{"id":null,"ids":[],"kind":"named in documents","name":"Union Square area","tied_by":"name","block":null,"release":"v0.7.1","rows_columns":["t","id","year","y","date","kind","topic","outcome","summary","tier","source","leaf","scan","addr","quote","note","title","how","g","rec","sc"],"rows":[["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed59sanfrich|g1376",1964,1964,"1964-11-16",null,"other","pending","Union Square area measure delayed two weeks.","unverified","journalofproceed59sanfrich",898,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed59sanfrich/page/n895",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed59sanfrich|419",1964,1964,"1964-11-23","ordinance","running-the-city","pending","Height limits proposed for buildings in the Union Square area","quoted","journalofproceed59sanfrich",917,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed59sanfrich/page/n914",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed59sanfrich:925/3",1964,1964,"1964-11-30","ordinance","whats-being-built",null,"Special height districts for the Union Square Area were proposed in the City Planning Code, with the vote continuing on the next page.","quoted","journalofproceed59sanfrich",925,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed59sanfrich/page/n922",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalofproceed66sanfrich|g521",1971,1971,"1971-04-05","motion","traffic","pending","Union Square car-free days idea sent to committee.","quoted","journalofproceed66sanfrich",257,"https://archive.org/details/journalofproceed66sanfrich/page/n257",null,null,null,null,"n","m",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:17/10008",1984,1984,"","finding","ordinance or legislation",null,"Union Square area · other: contains many of the city's finest shops and hotels","unverified","C124887761",17,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n16",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:17/5",1984,1984,"","site","ordinance or legislation",null,"Union Square area · other: Contains many of the city's finest shops and hotels; one of the strongest downtown retail districts in the country","unverified","C124887761",17,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n16",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887761:21/4",1984,1984,"","finding","ordinance or legislation",null,"Retail core near Union Square · other: Maintain high quality specialty retail shopping facilities in the retail core","unverified","C124887761",21,"https://archive.org/details/C124887761/page/n20",null,null,null,"Downtown : proposal as adopted by the City Planning Commission as a part of the master plan","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124887752:223/1",1985,1985,"Since the 1920's","site","ordinance or legislation",null,"Grant Avenue/Union Square retail area · other: City's premier shopping district","unverified","C124887752",223,"https://archive.org/details/C124887752/page/n222","Grant Avenue",null,null,"Downtown plan : an ordinance of the City and County of San Francisco","n","a",0,-1.0],["d","qipu:sf/decision/journalmayaugofproceed82sanfrich|19",1987,1987,"1987-05-04","resolution","land-and-building","passed","Fast food ban imposed in the Union Square area","quoted","journalmayaugofproceed82sanfrich",19,"https://archive.org/details/journalmayaugofproceed82sanfrich/page/n19",null,null,null,null,"n","a",0,2.17],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124905937:109/1",1990,1990,"","finding","study or report",null,"Union Square area and Chinatown UMBs · finding: Alternatives would not make much difference in the pace of new development or conversions","unverified","C124905937",109,"https://archive.org/details/C124905937/page/n108",null,null,null,"Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124905937:109/2",1990,1990,"","finding","study or report",null,"Union Square area UMB owners · finding: Building owners would be unlikely to look for alternatives to retrofitting their building","unverified","C124905937",109,"https://archive.org/details/C124905937/page/n108",null,null,null,"Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124905937:33/1",1990,1990,"","finding","study or report",null,"Union Square area UMBs · other: not much potential for new development, except south of Market Street","unverified","C124905937",33,"https://archive.org/details/C124905937/page/n32",null,null,null,"Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124905937:33/2",1990,1990,"","finding","study or report",null,"Union Square area UMBs · other: relatively large share of space in commercial/industrial UMBs","unverified","C124905937",33,"https://archive.org/details/C124905937/page/n32",null,null,null,"Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124905937:33/3",1990,1990,"","finding","study or report",null,"Union Square area UMBs · use: tourist hotels are an important component of the UMB building stock","unverified","C124905937",33,"https://archive.org/details/C124905937/page/n32",null,null,null,"Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124905937:33/4",1990,1990,"","finding","study or report",null,"Union Square area UMBs · other: conservation district controls; many are significant buildings","unverified","C124905937",33,"https://archive.org/details/C124905937/page/n32",null,null,null,"Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124905937:33/5",1990,1990,"","finding","study or report",null,"Union Square area UMBs · other: retail rents can be very high; UMBs in strong locations well maintained","unverified","C124905937",33,"https://archive.org/details/C124905937/page/n32",null,null,null,"Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124905937:79/1",1990,1990,"","finding","study or report",null,"UMB owner-burden ratios by location · finding: lowest owner-burden ratios under all three Alternatives","unverified","C124905937",79,"https://archive.org/details/C124905937/page/n78",null,null,null,"Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C101696696:76/4",1994,1994,"","finding","study or report",null,"Union Square hotel blocks · finding: Not sufficient space for a new convention facility between the Union Square hotels, Chinatown, and the Financial District to the east","unverified","C101696696",76,"https://archive.org/details/C101696696/page/n75",null,null,null,"San Francisco needs assessment for additional meeting and/or exhibit space","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922692:213/3",1997,1997,"","finding","ordinance or legislation",null,"Union Square area · other: over ninety percent of 13 million annual visitors walk through the Union Square area","unverified","C124922692",213,"https://archive.org/details/C124922692/page/n212",null,null,null,"San Francisco general plan : amendments to the general plan : adopted between September 1988 and July 1997","n","a",0,-1.0],["f","dl-sf-facts-v1.1-haiku55-2026-10/C124922692:238/2",1997,1997,"","recommendation","ordinance or legislation",null,"Pedestrian improvement standards, Second Level · recommendation: Fedestal mounts required in Union Square area and on Kearny; strongly encouraged elsewhere","unverified","C124922692",238,"https://archive.org/details/C124922692/page/n237","Kearny Street",null,null,"San Francisco general plan : amendments to the general plan : adopted between September 1988 and July 1997","n","a",0,-1.0]]}