All decisions
about 550 Board decisions about San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge, in date order. Each links to its printed page.
- Mayor's office forwarded M. K. Miller's letter opposing James Oliver's bay bridge franchise, referred to committees.
- The War Department will hold a public hearing on trans-bay bridges on December 11, 1925; the matter was referred to committee.
- Hearing on the Construction Company of North America's Bay Bridge franchise application was continued to April 26, 1926.
- Board continued hearings on bay bridge applications, with City Attorney to give an opinion in one week.
- Edward Bertram to ask for a San Francisco Bay bridge franchise
- Edward Bertram to ask for a San Francisco Bay bridge franchise
- Edward Bertram to ask for a San Francisco Bay bridge franchise
- Proof that notice of E. A. Bertram's double-deck Bay bridge application was published six times; referred to committee.
- Proof that notices of A. O. Stewart's proposed Bay bridge franchise were posted in three city locations; referred to committee.
- R. Lee Dunn's application for a Bay bridge franchise was continued to July 6, 1926.
- Inter-Cities Bridge Company applied for authority to build and charge tolls on a bay bridge from San Francisco to Alameda County.
- Hearing on the Inter-Cities Bridge Co.'s bay bridge franchise application was continued to August 10, 1926.
- Board authorizes its Special Bridge Committee to hire three independent bridge engineers to study a San Francisco Bay bridge.
- Board approved sending a three-member committee to Washington to learn War Department requirements for a Bay bridge.
- Supervisor McSheehy proposed a city-controlled bay bridge policy, which was referred to the Special Bridge Committee.
- Supervisor Shannon's resolution to condemn Mission Rock for the bay bridge pier was referred to the Special Bridge Committee.
- Board asked Public Works to study transbay bridge locations and designs and appropriated $50,000 for preliminary engineering studies.
- Supervisor Hayden's proposed resolution asks the Board of Public Works to study a Bay bridge from San Francisco to Alameda; referred to committee.
- New York and San Francisco Development Company's Bay bridge franchise application was continued to December 27, 1926.
- Supervisor Gallagher moved that a vote on San Francisco Bay bridge franchises be set for January 17, 1927; referred to committee.
- Shannon proposed Mission Rock as the San Francisco starting point for a transbay bridge; referred to Special Bridge Committee.
- Robert E. Fitzgerald applied for a franchise to build and charge tolls on a bay bridge from The Embarcadero to Oakland.
- Transbay bridge site and plan decision deferred until the adjourned hearing on January 31, 1927.
- Civic League urged action on transbay bridge franchise applications, warning that stalled applications could lapse.
- The Civic League of Improvements Clubs raised concerns about pending transbay bridge franchise applications; the matter was held over one week.
- Supervisor Gallagher moved to file the Bridge Committee's pending report on a San Francisco Bay bridge.
- Robert E. Fitzgerald applied for a franchise to build and charge tolls on a bay bridge from The Embarcadero to Oakland.
- Victor Knutson's transbay bridge and union railway terminal plan was sent back to committee for review.
- The Special Bridge Committee proposes private construction of the Bay Bridge under a city franchise, with public ownership later; outcome continues.
- Supervisor Havenner moved that the Legislative Committee report on bridge legislation affecting the proposed bay bridge; so ordered.
- Supervisor McSheehy proposed declaring Rincon Hill and Alameda sites the best terminals for a transbay bridge; action was continued one week.
- The appointment of engineers for a transbay bridge was laid over one week after Stanford's committee could not report in time.
- Board's resolution naming the Rincon Hill to Sixteenth Street area as a transbay bridge terminal failed on February 10, 1927.
- Supervisor Havenner proposed forming a San Francisco and Alameda bridge district to finance and build a public bay bridge.
- Supervisor Roncovieri proposed an expert financial study of public versus private bay bridge options; item continued.
- Board continued for one week a proposal naming Rincon Hill and Sixteenth Street as terminal areas for a transbay bridge.
- The Board favours immediate private construction of the bay bridge, while the City Attorney prepares a public ownership vote.
- Supervisor McSheehy proposed the transbay bridge sites and a high-level bridge; action continued one week.
- Supervisor Havenner proposed forming a Bay bridge district with Alameda County for public ownership of a bridge.
- Board of Public Works is still choosing three engineers to select the transbay bridge site.
- Supervisor Marks moved that the City Attorney submit a form for voters on public or private ownership of the proposed bay bridge.
- Supervisor Havenner proposed forming a bridge district with Alameda County to finance and operate a public Bay bridge.
- Supervisor Shannon proposed the City Attorney start condemnation of Mission Rock to hold it as a public Bay bridge site.
- Supervisor Havenner proposes forming a San Francisco and Alameda bridge district to build a publicly owned Bay bridge; outcome not printed.
- Supervisor Roncovieri proposed that the Bridge Committee hire financial accountants to compare public and private Bay bridge funding.
- Supervisor Gallagher moved that the Board favour immediate private construction of the Bay bridge until voters decide ownership.
- Supervisor McSheehy's resolution proposes Rincon Hill and Oakland-Alameda areas as transbay bridge terminals; outcome not yet printed.
- Board of Public Works recommends appointing three engineers and $30,000 to study a San Francisco to Alameda Bay bridge.
- Supervisor Gallagher moved that the Board favour immediate private construction of the bay bridge until voters decide public ownership.
- Supervisor McSheehy's resolution seeking a War Department ruling on transbay bridge terminals was continued to May 9, 1927.
- Supervisor Havenner proposed forming a bridge district with Alameda County to finance and operate a public Bay bridge.
- Three engineers funded with $25,000 to study the best San Francisco to Alameda Transbay bridge sites; passed 14 to 1.
- Supervisor Havenner proposed an ordinance letting the Board of Public Works hire three engineers to study a Transbay bridge, with $30,000.
- Board of Public Works authorized to hire three engineers to study Transbay bridge sites, costing up to $25,000.
- Four university presidents thanked for naming engineers for the bay bridge
- Shannon proposed Mission Rock as San Francisco's starting point for a transbay bridge to Alameda County.
- Gallagher proposed immediate private construction of the bay bridge while keeping public ownership as policy.
- Pending transbay bridge resolutions and motions were continued until May 23, 1927.
- Supervisor Shannon moved to adopt the engineers' report on the proposed transbay bridge and to send a committee to Washington.
- Supervisor Shannon moved to adopt the engineers' transbay bridge report and send a committee to Washington; Roncovieri offered an amendment.
- Supervisor Shannon moved to adopt the engineers' report on the bay bridge location; the vote is not yet printed.
- The Board adopted engineers' report on a bay bridge and named engineers to present it in Washington.
- A resolution is proposed to send a committee to Washington to seek War Department approval for a transbay bridge.
- Gilmartin Co., Inc. was owed $1,602.50 for printing and maps for the Transbay bridge report.
- Bay bridge from Rincon Hill to Alameda voted down
- Claim of $7,500 paid to James B. McSheehy for committee expenses seeking approval of a San Francisco Bay bridge site.
- Board adopted a resolution authorizing a telegram to President Coolidge urging War Department approval of the bay bridge site.
