Organisation · government body
Ethics Commission
A government body in 12 Board decisions, 1997–2011.
12Board decisions about it
1997–2011first and last decision
In short
- 29 Mar 2011Five people appointed to veterans commission.
Who appears together
People
- John Avalosproposed 1 · 2011
More from the records
Votes · 8 roll calls
yes 68no 23absent 5
8 printed roll calls; 4 were unanimous.
Decisions, by type
| ordinance | 11 |
| other | 1 |
Decisions, by outcome
| passed | 5 |
| referred | 3 |
| passed first reading | 3 |
1 decision has no outcome read yet.
All 12 decisions · in date order
- Ordinance appropriating $17,190 to the Ethics Commission to expand Proposition 208 work; referred to Finance Committee.
- Proposed $82,448 appropriation for 1.41 new Ethics Commission positions was referred to the Finance Committee.
- Ethics Commission received $73,306 for 1.41 new positions in 1997-98, passed as Ordinance 69-98.
- The 1998-1999 city budget was adopted after the Board rejected amendments for a People's Budget and $40,000 for Ethics Commission reporting.
- Proposed $38,346 appropriation for one Ethics Commission investigator position was sent to the Finance Committee.
- Ordinance to re-appropriate $34,947 for one Ethics Commission investigator position passed on first reading.
- Ethics Commission would receive $34,947 to fund one investigator position; passed on first reading.
- Ordinance moves $34,947 of Proposition O funds to pay one Ethics Commission investigator; finally passed.
- Ethics Commission gets $1.3 million from city reserve for campaign funding
- $1.3 million reserve money to go to public campaign fund.
- Five people appointed to veterans commission.
- $1.3 million added to public campaign finance fund
Pages that mention it
Printed pages of the decisions on this page.
Journal 1997
Journal 1998
Board minutes 2001
Board minutes 2011