San Francisco Probation Department
Named in the records1965–1987
59 records of San Francisco tie this place, 1965–1987: 0 decisions of the Board of Supervisors and 59 facts read from city reports. Open the full list, with filters for years, kind and outcome.
- Kind
- Named in the records
- Records
- 59: 0 Board decisions, 59 facts from city reports
- Years
- 1965–1987
What the records say
All 59 records, in date order. The one-line summaries were written by a language model from the printed page; open the page to check the wording.
| When | What the record says | Outcome | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1965 | San Francisco Probation Department Placement Division · other: number of delinquent boys and girls in placement increased 62 percent in first year of operation | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1966 | San Francisco Probation Department Placement Division · other: placements increased to a monthly average of 301 | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1967 | San Francisco Probation Department field supervision · other: 5,006 cases afforded field supervision | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1967 | San Francisco Probation Department field supervision caseload · other: Almost 51 percent of field supervision cases in nondelinquent dependency category | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department · finding: 68.7 percent of probation officers reported communication problems within the Probation Department | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department · other: 144 employees of the Probation Department | agency | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | Boy Intake Unit, San Francisco Probation Department · finding: 8 to 24 hour delay in receiving police reports | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department, police incident reports · finding: probation officer had police report in only 27 of 132 cases (20 percent) | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department intake · finding: police report generally not available to the probation officer when detention decision is made | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department · other: separate juvenile and adult probation departments (one of only two California counties with separate departments) | agency | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department professional staff · finding: Social work was the most frequently reported prior employment experience, 58.1 percent of responses | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department professional staff · finding: Previous employment as a juvenile hall counselor was the next most common response, 36.5 percent of responses | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department · finding: Changes in court policies and procedures: 56.7 percent of probation officers judged this change needed | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department · finding: Upgrading quality of staff: 56.7 percent of probation officers judged this change needed | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department · finding: Increased salaries for Probation Department staff: 49.2 percent of probation officers judged this change needed | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco probation department · other: 118 cases per officer (highest workload among six counties, tied with Alameda) | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | Probation case records, San Francisco Probation Department · finding: Case records not feasible for measuring effectiveness of probation supervision | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department · other: average length of probation supervision 15.3 months | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department · finding: Eighty-one percent of probation officers report communication problems with other agencies | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department · finding: Half (50.7 percent) of probation officers believed changes in relationships with other agencies would improve services to clients | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department boys' camp program · other: counselor follow-up supervision in the community for the first six months after return from camp | measure | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department · other: operates three institutions | agency | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department girls' home · proposes: possibility of building a girls' home | project | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department · other: 17 of the 23 respondents had been employees of the Probation Department for five years or more | agency | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | Boys' camp professional staff (San Francisco Probation Department) · finding: 8 of the 23 respondents had held their present positions less than six months | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department boys' ranches · finding: two of the 23 professional employees | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department boys' ranches · finding: about one-third of the professional employees encouraged to pursue additional formal education | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department reimbursement for remote-area transportation · other: Reimbursement provision in sections 16.94 - 16.96 of the Administrative Code | event | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department · finding: has not worked out written agreements with the Child Welfare Service | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | Probation Department community support survey · finding: Only 6 of the 16 answered yes; 8 answered no on community support in line with other County departments | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department · finding: does not have a multi-stratified series of probation officer classifications; has only entry probation officer and an ill-defined senior probation officer position | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department staff interviewed · other: 74 staff persons interviewed: 67 line officers and seven unit supervisors | agency | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department professional staff · other: 74 staff in table total, length of time in present position | agency | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department · finding: 59 of 74 probation officers stressed need for smaller caseloads | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department · finding: 68.6 percent of probation officers said working with clientele was the best feature of their job | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department · finding: 11.9 percent of probation officers said rendering services to clientele was the best feature of their job | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | Two boys' ranches of the San Francisco Probation Department · other: Staff distributed by type of employment prior to acceptance of present position, 1968 | site | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department boys' ranch staff · other: Staff at the two boys' ranches work six days per week, with extra reimbursement for the sixth day | measure | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department boys' ranch staff · other: Eight of 23 ranch staff members spoke a foreign language | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department · finding: No resident or day facility available for delinquent girls | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1985 | San Francisco Probation Department supervision unit · other: About 3.5 new cases were assigned to the department every day during 1985 | finding | City report: Creating a new agenda for the care and treatment of San Francisco's youthful offenders : a model program scanned page ↗ |
| 1987 | Probation department supervision classification system · recommendation: A review of a classification system as a means of assisting in the supervisory function of the probation department is warranted | recommendation | City report: Creating a new agenda for the care and treatment of San Francisco's youthful offenders : a model program scanned page ↗ |
| 1987 | Youth case file sample (San Francisco Probation Department) · other: 312 cases from which information was extracted | finding | City report: Creating a new agenda for the care and treatment of San Francisco's youthful offenders : a model program scanned page ↗ |
| 1987 | Youth case file sample (San Francisco Probation Department) · finding: Males represent 87 percent of sampled youths | finding | City report: Creating a new agenda for the care and treatment of San Francisco's youthful offenders : a model program scanned page ↗ |
| 1987 | Youth case file sample (San Francisco Probation Department) · finding: Serious personal and serious property offenses each found in greater than forty percent of cases | finding | City report: Creating a new agenda for the care and treatment of San Francisco's youthful offenders : a model program scanned page ↗ |
| 1987 | Youth case file sample (San Francisco Probation Department) · finding: Only three percent of the sample charged with a status offense | finding | City report: Creating a new agenda for the care and treatment of San Francisco's youthful offenders : a model program scanned page ↗ |
| 1987 | Youth case file sample (San Francisco Probation Department) · finding: Drugs listed as a charge for nearly sixteen percent of the population | finding | City report: Creating a new agenda for the care and treatment of San Francisco's youthful offenders : a model program scanned page ↗ |
| 1987 | San Francisco Probation Department communication · recommendation: Strengthen the current system of formal communication throughout the Department | recommendation | City report: Creating a new agenda for the care and treatment of San Francisco's youthful offenders : a model program scanned page ↗ |
| 1987 | San Francisco Probation Department staff feedback · recommendation: Chief Probation Officer should formally invite constructive criticism and critiques from staff | recommendation | City report: Creating a new agenda for the care and treatment of San Francisco's youthful offenders : a model program scanned page ↗ |
| 1987 | San Francisco Probation Department · recommendation: Develop a comprehensive training plan for the Department | recommendation | City report: Creating a new agenda for the care and treatment of San Francisco's youthful offenders : a model program scanned page ↗ |
| 1987 | San Francisco Probation Department · recommendation: Tighten hiring practices so that more capable personnel are recruited | recommendation | City report: Creating a new agenda for the care and treatment of San Francisco's youthful offenders : a model program scanned page ↗ |
| 1987 | Probation Department offices · other: offices and physical plant left much to be desired; in serious need of attention | finding | City report: Creating a new agenda for the care and treatment of San Francisco's youthful offenders : a model program scanned page ↗ |
| 1987 | San Francisco Probation Department · finding: No formal classification system results in degrees of supervision and services | finding | City report: Creating a new agenda for the care and treatment of San Francisco's youthful offenders : a model program scanned page ↗ |
| 1987 | San Francisco Probation Department · recommendation: Develop a formal classification system based on a risk prediction scale | recommendation | City report: Creating a new agenda for the care and treatment of San Francisco's youthful offenders : a model program scanned page ↗ |
| 1987 | San Francisco Probation Department · finding: Intensive probation not used and no staff conduct parent or group meetings with probationers | finding | City report: Creating a new agenda for the care and treatment of San Francisco's youthful offenders : a model program scanned page ↗ |
| 1987 | San Francisco Probation Department · recommendation: Begin training immediately on group counseling for probationers and their parents | recommendation | City report: Creating a new agenda for the care and treatment of San Francisco's youthful offenders : a model program scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | San Francisco Probation Department Placement Division · event: established a new division in January 1965 responsible for delinquent wards in out-of-home placement | finding | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1968 | Placement Division, San Francisco Probation Department · event: established a new division for out-of-home placement of delinquent wards | event | City report: The San Francisco Juvenile Court; background information for use of the Study Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1987 | San Francisco Probation Department · other: approximately 7,000 juvenile law violators referred each year | finding | City report: [Study of the San Francisco juvenile probation system] : [fact sheets] scanned page ↗ |
All 59 records, with filters · this place's data as JSON · release v0.7.1 · CC0 1.0