- Board continued Roy C. Hackley's bay bridge application, filed June 27, 1927, until August 1.
- Motion favouring private construction of a bay bridge until voters decide public ownership was continued to August 1, 1927.
- Havenner proposed a resolution urging public construction and ownership of highway bridges, including a Bay bridge.
- Board asked the City Attorney to seek a federal bill allowing a transbay bridge from Rincon Hill to Alameda Mole.
- City Attorney asked to submit a ballot form on public or private ownership of the proposed bay bridge; ordered.
- Further consideration of the Construction Company of North America's proposed bay bridge from Rincon Hill to Oakland was continued to August 8, 1927.
- Resolution declares intent that the proposed trans-bay bridge be publicly financed, built and operated.
- A claim of $1,846.45 was listed for payment to J. D. Galloway for work before the War Department on the transbay bridge.
- Gallagher moved a bridge hearings motion favouring a publicly owned bay bridge; outcome continues on next page.
- J. D. Galloway was paid $1,846.45 for professional services before the War Department on the Transbay bridge.
- Motions on public or private ownership of the proposed bay bridge were continued to Monday, September 19, 1927.
- Supervisor Gallagher moved favoring private capital for building the bay bridge until voters decide public ownership.
- Roy C. Hackley's toll bridge application from Fremont and Brannan streets to Alameda was continued to September 26, 1927.
- Construction Company of North America's bay bridge application from Rincon Hill to Oakland was continued to September 26, 1927.
- Edward A. Bertram's amended application for an alternative bay bridge line was continued to October 3, 1927.
- Construction Company of North America's bay bridge franchise application was continued to October 10, 1927.
- Motion favouring immediate private construction of the bay bridge was continued to October 10, 1927.
- Board continued its debate on public versus private ownership of the proposed bay bridge until October 10, 1927.
- Edward A. Bertram's amended application for an alternative bay bridge line was continued to October 10, 1927.
- Edward A. Bertram's amended alternative bay bridge application was continued to October 17, 1927.
- Consideration of motions on public or private ownership of a San Francisco bay bridge was continued to October 17, 1927.
- Gallagher proposed a telegram asking the Secretary of War to explain his authority over a San Francisco bay bridge.
- Bridge Committee directed to study the Panama Pacific Exposition company's plan for financing a bay bridge.
- War Department letter says plans for a San Francisco Bay bridge north of the Hunters Point-Alameda line will not be approved.
- City Attorney was asked to draft a bay bridge bill for Congress, approved nine votes to one.
- Motions on public versus private ownership of a Bay bridge were postponed until October 24, 1927.
- Motions on bay bridge ownership, favouring private construction, were continued to October 31, 1927.
- Colonel Rand protested further Board consideration of H. S. Henion's bay bridge franchise application across the Oakland Estuary; the application remains pending.
- Supervisor Gallagher moved that the Board favour immediate private construction of a publicly owned bay bridge; continued to November 21, 1927.
- Allan C. Rush's amended application for a trans-bay bridge from Rincon Hill to Goat Island was continued to November 21, 1927.
- Hearing on a proposed Bay bridge from Rincon Hill to Goat Island was continued to November 21, 1927.
- Gallagher proposes immediate private construction of the bay bridge until voters choose public ownership; Marks offers an amendment.
- Supervisor McSheehy is proposed to be sent to Washington to press Congress on a transbay bridge bill, with $5,000 for expenses.
- The City Attorney recommended a resolution asking Congress to pass a bill permitting a transbay bridge from Rincon Hill.
- Board authorised Supervisor McSheehy to take a transbay bridge bill to Congress in Washington, with $5,000 for expenses.
- Inter-Cities Bridge Company offered an alternative bay bridge design on Goat Island; the matter was continued to January 23, 1928.
- Federal Senate Bill 1762 would grant consent for San Francisco to build a bay bridge from Rincon Hill to Alameda County; referred to committee.
- Supervisor Marks's motion asked the City Attorney to submit a public or private bay bridge ownership question to voters; ordered without objection.
- Consideration of the bay bridge ownership motions was continued to April 2, 1928.
- Roy C. Hackley's renewed application for a 19,400-foot bay bridge from Fremont and Brannan streets was continued to April 2, 1928.
- Inter-Cities Bridge Company's alternative bay bridge route from Broadway to Oakland was continued to April 2, 1928.
- Proposed resolution would send Supervisor McSheehy to Washington to lobby Congress for a transbay bridge, with $5,000 for expenses.
- Resolution would send officials to Washington to lobby Congress for a Transbay bridge, appropriating $5,000.
- Board adopted a resolution protesting Navy objections to a San Francisco Bay bridge after a ferry sinking.
- Board authorized a special committee of five to attend the Coyote Point Bay Bridge dedication in San Mateo County.
- Shannon proposed asking the State Engineer to help San Francisco obtain a centrally located Bay bridge franchise.
- Gallagher's motion authorizing the Special Bridge and Public Utilities Committees to protect San Francisco's interest in the trans-bay bridge was carried.
- Resolution No. 27754 declares that any trans-bay bridge should be publicly owned; Supervisor Havenner read it into the record.
- The Board voted to hear all bay bridge franchise applications starting April 2, 1928, until every applicant has presented.
- City Attorney John J. O'Toole authorised to travel to Washington for congressional hearings on the San Francisco Bay Bridge bills.
- Board commended Senator Hiram W. Johnson for helping win federal support for a San Francisco Bay bridge.
- McSheehy, O'Toole and O'Shaughnessy praised for their Bay bridge work
- Motions on public or private ownership of a proposed bay bridge were continued to April 16, 1928 at 2 p.m.
- Board proposed commending Representative Richard J. Welch for helping win federal support for a San Francisco Bay bridge.
- Board commends Matt I. Sullivan for helping win congressional support for a San Francisco Bay bridge.
- Motion to telegraph Supervisor McSheehy about a Bay Bridge tube compromise carried with an amendment; text continues.
- Inter-Cities Bridge Company's alternative bay bridge design from Broadway to Oakland was continued to May 14, 1928.
- Motion on public versus private ownership of the proposed Bay bridge was continued to May 14, 1928.
- Resolution condemning Supervisor McSheehy's tube compromise for a bay bridge was referred to the Mayor and Special Bridge Committee.
- Inter-Cities Bridge Company's alternative bay bridge route from Broadway to Goat Island was continued to May 28, 1928.
- Motions on public or private ownership of the proposed bay bridge were continued to May 28, 1928.
- Roy Hackley's second bay bridge application, filed June 1927, was continued to May 28, 1928.
- Appropriation of $100,000 for Bay Bridge investigations, conditional on a federal permit, proposed, outcome not shown here.
- Invitation proposed to the House Interstate and Foreign Commerce Committee to visit San Francisco and inspect the bay bridge problem.
- City Attorney O'Toole's letter on a congressional inspection of the Bay Bridge project was referred to Supervisor Havenner.
- Supervisor McSheehy's report on a proposed San Francisco Bay bridge plan, continued from May 21, is debated; no decision shown here.
- Supervisor McSheehy's Bridge Committee report recounts his trip to Congress on a transbay bridge bill and is read.
