{"id":null,"ids":[],"kind":"named in documents","name":"survey area","tied_by":"name","block":null,"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101744965:83/4",1950,1950,"","event","study or report",null,"External roadside interview survey · other: 15 roadside stations, seven on the San Francisco side of the bay","unverified","C101744965",83,"https://archive.org/details/C101744965/page/n82",null,"A total of 15 roadside stutions were set up, of which seven were on the San Francisco side of the bay.",null,"Transportation planning for San Francisco : a report on the planning procedure and planning and engineering techniques utilized in preparation of the San Francisco long-range circulation plan, 1946-1948","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed46sanfrich|322",1951,1951,"1951-04-16","ordinance","land-and-building",null,"Traffic survey area wording put off another week","unverified","journalofproceed46sanfrich",399,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed46sanfrich/page/n399",null,"Ordinance No (Series of 1939). (Proposed amendment is as follows: (Delete the following language from Section 1: \"... the area bounded by Market Street to Howard Street between Second Street and Sixth Street, or any reasonable alternate location appropriate to the purpose . . .\".) Supervisor Gallagh",null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed60sanfrich:808/4",1965,1965,"1965-11-29","resolution","redevelopment","referred","Proposal to designate the Butchertown Survey Area under state redevelopment law was referred to Rules Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed60sanfrich",808,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed60sanfrich/page/n807",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed60sanfrich|g1475",1965,1965,"1965-11-29","resolution","redevelopment","pending","Butchertown survey area proposal sent to Rules Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed60sanfrich",808,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed60sanfrich/page/n807",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed60sanfrich:875/1",1965,1965,"1965-12-27","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Butchertown was designated a redevelopment survey area under state community redevelopment law, adopted 8 to 2.","quoted","journalofproceed60sanfrich",875,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed60sanfrich/page/n874",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,8.79],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed61sanfrich|g853",1966,1966,"1966-06-15","resolution","redevelopment","pending","Mission Street survey for urban renewal sent to committee","quoted","journalofproceed61sanfrich",471,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed61sanfrich/page/n470",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed61sanfrich:909/2",1966,1966,"1966-10-10","resolution","redevelopment","refused","Surveys and plans for a Mission Street urban renewal survey area proposed; Finance Committee sent it without recommendation.","unverified","journalofproceed61sanfrich",909,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed61sanfrich/page/n908",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed61sanfrich:927/2",1966,1966,"1966-10-17","resolution","redevelopment","tabled","Resolution approving surveys and plans for the Mission Street Survey Area urban renewal project was temporarily postponed.","quoted","journalofproceed61sanfrich",927,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed61sanfrich/page/n926",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed61sanfrich|g1636",1966,1966,"1966-10-17",null,"redevelopment","pending","Plan to survey Mission Street for urban renewal put off","unverified","journalofproceed61sanfrich",927,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed61sanfrich/page/n926",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed61sanfrich|g1637",1966,1966,"1966-10-17",null,"redevelopment","pending","Plan to survey Mission Street for urban renewal put off","unverified","journalofproceed61sanfrich",927,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed61sanfrich/page/n926",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed61sanfrich|g1638",1966,1966,"1966-10-17",null,"redevelopment","pending","Plan to survey Mission Street for urban renewal put off","unverified","journalofproceed61sanfrich",927,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed61sanfrich/page/n926",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed61sanfrich|g1651",1966,1966,"1966-10-17",null,"redevelopment","pending","Mission Street survey plan sent to Finance Committee","unverified","journalofproceed61sanfrich",933,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed61sanfrich/page/n932",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed61sanfrich|g1811",1966,1966,"1966-11-07","resolution","redevelopment","pending","Mission District renewal survey put off to December 19.","quoted","journalofproceed61sanfrich",1036,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed61sanfrich/page/n1035",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed61sanfrich|g1864",1966,1966,"1966-12-19","resolution","redevelopment","pending","Mission Street renewal survey put off for now.","quoted","journalofproceed61sanfrich",1069,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed61sanfrich/page/n1068",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed61sanfrich|g1866",1966,1966,"1966-12-19",null,"redevelopment","unknown","Mission Street renewal survey plan; outcome not shown.","unverified","journalofproceed61sanfrich",1070,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed61sanfrich/page/n1069",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed62sanfrich:192/6",1967,1967,"1967-03-06","resolution","redevelopment","referred","Proposed urban renewal surveys and plans for the Mission Street Survey Area were referred to joint Finance and Planning committee.","quoted","journalofproceed62sanfrich",192,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed62sanfrich/page/n191",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed62sanfrich:227/1",1967,1967,"1967-03-27","resolution","redevelopment","refused","Mission Street Survey Area urban renewal