{"id":null,"ids":[],"kind":"named in documents","name":"San Francisco neighborhoods","tied_by":"name","block":null,"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:461/1",1973,1960,"1960","site","study or report",null,"San Francisco neighborhoods, 1960 census tract code · other: Neighborhood map with 1960 census tract codes (Ingleside, Mission, Downtown, Richmond, Western Addition, South of Market)","unverified","c123305332",461,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n456",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:414/1",1973,1960,"1960-1970","finding","study or report",null,"Office-type employment, San Francisco neighborhoods · other: South of Market: 45.9% increase in office-type employment","unverified","c123305332",414,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n409",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:414/2",1973,1960,"1960-1970","finding","study or report",null,"Office-type employment, San Francisco neighborhoods · other: Bernal Heights: 53.5% increase in office-type employment","unverified","c123305332",414,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n409",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:383/2",1973,1962,"1962","action","study or report",null,"Statistical presentation of neighborhood comparisons · other: indices of residential specialization (Hoover and Vernon method) compare neighborhood percentage spread to CBD percentage spread","unverified","c123305332",383,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n380",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:439/1",1973,1963,"1963-1972","property_record","study or report",null,"Typical rentals by unit type, residential buildings 10 stories and over (Keyser/Marston & Associates) · rent usd: Monthly contract rent ranges by unit type (studio to bedroom) for sample buildings in San Francisco neighborhoods, with rental data years 1963-1972","unverified","c123305332",439,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n434",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123314321:18/5",1971,1967,"1967","project","plan",null,"Federally Assisted Code Enforcement (FACE) · event: Begun in four San Francisco neighborhoods; 95% completed",null,"C123314321",18,"https://archive.org/details/C123314321/page/n17",null,null,null,"Workable program for community improvement : application and recertification, January 1, 1972-December 21, 1973","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123314321:18/10001",1971,1967,"1967; October, 1970","project","plan",null,"Federally Assisted Code Enforcement (FACE) · other: begun in four San Francisco neighborhoods; 95% completed","unverified","C123314321",18,"https://archive.org/details/C123314321/page/n17",null,null,null,"Workable program for community improvement : application and recertification, January 1, 1972-December 21, 1973","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:50/1",1970,1970,"","site","study or report",null,"Figure II-7 neighborhoods by official or popular designations · other: Map of San Francisco neighborhood areas by official or popular designations; popular area names have no precise boundaries","unverified","C124878408",50,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n49",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:212/10001",1970,1970,"1970","finding","study or report",null,"Health care system design for San Francisco neighborhoods · other: Hunter's Point-Bayview would have a larger direct-care budget than the Sunset","unverified","C124878301",212,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n211",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924502:17/1",1970,1970,"1970","project","study or report",null,"FACE Program · event: operating in seven San Francisco neighborhoods","unverified","C124924502",17,"https://archive.org/details/C124924502/page/n16",null,null,null,"FACE, Federally Assisted Code Enforcement (section 117 program) :b first phase: a summing up","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:384/1",1973,1970,"1970","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco neighborhoods place of work, 1970 census · other: Total employed residents 81,174; 26.0% work in CBD, 61.9% work elsewhere in S.F., 12.9% work outside S.F.","unverified","c123305332",384,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n381",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:394/1",1973,1970,"1970","finding","study or report",null,"Table D-5 Occupational distribution ranking of San Francisco neighborhoods, 1970 · other: Ranking of 15 San Francisco neighborhoods by occupational distribution (total, professional, managerial, sales, clerical and related categories), 1970","unverified","c123305332",394,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n389",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:398/8",1973,1970,"1970","finding","study or report",null,"Census ranking caveat · other: Ranking of Western Addition, Downtown and Bernal Heights house values is of dubious validity or not published due to small unit counts or disclosure","unverified","c123305332",398,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n393",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:463/1",1973,1970,"1970","site","study or report",null,"San Francisco neighborhoods, 