{"id":null,"ids":[],"kind":"named in documents","name":"San Francisco Superior Court","tied_by":"name","block":null,"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:417/1",1929,1929,"1929-02-28","ordinance",null,null,"Bill 657 would raise San Francisco Superior Court judges' salaries from $9,000 (≈ $177,337 in 2026 dollars) to $12,000 (≈ $236,449 in 2026 dollars) a year; judges spoke in support.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",417,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n417",null,"Bill No. 657. Introduced by the San Francisco Assembly Delegation. Increases the salary of judges of the Superior Court",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:419/7",1929,1929,"1929-02-28","ordinance",null,null,"Board disapproved Bill No. 70 increasing San Francisco Superior Court judges from sixteen to thirty-two.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",419,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n419",null,"Bill No. 70. Introduced by Mr. Williamson. Increases the number of judges of the Superior Court in San Francisco",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:1314/7",1929,1929,"1929-06-17","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","State bill raises San Francisco Superior Court judges' salaries from $9,000 (≈ $177,337 in 2026 dollars) to $10,000 (≈ $197,041 in 2026 dollars) a year, cut from $12,000 (≈ $236,449 in 2026 dollars).","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",1314,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n1314",null,"Assembly Bill No. 657, introduced by San Francisco Assembly Delegation— Increases the annual salaries of the judges of the Superior Court",null,null,"n","a",0,2.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed24sanfrich:1318/4",1929,1929,"1929-06-17","ordinance",null,null,"Bill proposing to raise San Francisco Superior Court judges from 16 to 32 was disapproved in this form.","quoted","journalofproceed24sanfrich",1318,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed24sanfrich/page/n1318",null,"Assembly Bill No. 70, introduced by Mr. Williamson — Provided originally for an increase in the number",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:435/3",1937,1937,"1937-03-08","resolution",null,null,"Proposed resolution endorses Senate Bill 296, raising San Francisco Superior Court judges from sixteen to twenty.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",435,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n428",null,"Board of Supervisors Endorses Senate Bill No. 296, Increasing Judges of Superior Court of State of California,",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed32sanfrich:468/2",1937,1937,"1937-03-15","resolution",null,"passed","Board endorsed State Senate Bill 296, sponsored by Senator Walter McGovern, to raise San Francisco Superior Court judges from sixteen to twenty.","quoted","journalofproceed32sanfrich",468,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed32sanfrich/page/n461",null,"Board of Supervisors Endorses Senate Bill No. 296, Increasing Judges of Superior Court of State of California From Sixteen",null,null,"n","a",0,2.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed34sanfrich:509/3",1939,1939,"1939-02-27","resolution",null,null,"Endorsement of Senate Bill 1094 to raise San Francisco Superior Court judges from sixteen to twenty is proposed.","quoted","journalofproceed34sanfrich",509,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed34sanfrich/page/n503",null,"Endorsing Senate Bill No. 1094, Increasing Judges of the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the City and County of San Francisco From Sixteen to Twenty.",null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed42sanfrich:1491/3",1947,1947,"1947-06-02","resolution",null,"passed","Board endorsed Assembly Bill 1441 to raise San Francisco Superior Court judges from eighteen to twenty-one.","quoted","journalofproceed42sanfrich",1491,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed42sanfrich/page/n1491",null,"Endorsing Assembly Bill No. 1441, to Increase Members of Superior Court Judges. Supervisor Lewis presented: Proposal No. 6877",null,null,"n","a",0,4.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed61sanfrich:1096/2",1966,1966,"1966-12-27","motion",null,"passed","Board congratulated [name withheld] by letter on his appointment as a San Francisco Superior Court judge.","quoted","journalofproceed61sanfrich",1096,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed61sanfrich/page/n1095",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.38],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C123307473:53/13",1973,1972,"Fiscal Year 1972","project","study or report",null,"San Francisco Superior Court block grant · cost usd: 38,500","unverified","C123307473",53,"https://archive.org/details/C123307473/page/n52",null,null,null,"The flow of federal funds : an assessment for San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124879305:3/1",1983,1983,"","finding","study or report",null,"Proposition 8 (San Francisco Superior Court) · finding: not causing more defendants to be sentenced to prison","unverified","C124879305",3,"https://archive.org/details/C124879305/page/n2",null,null,null,"Impact of Proposition 8 on sentencing and dispositions in San Francisco Superior Courts","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124879305:7/1",1983,1983,"JD 82","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Superior Court · finding: reduction in dismissals from 15% to 9% (JD 82)","unverified","C124879305",7,"https://archive.org/details/C124879305/page/n6",null,null,null,"Impact