survey and federal funding application were refused adoption by the Board.","quoted","journalofproceed62sanfrich",227,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed62sanfrich/page/n226",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,9.82],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed62sanfrich|g406",1967,1967,"1967-03-27",null,"redevelopment","rejected","Mission Street urban renewal survey plan turned down","unverified","journalofproceed62sanfrich",226,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed62sanfrich/page/n225",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,3.04],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101695203:7/2",1969,1969,"December 27, 1965","agency","plan",null,"Butchertown Survey Area · other: designated by Resolution No. 835-65","unverified","C101695203",7,"https://archive.org/details/C101695203/page/n6",null,null,null,"Butchertown redevelopment plan [official redevelopment plan for the Butchertown approved redevelopment project area","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305323:15/1",1973,1972,"1972","finding","study or report",null,"Generic block type analysis survey area · other: Survey area bounded by Broadway, The Embarcadero, Bryant Street, 13th Street, South Van Ness and Van Ness Avenues","unverified","c123305323",15,"https://archive.org/details/c123305323/page/n14","Broadway",null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Summary : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305323:15/3",1973,1972,"1972","event","study or report",null,"Generic block type analysis survey · other: Each building in about 350 blocks coded by height and use using Sanborn maps","unverified","c123305323",15,"https://archive.org/details/c123305323/page/n14",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Summary : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305323:15/2",1973,1973,"","finding","study or report",null,"Generic block type analysis survey area · other: Survey area includes most of the existing high-rise construction in San Francisco","unverified","c123305323",15,"https://archive.org/details/c123305323/page/n14",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Summary : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/c123305323:19/1",1973,1973,"","finding","study or report",null,"Generic Block Description Forms (block sample, survey area) · other: 54 of 95 selected sample blocks documented","unverified","c123305323",19,"https://archive.org/details/c123305323/page/n18",null,null,null,"Impact of intensive, high-rise development in San Francisco. Summary : an evaluation of alternate development growth strategies, Step 1 - part B, a final feasibility report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101697450:35/1",1976,1976,"","finding","study or report",null,"BART · finding: generally high acceptance of BART, with slightly lower acceptance among residents of areas closest (0 - 1/4-mile) to above-ground lines and stations","unverified","C101697450",35,"https://archive.org/details/C101697450/page/n34",null,null,null,"Analysis of pre-BART urban residential environment survey /","n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalseptdecofproceed71sanfrich|g381",1976,1976,"1976-09-27",null,"redevelopment","passed","Stockton and Washington corner in Chinatown named a redevelopment survey area","unverified","journalseptdecofproceed71sanfrich",136,"https://archive.org/details/journalseptdecofproceed71sanfrich/page/n135",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,8.04],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124906409:26/3",1978,1977,"1977","project","study or report",null,"MTC Workplace Survey · other: employees sampled on every third floor of every ninth block within the survey area","unverified","C124906409",26,"https://archive.org/details/C124906409/page/n25",null,null,null,"Study of workers' location decisions : working paper","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich|g253",1977,1977,"1977-01-24","resolution","redevelopment","pending","Northern waterfront redevelopment survey area proposed","quoted","journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich",82,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich/page/n81",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich|g254",1977,1977,"1977-01-24",null,"redevelopment","pending","Northern waterfront redevelopment survey area sent to committee","unverified","journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich",82,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich/page/n81",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich|g556",1977,1977,"1977-02-22","resolution","redevelopment","unknown","Northern waterfront survey area proposed; no vote shown.","quoted","journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich",178,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich/page/n177",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich|g602",1977,1977,"1977-02-28","resolution","redevelopment","unknown","Northern waterfront survey area proposed; no vote shown.","quoted","journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich",198,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich/page/n197",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich|g603",1977,1977,"1977-02-28",null,"redevelopment","passed","Northern waterfront survey area set; citizens' group to advise","unverified","journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich",198,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich/page/n197",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.04],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich|g2269",1977,1977,"1977-06-27","resolution","redevelopment","unknown","Central Chinatown proposed as possible redevelopment survey area; outcome not shown.","quoted","journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich",686,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich/page/n685",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich|g2270",1977,1977,"1977-06-27",null,"redevelopment","passed","Central Chinatown approved as possible redevelopment survey