- Congressman Welch urged denying pending private bay bridge applications to show San Francisco backs a public bridge.
- Gallagher presented a plan for a publicly owned Transbay bridge from Rincon Hill; the franchise resolution is still pending.
- H. S. Henion's pending bay bridge franchise application was assigned to Montgomery K. Miller, who will take the franchise.
- Inter-Cities Bridge Company proposed an alternative bay bridge route from Broadway to Oakland via Goat Island.
- Motions on public or private ownership of a proposed bay bridge were continued to July 31, 1928.
- Edward A. Bertram's amended application for an alternative bay bridge line was continued to July 31, 1928.
- Bay bridge franchise application by The Construction Company of North America was denied for a route between San Francisco and Alameda County.
- Supervisor McSheehy was authorized to take a transbay bridge bill to Congress, with $5,000 for his expenses.
- Supervisor Marks proposed a committee of Board members, the Mayor and engineers to handle the Bay bridge matters.
- Shannon's resolution proposes a committee to urge Congress to pass the Johnson-Welch bay bridge bill.
- Resolution 30032 on transferring the Bay Bridge franchise to the State of California was presented; its outcome continues on the next page.
- Board telegraphed Congressman Welch urging action on the Bay Bridge bill linking Rincon Hill and Alameda.
- Resolution proposed to send a committee to Washington to urge passage of the Johnson-Welch bill for a publicly owned Bay Bridge.
- Board agreed to a conference in the Mayor's office on January 23, 1929, with newspaper editors, on the Transbay bridge delegation.
- Mayor to name a citizens' committee for the bay bridge
- Transbay bridge bill sent to New York bond lawyers for review
- A State bill to make the transbay bridge part of the public highway was laid over one week.
- Transbay bridge bills laid over for a special hearing
- Board unanimously approved State Senate Bill 538, making the transbay bridge to Alameda County part of the public highway.
- Board asked Senator Fellom to withhold printing of Senate Bill 700 on the transbay bridge until suggested amendments are made.
- Board took no action on State Senate Bill 702, which would repeal the 1881 law on bay bridge franchises.
- Communication urging a bay bridge franchise hearing for J. P. O'Connell was laid over one week.
- Communication from Paul Fratessa for John O'Connell's transbay bridge franchise was laid over one week.
- Mayor Rolph asks the city to resell Treat Avenue land
- The City Attorney was directed to appeal Judge Goodell's ruling, giving bay bridge applicant J. O'Connell a hearing.
- Supervisor Schmidt moved a $100,000 transfer from Bay Bridge Investigations to a Central Warehouse Construction Fund.
- Board refused to reinstate a hearing on J. P. O'Connell's bay bridge application from Rincon Hill to Alameda.
- Board endorses President Hoover's proposed commission to study a San Francisco Bay bridge and pledges cooperation.
- Proposed $40,000 from the General Fund to the State Department of Public Works for a transbay bridge survey.
- City approved $40,000 from the General Fund for state preliminary surveys and plans for a Transbay bridge to Alameda.
- The Board endorsed the Hoover-Young Bay Bridge Commission's work and urged early action on a permit.
- Public Works asks the Board for $3,000 to plan the transbay bridge; the request was passed for printing.
- Board proposes $5,000 from the General Fund to the California Toll Bridge Authority for surveying the transbay bridge.
- $5,000 to the California Toll Bridge Authority for transbay bridge plans
- Mayor to appoint a supervisors' committee to meet federal officials about the proposed San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.
- Supervisor Havenner moved that the City Engineer urge Congress to back a bay bridge sinking fund change.
- Gallagher moved that the Mayor convene interested parties on the Bay Bridge routes through the South of Market district.
- The Redwood Empire Association's invitation to the Richardson's Bay bridge dedication was accepted, and the Mayor will appoint a committee.
- Cooperation with the Northern California Highways Association on transbay bridge laterals is proposed and the report laid over one week.
- Hearing held on the construction of highway laterals to the proposed Transbay Bridge; outcome not yet shown.
- Supervisor Canepa moved a resolution asking Congress to pass bills funding Bay Bridge construction through the Reconstruction Finance Corporation.
- Supervisor Havenner moved that the Mayor appoint a committee to deal with State and Federal engineers on Bay Bridge approaches.
- Supervisor Gallagher presented a resolution thanking the Bay Bridge financing committee for securing the Reconstruction Finance Corporation bond purchase.
- Havenner moved that the Mayor appoint a citizens committee to honour the Bay Bridge Commission's work; motion carried.
- Copy sought of the loan agreement financing the Bay Bridge
- Board urges the State Legislature to pass Bay Bridge bills before February 1 to secure a $62,000,000 loan.
- Resolution urging state committees to pass bills securing a $62,000,000 Reconstruction Finance Corporation loan for the transbay bridge.
- Resolution asks the Mayor to appoint a committee for ground-breaking ceremonies on the Bay Bridge, a project of about $67 million.
- Board commends business, labor and civic leaders for securing state legislation enabling the Bay Bridge; resolution adopted.
- Names of the Governor and State Toll Bridge Authority members were added to the Bay Bridge commendation resolution.
- Board carried a motion to accept the Governor's invitation to attend Transbay Bridge bid opening in Sacramento.
- The Board asked state and bridge engineers to study traffic links between the Bay Bridge and a proposed Yerba Buena airport.
- Board urged a 1939 World Fair celebrating the Golden Gate and Bay Bridges; the resolution was referred to the Public Welfare Committee.
- The Board recessed to hold a hearing next day on plans for the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge approaches and terminal.
- Map of state highways to Bay Bridge approved
- The Board adopted a resolution asking the Mayor to arrange a citizens' committee to commemorate the Bay Bridge groundbreaking ceremonies.
- Proposed ordinance adding traffic checker positions as needed for Bay Bridge approach traffic surveys was passed for second reading.
- Salary schedule amended to add a Traffic Checker classification for Bay Bridge approach surveys, adopted.
- Board adopted a resolution to buy $390,000 of Bay Bridge toll revenue bonds from city banks, 14 ayes, 1 absent.
- Board referred the Bay Bridge bond repurchase question to the Retirement Board, expecting Retirement Fund purchase.
- Resolution urges a budget provision of $390,000 to buy Bay Bridge revenue bonds over four years.
- The Finance Committee presented a proposed resolution to fund the city's purchase of $650,000 in Trans-Bay Bridge bonds, to be paid from the gas tax.
- Salary schedule amended to add a Traffic Checker classification for Bay Bridge approach traffic surveys, adopted by the Board.
- Annual Salary Ordinance amended to add traffic checker positions for Bay Bridge approach surveys, passed finally.
- Streets Committee recommended Resolution 765 on arterial highway development for expected heavy automobile traffic after the Golden Gate and Bay bridges are built.
- Budget line 35 corrected to read San Francisco Oakland Bay Bridge Approaches instead of Golden Gate Bridge Approaches.
- Resolution 751 proposes appropriating money with State and Federal governments for Bay Bridge preliminary work, seeking Reconstruction Finance Corporation aid.
- Supervisor Power's resolution proposes a World Fair in San Francisco to celebrate the Golden Gate and Bay Bridges; amendment pending.
