Qipudata
San Francisco · v0.7.1

All decisions

about 150 Board decisions about Salary Standardization Ordinance, in date order. Each links to its printed page.

  • Salary Standardization Ordinance referred back to Civil Service Commission for revision and resubmission.
    10 Sep 1931passedJournal 1931, p. 2781 ↗
  • Proposed clerical salary schedules, amending the Salary Standardization Ordinance, had consideration continued with no new date printed.
    16 Mar 1942continuedJournal 1942, p. 399 ↗
  • Proposed ordinance adds clerical service salary schedules to the Salary Standardization Ordinance, effective July 1, 1942.
    23 Mar 1942outcome not readJournal 1942 ↗
  • Board finally passed an ordinance adding Section 9.1 to the Salary Standardization Ordinance and setting new compensation schedules.
    6 Apr 1942passedJournal 1942, p. 524 ↗
  • Clerical salary schedules for city positions were finally passed, effective July 1, 1942, amending the Salary Standardization Ordinance.
    6 Apr 1942passedJournal 1942, p. 522 ↗
  • Proposal to add a Division B clerical service pay schedule to the Salary Standardization Ordinance, effective July 1, 1942.
    13 Apr 1942outcome not readJournal 1942, p. 611 ↗
  • Proposed amendment adds pay schedules for custodial and detention service workers to the Salary Standardization Ordinance.
    20 Apr 1942outcome not readJournal 1942, p. 661 ↗
  • Proposal to add a Division B clerical salary schedule to the Salary Standardization Ordinance was indefinitely postponed.
    4 May 1942outcome not readJournal 1942, p. 796 ↗
  • Salary Standardization Ordinance finally passed by the Board, setting pay ranges for city employees, with nine ayes and two noes.
    11 May 1942passedJournal 1942, p. 869 ↗
  • Ordinance amending the Salary Standardization Ordinance passed for second reading, substituting four earlier bills.
    25 May 1942outcome not readJournal 1942, p. 975 ↗
  • Salary corrections for many city departments under the Salary Standardization Ordinance were approved by the Mayor.
  • Board adopted Resolution 3392 setting aside $60,000 for overtime pay of monthly-paid city employees under the Salary Standardization Ordinance.
  • Board approved corrections to city department salary rates to conform with the Salary Standardization Ordinance.
  • James T. Davis's suggested substitution for a Salary Standardization Ordinance paragraph was referred to the Finance Committee.
    6 Jul 1943referredJournal 1943 ↗
  • Supervisor Green's proposed amendment to the Salary Standardization Ordinance, defining administrative and executive positions, was referred to the Finance Committee.
    16 Aug 1943referredJournal 1943 ↗
  • Proposed changes to the Salary Standardization Ordinance on a five-day week were announced for Finance Committee discussion.
    27 Sep 1943outcome not readJournal 1943, p. 2227 ↗
  • Supervisors tabled Bill No. 2800, the Salary Standardization Ordinance, by a 10-0 vote, with Brown absent.
    20 Mar 1944tabledJournal 1944, p. 551 ↗
  • The Board passed the Salary Standardization Ordinance as an emergency measure, 10 to 1, so it takes effect for the coming fiscal year.
    30 Mar 1944passedJournal 1944, p. 702 ↗
  • The Salary Standardization Ordinance, Bill No. 2809, setting city employee pay schedules, was taken up for final passage; the vote is not printed here.
    30 Mar 1944outcome not readJournal 1944, p. 682 ↗
  • Supervisor Mead proposed raising pay rates for several city job classes in the Salary Standardization Ordinance.
    30 Mar 1944outcome not readJournal 1944, p. 714 ↗
  • Salary Standardization Ordinance finally passed on emergency basis, fixing city employee pay schedules effective July 1, 1944.
    30 Mar 1944passedJournal 1944, p. 683 ↗
  • Mayor Lapham signed the 1944-45 Salary Standardization Ordinance, saying his signature did not mean full approval.
    2 Jan 1945outcome not readJournal 1945 ↗
  • Mayor Rossi approved the Salary Standardization Ordinance reluctantly as a compromise, setting pay rates for many City employees.
    2 Jan 1945outcome not readJournal 1945 ↗
  • The Board resumed debate on the Salary Standardization Ordinance, which sets city employee pay, and no final vote appears on this page.