1970 census tract code · other: Table maps San Francisco neighborhoods (Richmond, Marina, Downtown, Mission and others) to 1970 census tract numbers","unverified","c123305332",463,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n458",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:485/1",1973,1970,"1970","measure","study or report",null,"San Francisco neighborhoods owned vs. rented units · other: Distribution of owned vs. rented units by neighborhood, 1970 Census; data withheld (D) where owned units are few","unverified","c123305332",485,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n480",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:487/1",1973,1970,"1970","finding","study or report",null,"House value distribution, San Francisco neighborhoods · other: Table of 1970 house value distribution by San Francisco neighborhood (share over $25,000 and over $35,000); figures too garbled to attribute reliably","unverified","c123305332",487,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n482",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924502:17/3",1970,1970,"July 1969","project","study or report",null,"FACE Program · event: three additional areas brought into program","unverified","C124924502",17,"https://archive.org/details/C124924502/page/n16",null,null,null,"FACE, Federally Assisted Code Enforcement (section 117 program) :b first phase: a summing up","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924502:17/2",1970,1970,"March 1967","project","study or report",null,"FACE Program · event: inception in March 1967 with four initial neighborhoods","unverified","C124924502",17,"https://archive.org/details/C124924502/page/n16",null,null,null,"FACE, Federally Assisted Code Enforcement (section 117 program) :b first phase: a summing up","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124895561:11/3",1972,1972,"","finding","plan",null,"Recreation and park facilities distribution among neighborhoods · finding: serious inequity in the distribution of recreation facilities among the city's neighborhoods","unverified","C124895561",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124895561/page/n10",null,null,null,"Improvement plan for recreation & open space : a proposal for citizen review : the comprehensive plan of San Francisco","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:237/2",1970,1972,"1972","recommendation","study or report",null,"Department of Social Services decentralization · recommendation: about 14 district offices in neighborhood community centers","unverified","C124878301",237,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n236",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124895561:26/2",1972,1972,"1972","recommendation","plan",null,"Neighborhood recreation facilities · recommendation: High-need neighborhoods should be given priority in funding until substantial new funds are available","unverified","C124895561",26,"https://archive.org/details/C124895561/page/n25",null,null,null,"Improvement plan for recreation & open space : a proposal for citizen review : the comprehensive plan of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123309222:11/2",1973,1973,"","measure","study or report",null,"United Neighborhood Councils · proposes: moratoriums on further apartment houses in many neighborhoods","unverified","C123309222",11,"https://archive.org/details/C123309222/page/n10",null,null,null,"Environmental planning from the local to the regional level : the San Francisco Bay Area experience","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305323:97/2",1973,1973,"","finding","study or report",null,"CBD employment and housing prices in neighborhoods · finding: Increased CBD employment associated with housing price increases and construction activity in many neighborhoods","unverified","c123305323",97,"https://archive.org/details/c123305323/page/n96",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Summary : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:379/1",1973,1973,"1973","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco neighborhoods analysis · other: 15 neighborhoods established by City Planning Department used as basic units of analysis","unverified","c123305332",379,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n376",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:387/1",1973,1973,"1973","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco neighborhoods (access to CBD) · finding: Access to the CBD by public transit does not fully explain the ranking of percentage employed in the CBD","unverified","c123305332",387,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n384",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305332:387/6",1973,1973,"1973","measure","study or report",null,"San Francisco neighborhoods (traffic zones) · other: 161 traffic zones aggregated into 15 neighborhoods; average time to CBD center calculated","unverified","c123305332",387,"https://archive.org/details/c123305332/page/n384",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Volume III, Urban economics : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124884963:417/2",1975,1975,"","finding","study or report",null,"Vertical mixed use in San Francisco neighborhoods · finding: Vertical mixed use has occurred in many neighborhoods, with