area","unverified","journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich",686,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanjuneproceed72sanfrich/page/n685",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.04],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich|g1598",1977,1977,"1977-10-31","resolution","redevelopment","unknown","Proposal to move $123,168 (≈ $684,822 in 2026 dollars) of 1977 neighborhood money to waterfront study area; put over to a later meeting; later adopted.","quoted","journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich",457,"https://archive.org/details/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich/page/n456",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich|g1599",1977,1977,"1977-10-31",null,"redevelopment","pending","Waterfront study money shift put off to November 7.","unverified","journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich",457,"https://archive.org/details/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich/page/n456",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich|g1600",1977,1977,"1977-10-31","resolution","redevelopment","unknown","Planning studies for northern waterfront, using 1976 neighborhood money.","quoted","journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich",457,"https://archive.org/details/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich/page/n456",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich|g1601",1977,1977,"1977-10-31",null,"redevelopment","pending","Northern waterfront studies money put off to November 7.","unverified","journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich",457,"https://archive.org/details/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich/page/n456",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich|g1673",1977,1977,"1977-11-07","resolution","redevelopment","passed","$123,168 (≈ $684,822 in 2026 dollars) moved to a Northeastern waterfront study area","quoted","journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich",478,"https://archive.org/details/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich/page/n477",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-0.09],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich|g1674",1977,1977,"1977-11-07",null,"redevelopment","passed","$123,168 (≈ $684,822 in 2026 dollars) moved to a Northeastern waterfront study area.","unverified","journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich",479,"https://archive.org/details/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich/page/n478",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-0.96],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich|g1675",1977,1977,"1977-11-07",null,"redevelopment","rejected","Move to send the $123,168 (≈ $684,822 in 2026 dollars) transfer back to committee failed","unverified","journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich",479,"https://archive.org/details/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich/page/n478",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,2.04],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich|g1676",1977,1977,"1977-11-07",null,"redevelopment","rejected","Move to delay the $123,168 (≈ $684,822 in 2026 dollars) transfer vote failed","unverified","journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich",479,"https://archive.org/details/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich/page/n478",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,2.04],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich|g1677",1977,1977,"1977-11-07",null,"redevelopment","passed","$123,168 (≈ $684,822 in 2026 dollars) transfer approved after attempts to delay it failed","unverified","journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich",479,"https://archive.org/details/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich/page/n478",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,1.04],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich|g1678",1977,1977,"1977-11-07","resolution","redevelopment","passed","City funds for waterfront design and transport studies approved","quoted","journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich",479,"https://archive.org/details/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich/page/n478",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,1.66],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich|g1679",1977,1977,"1977-11-07",null,"redevelopment","passed","City funds for waterfront design and transport studies approved.","unverified","journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich",479,"https://archive.org/details/journajulydeclofproceed72sanfrich/page/n478",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-0.96],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljanjuneofproceed73sanfrich:120/3",1978,1978,"1978-01-23","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Bayview-North residential renewal project in the Bayview District was designated as a survey area under California's Community Redevelopment Law.","quoted","journaljanjuneofproceed73sanfrich",120,"https://archive.org/details/journaljanjuneofproceed73sanfrich/page/n120",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,8.66],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journaljulydecofproceed75sanfrich:450/1",1980,1980,"1980-11-03","motion","redevelopment","passed","The Board voted to hold a joint public meeting with the Redevelopment Agency on December 8, 1980, about the Northeast Waterfront Survey Area.","quoted","journaljulydecofproceed75sanfrich",450,"https://archive.org/details/journaljulydecofproceed75sanfrich/page/n449",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,9.04],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed82septdecsanfrich:150/2",1987,1987,"1987-10-05","resolution","redevelopment",null,"Redevelopment Agency survey area for Fisherman's Wharf is being amended; the vote continues on the next page.","quoted","journalofproceed82septdecsanfrich",150,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed82septdecsanfrich/page/n149",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed82septdecsanfrich:357/4",1987,1987,"1987-11-16","resolution","redevelopment","referred","Proposed redevelopment survey area at Fisherman's Wharf, replacing Resolution 931-87, was