{"id":null,"ids":[],"kind":"named in documents","name":"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","tied_by":"name","block":null,"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:40/1",1992,1948,"1948","agency","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: established by the Board of Supervisors","unverified","C124903911",40,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n39",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123314419:19/1",1954,1954,"1954","agency","other",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: office open to the public at 512 Golden Gate Avenue, 8:30 AM - 5:15 PM Monday thru Friday","unverified","C123314419",19,"https://archive.org/details/C123314419/page/n18","512 Golden Gate Avenue",null,null,"You asked about redevelopment in San Francisco ... here are the answers","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124886280:1/2",1957,1957,"May 1957","agency","plan",null,"San Francisco Department of City Planning and San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · lead agency: prepared by the staff of the San Francisco Department of City Planning and the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","unverified","C124886280",1,"https://archive.org/details/C124886280/page/n0",null,null,null,"A preliminary plan for a project in the South of Market Redevelopment Area \"D\" : report to the City Planning Commission and the Redevelopment Agency","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885392:13/5",1961,1961,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Architectural Advisory Panel · other: select and pay compensation for the ten best designs","unverified","C124885392",13,"https://archive.org/details/C124885392/page/n12",null,null,null,"Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124924478:151/1",1964,1964,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: Redevelopment agency office, San Francisco","unverified","C124924478",151,"https://archive.org/details/C124924478/page/n150","525 Golden Gate Avenue",null,null,"Report on the redevelopment plan for the Western Addition approved redevelopment project area A-2","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:312/1",1970,1970,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: temporary organization under California Community Redevelopment Law, not tied into city structure","unverified","C124878301",312,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n311",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,-3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:312/2",1970,1970,"","action","study or report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: Redevelopment area designation usually initiated by citizens petitioning the Board of Supervisors","unverified","C124878301",312,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n311",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:313/3",1970,1970,"","finding","study or report",null,"Rehabilitation Division, San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · cost usd: average $6000 per dwelling unit for assistance services","unverified","C124878301",313,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n312",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:313/7",1970,1970,"","finding","study or report",null,"Rehabilitation Division, San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: 38% of new units entering the Western Addition housing stock","unverified","C124878301",313,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n312",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:100/2",1970,1970,"","action","study or report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · proposes: plans for Western Addition A-2 area","unverified","C124878408",100,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n99",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:102/4",1970,1970,"","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: makes most of its plans before and sends completed plans to WAPAC for approval, often too far along to change","unverified","C124878408",102,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n101",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:137/2",1970,1970,"","measure","study or report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency redevelopment area · other: 50 percent of work force must be residents of the Area","unverified","C124878408",137,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n136",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:137/3",1970,1970,"","measure","study or report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency contracts · other: contractor must hire one resident trainee for each non-resident employee","unverified","C124878408",137,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n136",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:27/1",1970,1970,"1970","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: named as object of community hatred in the community organizing discussion","unverified","C124878301",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n26",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:28/1",1970,1970,"1970","finding","study or report",null,"Economic Opportunity Council, San Francisco Redevelopment Agency and City Hall · finding: approach has been to confront the problems of the poor where they are, in the Western Addition, the Mission, Chinatown, South of Market and Hunters Point","unverified","C124878301",28,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n27",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878301:28/3",1970,1970,"1970","finding","study or report",null,"Economic Opportunity Council, San Francisco Redevelopment Agency and City Hall · finding: efforts of these agencies have only confirmed the inability of people outside the target area to generate programs meeting needs","unverified","C124878301",28,"https://archive.org/details/C124878301/page/n27",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:101/4",1970,1970,"December 1967","event","study or report",null,"WACO v. San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · event: suit filed by Legal Assistance Foundation on behalf of WACO over relocation plan","unverified","C124878408",101,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n100",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:101/10001",1970,1970,"December 1969","finding","study or report",null,"WACO lawsuit against San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: [name withheld] ruled in favor of WACO and issued an injunction withholding federal funds until requirements were met","unverified","C124878408",101,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n100",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","m",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124878408:101/5",1970,1970,"December 1969","event","study or report",null,"WACO v. San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: decision in favor of WACO; injunction issued by [name withheld]","unverified","C124878408",101,"https://archive.org/details/C124878408/page/n100",null,null,null,"Housing and urban resource development for the city of San Francisco : an interdisciplinary study in systems design at Stanford University, winter and spring quarters 1970 : final report","n","m",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123314321:65/1",1971,1971,"","measure","plan",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Section 236 housing rent supplements · other: Base rents reduced by as much as 70 percent","unverified","C123314321",65,"https://archive.org/details/C123314321/page/n64",null,null,null,"Workable program for community improvement : application and recertification, January 1, 1972-December 21, 1973","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123314321:71/3",1971,1971,"March 31, 1970","agency","plan",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Resolution No. 53-70 · adopted: ratified the City's housing policy","unverified","C123314321",71,"https://archive.org/details/C123314321/page/n70",null,null,null,"Workable program for community improvement : application and recertification, January 1, 1972-December 21, 1973","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101696058:14/3",1973,1973,"","agency","other",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: published Do It Yourself Guide to several renewal areas","unverified","C101696058",14,"https://archive.org/details/C101696058/page/n13",null,null,null,"Stroll through five redevelopment highlights in San Francisco with Margot Patterson Doss","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124884875:104/1",1975,1975,"2/21/75 - 6/30/75","project","study or report",null,"Hunters Point NDP A-5 project (San Francisco Redevelopment Agency) · cost usd: 2,211,000","unverified","C124884875",104,"https://archive.org/details/C124884875/page/n103",null,null,null,"Grants report : How much of what is in the second city budget","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124884875:104/2",1975,1975,"7/1/74 - 6/30/75","project","study or report",null,"Rehabilitation Loans (San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, Section 312) · cost usd: $340,000 received and expended; $200,000 committed but not received","unverified","C124884875",104,"https://archive.org/details/C124884875/page/n103",null,null,null,"Grants report : How much of what is in the second city budget","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124901630:4/3",1977,1977,"","project","other",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency low-interest loan program · other: 200 more homes and apartment houses remain to be restored","unverified","C124901630",4,"https://archive.org/details/C124901630/page/n3",null,null,null,"Preservation","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123313974:6/1",1979,1979,"","site","other",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency art requirement · other: developers set aside one per cent of construction costs for publicly-accessible works of art","unverified","C123313974",6,"https://archive.org/details/C123313974/page/n5",null,null,null,"Art in San Francisco redevelopment areas","n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed76sanfrich:23/1",1981,1981,"1981-01-05","appointment",null,"passed","Mayor's appointees Melvin Dong Lee and Walter S. Newman confirmed to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency.","quoted","journaljanjuneofproceed76sanfrich",23,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed76sanfrich/page/n22",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,5.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed76sanfrich:769/4",1981,1981,"1981-06-29","appointment","redevelopment","passed","The Board confirmed Mayor Feinstein's appointment of Jesse Arnelle to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency.","quoted","journaljanjuneofproceed76sanfrich",769,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed76sanfrich/page/n768",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,7.16],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljulydecofproceed76sanfrich:317/4",1981,1981,"1981-10-05","appointment",null,"passed","Board confirms Mayor's appointment of Charlotte Berk as a member of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency.","quoted","journaljulydecofproceed76sanfrich",317,"https://archive.org/details/journaljulydecofproceed76sanfrich/page/n316",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,5.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich:505/4",1983,1983,"1983-11-07","appointment",null,null,"Mayor appointed [name withheld] to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for a four-year term ending September 3, 1987.","quoted","journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich",505,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed78julydecsanfrich/page/n502",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich:283/1",1985,1985,"1985-03-04","appointment",null,"passed","Dorman L. Commons was appointed to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency to fill [name withheld] unexpired term.","quoted","journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich",283,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich/page/n272",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,5.3],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:103/1",1992,1986,"1986 to 1991","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: clerical staff share grew 15 percent","unverified","C124903911",103,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n102",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:96/2",1992,1986,"1986 to 1991","agency","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: professional staff decreased from 78 to 65","unverified","C124903911",96,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n95",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:96/3",1992,1986,"1986 to FY 1991-92","agency","audit",null,"Engineering and Rehabilitation unit, San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: unit reduced from 19 staff to six staff","unverified","C124903911",96,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n95",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124889583:7/1",1987,1987,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: made rental housing a priority in recent years","unverified","C124889583",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124889583/page/n6",null,null,null,"Bay Area rental housing : will the boom continue?","n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed82septdecsanfrich:379/1",1987,1987,"1987-11-30","appointment",null,"passed","Haig G. Mardikian was confirmed as Mayor's appointee to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for a term ending 1991.","quoted","journalofproceed82septdecsanfrich",379,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed82septdecsanfrich/page/n378",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,8.38],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:61/1",1992,1988,"1988","event","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: In 1988 the Agency requested Board authorization to shift funds for new services in Fisherman's Wharf","unverified","C124903911",61,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n60",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:46/2",1992,1989,"1989","action","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency mission statement · adopted: Totally new mission statement adopted by the Agency and formally approved by the Board of Supervisors","unverified","C124903911",46,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n45",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:5/5",1992,1989,"1989-90 through 2000","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency bond financing · cost usd: over $306 million more than pay-as-you-go method","unverified","C124903911",5,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n4",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:50/1",1992,1989,"FY 1989-90","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: $39,199,217 in tax increment-backed bonds sold","unverified","C124903911",50,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n49",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885198:89/4",1984,1990,"1990","agency","plan",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · proposes: goal to develop 5,696 units by 1990 on redevelopment vacant sites","unverified","C124885198",89,"https://archive.org/details/C124885198/page/n88",null,null,null,"Residence : the residence element of the comprehensive plan of the city and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124885198:89/5",1984,1990,"1990","agency","plan",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: 1,315 units for low- and moderate-income households","unverified","C124885198",89,"https://archive.org/details/C124885198/page/n88",null,null,null,"Residence : the residence element of the comprehensive plan of the city and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:100/2",1992,1990,"1990","event","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency voice mail system · other: Voice mail telephone answering system implemented","unverified","C124903911",100,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n99",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124902980:91/1",1990,1990,"6/1/90","action","study or report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency operating plan · other: Develop operating plan, to be completed by 6/1/90","unverified","C124902980",91,"https://archive.org/details/C124902980/page/n90",null,null,null,"Report to the Board of Supervisors, city and county of San Francisco : review and analysis of the Deputy Mayor function in the Office of the Mayor","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:50/2",1992,1990,"FY 1990-91","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: $22,995,819 in tax increment-backed bonds sold","unverified","C124903911",50,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n49",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:52/4",1992,1990,"FY 1990-91","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency unneeded tax increment funds · other: approximately $25,010,334 in FY 1990-91, retained by the General Fund","unverified","C124903911",52,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n51",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:60/1",1992,1990,"FY 1990-91","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency budget · approved: approximately $98 million budget approved by Board of Supervisors","unverified","C124903911",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n59",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:60/2",1992,1990,"FY 1990-91","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency budget · cost usd: revised by 58 percent to approximately $41 million","unverified","C124903911",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n59",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:64/1",1992,1990,"FY 1990-91","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Agency accumulated $3,290,000 in interest income not included in its budget","unverified","C124903911",64,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n63",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124904562:18/1",1990,1990,"Last summer","finding","annual report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: issued $10 million in tax increment bonds for housing","unverified","C124904562",18,"https://archive.org/details/C124904562/page/n17",null,null,null,"Getting things done : visions & goals for San Francisco : a two-year progress