manufacturing or retailing on lower levels and residential activity on upper floors","unverified","C124884963",417,"https://archive.org/details/C124884963/page/n416",null,null,null,"Commercial and industrial activity in San Francisco : present characteristics and future trends : report to San Francisco Department of City Planning","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906269:85/2",1977,1977,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco neighborhoods · finding: some neighborhoods lacked any open areas to provide a break from dense urban development","unverified","C124906269",85,"https://archive.org/details/C124906269/page/n84",null,null,null,"National urban recreation study, San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124899682:87/10002",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART service coverage in San Francisco · finding: BART does not serve many San Francisco neighborhoods, so many residents/taxpayers do not have the opportunity to benefit","unverified","C124899682",87,"https://archive.org/details/C124899682/page/n86",null,null,null,"Land use and urban development project : program-wide case studies","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906117:32/2",1978,1978,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco neighborhoods on the Daly City BART line · finding: older communities that have not grown dramatically during the past fifteen years","unverified","C124906117",32,"https://archive.org/details/C124906117/page/n31",null,null,null,"Study of property acquisition and occupancy : BART's effect on speculation, working paper","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924274:4/8",1979,1979,"","finding","study or report",null,"SFPD district stations · finding: nine district police stations reduce effective police presence in San Francisco neighborhoods","unverified","C124924274",4,"https://archive.org/details/C124924274/page/n3",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco : review of the operations of the San Francisco Police Department","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c124896626:390/1",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco housing submarkets · other: housing substitutes for some San Francisco neighborhoods may be in Marin or the East Bay","unverified","c124896626",390,"https://archive.org/details/c124896626/page/n389",null,null,null,"Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco : downtown EIR consultant's report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/igsl_annual-report-sf-public-utilities_1983:21/2",1983,1983,"1983","project","annual report",null,"Public meetings on proposed changes to 15 service lines · other: outreach program to San Francisco neighborhoods on proposed changes to 15 service lines",null,"igsl_annual-report-sf-public-utilities_1983",21,"https://archive.org/details/igsl_annual-report-sf-public-utilities_1983/page/n20",null,null,null,"Annual report 1983","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:106/7",1984,1984,"","event","ordinance or legislation",null,"MUNI Metro · event: Opening of MUNI Metro as light-rail urban subway serving one-quarter of the City's neighborhoods","unverified","C124887761",106,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n105",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,0.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124879800:3/7",1985,1985,"","measure","plan",null,"Neighborhood open space · proposes: Acquire additional neighborhood park and recreation space, prioritizing areas that need them most","unverified","C124879800",3,"https://archive.org/details/C124879800/page/n2",null,null,null,"Recreation and open space element : proposal for citizen review : executive summary","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124879916:9/3",1985,1985,"","recommendation","plan",null,"High need neighborhoods · recommendation: Give priority for recreation improvements to high need neighborhoods most deficient in parkland","unverified","C124879916",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124879916/page/n8",null,null,null,"Recreation and open space element of the master plan : proposal for citizen review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124881943:41/1",1986,1986,"1986","site","study or report",null,"San Francisco neighborhoods (survey study areas) · other: divided into 18 neighborhoods using Community Planning Districts","unverified","C124881943",41,"https://archive.org/details/C124881943/page/n40",null,null,null,"Where the children play : a report on after-school recreational resources in San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124881943:7/1",1986,1986,"1986","project","study or report",null,"Where the children play: after-school recreational resources report · other: analysis of the specific after-school needs of 18 neighborhoods","unverified","C124881943",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124881943/page/n6",null,null,null,"Where the children play : a report on after-school recreational resources in San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124881943:79/3",1986,1986,"1986","finding","study or report",null,"Recreation index, neighborhood population figures · other: 1986 population estimates used due to dramatic demographic