Qipudata
San Francisco · v0.7.1

All decisions

about 130 Board decisions about Construction Company of Nor…, in date order. Each links to its printed page.

  • A resolution proposed setting aside $2,719,000 of water bonds to pay for Hetch Hetchy tunnel Contract 77-C; passed for printing. linked by the name only, not checked
    3 May 1920passed first readingJournal 1920, p. 352 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America offered to buy $3,052,000 of 1910 Hetch Hetchy water bonds at par.
    3 May 1920outcome not readJournal 1920 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's offer accepted to buy $8 million in water bonds funding Hetch Hetchy aqueduct tunnel work.
    3 May 1920passedJournal 1920, p. 351 ↗
  • $276,776.40 was appropriated as the first advance payment to Construction Company of North America for Hetch Hetchy water work. linked by the name only, not checked
    11 May 1920passedJournal 1920, p. 389 ↗
  • Resolution authorizing many city claim payments, including Pacific Gas & Electric street lighting, which was laid over one week.
    25 Oct 1920continuedJournal 1920, p. 888 ↗
  • Board authorized payment of Hetch Hetchy aqueduct progress claims to Construction Company of North America and William Cramp & Sons.
    1 Nov 1920outcome not readJournal 1920, p. 905 ↗
  • United States Steel Products Co. paid $8,623.73 for Hetch Hetchy rails
    9 Nov 1920outcome not readJournal 1920, p. 920 ↗
  • $7,000 set aside to furnish the new Harrison Street School linked by the name only, not checked
    20 Dec 1920outcome not readJournal 1920, p. 1006 ↗
  • Pacific Gas & Electric to be paid $31,849.86 for railway power
    28 Dec 1920passedJournal 1920 ↗
  • Board passed for printing payment authorizations to many claimants, mostly for Hetch Hetchy supplies, schools and San Francisco Hospital.
    31 Jan 1921passed first readingJournal 1921, p. 94 ↗
  • $5,493 paid for a White auto for Hetch Hetchy linked by the name only, not checked
    7 Feb 1921outcome not readJournal 1921, p. 102 ↗
  • City bonds pulled from sale, except Hetch Hetchy water bonds linked by the name only, not checked
    14 Mar 1921passedJournal 1921, p. 178 ↗
  • A resolution authorizing expenditure of listed amounts was passed for printing; its amounts are not shown on this page.
    2 May 1921outcome not readJournal 1921, p. 327 ↗
  • Resolution authorizes payments to contractors for school, Auditorium and Hetch Hetchy work; the final vote is not printed here.
    9 May 1921outcome not readJournal 1921, p. 342 ↗
  • Bids for city water bonds were to be opened at 3 p.m. on August 1, 1921.
    1 Aug 1921outcome not readJournal 1921, p. 662 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's bid to buy $13.3M of Water Bonds was accepted with a $100,000 deposit.
    1 Aug 1921passedJournal 1921, p. 665 ↗
  • Finance Committee recommended approving the sale of $13,306,000 Water Bonds to Construction Company of North America.
    1 Aug 1921outcome not readJournal 1921, p. 664 ↗
  • Proposed $230,000 advance payment to Construction Company of North America under the Hetch Hetchy contract. linked by the name only, not checked
    8 Aug 1921outcome not readJournal 1921, p. 685 ↗
  • The Board passed a $230,000 advance payment to Construction Company of North America for Hetch Hetchy water construction work.
    15 Aug 1921passedJournal 1921, p. 692 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America was granted an extension until February 15, 1922 to exercise its option on $8.5M water bonds. linked by the name only, not checked
    24 Oct 1921passedJournal 1921, p. 921 ↗
  • Resolution authorizing payments for library books, school construction and Hetch Hetchy works was passed for printing.
    14 Nov 1921passed first readingJournal 1921, p. 968 ↗
  • $1,804.90 paid for desks at the Jefferson and Galileo schools
    21 Nov 1921outcome not readJournal 1921, p. 980 ↗
  • City pays for Hetch Hetchy tunnels and school plumbing
    14 Feb 1922passedJournal 1922 ↗
  • Board finally passed a resolution authorizing sixteen payments to contractors, suppliers and payees, including Hetch Hetchy and Municipal Railway work.
