All decisions
about 350 Board decisions about Palace of Fine Arts, in date order. Each links to its printed page.
- Supervisor Power moved a resolution urging that the Palace of Fine Arts at the Exposition be preserved; outcome continues on next page.
- Supervisor Power's resolution urging transfer of the Palace of Fine Arts land from the Presidio to San Francisco was referred to committee.
- A committee-amended resolution urges keeping the Palace of Fine Arts at the Presidio permanently after the Exposition.
- Congressman Nolan backs saving the Palace of Fine Arts
- City land for a Presidio railroad strip and Palace of Fine Arts grounds was passed to federal and university uses.
- Proposed ordinance would let the city exchange Palace of Fine Arts land for a Presidio railroad right of way.
- Board endorsed observing Mothers' Day next Sunday at the Palace of Fine Arts, with members attending when duties allow.
- City Attorney authorized to consent to a judgment letting the United States take a railroad right-of-way in exchange for Palace of Fine Arts land.
- The Board refused to insure paintings held by the Alien Property Custodian on exhibit at the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Mayor Rolph forwarded a women's clubs request that Congress dedicate Palace of Fine Arts land to the city; referred to committee.
- City Planning Commission's proposal to acquire the Palace of Fine Arts was referred to the Education, Parks and Playgrounds Committee.
- San Francisco Museum of Art proposes the City buy nine acres under the Palace of Fine Arts; referred to committee.
- Resolution urges negotiations to transfer nine acres under the Palace of Fine Arts to San Francisco.
- Proposed resolution asks the Park Commission to take possession of the Palace of Fine Arts and adjacent grounds.
- City Planning Commission urged repairing the Palace of Fine Arts with $290,000; decision laid over until January 11, 1926.
- Consideration of the City Planning Commission's report on repairing and acquiring the Palace of Fine Arts was laid over until February 15, 1926.
- A resolution proposes preserving the Palace of Fine Arts as a memorial of the Panama-Pacific Exposition and a center for art.
- Use of money set aside for Marina Exposition purposes to repair the Palace of Fine Arts was referred to the Finance Committee.
- A proposed charter amendment would let the city accept Palace of Fine Arts land from the United States for a spur track.
- Resolution adopted placing Charter Amendments 29 through 39, including the Air Port and Palace of Fine Arts measures, on the November 1926 ballot.
- Federal deed for 9.93 acres of Presidio land under the Palace of Fine Arts accepted by the city.
- Offer by Albert R. Herman et al. to sell land at Jefferson and Lyon streets for Palace of Fine Arts accepted for $11,625.
- Jefferson and Lyon land bought for the Palace of Fine Arts
- Board authorized an $11,625 payment to Albert R. Herman et al. for land at Jefferson and Lyon streets for the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Monson Bros. is paid $6,789 for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts, in a January 1928 claims schedule.
- Paid $13,516.50 to Monson Bros. for a second contract on Palace of Fine Arts repairs.
- Paid $12,100 to Monson Bros., final payment for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Monson Bros. was owed $10,455.46 balance on oil contracts for rehabilitating the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Monson Bros. was paid $668.40 for extra cleaning and painting of the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Claim of $668.40 to Monson Bros. for extra cleaning and painting of the Palace of Fine Arts is listed for payment.
- Voters are asked to accept the Palace of Fine Arts deed from the United States and validate a spur track ordinance.
- Monson Bros. was paid $1,223.75 for removing the old floor at the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Monson Bros. was paid $1,223.75 for removing an old floor at the Palace of Fine Arts.
- City Planning Commission asked the Board to start condemnation proceedings for land needed for the Palace of Fine Arts Building; referred to committee.
- Palace of Fine Arts building repair budget item approved; the increase to $200,000 was referred to the Finance Committee.
- Board approved a $1,500 payment to Henry D. Dewell for plans on California Palace of Fine Arts repairs.