report","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903568:26/1",1991,1991,"","measure","other",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Small Business Loan Program · other: Loan amount cannot exceed $50,000 or $100,000 with a companion loan","unverified","C124903568",26,"https://archive.org/details/C124903568/page/n25",null,null,null,"A guide to City Hall, city & county of San Francisco","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124904359:26/2",1991,1991,"","recommendation","plan",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Percent for Art guidelines · proposes: formalize and make explicit its Percent for Art guidelines","unverified","C124904359",26,"https://archive.org/details/C124904359/page/n25",null,null,null,"Proposed arts policy for the city and county of San Francisco : proposal for adoption","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124905450:146/2",1991,1991,"","agency","plan",null,"Mayor's Office of Housing and San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · event: annual reports of affordable housing funding activity based on July 1 - June 30 fiscal year","unverified","C124905450",146,"https://archive.org/details/C124905450/page/n145",null,null,null,"1992 comprehensive housing affordability strategy, city and county of San Francisco","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124905450:166/1",1991,1991,"","agency","plan",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: adopted redevelopment plans in five areas, four of which include a significant number of planned housing units","unverified","C124905450",166,"https://archive.org/details/C124905450/page/n165",null,null,null,"1992 comprehensive housing affordability strategy, city and county of San Francisco","n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich:25/2",1991,1991,"1991-05-06","motion","redevelopment","referred","Motion to have the Budget Analyst audit the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency was referred to Finance Committee for May 15, 1991.","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich",25,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich/page/n24",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich:82/1",1991,1991,"1991-05-20","motion","redevelopment","continued","Management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, sponsored by Supervisor Maher, continued to May 28, 1991.","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich",82,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich/page/n81",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich:113/3",1991,1991,"1991-05-28","motion","redevelopment",null,"Supervisor Maher moved that the Budget Analyst prepare a management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency.","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich",113,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich/page/n112",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:45/4",1992,1991,"1991-92","agency","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: Tax increment bond requirement to balance proposed expenditures $26,900,000","unverified","C124903911",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n44",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:51/3",1992,1991,"1991-92","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency bond needs · other: $118,091,035 to $139,948,174 present value bond needs through 2000 (7% to 5% discount rates)","unverified","C124903911",51,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n50",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:51/4",1992,1991,"1991-92","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency tax increment needs · other: $118,091,035 to $170,547,383 present value tax increment monies over 30 years (7% to 5% discount rates)","unverified","C124903911",51,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n50",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:56/6",1992,1991,"1991-92","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency existing projects · cost usd: $118 million to $139 million total estimated bond needs through 2000, discounted 1991-92 dollars","unverified","C124903911",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n55",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:44/1",1992,1991,"FY 1991-92","agency","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · cost usd: $131,848,000 Agency budget FY 1991-92","unverified","C124903911",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n43",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:44/10001",1992,1991,"FY 1991-92","agency","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · cost usd: Total budget $131,848,000","unverified","C124903911",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n43",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:44/10003",1992,1991,"FY 1991-92","agency","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: Revenues $104,948,000, mostly property sales","unverified","C124903911",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n43",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:44/3",1992,1991,"FY 1991-92","agency","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: $104,948,000 in revenues, mainly property sales of Agency property","unverified","C124903911",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n43",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:44/4",1992,1991,"FY 1991-92","agency","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: $26,900,000 provided from sale of Agency tax increment bonds","unverified","C124903911",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n43",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:50/3",1992,1991,"FY 1991-92","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: $26,900,000 in tax increment-backed bonds sold","unverified","C124903911",50,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n49",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:97/1",1992,1991,"FY 1991-92","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · cost usd: approximately $1.4 million annually in salaries and fringe benefits for 32 clerical positions","unverified","C124903911",97,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n96",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101693506:87/2",1992,1992,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: would not be able to fund the buildings as planned","unverified","C101693506",87,"https://archive.org/details/C101693506/page/n86",null,null,null,"A management audit of the Center for the Arts at Yerba Buena Gardens","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:100/3",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency professional staff · other: 79 percent of professional staff have a computer terminal at their desk","unverified","C124903911",100,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n99",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:100/4",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency secretarial staff · finding: Secretarial staff percentage higher by approximately 17 percent than other California redevelopment agencies","unverified","C124903911",100,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n99",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:101/1",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency clerical staff · finding: The Agency has not conducted a workload study of its clerical staff","unverified","C124903911",101,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n100",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:101/2",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency clerical staff · finding: approximately 30 percent (32 of 108 positions)","unverified","C124903911",101,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n100",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:101/4",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Central Records · recommendation: contract with a private firm for document microfilming; two Central Records positions could be eliminated","unverified","C124903911",101,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n100",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:101/5",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency project area administrative units · finding: one secretarial staff for two professionals in project units; one secretary to six or eight professionals in other divisions","unverified","C124903911",101,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n100",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:101/6",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Executive Director's office · finding: three secretarial staff plus an executive assistant","unverified","C124903911",101,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n100",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:103/10001",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency clerical staff · recommendation: Reduce Agency clerical staffing levels by eight positions","unverified","C124903911",103,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n102",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:103/10002",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"Classification study · cost usd: $50,000 to $65,000","unverified","C124903911",103,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n102",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:103/10003",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"Strategic plan · cost usd: up to $65,000",null,"C124903911",103,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n102",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:103/10004",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"Review of Executive Secretary positions · cost usd: no more than $25,000","unverified","C124903911",103,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n102",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:103/10005",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"Recommendations package (studies and review) · cost usd: estimated total maximum cost of $155,000","unverified","C124903911",103,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n102",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:103/2",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: clerical and secretarial staffing about 72 percent greater than similar City departments","unverified","C124903911",103,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n102",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:103/3",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: approximately 17 percent more secretarial staff than other California redevelopment agencies","unverified","C124903911",103,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n102",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:103/4",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: clerical staff 29.6 percent (32 of 108 positions)","unverified","C124903911",103,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n102",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:103/5",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: reduce clerical staff to 24 percent (24 of 100 positions)","unverified","C124903911",103,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n102",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:103/7",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: reduce Agency clerical staffing levels by eight positions",null,"C124903911",103,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n102",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:104/6",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"Reduction of eight Agency clerical positions · other: annual savings of approximately $350,000","unverified","C124903911",104,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n103",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:104/7",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"Reduction of eight Agency clerical positions including two Central Records staff · other: actual savings would total $300,000","unverified","C124903911",104,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n103",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:104/8",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"Executive Secretary II positions in non-executive units · recommendation: downward reclassification of five Executive Secretary II positions","unverified","C124903911",104,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n103",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:120/1",1992,1992,"","agency","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: Executive Director salary, first step: $98,202 (salary comparison table; San Francisco column)","unverified","C124903911",120,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n119",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:124/2",1992,1992,"","action","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · proposes: Participate in multi-agency planning efforts including Fishermans Wharf area and South Bayshore","unverified","C124903911",124,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n123",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:125/2",1992,1992,"","measure","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency housing funds · other: Affordability period of at least 50 years for assisted housing","unverified","C124903911",125,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n124",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:27/1",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: approximately 12 percent of Agency staff receiving compensation in excess of $70,000 annually","unverified","C124903911",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n26",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:27/5",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: excessive number of Executive Secretaries","unverified","C124903911",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n26",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:3/2",1992,1992,"","project","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency redevelopment projects · other: five redevelopment projects completed within the City","unverified","C124903911",3,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n2",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:43/1",1992,1992,"","agency","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Commission · other: separately established seven member governing commission","unverified","C124903911",43,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n42",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:43/2",1992,1992,"","agency","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Commission · approved: approves all policy decisions, senior staff hiring, most Agency expenditures, and all agreements, contracts, grants and loans","unverified","C124903911",43,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n42",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:49/1",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · cost usd: approximately $89,095,036 in bonds issued","unverified","C124903911",49,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n48",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:49/2",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · cost usd: approximately $7,179,849 annual tax increment to repay bonds","unverified","C124903911",49,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n48",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:49/4",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · cost usd: $524,872,666 tax increment monies needed to repay bonds over 30 years in nominal dollars","unverified","C124903911",49,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n48",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:5/1",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency tax increment bonds · cost usd: approximately $89.1 million in bonds issued to date","unverified","C124903911",5,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n4",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:5/2",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency tax increment bonds · cost usd: approximately $7.18 million annually in tax increment revenues to repay bonds","unverified","C124903911",5,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n4",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:50/4",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: $89,095,036 total tax increment-backed bonds sold to date","unverified","C124903911",50,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n49",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:56/2",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · cost usd: approximately $89,095,036 in bonds issued to date","unverified","C124903911",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n55",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:56/3",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · cost usd: $7,179,849 annually in tax increment revenues to repay bonds over 30 years","unverified","C124903911",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n55",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:56/5",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency existing projects · cost usd: $524,872,666 tax increment monies to repay bonds over 30 years, nominal dollars","unverified","C124903911",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n55",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:59/1",1992,1992,"","measure","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: Commission approval required for every expenditure over $20,000","unverified","C124903911",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n58",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:59/2",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Budget changes during fiscal year in violation of State Health and Safety Code Section 33606","unverified","C124903911",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n58",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:59/3",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Require Agency to obtain Board of Supervisors approval of significant budget revisions","unverified","C124903911",59,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n58",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:60/7",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: budget is amended without State mandated approval of amendments by the Board of Supervisors","unverified","C124903911",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n59",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:60/8",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Agency does not submit required quarterly expenditure and revenue reports to the Board of