changes in the past six years in these areas","unverified","C124881943",79,"https://archive.org/details/C124881943/page/n78",null,null,null,"Where the children play : a report on after-school recreational resources in San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124881943:81/1",1986,1986,"1986","finding","study or report",null,"After-school programs in San Francisco neighborhoods · finding: Three neighborhoods do not have adequate after-school facilities; new centers are being planned there","unverified","C124881943",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124881943/page/n80",null,null,null,"Where the children play : a report on after-school recreational resources in San Francisco","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124881943:81/2",1986,1986,"1986","finding","study or report",null,"After-school programs in San Francisco neighborhoods · finding: Does not have adequate after-school facilities; new center being planned","unverified","C124881943",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124881943/page/n80",null,null,null,"Where the children play : a report on after-school recreational resources in San Francisco","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124881943:81/3",1986,1986,"1986","finding","study or report",null,"After-school programs in San Francisco neighborhoods · finding: Does not have adequate after-school facilities; new center being planned","unverified","C124881943",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124881943/page/n80",null,null,null,"Where the children play : a report on after-school recreational resources in San Francisco","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124881943:81/4",1986,1986,"1986","finding","study or report",null,"After-school programs in San Francisco neighborhoods · finding: Does not have adequate after-school facilities; no new facilities currently planned","unverified","C124881943",81,"https://archive.org/details/C124881943/page/n80",null,null,null,"Where the children play : a report on after-school recreational resources in San Francisco","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124881943:85/4",1986,1986,"1986","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco neighborhoods recreation services · finding: San Francisco's geographic neighborhoods are unevenly served; some areas with the greatest numbers of children have the fewest services","unverified","C124881943",85,"https://archive.org/details/C124881943/page/n84",null,null,null,"Where the children play : a report on after-school recreational resources in San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124904562:67/4",1990,1990,"","project","annual report",null,"neighborhood childcare centers · other: opening at the rate of one a month","unverified","C124904562",67,"https://archive.org/details/C124904562/page/n66",null,null,null,"Getting things done : visions & goals for San Francisco : a two-year progress report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124904702:151/1",1990,1990,"","finding","study or report",null,"Taxi use survey by San Francisco neighborhood · finding: Average number of days per week respondents use a cab, by neighborhood (values partly garbled in scan; neighborhoods include Chinatown, Excelsior, Haight Ashbury, Mission, Richmond, Sunset, Downtown/Civic Center)","unverified","C124904702",151,"https://archive.org/details/C124904702/page/n150",null,null,null,"Taxi industry analysis, City of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101696845:7/2",1994,1990,"1990","finding","study or report",null,"Hunger in San Francisco neighborhoods · finding: largest absolute number of hungry persons in poverty resides in the Sunset/Richmond and Mission areas","unverified","C101696845",7,"https://archive.org/details/C101696845/page/n6",null,null,null,"Hunger in San Francisco : fragmented services, unmet needs","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101696845:7/3",1994,1990,"1990","finding","study or report",null,"Hunger in San Francisco neighborhoods · finding: Sunset/Richmond and Mission areas together account for one third of the city's total hungry population","unverified","C101696845",7,"https://archive.org/details/C101696845/page/n6",null,null,null,"Hunger in San Francisco : fragmented services, unmet needs","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124904702:153/1",1990,1990,"1990","finding","study or report",null,"Taxi availability survey by neighborhood · other: Neighborhood ratings of taxi availability range from EXCELLENT to POOR; Diamond Heights rated GOOD, Western Addition rated POOR, Bayview rated POOR","unverified","C124904702",153,"https://archive.org/details/C124904702/page/n152",null,null,null,"Taxi industry analysis, City of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101696845:5/4",1994,1994,"","finding","study or report",null,"Hunger in San Francisco study · finding: Every neighborhood in San Francisco is home to hungry individuals and families","unverified","C101696845",5,"https://archive.org/details/C101696845/page/n4",null,null,null,"Hunger in San Francisco : fragmented services, unmet needs","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanaprofproceed89sanfrich:174/1",1994,1994,"1994-02-22","resolution",null,"referred","Resolution urging curbside