referred to the Land Use Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed82septdecsanfrich",357,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed82septdecsanfrich/page/n356",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed82septdecsanfrich:445/2",1987,1987,"1987-12-14","resolution","redevelopment","passed","The Board adopted a resolution designating a redevelopment survey area, rescinding Resolution 931-87 for Fisherman's Wharf.","quoted","journalofproceed82septdecsanfrich",445,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed82septdecsanfrich/page/n444",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.41],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofseptdecproceed83sanfrich|73",1988,1988,"1988-10-11","resolution","land-and-building","referred","Redevelopment survey area proposed around Brewster, Banks and Bradford Streets","quoted","journalofseptdecproceed83sanfrich",158,"https://archive.org/details/journalofseptdecproceed83sanfrich/page/n158",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofseptdecproceed83sanfrich:280/3",1988,1988,"1988-11-07","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Supervisor Walker proposed a redevelopment survey area covering three areas in Bernal Heights East and South Slopes.","quoted","journalofseptdecproceed83sanfrich",280,"https://archive.org/details/journalofseptdecproceed83sanfrich/page/n280",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124905627:35/6",1989,1989,"","recommendation","study or report",null,"Third Street revitalization survey area · proposes: designate Third Street as a survey area to develop a revitalization program","unverified","C124905627",35,"https://archive.org/details/C124905627/page/n34","Third Street",null,null,"South Bayshore plan : a proposal for citizen review","n","m",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceedjanjune85sanfrich:104/2",1990,1990,"1990-01-22","resolution","redevelopment","referred","Supervisors Walker and Alioto proposed a survey area in South of Market under state redevelopment law; referred to Land Use Committee.","quoted","journalofproceedjanjune85sanfrich",104,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceedjanjune85sanfrich/page/n104",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceedjanjune85sanfrich:315/2",1990,1990,"1990-03-12","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Resolution designating a South of Market survey area under California redevelopment law was adopted as amended.","quoted","journalofproceedjanjune85sanfrich",315,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceedjanjune85sanfrich/page/n315",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.91],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed85julydecsanfrich:375/2",1990,1990,"1990-09-24","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Redevelopment Agency survey area was expanded to include a Hunters Point parcel for possible redevelopment study, adopted.","quoted","journalofproceed85julydecsanfrich",375,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed85julydecsanfrich/page/n372",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,7.54],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed85julydecsanfrich:376/1",1990,1990,"1990-09-24","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Board adopted a resolution adding a non-contiguous parcel in Hunters Point to a redevelopment survey area.","quoted","journalofproceed85julydecsanfrich",376,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed85julydecsanfrich/page/n373",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.54],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich:343/2",1991,1991,"1991-07-15","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Board adopted a resolution adding 3,446 square feet at Rincon Point, between Stewart and Spear Streets, to the Northeastern Waterfront survey area.","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich",343,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed86sanfrich/page/n342",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.16],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjuldecproceed87sanfrich:396/6",1992,1992,"1992-10-05","resolution","redevelopment","referred","The Redevelopment Agency proposed adding more land to the South of Market Survey Area; sent to committee.","quoted","journalofjuldecproceed87sanfrich",396,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjuldecproceed87sanfrich/page/n396",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjuldecproceed87sanfrich|144",1992,1992,"1992-10-05","resolution","land-and-building","referred","More land to be added to the South of Market survey area; sent to committee, later adopted","quoted","journalofjuldecproceed87sanfrich",396,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjuldecproceed87sanfrich/page/n396",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjuldecproceed87sanfrich:514/3",1992,1992,"1992-11-09","resolution",null,"passed","Resolution amending Resolution 177-90 designating the South of Market survey area is proposed; vote continues on next page.","quoted","journalofjuldecproceed87sanfrich",514,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjuldecproceed87sanfrich/page/n514",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjuldecproceed87sanfrich:517/1",1992,1992,"1992-11-09","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Resolution adds more land to the South of Market redevelopment survey area and was adopted.","quoted","journalofjuldecproceed87sanfrich",517,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjuldecproceed87sanfrich/page/n517",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.54],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich:335/5",1993,1993,"1993-03-22","resolution","redevelopment","referred","Supervisor Kennedy's resolution proposing a Hunters Point Naval Shipyard survey area under redevelopment law was referred to a select committee.","quoted","journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich",335,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich/page/n334",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich:449/1",1993,1993,"1993-04-19","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Survey area under California redevelopment law designated for the Hunters Point Naval Shipyard.","quoted","journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich",449,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed88janaprsanfrich/page/n448",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.66],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed89sanfrich:89/8",1994,1994,"1994-05-23","resolution","redevelopment","referred","Resolution urging the Mayor to ask the Redevelopment Agency to include a relocated Caltrain station site in a survey area was sent to the board.