golden Gateway, Diamond Heights, Western Addition A-1 redevelopment areas · built: Residential units had been constructed","unverified","C124878408",67,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n66",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","m",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123314321:93/6",1971,1971,"January 1, 1972 - December 31, 1973","project","plan",null,"Non-publicly-assisted housing in redevelopment areas · units: minimum of 800 dwelling units under construction or in advanced planning","unverified","C123314321",93,"https://archive.org/details/C123314321/page/n92",null,null,null,"Workable program for community improvement : application and recertification, January 1, 1972-December 21, 1973","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123314321:94/1",1971,1971,"January 1, 1972 - December 31, 1973","finding","plan",null,"Hunters Point and Western Addition Area A-2 Redevelopment Areas · other: Families and individuals to be rehoused into new MPPH housing within the Hunters Point and Western Addition Area A-2 Redevelopment Areas (Tables IV and V)","unverified","C123314321",94,"https://archive.org/details/C123314321/page/n93",null,null,null,"Workable program for community improvement : application and recertification, January 1, 1972-December 21, 1973","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123314321:102/3",1971,1971,"since June, 1970","agency","plan",null,"Bayview-Hunters Point Joint Housing Committee · lead agency: San Francisco Redevelopment Agency (as the PAC)","unverified","C123314321",102,"https://archive.org/details/C123314321/page/n101",null,null,null,"Workable program for community improvement : application and recertification, January 1, 1972-December 21, 1973","n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed67sanfrich:1073/1",1972,1972,"1972-11-06","ordinance","housing","passed first reading","Ordinance creating a Relocation Appeals Board for residents of redevelopment areas passed second reading, sent for final vote.","quoted","journalofproceed67sanfrich",1073,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed67sanfrich/page/n1072",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.51],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885417:35/5",1973,1972,"fiscal 1972-73","project","annual report",null,"Redevelopment areas · other: $10.6 million local property taxes generated in renewal areas","unverified","C124885417",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124885417/page/n34",null,null,null,"San Francisco redevelopment 1971-1973","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101696058:15/1",1973,1973,"","project","other",null,"San Francisco redevelopment areas (map legend) · other: Golden Gateway, Diamond Heights, Western Addition Areas A-1 and A-2, Yerba Buena Center, Chinese Cultural & Trade Center, Hunters Point, India Basin Industrial Park","unverified","C101696058",15,"https://archive.org/details/C101696058/page/n14",null,null,null,"Stroll through five redevelopment highlights in San Francisco with Margot Patterson Doss","n","m",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885417:35/6",1973,1973,"","project","annual report",null,"Eight redevelopment areas · other: $28.9 million annually in property tax revenues when completed","unverified","C124885417",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124885417/page/n34",null,null,null,"San Francisco redevelopment 1971-1973","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885417:11/1",1973,1973,"1973","project","annual report",null,"San Francisco redevelopment areas · other: eight redevelopment areas in construction or in use stage","unverified","C124885417",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124885417/page/n10",null,null,null,"San Francisco redevelopment 1971-1973","n","m",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885417:32/17",1973,1973,"May 1, 1973","event","annual report",null,"San Francisco redevelopment areas housing completed · units: 6,408 total dwelling units completed","unverified","C124885417",32,"https://archive.org/details/C124885417/page/n31",null,null,null,"San Francisco redevelopment 1971-1973","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902184:62/6",1987,1980,"1980","site","study or report",null,"San Francisco units in redevelopment areas · units: 1,374 units in redevelopment areas in South Bayshore","unverified","C124902184",62,"https://archive.org/details/C124902184/page/n61",null,null,null,"Issues report for the South Bayshore Study Area","n","m",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124905450:65/4",1991,1980,"1980 to 1988","finding","plan",null,"Affordable housing built 1980-1988 · other: about two-thirds in redevelopment areas","unverified","C124905450",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124905450/page/n64",null,null,null,"1992 comprehensive housing affordability strategy, city and county of San Francisco","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123306822:15/2",1982,1982,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Redevelopment areas demonstration sites · recommendation: Target redevelopment areas as demonstration sites for energy efficient housing","unverified","C123306822",15,"https://archive.org/details/C123306822/page/n14",null,null,null,"Comprehensive plan","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123306822:15/3",1982,1982,"","recommendation","plan",null,"Housing within redevelopment areas · recommendation: Achieve lower energy budgets than currently allowed under State Title 24 energy standards","unverified","C123306822",15,"https://archive.org/details/C123306822/page/n14",null,null,null,"Comprehensive