    14 Feb 1922passedJournal 1922 ↗
  • Payments authorised to contractors and a claimant for Hetch Hetchy water works, Point Lobos avenue paving, and Horace Mann School architecture. linked by the name only, not checked
    15 May 1922passedJournal 1922 ↗
  • Resolution authorizing about thirty city payments for water, sewer, street and railway work, passed for printing.
    7 Aug 1922passed first readingJournal 1922 ↗
  • The Board authorises dozens of payments to contractors and suppliers for Hetch Hetchy, Municipal Railway, schools, fire houses and pensions.
    13 Nov 1922outcome not readJournal 1922 ↗
  • Water Construction Fund payments to contractors and suppliers for Hetch Hetchy works were passed for printing.
    13 Nov 1922passed first readingJournal 1922 ↗
  • Board authorized payments to Hetch Hetchy aqueduct and dam contractors and suppliers, led by Utah Construction Co.'s $237,501.02.
    20 Nov 1922outcome not readJournal 1922 ↗
  • Hynes proposed rescinding the City's contract giving Construction Company of North America an option on $5,281,000 Hetch Hetchy bonds; referred to Finance Committee.
    2 Jan 1923referredJournal 1923, p. 14 ↗
  • The Board extended Construction Company of North America's option to buy $8,520,000 Hetch Hetchy water bonds until February 15, 1922.
    15 Jan 1923passedJournal 1923, p. 37 ↗
  • Water bond sale to Construction Company of North America cancelled
    19 Mar 1923passedJournal 1923, p. 257 ↗
  • Resolution asks Board of Public Works to report on Hetch Hetchy tunnel costs under contract with Construction Company of North America.
    5 Nov 1923outcome not readJournal 1923, p. 1191 ↗
  • City Attorney advised on the guarantee of the Construction Company of North America under Hetch Hetchy tunnel Contract 77-C. linked by the name only, not checked
    26 Nov 1923outcome not readJournal 1923 ↗
  • Supervisor McSheehy proposed asking city departments to account for losses on the Hetch Hetchy Contract 77-C aqueduct work. linked by the name only, not checked
    29 Dec 1924outcome not readJournal 1924, p. 1549 ↗
  • Consideration of the Construction Company of North America's bridge franchise and toll application was continued to March 8, 1926.
    15 Feb 1926continuedJournal 1926 ↗
  • Hearing on Construction Company of North America's Bay Bridge franchise application was continued to April 26, 1926.
    5 Apr 1926continuedJournal 1926, p. 504 ↗
  • Application by Construction Company of North America for a toll bridge franchise was continued to June 21, 1926.
    26 Apr 1926continuedJournal 1926, p. 618 ↗
  • Board continued hearings on bay bridge applications, with City Attorney to give an opinion in one week.
    10 May 1926continuedJournal 1926 ↗
  • The Construction Company of North America's application for a toll bridge franchise was continued to June 28, 1926.
    21 Jun 1926continuedJournal 1926, p. 1046 ↗
  • Hearing on the Construction Company of North America's proposed toll bridge franchise was continued to July 6, 1926.
    28 Jun 1926continuedJournal 1926, p. 1088 ↗
  • Hearing on the Construction Company of North America's toll bridge franchise continued to July 12.
    6 Jul 1926continuedJournal 1926, p. 1139 ↗
  • Hearing on the Construction Company of North America's toll bridge franchise application continued to July 19, 1926.
    12 Jul 1926continuedJournal 1926, p. 1180 ↗
  • Hearing on the Construction Company of North America's toll bridge franchise application was continued to August 10, 1926.
    19 Jul 1926continuedJournal 1926, p. 1201 ↗
  • Board continued two applications by the Construction Company of North America for a toll bridge franchise to November 8, 1926.
    1 Nov 1926continuedJournal 1926, p. 1709 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's toll bridge franchise application, Rincon Hill to Alameda County, was continued to November 15, 1926. linked by the name only, not checked
    8 Nov 1926continuedJournal 1926, p. 1745 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America applied for a toll-bridge franchise from Rincon Hill across the Bay. linked by the name only, not checked
    15 Nov 1926outcome not readJournal 1926, p. 1783 ↗
  • Supervisors postponed the Construction Company of North America's applications for a toll bridge from San Francisco to Alameda County until December 6, 1926.