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed89sanfrich",89,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed89sanfrich/page/n89",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed89sanfrich:104/3",1994,1994,"1994-05-31","resolution","transit","referred","Resolution asking the Redevelopment Agency to prepare a survey area for a relocated Caltrain station was referred to committee.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed89sanfrich",104,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed89sanfrich/page/n104",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed89sanfrich:105/1",1994,1994,"1994-05-31","resolution","redevelopment","referred","Supervisors referred a resolution urging a redevelopment survey area for a relocated Caltrain Station to committee.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed89sanfrich",105,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed89sanfrich/page/n105",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofseptdecproceed89sanfrich:229/7",1994,1994,"1994-11-21","resolution","redevelopment","referred","Resolution designating a South Bayshore redevelopment survey area was referred to Housing and Land Use Committee.","quoted","journalofseptdecproceed89sanfrich",229,"https://archive.org/details/journalofseptdecproceed89sanfrich/page/n228",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofseptdecproceed89sanfrich:241/3",1994,1994,"1994-12-05","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Transbay Transit Terminal survey area at Beale and Market Streets adopted as amended for redevelopment study.","quoted","journalofseptdecproceed89sanfrich",241,"https://archive.org/details/journalofseptdecproceed89sanfrich/page/n240",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.91],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofseptdecproceed89sanfrich:242/1",1994,1994,"1994-12-05","resolution","redevelopment","passed","The Board adopted, as amended, a resolution designating a Transbay Transit Terminal redevelopment survey area at Beale and Market Streets.","quoted","journalofseptdecproceed89sanfrich",242,"https://archive.org/details/journalofseptdecproceed89sanfrich/page/n241",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,7.16],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofseptdecproceed89sanfrich:254/1",1994,1994,"1994-12-05","resolution","redevelopment","referred","Redevelopment Agency proposed a survey area on Treasure Island and Yerba Buena Island; referred to Housing and Land Use Committee.","quoted","journalofseptdecproceed89sanfrich",254,"https://archive.org/details/journalofseptdecproceed89sanfrich/page/n253",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124914193:93/2",1995,1995,"1995","project","study or report",null,"Transbay survey area · other: designated a redevelopment survey area","unverified","C124914193",93,"https://archive.org/details/C124914193/page/n93","Market Street",null,null,"Transbay area plan : background data report","n","m",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanaprproceed90sanfrich:14/4",1995,1995,"1995-01-03","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Board designated a South Bayshore survey area under California redevelopment law.","quoted","journalofjanaprproceed90sanfrich",14,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanaprproceed90sanfrich/page/n13",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.54],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanaprproceed90sanfrich:17/1",1995,1995,"1995-01-03","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Resolution designating Treasure Island and Yerba Buena Island as a redevelopment survey area was adopted.","quoted","journalofjanaprproceed90sanfrich",17,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanaprproceed90sanfrich/page/n16",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.91],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanaprproceed90sanfrich:75/10",1995,1995,"1995-01-23","resolution","redevelopment","referred","Resolution proposing to add real property to the Northeastern Waterfront Survey Area, amending earlier resolutions, was referred to committee.","quoted","journalofjanaprproceed90sanfrich",75,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanaprproceed90sanfrich/page/n74",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-3.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofjanaprproceed90sanfrich:115/3",1995,1995,"1995-02-13","resolution","redevelopment","passed","The Board adopted a resolution adding property to the Northeastern Waterfront Survey Area in the Rincon-South Beach redevelopment plan.","quoted","journalofjanaprproceed90sanfrich",115,"https://archive.org/details/journalofjanaprproceed90sanfrich/page/n114",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.41],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed90sanfrich:131/5",1995,1995,"1995-06-05","resolution","whats-being-built","referred","Hsieh proposed adding land to the Northeastern Waterfront Survey Area for a Rincon Hill sports arena; sent to committee.","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed90sanfrich",131,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed90sanfrich/page/n130",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich:170/3",1995,1995,"1995-10-30","resolution","redevelopment","referred","Proposed resolution designates a Mid-Market survey area under redevelopment law and proposes $225,000 (≈ $497,451 in 2026 dollars) for its first six