plan","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124886581:3/6",1982,1982,"","project","annual report",null,"Redevelopment Agency new construction · other: nearly half a billion dollars in new construction","unverified","C124886581",3,"https://archive.org/details/C124886581/page/n2",null,null,null,"San Francisco : the mayor's annual \"state of the city\" report","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885198:40/9",1984,1984,"","site","plan",null,"Redevelopment Areas · other: 6,790","unverified","C124885198",40,"https://archive.org/details/C124885198/page/n39",null,null,null,"Residence : the residence element of the comprehensive plan of the city and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885198:62/4",1984,1984,"1984","measure","plan",null,"Residence Element - Moderately High Density redevelopment areas · proposes: Moderately High Density in major redevelopment areas and Nob Hill, Chinatown, North Beach","unverified","C124885198",62,"https://archive.org/details/C124885198/page/n61",null,null,null,"Residence : the residence element of the comprehensive plan of the city and County of San Francisco","n","m",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878958:15/22",1983,1985,"1985-1990","site","study or report",null,"Yerba Buena Center and Rincon Point-South Beach redevelopment areas · other: redevelopment areas providing 1985-1990 residential land supply","unverified","C124878958",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124878958/page/n14",null,null,null,"Local development policy survey update for San Francisco","n","m",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124894734:108/3",1989,1989,"since 1980","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment areas · other: one third (3,682) of the new units constructed","unverified","C124894734",108,"https://archive.org/details/C124894734/page/n107",null,null,null,"An affordable housing action plan for San Francisco : draft report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903568:26/1",1991,1991,"","measure","other",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Small Business Loan Program · other: Loan amount cannot exceed $50,000 or $100,000 with a companion loan","unverified","C124903568",26,"https://archive.org/details/C124903568/page/n25",null,null,null,"A guide to City Hall, city & county of San Francisco","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124904465:44/2",1991,1991,"","agency","plan",null,"Redevelopment Agency public art program · other: art in major private development in redevelopment areas","unverified","C124904465",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124904465/page/n43",null,null,null,"Proposed arts policy for the city and county of San Francisco : proposal for adoption","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124905450:56/5",1991,1991,"","finding","plan",null,"Mission Bay and South Bayshore redevelopment areas · other: one-third of the city's housing potential","unverified","C124905450",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124905450/page/n55",null,null,null,"1992 comprehensive housing affordability strategy, city and county of San Francisco","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124920755:129/1",1995,1995,"","finding","study or report",null,"Redevelopment Areas · other: seven areas of the City designated as Redevelopment Areas","unverified","C124920755",129,"https://archive.org/details/C124920755/page/n128",null,null,null,"San Francisco bicycle plan : draft report","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124920755:20/1",1995,1995,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Mission Bay and Embarcadero redevelopment areas · recommendation: should have a dedicated bicycle element as part of their circulation/open space plan","unverified","C124920755",20,"https://archive.org/details/C124920755/page/n19",null,null,null,"San Francisco bicycle plan : draft report","n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich:196/1",1995,1995,"1995-11-13","hearing","redevelopment",null,"Public hearing held on merging the South of Market and Golden Gateway redevelopment areas into one merged project.","quoted","journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich",196,"https://archive.org/details/journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich/page/n193",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich:196/2",1995,1995,"1995-11-13","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Board adopted a negative declaration finding that merging the South of Market and Golden Gateway redevelopment areas will not significantly affect the environment.","quoted","journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich",196,"https://archive.org/details/journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich/page/n193",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.91],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich:197/1",1995,1995,"1995-11-13","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Resolution finds the merger of the South of Market and Golden Gateway redevelopment areas has no significant environmental impact, adopted.","quoted","journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich",197,"https://archive.org/details/journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich/page/n194",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.79],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:117/1",1995,1995,"October 1992","project","study or report",null,"Rincon Point/South Beach Redevelopment Plan · proposes: 1,900-3,450 dwelling units","unverified","C124914193",117,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n117",null,null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed91sanfrich:258/5",1996,1996,"1996-04-01","ordinance",null,"referred","A proposed two percent hotel tax surcharge increase, with an extra surcharge in some redevelopment areas, was referred to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed91sanfrich",258,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed91sanfrich/page/n257",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich:190/2",1996,1996,"1996-06-24","hearing","redevelopment",null,"Public hearing closed on Ammiano's proposal to raise the hotel room tax surcharge by two percent, with an extra two percent in redevelopment areas.