    22 Nov 1926continuedJournal 1926, p. 1798 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's proposed toll bridge from Rincon Hill to Alameda County was continued to December 20, 1926. linked by the name only, not checked
    6 Dec 1926continuedJournal 1926, p. 1880 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's two Bay toll bridge franchise applications were left pending on this page. linked by the name only, not checked
    20 Dec 1926outcome not readJournal 1926, p. 1999 ↗
  • Toll bridge franchise applications by Construction Company of North America were continued to January 10, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    27 Dec 1926continuedJournal 1926, p. 2027 ↗
  • Consideration of the Construction Company of North America's two proposed toll bridge franchises from Rincon Hill to Alameda County was continued to January 17, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    10 Jan 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 28 ↗
  • The Construction Company of North America's two toll bridge applications from San Francisco to Alameda County were put off until that afternoon. linked by the name only, not checked
    17 Jan 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 99 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America applied for two franchises to build a toll bridge between San Francisco and Alameda County.
    17 Jan 1927outcome not readJournal 1927, p. 111 ↗
  • Consideration of the Construction Company of North America's two toll bridge applications was continued to February 8, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    31 Jan 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 212 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's bridge plans put off linked by the name only, not checked
    7 Mar 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 343 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's two applications for a Rincon Hill to Alameda County toll bridge were continued to March 14, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    7 Mar 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 402 ↗
  • The Construction Company of North America's two toll bridge applications, from Rincon Hill to Alameda County, were continued to March 21, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    14 Mar 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 439 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's two Rincon Hill toll bridge applications were continued; the vote continues on the next page. linked by the name only, not checked
    21 Mar 1927outcome not readJournal 1927, p. 474 ↗
  • Two toll bridge franchise applications by the Construction Company of North America were continued to May 9, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    28 Mar 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 524 ↗
  • Two toll bridge franchise applications by Construction Company of North America are proposed, with the outcome continuing on the next page. linked by the name only, not checked
    9 May 1927outcome not readJournal 1927, p. 796 ↗
  • Two Construction Company of North America applications for a San Francisco to Alameda toll bridge were continued to July 25, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    23 May 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 949 ↗
  • Bay bridge from Rincon Hill to Alameda voted down
    20 Jun 1927rejectedJournal 1927, p. 1224 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's two applications for a toll bridge franchise from Rincon Hill to Alameda were continued to August 1, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    25 Jul 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 1403 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's modified toll bridge plan was continued to August 1, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    25 Jul 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 1408 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America applied to build a 4.5-mile toll bridge from Rincon Hill to Oakland; outcome not yet recorded. linked by the name only, not checked
    25 Jul 1927outcome not readJournal 1927, p. 1408 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's modified toll bridge plan, ending at Rincon Hill, was continued to August 8, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    1 Aug 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 1463 ↗
  • Further consideration of the Construction Company of North America's proposed bay bridge from Rincon Hill to Oakland was continued to August 8, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    1 Aug 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 1464 ↗
  • Board continued the Construction Company of North America's two toll bridge franchise applications until August 8, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    1 Aug 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 1460 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's proposed toll bridge from Rincon Hill to Oakland was continued to August 22, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    8 Aug 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 1504 ↗
  • The Construction Company of North America's two toll bridge franchise applications, from Rincon Hill to Alameda County, were continued to August 22, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    8 Aug 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 1500 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's modified toll bridge plan with a Rincon Hill terminal was continued until August 22, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    8 Aug 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 1503 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's modified bridge plan, with its west end on Rincon Hill, was continued to September 19, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    22 Aug 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 1579 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America applied for a toll bridge franchise from Rincon Hill to Alameda County; outcome continues on the next page. linked by the name only, not checked
    22 Aug 1927outcome not readJournal 1927, p. 1575 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's toll bridge application from Rincon Hill to Oakland was put off until September 19, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    22 Aug 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 1580 ↗
  • Two applications by the Construction Company of North America for a toll bridge franchise await a decision on the next page. linked by the name only, not checked
    19 Sep 1927outcome not readJournal 1927, p. 1785 ↗
  • The Board continued Frank E. Webb's application for a San Francisco Bay toll bridge from Hunter's Point to Alameda until September 26, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    19 Sep 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 1789 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's bay bridge application from Rincon Hill to Oakland was continued to September 26, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    19 Sep 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 1790 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's revised bridge plan, ending on Rincon Hill, was continued to October 3, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    26 Sep 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 1838 ↗
  • Two toll bridge franchise applications by Construction Company of North America continued to October 3, 1927.