months.","quoted","journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich",170,"https://archive.org/details/journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich/page/n167",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich:186/8",1995,1995,"1995-11-06","resolution","redevelopment","referred","Proposed Redevelopment Agency survey area for Mid-Market was referred to the Housing and Land Use Committee.","quoted","journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich",186,"https://archive.org/details/journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich/page/n183",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich:240/2",1995,1995,"1995-12-04","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Board adopted designation of the Mid-Market Survey Area under state redevelopment law.","quoted","journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich",240,"https://archive.org/details/journalseptdecofproceed90sanfrich/page/n237",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.66],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed91sanfrich:65/8",1996,1996,"1996-01-16","resolution","redevelopment","referred","Proposed redevelopment survey area covering three former Embarcadero Freeway parcels on Lower Broadway was referred to Budget Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed91sanfrich",65,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed91sanfrich/page/n64",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed91sanfrich:295/8",1996,1996,"1996-04-15","resolution","landmarks-old-buildings","referred","Resolution adds real property to the Northeastern Waterfront Survey Area and was referred to Housing and Land Use Committee.","quoted","journalofproceed91sanfrich",295,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed91sanfrich/page/n294",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich|18",1996,1996,"1996-05-06","resolution","land-and-building","referred","A redevelopment survey area sent to committee","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich",19,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich/page/n18",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich:33/1",1996,1996,"1996-05-13","resolution",null,"passed","Resolution adds real property to the Northeastern Waterfront Survey Area, possibly for a proposed Giants downtown ballpark.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich",33,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich/page/n32",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.25],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich:96/10",1996,1996,"1996-05-28","resolution","redevelopment","referred","A proposal to designate the Mission Bay North Survey Area for redevelopment was sent to the Housing and Land Use Committee.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich",96,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich/page/n95",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich:314/1",1996,1996,"1996-08-12","resolution","redevelopment","continued","Consideration of the Mission Bay North redevelopment survey area resolution was continued to August 19, 1996.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich",314,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich/page/n311",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich:330/1",1996,1996,"1996-08-19","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Mission Bay North survey area designated for redevelopment under state law, adopted.","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich",330,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed91sanfrich/page/n327",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,7.04],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919865:92/10",1997,1997,"1997","finding","environmental impact report",null,"School of the Arts · other: combined weekend evening parking demand of approximately 2,055 spaces, accommodated by 2,420 available spaces","unverified","C124919865",92,"https://archive.org/details/C124919865/page/n91",null,null,null,"School of the Arts master plan : San Francisco Unified School District : draft environmental impact report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919865:92/5",1997,1997,"1997","finding","environmental impact report",null,"School of the Arts · other: combined parking demand of 165 long-term spaces would not be accommodated by available on-street supply","unverified","C124919865",92,"https://archive.org/details/C124919865/page/n91",null,null,null,"School of the Arts master plan : San Francisco Unified School District : draft environmental impact report","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceedjanapr92sanfrich:290/3",1997,1997,"1997-04-14","resolution","redevelopment","referred","Redevelopment Agency proposed adding property to the Northeastern Waterfront Survey Area; sent to committee.","quoted","journalofproceedjanapr92sanfrich",290,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceedjanapr92sanfrich/page/n290",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich|67",1997,1997,"1997-06-09","resolution","land-and-building","passed","Northeastern Waterfront survey area widened to Brannan and Federal Streets","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich",123,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich/page/n122",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.81],["d","qipu:sf/decision/sd:10ccffe5e4",1997,1997,"1997-06-09",null,"works","passed","Lots on Brannan and Federal Streets added to Waterfront survey area","unverified",null,null,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich/page/n122/mode/1up",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.49],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich:232/6",1997,1997,"1997-07-14","resolution","redevelopment","referred","Proposed resolution designates the Mission Bay South Survey Area for redevelopment study; referred to committee.","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich",232,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich/page/n231",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich:363/4",1997,1997,"1997-08-25","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Board designated the Mission Bay South Survey Area under the California Community Redevelopment Law, the first step toward