of Proposition 8 on sentencing and dispositions in San Francisco Superior Courts","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124879305:3/4",1983,1983,"January and February 1983","finding","study or report",null,"Proposition 8 (San Francisco Superior Court) · finding: no upward trend in state prison commitments or length of prison terms","unverified","C124879305",3,"https://archive.org/details/C124879305/page/n2",null,null,null,"Impact of Proposition 8 on sentencing and dispositions in San Francisco Superior Courts","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124879305:3/2",1983,1983,"six months after Proposition 8","finding","study or report",null,"Proposition 8 (San Francisco Superior Court) · finding: 40% of cases coming to Superior Court arose through certified felony pleas","unverified","C124879305",3,"https://archive.org/details/C124879305/page/n2",null,null,null,"Impact of Proposition 8 on sentencing and dispositions in San Francisco Superior Courts","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124879305:5/1",1983,1983,"six months before Proposition 8 (1982)","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Superior Court arraignments · other: dropped from 1428 to 1097 arraignments","unverified","C124879305",5,"https://archive.org/details/C124879305/page/n4",null,null,null,"Impact of Proposition 8 on sentencing and dispositions in San Francisco Superior Courts","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124879305:5/2",1983,1983,"six months before Proposition 8 (1982)","finding","study or report",null,"San Francisco Superior Court sentences · other: stayed the same, 1610 to 1559 sentences","unverified","C124879305",5,"https://archive.org/details/C124879305/page/n4",null,null,null,"Impact of Proposition 8 on sentencing and dispositions in San Francisco Superior Courts","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich|310",1985,1985,"1985-05-06","resolution","civic-life","referred","Two more judges urged for San Francisco Superior Court","quoted","journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich",602,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich/page/n589",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich|416",1985,1985,"1985-06-24","resolution","civic-life","passed","Two more judges urged for San Francisco Superior Court","quoted","journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich",845,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed80sanfrich/page/n832",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.79],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124886244:17/3",1985,1985,"December, 1985","finding","study or report",null,"Superior Court sentencing hearings · other: 32 cases referred in first month, saving 224 custody days","unverified","C124886244",17,"https://archive.org/details/C124886244/page/n16",null,null,null,"Report to the mayor from the Jail Overcrowding Committee","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903984:45/1",1991,1991,"1991","recommendation","study or report",null,"Charan investigation domestic violence report · recommendation: Set higher bail for domestic violence cases by the Court","unverified","C124903984",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124903984/page/n44",null,null,null,"San Francisco's response to domestic violence : the Charan investigation : report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903984:45/2",1991,1991,"1991","recommendation","study or report",null,"Charan investigation domestic violence report · recommendation: Schedule domestic violence cases to trial as soon as possible with priority on the trial calendar","unverified","C124903984",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124903984/page/n44",null,null,null,"San Francisco's response to domestic violence : the Charan investigation : report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903984:45/5",1991,1991,"1991","recommendation","study or report",null,"Charan investigation domestic violence report · recommendation: Take a more active role in determining whether the District Attorney's sentencing recommendation is appropriate","unverified","C124903984",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124903984/page/n44",null,null,null,"San Francisco's response to domestic violence : the Charan investigation : report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124903984:45/6",1991,1991,"1991","recommendation","study or report",null,"Charan investigation domestic violence report · recommendation: Ensure a translator is available to victims whether or not the victim is scheduled to testify","unverified","C124903984",45,"https://archive.org/details/C124903984/page/n44",null,null,null,"San Francisco's response to domestic violence : the Charan investigation : report","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich:275/4",1999,1999,"1999-03-12","resolution",null,"referred","Supervisor Newsom urged the San Francisco Superior Court to adopt the One Day or [name withheld] jury system; sent to committee.","quoted","journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich",275,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanmarproceed94sanfrich/page/n274",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesmayaug96sanfrich:37/3",2001,2001,"2001-05-07","ordinance",null,"referred","A proposed ordinance would pay [name withheld] $102,000 (≈ $194,059 in 2026 dollars) to settle her San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit against the City; sent to