- Healy-Tibbitts allowed spur tracks on Bryant Street for the Bay Bridge
- Board carried a motion asking the Toll Bridge Authority for a report on Bay Bridge transit conferences.
- Supervisor Uhl proposed registering the Board's opposition to Plan X for the Bay Bridge; the matter was put off to Friday.
- The Public Works Department replied on Bay Bridge approach changes; the communication was referred to the Streets Committee.
- Art Commission objected to Bay Bridge approaches near Fifth and Harrison streets; report referred to Streets and Finance Committee.
- Board postponed action one week on the Bay bridge approach resolution and property purchase for the new alignment.
- Chief Administrative Officer was ordered to study storing city-owned automobiles under the Bay Bridge approaches and report back.
- Art Commission asks that the Bay Bridge ramp be moved
- Art Commission asks that the Bay Bridge ramp be moved
- The city agreed to surrender $390,000 in bonds so the state toll bridge authority would move the Transbay Bridge's western terminus.
- Supervisor Gallagher moved that the Mayor and Public Utilities Commission report on protecting San Francisco's interest in a Bay Bridge interurban terminal.
- Mayor's communication on the Bay Bridge interurban terminal and a rapid transit system was referred to the Public Utilities Committee.
- Supervisor Uhl proposed a special Board meeting on San Francisco Bay Bridge terminals; the resolution was referred to the Public Utilities Committee.
- Public Utilities Commission asked to plan a rapid transit street railway linked to the Municipal Railway and Bay Bridge; referred to committee.
- The Central Council of Civic Clubs urged that transbay bridge interurban traffic money go to Municipal Railway; referred to Public Utilities Committee.
- Supervisor Uhl's motion to block a monopoly over Bay Bridge interurban train franchises was withdrawn.
- Supervisor Colman's motion authorising the City Attorney to act for San Francisco on Bay Bridge transportation franchise applications was carried.
- Southern Pacific and Key Route proposed electric trains over the Bay Bridge; the matter was referred to the Public Utilities Committee.
- Supervisors Gallagher and Shannon moved objections to exclusive rights and rental terms in the Bay Bridge railroad agreement.
- Bay Bridge Authority seeks a fifteen million dollar RFC loan; telegrams spread in the Journal, no decision taken.
- Supervisor Gallagher moved that the Clerk write federal and state officials urging more time for the Bay Bridge loan.
- The Board finally passed a $25,000 appropriation for the Public Utilities Commission to study Bay Bridge terminal and rapid transit facilities.
- Board adopted a resolution asking the State Railroad Commission for bay bridge rapid transit cost information.
- Supervisor Uhl moved Resolution No. 1678 on the Bay Bridge franchise tax and the City Attorney representing supervisors before the Toll Bridge Authority.
- Supervisor Uhl proposed asking the state to study bus transportation on the Trans-Bay Bridge.
- Supervisor Uhl proposed asking the state to study bus service on the Trans-Bay Bridge and reconsider the RFC resolution.
- Havenner proposed a resolution asking the Toll Bridge Authority to accept a $10,000,000 loan option and study Bay Bridge bus service.
- Supervisor Uhl moved that the City Attorney report on whether interurban trains crossing the Bay Bridge need a franchise.
- Board asked the City Attorney to push for state law letting the Toll Bridge Authority run transit across the Bay Bridge.
- Supervisor Havenner moved that the City Attorney press the conference of city attorneys on Bay Bridge transportation, including State Toll Bridge Authority control.
- A memo on cancelling taxes for property bought for parks, schools and the Trans-Bay Bridge was referred to Finance Committee.
- Consideration of the Public Utilities Commission report on bus and rail transport across the Bay Bridge was put off to March 4, 1935.
- Board asked the Public Utilities Commission to change its Monday meeting so Manager Cahill could attend Bay Bridge transportation hearings.
- Board considered the Public Utilities Commission report on bus and rail transit across the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.
- Motion approving rail transportation across the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge was carried.
- San Mateo County recommended the Mills Field vicinity as the site for a 1938 Bay Bridge exposition; referred to Finance Committee.
- Proposed $5 million bond for 1938 mainland exposition voted down
- The Board asked the Clerk to contact Senator McGovern and Florence McAuliffe about Senate Bill 511 on Bay Bridge rapid transit districts.
- Gallagher moved that the Clerk be directed to report on labor and materials for the Bay Bridges; outcome continues on next page.
- Fourth Street partly closed for Bay Bridge work, May-July 1935
- Healy-Tibbitts allowed to block part of Fourth Street for bridge work
- Traffic engineer to be hired for Bay Bridge traffic study
- Live stock pavilion of $250,000 for Agricultural District No. 1A approved, to be built for the Bay Bridge Exposition.
- A proposal to hire a traffic engineer for Bay Bridge traffic studies was laid over four weeks.
- Supervisor Uhl proposed asking the California Toll Bridge Authority not to grant exclusive Bay Bridge franchises beyond ten years.
- Streets Committee recommendation to hire a traffic engineer for Bay Bridge traffic studies laid over one week.
- Interurban rail contracts over the Bay Bridge were made a special order of business for the following Monday at 3:30 p.m.
- Interurban rail contracts for the Bay Bridge were continued to July 29, 1935, with a call for 40 percent of the bridge loan.
- Hearing on proposed interurban rail contracts for the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge was deferred two weeks.
- Havenner's motion asks the Public Utilities Commission whether over $15,000,000 of the Bay Bridge cost is interurban transportation.
- Board postponed action on the Bay Bridge terminal site at The Embarcadero until Tuesday, August 20, 1935.
- Public Utilities Commission ordered to study and report on Bay Bridge terminal plans, including the Embarcadero and uptown proposals.
- Board held a hearing on proposed contracts between interurban rail companies and the State Toll Bridge Authority for the Bay Bridge.
- A hearing on proposed Embarcadero Terminal Plans for the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge was held, with no outcome yet printed.
- A hearing on proposed contracts between interurban rail companies and the California Toll Bridge Authority for the Bay Bridge was held, with no outcome yet printed.
- Supervisor proposed asking the City Attorney to require railroads using the Bay Bridge lower deck to share costs and stay open.
- Supervisor Hayden moved a vote of thanks to Engineer Purcell and his staff for help with the Bay Bridge terminal discussions.
- A resolution asking the City Attorney to require rail users to share Bay Bridge costs was referred to committee.
- Resolution proposed telling state and federal bridge authorities to require rail carriers to pay their share of Bay Bridge costs; laid over one week.
- Supervisor McSheehy proposed rail contract conditions for the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge; laid over one week.
- Proposed resolution sets conditions for railroad use of the Bay Bridge lower deck, to be considered by the Committee of the Whole.
- Resolution urges the City Attorney to require railroads using the Bay Bridge lower deck to pay a set share of the loan.
- Board proposes that rail carriers using the Bay Bridge's lower deck pay their proportionate share, not vehicle users.
- The Board proposes that railroads using the Bay Bridge lower deck pay their own share of the bridge loan.
- Board urged the state Toll Bridge Authority to keep Bay Bridge vehicle tolls at the lowest possible rates and protest any increase.