- Stephenson Construction Co. was paid $7,350 for the second stage of repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Stephenson Construction Co. was paid $9,369 for the third stage of repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Stephenson Construction Co. was listed for $7,350, second payment on repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Stephenson Construction Co. was listed for $9,369, third payment on repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- A claim of $6,396 to Stephenson Construction Co. for a fourth repair payment at the Palace of Fine Arts is listed.
- Payment of $6,396 to Stephenson Construction Co. for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- A fifth payment of $3,405 was claimed by Stephenson Construction Co. for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Stephenson Construction Co. was paid $3,405, its fifth installment, for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Clinton-Stephenson Construction Co. sixth payment of $857.25 for Palace of Fine Arts repairs is listed.
- Claims paid for hospital food, orphanages and Palace of Fine Arts
- City paid Standard Gypsum Company $810.50 for casting plaster used at the Palace of Fine Arts.
- City made the final $9,945.92 payment to Clinton-Stephenson Construction Company for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Claims paid for hospital food, orphanages and Palace of Fine Arts
- City reimbursed the Board of Park Commissioners $714.95 for improvements at the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Henry D. Dewell was paid $1,000 partial payment for plans and specifications for Palace of Fine Arts repairs.
- The Patent Scaffolding Company was paid $620 for tubular scaffolding furnished for Palace of Fine Arts.
- J. P. Holland, Inc. was paid $650 for shovel and crew services at Palace of Fine Arts.
- Payment of $2,937.03 approved to the Park Commission for rehabilitating the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Payment of $520 approved to J. P. Holland, Inc. for a shovel and crew repairing the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Payment of $703.87 approved to Paul E. Denivelle for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul E. Denivelle was paid $703.87 for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- The Board of Park Commissioners was reimbursed $2,937.03 for rehabilitating the Palace of Fine Arts.
- J. P. Holland, Inc. was paid $520 for a shovel and crew repairing the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Board of Park Commissioners sought $1,858.75 reimbursement for rehabilitating the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul E. Denivelle claimed $684.93 for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Nephi Plaster claimed $865.30 for plaster furnished to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Payment of $1,558.75 to reimburse the Park Commission for rehabilitating the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Payment of $865.30 to Nephi Plaster & Mfg. Co. for plaster furnished for the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Payment of $684.93 to Paul E. Denivelle for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Payment of $615.97 to Paul E. Denivelle for Palace of Fine Arts repairs is listed in the claims schedule.
- Payment of $725.34 to Paul E. Denivelle for Palace of Fine Arts repairs is listed in the claims schedule.
- Payment of $698.75 to Nephi Plaster & Manufacturing Co. for Palace of Fine Arts plaster is listed.
- Payment of $803.63 to Paul E. Denivelle for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Payment of $688.13 to Standard Gypsum Co. for plaster used in Palace of Fine Arts repairs.
- Paul E. Denivelle is listed for $725.34 of repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts; the outcome is not printed here.
- Paul E. Denivelle is listed for $615.97 of repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts; the outcome is not printed here.
- Nephi Plaster & Manufacturing Co. is listed for $698.75 of plaster for the Palace of Fine Arts; the outcome is not printed here.
- Payment of $744.48 to Paul B. Denivelle for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts was approved.
- Second payment of $12,751.76 to Monson Bros. under the Palace of Fine Arts repair contract was approved.
- Claim of $760.44 to Paul E. Denivelle for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts is listed for payment.
- Claim of $679.27 to Paul E. Denivelle for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts is listed for payment.
- Park Commissioners were reimbursed $878.75 for rehabilitating the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Xephi Plaster & Mfg. Co. was paid $595.00 for plaster mix used at the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul E. Denivelle was paid $905.50 for labour improving the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul E. Denivelle was paid $765.86 for labour improving the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Reimbursement of $1,148.71 to the Park Commission for improvements to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Payment of $860.02 to Paul E. Denivelle for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Reimbursement of $1,600.54 to the Park Commission for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Payment of $916.90 to Paul E. Denivelle for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Approved a $905.59 payment to Paul E. Denivelle for labour improving the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Approved a $765.86 payment to Paul E. Denivelle for labour improving the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Park Commission was reimbursed $1,148.71 for improvements to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Park Commission was reimbursed $1,600.54 for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul E. Denivelle was paid $916.90 for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul E. Denivelle was paid $860.02 for further repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul E. Denivelle is paid $913.89 for further repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Monson Bros. is paid $3,978.95 for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul E. Denivelle is paid $909.42 for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Park Commission claim of $3,333.75 for reconstruction of the Palace of Fine Arts listed for payment.
