Qipudata
San Francisco · v0.7.1
qipu data›San Francisco›Places›Bay Bridge West spans

Bay Bridge West spans

Named in the records1959–2000

31 records of San Francisco tie this place, 1959–2000: 0 decisions of the Board of Supervisors and 31 facts read from city reports. Open the full list, with filters for years, kind and outcome.

Kind
Named in the records
Records
31: 0 Board decisions, 31 facts from city reports
Years
1959–2000

What the records say

All 31 records, in date order. The one-line summaries were written by a language model from the printed page; open the page to check the wording.

WhenWhat the record saysOutcomeSource
1959Bay Bridge west spans · event: Rail on the west spanseventCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
1965Bay Bridge west spans · other: Lane load derived from 1965/67 Caltrans study placing live load from all 10 lanesfindingCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
1965Bay Bridge west spans · finding: West span structural demands under proposed lane and rail loads established by proportioning 1965/67 valuesfindingCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge West spans · other: 3/4-inch epoxy overlay installed by CaltransbuildingCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000BART rail option on Bay Bridge West spans · other: Total added load per rail, BARTmeasureCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge west spans · finding: Demands on some structural components reported higher than actual impacts because train lengths are much less than spanfindingCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge West spans · other: post-retrofit West spans studied for rail impactsprojectCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge West span superstructure · finding: worst case: strength of only a few members increased by 12%, remainder by less or not at allfindingCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge rail feasibility study: below deck option · alternative: Adds two lanes to the bridge below the current lower deckalternativeCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge rail feasibility study: rail service on the bridge deck · other: If two directions of rail service are placed on the bridge deck, a minimum of three traffic lanes would be displacedfindingCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge West Span rail · other: Adding 34 feet of deck is the minimum width for bi-directional train operationprojectCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge West spans · other: current lane width of 11'7"findingCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge West spans rail alignment · other: place track outside the West spans to keep five lanes together in each directionrecommendationCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge rail service · finding: No rail services would travel at high speeds over the bridge, particularly over the West spansfindingCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge rail feasibility - west spans rail options · alternative: three viable options: adding lanes below deck, alongside lower deck, alongside upper deckalternativeCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge below deck rail option · proposes: adds two lanes below the current lower deckalternativeCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge rail feasibility study · other: Adding 34 feet of deck is the minimum width required for bi-directional train operation on the West spansfindingCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge West spans seismic strengthening · other: Strengthening of the West spans is already underwayprojectCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge West spans · cost usd: values of $2,000 per square foot are appropriatemeasureCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge West spans · cost usd: over $1 billion in investment on that span alonemeasureCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge rail feasibility study · other: Seismically retrofitted West spans considered for the studyprojectCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge west spans structural improvements · cost usd: as high as $3 BillionmeasureCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge west spans · finding: West spans retrofitted but not replaced under the current planfindingCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge West Spans rail · alternative: Rail suspended below the current lower deckalternativeCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge West Spans · finding: None of the rail alternatives is considered infeasiblefindingCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge West Spans main cable · finding: Strengthening of main cable anticipated; two new main suspension cables or new tower legs neededfindingCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge West Spans seismic · finding: Seismic improvements beyond the current retrofit would be necessaryfindingCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000[name withheld] option on Bay Bridge West spans · other: Total added load per rail, [name withheld]measureCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000[name withheld] (SEPTA) option on Bay Bridge West spans · other: Total added load per rail, [name withheld] (SEPTA)measureCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000[name withheld] (Amtrak) option on Bay Bridge West spans · other: Total added load per rail, [name withheld] (Amtrak)measureCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗
2000Bay Bridge west spans rail load · other: Total added load per rail: BART 13,560; [name withheld] 14,000; [name withheld] (SEPTA) 14,660; [name withheld] (Amtrak) 14,820findingCity report: Bay Bridge rail feasibility study
scanned page ↗

All 31 records, with filters · this place's data as JSON · release v0.7.1 · CC0 1.0