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich",190,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich/page/n187",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich:211/1",1996,1996,"1996-07-01","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","Hotel occupancy tax to rise two percent, with an extra surcharge in some redevelopment areas, passed for second reading.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich",211,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich/page/n208",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed92septdecsanfrich:97/1",1997,1997,"1997-10-14","ordinance","redevelopment","passed","Federal Office Building redevelopment plan approved and merged with the Embarcadero-Lower Market and South of Market redevelopment areas.","quoted","journalofproceed92septdecsanfrich",97,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed92septdecsanfrich/page/n96",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,7.41],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925579:121/3",2003,2003,"","project","plan",null,"Mission Bay and Hunters Point Naval Shipyard redevelopment areas · proposes: new neighborhoods promising approximately 7,600 units","unverified","C124925579",121,"https://archive.org/details/C124925579/page/n120",null,null,null,"Housing element : an element of the San Francisco general plan : final draft for public review","n","m",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925579:234/3",2003,2003,"","action","plan",null,"Transbay Terminal and Mid-Market Redevelopment Areas · other: General Plan amendments and adopt permanent zoning controls","unverified","C124925579",234,"https://archive.org/details/C124925579/page/n233",null,null,null,"Housing element : an element of the San Francisco general plan : final draft for public review","n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingaprmay2003minutes9811sanfrich|g251",2003,2003,"2003-04-15",null,"redevelopment","pending","Four redevelopment areas get no deadline on borrowing; still in committee.","unverified","meetingaprmay2003minutes9811sanfrich",144,"https://archive.org/details/meetingaprmay2003minutes9811sanfrich/page/n141",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjuneaug2003minutes9820sanfrich|g987",2003,2003,"2003-08-12",null,"redevelopment","passed","Old loan deadlines lifted in four redevelopment areas.","unverified","meetingjuneaug2003minutes9820sanfrich",351,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjuneaug2003minutes9820sanfrich/page/n348",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.04],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjuneaug2003minutes9820sanfrich|g988",2003,2003,"2003-08-12","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Old loan deadlines lifted in four redevelopment areas.","quoted","meetingjuneaug2003minutes9820sanfrich",351,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjuneaug2003minutes9820sanfrich/page/n348",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,7.04],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101746510:260/2",2004,2004,"","action","plan",null,"Transbay Terminal and Mid-Market Redevelopment Areas · proposes: General plan amendments and permanent zoning controls","unverified","C101746510",260,"https://archive.org/details/C101746510/page/n259",null,null,null,"Housing element : an element of the San Francisco general plan","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101746510:187/1",2004,2004,"2004","agency","plan",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: will continue to promote permanent affordable housing by approving construction of housing in designated redevelopment areas","unverified","C101746510",187,"https://archive.org/details/C101746510/page/n186",null,null,null,"Housing element : an element of the San Francisco general plan","n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutes20042005san|111",2004,2004,"2004-12-08","ordinance","land-and-building","referred","Longer housing debt limits for three redevelopment areas sent to committee","unverified","meetingminutes20042005san",288,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutes20042005san/page/n287",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutes20042005san|127",2004,2004,"2004-12-15","ordinance","land-and-building",null,"Longer housing debt limits for redevelopment areas recommended by committee","unverified","meetingminutes20042005san",313,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutes20042005san/page/n312",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingaprmay2005minutes100sanfrich:53/3",2005,2005,"2005-04-12","resolution","housing","referred","Resolution urging the state legislature to approve SB 521, easing transit village plans and redevelopment areas near stations.","quoted","meetingaprmay2005minutes100sanfrich",53,"https://archive.org/details/meetingaprmay2005minutes100sanfrich/page/n52",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjuneaug2007minutes102sanfrich:130/2",2007,2007,"2007-06-26","ordinance","redevelopment","passed first reading","Ordinance