{"id":null,"ids":[],"kind":"named in documents","name":"San Francisco neighborhood commercial districts","tied_by":"name","block":null,"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124895570:9/2",1983,1960,"1960","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco neighborhood commercial districts zoning provisions · other: permanent zoning provisions adopted in 1960 based on Department studies of the 1950s, except Union Street Special Use District","unverified","C124895570",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124895570/page/n8",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning study : proposed article of the planning code for neighborhood commercial districts","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124895589:5/1",1982,1960,"1960","event","study or report",null,"Neighborhood commercial zoning provisions · adopted: Adopted by the Board of Supervisors","unverified","C124895589",5,"https://archive.org/details/C124895589/page/n4",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning study : proposed zoning framework","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124895589:23/1",1982,1982,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Abbreviated conditional use procedure (neighborhood commercial districts) · recommendation: Zoning Administrator review and determination, appealable to CPC within 10 days","unverified","C124895589",23,"https://archive.org/details/C124895589/page/n22",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning study : proposed zoning framework","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124895589:39/10001",1982,1982,"","finding","study or report",null,"Special use controls · finding: temporary measure to alleviate problems in ten sensitive areas","unverified","C124895589",39,"https://archive.org/details/C124895589/page/n38",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning study : proposed zoning framework","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124895589:40/2",1982,1982,"","finding","study or report",null,"RC-1 zoning classification · finding: groups all upper stories together for conditional review without differentiating second, third and above","unverified","C124895589",40,"https://archive.org/details/C124895589/page/n39",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning study : proposed zoning framework","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124895589:40/3",1982,1982,"","finding","study or report",null,"RC-1 zoning classification · finding: permits only C-1 uses and prohibits signs and awnings","unverified","C124895589",40,"https://archive.org/details/C124895589/page/n39",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning study : proposed zoning framework","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124895589:5/3",1982,1982,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Abbreviated conditional use review process · recommendation: Institute an abbreviated conditional use review process in neighborhood commercial districts","unverified","C124895589",5,"https://archive.org/details/C124895589/page/n4",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning study : proposed zoning framework","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889705:12/3",1987,1982,"1982","finding","study or report",null,"Neighborhood commercial districts · other: over 75% of retail outlets, over 70% of retail sales, and over 70% of retail employees","unverified","C124889705",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124889705/page/n11",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning : economic impact assessment","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124895589:59/1",1982,1982,"1982","recommendation","study or report",null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning proposal · recommendation: incorporate special use controls into proposed neighborhood commercial zoning changes","unverified","C124895589",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124895589/page/n58",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning study : proposed zoning framework","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124895589:59/2",1982,1982,"1982","measure","study or report",null,"Vertical mix controls · other: regulate conversion of upper story residential uses to commercial use","unverified","C124895589",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124895589/page/n58",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning study : proposed zoning framework","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124895589:83/1",1982,1982,"1982","measure","study or report",null,"Neighborhood commercial zoning districts · height ft: Generally 40 feet; no substantial changes contemplated","unverified","C124895589",83,"https://archive.org/details/C124895589/page/n82",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning study : proposed zoning framework","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124895589:83/2",1982,1982,"1982","alternative","study or report",null,"Neighborhood commercial zoning districts · alternative: Square footage per establishment control alternatives: up to 5,000; 5,001-10,000; 10,001-25,000; 25,001+ sq.ft.","unverified","C124895589",83,"https://archive.org/details/C124895589/page/n82",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning study : proposed zoning framework","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124895589:83/3",1982,1982,"1982","alternative","study or report",null,"Neighborhood commercial zoning districts · alternative: Rear yard alternative: 25% of lot depth, but not less than 15 feet","unverified","C124895589",83,"https://archive.org/details/C124895589/page/n82",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning study : proposed zoning framework","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124895570:28/1",1983,1983,"","project","study or report",null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning study (Article 7 neighborhood commercial districts) · proposes: consolidate all existing neighborhood commercial use districts, controls, and authorizations into one Article of the Code","unverified","C124895570",28,"https://archive.org/details/C124895570/page/n27",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning study : proposed article of the planning code for neighborhood commercial districts","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124895570:9/1",1983,1983,"","project","study or report",null,"Neighborhood Commercial Rezoning Study · proposes: new proposed Article 7 consolidating neighborhood commercial control categories","unverified","C124895570",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124895570/page/n8",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning study : proposed article of the planning code for neighborhood commercial districts","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124895570:9/3",1983,1983,"March 1982","event","study or report",null,"Proposed Zoning Framework · event: First NCRS report published by the Department","unverified","C124895570",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124895570/page/n8",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning study : proposed article of the planning code for neighborhood commercial districts","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889705:12/2",1987,1985,"1985","finding","study or report",null,"Neighborhood commercial districts · other: at least $3 billion in sales in approximately 210 neighborhood districts","unverified","C124889705",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124889705/page/n11",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning : economic impact assessment","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889501:27/1",1986,1986,"1986","measure","ordinance or legislation",null,"Financial services spacing guideline · other: at least 500 feet apart","unverified","C124889501",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124889501/page/n26",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning : proposal for adoption","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889705:14/4",1987,1987,"","finding","study or report",null,"Neighborhood commercial districts outside Downtown · finding: Primary markets tend to be neighborhood in scale","unverified","C124889705",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124889705/page/n13",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning : economic impact assessment","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889705:15/6",1987,1987,"","finding","study or report",null,"Neighborhood commercial districts · finding: citywide patronage may be 5-10% of total patronage but a far larger share of recent retail growth","unverified","C124889705",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124889705/page/n14",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning : economic impact assessment","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889705:31/2",1987,1987,"","finding","study or report",null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning economic impact assessment · finding: Only 2 merchants reported being forced out of business because of exorbitant rent increases","unverified","C124889705",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124889705/page/n30",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning : economic impact assessment","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889705:31/3",1987,1987,"","finding","study or report",null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning economic impact assessment · finding: 28 of the merchants who commented on rents considered them reasonable","unverified","C124889705",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124889705/page/n30",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning : economic impact assessment","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889705:31/4",1987,1987,"","finding","study or report",null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning economic impact assessment · finding: 60 merchants interviewed, 43 of whom commented on rents","unverified","C124889705",31,"https://archive.org/details/C124889705/page/n30",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning : economic impact assessment","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889705:10/1",1987,1987,"1987","project","study or report",null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning · other: economic impact assessment of proposed rezoning in 20 neighborhood commercial districts","unverified","C124889705",10,"https://archive.org/details/C124889705/page/n9",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning : economic impact assessment","n","a",0,-4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889705:19/7",1987,1987,"1987","action","study or report",null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning · other: more restrictive than existing zoning for approximately 210 locations","unverified","C124889705",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124889705/page/n18",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning : economic impact assessment","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889705:14/1",1987,1987,"past 15 years","finding","study or report",null,"Neighborhood commercial districts · finding: Complementary relationship between districts and Downtown remained relatively stable","unverified","C124889705",14,"https://archive.org/details/C124889705/page/n13",null,null,null,"Neighborhood commercial rezoning : economic impact assessment","n","a",0,-4.0]]}