Qipudata
San Francisco · v0.7.1
qipu data›San Francisco›Places›Major New Site at Mission Bay

Major New Site at Mission Bay

Named in the records1990–2010

110 records of San Francisco tie this place, 1990–2010: 0 decisions of the Board of Supervisors and 110 facts read from city reports. Open the full list, with filters for years, kind and outcome.

Kind
Named in the records
Records
110: 0 Board decisions, 110 facts from city reports
Years
1990–2010

What the records say

The 60 most telling of its 110 records, in date order: the ones an editor picked first, then the highest scored. The one-line summaries were written by a language model from the printed page; open the page to check the wording.

WhenWhat the record saysOutcomeSource
1990[name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Elimination of existing pollution-generating activities at Mission Bay; surface runoff quality expected to improve; impact not significantfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1994UCSF [name withheld], Mission Bay · finding: No sensitive plant or wildlife species are known to exist on the sitesiteCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1995UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay · other: Total LRDP water use approximately 0.58 mgd, an increase of 0.6 percent over 1995 annual use in San FranciscofindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Part of Mission Bay is below six feet mean sea level and certain areas would be subject to flooding without mitigating site designfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996Impact 12H4-4 Tidal Flooding, [name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Tidal flooding impact is significant for the projectfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · other: Adds about 3,390 person-trips per day to MUNI lines serving Mission BayfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Increase in MUNI ridership: less than significant impactfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay · other: about 3,390 person-trips per day added to MUNI linesfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · proposes: Illustrative Site Plan shows potential UCSF development within Subareas West and East of Third StreetprojectCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Compatible with existing land use in the areafindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Consistent with Mission Bay Plan goalsfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · other: Changes existing site character from industrial to research campus usesfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · other: 18,400 external person-trips on a weekdaymeasureCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · other: 10,820 daily vehicle-tripsmeasureCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · other: 1,730 vehicle trips in the am peak hourmeasureCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · other: about 1,620 vehicle trips in the pm peak hourmeasureCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay · other: peak parking demand about 4,200 spacesprojectCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay · other: up to 1,580 pedestrian/bicycle trips per dayprojectCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay transit service · finding: impacts on transit service not expected to be significantfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Net new vehicle trips would generate criteria air pollutants in excess of the BAAQMD 80 lb/day threshold (Less Than Significant)findingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: 67 lb/day of ROG would meet the thresholdfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: 98 lb/day of NOx and 206 lb/day of PM10 would exceed BAAQMD significance thresholdsfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Mitigation Measure 12D4-2 (Significant/Unavoidable): TDM measures would not reduce trips below the 80 lb/day thresholdfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay · recommendation: Expand the UCSF shuttle system to include the [name withheld] (TDM measure)recommendationCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Most significant noise source is vehicular traffic on roadway network including Townsend Street, I-280, 16th Street, Mariposa Street and Third StreetfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Area adjoining Townsend Street and Seventh Street is affected by CalTrain trains arriving and departingfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Construction workers could be exposed to contaminated soil or groundwater if pre-construction remediation is not completed; significant impactfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay stormwater · finding: Stormwater runoff from Mission Bay would be treated at the Southeast Water Pollution Control PlantfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay stormwater overflows · finding: Overflows of untreated stormwater and sewage may occur along the city's shore into San Francisco Bay; impact significantfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay erosion and sedimentation · recommendation: Implement Development Scenario Mitigation Measure 12H1-1recommendationCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Measures in place would remediate existing groundwater contamination and avoid further contamination; impact less than significantfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay · proposes: No use of groundwater at the [name withheld]projectCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Surface runoff: no net increase in stormwater runoff expected; impact not substantially changedfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay · recommendation: Mitigation Measure 12H4-2: less than significant, none requiredfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: No portions of Mission Bay lie within the 100-year floodplain, but portions may lie beneath the 100-year high tide elevationfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay (UCSF) · recommendation: UCSF would protect low-lying areas from sea level rise through setbacks, increased elevation and other methods in the Mission Bay Design GuidelinesrecommendationCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld], Mission Bay · other: Urban setting developed for industrial uses (rail yards, truck terminals, warehouses, maritime); much of the area is vacantsiteCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Pickleweed is an indicator species for northern coastal salt marsh, a sensitive habitatfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Northern coastal salt marsh habitat is not sufficiently developed at Mission Bay to support the salt marsh harvest mousefindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Pacific herring spawn near the Bay shoreline at the mouth of the channel, December through MarchfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Neither CNDDB nor the Mission Bay FEIR identified sensitive habitat or sensitive species within the Mission Bay planning areafindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Development would not endanger or damage sensitive species and sensitive habitat; not a significant impactfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Development avoiding sensitive habitat along Mission Creek would be less than significantfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · recommendation: Mitigation Measure 1214-1 (Less Than Significant): none requiredrecommendationCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · other: increase water demand by 0.51 mgd, 0.56 percent of San Francisco's existing use of 90 mgdprojectCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay · other: water demand increaseprojectCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: water supply impact less than significantfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Southeast Plant dry-weather flow increase 0.46 mgd, not significantfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: wastewater impact not significantfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · proposes: could be located at any site or combination of sites within the Mission Bay plan areaprojectCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · alternative: potential site in the southeastern area of Mission Bay, shown on Figure 2-8siteCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Alteration of existing views would be less than significantfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · height ft: about 110 feetprojectCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · height ft: buildings up to 75 feet in heightmeasureCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · height ft: new development over 45 feet would obstruct views of Potrero Hill from across the bayfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: would not have a significant visual effectfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: would not be expected to limit use of open space substantiallyfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996[name withheld] at Mission Bay (UCSF LRDP) · finding: new shade from the [name withheld] at Mission Bay would not be considered significantfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF LRDP [name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: areas of potential historical archaeological resources from the 19th centuryfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗
1996UCSF [name withheld] at Mission Bay · finding: Significant impact on historic archaeological resources during constructionfindingCity report: Draft EIR : long range development plan, University of California, San Francisco
scanned page ↗

All 110 records, with filters · this place's data as JSON · release v0.7.1 · CC0 1.0