    6 Mar 1946outcome not readJournal 1946, p. 518 ↗
  • Salary Standardization Ordinance passed on first reading, setting city employee pay under Charter Sections 151 and 151.1, pending final passage.
    7 Mar 1946passed first readingJournal 1946, p. 531 ↗
  • Salary Standardization Ordinance, setting city employee pay schedules, passed for second reading by nine ayes to two noes.
    7 Mar 1946passed first readingJournal 1946, p. 550 ↗
  • Supervisors presented the Salary Standardization Ordinance setting pay schedules for city and school district employees, effective July 1, 1946.
    7 Mar 1946outcome not readJournal 1946, p. 532 ↗
  • Supervisor Mead moved to pass the Salary Standardization Ordinance, Bill 3966, notwithstanding the Mayor's veto.
    20 Mar 1946outcome not readJournal 1946, p. 707 ↗
  • Mayor vetoed the Salary Standardization Ordinance, which fixed city employees' pay for fiscal 1946-47, and returned it to the Board.
    20 Mar 1946vetoedJournal 1946, p. 673 ↗
  • Supervisor Mead moved to reconsider Bill 3966, the Salary Standardization Ordinance, after the Mayor vetoed it.
    20 Mar 1946outcome not readJournal 1946, p. 705 ↗
  • Salary Standardization Ordinance passed March 18, 1946 was vetoed by Mayor Lapham; supervisors debated reconsidering it.
    20 Mar 1946vetoedJournal 1946, p. 704 ↗
  • Salary Standardization Ordinance setting city employee pay schedules proposed for second reading.
    13 Mar 1947outcome not readJournal 1947, p. 534 ↗
  • Board finally passed the Salary Standardization Ordinance under Charter Sections 151 and 151.1, effective July 1, 1948.
    22 Mar 1948passedJournal 1948, p. 173 ↗
  • Supervisor Gallagher's motion, on Civil Service Commission advice, replaced a paragraph of the Salary Standardization Ordinance and carried.
    7 Mar 1949passedJournal 1949, p. 172 ↗
  • The Salary Standardization Ordinance, effective July 1, 1949, passed for second reading as amended by the Finance Committee.
    7 Mar 1949passed first readingJournal 1949, p. 172 ↗
  • Supervisor Gallagher moved a substitute amending the salary schedule of the proposed Salary Standardization Ordinance, File No. 3618.
    7 Mar 1949outcome not readJournal 1949, p. 166 ↗
  • Controller ordered to adjust 1949-50 budget estimates to match the Salary Standardization Ordinance.
    20 May 1949passedJournal 1949, p. 493 ↗
  • Board continues debate on the Salary Standardization Ordinance setting city employee pay, with a substitute motion by Supervisor Halley pending.
    13 Mar 1950outcome not readJournal 1950, p. 218 ↗
  • Motion to repeal the Salary Standardization Ordinance, which faced a referendum, was refused passage for second reading.
    1 May 1950refusedJournal 1950 ↗
  • Board ordered department budgets adjusted so new salary schedules under the Salary Standardization Ordinance take effect July 1, 1951.
    21 May 1951passedJournal 1951, p. 542 ↗
  • Motion to commend the Finance Committee for its handling of the Salary Standardization Ordinance drew objection and no Board action was taken.
    10 Mar 1952outcome not readJournal 1952, p. 175 ↗
  • Salary Standardization Ordinance, as amended with Finance Committee administrative provisions, passed for second reading by the Board.
    10 Mar 1952passed first readingJournal 1952, p. 166 ↗
  • Clerk of the Board and Chief Assistant Clerk commended for their help on the Salary Standardization Ordinance.
    10 Mar 1952passedJournal 1952, p. 175 ↗
  • Supervisor Gallagher moved to rescind Board [name withheld] of the Salary Standardization Ordinance, File 7846.
    20 Mar 1952outcome not readJournal 1952, p. 205 ↗
  • Board finally passed the Salary Standardization Ordinance fixing municipal employee pay schedules, effective July 1, 1952.
    20 Mar 1952passedJournal 1952, p. 208 ↗
  • Administrative provisions of the Salary Standardization Ordinance for 1953-54 were referred to the Finance Committee.
    16 Feb 1953referredJournal 1953, p. 113 ↗
  • Salary standardization motion adopted, sending requested pay data to the Civil Service Commission for review and report.