Supervisors","unverified","C124903911",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n59",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:60/9",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency proposed budget · finding: budget document does not provide sufficient information to effectively evaluate the proposed budget","unverified","C124903911",60,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n59",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:61/3",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Agency does not submit quarterly reports to the Board of Supervisors","unverified","C124903911",61,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n60",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:61/4",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: City Administrative Code Section 24.3 requires quarterly reports to the Board of Supervisors on all transactions","unverified","C124903911",61,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n60",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:61/5",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Bring any project expenditure increase beyond ten percent of budgeted funds before the Board of Supervisors","unverified","C124903911",61,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n60",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:61/6",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Submit a quarterly report to the Board of Supervisors","unverified","C124903911",61,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n60",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:63/1",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency budget · finding: Agency does not include actual project expenditures and revenues from previous fiscal years in annual budget submitted to Board of Supervisors","unverified","C124903911",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n62",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:63/2",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency financial computer system · finding: Financial computer system does not roll up individual expenditure line items into accounts presented to the Board of Supervisors","unverified","C124903911",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n62",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:63/3",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency budget · finding: Budget Analyst request for three years of data required almost one month to prepare","unverified","C124903911",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n62",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:63/4",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency budget · finding: Board of Supervisors does not know if approved budget is spent in accordance with approved work program","unverified","C124903911",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n62",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:63/5",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency budget policy · finding: Agency brings budget items to Board of Supervisors only for new program categories, not when funds shift between established programs","unverified","C124903911",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n62",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:63/7",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency annual budget · recommendation: Include data from previous two fiscal years, including actual revenues and expenditures, in annual budget submitted to Board of Supervisors","unverified","C124903911",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n62",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:64/2",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Substantive budget revisions made without Board of Supervisors approval, some in violation of State Code","unverified","C124903911",64,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n63",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:64/3",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Submit financial quarterly reports and include actual expenditures and revenues and five year projections in annual budget","unverified","C124903911",64,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n63",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:65/1",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Direct the Deputy Executive Director for Finance to submit quarterly reports to the Board of Supervisors at a Finance Committee hearing, including actual expenditures and revenues and changes over 10 percent","unverified","C124903911",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n64",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:65/2",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Include actual expenditures and revenues from the previous two years, encumbered and unencumbered carry forward funds, bond interest income, and five-year projections in the annual budget","unverified","C124903911",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n64",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:65/3",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Amend the Administrative Code to require Board of Supervisors approval of project account transfers over 10 percent of the originally approved annual budget amount, and of any positions created during the fiscal year","unverified","C124903911",65,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n64",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:67/1",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Agency does not submit an annual report to the Board of Supervisors, in violation of Health and Safety Code Section 33080.1","unverified","C124903911",67,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n66",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:67/2",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Board of Supervisors receives limited information overall describing Agency activities","unverified","C124903911",67,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n66",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:68/1",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Annual report is not being transmitted from the Agency to the Board of Supervisors","unverified","C124903911",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n67",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:68/2",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: No hearings on the annual report have ever been scheduled by the Board of Supervisors","unverified","C124903911",68,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n67",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:69/1",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Agency should provide additional documentation on Agency operations with the annual report transmittal","unverified","C124903911",69,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n68",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:70/1",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency economic development report · recommendation: Annual report on economic development activities should be produced","unverified","C124903911",70,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n69",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:70/3",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Agency does not provide all information required by Community Redevelopment Law to Board of Supervisors","unverified","C124903911",70,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n69",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:71/4",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"Audit recommendations 3.1 to 3.3, San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · cost usd: No cost for implementing these recommendations","unverified","C124903911",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n70",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:73/4",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: conduct biennial evaluations of project performance and improve the annual work program budget","unverified","C124903911",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n72",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:75/6",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency project evaluation · finding: No formal effort to evaluate Agency or staff accomplishment annually or since project inception","unverified","C124903911",75,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n74",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:77/1",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency staff performance evaluation · finding: Agency has no on-going performance evaluation process","unverified","C124903911",77,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n76",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:79/1",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Implement procedures requiring staff to conduct biennial comprehensive evaluations of all Agency projects","unverified","C124903911",79,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n78",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:79/4",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency recommendations · other: Recommendations could be implemented without additional cost","unverified","C124903911",79,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n78",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:82/1",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency economic development program · finding: Agency Commission has not adopted a formal implementation policy for the economic development program","unverified","C124903911",82,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n81",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:82/2",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency economic development program · finding: most funding to date has been outside approved project areas","unverified","C124903911",82,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n81",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:82/6",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Commission · recommendation: adopt a policy requiring future funds to be awarded through review of RFP proposals","unverified","C124903911",82,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n81",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:86/1",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency economic development program · finding: Agency has not met its commitment to allocate five percent of tax increment funds annually to economic development programs","unverified","C124903911",86,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n85",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:86/4",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency tax increment economic development allocation · cost usd: close to $4.5 million in tax increment funds should have been allocated","unverified","C124903911",86,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n85",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:9/3",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency project management · finding: no formal procedures for evaluating actual project accomplishments and costs against stated goals","unverified","C124903911",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n8",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:9/4",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency project management · recommendation: conduct biennial evaluations of project performance","unverified","C124903911",9,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n8",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:90/4",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency economic development program · finding: funds have not been awarded through a competitive evaluation process","unverified","C124903911",90,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n89",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:91/1",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency economic development program · recommendation: Board of Supervisors should not approve additional funds for Agency economic development until the Agency Commission adopts a comprehensive implementation plan","unverified","C124903911",91,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n90",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:93/1",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: 12 percent of agency staff earn over $70,000 annually","unverified","C124903911",93,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n92",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:93/2",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: outside independent classification study of agency salaries","unverified","C124903911",93,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n92",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:93/4",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: 11 executive secretaries, exceeded only by Department of Public Works with 14","unverified","C124903911",93,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n92",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:93/5",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: 108 full time authorized positions, versus 1,868 at Department of Public Works","unverified","C124903911",93,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n92",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:93/7",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: reduce clerical staffing by eight positions","unverified","C124903911",93,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n92",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:94/2",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"Executive Director, San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · cost usd: Executive Director approved salary $119,000 exclusive of fringe benefits","unverified","C124903911",94,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n93",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:94/3",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · jobs: 108 full time authorized positions","unverified","C124903911",94,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n93",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:94/4",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"Executive Secretaries, San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · jobs: 11 Executive [name withheld], exceeded only by Department of Public Works with 14","unverified","C124903911",94,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n93",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","m",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:94/5",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Clerical and secretarial staff percentage approximately 72 percent greater than other similar City departments","unverified","C124903911",94,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n93",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:94/6",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: About 12 percent of Agency staff earn over $70,000 annually, twice the average of seven similar City departments","unverified","C124903911",94,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n93",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:94/7",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: About one-third of Agency positions have no directly comparable City classification","unverified","C124903911",94,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n93",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:97/2",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: 20 divisions, of which 15 are professional","unverified","C124903911",97,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n96",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:97/3",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: a total of 11 executive secretaries, including one confidential secretary to the Executive Director","unverified","C124903911",97,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n96",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:97/4",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: develop a strategic plan to guide Agency operations","unverified","C124903911",97,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n96",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:97/5",1992,1992,"","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency strategic plan · recommendation: detail how the Agency would reduce professional staff over the next three to five years and which functional units would be combined","unverified","C124903911",97,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n96",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:98/1",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Agency has not conducted a workload study to determine whether current secretarial staffing is appropriate","unverified","C124903911",98,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n97",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:98/2",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Clerical and secretarial staff percentage approximately 72 percent greater than average for similar City departments","unverified","C124903911",98,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n97",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:98/3",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Automated voice mail telephone answering system in place for almost a year; Agency has not evaluated its impact on secretarial workload","unverified","C124903911",98,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n97",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:98/4",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: 79 percent of professional staff have a computer terminal at their desk","unverified","C124903911",98,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n97",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:98/5",1992,1992,"","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Agency employs executive secretaries to work in non-executive divisions","unverified","C124903911",98,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n97",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:102/1",1992,1992,"1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency secretarial positions · finding: five Executive Secretary II positions classified above appropriate level","unverified","C124903911",102,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n101",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:102/2",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Executive Secretary II positions · recommendation: reclassify downward the five Executive Secretary II positions to Executive