Qipudata
San Francisco · v0.7.1
qipu data›San Francisco›Places›Golden Gate Park Site

Golden Gate Park Site

Named in the records1926–1997

63 records of San Francisco tie this place, 1926–1997: 2 decisions of the Board of Supervisors and 61 facts read from city reports. Open the full list, with filters for years, kind and outcome.

Kind
Named in the records
Records
63: 2 Board decisions, 61 facts from city reports
Years
1926–1997

What the records say

The 60 most telling of its 63 records, in date order: the ones an editor picked first, then the highest scored. The one-line summaries were written by a language model from the printed page; open the page to check the wording.

WhenWhat the record saysOutcomeSource
1926-09-20A proposed charter amendment on placing art in public places was withdrawn after a Golden Gate Park site was promised.withdrawnBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1951-09-04Supervisor Christopher's resolution urging a Golden Gate Park site for model airplanes was referred to the Education, Parks and Recreation Committee.referredBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1995Golden Gate Park site · other: 405 reported major offenses in statistical subarea 757, Richmond Police DistrictfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · finding: Adjacent uses are residential and recreational; residential areas predominantly built outfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · finding: Residential areas predominantly built out, mostly single-family dwellings, except some apartments on Fulton StreetfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park Site · other: Up to one year for museum relocation, asbestos abatement, and building demolitionfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park Site · cost usd: Clearing & demolition $1,400,000measureCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park Site (M.[name withheld]) · finding: High potential for compaction settlement in a major earthquake due to loose to medium dense sands in upper 10-15 feetfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park Site (M.[name withheld]) · finding: Nearest expected earthquake source is San Andreas fault, some 5 miles southwest of the sitefindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997M.[name withheld] Golden Gate Park Site · finding: Good site to build on: well drained soil, direct truck access, open cut excavation, low water tablefindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · finding: no regional transit access; only two Muni lines within one quarter milefindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · other: approximately one-half mile from a Muni Metro (N line) stopfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · finding: ranked #4 of four sites; scored notably lower overall in public security, public accessibility, transit access, parking accessfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · finding: ranked highest overall in operations because it is closest to the Palace of the Legion of HonorfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · finding: ranked best in ventilation cost, adjacent open space, and ease of constructionfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · finding: Security has been an issue at this site, particularly during nighttime hours, due to the secluded nature of the park.findingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · other: Site remains confined to preexisting footprint, including Asian Art Museum's, which will be movingsiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · other: Potential conflict with natural setting limits design expression, including verticalitysiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · finding: Very serious functional conflict between growing museum and growing demand for park and recreational escapefindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · finding: Controversy over visitor parking need and limited access from weekend closures of Kennedy DrivefindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · finding: Large enough for museum footprint and sculpture gardenfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · finding: Noise, wind and glare are minimalfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park Site · cost usd: $100,000 below gradesiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park Site · cost usd: $4,000,000 in existing structuressiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997De Young Museum Golden Gate Park site · finding: will have cleaner air for recirculation since it is outside of the downtown zone of air pollutionfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park Site · floor area sqft: Museum footprint 136,000 sfsiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park Site · cost usd: TOTAL $16,100,000findingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Remove asbestos and lead paint · cost usd: Remove asbestos and lead paint in structures $4,000,000 at Golden Gate Park SitemeasureCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Remove contaminated soil · cost usd: Remove contaminated soil $100,000 (localized area) at Golden Gate Park SitemeasureCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · finding: Pedestrian access is safe and a pleasant experience; not served by a designated pedestrian streetfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · finding: Less affected by weekday traffic than downtown sitesfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Kennedy Drive · finding: Formally designated bicycle route in vicinity of Golden Gate Park sitefindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · other: could not accommodate even 500 additional parking spaces on a weekday or weekendfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · finding: could not accommodate even 500 spaces on a weekday or weekendfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · other: no hotel rooms within a one-half mile radiusfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · other: 119 hotel rooms within a one-mile radiusfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997DeYoung Museum downtown site vs Golden Gate Park site · other: Downtown sites expected to increase share of persons using public transit, slight increase in City revenuesfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997DeYoung Museum downtown site vs Golden Gate Park site · other: Downtown site projected to generate approximately 38,000 more transit riders annually than a Golden Gate Park sitefindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · finding: New Golden Gate Park Plan and EIR rejects museum's symbiosisfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park Site · other: five to ten feet of medium dense silty sand with brick fragments and debris, believed artificially placedsiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park Site · other: existing underground foundation and utility structures connected with existing museum buildingssiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · finding: No specific utility investigations were made at this sitesiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · finding: physically compatible with park surroundings but functional compatibility conflicts from parking demand and Sunday and holiday closures of Kennedy DrivesiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997deYoung Museum site · other: All sites have reasonably good to excellent location with respect to the nearest fire stationfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · other: Access to Golden Gate Park site considered at least as good as the three downtown sites, probably slightly betterfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · other: Accessible via Kennedy Drive and Tea Garden Drive; service road off Kennedy DrivemeasureCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997de [name withheld] site selection - Golden Gate Park site · finding: All four sites are served by adequate utilities to provide fully operational electrical, fire protection, and life safety systemsfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · other: Fulton Street is the only [name withheld] in the vicinitysiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park Site · use: occupied by current M.[name withheld] and Asian Art MuseumssiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park Site (M.[name withheld]) · other: Soil profile classification S1 (UBC)siteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park Site (M.[name withheld]) · finding: Spread footings in dense sand below basement levels; excavation can use conventional equipment and shoringfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park Site (M.[name withheld]) · finding: Potential for hazardous materials on site is lowfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park Site (M.[name withheld]) · other: Groundwater not encountered to exploration depth of about 40 feetsiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park Site (M.[name withheld]) · other: Bedrock estimated at depth between 150 and 200 feetsiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park Site (M.[name withheld]) · finding: Potential for ground rupture due to fault displacement is low; site outside Alquist-Priolo Special Studies ZonefindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park Site (M.[name withheld]) · finding: Expected ground shaking at 0.4-0.6g at first floor level for two-story buildingfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park Site (M.[name withheld]) · finding: Expected ground shaking at 1.4-1.5g at third floor/roof levelfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park Site (M.[name withheld]) · finding: Site poses no significant restrictions to superstructure; main concern is strong seismic ground shakingfindingCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · finding: Severe seismic shaking; shallow foundations; conventional excavation supportsiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗
1997Golden Gate Park site · finding: Adequate existing services; liquefaction risk to off-site servicessiteCity report: M.H. deYoung Memorial Museum site selection study
scanned page ↗

All 63 records, with filters · this place's data as JSON · release v0.7.1 · CC0 1.0