- Paul E. Denivelle claim of $1,026.36 for reconstruction of the Palace of Fine Arts listed for payment.
- Paul E. Denivelle claim of $740.55 for reconstruction of the Palace of Fine Arts listed for payment.
- Paul E. Denivelle was paid $752.45 for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul E. Denivelle was paid $935.94 for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Nephi Plaster & Mfg. Co. was paid $749 for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Payment of $935.94 to Paul E. Denivelle for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts is proposed.
- Payment of $749.00 to Nephi Plaster & Mfg. Co. for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts is proposed.
- Payment of $752.45 to Paul E. Denivelle for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts is proposed.
- A $1,500 appropriation to paint loading zones and traffic lanes was passed for printing.
- A $25,000 appropriation to continue rehabilitating the Palace of Fine Arts was passed for printing.
- Paul K. Denivelle is owed $654.53 for further repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Nephi Plaster and Manufacturing Company is owed $765 for plaster mix used at the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul K. Denivelle is owed $664.86 for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Board appropriated $25,000 from the General Fund to continue rehabilitating the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Claim of $3,066 reimburses the Park Commission for expenditures on the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Claim of $689.23 to Paul E. Denivelle for repairs at the Palace of Fine Arts is presented for payment.
- Payment of $689.23 to Paul E. Denivelle for repairs at the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Reimbursement of $3,066.00 to the Park Commission for expenditures at the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul E. Denivelle claimed $1,294.97 for reconstruction work at the Palace of Fine Arts, listed for payment from the General Fund.
- Paul E. Denivelle claimed $561.70 for reconstruction work at the Palace of Fine Arts, listed for payment from the General Fund.
- Claim of $2,451.87 for reimbursement of Palace of Fine Arts rehabilitation, paid to the Park Commissioners.
- Claim of $765 submitted by Nephi Plaster and Manufacturing Company for plaster mix at Palace of Fine Arts.
- Claim of $735.78 submitted by Paul E. Denivelle for labor on the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Claim of Paul E. Denivelle for $1,487.77 for labor on reconstruction of the Palace of Fine Arts listed for payment.
- Claim of Paul E. Denivelle for $663.23 for labor on reconstruction of the Palace of Fine Arts listed for payment.
- Paul E. Denivelle was paid $1,551.92 for rehabilitation work on the Palace of Fine Arts.
- The Board of Park Commissioners was reimbursed $2,994.25 for rehabilitating the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul E. Denivelle was paid $676.06 for rehabilitation work on the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul E. Denivelle was paid $785.99 for rehabilitation work at the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul E. Denivelle was paid $916.25 for rehabilitation work at the Palace of Fine Arts.
- The Rix Company, Inc. was paid $875 for a portable compressor used at the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul E. Denivelle was paid $906.20 for improvement work at the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul E. Denivelle was paid $941.35 for further improvement work at the Palace of Fine Arts.
- A reimbursement of $1,136.24 to the Board of Park Commissioners for rehabilitating the Palace of Fine Arts was allowed.
- A final payment of $7,305.60 to Monson Brothers for rehabilitating the Palace of Fine Arts was allowed.
- Paul E. Denivelle was paid $3,989.69 for labor at the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Palace of Fine Arts labor paid to Paul E. Denivelle
- Paul E. Denivelle was paid $1,041.16 for labor at the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul E. Denivelle was paid $1,038.81 for labor at the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Fifteen claims for payment from city funds, including Palace of Fine Arts reconstruction, were passed for printing.
- Paul Denivelle paid for rebuilding the Palace of Fine Arts
- Paul Denivelle paid for rebuilding the Palace of Fine Arts
- Claim of $924.31 to Paul E. Denivelle for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts is listed for payment.