Secretary I or Secretary II","unverified","C124903911",102,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n101",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:102/3",1992,1992,"1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Executive Office · finding: one Executive Office with one Confidential Secretary, one Executive Secretary III and one Executive Secretary II","unverified","C124903911",102,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n101",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:102/4",1992,1992,"1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency staff compensation · finding: share of staff with salaries over $70,000 is twice that of other similar City departments","unverified","C124903911",102,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n101",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:102/5",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency professional staff · recommendation: prepare a plan to reduce professional staff over the next three to five years if no additional projects are assumed","unverified","C124903911",102,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n101",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:11/1",1992,1992,"1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: 12 percent of Agency staff earn over $70,000 annually, twice the average of seven similar City departments","unverified","C124903911",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n10",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:11/2",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Outside independent classification study of the Agency under Board of Supervisors jurisdiction","unverified","C124903911",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n10",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:11/3",1992,1992,"1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: Clerical and secretarial staff share of total staff about 72 percent greater than similar City departments","unverified","C124903911",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n10",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:11/4",1992,1992,"1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: 11 Executive [name withheld], exceeded only by Department of Public Works with 14","unverified","C124903911",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n10",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:11/5",1992,1992,"1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: 108 full time authorized positions, compared with 1,868 for Department of Public Works","unverified","C124903911",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n10",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:11/6",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency clerical staff · cost usd: Reduce clerical staffing by eight positions, saving approximately $350,000 annually","unverified","C124903911",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n10",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:11/7",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Controller recommends the Agency prepare a strategic plan","unverified","C124903911",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n10",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:11/8",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Records Retention Program · recommendation: Re-evaluate the Records Retention Program, not evaluated since formal implementation","unverified","C124903911",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n10",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:118/1",1992,1992,"1992","event","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency management audit · other: Question #13 frequency in which agency reports transactions to legislative body","unverified","C124903911",118,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n117",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:141/1",1992,1992,"1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency budget · finding: Budget Analyst data show no pattern of reallocating funds between projects without Board approval","unverified","C124903911",141,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n140",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:141/2",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency budget · recommendation: Adopt formally the rule that expenditures and revenues not exceed 10% of amounts budgeted; Agency agrees","unverified","C124903911",141,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n140",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:141/3",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency project evaluations · recommendation: Conduct biennial evaluations of projects and prepare summary project status reports; Agency says it already does this","unverified","C124903911",141,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n140",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:141/4",1992,1992,"1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency economic development · finding: Recommendations identified no dollar cost savings; primarily intended to improve coordination","unverified","C124903911",141,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n140",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:142/3",1992,1992,"1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency clerical staff · other: reduction of clerical staff by eight positions (25% from current staffing levels) not supported by agency","unverified","C124903911",142,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n141",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:142/4",1992,1992,"1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency clerical staffing · other: clerical staff 28.9% to 29.6% of total staff in other redevelopment agencies, nearly identical to San Francisco","unverified","C124903911",142,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n141",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:15/2",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Housing Chief to produce an annual report on the tax increment housing program, first accompanying the 1992 annual report","unverified","C124903911",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n14",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:15/3",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Economic Development Chief to produce an annual report on the economic development program, including two years of expenditures, results and coordination with City departments","unverified","C124903911",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n14",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:21/1",1992,1992,"1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Agency makes budgetary changes in violation of State Health and Safety Code Section 33606","unverified","C124903911",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n20",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:21/2",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Agency must request Board of Supervisors approval for any transfer in project area accounts exceeding 10 percent of the annual budget amount","unverified","C124903911",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n20",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:21/3",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Agency must submit quarterly reports detailing revenues and expenditures, as required by the Administrative Code","unverified","C124903911",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n20",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:21/4",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Board of Supervisors approval required for any additional positions created during the fiscal year","unverified","C124903911",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n20",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:27/2",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency senior position classifications · recommendation: independent evaluation of senior position classifications under Board of Supervisors jurisdiction","unverified","C124903911",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n26",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:27/3",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency strategic plan · recommendation: strategic plan evaluating how the Agency would reduce professional staff if no new redevelopment agency projects are authorized","unverified","C124903911",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n26",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:27/6",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency management studies · recommendation: procurement and oversight of studies conducted under Board of Supervisors jurisdiction","unverified","C124903911",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n26",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:71/2",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"Housing Chief, San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Produce an annual report on the tax increment housing program, first accompanying the Agency's annual report commencing in 1992","unverified","C124903911",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n70",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:71/3",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"Economic Development Chief, San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Produce an annual report on the economic development program, first accompanying the Agency's annual report commencing in 1992","unverified","C124903911",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n70",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:73/1",1992,1992,"1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: no formal procedures for evaluating actual project accomplishments and costs against goals and projected costs","unverified","C124903911",73,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n72",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:78/1",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency annual budget · recommendation: Each annual budget should compare previous year's accomplishments against previous year's goals","unverified","C124903911",78,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n77",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:78/2",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency annual budget · recommendation: Annual budget should contain five-year goals for each project area and a table of estimated revenues and costs","unverified","C124903911",78,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n77",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:78/3",1992,1992,"1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Agency does not use any automated programs for project management","unverified","C124903911",78,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n77",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:78/4",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Deputy Executive Director for Finance · recommendation: Perform another evaluation of off-the-shelf and advanced project management software","unverified","C124903911",78,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n77",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:78/5",1992,1992,"1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Implement procedures for evaluating project progress and analyzing projected against actual revenues and expenditures","unverified","C124903911",78,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n77",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:19/1",1992,1992,"1992-01-31","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Reduce Agency clerical staffing levels by eight positions","unverified","C124903911",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n18",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:19/2",1992,1992,"1992-01-31","recommendation","audit",null,"Audit recommendations of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · cost usd: net estimated reduced expenditures to the City of $350,000 annually","unverified","C124903911",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n18",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:23/1",1992,1992,"1992-01-31","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency budget revisions · finding: budgeted amounts approved by the Board of Supervisors increased by more than 10 percent through Agency budget revisions","unverified","C124903911",23,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n22",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:23/2",1992,1992,"1992-01-31","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency project budget revisions · finding: over 25 percent of revisions to project budgets have been upward","unverified","C124903911",23,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n22",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:23/3",1992,1992,"1992-01-31","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency clerical staff · finding: clerical staff reduction of eight positions (a 25% reduction from current staffing levels)","unverified","C124903911",23,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n22",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:23/4",1992,1992,"1992-01-31","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency clerical staff · other: clerical staffing in other redevelopment agencies nearly identical to San Francisco's, 28.9% to 29.6% of total staff","unverified","C124903911",23,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n22",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:7/1",1992,1992,"1992-01-31","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency bond financing · cost usd: $118 million to $139 million depending on the discount rate used","unverified","C124903911",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n6",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:7/2",1992,1992,"1992-01-31","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency tax increment bonds · cost usd: Tax increment monies to repay bonds over 30 years vary from $118 million to $170 million","unverified","C124903911",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n6",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:7/3",1992,1992,"1992-01-31","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: Budget changes during the fiscal year violate State Health and Safety Code Section 33606","unverified","C124903911",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n6",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:7/4",1992,1992,"1992-01-31","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency budget · recommendation: Require the Agency to obtain approval of significant budget revisions","unverified","C124903911",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n6",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:7/5",1992,1992,"1992-01-31","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency annual report · finding: Agency does not submit an annual report to the Board of Supervisors, in violation of Section 33080.1","unverified","C124903911",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n6",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:71/1",1992,1992,"1992-12-31","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Executive Director · recommendation: Submit all information required by Health and Safety Code Section 33080.1 and a statement of Agency revenues and expenditures for fiscal year 1991-92 to the Board of Supervisors prior to December 31, 1992","unverified","C124903911",71,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n70",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:5/4",1992,1992,"30 year period","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency existing projects · cost usd: $524,872,666 total tax increment monies needed to repay bonds in nominal dollars","unverified","C124903911",5,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n4",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:51/2",1992,1992,"30-year period","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency bond and tax increment needs · other: $524,872,666 tax increment monies needed to repay bonds over 30 years (nominal dollars)","unverified","C124903911",51,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n50",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:125/1",1992,1992,"4/11/89","measure","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency housing policy · adopted: Adopted 4/11/89, amended by Resolution No. 100-89 on 5/16/89","unverified","C124903911",125,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n124",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:143/2",1992,1992,"August 1992 through June 1993","finding","audit",null,"Central Records positions (two) · cost usd: projected savings overstated by at least $8,000","unverified","C124903911",143,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n142",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:19/6",1992,1992,"August 1992 through June 1993","recommendation","audit",null,"Central Records positions · recommendation: Place on reserve funds for two Central Records positions","unverified","C124903911",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n18",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:15/1",1992,1992,"December 31, 1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Submit information required by Health and Safety Code Section 33080.1 and FY 1991-92 revenues and expenditures to the Board of Supervisors before December 31, 1992","unverified","C124903911",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n14",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:70/2",1992,1992,"December 31, 1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency housing and economic development reports · recommendation: Provide reports to Board of Supervisors by December 31, 1992","unverified","C124903911",70,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n69",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:70/4",1992,1992,"December 31st","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency fiscal year reporting · recommendation: Present information to Board of Supervisors within six months of fiscal year end (by December 31st)","unverified","C124903911",70,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n69",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:56/1",1992,1992,"FY 1989-90","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: Since FY 1989-90 the Agency has used tax increment monies to repay tax increment-backed bonds","unverified","C124903911",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n55",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:54/1",1992,1992,"FY 