committee.","quoted","meetingminutesmayaug96sanfrich",37,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesmayaug96sanfrich/page/n36",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesmayaug96sanfrich:37/5",2001,2001,"2001-05-07","ordinance",null,"referred","A proposed ordinance would pay [name withheld] $50,000 (≈ $95,127 in 2026 dollars) to settle his San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit against the City; sent to committee.","quoted","meetingminutesmayaug96sanfrich",37,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesmayaug96sanfrich/page/n36",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2002sanf_0:73/7",2002,2002,"2002-06-10","resolution",null,null,"Resolution proposed commending [name withheld] on his retirement from the San Francisco Superior Court.","quoted","meetingminutesb2002sanf_0",73,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2002sanf_0/page/n72",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingseptdec2005minutes100sanfrich:407/2",2005,2005,null,"resolution",null,"passed","The Board adopted a resolution commending [name withheld] for his contributions to the San Francisco Superior Court, sponsored by Supervisor Sandoval.","quoted","meetingseptdec2005minutes100sanfrich",407,"https://archive.org/details/meetingseptdec2005minutes100sanfrich/page/n398",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/1minutes2005sanf:70/3",2005,2005,"2005-02-23","ordinance",null,null,"Rules Committee recommended a $65,000 (≈ $112,141 in 2026 dollars) settlement of [name withheld] San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit against the City.","quoted","1minutes2005sanf",70,"https://archive.org/details/1minutes2005sanf/page/n69",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/1minutes2005sanf:70/4",2005,2005,"2005-02-23","ordinance",null,null,"Rules Committee recommended a $137,500 (≈ $237,221 in 2026 dollars) settlement of [name withheld] San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit against the City.","quoted","1minutes2005sanf",70,"https://archive.org/details/1minutes2005sanf/page/n69",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjuneaugminutes100sanfrich:257/2",2005,2005,"2005-06-28","ordinance",null,"passed","Passed ordinance appropriating $260,000 (≈ $448,563 in 2026 dollars) from the General Fund Reserve for indigent defense costs in San Francisco Superior Court.","quoted","meetingjuneaugminutes100sanfrich",257,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjuneaugminutes100sanfrich/page/n256",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2005sanf_1:265/2",2005,2005,"2005-06-28","ordinance",null,"passed","$260,000 (≈ $448,563 in 2026 dollars) from the General Fund Reserve approved for indigent defense costs in San Francisco Superior Court cases, passed.","quoted","meetingminutesb2005sanf_1",265,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2005sanf_1/page/n264",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.88],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesdr2006sanf:34/2",2006,2006,"2006-01-17","ordinance",null,"passed","City agreed to pay $53,150 (≈ $88,831 in 2026 dollars) to settle [name withheld] lawsuit filed in 2005 in San Francisco Superior Court.","quoted","meetingminutesdr2006sanf",34,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesdr2006sanf/page/n33",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesdr2006sanf:34/3",2006,2006,"2006-01-17","ordinance",null,"passed","City agreed to pay $190,000 (≈ $317,553 in 2026 dollars) to settle [name withheld] lawsuit filed in November 2001 in San Francisco Superior Court.","quoted","meetingminutesdr2006sanf",34,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesdr2006sanf/page/n33",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesdr2006sanf:34/4",2006,2006,"2006-01-17","ordinance",null,"passed","City agreed to pay $75,000 (≈ $125,350 in 2026 dollars) to settle [name withheld] lawsuit filed in September 2004 in San Francisco Superior Court.","quoted","meetingminutesdr2006sanf",34,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesdr2006sanf/page/n33",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.3],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2008sanf:114/2",2008,2008,"2008-01-15","ordinance",null,null,"Proposed ordinance authorizing an $87,500 (≈ $136,934 in 2026 dollars) settlement of [name withheld] lawsuit against the City, filed in San Francisco Superior Court.","quoted","meetingminutesbo2008sanf",114,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2008sanf/page/n113",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesdr2009sanf:137/4",2009,2009,"2009-03-24","ordinance",null,"passed","Ordinance approves an $85,000 (≈ $133,496 in 2026 dollars) settlement of [name withheld] San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit against the city.","quoted","meetingminutesdr2009sanf",137,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesdr2009sanf/page/n136",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/minutes2009sanf:219/1",2009,2009,"2009-06-04","ordinance",null,null,"Rules Committee recommended an ordinance accepting $30,000 (≈ $47,116 in 2026 dollars) from U.