    23 Feb 1954passedJournal 1954, p. 172 ↗
  • After an earlier approval was rescinded, the Salary Standardization Ordinance was passed for second reading by a 7-3 vote.
    9 Mar 1954passed first readingJournal 1954 ↗
  • The Board adopted the Finance Committee's motion rejecting proposed administrative amendments to the 1954-1955 Salary Standardization Ordinance.
    9 Mar 1954passedJournal 1954, p. 222 ↗
  • The Board passed the Salary Standardization Ordinance of 1955 for second reading after adopting Finance Committee amendments to the pay survey.
    7 Mar 1955passed first readingJournal 1955 ↗
  • Supervisors adopted Finance Committee amendments to the 1955 Salary Standardization Ordinance setting city employee pay, with the measure still pending.
    7 Mar 1955amendedJournal 1955, p. 145 ↗
  • Board amends the 1955 Salary Standardization Ordinance, setting new monthly pay ranges for several city job classifications.
    7 Mar 1955amendedJournal 1955, p. 146 ↗
  • Salary Standardization Ordinance, sections 151 and 151.1, was finally passed, effective July 1, 1955.
    14 Mar 1955passedJournal 1955, p. 159 ↗
  • Supervisor McAteer's suggested amendment to the Salary Standardization Ordinance was referred to the Finance Committee.
    14 Mar 1955referredJournal 1955, p. 179 ↗
  • Proposed as a substitute: Finance Committee majority pay schedule amendments to the 1956 Salary Standardization Ordinance.
    12 Mar 1956outcome not readJournal 1956, p. 150 ↗
  • Supervisor McCarty proposed amending the 1957 Salary Standardization Ordinance to change [name withheld] and time off for city employees.
    25 Feb 1957outcome not readJournal 1957, p. 109 ↗
  • [name withheld] amendment to the Salary Standardization Ordinance adopted on a 7-4 vote, paying time and one-half for holiday work.
    11 Mar 1957passedJournal 1957, p. 141 ↗
  • Board amended the Salary Standardization Ordinance so employees working holidays receive 12 hours' pay for 8 hours worked.
    11 Mar 1957passedJournal 1957, p. 143 ↗
  • Board adopted Dobbs motion that new inter-departmental positions follow Civil Service classifications and Salary Standardization Ordinance, with tenure set by Civil Service Commission.
    15 May 1957passedJournal 1957, p. 328 ↗
  • Proposed Salary Standardization Ordinance setting city employee pay, effective July 1, 1959, was referred to the Finance Committee.
    16 Feb 1959referredJournal 1959 ↗
  • Salary Standardization Ordinance of 1959, setting city employee pay ranges, passed for second reading as amended.
    9 Mar 1959passed first readingJournal 1959, p. 141 ↗
  • A proposed emergency ordinance amending the Salary Standardization Ordinance sets new pay and working conditions for certain city classes from July 1, 1960.
    11 Jul 1960passedJournal 1960, p. 422 ↗
  • City worker pay changes put off to March 5.
    19 Feb 1962pendingJournal 1962, p. 95 ↗
  • Amendment to city worker pay plan carried
    5 Mar 1962passedJournal 1962, p. 117 ↗
  • Weekly pay for city auto mechanics; decision not shown here.
    2 Jul 1962passedJournal 1962 ↗
  • Salary Standardization Ordinance amendments setting pay schedules and working conditions for certain city classes were finally passed, effective July 1, 1962.
    23 Jul 1962passedJournal 1962, p. 388 ↗
  • Supervisor Tinney moved amendments to the Salary Standardization Ordinance's pay schedules for miscellaneous city employees, with Judiciary Committee recommendations.
    4 Mar 1963outcome not readJournal 1963, p. 99 ↗
  • Committee recommends pay schedule changes for city staff; no vote shown.
    2 Mar 1964passed first readingJournal 1964, p. 136 ↗
  • One city worker gets extra weekly pay under court ruling
    9 Mar 1964passedJournal 1964, p. 159 ↗
  • New numbered job titles and rule changes described; not yet final.
    28 Feb 1966pendingJournal 1966, p. 129 ↗
  • Salary schedule for city miscellaneous employees adopted for the 1966 Salary Standardization Ordinance, with a janitress's pay raised by amendment.