    26 Sep 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 1834 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's application for a toll bridge across San Francisco Bay was continued to October 3, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    26 Sep 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 1840 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's bay bridge franchise application was continued to October 10, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    3 Oct 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 1903 ↗
  • The Construction Company of North America applied for two franchises to build a toll bridge from Rincon Hill to Alameda County. linked by the name only, not checked
    3 Oct 1927outcome not readJournal 1927, p. 1898 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's modified bridge plan with a Rincon Hill terminal was continued to October 17, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    10 Oct 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 1965 ↗
  • Two applications by the Construction Company of North America for a toll bridge from Rincon Hill to Alameda were continued to October 17, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    10 Oct 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 1961 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America applied to build a toll bridge from Rincon Hill across San Francisco Bay; outcome continues on next page. linked by the name only, not checked
    10 Oct 1927outcome not readJournal 1927, p. 1965 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's modified toll bridge plan, with a Rincon Hill terminal, was continued to October 24, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    17 Oct 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 1994 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's two applications for a bay toll bridge franchise from Rincon Hill await a decision. linked by the name only, not checked
    17 Oct 1927outcome not readJournal 1927, p. 1990 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's toll bridge application from Rincon Hill to Oakland was continued to October 24, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    17 Oct 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 1995 ↗
  • The Construction Company of North America's two toll bridge franchise applications, from Rincon Hill to Alameda County, were continued to October 31, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    24 Oct 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 2051 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's application for a toll bridge from Rincon Hill to Oakland was continued to October 31, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    24 Oct 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 2055 ↗
  • The Construction Company of North America's two bay toll bridge franchise applications were continued to November 21, 1927. linked by the name only, not checked
    31 Oct 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 2102 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's supplemental bridge plans, with a modified Rincon Hill terminal, were continued to November 21, 1927.
    31 Oct 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 2106 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America applied to build and operate a toll bridge across San Francisco Bay. linked by the name only, not checked
    31 Oct 1927outcome not readJournal 1927, p. 2106 ↗
  • Board continued the Construction Company of North America's toll bridge application from Rincon Hill to Oakland until January 23, 1928.
    21 Nov 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 2211 ↗
  • Supervisors continued the Construction Company of North America's two toll bridge franchise applications to January 23, 1928. linked by the name only, not checked
    21 Nov 1927continuedJournal 1927, p. 2207 ↗
  • The Construction Company of North America's two applications for a toll bridge franchise were continued to February 6, 1928. linked by the name only, not checked
    23 Jan 1928continuedJournal 1928, p. 146 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's supplemental bridge plans were continued to February 6, 1928. linked by the name only, not checked
    23 Jan 1928continuedJournal 1928, p. 149 ↗
  • The Board continued the Construction Company of North America's proposed toll bridge application from Rincon Hill to Oakland until February 6, 1928. linked by the name only, not checked
    23 Jan 1928continuedJournal 1928, p. 150 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's toll bridge application from Rincon Hill to Oakland was continued to April 2, 1928. linked by the name only, not checked
    6 Feb 1928continuedJournal 1928, p. 240 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's two toll bridge franchise applications, from Rincon Hill to Alameda County, were considered and continued. linked by the name only, not checked
    6 Feb 1928outcome not readJournal 1928, p. 235 ↗