1989-90 through 1999-2000","agency","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: Projected and actual cumulative tax increment bond requirements in nominal dollars","unverified","C124903911",54,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n53",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:42/1",1992,1992,"FY 1991-92","agency","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: FY 1991-92 Approved Staffing of 108 Positions","unverified","C124903911",42,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n41",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:44/10002",1992,1992,"FY 1991-92","agency","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: 108 authorized positions","unverified","C124903911",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n43",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:44/2",1992,1992,"FY 1991-92","agency","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · jobs: 108 authorized positions",null,"C124903911",44,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n43",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:96/1",1992,1992,"FY 1991-92","agency","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: authorized staff 182 in 1982 declined to 108 in FY 1991-92","unverified","C124903911",96,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n95",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:63/6",1992,1992,"FY 1991-92 through FY 1993-94","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency budget · finding: Agency budgets have a three-year life; funds may be carried forward three fiscal years","unverified","C124903911",63,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n62",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:101/3",1992,1992,"FY 1992-93","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency clerical staff · recommendation: reduce the number of clerical positions by eight in the FY 1992-93 budget","unverified","C124903911",101,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n100",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:96/4",1992,1992,"FY 1997-98","agency","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency project staffing · other: projected 40 percent decline in years three to five and 75 percent decline in six years","unverified","C124903911",96,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n95",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:1/1",1992,1992,"January 1992","project","audit",null,"Management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: Management audit report to the Board of Supervisors","unverified","C124903911",1,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n0",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:140/1",1992,1992,"January 29, 1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Budget Analyst's seven findings and recommendations","unverified","C124903911",140,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n139",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:140/2",1992,1992,"January 29, 1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Pay-as-you-go funding with tax increment bonds, to be considered by Board and Mayor; Agency agrees it is worthy of consideration","unverified","C124903911",140,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n139",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:140/3",1992,1992,"January 29, 1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Agency to provide additional information to the Board on expenditures, revenues and budgetary data; Agency agrees","unverified","C124903911",140,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n139",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:140/4",1992,1992,"January 29, 1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · rejected: Agency disagrees with Budget Analyst finding that it modified its budget in violation of Redevelopment law or budget resolutions","unverified","C124903911",140,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n139",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:143/10002",1992,1992,"January 29, 1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Agency disagrees that it has made expenditures beyond its approved budget","unverified","C124903911",143,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n142",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:143/3",1992,1992,"January 29, 1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Agency disagrees that it made expenditures beyond its approved budget","unverified","C124903911",143,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n142",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:144/1",1992,1992,"January 29, 1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Agency disagrees that clerical staffing is too high compared to other redevelopment agencies","unverified","C124903911",144,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n143",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:11/9",1992,1992,"January 31, 1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency economic development programs · recommendation: Board of Supervisors should not approve additional funds until Agency Commission adopts a comprehensive implementation plan","unverified","C124903911",11,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n10",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:15/4",1992,1992,"January 31, 1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Implement procedures requiring staff to conduct biennial comprehensive evaluations of all Agency projects","unverified","C124903911",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n14",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:15/5",1992,1992,"January 31, 1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Deputy Executive Director for Finance to standardize the annual work program budget presentation with accomplishments analysis and five year budget projections","unverified","C124903911",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n14",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:15/6",1992,1992,"January 31, 1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Deputy Executive Director for Finance to evaluate automated project management programs and report to the Agency Commission","unverified","C124903911",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n14",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:15/7",1992,1992,"January 31, 1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Commission · recommendation: Discuss and approve an implementation plan for the economic development program","unverified","C124903911",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n14",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:15/8",1992,1992,"January 31, 1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Commission · recommendation: Approve a statement on Agency policy for pursuing and funding economic development projects outside of project areas","unverified","C124903911",15,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n14",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:17/4",1992,1992,"January 31, 1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Retain an independent consultant to conduct a classification study of senior positions pegged to the Executive Director's salary","unverified","C124903911",17,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n16",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:25/1",1992,1992,"January 31, 1992","recommendation","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency clerical staffing · recommendation: reduce clerical staffing levels by eight positions","unverified","C124903911",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n24",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:25/2",1992,1992,"January 31, 1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency clerical staff · finding: clerical and secretarial staff share approximately 72 percent greater than similar City departments","unverified","C124903911",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n24",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:25/3",1992,1992,"January 31, 1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency executive secretaries · finding: 11 Executive [name withheld] in the Agency","unverified","C124903911",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n24",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:25/4",1992,1992,"January 31, 1992","finding","audit",null,"Department of Public Works executive secretaries · finding: 14 Executive [name withheld]","unverified","C124903911",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n24",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,-2.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:25/5",1992,1992,"January 31, 1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency authorized positions · finding: 108 full time authorized positions","unverified","C124903911",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n24",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:25/6",1992,1992,"January 31, 1992","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency professional staff · finding: 79 percent of professional staff have personal computers","unverified","C124903911",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n24",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:143/1",1992,1992,"May 1, 1992","recommendation","audit",null,"Agency Records Retention Program · recommendation: Agency to evaluate its Records Retention Program by May 1, 1992, then issue an RFP for microfilming outside the Agency","unverified","C124903911",143,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n142",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:19/5",1992,1992,"May 1, 1992","recommendation","audit",null,"Records Retention Program · recommendation: Administrative Services Manager to evaluate the Records Retention Program and report to Agency Commission","unverified","C124903911",19,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n18",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101693506:5/1",1992,1992,"October 7, 1991","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency (SFRA) · lead agency: San Francisco Redevelopment Agency (SFRA) solicited the report","unverified","C101693506",5,"https://archive.org/details/C101693506/page/n4",null,null,null,"A management audit of the Center for the Arts at Yerba Buena Gardens","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:39/1",1992,1992,"September through November 1991","agency","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: management audit field work conducted","unverified","C124903911",39,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n38",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:93/8",1992,1992,"annually","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · cost usd: eight position reduction would save approximately $350,000 annually","unverified","C124903911",93,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n92",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:142/2",1992,1992,"four year period","agency","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: $154,000,000 in payroll income from agency construction projects","unverified","C124903911",142,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n141",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:94/1",1992,1992,"last nine years","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Agency staffing levels decreased 40 percent over the last nine years","unverified","C124903911",94,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n93",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:100/1",1992,1992,"since 1986","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: Percentage of clerical staff has increased every year since 1986","unverified","C124903911",100,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n99",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:93/3",1992,1992,"since 1986","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: clerical staff share of total staff increased every year since 1986","unverified","C124903911",93,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n92",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:52/3",1992,1992,"through the year 2000","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency tax increment bonds · other: approximately 30 percent of total tax increment revenues accruing to the City","unverified","C124903911",52,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n51",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:93/6",1992,1992,"through the year 2000","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: sharp decline in need for professional staff projected","unverified","C124903911",93,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n92",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:90/3",1992,1992,"two years ago, since inception","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency economic development program · finding: Agency Commission has yet to adopt an implementation plan for the program","unverified","C124903911",90,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n89",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:50/6",1992,1993,"through FY 1993-94","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: approximately $9,597,441 annually in tax increment revenues to repay bonds","unverified","C124903911",50,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n49",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914324:25/4",1994,1994,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · event: will play an integral role in implementing the recommendations","unverified","C124914324",25,"https://archive.org/details/C124914324/page/n24",null,null,null,"A second decade response to HIV/AIDS in San Francisco","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916951:21/2",1994,1994,"","agency","other",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: Place to inquire: 770 Golden Gate Avenue","unverified","C124916951",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124916951/page/n20","770 Golden Gate Avenue",null,null,"Getting business started : entrepreneur's guide to doing business in San Francisco","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916951:26/4",1994,1994,"","agency","other",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency (SFRA) · other: 770 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102","unverified","C124916951",26,"https://archive.org/details/C124916951/page/n25","770 Golden Gate Avenue",null,null,"Getting business started : entrepreneur's guide to doing business in San Francisco","n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofseptdecproceed89sanfrich:75/1",1994,1994,"1994-09-26","appointment",null,"passed","Benny Yee was appointed to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for a term ending September 3, 1998.","quoted","journalofseptdecproceed89sanfrich",75,"https://archive.org/details/journalofseptdecproceed89sanfrich/page/n74",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,5.3],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124916951:21/4",1994,1994,"June 1993","event","other",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · event: Added responsibility for City wide economic development to its mission","unverified","C124916951",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124916951/page/n20",null,null,null,"Getting business started : entrepreneur's guide to doing business in San Francisco","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124918144:6/10",1996,1996,"","action","study or report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency tax increment financing for ballpark · cost usd: $10 million Tax Increment Bonds debt financing","unverified","C124918144",6,"https://archive.org/details/C124918144/page/n5",null,null,null,"Review of the projected costs and economic benefits associated with the San Francisco Giants' proposed ballpark at China Basin","n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofseptdecproceed91sanfrich:28/3",1996,1996,"1996-09-03","appointment",null,"passed","Board confirmed Mayor's appointment of James Morales as a member of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency.","quoted","journalofseptdecproceed91sanfrich",28,"https://archive.org/details/journalofseptdecproceed91sanfrich/page/n23",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,5.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofseptdecproceed91sanfrich:29/1",1996,1996,"1996-09-03","appointment",null,"passed","Mayor's appointment of James Morales to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency was confirmed.","quoted","journalofseptdecproceed91sanfrich",29,"https://archive.org/details/journalofseptdecproceed91sanfrich/page/n24",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,5.38],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919102:3/2",1996,1996,"July 1996","agency","plan",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: using the South Bayshore Plan as the basis for its programs in Bayview Hunters Point","unverified","C124919102",3,"https://archive.org/details/C124919102/page/n2",null,null,null,"South Bayshore : a new beginning : citizen's guide to the South Bayshore plan","n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceedjanapr92sanfrich:329/4",1997,1997,"1997-04-28","appointment",null,"passed","Board adopted a resolution confirming Mayor's appointment of Mark Dunlop to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency.","quoted","journalofproceedjanapr92sanfrich",329,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceedjanapr92sanfrich/page/n329",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,5.