Qipudata
San Francisco · v0.7.1
qipu data›San Francisco›Places›Mission Viaduct

Mission Viaduct

Named in the records1908–1985

54 records of San Francisco tie this place, 1908–1985: 35 decisions of the Board of Supervisors and 19 facts read from city reports. Open the full list, with filters for years, kind and outcome. See the page about Mission Viaduct: what it is, who appears with it.

Kind
Named in the records
Records
54: 35 Board decisions, 19 facts from city reports
Years
1908–1985

What the records say

All 54 records, in date order. The one-line summaries were written by a language model from the printed page; open the page to check the wording.

WhenWhat the record saysOutcomeSource
1908-10-26The Board adopted $250 (≈ $9,359 in 2026 dollars) for plans and specifications for the Mission Viaduct over Islais Creek, by 18 votes.passedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1908-10-26Plans ordered for the Mission Viaduct over Islais CreekordinanceBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1909-12-13$2,020 (≈ $75,624 in 2026 dollars) paid to property owners for Mission Viaduct damagepassedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1910Mission Viaduct · other: Work done under bondprojectCity report: Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]
scanned page ↗
1910Mission Viaduct · finding: Board of Public Works has no legal right to retain money due Healy-Tibbitts and Massachusetts Bonding contractorsfindingCity report: Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]
scanned page ↗
1910Mission Viaduct approaches fill · finding: none of the Charter provisions concerning the making of contracts were complied withfindingCity report: Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]
scanned page ↗
1910Mission Viaduct fill by United Railroads · cost usd: 15 cents a cubic yardmeasureCity report: Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]
scanned page ↗
1910Board of Public Works contract for Mission Viaduct fill · finding: total absence of any official action of the Board of Public Works regarding the alleged contractfindingCity report: Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]
scanned page ↗
1910Mission Viaduct · other: fill to be made on the first or southerly section of the viaduct per Black letterprojectCity report: Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]
scanned page ↗
1910Mission Viaduct approaches · finding: United Railroads has no valid claim against the City and County for work or materials furnished to complete the approachesfindingCity report: Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]
scanned page ↗
1910-02-21Mission Viaduct · other: agreement of February 21, 1910 between City and United Railroads on contribution toward viaductactionCity report: Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]
scanned page ↗
1910-02-21Mission Viaduct · cost usd: United Railroads promise of work and labor on viaduct to the extent of $30,000.00actionCity report: Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]
scanned page ↗
1910-02-21Mission Viaduct approaches fill · other: United Railroads to make fill for approaches to permanent viaduct, approximately 20,000 cubic yardsprojectCity report: Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]
scanned page ↗
1910-02-25Resolution No. 5400 (New Series) · adopted: Board of Supervisors resolution incorporating agreement on Mission ViaductactionCity report: Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]
scanned page ↗
1911Board approved payments for street cement, a Richmond Police Station contract, a Seventh street fire house wiring job, and Mission viaduct work.passedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1911Keystone Construction Company was granted a ninety-day blasting permit for sewer excavation at the Mission viaduct, subject to a $2500 (≈ $90,252 in 2026 dollars) bond.passedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1911Keystone Construction Company was granted a 90-day permit to blast while building the Mission viaduct sewer.passedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1911Payment of $2,863.73 (≈ $103,383 in 2026 dollars) to Healy-Tibbitts Construction Co. as a fourth installment on the northerly Mission Viaduct contract approved.passedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1911Resolution authorizes $23,389.93 (≈ $844,396 in 2026 dollars) from the General Fund for cement, a police station, a fire house and Mission viaduct work.resolutionBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1911Proposed $7,755.75 (≈ $279,989 in 2026 dollars) payment to Healy-Tibbitts Construction Company for the north end of Mission viaduct.resolutionBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1911Healy-Tibbitts Construction Co. was authorized to receive $2,863.73 (≈ $103,383 in 2026 dollars) for work on the northerly section of Mission Viaduct.resolutionBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1911-08-28City approved $7,755.75 (≈ $279,989 in 2026 dollars) second payment to Healy-Tibbitts Construction Company for north end of Mission viaduct.passedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1911-09-18Board authorized payments for fire station construction on Seventh street and San Bruno avenue, plus Mission Viaduct and street repairs.passedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1911-11-20City payments for a Southern Pacific rail bridge at Miguel Street and the Mission Viaduct were proposed; the vote continues on the next page.resolutionBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1911-12-18Baker & Hamilton claims $771.98 (≈ $27,869 in 2026 