limiting the Redevelopment Agency's use of eminent domain in existing redevelopment areas passed on first reading.","quoted","meetingjuneaug2007minutes102sanfrich",130,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjuneaug2007minutes102sanfrich/page/n130",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,7.79],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2013sanf_2:73/5",2013,2013,"2013-09-24","ordinance","whats-being-built","referred","Proposed changes to transit impact fee exemptions for redevelopment areas, referred to the Land Use committee.","quoted","meetingminutesb2013sanf_2",73,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2013sanf_2/page/n72",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2013sanf_2:116/1",2013,2013,"2013-10-01","ordinance","whats-being-built","referred","Wiener proposes revising Transit Impact Development Fee exemptions for redevelopment areas, tying them to controlling agreements; referred to committee.","quoted","meetingminutesb2013sanf_2",116,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2013sanf_2/page/n115",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesdr2014sanf:70/3",2014,2014,"2014-02-11","ordinance","transit","passed first reading","Ordinance revising Transit Impact Development Fee exemptions in redevelopment areas passed on first reading, sponsored by Wiener.","quoted","meetingminutesdr2014sanf",70,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesdr2014sanf/page/n69",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.4],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2014sanf_1:110/1",2014,2014,"2014-02-25","ordinance","whats-being-built","passed","Ordinance 018-14 finally passed, revising transit fee exemptions for development in redevelopment areas and development agreements.","quoted","meetingminutesb2014sanf_1",110,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2014sanf_1/page/n109",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.69],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2014sanf_1:121/1",2014,2014,"2014-02-25","ordinance","redevelopment","referred","Cohen's ordinance proposes vacating streets in the Hunters Point Shipyard and Candlestick Point redevelopment areas; referred to committee.","quoted","meetingminutesb2014sanf_1",121,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2014sanf_1/page/n120",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2014sanf_1:125/4",2014,2014,"2014-02-25","hearing","redevelopment","referred","Hearing on an ordinance vacating streets and easements in the Hunters Point Shipyard and Candlestick Point redevelopment areas; referred to the Board.","quoted","meetingminutesb2014sanf_1",125,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2014sanf_1/page/n124",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesdr2014sanf:80/1",2014,2014,"2014-02-25","ordinance","redevelopment","passed","Wiener's ordinance revising Transit Impact Development Fee exemptions for redevelopment areas and development agreements passed final.","quoted","meetingminutesdr2014sanf",80,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesdr2014sanf/page/n79",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.91],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2014sanf_2:31/1",2014,2014,"2014-04-08","hearing","redevelopment",null,"Public hearing held on proposed street vacations within the Hunters Point Shipyard and Candlestick Point redevelopment areas; heard and filed.","quoted","meetingminutesb2014sanf_2",31,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2014sanf_2/page/n30",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2014sanf_2:32/1",2014,2014,"2014-04-08","ordinance","redevelopment","passed first reading","Board passed on first reading an ordinance vacating streets within the Hunters Point Shipyard and Candlestick Point redevelopment areas.","quoted","meetingminutesb2014sanf_2",32,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2014sanf_2/page/n31",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,7.04],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesdr2014sanf:187/1",2014,2014,"2014-04-08","hearing","redevelopment",null,"Public hearing held on proposed street vacations for Hunters Point Shipyard and Candlestick Point redevelopment areas; heard and filed.","quoted","meetingminutesdr2014sanf",187,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesdr2014sanf/page/n186",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesdr2014sanf:188/1",2014,2014,"2014-04-08","ordinance","redevelopment","passed first reading","Street vacations within the Hunters Point Shipyard and Candlestick Point redevelopment areas passed on first reading.","quoted","meetingminutesdr2014sanf",188,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesdr2014sanf/page/n187",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.91],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2014sanf_2:54/1",2014,2014,"2014-04-15","ordinance","redevelopment","passed","Street vacations within the Hunters Point Shipyard and Candlestick Point redevelopment areas were finally passed as Ordinance 053-14.","quoted","meetingminutesb2014sanf_2",54,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2014sanf_2/page/n53",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,7.16],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesdr2014sanf:204/1",2014,2014,"2014-04-15","ordinance","redevelopment","passed","Streets and easements in the Hunters Point Shipyard and Candlestick Point redevelopment areas were vacated by ordinance and finally passed.","quoted","meetingminutesdr2014sanf",204,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesdr2014sanf/page/n203",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,7.04]]}