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich:152/6",1997,1997,"1997-06-16","resolution","health","referred","Resolution urging the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency to act on lead poisoning prevention recommendations was referred to the Board.","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich",152,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich/page/n151",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich:172/3",1997,1997,"1997-06-23","resolution","health","passed","Resolution urges the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency to carry out health department lead poisoning recommendations.","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich",172,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich/page/n171",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.89],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjulydecproceed93sanfrich:300/4",1998,1998,null,"appointment",null,"passed","Benny Yee and Leroy King were reappointed to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency.","quoted","journalofjulydecproceed93sanfrich",300,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjulydecproceed93sanfrich/page/n299",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,5.25],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124910717:67/5",1998,1998,"","agency","environmental impact report",null,"San Francisco Planning Commission, San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Commission, Board of Supervisors · other: local decision makers expected to use this EIS/EIR in making decisions regarding amendments to the Redevelopment Plan","unverified","C124910717",67,"https://archive.org/details/C124910717/page/n66",null,null,null,"Revised draft environmental impact statement/environmental impact report for the disposal and reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124910762:12/1",1998,1998,"","agency","study or report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · adopted: contracting rules almost identical to those contained in the Ordinance","unverified","C124910762",12,"https://archive.org/details/C124910762/page/n11",null,null,null,"The Equal benefits ordinance : a six month report","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915258:150/5",1998,1998,"","agency","environmental impact report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: Project review required for portions within existing Redevelopment Project Areas","unverified","C124915258",150,"https://archive.org/details/C124915258/page/n149",null,null,null,"Draft environmental impact statement/draft environmental impact report for the Third Street light rail project in the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed93sanfrich:181/7",1998,1998,"1998-03-16","appointment",null,"passed","Ramon Enrique Romero's appointment to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency was confirmed by the Board.","quoted","journalofproceed93sanfrich",181,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed93sanfrich/page/n180",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich:206/2",1999,1999,null,"resolution","health","passed","Resolution urges the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency to carry out lead poisoning prevention recommendations from the Department of Public Health.","quoted","journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich",206,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich/page/n205",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.89],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922522:145/3",2000,2000,"","agency","environmental impact report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: agreed to implement the TMA and TSMP","unverified","C124922522",145,"https://archive.org/details/C124922522/page/n144",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact statement for the disposal and reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922522:255/2",2000,2000,"","agency","environmental impact report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: development agreement with a primary developer selected by the Redevelopment Agency Commission","unverified","C124922522",255,"https://archive.org/details/C124922522/page/n254",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact statement for the disposal and reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922522:304/3",2000,2000,"","agency","environmental impact report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: Development agreement with a primary developer selected by the Redevelopment Agency Commission","unverified","C124922522",304,"https://archive.org/details/C124922522/page/n303",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact statement for the disposal and reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922522:378/2",2000,2000,"","agency","environmental impact report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: First Source Hiring program","unverified","C124922522",378,"https://archive.org/details/C124922522/page/n377",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact statement for the disposal and reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922531:359/1",2000,2000,"","agency","environmental impact report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, Office of Military Base Conversion · other: Office of Military Base Conversion; project manager for Hunters Point Shipyard","unverified","C124922531",359,"https://archive.org/details/C124922531/page/n358","770 Golden Gate Avenue",null,null,"Final environmental impact statement for the disposal and reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:27/4",1992,2000,"2000","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · finding: sharp decline in the need for professional staff projected by the year 2000","unverified","C124903911",27,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n26",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922522:241/3",2000,2000,"2000","recommendation","environmental impact report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: Committed to measures to reduce TAC emissions from stationary sources to the extent feasible","unverified","C124922522",241,"https://archive.org/details/C124922522/page/n240",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact statement for the disposal and reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922522:35/5",2000,2000,"2000","agency","environmental impact report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Evaluate and permit all potential stationary sources of TACs at HPS as one facility","unverified","C124922522",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124922522/page/n34",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact statement for the disposal and reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922522:358/4",2000,2000,"2000","finding","environmental impact report",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: not able to make commitments at this stage regarding community ownership of HPS property","unverified","C124922522",358,"https://archive.org/details/C124922522/page/n357",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact statement for the disposal and reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard","n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesmayaug95sanfrich:62/5",2000,2000,"2000-05-08","appointment","redevelopment","referred","Resolution confirming Mayor's appointment of Kathryn C. Palamountain to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency was sent to Rules Committee.","quoted","meetingminutesmayaug95sanfrich",62,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesmayaug95sanfrich/page/n61",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2000sanf_0:209/3",2000,2000,"2000-06-05","appointment",null,"passed","Board confirmed Mayor's appointment of Kathryn C. Palamountain to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency.","quoted","meetingminutesb2000sanf_0",209,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2000sanf_0/page/n208",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingseptdecminutes95sanfrich:63/5",2000,2000,"2000-09-25","resolution","redevelopment","referred","Resolution urges the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency to prioritize development of non-profit office space; referred for adoption.","quoted","meetingseptdecminutes95sanfrich",63,"https://archive.org/details/meetingseptdecminutes95sanfrich/page/n60",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2000sanf_1:93/3",2000,2000,"2000-10-02","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Resolution adopted urging the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency to prioritize development of non-profit office space.","quoted","meetingminutesb2000sanf_1",93,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2000sanf_1/page/n92",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,7.16],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2000sanf_1:222/3",2000,2000,"2000-11-06","appointment",null,"passed","Mark Dunlop reappointed to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for a four-year term.","quoted","meetingminutesb2000sanf_1",222,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2000sanf_1/page/n221",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,5.38],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:49/3",1992,2000,"through 2000","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · cost usd: $217,195,551 total estimated bond requirements through 2000 in nominal dollars","unverified","C124903911",49,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n48",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:5/3",1992,2000,"through 2000","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency existing projects · cost usd: $217,195,551 total estimated bond requirements in nominal dollars","unverified","C124903911",5,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n4",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:51/1",1992,2000,"through 2000","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency bond and tax increment needs · other: $217,105,551 total estimated bond needs through 2000 (nominal dollars)","unverified","C124903911",51,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n50",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:51/5",1992,2000,"through 2000","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency bond and tax increment needs · other: difference between bond requirements and tax increment payments varies from $0 to $30,599,209","unverified","C124903911",51,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n50",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:56/4",1992,2000,"through 2000","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency existing projects · cost usd: $217,105,551 total estimated bond requirements through 2000, nominal dollars","unverified","C124903911",56,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n55",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:52/1",1992,2000,"through the year 2000","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency tax increment revenues · other: approximately $448.3 million","unverified","C124903911",52,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n51",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:52/2",1992,2000,"through the year 2000","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency tax increment payments · cost usd: approximately $134.8 million","unverified","C124903911",52,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n51",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:52/5",1992,2000,"through the year 2000","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency bond financing versus pay-as-you-go · cost usd: minimum cost to the total City of approximately $952,164, five percent discount rate, present value 1991-92 dollars","unverified","C124903911",52,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n51",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903911:52/6",1992,2000,"through the year 2000","finding","audit",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency bond financing versus pay-as-you-go · cost usd: maximum cost of $1,128,398 in present value 1991-92 dollars, at the bond interest rate","unverified","C124903911",52,"https://archive.org/details/C124903911/page/n51",null,null,null,"Report to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors : management audit of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2001sanf_1:358/4",2001,2001,"2001-12-17","appointment",null,"passed","Chantel L. Walker was confirmed as appointee to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, replacing [name withheld].","quoted","meetingminutesb2001sanf_1",358,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2001sanf_1/page/n357",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,5.38],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101694856:134/1",2002,2002,"","measure","plan",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: Allocate at least 50% of increment funds for low and moderate income housing","unverified","C101694856",134,"https://archive.org/details/C101694856/page/n133",null,null,null,"Housing element : an element of the San Francisco general plan : draft for public review","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101694856:150/1",2002,2002,"","recommendation","plan",null,"City agencies (Mayor's Office of Housing, Department of Human Services, Department of Public Health, San Francisco Redevelopment Agency) · recommendation: prioritize the development of permanent supportive housing","unverified","C101694856",150,"https://archive.org/details/C101694856/page/n149",null,null,null,"Housing element : an element of the San Francisco general plan : draft for public review","n","m",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesjanmay97sanfrich:522/2",2002,2002,"2002-05-28","appointment","redevelopment","passed","Ramon Romero reappointed to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for the remainder of a four-year term.","quoted","meetingminutesjanmay97sanfrich",522,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesjanmay97sanfrich/page/n521",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.91],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2002sanf_0:423/1",2002,2002,"2002-08-26","appointment",null,"passed","Michelle Sexton was confirmed as a San Francisco Redevelopment Agency member for the rest of a term ending in 2003.","quoted","meetingminutesb2002sanf_0",423,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2002sanf_0/page/n422",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2003sanf_2:217/4",2003,2003,null,"appointment",null,"passed","Dar Singh was re-appointed by the Mayor to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for a four-year term ending September 2007.","quoted","meetingminutesb2003sanf_2",217,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2003sanf_2/page/n216",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,5.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2003sanf_2:219/1",2003,2003,null,"appointment",null,"passed","Michelle Sexton reappointed to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for a four-year term ending September 2007.","quoted","meetingminutesb2003sanf_2",219,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2003sanf_2/page/n218",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.38],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925579:165/3",2003,2003,"","agency","plan",null,"Mayor's Office of Housing and San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: will continue to establish goals for programs and individual projects serving a variety of income levels","unverified","C124925579",165,"https://archive.org/details/C124925579/page/n164",null,null,null,"Housing element : an element of the San Francisco general plan : final draft for public review","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925579:175/3",2003,2003,"","action","plan",null,"Mayor's Office of Housing and San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Provide tenants displaced during rehabilitation with right to return to the unit or a comparable unit","unverified","C124925579",175,"https://archive.org/details/C124925579/page/n174",null,null,null,"Housing element : an element of the San Francisco general plan : final draft for public review","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925579:193/1",2003,2003,"","agency","plan",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency (SFRA) · lead agency: lead agency and administrator of the HOPWA Program","unverified","C124925579",193,"https://archive.org/details/C124925579/page/n192",null,null,null,"Housing element : an element of the San Francisco general plan : final draft for public review","n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925579:155/2",2003,2003,"2003","agency","plan",null,"Mayor's Office of Housing and San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Continue to fund and provide technical support to non-profit housing corporations (Implementation 5.2)","unverified","C124925579",155,"https://archive.org/details/C124925579/page/n154",null,null,null,"Housing element : an element of the San Francisco general plan : final draft for public review","n","m",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesjanmar98sanfrich:26/2",2003,2003,"2003-01-21","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Board urged the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Commission to move its regular meetings from Tuesday to Monday.","quoted","meetingminutesjanmar98sanfrich",26,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesjanmar98sanfrich/page/n25",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.84],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesjanmar98sanfrich:249/1",2003,2003,"2003-02-18","resolution",null,"passed","Resolution commends [name withheld] on her retirement from the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency.","quoted","meetingminutesjanmar98sanfrich",249,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesjanmar98sanfrich/page/n244",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.75],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesjanmar98sanfrich:461/2",2003,2003,"2003-03-25","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Benny Yee re-appointed to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for a term ending September 2006, adopted by a 6-5 vote.","quoted","meetingminutesjanmar98sanfrich",461,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesjanmar98sanfrich/page/n452",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,8.04],["d","qipu:sf/decision/1minutes2003sanf:369/1",2003,2003,"2003-10-01","appointment",null,"pending","Rules Committee recommended re-appointing [name withheld] to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for a term ending 2007.","quoted","1minutes2003sanf",369,"https://archive.org/details/1minutes2003sanf/page/n368",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingseptdec2003minutes9831sanfrich:217/4",2003,2003,"2003-10-07","appointment",null,"passed","Dar Singh was re-appointed to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for a four-year term, proposed by the Mayor.","quoted","meetingseptdec2003minutes9831sanfrich",217,"https://archive.org/details/meetingseptdec2003minutes9831sanfrich/page/n212",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,5.