- Claim of $946.85 to Paul E. Denivelle for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts is listed for payment.
- Appropriation of $25,000 from the General Fund proposed to continue rehabilitating the Palace of Fine Arts, at the Park Commission's request.
- Payment of $2,384.99 to Paul E. Denivelle for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts is listed for payment.
- Nephi Plaster & Mfg. Company was paid $765.00 for plaster used on Palace of Fine Arts repairs.
- Resolution appropriates $25,000 from the General Fund to continue rehabilitating the Palace of Fine Arts, at the Park Commission's request.
- Paul E. Denivelle was paid $823.53 for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Payment of $1,700.91 to Paul E. Denivelle for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Payment of $812.19 to Paul E. Denivelle for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul E. Denivelle is paid $1,700.91 for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul E. Denivelle is paid $812.19 for further repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- City pays Paul E. Denivelle $1,274.67 for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Payment of $1,274.67 to Paul E. Denivelle for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts was approved.
- Paul E. Denivelle is paid $1,383.96 for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts, claim dated November 19, 1931.
- Claim of $1,383.96 to Paul E. Denivelle for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts, listed for payment.
- Claim of $1,555.46 paid to Paul E. Denivelle for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- City paid Paul E. Denivelle $1,555.46 for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul E. Denivelle was paid $767.61 for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Paul E. Denivelle was paid $767.61 for repairs to the Palace of Fine Arts.
- $12,500 added for the roadway circling the Palace of Fine Arts
- Roadway around Palace of Fine Arts off Lyon Street improved, $12,500 added
- Park Department budget was approved with an added $78,200 item for the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Ordinance proposed to let the City Attorney settle a $20,000 lawsuit by the Museum of Art trustees over the Palace of Fine Arts.
- City Attorney authorized to settle the Museum of Art trustees' suit over the Palace of Fine Arts for $20,000.
- Funding of $35,000 for the Palace of Fine Arts rehabilitation was defeated.
- Supervisor Uhl moved that the Director of Property appraise land north of the Palace of Fine Arts proposed as a playground.
- $35,000 set aside to repair the Palace of Fine Arts
- Federal grant application for replacements and alterations at the Palace of Fine Arts was adopted.
- A 45 per cent federal grant application for Palace of Fine Arts and school buildings was approved by the Mayor and referred to the Finance Committee.
- A resolution proposed accepting a federal grant of up to $28,620 to reconstruct and improve the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Emergency ordinance adds $19,080 from accrued surplus in the Palace of Fine Arts reconstruction fund, passed finally.
- Application to the federal Public Works agency for a grant to alter the Palace of Fine Arts was authorized.
- The Board asked the Park Commission whether the Palace of Fine Arts could house a San Francisco science and industry museum.
- Extension of time for Park Commission contracts for Yacht Harbor dredging and Palace of Fine Arts tennis courts is pending.
- Neighbors oppose three houses beside the Palace of Fine Arts
- Board fails to overturn the dropped setback line on Lyon Street
- Board proposes budgeting funds to buy Lyon Street property adjoining the Palace of Fine Arts for park use.
- $50,000 proposed for land beside the Palace of Fine Arts
- Supervisor Shannon asked the Director of Property to appraise the Johnson property on Lyons Street beside the Palace of Fine Arts.
- The California Spring Blossom and Wild Flower Association urged rehabilitation of the Palace of Fine Arts; referred to the Finance Committee.
- Board proposed asking the federal government to convey the land under the Palace of Fine Arts to San Francisco.
- Board petitions Congress to give San Francisco full title to land under the Palace of Fine Arts, which the United States still occupies.
- Supervisor Mancuso's resolution to study using the Palace of Fine Arts as a permanent fair site was referred to committee.
- The Board directed committees to study whether the Palace of Fine Arts can be used as a permanent building.
- Supervisor Christopher's request for a Palace of Fine Arts funding study was referred to the Finance Committee.