- Apartment owners' complaint about Bay Bridge vehicle tolls made a special order of business for November 4, 1935.
- Plan by Sidney W. Taylor for a sub-surface Bay Bridge terminal was referred to a joint committee.
- Supervisors rejected the Taylor subsurface plan for the Bay Bridge terminal and voted against considering further alternative terminal plans.
- $16,500 for street lighting on the Bay Bridge approach streets
- $16,500 for street lighting on the Bay Bridge approach streets
- Ban on billboards near the Bay Bridge approach sought
- A proposed subway from the Bay Bridge approach at Fifth and Harrison to Union Square was put forward by Supervisor Shannon.
- The Mayor was asked to appoint a citizens committee to celebrate the opening of the Bay Bridge.
- The Civic League of Improvement Clubs sent a communication about traffic to the retail district from the Bay Bridge head.
- Supervisor Uhl asked the Public Utilities Commission for a progress report on a $25,000 study of a subway to the Bay Bridge terminal.
- Supervisor Shannon presented a resolution asking Congress to issue silver coins commemorating the Bay Bridge's completion.
- Supervisor Shannon proposed resolution 2504 directing committees to devise ways to handle Bay Bridge opening traffic.
- Resolution asks the Navy to send its U.S. Fleet to San Francisco Bay for the Bay Bridge opening celebration.
- Emergency ordinance appropriates $10,000 for a City Engineer traffic study of streets feeding the Bay Bridge; passed.
- Federal grant sought for rapid transit to Third and Townsend streets
- Counties invited to the Bay Bridge opening in November
- $4,500 for traffic signals on the Bay Bridge approach streets
- Board passed on first reading a $4,500 appropriation for traffic signals in the district south of Market Street near the Bay Bridge approaches.
- $4,500 for traffic signals on the Bay Bridge approach streets
- The Board endorsed the Chamber of Commerce request for a day when pedestrians may walk across the completed San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.
- Residents are urged to visit Oakland on November 12, 1936, when the Bay Bridge opens to vehicles.
- Supervisor Uhl presented a resolution proposing that the Bay Bridges become part of the state highway system and be toll free.
- Traffic link sought from the Fifth and Harrison bridge terminal
- Supervisor Uhl re-presents a proposed ordinance banning advertising signs and billboards within 800 feet of the Bay Bridge.
- Board asked traffic expert Dr. Miller McClintock to report early on Bay Bridge traffic links to the triangle shopping district.
- Motion to recess the Board until October 1 to consider billboards on the Bay Bridge approach was lost.
- Proposed ordinance would ban billboards and advertising signs visible from the Bay Bridge near Fifth and Harrison Streets; committee recommends against passage.
- Billboard and advertising sign ordinance for areas visible from the Bay Bridge was defeated by eight votes to three.
- Fifty-cent Bay Bridge toll urged on the California Toll Bridge Authority
- Supervisors failed to suspend rules for a billboard ban near the Bay Bridge approach; the bill was continued to October 26, 1936.
- Supervisor Shannon presented an ordinance regulating billboards and advertising devices at the Bay Bridge approach, text printed here.'
- Supervisor Ratto presented a resolution asking the City Attorney to survey finances supporting a 50-cent Bay Bridge toll.
- Supervisor Shannon proposed banning billboards and signs within 350 feet of the Bay Bridge; the matter was laid over one week.
- Supervisor Shannon withdrew his proposed ordinance regulating billboard advertising within 350 feet of the Bay Bridge.
- Lieutenant-Governor George J. Hatfield's recommendation on San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge tolls was referred to the Finance Committee.
- Resolution commending Chinese citizens for their participation in the parades celebrating the Bay Bridge's completion.
- Board refused the Southern Pacific Railway's proposed extension of its trains to a terminal near the Bay Bridge.
- Supervisor Schmidt presented a resolution endorsing the Chronicle's plan to cut Bay Bridge tolls from 65 to 25 cents.
- Initiative banning billboards near the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge passed second reading and goes to voters March 2, 1937.
- Bill to submit a Bay Bridge billboard ban initiative to voters on March 9, 1937 passed second reading.
- Action on a petition for a special election on a Bay Bridge billboard ban was deferred.
- Board commends the Sunrise Breakfast Club for taking about two thousand children across the Bay Bridge.
- Ordinance banning signboards near the Bay Bridge passed, to go to voters at a March 9, 1937 special election.
- Petition ordinance banning signboards near the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge was ordered submitted to voters on March 9, 1937.
- Supervisor Schmidt called Resolution 3018 out of committee, making it a special order for March 8, endorsing the Chronicle's plan for a twenty-five cent bay bridge toll.
- Board members were invited to test travel routes to the Bay Bridge head on March 2, 1937.
- Chronicle plan backed to cut Bay Bridge tolls to twenty-five cents
- Chronicle plan would cut Bay Bridge tolls to twenty-five cents
- Committee recommends immediate construction of the Fifth Street extension from Mission to Market Street, toward the Bay Bridge.
- Supervisor Uhl's motion asked the City Attorney to advise on franchises needed for Key System and Southern Pacific trains over the Transbay Bridge; carried.
- Board concurred in the Mayor's supplemental Public Works budget requests, except the $97,500 Bay Bridge approach item.
- Chronicle plan to cut Bay Bridge tolls to 25 cents endorsed
- Resolution on reduced ferry fares and falling Bay Bridge and Golden Gate Bridge tolls is presented for a northern California conference.
- Schmidt brings forward a resolution endorsing the Chronicle's plan to fix the Bay Bridge toll at 25 cents.
- Action on a resolution seeking a conference on Bay Bridge tolls was deferred until October 31, 1937.
- Proposed resolution endorsing the Chronicle's plan to cut Bay Bridge tolls to 25 cents was put off until October 25, 1937.
- Resolution endorses the Chronicle's plan to cut Bay Bridge tolls from 65 to 25 cents; outcome not shown on this page.
- Resolution endorses a San Francisco Chronicle plan to cut Bay Bridge tolls from sixty-five to twenty-five cents per car.
- Resolution endorsing the San Francisco Chronicle's plan to cut Bay Bridge tolls to 25 cents is proposed.
- The two bay bridges urged into the State Highway System
- The two bay bridges urged into the State Highway System
- The Board took a roll call on Supervisor McSheehy's amendment to the Bay Bridge toll motion; the result continues on the next page.
- Supervisors debated Resolution 3817 to buy ferry franchises to reduce Bay Bridge and Golden Gate Bridge competition; no final vote printed here.
- Resolution urging the Toll Bridge Authority to defer the ferry franchise purchase and cut Bay Bridge tolls is still under debate.
- The Board rejected a motion to send a three-member committee to Sacramento over Bay Bridge costs and tolls.
- $75,000 for streetcar tracks on First and Fremont streets
- Federal grant sought for a walkway from the Bay Bridge terminal
- Resolution proposed to approve the Rapid Transit Committee's recommendations, including a Market Street pedestrian passage from the Bay Bridge terminal, funded by bonds.
- Federal grant sought for a walkway from the Bay Bridge terminal
- Ordinance reappropriating $131.13 for extra work on safety islands at the Fifth Street approach to Bay Bridge passed for second reading.