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingseptdec2003minutes9831sanfrich:218/1",2003,2003,"2003-10-07","appointment","redevelopment","passed","Michelle Sexton was reappointed to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for a four-year term ending September 3, 2007.","quoted","meetingseptdec2003minutes9831sanfrich",218,"https://archive.org/details/meetingseptdec2003minutes9831sanfrich/page/n213",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.91],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101746510:180/2",2004,2004,"2004","agency","plan",null,"Mayor's Office of Housing and San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · recommendation: Continue to fund and provide technical support to non-profit housing corporations","unverified","C101746510",180,"https://archive.org/details/C101746510/page/n179",null,null,null,"Housing element : an element of the San Francisco general plan","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101746510:187/1",2004,2004,"2004","agency","plan",null,"San Francisco Redevelopment Agency · other: will continue to promote permanent affordable housing by approving construction of housing in designated redevelopment areas","unverified","C101746510",187,"https://archive.org/details/C101746510/page/n186",null,null,null,"Housing element : an element of the San Francisco general plan","n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2005sanf_2:220/4",2005,2005,null,"appointment","redevelopment","referred","Proposed reappointment of Ramon Romero to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, sent to Rules Committee.","unverified","meetingminutesb2005sanf_2",220,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2005sanf_2/page/n219",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2005sanf_2:315/3",2005,2005,null,"appointment","redevelopment","passed","Ramon Romero reappointed to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, adopted as Resolution 822-05.","unverified","meetingminutesb2005sanf_2",315,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2005sanf_2/page/n314",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.91],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingseptdec2005minutes100sanfrich:323/3",2005,2005,null,"resolution",null,"passed","Ramon Romero reappointed to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency; resolution adopted by the Board.","quoted","meetingseptdec2005minutes100sanfrich",323,"https://archive.org/details/meetingseptdec2005minutes100sanfrich/page/n314",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2006sanf_3:221/2",2006,2006,null,"appointment",null,"passed","The Mayor's reappointment of Leroy King to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency was confirmed.","quoted","meetingminutesb2006sanf_3",221,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2006sanf_3/page/n220",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich:219/2",2006,2006,null,"appointment",null,"passed","Leroy King was reappointed by the Mayor to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, confirmed by the Board.","quoted","meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich",219,"https://archive.org/details/meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich/page/n218",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.3],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesd2006sanf_0:275/1",2006,2006,"2006-11-07","appointment",null,"passed","Leroy King's reappointment by the Mayor to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency was confirmed by the Board.","quoted","meetingminutesd2006sanf_0",275,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesd2006sanf_0/page/n274",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesd2006sanf_0:349/3",2006,2006,"2006-12-05","appointment",null,"refused","The Board did not adopt the reappointment of Benny Yee to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency.","quoted","meetingminutesd2006sanf_0",349,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesd2006sanf_0/page/n348",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,8.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich:307/1",2006,2006,"2006-12-05","appointment","redevelopment","refused","The Board refused to confirm Benny Yee's reappointment to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency after a failed motion to continue.","quoted","meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich",307,"https://archive.org/details/meetingseptdec2006minutes101sanfrich/page/n306",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,9.16],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjanmar2007minutes102sanfrich:246/1",2007,2007,null,"appointment",null,"passed","Linda Cheu confirmed as a San Francisco Redevelopment Agency member, term ending September 3, 2010.","quoted","meetingjanmar2007minutes102sanfrich",246,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjanmar2007minutes102sanfrich/page/n241",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2007sanf_2:198/1",2007,2007,null,"appointment",null,"referred","Resolution confirming Mayor's appointment of Richard Swig to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency was sent to Rules Committee.","quoted","meetingminutesb2007sanf_2",198,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2007sanf_2/page/n197",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2007sanf_2:243/2",2007,2007,null,"appointment",null,"passed","The Board confirmed Mayor's appointment of Richard Swig to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency.","quoted","meetingminutesb2007sanf_2",243,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2007sanf_2/page/n242",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,7.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2007sanf_2:244/2",2007,2007,null,"appointment",null,"passed","Board confirmed Mayor's appointment of Richard Swig to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency by a 10-1 vote.","quoted","meetingminutesb2007sanf_2",244,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2007sanf_2/page/n243",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,7.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutes102sanfrich:198/2",2007,2007,"2007-10-23","appointment",null,"referred","Mayor's appointment of Richard Swig to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency sent to Rules Committee.","unverified","meetingminutes102sanfrich",198,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutes102sanfrich/page/n197",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/1minutes2007sanf:212/3",2007,2007,"2007-11-01","resolution","redevelopment","referred","Mayor's appointment of Richard Swig to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency proposed for confirmation, referred to Rules Committee.","quoted","1minutes2007sanf",212,"https://archive.org/details/1minutes2007sanf/page/n211",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2008sanf:506/2",2008,2008,null,"appointment","redevelopment","passed","Board confirmed the re-appointment of London Breed to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for a four-year term.","quoted","meetingminutesbo2008sanf",506,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2008sanf/page/n505",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.91],["d","qipu:sf/decision/minutes2008sanf:411/2",2008,2008,null,"appointment",null,null,"Rules Committee recommended re-appointing [name withheld] to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for a term ending 2012.","quoted","minutes2008sanf",411,"https://archive.org/details/minutes2008sanf/page/n410",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/minutes2008sanf:71/3",2008,2008,null,"appointment","redevelopment",null,"Rules Committee recommended confirming London Breed's re-appointment to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency.","quoted","minutes2008sanf",71,"https://archive.org/details/minutes2008sanf/page/n70",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/minutes2008sanf:71/4",2008,2008,null,"appointment","redevelopment",null,"Rules Committee recommended confirming Darshan Singh's re-appointment to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency.","quoted","minutes2008sanf",71,"https://archive.org/details/minutes2008sanf/page/n70",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesdr2008sanf:209/1",2008,2008,"2008-03-18","appointment","redevelopment","passed","London Breed was re-appointed to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for a four-year term ending September 3, 2011.","quoted","meetingminutesdr2008sanf",209,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesdr2008sanf/page/n208",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,7.04],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesdr2008sanf:209/2",2008,2008,"2008-03-18","appointment","redevelopment","passed","Darshan Singh was re-appointed to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for a four-year term ending September 3, 2011.","quoted","meetingminutesdr2008sanf",209,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesdr2008sanf/page/n208",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.04],["d","qipu:sf/decision/minutes2008sanf:373/1",2008,2008,"2008-10-23","appointment","redevelopment",null,"Rules Committee recommended confirming Francee Covington's re-appointment to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency.","quoted","minutes2008sanf",373,"https://archive.org/details/minutes2008sanf/page/n372",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2008sanf_2:380/1",2008,2008,"2008-11-04","appointment","redevelopment","passed","Francee Covington was re-appointed to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for a four-year term, approved by the Board.","quoted","meetingminutesb2008sanf_2",380,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2008sanf_2/page/n379",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.91],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2008sanf_2|142",2008,2008,"2008-11-04","motion","the-street","passed","Francee Covington reappointed to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency","unverified","meetingminutesb2008sanf_2",380,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2008sanf_2/page/n379",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesd2008sanf_0:378/3",2008,2008,"2008-11-25","appointment",null,"passed","Rick Swig was re-appointed to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for a four-year term, confirmed by the Board.","quoted","meetingminutesd2008sanf_0",378,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesd2008sanf_0/page/n377",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2009sanf:614/3",2009,2009,null,"appointment",null,"passed","Supervisors approved Mayor's appointment of Miguel Bustos to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for a four-year term.","unverified","meetingminutesbo2009sanf",614,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2009sanf/page/n613",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.3],["d","qipu:sf/decision/minutes2009sanf:374/3",2009,2009,"2009-11-19","motion",null,null,"Mayor proposes confirming [name withheld] to a four-year term on the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency.","quoted","minutes2009sanf",374,"https://archive.org/details/minutes2009sanf/page/n373",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/minutes2009sanf:382/2",2009,2009,"2009-11-19","appointment","redevelopment",null,"Rules Committee recommends confirming [name withheld] to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for a four-year term.","quoted","minutes2009sanf",382,"https://archive.org/details/minutes2009sanf/page/n381",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922531:338/3",2000,2015,"2015","finding","environmental impact report",null,"HPS area projected population, San Francisco Redevelopment Agency '97 (2015) · population: 40,735","unverified","C124922531",338,"https://archive.org/details/C124922531/page/n337",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact statement for the disposal and reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard","n","m",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922531:338/6",2000,2015,"2015","finding","environmental impact report",null,"HPS area projected employment, San Francisco Redevelopment Agency '97 (2015) · jobs: 49,805","unverified","C124922531",338,"https://archive.org/details/C124922531/page/n337",null,null,null,"Final environmental impact statement for the disposal and reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard","n","m",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071216|44",2016,2016,"2016-07-12","resolution","land-and-building",null,"$185,000,000 (≈ $259.7 million in 2026 dollars) in bonds proposed in the redevelopment successor's budget","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071216_minutes.pdf#page=9",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071216|45",2016,2016,"2016-07-12","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Redevelopment successor budget and $185,000,000 (≈ $259.7 million in 2026 dollars) in bonds put off","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071216_minutes.pdf#page=9",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071916|21",2016,2016,"2016-07-19","resolution","land-and-building",null,"$185,000,000 (≈ $259.7 million in 2026 dollars) in bonds proposed in the redevelopment successor's budget","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071916_minutes.pdf#page=6",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071916|22",2016,2016,"2016-07-19","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Up to $185 million (≈ $259.7 million in 2026 dollars) in bonds for old redevelopment debts approved","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071916_minutes.pdf#page=6",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,5.64],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag072616|126",2016,2016,"2016-07-26","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Downtown block sold to [name withheld] for affordable for-sale housing","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag072616_minutes.pdf#page=33",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag072616|127",2016,2016,"2016-07-26","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Transbay Block One development deal approved with developer","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag072616_minutes.pdf#page=33",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,1.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag060617|129",2017,2017,"2017-06-06","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Redevelopment successor agency interim budget sent to committee","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag060617_minutes.pdf#page=28",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag060617|130",2017,2017,"2017-06-06","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Redevelopment successor agency budget sent to committee","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag060617_minutes.pdf#page=28",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag061317|67",2017,2017,"2017-06-13","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Redevelopment successor agency interim budget put forward","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag061317_minutes.pdf#page=15",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag061317|68",2017,2017,"2017-06-13","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Winding-down agency's interim budget for 2017-18 approved","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag061317_minutes.pdf#page=15",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,1.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071117|67",2017,2017,"2017-07-11","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure budget taken up","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071117_minutes.pdf#page=12",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071117|68",2017,2017,"2017-07-11","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure budget continued to July 18","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071117_minutes.pdf#page=12",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071817|16",2017,2017,"2017-07-18","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Successor agency to the Redevelopment Agency's 2017-2018 budget proposed","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071817_minutes.pdf#page=5",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071817|17",2017,2017,"2017-07-18","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Budget for the agency winding down old redevelopment projects approved","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071817_minutes.pdf#page=5",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,5.72],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag060518|115",2018,2018,"2018-06-05","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Successor redevelopment agency interim budget sent to committee","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag060518_minutes.pdf#page=22",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag060518|116",2018,2018,"2018-06-05","resolution","land-and-building",null,"$143,374,815 (≈ $192.4 million in 2026 dollars) bond issue and the OCII budget sent to committee","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag060518_minutes.pdf#page=22",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag061918|11",2018,2018,"2018-06-19","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Successor redevelopment agency interim budget put forward","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag061918_minutes.pdf#page=4",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag061918|12",2018,2018,"2018-06-19","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Budget for closing out old redevelopment agency approved","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag061918_minutes.pdf#page=4",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,6.