redevelopment.","quoted","journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich",363,"https://archive.org/details/journalofmayaugproceed92sanfrich/page/n362",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.91],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919865:96/3",1997,1997,"June 29, 1996","finding","environmental impact report",null,"survey area parking facilities · finding: a parking demand rate of 0.31 parking spaces per attendee","unverified","C124919865",96,"https://archive.org/details/C124919865/page/n95",null,null,null,"School of the Arts master plan : San Francisco Unified School District : draft environmental impact report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124919865:96/4",1997,1997,"June 29, 1996","finding","environmental impact report",null,"survey area parking facilities · other: 751 vehicles occupying survey area parking facilities","unverified","C124919865",96,"https://archive.org/details/C124919865/page/n95",null,null,null,"School of the Arts master plan : San Francisco Unified School District : draft environmental impact report","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922692:389/7",1997,1997,"May 13, 1996","event","ordinance or legislation",null,"Northeastern Waterfront Survey Area · other: Survey Area expanded for area bounded by King Street, Second Street, Berry Street and Third Street","unverified","C124922692",389,"https://archive.org/details/C124922692/page/n388","King Street",null,null,"San Francisco general plan : amendments to the general plan : adopted between September 1988 and July 1997","n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124910717:165/5",1998,1998,"","site","environmental impact report",null,"Bayview-Hunters Point survey area · other: Extends from Cesar Chavez Street north to the City/County line south, from U.S. 101 west to the Bay east","unverified","C124910717",165,"https://archive.org/details/C124910717/page/n164","Cesar Chavez Street",null,null,"Revised draft environmental impact statement/environmental impact report for the disposal and reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915258:241/1",1998,1998,"","site","environmental impact report",null,"Transbay Redevelopment Plan survey area · other: Area designated a redevelopment survey area","unverified","C124915258",241,"https://archive.org/details/C124915258/page/n240","Embarcadero",null,null,"Draft environmental impact statement/draft environmental impact report for the Third Street light rail project in the City and County of San Francisco","n","m",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915258:241/5",1998,1998,"","site","environmental impact report",null,"Mid-Market Redevelopment Plan survey area · acreage: 109 acres (44 hectares) survey area","unverified","C124915258",241,"https://archive.org/details/C124915258/page/n240","Market Street",null,null,"Draft environmental impact statement/draft environmental impact report for the Third Street light rail project in the City and County of San Francisco","n","m",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124910717:164/1",1998,1998,"1998","site","environmental impact report",null,"Bayview-Hunters Point survey area · other: Proposed redevelopment plan area encompassing almost the entire South Bayshore planning area","unverified","C124910717",164,"https://archive.org/details/C124910717/page/n163",null,null,null,"Revised draft environmental impact statement/environmental impact report for the disposal and reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard","n","m",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124915258:241/6",1998,1998,"December 1995","event","environmental impact report",null,"Mid-Market Redevelopment Plan survey area · other: Designated by the Board of Supervisors","unverified","C124915258",241,"https://archive.org/details/C124915258/page/n240","Market Street",null,null,"Draft environmental impact statement/draft environmental impact report for the Third Street light rail project in the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalaprjuneofproceed94sanfrich|g591",1999,1999,"1999-05-03",null,"redevelopment","pending","Bayview Hunters Point proposed as a redevelopment survey area; introduced.","unverified","journalaprjuneofproceed94sanfrich",166,"https://archive.org/details/journalaprjuneofproceed94sanfrich/page/n165",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalaprjuneofproceed94sanfrich:191/2",1999,1999,"1999-05-10","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Board adopts a resolution naming the Bayview Hunters Point redevelopment survey area, sponsored by Brown, Bierman and Katz.","quoted","journalaprjuneofproceed94sanfrich",191,"https://archive.org/details/journalaprjuneofproceed94sanfrich/page/n190",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.54],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalaprjuneofproceed94sanfrich|g670",1999,1999,"1999-05-10",null,"redevelopment","unknown","Proposal to rename a redevelopment survey area Bayview Hunters Point.","unverified","journalaprjuneofproceed94sanfrich",191,"https://archive.org/details/journalaprjuneofproceed94sanfrich/page/n190",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalaprjuneofproceed94sanfrich|g671",1999,1999,"1999-05-10",null,"redevelopment","passed","Redevelopment survey area now officially named Bayview Hunters Point.","unverified","journalaprjuneofproceed94sanfrich",191,"https://archive.org/details/journalaprjuneofproceed94sanfrich/page/n190",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.04],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922531:157/2",2000,2000,"","site","environmental impact report",null,"Bayview-Hunters Point survey area · other: extends from Cesar Chavez Street on the north to the City/County line","unverified","C124922531",157,"https://archive.org/details/C124922531/page/n156","Cesar Chavez Street",null,null,"Final environmental impact statement for the disposal and reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2000sanf_1:299/4",2000,2000,"2000-11-20","hearing","redevelopment","referred","Supervisor Leno requested a hearing on the Redevelopment Agency's assessment of the Mid-Market survey area, assigned to