dollars) for hardware used on the Mission viaduct built by Keystone Construction Company.referredBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1912-03-25Board adopted, as amended, a resolution urging city departments to speed plans for the Geary Street Railroad, incinerators, Mission Viaduct and schools.passedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1912-03-25The Mission Promotion Association was granted permission to hold exercises celebrating completion of the Mission Viaduct.passedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1912-08-26Mission Promotion Association's request to celebrate the Mission viaduct's completion on September 15, 1912 was granted.passedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1912-09-10Mission Promotion Association asked to move the Mission Viaduct celebration from September 15 to September 22, 1912; referred.referredBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1913-06-09Resolution 10,202 authorized payments for Civic Center land, a Mission viaduct, a fire engine house, and orphanage maintenance; passed 18 to 0.passedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1913-07-14Supervisors approved payments for school repairs, Lincoln way, the Mission Viaduct, animal impounding and other city expenses.passedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1927-11-21Road money set for Turk Street and the Mission viaductresolutionBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1928-02-06Alemany Boulevard built from Ocean Avenue to Mission viaductpassedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1928-02-06Alemany Boulevard to be built from Ocean Avenue to Mission viaductpassedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1928-02-14Alemany Boulevard to be built from Ocean Avenue to Mission viaductpassedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1931-08-17Proposed paving of Alemany Boulevard, Section B, from Admiral Street to Mission Viaduct, estimated at $25,000 (≈ $554,178 in 2026 dollars).passed first readingBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1931-08-24Alemany Boulevard to get permanent paving from Admiral Street to Mission ViaductpassedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1931-08-24Alemany Boulevard to be paved from Admiral Street to Mission ViaductordinanceBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1931-10-19Alemany Boulevard to be resurfaced between Mission viaduct and Bay Shorepassed first readingBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1931-10-26Alemany Boulevard resurfacing ordered from the Mission viaduct to Bay ShorepassedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1932-01-04Sixty-day extension granted to Fay Improvement Company to finish improving Alemany Boulevard from Admiral Avenue to Mission viaduct.passedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1950-06-05Stop intersections were designated at corners of Rousseau, Lyell, Cayuga, Alemany and Admiral Streets during Mission Viaduct reconstruction.passedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1950-06-05Rousseau, Lyell and Admiral Streets set southbound pending Mission Viaduct workpassedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1950-06-05Left-hand turns from Alemany Boulevard into Lyell and Rousseau Streets were banned temporarily during Mission Viaduct reconstruction.passedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1950-06-05Parking was banned on both sides of Cayuga Avenue between Cuvier and Lyell Streets, temporarily, during Mission Viaduct work.passedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1950-06-05A temporary traffic regulation adopted pending Mission Viaduct reconstructionresolutionBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1985Islais and Salinas Water Company dam · other: small dam built west of the old Mission Viaduct near Rock House GulchbuildingCity report: San Francisco water & power : a history of the Municipal Water Department and Hetch Hetchy System
scanned page ↗
1910Mission Viaduct · other: Payment for making the necessary earth fill at the approaches to the Mission ViaductprojectCity report: Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]
scanned page ↗
1910Mission Viaduct earth fill · cost usd: $20,000.00 paid by United Railroads of San FranciscoactionCity report: Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]
scanned page ↗
1910Mission Viaduct · cost usd: United Railroads offered to do work amounting to $30,000 or thereabouts, including a fillprojectCity report: Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]
scanned page ↗
1910Mission Viaduct · other: Keystone Construction Company failed to perform its contract; work completed by Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company as suretyeventCity report: Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]
scanned page ↗
1910Mission Viaduct · other: Healy-Tibbitts Construction Company fully performed its contract for the second sectioneventCity report: Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]
scanned page ↗
1910Mission Viaduct · finding: Contractors were under no obligation to replace earth removed to carry forward their contractsfindingCity report: Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]
scanned page ↗
1910Mission Viaduct · finding: No reason found for Board of Public Works retention of funds for the United Railroads fillfindingCity report: Official opinions of Percy V. Long, City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California ; [1908-1912]
scanned page ↗

All 54 records, with filters · this place's data as JSON · release v0.7.1 · CC0 1.0