recycling extended to all San Francisco neighborhoods, including Chinatown, was referred to the Board.","quoted","journaljanaprofproceed89sanfrich",174,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanaprofproceed89sanfrich/page/n173",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124918065:11/2",1995,1994,"1994/95","project","other",null,"Horticulture Therapy program · other: Prisoners grow trees for DPW's Urban Forestry neighborhood plantings","unverified","C124918065",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124918065/page/n10",null,null,null,"Summary of inmate programs","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915586:1/4",1995,1995,"June 22, 1995","event","other",null,"Select Committee on Charter Reform · other: five neighborhood night meetings held","unverified","C124915586",1,"https://archive.org/details/C124915586/page/n0",null,null,null,"The charter of the City and County of San Francisco : [proposal of the Select Committee on Charter Reform of the Board of Supervisors, with accompanying material]","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914254:44/10001",1995,1995,"March 11, 1995","event","study or report",null,"Elections Task Force · event: five community meetings beginning March 11 in neighborhoods","unverified","C124914254",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124914254/page/n43",null,null,null,"A report of the Elections Task Force to the Board of Supervisors, city and county of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916243:10/1",1997,1997,"As of March 1997","event","plan",null,"Neighborhood Emergency Response Teams (NERT) · other: about 4500 people in San Francisco neighborhoods completed training","unverified","C124916243",10,"https://archive.org/details/C124916243/page/n9",null,null,null,"Community safety : implementation programs : an element of the Master plan of the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922708:151/2",2000,2000,"2000","action","plan",null,"[name withheld] · proposes: fostering the creation of delivery centers in San Francisco neighborhoods","unverified","C124922708",151,"https://archive.org/details/C124922708/page/n150",null,null,null,"San Francisco countywide transportation plan : draft for public review","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922708:125/1",2000,2000,"Year 2020","finding","plan",null,"Strategy 2 · finding: Average travel times between SF neighborhoods and regional destinations in 2020 nearly unchanged vs. Strategy 1; highest increase under 1 percent, highest decrease about 3 percent","unverified","C124922708",125,"https://archive.org/details/C124922708/page/n124",null,null,null,"San Francisco countywide transportation plan : draft for public review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925153:43/1",2001,2001,"","finding","study or report",null,"Rental housing in San Francisco neighborhoods · finding: Rents most affordable in south central and eastern neighborhoods and parts of the Richmond and Sunset Districts","unverified","C124925153",43,"https://archive.org/details/C124925153/page/n42",null,null,null,"Data and needs analysis : part one of the Housing element revision : an element of the San Francisco general plan","n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutes96septdecsanfrich:195/5",2001,2001,"2001-10-29","resolution",null,"referred","Supervisors Sandoval, Daly and Newsom proposed a resolution commending the Coalition for San Francisco Neighborhoods; referred for adoption.","quoted","meetingminutes96septdecsanfrich",195,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutes96septdecsanfrich/page/n186",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2001sanf_1:187/5",2001,2001,"2001-10-29","resolution",null,"referred","A resolution commending the Coalition for San Francisco Neighborhoods for over 29 years of service was referred to the next meeting.","quoted","meetingminutesb2001sanf_1",187,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2001sanf_1/page/n186",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutes96septdecsanfrich:218/4",2001,2001,"2001-11-05","resolution",null,null,"Resolution commending the Coalition for San Francisco Neighborhoods for over 29 years of community service.","quoted","meetingminutes96septdecsanfrich",218,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutes96septdecsanfrich/page/n209",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2001sanf_1:210/4",2001,2001,"2001-11-05","resolution",null,"passed","Board commends the Coalition for San Francisco Neighborhoods for over 29 years of community service.","quoted","meetingminutesb2001sanf_1",210,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2001sanf_1/page/n209",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2001sanf_1:211/6",2001,2001,"2001-11-05","resolution",null,"passed","Resolution commending the Coalition for San Francisco Neighborhoods for over 29 years of community service was adopted.","quoted","meetingminutesb2001sanf_1",211,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2001sanf_1/page/n210",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.25],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919324:58/3",1997,2002,"2002","measure","plan",null,"Consumer food co-ops · other: Two consumer food co-ops operating in