    28 Feb 1966passedJournal 1966, p. 132 ↗
  • Pay and work rules for most city workers set from July 1966
    14 Mar 1966passedJournal 1966, p. 170 ↗
  • City staff pay rates from July 1; result not shown.
    24 Jul 1967outcome not readJournal 1967, p. 616 ↗
  • City pay standards for 1968 moved to final vote.
    22 Jul 1968pendingJournal 1968, p. 610 ↗
  • Clarifies city worker pay rules under union contracts; first vote only.
    9 Dec 1968pendingJournal 1968, p. 947 ↗
  • Board finally passed an ordinance adjusting the Salary Standardization Ordinance to match existing collective bargaining agreements.
    16 Dec 1968passedJournal 1968, p. 954 ↗
  • Easements swapped with Redwood City over the Hetch Hetchy right-of-way
    3 Mar 1969passed first readingJournal 1969, p. 180 ↗
  • Pay schedules set for city and school district workers from July 1.
    12 May 1969passedJournal 1969, p. 385 ↗
  • Proposed correction to the Salary Standardization Ordinance changing the fiscal year for certain fringe benefits; outcome continues next page.
    14 Oct 1969passedJournal 1969, p. 858 ↗
  • Salary Standardization Ordinance passed for second reading as amended, restoring premium shifts to begin at 2:00 p.m.
    9 Mar 1970passed first readingJournal 1970, p. 160 ↗
  • Pay schedule set for most city workers from July 1971
    15 Mar 1971passedJournal 1971 ↗
  • City worker pay rates proposed to be adjusted from July 1.
    26 Apr 1971pendingJournal 1971, p. 257 ↗
  • Clerical corrections to the Salary Standardization Ordinance, fixing pay rates and class numbers for several museum and engineering jobs, passed for second reading.
    6 Jul 1971passed first readingJournal 1971, p. 487 ↗
  • Pay increases for some skilled city trades
    12 Oct 1971pendingJournal 1971, p. 726 ↗
  • Board adopted administrative provisions of the Salary Standardization Ordinance for city employee pay, with listed exceptions added.
    13 Mar 1972passedJournal 1972, p. 200 ↗
  • Salary Standardization Ordinance setting pay for miscellaneous city employees from July 1, 1972 was debated; amendments pending.
    13 Mar 1972pendingJournal 1972, p. 197 ↗
  • Pay rates for several city posts corrected in the Salary Standardization Ordinance and finally passed.
    24 Jul 1972passedJournal 1972, p. 641 ↗
  • Salary Standardization Ordinance taken up out of order and temporarily postponed by the Board.
    12 Mar 1973continuedJournal 1973, p. 213 ↗
  • Salary Standardization Ordinance for policemen and firemen was amended and finally passed, effective July 1, 1973.
    19 Mar 1973passedJournal 1973, p. 248 ↗
  • Board asked the Civil Service Commission to correct a clerical error in the Salary Standardization Ordinance.
    19 Mar 1973outcome not readJournal 1973, p. 263 ↗
  • Salary Standardization Ordinance amendments passed for second reading as amended by the Board, with a 6-3 vote.
    4 Mar 1974passed first readingJournal 1974, p. 234 ↗
  • Pay rules for city workers postponed to March 14.
    13 Mar 1974pendingJournal 1974, p. 267 ↗
  • Pay changes for miscellaneous city workers still pending.
    15 Mar 1974pendingJournal 1974, p. 261 ↗
  • Salary Standardization Ordinance for miscellaneous city employees, effective July 1, 1974, was finally passed.
    25 Mar 1974passedJournal 1974, p. 349 ↗
  • Only the next item's title appears here; no vote
    30 Jun 1975continuedJournal 1975, p. 710 ↗
  • Rules for city workers' pay updated.
    7 Jul 1975passedJournal 1975, p. 729 ↗
  • The Board resumed consideration of employee relations matters tied to the Salary Standardization Ordinance for city employees; no outcome is printed on this page.
    13 Apr 1976outcome not readJournal 1976, p. 374 ↗
  • Pay rules for city workers put off again.
    14 Apr 1976pendingJournal 1976, p. 378 ↗
  • Employee relations matters under the Salary Standardization Ordinance were filed, ending Board consideration.