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag061918|57",2018,2018,"2018-06-19","motion","running-the-city",null,"[name withheld] nominated again to the Successor Agency Oversight Board","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag061918_minutes.pdf#page=13",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag061918|58",2018,2018,"2018-06-19","motion","running-the-city","passed","John Rahaim reappointed to Successor Agency oversight board","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag061918_minutes.pdf#page=13",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,0.87],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071718|31",2018,2018,"2018-07-17","resolution","land-and-building",null,"$143,374,815 (≈ $192.4 million in 2026 dollars) bond issue and the OCII budget put forward","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071718_minutes.pdf#page=8",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071718|32",2018,2018,"2018-07-17","resolution","land-and-building",null,"OCII budget and bond issue put off to July 24","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071718_minutes.pdf#page=8",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag072418|41",2018,2018,"2018-07-24","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Office of Community Investment budget and $143,374,815 (≈ $192.4 million in 2026 dollars) in bonds proposed","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag072418_minutes.pdf#page=11",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag072418|42",2018,2018,"2018-07-24","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Old redevelopment agency budget and up to $143 million (≈ $191.9 million in 2026 dollars) bonds approved","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag072418_minutes.pdf#page=11",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,6.39],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag060419|155",2019,2019,"2019-06-04","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Interim budget for the city's redevelopment successor agency referred","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag060419_minutes.pdf#page=23",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag060419|156",2019,2019,"2019-06-04","resolution","land-and-building",null,"$40,714,400 (≈ $53.7 million in 2026 dollars) in bonds for the redevelopment successor agency referred","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag060419_minutes.pdf#page=24",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag061819|18",2019,2019,"2019-06-18","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Interim budget for the redevelopment successor agency put forward","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag061819_minutes.pdf#page=6",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag061819|19",2019,2019,"2019-06-18","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Interim budget for the former redevelopment agency adopted","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag061819_minutes.pdf#page=6",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,6.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071619|44",2019,2019,"2019-07-16","resolution","land-and-building",null,"$40.7M (≈ $53.6 million in 2026 dollars) bond issue proposed with the redevelopment successor agency budget","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071619_minutes.pdf#page=9",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071619|45",2019,2019,"2019-07-16","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Redevelopment successor agency budget and bonds continued to July 23","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071619_minutes.pdf#page=9",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,0.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag072319|22",2019,2019,"2019-07-23","resolution","land-and-building",null,"$40.7M (≈ $53.6 million in 2026 dollars) bond issue proposed with the redevelopment successor agency budget","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag072319_minutes.pdf#page=6",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag072319|23",2019,2019,"2019-07-23","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Former redevelopment agency's $40.7M (≈ $53.6 million in 2026 dollars) bond plan approved","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag072319_minutes.pdf#page=6",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,6.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag062320|44",2020,2020,"2020-06-23","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Interim budget proposed for the city's redevelopment successor agency","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag062320_minutes.pdf#page=10",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag062320|45",2020,2020,"2020-06-23","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Budget for winding down old redevelopment agency approved","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag062320_minutes.pdf#page=10",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,6.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag091520|33",2020,2020,"2020-09-15","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Redevelopment successor budget and $15,473,823 (≈ $20.1 million in 2026 dollars) bond issue put forward","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag091520_minutes.pdf#page=10",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag091520|34",2020,2020,"2020-09-15","resolution","running-the-city",null,"Redevelopment successor budget and bond issue continued to September 22","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag091520_minutes.pdf#page=10",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,0.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag092220|66",2020,2020,"2020-09-22","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Redevelopment successor budget and $15,473,823 (≈ $20.1 million in 2026 dollars) bond issue put forward","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag092220_minutes.pdf#page=12",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag092220|67",2020,2020,"2020-09-22","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Redevelopment successor budget and $15.5 million (≈ $20.2 million in 2026 dollars) bonds approved","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag092220_minutes.pdf#page=12",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,5.47],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag062221|27",2021,2021,"2021-06-22","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Interim budget proposed for the city's redevelopment successor agency","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag062221_minutes.pdf#page=7",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag062221|28",2021,2021,"2021-06-22","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Budget for winding down old redevelopment agency approved","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag062221_minutes.pdf#page=7",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,6.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071321|21",2021,2021,"2021-07-13","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Haney moves on the redevelopment agency budget and $130,412,893 (≈ $162.2 million in 2026 dollars) bonds","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071321_minutes.pdf#page=6",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071321|22",2021,2021,"2021-07-13","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Redevelopment agency budget and $130,412,893 (≈ $162.2 million in 2026 dollars) bonds put off to July 20","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071321_minutes.pdf#page=6",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag072021|22",2021,2021,"2021-07-20","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Redevelopment successor agency budget and $130,412,893 (≈ $162.2 million in 2026 dollars) bonds proposed","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag072021_minutes.pdf#page=9",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag072021|23",2021,2021,"2021-07-20","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Redevelopment agency budget and $130 million (≈ $161.6 million in 2026 dollars) bonds approved","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag072021_minutes.pdf#page=9",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,6.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag060722|173",2022,2022,"2022-06-07","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Interim budget for the redevelopment successor agency sent to committee","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag060722_minutes.pdf#page=40",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag060722|174",2022,2022,"2022-06-07","resolution","land-and-building",null,"$99.7M (≈ $114.8 million in 2026 dollars) bond issue for the redevelopment successor agency sent to committee","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag060722_minutes.pdf#page=40",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag062822|29",2022,2022,"2022-06-28","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Interim budget for the redevelopment successor agency before the Board","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag062822_minutes.pdf#page=8",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag062822|30",2022,2022,"2022-06-28","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Interim budget for redevelopment successor agency approved","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag062822_minutes.pdf#page=8",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,5.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071222|31",2022,2022,"2022-07-12","resolution","land-and-building",null,"$99.7M (≈ $114.8 million in 2026 dollars) bond issue for the redevelopment successor agency before the Board","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071222_minutes.pdf#page=9",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071222|32",2022,2022,"2022-07-12","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Redevelopment successor agency budget and bonds continued to July 19","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071222_minutes.pdf#page=9",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,0.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071922|130",2022,2022,"2022-07-19","resolution","land-and-building",null,"F4 Transbay Partners' purchase of 200 Main Street sent to committee","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071922_minutes.pdf#page=37",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071922|14",2022,2022,"2022-07-19","resolution","land-and-building",null,"$99.7M (≈ $114.8 million in 2026 dollars) bond issue for the redevelopment successor agency before the Board","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071922_minutes.pdf#page=5",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071922|15",2022,2022,"2022-07-19","resolution","running-the-city","passed","$99.7M (≈ $114.8 million in 2026 dollars) bond plan for old redevelopment debts approved","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071922_minutes.pdf#page=5",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,5.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag060623|145",2023,2023,"2023-06-06","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Redevelopment successor agency interim budget sent to committee","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag060623_minutes.pdf#page=42",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag060623|146",2023,2023,"2023-06-06","resolution","land-and-building",null,"$75,000,000 (≈ $82.9 million in 2026 dollars) in redevelopment successor agency bonds sent to committee","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag060623_minutes.pdf#page=42",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag062723|54",2023,2023,"2023-06-27","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Interim budget proposed for the former Redevelopment Agency's successor","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag062723_minutes.pdf#page=12",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag062723|55",2023,2023,"2023-06-27","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Interim budget for old redevelopment agency's successor approved","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag062723_minutes.pdf#page=12",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,6.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071123|66",2023,2023,"2023-07-11","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Redevelopment successor agency's budget and $75,000,000 (≈ $82.9 million in 2026 dollars) bonds proposed","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071123_minutes.pdf#page=14",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071123|67",2023,2023,"2023-07-11","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Redevelopment successor agency budget put off to July 18","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071123_minutes.pdf#page=14",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071823|36",2023,2023,"2023-07-18","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Redevelopment successor agency's budget and $75,000,000 (≈ $82.9 million in 2026 dollars) bonds proposed","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071823_minutes.pdf#page=13",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071823|37",2023,2023,"2023-07-18","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Up to $75 million (≈ $82.9 million in 2026 dollars) in bonds for old redevelopment debts approved","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071823_minutes.pdf#page=13",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,5.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag060424|139",2024,2024,"2024-06-04","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Interim redevelopment successor agency budget sent to committee","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag060424_minutes.pdf#page=30",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag060424|140",2024,2024,"2024-06-04","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Redevelopment successor agency budget for 2024-2025 sent to committee","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag060424_minutes.pdf#page=31",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag061824|69",2024,2024,"2024-06-18","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Interim budget for the city's redevelopment successor agency proposed","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag061824_minutes.pdf#page=12",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag061824|70",2024,2024,"2024-06-18","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Interim budget for winding-down redevelopment agency approved","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag061824_minutes.pdf#page=12",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,6.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag070924|51",2024,2024,"2024-07-09","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Budget of the redevelopment successor agency put forward","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag070924_minutes.pdf#page=13",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag070924|52",2024,2024,"2024-07-09","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Redevelopment successor agency budget put off to July 16","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag070924_minutes.pdf#page=13",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071624|20",2024,2024,"2024-07-16","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Budget of the redevelopment successor agency put forward","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071624_minutes.pdf#page=7",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071624|21",2024,2024,"2024-07-16","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Redevelopment agency's yearly spending plan approved","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071624_minutes.pdf#page=7",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,6.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag060325|94",2025,2025,"2025-06-03","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Interim budget for the city's redevelopment successor agency sent to committee","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag060325_minutes.pdf#page=23",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag060325|95",2025,2025,"2025-06-03","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Redevelopment successor agency budget with $223.0M (≈ $233.4 million in 2026 dollars) of bonds sent to committee","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag060325_minutes.pdf#page=23",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag061725|21",2025,2025,"2025-06-17","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Interim budget for the redevelopment successor agency proposed","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag061725_minutes.pdf#page=7",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag061725|22",2025,2025,"2025-06-17","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Interim budget for former redevelopment agency's successor office approved","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag061725_minutes.pdf#page=7",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,6.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag070825|50",2025,2025,"2025-07-08","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Successor Agency budget and up to $223,000,000 (≈ $233.4 million in 2026 dollars) of bonds proposed","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag070825_minutes.pdf#page=10",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag070825|51",2025,2025,"2025-07-08","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Successor Agency budget and bond resolution held to July 15","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag070825_minutes.pdf#page=10",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071525|40",2025,2025,"2025-07-15","resolution","land-and-building",null,"Successor Agency budget and up to $223,000,000 (≈ $233.4 million in 2026 dollars) of bonds proposed","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071525_minutes.pdf#page=12",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag071525|41",2025,2025,"2025-07-15","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Former redevelopment agency budget and $223M (≈ $233.4 million in 2026 dollars) bonds approved","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag071525_minutes.pdf#page=12",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,6.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:leg060226|120",2026,2026,"2026-06-02","resolution","public-money",null,"Interim budget proposed for the redevelopment successor agency","unverified",null,null,"https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=M&ID=1417764&GUID=3659FBD7-6AFC-450C-82F0-D84A138C15D9",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:leg061626|25",2026,2026,"2026-06-16","resolution","public-money",null,"Interim budget adopted for the redevelopment successor agency","unverified",null,null,"https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=M&ID=1423292&GUID=50EAB13C-AD2E-413A-871C-FEEACB21BE93",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:leg061626|26",2026,2026,"2026-06-16","resolution","running-the-city",null,"Interim budget adopted for the redevelopment successor agency","unverified",null,null,"https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=M&ID=1423292&GUID=50EAB13C-AD2E-413A-871C-FEEACB21BE93",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.0]]}