- $131.13 more for safety islands at the Fifth Street bridge approach
- Board asked the Mayor to appoint a citizens' committee for the January 1939 dedication of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge rail terminal.
- Proposed $15,000 from Municipal Railway surplus to finish switch and signal systems at the Bay Bridge Terminal; referred to committee.
- Ordinance for $15,000 from Municipal Railway surplus for streetcar switches and signals at Bay Bridge Terminal passed second reading.
- Ordinance passed appropriating $15,000 from Municipal Railway surplus to finish switch and signal work at Bay Bridge Terminal Station.
- Supervisors passed on first reading a $8,320 appropriation for streetcar operation at the Bay Bridge terminal, half paid by Market Street Railway Company.
- Supervisor Ratto asked Public Works for a cost estimate of a subway or overpass near Bay Bridge Terminal.
- Mayor forwards Cahill and Purcell's five traffic recommendations for the Bay Bridge Terminal area to the Board and Police Commission.
- $8,320 for streetcar service at the Bay Bridge Terminal
- Governor asked to order separated traffic lanes on the Bay Bridge to stop fatal head-on collisions; referred to committee.
- Board proposes asking the Governor to have the Toll Bridge Authority separate traffic lanes on the Bay Bridge to prevent head-on collisions.
- Supervisor Brown reported that a Bay Bridge toll reduction for Exposition-bound traffic could cut the fair's cost, pending a motion by McGowan.
- The Public Utilities Committee reported on possibly forming a utilities district to refinance Bay Bridge bonds; no action yet recorded.
- Supervisor Uhl called attention to a fatal collision on the Bay Bridge and to a earlier request for traffic separation.
- Agreement with California Toll Bridge Authority to paint the city's pipe line on the Bay Bridge is proposed.
- The Public Utilities Commission would contract with the California Toll Bridge Authority to paint the city's pipe line on the Bay Bridge.
- Supervisor Uhl moved that the Governor and Public Works Director again be asked to prevent Bay Bridge accidents; ordered without objection.
- Question over rising Bay Bridge upkeep costs sent to committee
- Supervisor McSheehy presented a resolution urging reduced Golden Gate Bridge tolls, citing the Bay Bridge's lower toll.
- The Board referred a resolution urging additional guards for the Golden Gate and Bay Bridges to the Police Committee.
- Resolution urges Governor Olson or Mayor Rossi to add guards to the Golden Gate and Bay Bridges; adopted.
- Supervisor Roncovieri presented a resolution mourning engineer John D. Galloway, who advised on Hetch Hetchy and the Bay Bridge.
- Proposed agreement with the State on gasoline tax funds for signals at Harrison-Fifth Street and the Bay Bridge approach was referred to Finance Committee.
- The Board adopted a supplemental state highway agreement adding signals and channelization at Harrison-Fifth Street and the Bay Bridge approach.
- Supervisor Brown proposed one-way lower-deck traffic on the Bay Bridge during rush hours to relieve congestion.
- Supervisor Mead proposed urging Congress to study a new low-level Bay Bridge; the matter was referred to the Commercial and Industrial Development Committee.
- Board approved a committee report recommending separate truck and bus toll gates, bridge traffic stations, and signal lighting on the Bay Bridge.
- A resolution proposed petitioning the War Department to approve a trans-bay bridge from Hunters Point to Bay Farm Island.
- Proposed $37,500 for a state study of a second San Francisco Bay bridge was re-referred to Finance Committee.
- Action on the $37,500 request to fund a second bay bridge study was postponed until the matter comes before the Board officially.
- Supervisor MacPhee proposed $37,500 toward a state study of a second Bay Bridge; consideration put off to March 4.
- Better road to the Golden Gate Bridge urged on the state
- Board petitions War Department to approve plans for studying a trans-bay bridge from Hunters Point to Bay Farm Island.
- Proposal 5241, urging a Trans-Bay Bridge study, was re-referred to the County, State and National Affairs Committee.
- Board asked the Chief Administrative Officer to provide $37,500 to the state for a second Bay bridge study.
- Board considers recommending $37,500 from the Chief Administrative Officer for a State study of a second San Francisco Bay bridge; consideration continued.
- Proposed $37,500 from city funds for a state study of a second San Francisco Bay bridge crossing; outcome not yet shown.
- Proposal to give the State Department of Public Works $37,500 for a second Bay bridge study was taken up and postponed.
- Board proposed giving the State Department of Public Works $37,500 for a study of a second Bay bridge.
- Board refused to ask the Chief Administrative Officer for $37,500 to fund a state study of a second Bay bridge.
- Parking lots approved under the Bay Bridge approach downtown
- California Toll Bridge Authority proposed leasing the Bay Bridge approach land at Second to Fifth Streets for controlled parking.
- Board adopted a resolution asking the Mayor to appoint a citizens' committee for the Bay Bridge plaque unveiling.
- Supervisor Lewis was authorized to travel to Washington, D.C., to press San Francisco's case for a second bay bridge crossing.
- Board memorializes state agencies to install a dividing rod on the Bay Bridge; referred to committee.
- Parking sought again under the Bay Bridge between Second and Fourth
- Board petitions the state Toll Bridge Authority to open land under the Bay Bridge's west end for parking.
- Parking sought again under the Bay Bridge between Second and Fourth
- Board instructed the City Attorney to investigate legal options to stop a second Bay bridge next to the existing one.
- A resolution asking the City Attorney to prepare legal action against any parallel Bay Bridge was referred to committee.
- Resolution adopted asking the Mayor to gather data and authorizing the City Attorney to back a Bay Bridge traffic suit.
- Supervisor Lewis's motion asking the City Attorney to report on blocking state funds for a parallel bay bridge was sent back to committee.
- Board urged the State Department of Public Works to build additional approaches to the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.
- Mayor vetoed File 4859, a resolution urging the State Public Works Department to build more San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge approaches.
- Mayor's veto sustained, so the resolution urging state work on more San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge approaches failed.
- Supervisor Lewis asked officials to meet on new Bay Bridge approaches; referred to Streets Committee.
- Lewis moves that city officials meet with Alameda County and state officials on Bay Bridge approaches.
- MacPhee withdrew his motion to hold a committee-of-the-whole hearing on Bay Bridge approaches.
- Resolution asking the State Legislature and agencies to study a monorail on the Bay Bridge was referred to committee.
- A proposed uniform city position on the financial matters of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge was referred to committee.
- Bay bridge refinancing policy sent to committee for study
- Motion to hold a special Board meeting on December 12 to set a policy on refinancing the Bay Bridge lost.
- Board debated a resolution opposing $50 million more Bay Bridge bonds; Supervisor MacPhee wanted it strengthened, outcome pending.
- Supervisor Lewis presented a resolution opposing additional Bay Bridge bonded debt except for financing a southern bay crossing.
- The Board adopted a resolution opposing additional Bay Bridge bonded debt unless it finances a southern bay crossing.
- Lewis's resolution opposing removal of [name withheld] tracks from the lower level of the Bay Bridge was referred to committee.
