San Francisco unreinforced masonry buildings
Named in the records1990–1991
24 records of San Francisco tie this place, 1990–1991: 0 decisions of the Board of Supervisors and 24 facts read from city reports. Open the full list, with filters for years, kind and outcome.
- Kind
- Named in the records
- Records
- 24: 0 Board decisions, 24 facts from city reports
- Years
- 1990–1991
What the records say
All 24 records, in date order. The one-line summaries were written by a language model from the printed page; open the page to check the wording.
| When | What the record says | Outcome | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | UMB Alternative 2 retrofit of vacant buildings · other: four to six weeks minimum | alternative | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | UMB Alternative 3 retrofit of vacant buildings · other: four to 12 weeks minimum | alternative | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | UMB Alternative 2 retrofit · other: about two-thirds of UMBs would not have to be vacated completely | alternative | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | UMB Alternative 3 retrofit · other: about half of UMBs would not have to be vacated | alternative | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | UMB Alternative 1 retrofit · other: no UMBs would have to be vacated for retrofitting | alternative | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | Alternative 1 UMB seismic retrofit · other: about 10% of building space could not be occupied at a time | finding | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | Alternative 1 UMB seismic retrofit · other: 0% for industrial buildings to 40% for small-footprint, one-story commercial and residential buildings | finding | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | Alternative 2 UMB seismic retrofit · other: about one-quarter of each building not occupiable at any time | finding | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | Alternative 3 UMB retrofitting · finding: only 50% of all UMBs could remain partly occupied during retrofitting | finding | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | Alternative 3 UMB retrofitting · finding: retrofitting would disrupt about 40% of a building at a time on average | finding | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | Seismic retrofitting Alternative 1 for San Francisco unreinforced masonry buildings (UMBs) · finding: owner-burden ratios for most UMBs in the range of 11% to 40% | finding | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | Seismic retrofit Alternative 1 for San Francisco unreinforced masonry buildings · finding: 13% of owners in greater or greatest hardship categories | finding | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | Seismic retrofit Alternative 2 for San Francisco unreinforced masonry buildings · finding: 33% of owners in greater or greatest hardship categories | finding | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | Seismic retrofit Alternative 3 for San Francisco unreinforced masonry buildings · finding: 75% of owners in greater or greatest hardship categories | finding | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | Seismic retrofit Alternative 1 (unreinforced masonry buildings) · finding: range of annual rent increases clusters around two | finding | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | Seismic retrofit Alternative 2 (unreinforced masonry buildings) · finding: range of annual rent increases clusters around three | finding | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | Seismic retrofit Alternative 3 (unreinforced masonry buildings) · finding: range of annual rent increases clusters around four | finding | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | San Francisco unreinforced masonry buildings retrofitting · other: construction period implications analyzed assuming retrofitting work done for all buildings | finding | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | Seismic retrofitting Alternative 1 for San Francisco unreinforced masonry buildings · finding: would pose the least hardship for building occupants among the retrofitting alternatives | finding | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | UMB buildings under Alternative 1 retrofitting · finding: It is unlikely that any buildings would be required to be vacated for retrofitting under Alternative 1 | finding | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | UMB prototype groups A, E, G, K under Alternative 2 · finding: Buildings in prototype groups A, E, G, and K (small, one to three story UMBs) assumed vacated for retrofitting under Alternative 2 | finding | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | UMB prototype groups A, E, G, K, I, L, M under Alternative 3 · finding: Buildings in prototype groups A, E, G, K, I, L, and M assumed vacated for retrofitting under Alternative 3 | finding | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1990 | UMB retrofitting under Alternative 2 · finding: One-third of the UMBs would be vacated for retrofitting under Alternative 2 | finding | City report: Seismic retrofitting alternatives for San Francisco's unreinforced masonry buildings : socioeconomic and land use implications of alternative requirements scanned page ↗ |
| 1991 | Survey of San Francisco unreinforced masonry buildings · other: Condition of all of the City's unreinforced masonry buildings was carefully surveyed | finding | City report: San Francisco's Loma Prieta experience : with an emphasis on state programs and policies and their implications for local recovery scanned page ↗ |
All 24 records, with filters · this place's data as JSON · release v0.7.1 · CC0 1.0