    15 Apr 1976outcome not readJournal 1976, p. 384 ↗
  • Board continued consideration of employee salary matters under the Salary Standardization Ordinance to its next recessed meeting.
    7 May 1976continuedJournal 1976, p. 442 ↗
  • Hazard pay fix to pay plan reversed
    21 Jun 1976passedJournal 1976, p. 612 ↗
  • Clerical fixes to city pay rules set aside for now.
    21 Jun 1976pendingJournal 1976, p. 614 ↗
  • Board tabled a separate clerical-error ordinance amending the 1976-77 Salary Standardization Ordinance after folding its provisions into File 106-76-7.
    21 Jun 1976tabledJournal 1976, p. 615 ↗
  • Board tabled an ordinance correcting clerical errors in the 1976-77 Salary Standardization Ordinance after a motion to recess into executive session.
    21 Jun 1976tabledJournal 1976, p. 613 ↗
  • Board passed on first reading a further clerical correction to the Salary Standardization Ordinance, covering various sections and pay rates.
    21 Jun 1976passed first readingJournal 1976, p. 612 ↗
  • Fixes mistakes in city employee pay rules.
    6 Jul 1976passedJournal 1976, p. 705 ↗
  • An ordinance correcting clerical errors in the Salary Standardization Ordinance's pay schedules, effective July 1, 1976, was taken up.
    13 Dec 1976outcome not readJournal 1976, p. 1328 ↗
  • Pay rules for miscellaneous city workers; outcome not shown here.
    21 Mar 1977continuedJournal 1977, p. 235 ↗
  • An ordinance amending the 1977-78 Salary Standardization Ordinance, No. 115-77, is considered for final passage.
    11 Jul 1977outcome not readPrinted page 1977, p. 677 ↗
  • An amendment to the Salary Standardization Ordinance is before the Board; its outcome continues on the next page.
    17 Oct 1977outcome not readPrinted page 1977, p. 998 ↗
  • Painters to get two coveralls weekly plus extra hourly pay
    23 Mar 1978passedJournal 1978, p. 332 ↗
  • Ordinance amending the Salary Standardization Ordinance to allow flex-time passed for second reading.
    21 Jan 1980passed first readingJournal 1980, p. 83 ↗
  • Supervisor Horanzy moved that the Mayor be asked to relinquish four of her ten days to act on the Salary Standardization Ordinance; carried.
    3 Mar 1980passedJournal 1980, p. 249 ↗
  • Airport maintenance employees' work schedules were changed by amending the Salary Standardization Ordinance, and the ordinance was finally passed.
    18 Mar 1980passedJournal 1980, p. 284 ↗
  • Board passed the Salary Standardization Ordinance setting miscellaneous city employee pay schedules effective July 1, 1980, by seven to three.
    31 Mar 1980passedJournal 1980, p. 340 ↗
  • Proposed ordinance changing [name withheld] in the 1982-83 Salary Standardization Ordinance was referred to the Civil Service committee.
    7 Sep 1982referredJournal 1982 ↗
  • Ordinance correcting a clerical error in holiday compensation under the 1982-83 Salary Standardization Ordinance passed for second reading.
    20 Sep 1982passed first readingJournal 1982 ↗
  • Registered nurse classifications designated as not eligible for overtime under the 1982-83 Salary Standardization Ordinance, finally passed.
    27 Sep 1982passedJournal 1982 ↗
  • Premium pay for city laborers under the miscellaneous employees section of the 1982-83 Salary Standardization Ordinance was amended, finally passed.
    27 Sep 1982passedJournal 1982 ↗
  • A clerical error in certification premiums in the 1982-83 Salary Standardization Ordinance was corrected, finally passed.
    27 Sep 1982passedJournal 1982 ↗
  • Recreation and Park Department staff pay adjusted retroactively to July 1, 1982, under the Salary Standardization Ordinance.
    23 Jan 1984passedJournal 1984 ↗
  • Criteria for certifying legislative aides as Administrative Assistants under the Salary Standardization Ordinance were approved.
    10 Jun 1985passedJournal 1985 ↗
  • The Salary Standardization Ordinance setting pay schedules for city, college and school district employees was continued.
  • Salary Standardization Ordinance setting pay schedules for city, community college and school employees passed for second reading as amended.