- The Board opposed Key System plan to replace A and B line trains on the Bay Bridge lower level with buses.
- A policy resolution supporting parallel and southern Bay bridges and a bridge district was sent to the County, State and National Affairs Committee.
- Board continued the pending measure on additional Bay bridges for two weeks after a re-referral motion was withdrawn.
- The Board referred a resolution opposing an end to Bay Bridge tolls to the County, State and National Affairs Committee.
- Supervisor Lewis proposed urging the Toll Bridge Authority to speed traffic on the Bay Bridge; debate set for April 13.
- Resolution urging the Toll Bridge Authority to expedite Bay Bridge traffic was referred to the County, State and National Affairs Committee.
- Consideration of a resolution urging the California Toll Bridge Authority to study ways to speed Bay Bridge traffic was temporarily postponed.
- Proposed Bay Bridge toll reduction sent to the Finance Committee after objections blocked immediate action.
- Board adopted a resolution recommending Congress amend Public Law 695 to allow continued Bay Bridge tolls.
- Measure urging the Toll Bridge Authority to improve Bay Bridge traffic flow was moved from committee to the June 22 calendar.
- Resolution adopted urging the state Toll Bridge Authority to consider traffic-safety suggestions for the Bay Bridge.
- Board proposes conditional support for state bill S.B. 2289 on Bay Bridge tolls, if amended as the city's delegation recommends.
- Board debates a resolution backing federal amendments to the Consent Statute so Bay Bridge tolls can fund the Southern Crossing.
- Board debated a proposed resolution on Bay Bridge toll collection under the federal consent statute; no final vote yet.
- Resolution proposed to extend Bay Bridge tolls and back federal legislation on up to two new crossings; vote continues on the next page.
- Board adopted a resolution declaring policy on federal bill S.B. 2289 concerning Bay Bridge tolls, repealing Resolution 13505.
- The Board adopted a resolution asking the Mayor to seek assurance that rails on the San Francisco Bay Bridge will not be abandoned.
- Resolution asking the Mayor to appoint a committee to arrange East Bay talks on a Bay Bridge rail plan was referred to committee.
- Committee recommends approving state bills AB 146 on hospital construction funding and AB 1419 on Bay Bridge rails.
- Board adopted its approval of AB 1419, a state bill to keep rails on the Bay Bridge until mass transit planning is complete.
- The Board adopted a resolution backing A.B. 51, a state bill on toll bridges and approaches to the Southern Crossing of the Bay Bridge.
- Resolution opposing removal of Bay Bridge trains if motor coaches would add buses on San Francisco streets was adopted.
- Resolution opposing use of Bay Bridge funds dedicated to the southern crossing for other purposes was adopted.
- Supervisor Halley asked the Public Utilities Commission to study city streetcars on the Bay Bridge; sent to Streets Committee.
- A resolution declaring the city's position on a state bill for the Southern Crossing and Bay Bridge rails was adopted as amended.
- Board considered a resolution reaffirming its position on state bill AB 3370 and keeping Bay Bridge rails; consideration was postponed.
- A proposed resolution opposing abandonment of Bay Bridge rail service was referred to the County, State and National Affairs Committee.
- Resolution urging the State to defer removing Bay Bridge rails until rapid transit plans are submitted.
- The Clerk was directed to ask the Police Department to watch traffic near the Bay Bridge Terminal from [name withheld] buses.
- City backed state bill using Bay Bridge tolls for other crossings
- Supervisor Ferdon's motion postponed consideration of a state bill on Bay Bridge revenues so an amendment could be drafted.
- State bill on bridge toll money put off for later.
- An adoption vote with no subject on this page
- The westerly crosswalk at Fremont Street across the Bay Bridge off-ramp was eliminated by ordinance.
- Supervisor Blake's resolution urging a southern Bay crossing ending at [name withheld] was referred to the Transportation Committee.
- Supervisor Blake's proposal urging a southern Bay crossing from [name withheld] was put over to the end of the meeting.
- A resolution urging a bay crossing from [name withheld] to southern Alameda County was tabled, shelving the proposal.
- Supervisors urged a southern Bay bridge from India Basin
- Board adopted Transportation Committee recommendations urging enactment of several pending state bills, including scenic easements and Bay Bridge rates.
- Board adopted a resolution favoring state bill SB 775, raising Bay Bridge tolls to fund Bay Area rapid transit.
- Board adopted a resolution authorizing a quitclaim deed to the State of vacated portions of First, Rincon, and Sterling Streets for the Bay Bridge.
- Lawsuit settlement with Bay Bridge Garage awaits final vote
- Board of Supervisors passed settlement of city lawsuit against Bay Bridge Garage and [name withheld] for $3,583.33.
- Board urges support for bridge tolls or vehicle taxes to fund BART; sent to State and National Affairs Committee.
- Proposed zoning map changes and special height and use districts covering an area from Fort Mason to the Bay Bridge passed for second reading.
- Waterfront height limit of 175 feet proposed for the ballot
- Embarcadero height limits near the Bay Bridge [name withheld] again
- Height limits along The Embarcadero near the Bay Bridge put off
- Call to delay a new East Bay bridge sent to committee.
- Board opposes proposed Southern Bay bridge, as amended
- Waterfront rezoning near the Bay Bridge wins first approval
- Zoning map change for waterfront land along The Embarcadero between Howard Street and the Bay Bridge continues onto the next page.
- Proposed: city opposes state bill diverting Bay Bridge money.
- Billboard request now covers only the northern waterfront up to Bay Bridge
- Resolution against northern billboards between Fisherman's Wharf and the Bay Bridge was adopted as amended, 6 to 4.
- Hearing requested on concurring with temporary closure of two lower-deck lanes of the Bay Bridge on a Sunday in October; outcome continues.
- Support proposed for a Bay Bridge run aiding a music school.
- Bay Bridge run to raise money for music school; not yet decided.
- City backs Bay Bridge run raising money for music school.
- City urges state to allow Bay Bridge closures for hike-bike events.
- Supervisor Nelder's proposed legislation to stop towed Bay Bridge cars being parked illegally on city streets was referred to committee.
- Bay Bridge lane closing for a charity run sent to committee
- Downtown streets closed for the start of a Bay Bridge footrace
- Closure of two Bay Bridge upper-deck lanes on June 10, 1984 for a Mental Health Association fundraising run was supported.
- A request to consider city support for the Bay Bridge Run for Mental Health was referred to Transportation and Traffic Committee.
- Folsom Street to close for the Bay Bridge Run staging
- Resolution supporting closing two Bay Bridge upper-deck lanes for a Mental Health Association fund-raising run; vote not shown.
- Folsom Street closing for the Bay Bridge Run sent to committee
- Rincon Hill to be rezoned for housing near the Bay Bridge
- Proposed rezoning of land bounded by the Bay Bridge, Essex, Folsom and Steuart Streets was continued to November 4, 1985.
- Proposed change to height and bulk limits for land bounded by the Bay Bridge, Essex, Folsom and Steuart Streets was continued to November 4, 1985.
- Board rescinded its second-reading vote and amended the Rincon Hill special use district planning code ordinance, shortening its title.
