{"id":null,"ids":[],"kind":"named in documents","name":"Redevelopment Project areas","tied_by":"name","block":null,"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed58sanfrich:203/4",1963,1963,"1963-04-15","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Trees were approved for planting in sidewalks of existing and future redevelopment project areas and accepted for city maintenance.","quoted","journalofproceed58sanfrich",203,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed58sanfrich/page/n202",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-0.59],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123314321:103/1",1971,1971,"","project","plan",null,"Hunters Point and India Basin Redevelopment Project Areas · units: 231 units of housing for families with low and moderate incomes","unverified","C123314321",103,"https://archive.org/details/C123314321/page/n102",null,null,null,"Workable program for community improvement : application and recertification, January 1, 1972-December 21, 1973","n","m",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123314321:103/2",1971,1971,"August 9, 1971","event","plan",null,"Hunters Point and India Basin Redevelopment Project Areas · other: construction of the first new dwelling units began","unverified","C123314321",103,"https://archive.org/details/C123314321/page/n102",null,null,null,"Workable program for community improvement : application and recertification, January 1, 1972-December 21, 1973","n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed67sanfrich|g874",1972,1972,"1972-04-10",null,"redevelopment","passed","Property taxes cancelled across several redevelopment project areas","unverified","journalofproceed67sanfrich",331,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed67sanfrich/page/n330",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.04],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124897620:96/1",1983,1983,"","building","plan",null,"Downtown Plan buildings list · other: Buildings in Redevelopment Project Areas are not covered by the Downtown Plan","unverified","c124897620",96,"https://archive.org/details/c124897620/page/n95",null,null,null,"The downtown plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124905450:111/8",1991,1991,"","measure","plan",null,"[name withheld] · cost usd: $5 million per year over the next five years","unverified","C124905450",111,"https://archive.org/details/C124905450/page/n110",null,null,null,"1992 comprehensive housing affordability strategy, city and county of San Francisco","n","m",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:126/1",1992,1992,"","measure","audit",null,"Agency small business development program · proposes: minimum of 5% of annual tax increment funds for local small business development","unverified","C124903911",126,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n125",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:126/2",1992,1992,"","measure","audit",null,"Agency small business loan fund · proposes: establish a fund for loans or direct investments in local small businesses","unverified","C124903911",126,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n125",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:40/5",1992,1992,"","project","audit",null,"Redevelopment project areas · other: five completed, one with no project funding allocated, six in various stages of completion","unverified","C124903911",40,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n39",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalseptdecofproceed88sanfrich:319/1",1993,1993,"1993-11-15","hearing","redevelopment","referred","The Board voted to schedule joint December 13, 1993 hearings on merging seven redevelopment project areas into one.","quoted","journalseptdecofproceed88sanfrich",319,"https://archive.org/details/journalseptdecofproceed88sanfrich/page/n319",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalseptdecofproceed88sanfrich:348/3",1993,1993,"1993-11-15","hearing","redevelopment",null,"A hearing is scheduled on December 13, 1993 to consider merging six redevelopment project areas into one merged project.","quoted","journalseptdecofproceed88sanfrich",348,"https://archive.org/details/journalseptdecofproceed88sanfrich/page/n348",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalseptdecofproceed88sanfrich:459/1",1993,1993,"1993-12-13","ordinance","redevelopment","continued","Proposed ordinance merging several redevelopment project areas, including Embarcadero-Lower Market, was continued to December 20, 1993.","unverified","journalseptdecofproceed88sanfrich",459,"https://archive.org/details/journalseptdecofproceed88sanfrich/page/n459",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalseptdecofproceed88sanfrich|173",1993,1993,"1993-12-20","resolution","land-and-building","refused","Merging the city's redevelopment project areas found environmentally harmless","quoted","journalseptdecofproceed88sanfrich",492,"https://archive.org/details/journalseptdecofproceed88sanfrich/page/n492",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,8.72],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed89sanfrich:42/4",1994,1994,"1994-05-09","ordinance","redevelopment","referred","Proposed ordinance would suspend hotel tax in certain redevelopment project areas and impose a 12 percent tax there; referred to Budget Committee.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed89sanfrich",42,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed89sanfrich/page/n42",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed89sanfrich:97/2",1994,1994,"1994-05-31","ordinance","redevelopment","passed","Ordinance temporarily suspends hotel occupancy tax in certain redevelopment project areas and sets a 12 percent hotel tax there; finally passed.