    25 Mar 1988passed first readingJournal 1988, p. 404 ↗
  • Supervisor Maher asked to remove an employee pay-interest provision from the Salary Standardization Ordinance; sent to Finance Committee.
    28 Mar 1988referredJournal 1988, p. 399 ↗
  • The salary standardization ordinance setting pay schedules for city employees was continued to 4:00 p.m. the same day.
    29 Mar 1988continuedJournal 1988, p. 411 ↗
  • Salary standardization ordinance for city, community college and school district employees was continued without decision.
    31 Mar 1988continuedJournal 1988, p. 416 ↗
  • Amendment to the Salary Standardization Ordinance on employee holidays and pay schedules referred to Governmental Operations Committee.
    5 Dec 1988referredJournal 1988, p. 1449 ↗
  • A proposed ordinance correcting city pay schedules in the fiscal 1989-90 Salary Standardization Ordinance was referred to committee.
    12 Jun 1989referredJournal 1989 ↗
  • Board passed on first reading an ordinance correcting pay schedules and clerical errors in the 1989-90 Salary Standardization Ordinance.
    19 Jun 1989passed first readingJournal 1989 ↗
  • Ordinance correcting city employee pay schedules in Salary Standardization Ordinance 141-89 was finally passed as Ordinance 256-89.
    26 Jun 1989passedJournal 1989 ↗
  • Ordinance proposed to correct and adjust pay equity rates in the city's 1989-90 Salary Standardization Ordinance.
    30 Oct 1989outcome not readJournal 1989, p. 1069 ↗
  • Board extended to April 23 the second-reading date and to April 30, 1990 the final adoption date for the Salary Standardization Ordinance.
    19 Mar 1990passedJournal 1990, p. 305 ↗
  • Motion extended the deadlines to April 23 and April 30, 1990 for passing the Salary Standardization Ordinance for city employees.
    19 Mar 1990passedJournal 1990, p. 306 ↗
  • Motion to treat the Salary Standardization Ordinance as passed April 16 was adopted; final vote not shown.
    2 May 1990outcome not readJournal 1990, p. 455 ↗
  • Consideration of the annual salary standardization ordinance for city, college and school employees was continued to April 15, 1991.
    18 Mar 1991continuedJournal 1991 ↗
  • Board passed the Salary Standardization Ordinance for second reading as amended, setting city employees' pay schedules effective July 1, 1991.
    22 Apr 1991passed first readingJournal 1991 ↗
  • The Mayor vetoed the Salary Standardization Ordinance, a $72 million city worker pay raise, citing a budget shortfall.
    13 May 1991vetoedJournal 1991 ↗
  • Committee extended the deadlines for second reading and final adoption of the Salary Standardization Ordinance to April 20 and April 27, 1992.
    23 Mar 1992passedJournal 1992 ↗
  • The Board continued the annual Salary Standardization Ordinance for city, community college and school employees to April 20, 1992.
    23 Mar 1992continuedJournal 1992 ↗
  • Motion extending deadlines for the Salary Standardization Ordinance to April 19 and April 26, 1993 was referred to the Board.
    8 Mar 1993referredJournal 1993 ↗
  • Motion extends the deadlines to April 19 and April 26, 1993 for the Salary Standardization Ordinance covering city, college and school employees.
    15 Mar 1993outcome not readJournal 1993 ↗
  • Mayor Jordan vetoed the Salary Standardization Ordinance, and the Board held it until its next meeting under Rule 2.9a.
    3 May 1993continuedJournal 1993 ↗
  • Salary standardization ordinance setting pay schedules for city, community college and school employees was tabled.
    26 May 1993tabledJournal 1993 ↗
  • Mayor returned the Salary Standardization Ordinance with his veto; the Board's consideration of it was continued.
    16 Aug 1993outcome not readJournal 1993 ↗
  • Deadlines for the Salary Standardization Ordinance moved to April 4 for second reading and April 11 for adoption.
    21 Mar 1994passedJournal 1994 ↗
  • Motion to extend the deadlines for the 1994-95 Salary Standardization Ordinance was tabled by the Board.
    4 Apr 1994tabledJournal 1994 ↗
  • The Mayor vetoed the Salary Standardization Ordinance for fiscal 1994-95, arguing city employee pay exceeds Bay Area wages.
    25 Apr 1994vetoedJournal 1994 ↗