two San Francisco neighborhoods with the highest need","unverified","C124919324",58,"https://archive.org/details/C124919324/page/n57",null,null,null,"The sustainability plan for the city of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingmins20042005sanf:229/1",2004,2004,"2004-07-15","hearing",null,null,"City Services Committee filed a hearing request on a Controller community audit of Southeast San Francisco neighborhoods.","quoted","meetingmins20042005sanf",229,"https://archive.org/details/meetingmins20042005sanf/page/n228",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2005sanf:17/4",2005,2005,null,"resolution",null,"passed","Supervisor Dufty proposes asking the City Controller to audit needs in Southeast San Francisco neighborhoods.","quoted","meetingminutesbo2005sanf",17,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2005sanf/page/n16",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesdr2007sanf:46/1",2007,2007,"2007-01-23","resolution",null,"referred","Proposed STOP signs at eight intersections across San Francisco neighborhoods, referred to the City Operations committee.","quoted","meetingminutesdr2007sanf",46,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesdr2007sanf/page/n45",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesd2008sanf_0:378/1",2008,2008,"2008-11-25","resolution","health","passed","Resolution urging transit and health agencies to plan health-protective truck routes in Southeast San Francisco neighborhoods was adopted.","quoted","meetingminutesd2008sanf_0",378,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesd2008sanf_0/page/n377",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.89],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922708:123/1",2000,2020,"2020","finding","plan",null,"Average auto travel times between San Francisco neighborhoods, Strategy 1 vs Strategy 2 · finding: Practically the same; largest change 0.5 percent","unverified","C124922708",123,"https://archive.org/details/C124922708/page/n122",null,null,null,"San Francisco countywide transportation plan : draft for public review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922708:123/2",2000,2020,"2020","finding","plan",null,"Changes in average travel times between San Francisco neighborhoods, Strategy 1 and Strategy 2 · finding: Percent change in average travel time by neighborhood, Strategy 1 vs Strategy 2, Year 2020 (Exhibit 7-5)","unverified","C124922708",123,"https://archive.org/details/C124922708/page/n122",null,null,null,"San Francisco countywide transportation plan : draft for public review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922708:159/1",2000,2020,"2020","finding","plan",null,"Average travel times between San Francisco neighborhoods, Strategy 2 vs. Strategies 3 & 4 · finding: Changes in average travel times from indicated neighborhood to other San Francisco neighborhoods (exhibit 9-3, no values printed)","unverified","C124922708",159,"https://archive.org/details/C124922708/page/n158",null,null,null,"San Francisco countywide transportation plan : draft for public review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922708:161/1",2000,2020,"2020","finding","plan",null,"San Francisco Transportation Plan Appendix A Exhibit 9-4 · finding: Increase in average travel times from San Francisco neighborhoods to representative regional destinations, Year 2020, between strategies (table, values not legible on page)","unverified","C124922708",161,"https://archive.org/details/C124922708/page/n160",null,null,null,"San Francisco countywide transportation plan : draft for public review","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922708:47/5",2000,2020,"2020","finding","plan",null,"Auto travel times between San Francisco neighborhoods · finding: increase by up to six percent","unverified","C124922708",47,"https://archive.org/details/C124922708/page/n46",null,null,null,"San Francisco countywide transportation plan : draft for public review","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922708:47/6",2000,2020,"2020","finding","plan",null,"Travel times between San Francisco neighborhoods and regional destinations · finding: increase up to 22 percent; highest increases on trips to/from the East Bay and North Bay","unverified","C124922708",47,"https://archive.org/details/C124922708/page/n46",null,null,null,"San Francisco countywide transportation plan : draft for public review","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922708:51/1",2000,2020,"2020","finding","plan",null,"Future baseline transportation conditions, Exhibit 3-5 · other: Percent increase in average travel times from San Francisco neighborhoods to [name withheld], San Jose, Berkeley and Airport, 1998 to 2020 baseline","unverified","C124922708",51,"https://archive.org/details/C124922708/page/n50",null,null,null,"San Francisco countywide transportation plan : draft for public review","n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:leg091526|68",2026,2026,"2026-09-15","resolution","running-the-city",null,"State urged to protect San Francisco neighborhoods' grant eligibility under CalEnviroScreen","unverified",null,null,"https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=M&ID=1443265&GUID=0C2E6B6A-5410-4AF3-BBA4-686E9ADB594A",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0]]}