[name withheld] to settle the city's San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit.","quoted","minutes2009sanf",219,"https://archive.org/details/minutes2009sanf/page/n218",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesdr2009sanf:355/3",2009,2009,"2009-06-23","ordinance",null,"passed","City approves paying [name withheld] $50,000 (≈ $78,527 in 2026 dollars) to settle her San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit.","quoted","meetingminutesdr2009sanf",355,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesdr2009sanf/page/n354",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.3],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesd2009sanf_0:265/1",2009,2009,"2009-12-08","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","City proposes paying [name withheld] $230,000 (≈ $361,225 in 2026 dollars) to settle her San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit; passed on first reading.","quoted","meetingminutesd2009sanf_0",265,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesd2009sanf_0/page/n264",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2010sanf_0:124/2",2010,2010,"2010-04-30","ordinance",null,"referred","Proposed $134,000 (≈ $207,057 in 2026 dollars) settlement of [name withheld] San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit against the City; sent to Rules Committee.","quoted","meetingminutesb2010sanf_0",124,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2010sanf_0/page/n123",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2010sanf_0:124/4",2010,2010,"2010-04-30","ordinance",null,"referred","Proposed $29,500 (≈ $45,583 in 2026 dollars) settlement of [name withheld] San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit against the City; sent to Rules Committee.","quoted","meetingminutesb2010sanf_0",124,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2010sanf_0/page/n123",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesd2013sanf_0:293/3",2013,2013,null,"ordinance",null,"referred","A $100,000 (≈ $144,636 in 2026 dollars) settlement with [name withheld] over his San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit was sent to the Rules Committee.","quoted","meetingminutesd2013sanf_0",293,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesd2013sanf_0/page/n292",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-2.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2013sanf_1:188/3",2013,2013,"2013-07-23","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","City proposed paying $350,000 (≈ $506,226 in 2026 dollars) to settle a San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit by [name withheld]; passed on first reading.","quoted","meetingminutesb2013sanf_1",188,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2013sanf_1/page/n187",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.55],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2014sanf:9/3",2014,2014,"2014-06-03","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","City proposes paying [name withheld] $40,000 (≈ $56,931 in 2026 dollars) to settle his San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit; passed on first reading.","quoted","meetingminutesbo2014sanf",9,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2014sanf/page/n8",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.3],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2014sanf:9/4",2014,2014,"2014-06-03","ordinance",null,"passed first reading","City proposes paying [name withheld] $43,000 (≈ $61,201 in 2026 dollars) to settle her San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit; passed on first reading.","quoted","meetingminutesbo2014sanf",9,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2014sanf/page/n8",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.3],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2014sanf:38/1",2014,2014,"2014-06-10","ordinance",null,"passed","Ordinance authorizing payment of $105,000 (≈ $149,444 in 2026 dollars) to [name withheld] to settle her San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit against the City passed.","quoted","meetingminutesbo2014sanf",38,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2014sanf/page/n37",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.38],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2015sanf_2:186/1",2015,2015,"2015-11-03","ordinance",null,"passed","City agreed to pay AIG Property Casualty Company $70,000 (≈ $99,511 in 2026 dollars) to settle a lawsuit filed in San Francisco Superior Court.","quoted","meetingminutesb2015sanf_2",186,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2015sanf_2/page/n185",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag092821|114",2021,2021,"2021-09-28","resolution","city-services",null,"Superior Court urged to put criminal records requests online","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag092821_minutes.pdf#page=25",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag100521|125",2021,2021,"2021-10-05","resolution","city-services",null,"Superior Court urged to put criminal records requests online","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag100521_minutes.pdf#page=24",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag100521|126",2021,2021,"2021-10-05","resolution","running-the-city","passed","Superior Court urged to put criminal records requests online","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag100521_minutes.pdf#page=24",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,1.29],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag101921|133",2021,2021,"2021-10-19","resolution","city-services",null,"Superior Court urged to prioritise criminal trials, sent to committee","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag101921_minutes.pdf#page=31",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sfbos:bag121421|41",2021,2021,"2021-12-14","resolution","city-services","passed","City urges courts to speed criminal trials, open more courtrooms","unverified",null,null,"https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/bag121421_minutes.pdf#page=14",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,1.14]]}