- Call to restore the Palace of Fine Arts sent to committee
- Tennis courts sought again at the Palace of Fine Arts
- Department in charge of Palace of Fine Arts asked to consider restoring indoor tennis courts in future plans.
- Agreement with the State of California for National Guard use of seven acres at Fort Funston and the Palace of Fine Arts continued one week.
- Agreement with the State for National Guard use of seven acres at Fort Funston and the Palace of Fine Arts approved.
- Board adopted a resolution filing the Planning Director's report on a proposed City-State agreement for National Guard use of Fort Funston and the Palace of Fine Arts.
- Deed granting the United States perpetual access over roads in the Palace of Fine Arts tract, with a reciprocal deed, adopted.
- City executes a deed giving the United States access rights over roads in the Palace of Fine Arts tract, passed finally.
- Board adopted a resolution removing all references to the Palace of Fine Arts from Resolution No. 8718.
- Plea to preserve the Palace of Fine Arts sent to committee
- Supervisor Lewis asked that the Palace of Fine Arts be repaired or removed, and the request was referred to committee.
- Marina Merchants Association offered contractors to rehabilitate the Palace of [name withheld] at no cost, and Supervisor Mancuso suggested committee study.
- Resolution adopted asking the Mayor to appoint a citizens' committee to plan Palace of [name withheld] repairs at no city cost.
- Mayor vetoed a resolution asking for a citizens' committee to rehabilitate the Palace of [name withheld]; override vote pending.
- Mayor vetoed a resolution asking him to appoint a Palace of [name withheld] citizens' committee; consideration continued one week.
- Resolution asking the Mayor to appoint a citizens' committee for the Palace of [name withheld] was vetoed and continued to April 28.
- Board noted the Palace of [name withheld] rehabilitation committee's policy that any agreement needs Recreation and Park Commission approval.
- Board sustained the Mayor's veto of a resolution asking for a citizens' committee to rehabilitate the Palace of [name withheld].
- Halley objected, so the Board referred the request on the Palace of [name withheld] to the Public Buildings Committee.
- City Attorney's opinion on whether the federal government could take the Palace of [name withheld] was referred to committee.
- Board backs a state bill restoring the Palace of
- A San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce program to restore the Palace of [name withheld] was referred to committee.
- The Board adopted a request that the Recreation and Park Commission start legislation to convey the Palace of [name withheld] to the State.
- Supervisor Christopher asked for a committee hearing on the Palace of [name withheld] future; the request was referred to committee.
- Request that the Recreation and Park Commission report on whether the Palace of [name withheld] will be rehabilitated or demolished was granted.
- Resolution urging state law to acquire and maintain the Palace of [name withheld] as a state park was referred to committee.
- The Board adopted, as amended, a resolution urging state legislation to acquire and repair the Palace of [name withheld] as a state park.
- A resolution endorsing state bill AB 313 on rehabilitating the Palace of [name withheld]; the outcome is not shown on this page.
- Board referred proposals to rehabilitate or demolish the Palace of [name withheld] to the Recreation and Park Committee.
- A proposal to raze the Palace of [name withheld] was referred to the Public Buildings committee.
- An emergency $4,250 appropriation for temporary firehouse quarters at Palace of [name withheld] was sent to Finance Committee.
- The Board finally passed an emergency ordinance appropriating $4,250 for temporary Fire Department quarters during rebuilding at 2239 Greenwich Street.
- Supervisor Rolph's request urging the Governor to sign AB 1400 for Palace of [name withheld] rehabilitation was referred to committee.
- Board adopted a letter urging Governor Knight to sign AB 1400, state aid for rehabilitating the Palace of [name withheld].
- Recreation and Park Commission's plan to transfer Palace of [name withheld] to the State and seek a bond issue is pending.
- Title to the Palace of [name withheld] area was referred to the County, State and National Affairs Committee.
- Public necessity declared for additions and reconstruction of the Palace of [name withheld], a cost too large for ordinary city income.
- Proposed $3.6M bond to rehabilitate the Palace of [name withheld] was tabled, keeping it off the 1958 ballot.