- Rincon Hill Special Use District ordinance passed as final, setting rules for uses, height, bulk, parking and open space.
- Two upper-deck lanes of the Bay Bridge closed June 1, 1986 for a Mental Health Association fundraising run.
- The Embarcadero to close for the Bay Bridge Run staging
- Molinari urged the Chief Administrative Officer to fund $50,000 for permanent Bay Bridge lighting; referred to committee.
- The Board adopted a resolution urging $50,000 from the Hotel Room Tax Fund for permanent Bay Bridge lighting.
- Temporary street closures for a bike ride approved.
- The Board adopted a resolution supporting Regional Measure 1, a uniform $1 toll on seven state Bay bridges, on the November 1988 ballot.
- Adopted resolution urging the Mayor to oppose Caltrans' widening of I-80 Eastshore Freeway between the Bay Bridge and Carquinez Bridge.
- Resolution supporting state bill SB 2100 would let the Metropolitan Transportation Commission set Bay Bridge tolls.
- The Board adopted a resolution backing state bill SB 2100, which would let regional transport authorities add a Bay Bridge toll surcharge.
- Supervisor Hallinan requested a hearing on plans to repair or replace the Bay Bridge Terminal Connector; referred to committee.
- Supervisor Britt's request to consider endorsing higher Bay Bridge tolls for regional transit was referred to the Economic and Social Policy Committee.
- The Board adopted as amended a resolution supporting state bill SB 210 on raising Bay Bridge and other bridge tolls for transit.
- Closing three Bay Bridge lanes for the Lifespan run endorsed
- Board endorses Lifespan's running event and asks the state to close three Bay Bridge lanes.
- Resolution urges the Governor to allow closing the Bay Bridge for the Lifespan charity run.
- Resolution supporting closing the Bay Bridge for the Lifespan running event is referred to the Board for adoption March 8.
- Board adopted as amended a resolution supporting closing the Bay Bridge for Lifespan, a charity run and walk.
- Resolution endorsing the Lifespan Bay Bridge 10K race was sent to the Board for adoption without committee.
- The Board adopted a resolution endorsing the Lifespan Bay Bridge 10K Race and proclaiming September 24, 1995 [name withheld].
- Hearing on the design and financing of the eastern Bay Bridge sent to the Economic Development Committee.
- Board urged MTC and CalTrans to include a Bay Bridge bike path in the reconstruction design.
- Hearing requested on proposals for the Bay Bridge alignment; received and assigned to committee.
- Hearing on retrofitting the western Bay Bridge approach was referred to Economic Development, Transportation and Technology Committee.
- Supervisor Yaki's hearing on retrofitting the western Bay Bridge approach was held and continued to the Call of the Chair.
- Caltrans urged to put passenger rail on a rebuilt Bay Bridge
- Resolution urges City, MTC and Caltrans to keep passenger rail in the Bay Bridge redesign; adopted.
- Resolution urging regional transit commission to reject a BART financing plan that diverts Bay Bridge tolls from Muni was referred to committee.
- Resolution urging the Metropolitan Transportation Commission not to approve financing for the Bay Area Rapid Transit extension that diverts Bay Bridge toll revenue from Muni.
- Resolution urging the Metropolitan Transportation Commission not to approve BART financing that diverts Bay Bridge toll revenue from Muni was continued to March 8.
- Hearing on planning and mitigation for the Bay Bridge West Span and Bayshore Freeway projects was assigned to the Transportation and Land Use Committee.
- Supervisor Becerril requested a hearing on the Bay Bridge western approach retrofit's traffic and parking impacts; referred to committee.
- Supervisor Becerril asked for a hearing on traffic and parking impacts of the Bay Bridge western approach retrofit; referred to committee.
- A hearing was requested on the city's coordination with Caltrans over the western Bay Bridge seismic retrofit and traffic mitigation.
- Hearing requested on city coordination with Caltrans over the western span seismic retrofit of the Bay Bridge.
- Supervisor Newsom's hearing request on parking loss from Bay Bridge retrofit work was referred to the Housing, Transportation and Land Use Committee.
- Newsom requested a hearing on parking lost to Bay Bridge approach retrofit work; referred to the Housing, Transportation and Land Use Committee.
- Proposed purchase of a permanent easement at Main and Bryant Streets for $650,000 for the Bay Bridge Pump Station, referred to Finance Committee.
- Board urges the state or Bay Area counties to set congestion pricing on the Bay Bridge; sent to Transportation and Commerce Committee.
- Resolution urging the state Legislature to create a congestion pricing program for the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge was sent to committee.
- Hearing on congestion pricing tolls for the Bay Bridge was received and assigned to the Rules and Audits Committee.
- Supervisor Sandoval's proposed hearing on Bay Bridge congestion pricing tolls was assigned to the Rules and Audits Committee.
- Board adopted a resolution urging state or regional legislation to create congestion pricing for the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.
- Bridge congestion-pricing vote for November ballot turned down.
- Board refused to put a congestion pricing policy for Bay Bridge tolls to voters on the November 5, 2002 ballot.
- City urges state to add congestion charges on Bay Bridge.
- Board urged Caltrans and state legislators to name the new Bay Bridge additions in honor of Emperor Norton I.
- Resolution urging Caltrans to name new Bay Bridge additions after Emperor Norton was continued to December 14, 2004.
- Hearing requested on safety and emergency procedures for the Bay Bridge and Golden Gate Bridge, sent to committee.
- Closed-session hearing on security breaches at the Port, Golden Gate Bridge and Bay Bridge sent to Police Department for comment.
- Hearing requested on safety and emergency procedures for the Bay Bridge and Golden Gate Bridge, sent to committee.
- Closed hearing on port and bridge security breaches sent to committee.
- Request for Bay Bridge bike path money goes to next meeting.
- City urges state to fund a Bay Bridge bike and walk path.
- Resolution urges the state to fund the Bay Bridge West Span bicycle and pedestrian pathway in any infrastructure bond.
- Resolution proposed urging the State Legislature to fund the Bay Bridge West Span bicycle and pedestrian pathway; referred for adoption.
- Supervisor Daly's resolution urging state bond funding for the Bay Bridge bicycle pathway was referred for adoption.
- Adopted a resolution urging the state to fund the Bay Bridge west span bicycle and pedestrian pathway in any infrastructure bond.
- City asks state to fund Bay Bridge bike and walking path.
- Agreement splitting upkeep of 101/280 interchange sent to committee.
- Deal proposed with the state for Beale Street anchorage security
- Support proposed for Bay Bridge light art display, 2012 to 2014.
- City backs Bay Bridge light art display through 2014.
- City backs state solar bill for low-income neighbourhoods linked by the name only, not checked
- New Bay Bridge ramps to Yerba Buena Island opened in 2016
- Bay Bridge western span to be named for Willie Brown
- No decision; speaker opposed renaming Bay Bridge; others backed City College.
- Speakers on City College; one opposed renaming Bay Bridge. No vote shown.
- City access to Bay Bridge fiber-optic cables sent to committee
- Two Bay Bridge fiber-optic agreements with Pacific Bell proposed
- Bay Bridge fiber-optic access deals with Pacific Bell approved