Qipudata
San Francisco · v0.7.1
qipu data›San Francisco›Places›de Young Museum site

de Young Museum site

Named in the records1906–2002

71 records of San Francisco tie this place, 1906–2002: 0 decisions of the Board of Supervisors and 71 facts read from city reports. Open the full list, with filters for years, kind and outcome.

Kind
Named in the records
Records
71: 0 Board decisions, 71 facts from city reports
Years
1906–2002

What the records say

The 60 most telling of its 71 records, in date order: the ones an editor picked first, then the highest scored. The one-line summaries were written by a language model from the printed page; open the page to check the wording.

WhenWhat the record saysOutcomeSource
1906M.[name withheld] site (Broadway @ Waterfront) · finding: fill largely predates the 1906 earthquake and consists mostly of clean sandsfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997De Young Museum site option near Port area · finding: Port Commission key to approval; historic district may involve Landmarks BoardfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site, first alternative (unnamed on page) · finding: Good site to build on: well drained soil, direct truck access, open cut excavation, low water tablesiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site, second alternative (unnamed on page) · finding: Fair site to build on: contaminated soil, thin layer of bay mud, downtown restrictions on deliveries and noisesiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site, third alternative (unnamed on page) · finding: Difficult site to build on: contaminated soil, thick layer of bay mud, downtown restrictions on deliveries and noise, cross lot bracing, high water tablesiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New De Young Museum site restudy · finding: With rail station, up to six months for asbestos abatement, demolition, and removal of contaminated soil; without rail station, up to eight monthsfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New De Young Museum site restudy · finding: Redevelopment could gain jurisdiction; otherwise city-owned land needs standard approvalsfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997M.[name withheld] site (Broadway @ Waterfront) · finding: groundmotion expected to be high in a major earthquakefindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site restudy · finding: Closest site to BART, ferry, and Muni Metro stationsfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site selection restudy · alternative: Old Federal Building in the Civic CenteralternativeCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site restudy · finding: Only four local, no regional transit lines nearby; limited parking supplyfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site restudy · finding: Long walk from most transit; limited parking nearbyfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site restudy · finding: Best local, regional bus access; good parking supplyfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site restudy · finding: Good ambient light; trees at north, moming fog banksfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site restudy · finding: Historic site; natural setting; diversity of park users; building design limitationsfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site restudy · finding: Highly compatible physical setting; highly incompatible functional settingfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site restudy · finding: Sculpture garden could abut museum in park-like setting; sporadic wind and glarefindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site restudy · finding: Good southern exposure; existing and potential surrounding skyscrapersfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site restudy · finding: Limited direct sunlight in winter; open to eastfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site, second alternative (unnamed on page) · finding: Adequate services and nearby steam; liquefaction risk; potential relocations; abandoned pump stationsiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site, third alternative (unnamed on page) · other: Lands on seawall parcel to the north could be used for parking; other outparcels may become availablesiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site selection restudy · alternative: Existing de Young Museum site in Golden Gate ParkalternativeCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site selection restudy · alternative: Letterman Hospital site in the PresidioalternativeCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site selection restudy · alternative: Transbay District sitesalternativeCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site selection restudy · alternative: Ferry BuildingalternativeCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site selection restudy · alternative: Mid-Embarcadero Blocks 202 and 203alternativeCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site selection restudy · alternative: Site at the terminus of Broadway at the EmbarcaderoalternativeCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site selection restudy · finding: Seven sites or site groups determined to be preliminary feasiblefindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site alternative (not named on this page) · cost usd: $3,000,000 below grade with station; $4,900,000 below grade without stationalternativeCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site alternative (not named on this page) · cost usd: $4,600,000 below grade and $100,000 in existing structuresalternativeCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site alternative (not named on this page) · cost usd: $100,000 below grade and $2,500,000 in existing structuresalternativeCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site alternative (not named on this page) · finding: 1/3 mile from Station 13; direct travel pathfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site alternative (not named on this page) · finding: 1/2 mile from northeast station; could encounter congestionfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site alternative (not named on this page) · finding: Excellent security enhanced by adjacent sites and private personnelfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site alternative (not named on this page) · finding: Private loading facility; arterial approach from all directionsfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site alternative (not named on this page) · finding: 2/3 mi. from Station 31; uncongested travel pathfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New De Young Museum site restudy · cost usd: best case zero, worst case $20.6 millionfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997de [name withheld] site selection - Golden Gate Park site · finding: All four sites are served by adequate utilities to provide fully operational electrical, fire protection, and life safety systemsfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997de [name withheld] site selection evaluation · other: 45 evaluation criteria used to compare alternative sitesprojectCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997de [name withheld] site selection evaluation · other: 150 measures (factors) listed to gain insight into each siteprojectCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997New de Young Museum site restudy · finding: Pleasant tranquil setting; near [name withheld] area and Walton Square ParkfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997de [name withheld] · proposes: 150,000 s.f. footprintmeasureCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997de [name withheld] · floor area sqft: Total Museum Program 255,750 sq ftbuildingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997de [name withheld] · floor area sqft: Total Building Area 601,000 sq ftbuildingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997de [name withheld] parking · floor area sqft: Level 2 parking 150,000 s.f. 425 carsbuildingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997de [name withheld] basement program · floor area sqft: 104,750 sf (gross), includes 75 carsbuildingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997M.[name withheld] site (Broadway @ Waterfront) · other: Two existing one- and two-story buildings presently exist on the sitebuildingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997M.[name withheld] site (Broadway @ Waterfront) · other: Embarcadero Freeway ramp structure traversed the site; abandoned pile and pile cap foundations remain undergroundsiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997M.[name withheld] site (Broadway @ Waterfront) · finding: upper portions of the fill may contain regulated (contaminated) materialsfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997M.[name withheld] site (Broadway @ Waterfront) · finding: site is outside the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone; ground rupture potential is lowfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997M.[name withheld] site (Broadway @ Waterfront) · finding: potential for compaction settlement and liquefaction of the fill is highfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997-05-16New de Young Museum site · finding: Horizontal ground motion accelerations expected at site in major earthquake range 0.35-0.6gfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997-05-16New de Young Museum site restudy · finding: No constraints other than possible height limits affect construction of above-ground structures; mid-rise may be needed due to small site footprintfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997-05-16New de Young Museum site · finding: Conventional building horizontal accelerations expected to exceed 1.0g at third floor and abovefindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997-05-16New de Young Museum · recommendation: Higher floors not used for art storage and display, or supplemental damping or seismic isolator bearings at ground levelrecommendationCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997-05-16New de Young Museum site restudy · finding: Expected horizontal accelerations 0.35-0.55g at first floor, 0.75-0.9g at second floor, greater than 1.25g at third floor and higherfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997-05-16New de Young Museum site restudy · recommendation: Higher levels should not be used for art storage or display, or use structural response modification (isolation and/or supplemental damping) if taller than two storiesrecommendationCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997-05-16New de Young Museum site restudy · finding: Dewatering with wellpoints is not an option on this site due to potential settlement of adjacent improvementsfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997-05-16New de Young Museum site restudy · recommendation: Tiebacks cannot be used for shoring; excavation must be bracedrecommendationCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
2002de [name withheld] site selection study · other: Projection horizon of five years from now, when construction of the new museum building is expected to commenceprojectCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗

All 71 records, with filters · this place's data as JSON · release v0.7.1 · CC0 1.0