- Proposes a November 4, 1958 bond election on $22.15M for a courthouse, City Hall work, and $3.6M for the Palace of [name withheld].
- Consideration of legal action to remove use restrictions on the Palace of [name withheld] was continued for one week.
- City authorized legal action to remove restrictions on how the Palace of [name withheld] area may be used; resolution adopted.
- Supervisor Dobbs proposed accepting a $2,000,000 gift from [name withheld] for the Palace of [name withheld]; referred to Finance Committee.
- Supervisor Blake's request to name the lake at the Palace of [name withheld] after [name withheld] was referred to the Recreation and Park Commission.
- [name withheld] offers $2M to rebuild the Palace of
- Resolution thanking [name withheld] for his gift toward restoring the Palace of [name withheld] was adopted.
- The Board accepted a $2,000,000 gift from [name withheld] to help restore the Palace of [name withheld].
- Civic Auditorium and Palace of [name withheld] bonds sent to voters
- Palace of [name withheld] deed and lease sent to committee.
- Palace of [name withheld] deed and lease sent back to committee
- $1.8 million for Palace of [name withheld] rebuild sent back to committee
- $1.8 million Palace of [name withheld] rebuild put on hold.
- Board passed a $1,800,000 appropriation from the 1959 bond fund to rebuild the Palace of [name withheld].
- The Board finally passed an ordinance conveying the Palace of [name withheld] to the State, with a lease back to the city for repairs.
- $1.8 million to rebuild Palace of [name withheld] moves ahead.
- Palace of [name withheld] transfer to state moves ahead.
- Palace of [name withheld] plan costs questioned before the bond issue
- The Board adopted a resolution approving final plans to reconstruct the Palace of [name withheld], following the [name withheld] Plan.
- Motion to add ornamentation to main building turned down
- [name withheld] request to restore tennis facilities at the Palace of [name withheld] was referred to committee.
- Board adopted a second amendment to the State agreement for repair and rehabilitation of the Palace of [name withheld].
- The Board granted Supervisor Blake's request that Public Works submit revised plans for restoring the Palace of [name withheld].
- Supervisor Blake asked Public Works to submit revised plans for rehabilitating the Palace of [name withheld]; outcome continues next page.
- Supervisor Tinney asked the Mayor to convene an urgent conference on salvaging the Palace of [name withheld] reconstruction project.
- Palace of [name withheld] restoration deadline pushed to July 1964
- Ferdon asked the Education, Parks and Recreation Committee to report back on the city's Palace of [name withheld] contract with the State.
- Committee recommends a third amendment to the lease for repairing the Palace of [name withheld]; the vote appears on the next page.
- The Board adopted the city budget for 1964-1965 after a public hearing, with the Palace of [name withheld] reconstruction funding debated.
- Budget adds toward Palace of [name withheld] rebuild
- Budget adds $850,000 toward Palace of [name withheld] rebuild
- $750,000 private gifts accepted to restore Palace of
- City adds more money to repair Palace of
- $1.8 million bonds approved for Palace of
- A charter amendment adding Section 51.5 on the Palace of [name withheld] was referred to the Rules Committee.
- Plan for a Palace of [name withheld] commission put off a week
- Relatives must contribute to welfare recipients' support
- Board refused to submit to voters a charter amendment creating a Palace of Fine Arts Commission.
- Supervisor Tinney's charter amendment to create a Palace of Fine Arts Commission was referred to the Legislative and Personnel Committee.
- Proposed charter amendment creating a Palace of Fine Arts Commission was continued to September 6, 1966.
- Palace of [name withheld] plan amended to allow non-resident members
- Palace of [name withheld] arts-centre plan sent to voters
- City's ballot argument for Palace of [name withheld] commission approved
- Supervisor Blake asked the Recreation and Park Department to resume night lighting at the Palace of [name withheld], and the request was granted.
- Supervisor Blake's request that the Recreation and Park Department improve the Palace of [name withheld] grounds and fountain was granted without objection.
