Qipudata
San Francisco · v0.7.1
qipu data›San Francisco›Places›Red Rock Hill

Red Rock Hill

Named in the records1961–1973

97 records of San Francisco tie this place, 1961–1973: 1 decision of the Board of Supervisors and 96 facts read from city reports. Open the full list, with filters for years, kind and outcome.

Kind
Named in the records
Records
97: 1 Board decision, 96 facts from city reports
Years
1961–1973

What the records say

The 60 most telling of its 97 records, in date order: the ones an editor picked first, then the highest scored. The one-line summaries were written by a language model from the printed page; open the page to check the wording.

WhenWhat the record saysOutcomeSource
1961San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Architectural Advisory Panel · other: select and pay compensation for the ten best designsagencyCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · lead agency: San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, in cooperation with the Northern California Chapter of the American Institute of ArchitectsagencyCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill Competition · units: approximately 990 apartmentsprojectCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill Competition · acreage: 22 acres of landprojectCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill Competition · other: ten schematic designs selectedfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill Competition · other: Agency to select up to five of the ten schemes for developersrecommendationCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: topography would require ingenious schemes and extensive study of architectural detailfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: wind in the afternoon was blowing across the top of the site at a notable velocityfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · recommendation: developer should review mean annual climatic conditions of the arearecommendationCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · event: number having merit reduced to fifteeneventCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · other: winning submissions should show as many diversified ideas of merit as possiblefindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · other: architect members emphasized design aspects while developers focused on economic aspectsfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Red Rock Hill tower scheme · finding: free-standing towers emphasizing and giving identity to Red Rock HillfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Red Rock Hill parking · finding: parking very well integrated and located with respect to tenant accessibilityfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Red Rock Hill parking · finding: hexagonal shape needlessly expensive and less efficientfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Red Rock Hill site · finding: no means of sheltering the open spaces of the site from the windfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Red Rock Hill site · finding: concept makes no attempt to define the usable open spacesfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Red Rock Hill apartments · finding: tower concept acceptable; hexagonal apartment shapes arbitrary and economically impracticalfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Red Rock Hill apartments · recommendation: use more conventional designs, retaining architectural and monumental characterrecommendationCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: excellent solution in the general expression and character of the projectfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: solution is harmonious with the topography in respect to practical considerations and an esthetic approachfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: access to and from the streets successfully solved, with circulation articulated to adjacent community facilities to the southfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights competition scheme · recommendation: further study required for design privacy and circulation in corridor structure connecting high-rise unitsrecommendationCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights competition scheme · finding: economically feasible; floor plans would support the suggested rentalsfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights competition scheme · finding: length of corridors in the corridor high-rise buildings may be excessivefindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights competition scheme · finding: adequate open space areas that could satisfactorily be developed for recreational purposesfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights competition scheme · finding: dramatic scale of towers to be weighed against cost of extended perimeter wall areafindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights competition scheme · finding: desirable balance of elevator to garden-type buildings achievedfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights competition scheme · finding: highly imaginative and competently executed schemefindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Red Rock Hill · other: one of the three elevations of Diamond HeightssiteCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Red Rock Hill competition submission (three curved slabs) · finding: monumentality and extended length of the slabs are overbearingfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Red Rock Hill competition submission (low-rise buildings) · finding: many low-rise buildings on the south slope are remote from parking spacesfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Red Rock Hill competition submission (pedestrian access) · finding: pedestrian access to the community center to the south is not properly providedfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Red Rock Hill competition submission · finding: submission does not seem to assure economic feasibilityfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Red Rock Hill competition submission (rental buildings) · finding: buildings are not in character with the rental scale set forth in the programfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Red Rock Hill competition scheme, Diamond Heights · finding: site plan of excellent quality; low-rise units sited with sensitivity to roads and contoursfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Tower apartments crowning Red Rock Hill · finding: architecture and detail fall off rapidly; towers undistinguished, though they should have outstanding architectural meritfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Taller row units placed against the hillside, Red Rock Hill · finding: excessive foundation and retaining wall problems; likely excessive costfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Red Rock Hill competition scheme, Diamond Heights · finding: highly unlikely the project could be developed within the economic criteriafindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Red Rock Hill competition scheme, Diamond Heights · finding: scheme rates high in site arrangements; architecture and economic feasibility remain to be developedfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Red Rock Hill site · other: site of the architectural competition, Diamond HeightssiteCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · recommendation: Selected architects work with the successful developer in joint collaboration on the designrecommendationCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: High construction cost due to topography must be offset by a favorable land cost to meet moderate rental objectivesfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: Participant anonymity protected by numbering each submission; winners identified after selectionfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: overall site plan is a thoughtful solution with good general characterfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: terrace apartments disposition shows sympathy of structures with topographyfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: concentration of high-rise and terrace apartments might challenge variety, human scale and identifiable dwelling groupsfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: omission of a large common space as dominant focal point is questionablefindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: general design quality is of high order but not the strongest exponent of a San Francisco flavorfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · finding: floor plans could support the proposed rental schedulefindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition · recommendation: three-bedroom apartments might better serve occupants if located in the terrace-apartment arearecommendationCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition project · finding: Balconies would add to general livability of units but their use is questionable due to prevailing climatic conditionsfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition project · recommendation: Recreation facilities well conceived and would add to attractiveness; use of swimming pools should be re-examinedfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition entry · finding: The attempt to preserve the feeling of a free and undisturbed flow of the site by floating the buildings is successfulfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition entry · finding: Wind screening at ground level presents a problem for further studyfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition entry · finding: The parking areas are well related to the dwelling units and adequately providedfindingCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1964-08-17Condo tax value cut for one ownerpassedBoard decision
scanned page ↗
1961[name withheld] Hill competition · event: Panel met in session following public meeting called by Redevelopment AgencyeventCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1961[name withheld] Hill competition · lead agency: San Francisco Redevelopment AgencyprojectCity report: Architectural advisory panel evaluation report : Diamond Heights, Red Rock Hill competition
scanned page ↗
1973Red Rock Hill · units: 104 units, new unsubsidized housing completedbuildingCity report: San Francisco redevelopment 1971-1973
scanned page ↗

All 97 records, with filters · this place's data as JSON · release v0.7.1 · CC0 1.0