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed89sanfrich",97,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed89sanfrich/page/n97",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-0.09],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich:94/2",1995,1995,"1995-10-02","resolution","redevelopment","referred","Resolution proposed finding no significant environmental impact from merging two South of Market and Embarcadero redevelopment project areas; referred to committee.","quoted","journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich",94,"https://archive.org/details/journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich/page/n91",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich:210/4",1996,1996,"1996-07-01","ordinance","redevelopment","passed first reading","Proposed ordinance would raise hotel occupancy tax by two percent, adding a two percent surcharge in redevelopment project areas, passed for second reading.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich",210,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich/page/n207",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,7.04],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915258:150/5",1998,1998,"","agency","environmental impact report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: Project review required for portions within existing Redevelopment Project Areas","unverified","C124915258",150,"https://archive.org/details/C124915258/page/n149",null,null,null,"Draft environmental impact statement/draft environmental impact report for the Third Street light rail project in the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesmayaug96sanfrich:215/4",2001,2001,"2001-06-18","resolution","redevelopment","referred","Maxwell and Peskin urged the Redevelopment Agency to apply city development policy equally to all areas, including existing Redevelopment Project Areas; referred.","quoted","meetingminutesmayaug96sanfrich",215,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesmayaug96sanfrich/page/n212",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2001sanf_0:243/3",2001,2001,"2001-06-25","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Resolution urges the Redevelopment Agency to apply city development policy equally across all redevelopment project areas.","quoted","meetingminutesb2001sanf_0",243,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2001sanf_0/page/n242",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,7.41],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101694856:134/1",2002,2002,"","measure","plan",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: Allocate at least 50% of increment funds for low and moderate income housing","unverified","C101694856",134,"https://archive.org/details/C101694856/page/n133",null,null,null,"Housing element : an element of the San Francisco general plan : draft for public review","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101694856:86/1",2002,2002,"","project","plan",null,"Better Neighborhoods pilot plan areas and eastern portion neighborhoods · other: areas that can absorb significant new housing development without adverse impacts","unverified","C101694856",86,"https://archive.org/details/C101694856/page/n85",null,null,null,"Housing element : an element of the San Francisco general plan : draft for public review","n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2002sanf_0:159/3",2002,2002,"2002-06-24","resolution","redevelopment","passed","The Redevelopment Agency's fiscal 2001-02 budget was increased by up to $16.5M (≈ $30.9 million in 2026 dollars) across all redevelopment project areas.","quoted","meetingminutesb2002sanf_0",159,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2002sanf_0/page/n158",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,9.66],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925579:148/2",2003,2003,"2003","measure","plan",null,"Housing Participation Policy · other: Affordable housing developed as part of market-rate housing in all redevelopment project areas, on-site or via in-lieu fee","unverified","C124925579",148,"https://archive.org/details/C124925579/page/n147",null,null,null,"Housing element : an element of the San Francisco general plan : final draft for public review","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101746510:186/1",2004,2004,"2004","measure","plan",null,"Redevelopment Agency affordable housing set-aside policy · other: at least 50% of increment funds for low and moderate income housing","unverified","C101746510",186,"https://archive.org/details/C101746510/page/n185",null,null,null,"Housing element : an element of the San Francisco general plan","n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingaprmay2005minutes100sanfrich:301/4",2005,2005,"2005-05-17","hearing","redevelopment","referred","Supervisor Mirkarimi requested a hearing on A2 Redevelopment Project Areas in Fillmore and Japantown; sent to Land Use committee.","quoted","meetingaprmay2005minutes100sanfrich",301,"https://archive.org/details/meetingaprmay2005minutes100sanfrich/page/n298",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjuneaug2007minutes102sanfrich:154/1",2007,2007,"2007-07-10","ordinance","redevelopment","passed","Passed ordinance limiting how the Redevelopment Agency may use eminent domain to acquire property in existing redevelopment project areas.","quoted","meetingjuneaug2007minutes102sanfrich",154,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjuneaug2007minutes102sanfrich/page/n154",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,7.79],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2007sanf_1:155/2",2007,2007,"2007-07-10","ordinance","redevelopment","passed","Ordinance limits how the Redevelopment Agency may use eminent domain to acquire property in existing redevelopment project areas; enacted.","quoted","meetingminutesb2007sanf_1",155,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2007sanf_1/page/n154",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,8.04]]}