- City approved talks to take over Palace of [name withheld] from state
- A sculpture and fountain offered by [name withheld] for the Palace of [name withheld] was referred to Finance Committee.
- Offer of a sculpture and fountain as a gift for the Palace of [name withheld] was referred to committee.
- Concession agreement for an Exploratorium of Science in the Palace of [name withheld] passed on first reading.
- Science museum deal for Palace of [name withheld] approved
- Mayor requested legislation accepting a $250,000 gift from [name withheld] for a Palace of [name withheld] theatre.
- A $250,000 gift from [name withheld] for a little theatre in the Palace of [name withheld] is before the Board.
- $250,000 gift accepted for a theater at Palace of
- Palace theatre vote put off to Aug 31, pending film festival income.
- Palace of [name withheld] theatre money postponed to Aug 31.
- Recreation and Park Department $13,000 Little Theater at Palace of [name withheld] was continued to August 31, 1970.
- Parks department told to report theatre cost and festival income
- Parks department asked to explain Palace of [name withheld] theatre money
- Palace of [name withheld] theatre money cut, then sent to committee.
- Palace of [name withheld] theatre money sent to committee for [name withheld] 2.
- Extra $5,000 for theatre contingencies proposed; sent to committee.
- Board passed on first reading, as amended to $6,700, funds for a Little Theatre at the Palace of [name withheld].
- Board passed $6,700 from Recreation and Park to build a Little Theatre in the Palace of [name withheld].
- Proposed deal to run Exploratorium science museum in Palace of [name withheld].
- Exploratorium deal to run science museum in Palace of [name withheld] approved
- City accepts carpet gift for Palace of Fine Arts Little Theater
- City accepts state deed for Palace of [name withheld] parkland
- Palace of [name withheld] gets a donated heating system, installed
- Nonprofit league's Palace of [name withheld] concession deal passed a first vote.
- Proposal: nonprofit league to run concessions at Palace of [name withheld].
- Palace of [name withheld] concession contract; vote not shown.
- Gift of $6,000 for engineering checks on Palace of [name withheld] work.
- Accepts $6,000 gift for engineering checks at Palace of [name withheld].
- Palace of [name withheld] colonnade restoration advances; final vote needed.
- Money to restore Palace of [name withheld] colonnades proposed.
- $15,700 approved to restore Palace of [name withheld] colonnades
- Chamber of Commerce gift to repair exterior lights at the Palace of [name withheld] was accepted for Recreation and Park use.
- Palace of [name withheld] proposed as city landmark; first vote only.
- Palace of [name withheld] made a city landmark
- Palace of Fine Arts Theater gets a donated stage rigging upgrade
- Passed for second reading $20,000 for structural roof repairs at the Palace of [name withheld].
- $20,000 was approved for structural roof repairs at the Palace of [name withheld], finally passed by the Board.
- A lease of part of the Palace of [name withheld] for a Museum of Science and Human Perception passed for second reading.
- Ordinance approving a lease of part of the [name withheld] Building to the Palace of Fine Arts League for theatre activities passed for second reading.
- A lease of part of the Palace of [name withheld] for theatre activities passed for second reading.
- Palace of Fine Arts League was granted a lease of part of the Palace of [name withheld] building for theatre activities.
- Palace of [name withheld] lease to Palace of Fine Arts League, Inc. for a science museum was finally passed.
- The deteriorating roof of the Palace of [name withheld] was referred to the Finance Committee for review of repair plans.
- The Exploratorium gave $785,000 to repair the roof and ceiling of the Palace of [name withheld], accepted by resolution.
- Proposal to have a private contractor maintain [name withheld] Lagoon water quality was continued to January 28, 1985.
- Resolution adopted approving private contractor maintenance of water quality at the [name withheld] Lagoon.
- Palace Drive to close for a Palace of [name withheld] premiere
- Supervisor Nelder asked Pacific Bell to consider installing a public telephone booth near the Palace of [name withheld] lake area.
- Water quality maintenance at Palace of Fine Arts Lagoon approved for a private contractor as cheaper than city staff.
- Ordinance approving a contract with the U.S. Army to supply water to the Palace of [name withheld] until October 1, 1987 was adopted.