  • The Construction Company of North America's two toll bridge applications, Rincon Hill to Alameda County, were continued to April 16, 1928. linked by the name only, not checked
    2 Apr 1928continuedJournal 1928, p. 584 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's application for a San Francisco Bay toll bridge to Oakland was continued to April 16, 1928. linked by the name only, not checked
    2 Apr 1928continuedJournal 1928, p. 589 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's revised bridge plan, ending at Rincon Hill, was continued to April 16, 1928. linked by the name only, not checked
    2 Apr 1928continuedJournal 1928, p. 588 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's application for a San Francisco Bay toll bridge to Oakland was continued to April 16, 1928. linked by the name only, not checked
    2 Apr 1928continuedJournal 1928, p. 591 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's revised bridge plans, ending on Rincon Hill, were continued to April 16, 1928. linked by the name only, not checked
    2 Apr 1928continuedJournal 1928, p. 590 ↗
  • The Construction Company of North America's two applications for a toll bridge to Alameda County were continued to May 14, 1928. linked by the name only, not checked
    16 Apr 1928continuedJournal 1928, p. 694 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's modified bridge plan, ending at Rincon Hill, was continued to May 14, 1928. linked by the name only, not checked
    16 Apr 1928continuedJournal 1928, p. 697 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's toll bridge application from Rincon Hill to Oakland was continued to May 14, 1928. linked by the name only, not checked
    16 Apr 1928continuedJournal 1928, p. 698 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America applied for two toll bridge franchises from San Francisco to Alameda County; outcome continues on next page. linked by the name only, not checked
    14 May 1928outcome not readJournal 1928, p. 812 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's modified bridge plan, with a Rincon Hill terminal, was continued to May 28, 1928. linked by the name only, not checked
    14 May 1928continuedJournal 1928, p. 816 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's application for a bay toll bridge was continued to May 28, 1928. linked by the name only, not checked
    14 May 1928continuedJournal 1928, p. 817 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's modified bridge route ending on Rincon Hill was continued to June 25, 1928.
    28 May 1928continuedJournal 1928, p. 1090 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's bay toll bridge application from Rincon Hill to Oakland was continued to June 25, 1928. linked by the name only, not checked
    28 May 1928continuedJournal 1928, p. 1091 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America applied to erect, maintain and operate a toll bridge; the outcome continues on the next page. linked by the name only, not checked
    25 Jun 1928outcome not readJournal 1928, p. 1353 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America submitted modified plans for a bridge whose western terminal is on Rincon Hill. linked by the name only, not checked
    25 Jun 1928outcome not readJournal 1928, p. 1352 ↗
  • Consideration of Construction Company of North America's two toll bridge franchise applications was continued to July 9, 1928.
    25 Jun 1928continuedJournal 1928, p. 1349 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's toll bridge application from Rincon Hill to Oakland was continued to July 31, 1928. linked by the name only, not checked
    9 Jul 1928continuedJournal 1928, p. 1438 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's revised bridge plan, ending at Rincon Hill, was continued to July 31, 1928. linked by the name only, not checked
    9 Jul 1928continuedJournal 1928, p. 1436 ↗
  • Construction Company of North America's two toll bridge franchise applications were continued to July 31, 1928. linked by the name only, not checked
    9 Jul 1928continuedJournal 1928, p. 1431 ↗
  • The Construction Company of North America's application to build and operate a toll bridge over San Francisco Bay was denied.
    31 Jul 1928passedJournal 1928 ↗
  • Bay bridge franchise application by The Construction Company of North America was denied for a route between San Francisco and Alameda County.
    31 Jul 1928passedJournal 1928 ↗
  • The Construction Company of North America's two applications for a toll bridge franchise to Alameda County were denied.
    31 Jul 1928refusedJournal 1928 ↗
  • The Construction Company of North America filed an amended application for a franchise; the Board's decision is not yet recorded.
    31 Jul 1928outcome not readJournal 1928 ↗
  • Appropriates $50,000 from the 1910 Hetch Hetchy Bond Fund to pay Construction Company of North America in full.
  • The City Attorney was directed to settle Construction Company of North America's Hetch Hetchy tunnel claim for $50,000. linked by the name only, not checked
  • Construction Company of North America takes $50,000 for Hetch Hetchy tunnels
    15 Sep 1930outcome not readJournal 1930, p. 2142 ↗