Organisation · firm
Buckingham & Hecht
An organisation in 26 Board decisions, 1913–1931.
26Board decisions about it
1913–1931first and last decision
In short
- 5 Jun 1913Supply contracts for city institutions and departments for fiscal 1913-1914 proposed for award to named firms.
- 14 Feb 1922City pays for Hetch Hetchy tunnels and school plumbing
- 10 Nov 1924Dry goods and wearing apparel contracts awarded to eleven lowest bidders on bids submitted October 27, 1924.
- 7 Feb 1927City contracts for dry goods and wearing apparel were awarded to fourteen firms on lowest bids, with no bonds required.
- 11 Mar 1929Contracts for furnishing dry goods and wearing apparel were awarded to fifteen bidders on their February 1929 bids.
Who appears together
Lines show who appears in the same decisions. It doesn't mean they made a deal.
People
- Adolf Koshlandproposed 1 · 1913
Organisations
- Walton N. Moore Dry Goods Companynamed in 15
- Levi Strauss & Companynamed in 14
- D. N. & E. Walter & Companynamed in 11
Left out: Recorder Printing and Publishing Company, paid to print the Board's legal notices, not a party.
More from the records
Who was paid · 19 organisations
| Associated Oil Company | 1 decision |
| Spring Valley Water Company | 1 decision |
| Standard Oil Company | 1 decision |
| Union Oil Company of California | 1 decision |
| San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals | 1 decision |
| Shell Company of California | 1 decision |
How many decisions pay each one; amounts are not shown until a person checks them.
Votes · 19 roll calls
yes 270no 0absent 54
19 printed roll calls; 19 were unanimous.
Decisions, by type
| contract | 10 |
| resolution | 8 |
| claim | 8 |
Decisions, by outcome
| passed | 12 |
14 decisions have no outcome read yet.
All 26 decisions · in date order
- Supply contracts for city institutions and departments for fiscal 1913-1914 proposed for award to named firms.
- Resolution proposes awarding contracts for supplies to city institutions and departments; outcome continues on next page.
- City pays for Hetch Hetchy tunnels and school plumbing
- Resolution proposes awarding dry goods and wearing apparel contracts to several firms on their June 30, 1924 bids.
- Dry goods and wearing apparel contracts awarded to eleven lowest bidders on bids submitted October 27, 1924.
- Resolution proposed awarding dry goods and clothing supply contracts to five suppliers, including Buckingham & Hecht and J. B. Crowley.
- Several firms were named for city contracts supplying cheesecloth, batting, gowns and other dry goods and wearing apparel. linked by the name only, not checked
- Supervisor Badaracco proposed awarding the dry goods and wearing apparel contract on bids submitted February 8, 1926.
- Dry goods and wearing apparel contracts for public institutions are awarded to thirteen named suppliers on lowest-bid basis.
- City contracts for dry goods and wearing apparel were awarded to fourteen firms on lowest bids, with no bonds required.
- The Board awarded city contracts for dry goods and wearing apparel to twelve named firms on lowest bids.
- Dry goods and wearing apparel contracts were awarded to listed bidders under bids submitted June 18, 1928; vote is on the next page.
Pages that mention it
Printed pages of the decisions on this page.
Journal 1913
Journal 1925
Journal 1928
Journal 1930