- Ordinance approving a contract for the U.S. Army to supply water to the Palace of [name withheld] until October 1, 1987.
- Water quality maintenance at the Palace of Fine Arts Lagoon approved for a private contractor under Prop J, Resolution 423-87 adopted.
- Public Works funding of $21,400 for the Palace of [name withheld] water supply line passed for second reading.
- Board finally passed a $21,400 ordinance covering cost overage on the Palace of [name withheld] water supply line.
- Public Works' $10,489 Palace of [name withheld] flooding control project appropriation passed for second reading.
- Board finally passed a $10,489 appropriation for Palace of [name withheld] flooding control work.
- Supervisor Newsom requested a hearing on the Palace of [name withheld], sent to the Parks and Recreation Committee.
- Resolution urges the Recreation and Park Department to repair the Palace of [name withheld] rotunda and plan its long-term upkeep.
- Supervisor Newsom's committee hearing on the Palace of [name withheld] was assigned, with no outcome yet.
- Parks committee filed a hearing on the Palace of [name withheld] at the request of Supervisor Newsom.
- Resolution urging the Recreation and Parks Department to repair the Palace of [name withheld] rotunda and plan its long-term upkeep was referred to committee.
- Recreation and Park Department grants of $3,644,500 in state funds for Sunnyside Conservatory, Lake Merced pier and Palace of [name withheld] were sent to committee.
- State grants totalling $3,644,500 for Sunnyside Conservatory, Lake Merced fishing pier and Palace of [name withheld] were sent to the Parks Committee.
- Parks department may accept and spend a $100,000 State Coastal Conservancy grant for improvements at India Basin Open Space.
- Recreation and Park may accept and spend $3.6M in state grants for Sunnyside Conservatory, Lake Merced pier and Palace of [name withheld].
- Supervisor Newsom requested a hearing on the renovation and seismic retrofitting of the Palace of [name withheld]; referred to the Neighborhood Services and Parks Committee.
- Supervisor Newsom requested a hearing on the renovation and seismic retrofitting of the Palace of [name withheld]; referred to committee.
- Proposed resolution expresses intent that the Palace of [name withheld] theatre stay open to artists and community groups; referred for adoption.
- Supervisors Hall and Peskin proposed a resolution urging the Palace of [name withheld] theatre remain open to artists and community groups; referred for adoption at the next meeting.
- Proposal that the Palace of [name withheld] theatre stay open to artists and community groups was referred to committee.
- Proposed resolution urging the Palace of [name withheld] theatre stay open to artists and community groups was referred to committee.
- Hearing on the Palace of [name withheld] renovation and seismic retrofit was reactivated and sent to the Neighborhood Services and Recreation Committee.
- Resolution accepting a gift of up to $16,000,000 from the Maybeck Foundation for Palace of [name withheld] improvements was referred for adoption.
- Resolution to accept and spend a gift of up to $16,000,000 from the Maybeck Foundation for Palace of [name withheld] improvements was referred to the Board.
- A $1,451,250 state grant to restore the Palace of [name withheld] was sent to the City Operations committee.
- Recreation and Park Department may accept and spend a $1.45M state grant to restore the Palace of [name withheld].
- Recreation and Park Department may accept and spend a $1,451,250 state grant to restore the Palace of [name withheld]; referred to committee.
- $1.45 million state grant to restore Palace of [name withheld] approved
- $500,000 state grant funds Palace of [name withheld] park improvements.
- $500,000 state grant funds Palace of [name withheld] park improvements.
- Plan to protect Palace of [name withheld] swans proposed.
- Swan protection plan at Palace of [name withheld] sent to committee.
- Resolution endorsing swans at the Palace of [name withheld] lagoon and urging a protection plan was sent to committee.
- Up to $1M grant for Palace of [name withheld] parking approved.
- The Recreation and Park Department proposed accepting and spending a grant of up to $1,000,000 for Palace of [name withheld] parking mitigation.
- Up to $1 million grant for Palace of [name withheld] parking fixes