Law · act
Raker Act
A law in 98 Board decisions, 1920–2001.
98Board decisions about it
1920–2001first and last decision
In short
- 9 Feb 1920Resolution proposed condemning a Daily Commercial News article on the Raker Act as libelous and discouraging water bond investors.
- 31 Oct 1927Two city-owned Tuolumne County parcels near Yosemite are approved for conveyance to the United States under the Raker Act.
- 13 Mar 1939Board resolves to ask Congress to amend the Raker Act so the city may sell Hetch Hetchy power.
- 11 Sep 1941Supervisor Uhl asked the City Attorney for a written opinion on the forfeiture clause in the Raker Act.
- 10 Apr 1978Budget Analyst was directed to analyze the Raker Act and draft a resolution asking Congress to amend it.
Who appears together
Lines show who appears in the same decisions. It doesn't mean they made a deal.
People
- Arthur M. Brown, Jr.proposed 4 · 1938–41
- Adolph Uhlproposed 3 · 1940–42
- Jesse Colmanproposed 3 · 1935–39
Organisations
- Pacific Gas and Electric Companynamed in 2
- United States governmentnamed in 1 · city body
Places
- Federal Stnamed in 2
- Frederick Stnamed in 1
- Masonic Avenamed in 1
More from the records
Who was paid · 1 organisations
| United States government | 1 decision |
How many decisions pay each one; amounts are not shown until a person checks them.
Votes · 41 roll calls
yes 393no 32absent 83
41 printed roll calls; 21 were unanimous.
Decisions, by type
| resolution | 42 |
| motion | 19 |
| ordinance | 16 |
| other | 14 |
| hearing | 3 |
| communication | 2 |
Decisions, by outcome
| passed | 30 |
| referred | 9 |
| passed first reading | 5 |
| continued | 4 |
| amended | 3 |
| refused | 1 |
46 decisions have no outcome read yet.
All 98 decisions · in date order
- Resolution proposed condemning a Daily Commercial News article on the Raker Act as libelous and discouraging water bond investors.
- Counsel's record explains the City's contract with Pacific Gas and Electric for Moccasin plant power, in view of Raker Act duties.
- Motion refers Hetch Hetchy Valley road and trail obligations under the Raker Act to the Public Utilities Committee.
- Proposed resolution would convey City-owned Tuolumne County land within Yosemite National Park back to the United States under the Raker Act.
- Resolution proposed to convey city-owned land in Tuolumne County to the United States under the Raker Act.
- Two city-owned Tuolumne County parcels near Yosemite are approved for conveyance to the United States under the Raker Act.
- Resolution proposed to convey city-owned Tuolumne County land in Section Sixteen to the United States under the Raker Act.
- Supervisor Shannon presented a resolution on federal complaints that the city has not complied with Raker Act terms on Hetch Hetchy.
- Board approved a draft reply to the Secretary of the Interior on the city's Raker Act obligations, to be sent by the Mayor.
- A resolution to convey city-owned Yosemite land to the United States under the Raker Act was passed for printing.
- A draft reply to the Secretary of the Interior on the city's Raker Act obligations was approved, for the Mayor to forward.
- Scenic road above Hetch Hetchy owed under the Raker Act
Pages that mention it · 80
Scanned pages whose text has the name: 76 Board journal pages, 4 city report pages.
Journal 1920
Journal 1935
Journal 1939
Journal 1940