committee.","quoted","meetingminutesb2000sanf_1",299,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2000sanf_1/page/n298",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingseptdecminutes95sanfrich:303/4",2000,2000,"2000-11-20","hearing","redevelopment","referred","Supervisor Leno requested a hearing on the Redevelopment Agency's assessment of the Mid-Market Survey Area, sent to Transportation and Land Use Committee.","quoted","meetingseptdecminutes95sanfrich",303,"https://archive.org/details/meetingseptdecminutes95sanfrich/page/n298",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2000sanf_1:338/2",2000,2000,"2000-12-04","hearing","redevelopment","referred","Supervisor Leno requested a hearing on whether the Transbay Survey Area could become a redevelopment project; referred to committee.","quoted","meetingminutesb2000sanf_1",338,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2000sanf_1/page/n337",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingseptdecminutes95sanfrich:342/2",2000,2000,"2000-12-04","hearing","redevelopment","referred","Supervisor Leno requested a hearing on whether the Transbay Survey Area could become a redevelopment project; sent to committee.","quoted","meetingseptdecminutes95sanfrich",342,"https://archive.org/details/meetingseptdecminutes95sanfrich/page/n337",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101694856:104/4",2002,2002,"","measure","plan",null,"Mid-Market redevelopment survey area · proposes: re-zone to include mixed-use residential areas and reduced residential parking requirements","unverified","C101694856",104,"https://archive.org/details/C101694856/page/n103",null,null,null,"Housing element : an element of the San Francisco general plan : draft for public review","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124925579:130/1",2003,2003,"","measure","plan",null,"Mid-Market redevelopment survey area · rezoned: re-zoned to include mixed-use residential areas and reduced residential parking requirements","unverified","C124925579",130,"https://archive.org/details/C124925579/page/n129",null,null,null,"Housing element : an element of the San Francisco general plan : final draft for public review","n","a",0,3.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101746510:153/2",2004,2004,"","measure","plan",null,"Mid-Market redevelopment survey area · proposes: Re-zone to include mixed-use residential areas and reduced residential parking requirements","unverified","C101746510",153,"https://archive.org/details/C101746510/page/n152",null,null,null,"Housing element : an element of the San Francisco general plan","n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjanmar2005minutes100sanfrich:40/3",2005,2005,null,"hearing","redevelopment","referred","Supervisor Maxwell requested a hearing on a Redevelopment Agency survey area for the Visitacion Valley Plan Area; sent to Land Use Committee.","quoted","meetingjanmar2005minutes100sanfrich",40,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjanmar2005minutes100sanfrich/page/n40",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,4.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2005sanf_1:27/2",2005,2005,null,"resolution","redevelopment","passed","Visitacion Valley Survey Area designated under California Community Redevelopment Law, adopted as resolution 424-05.","quoted","meetingminutesb2005sanf_1",27,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2005sanf_1/page/n26",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.54],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2005sanf:285/6",2005,2005,null,"resolution",null,null,"Resolution proposed by Supervisor Maxwell to designate a Visitacion Valley survey area; text continues on the next page.","quoted","meetingminutesbo2005sanf",285,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2005sanf/page/n284",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,0.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesbo2005sanf:41/3",2005,2005,null,"hearing","redevelopment","referred","Supervisor Maxwell asked for a hearing on a possible Redevelopment Agency survey area in Visitacion Valley; referred to committee.","quoted","meetingminutesbo2005sanf",41,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesbo2005sanf/page/n40",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,1.5],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjanmar2005minutes100sanfrich|g585",2005,2005,"2005-03-15","resolution","redevelopment","pending","Visitacion Valley proposed as redevelopment survey area.","quoted","meetingjanmar2005minutes100sanfrich",284,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjanmar2005minutes100sanfrich/page/n284",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,3.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingjuneaugminutes100sanfrich|g31",2005,2005,"2005-06-07","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Visitacion Valley named a possible redevelopment survey area.","quoted","meetingjuneaugminutes100sanfrich",27,"https://archive.org/details/meetingjuneaugminutes100sanfrich/page/n26",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,7.16],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesd2008sanf_0:245/2",2008,2008,"2008-10-07","resolution","redevelopment","referred","Resolution designating an amended Treasure Island and Yerba Buena Island survey area was sent to the Land Use Committee.","quoted","meetingminutesd2008sanf_0",245,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesd2008sanf_0/page/n244",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesb2008sanf_2:323/2",2008,2008,"2008-10-28","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Amended survey area on Treasure Island and Yerba Buena Island designated under redevelopment law, adopted.","quoted","meetingminutesb2008sanf_2",323,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesb2008sanf_2/page/n322",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.54],["d","qipu:sf/decision/meetingminutesd2008sanf_0:276/4",2008,2008,"2008-10-28","resolution","redevelopment","passed","Amended Treasure Island and Yerba Buena Island survey area designated under California redevelopment law; adopted.","quoted","meetingminutesd2008sanf_0",276,"https://archive.org/details/meetingminutesd2008sanf_0/page/n275",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,6.41]]}