San Francisco Superior Court
Named in the records1929–2021
53 records of San Francisco tie this place, 1929–2021: 41 decisions of the Board of Supervisors and 12 facts read from city reports. Open the full list, with filters for years, kind and outcome.
- Kind
- Named in the records
- Records
- 53: 41 Board decisions, 12 facts from city reports
- Years
- 1929–2021
What the records say
All 53 records, in date order. The one-line summaries were written by a language model from the printed page; open the page to check the wording.
| When | What the record says | Outcome | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1929-02-28 | Bill 657 would raise San Francisco Superior Court judges' salaries from $9,000 (≈ $177,337 in 2026 dollars) to $12,000 (≈ $236,449 in 2026 dollars) a year; judges spoke in support. | ordinance | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 1929-02-28 | Board disapproved Bill No. 70 increasing San Francisco Superior Court judges from sixteen to thirty-two. | ordinance | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 1929-06-17 | State bill raises San Francisco Superior Court judges' salaries from $9,000 (≈ $177,337 in 2026 dollars) to $10,000 (≈ $197,041 in 2026 dollars) a year, cut from $12,000 (≈ $236,449 in 2026 dollars). | passed first reading | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 1929-06-17 | Bill proposing to raise San Francisco Superior Court judges from 16 to 32 was disapproved in this form. | ordinance | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 1937-03-08 | Proposed resolution endorses Senate Bill 296, raising San Francisco Superior Court judges from sixteen to twenty. | resolution | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 1937-03-15 | Board endorsed State Senate Bill 296, sponsored by Senator Walter McGovern, to raise San Francisco Superior Court judges from sixteen to twenty. | passed | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 1939-02-27 | Endorsement of Senate Bill 1094 to raise San Francisco Superior Court judges from sixteen to twenty is proposed. | resolution | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 1947-06-02 | Board endorsed Assembly Bill 1441 to raise San Francisco Superior Court judges from eighteen to twenty-one. | passed | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 1966-12-27 | Board congratulated [name withheld] by letter on his appointment as a San Francisco Superior Court judge. | passed | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 1983 | Proposition 8 (San Francisco Superior Court) · finding: not causing more defendants to be sentenced to prison | finding | City report: Impact of Proposition 8 on sentencing and dispositions in San Francisco Superior Courts scanned page ↗ |
| 1985-05-06 | Two more judges urged for San Francisco Superior Court | referred | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 1985-06-24 | Two more judges urged for San Francisco Superior Court | passed | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 1991 | Charan investigation domestic violence report · recommendation: Set higher bail for domestic violence cases by the Court | recommendation | City report: San Francisco's response to domestic violence : the Charan investigation : report scanned page ↗ |
| 1991 | Charan investigation domestic violence report · recommendation: Schedule domestic violence cases to trial as soon as possible with priority on the trial calendar | recommendation | City report: San Francisco's response to domestic violence : the Charan investigation : report scanned page ↗ |
| 1991 | Charan investigation domestic violence report · recommendation: Take a more active role in determining whether the District Attorney's sentencing recommendation is appropriate | recommendation | City report: San Francisco's response to domestic violence : the Charan investigation : report scanned page ↗ |
| 1991 | Charan investigation domestic violence report · recommendation: Ensure a translator is available to victims whether or not the victim is scheduled to testify | recommendation | City report: San Francisco's response to domestic violence : the Charan investigation : report scanned page ↗ |
| 1999-03-12 | Supervisor Newsom urged the San Francisco Superior Court to adopt the One Day or [name withheld] jury system; sent to committee. | referred | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2001-05-07 | A proposed ordinance would pay [name withheld] $102,000 (≈ $194,059 in 2026 dollars) to settle her San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit against the City; sent to committee. | referred | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2001-05-07 | A proposed ordinance would pay [name withheld] $50,000 (≈ $95,127 in 2026 dollars) to settle his San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit against the City; sent to committee. | referred | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2002-06-10 | Resolution proposed commending [name withheld] on his retirement from the San Francisco Superior Court. | resolution | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2005 | The Board adopted a resolution commending [name withheld] for his contributions to the San Francisco Superior Court, sponsored by Supervisor Sandoval. | passed | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2005-02-23 | Rules Committee recommended a $65,000 (≈ $112,141 in 2026 dollars) settlement of [name withheld] San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit against the City. | ordinance | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2005-02-23 | Rules Committee recommended a $137,500 (≈ $237,221 in 2026 dollars) settlement of [name withheld] San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit against the City. | ordinance | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2005-06-28 | Passed ordinance appropriating $260,000 (≈ $448,563 in 2026 dollars) from the General Fund Reserve for indigent defense costs in San Francisco Superior Court. | passed | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2005-06-28 | $260,000 (≈ $448,563 in 2026 dollars) from the General Fund Reserve approved for indigent defense costs in San Francisco Superior Court cases, passed. | passed | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2006-01-17 | City agreed to pay $53,150 (≈ $88,831 in 2026 dollars) to settle [name withheld] lawsuit filed in 2005 in San Francisco Superior Court. | passed | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2006-01-17 | City agreed to pay $190,000 (≈ $317,553 in 2026 dollars) to settle [name withheld] lawsuit filed in November 2001 in San Francisco Superior Court. | passed | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2006-01-17 | City agreed to pay $75,000 (≈ $125,350 in 2026 dollars) to settle [name withheld] lawsuit filed in September 2004 in San Francisco Superior Court. | passed | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2008-01-15 | Proposed ordinance authorizing an $87,500 (≈ $136,934 in 2026 dollars) settlement of [name withheld] lawsuit against the City, filed in San Francisco Superior Court. | ordinance | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2009-03-24 | Ordinance approves an $85,000 (≈ $133,496 in 2026 dollars) settlement of [name withheld] San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit against the city. | passed | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2009-06-04 | Rules Committee recommended an ordinance accepting $30,000 (≈ $47,116 in 2026 dollars) from U.[name withheld] to settle the city's San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit. | ordinance | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2009-06-23 | City approves paying [name withheld] $50,000 (≈ $78,527 in 2026 dollars) to settle her San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit. | passed | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2009-12-08 | City proposes paying [name withheld] $230,000 (≈ $361,225 in 2026 dollars) to settle her San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit; passed on first reading. | passed first reading | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2010-04-30 | Proposed $134,000 (≈ $207,057 in 2026 dollars) settlement of [name withheld] San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit against the City; sent to Rules Committee. | referred | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2010-04-30 | Proposed $29,500 (≈ $45,583 in 2026 dollars) settlement of [name withheld] San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit against the City; sent to Rules Committee. | referred | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2013 | A $100,000 (≈ $144,636 in 2026 dollars) settlement with [name withheld] over his San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit was sent to the Rules Committee. | referred | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2013-07-23 | City proposed paying $350,000 (≈ $506,226 in 2026 dollars) to settle a San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit by [name withheld]; passed on first reading. | passed first reading | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2014-06-03 | City proposes paying [name withheld] $43,000 (≈ $61,201 in 2026 dollars) to settle her San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit; passed on first reading. | passed first reading | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2014-06-03 | City proposes paying [name withheld] $40,000 (≈ $56,931 in 2026 dollars) to settle his San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit; passed on first reading. | passed first reading | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2014-06-10 | Ordinance authorizing payment of $105,000 (≈ $149,444 in 2026 dollars) to [name withheld] to settle her San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit against the City passed. | passed | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2015-11-03 | City agreed to pay AIG Property Casualty Company $70,000 (≈ $99,511 in 2026 dollars) to settle a lawsuit filed in San Francisco Superior Court. | passed | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2021-09-28 | Superior Court urged to put criminal records requests online | resolution | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2021-10-05 | Superior Court urged to put criminal records requests online | passed | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2021-10-05 | Superior Court urged to put criminal records requests online | resolution | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2021-10-19 | Superior Court urged to prioritise criminal trials, sent to committee | resolution | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 2021-12-14 | City urges courts to speed criminal trials, open more courtrooms | passed | Board decision scanned page ↗ |
| 1985 | Superior Court sentencing hearings · other: 32 cases referred in first month, saving 224 custody days | finding | City report: Report to the mayor from the Jail Overcrowding Committee scanned page ↗ |
| 1972 | San Francisco Superior Court block grant · cost usd: 38,500 | project | City report: The flow of federal funds : an assessment for San Francisco scanned page ↗ |
| 1983 | San Francisco Superior Court · finding: reduction in dismissals from 15% to 9% (JD 82) | finding | City report: Impact of Proposition 8 on sentencing and dispositions in San Francisco Superior Courts scanned page ↗ |
| 1983 | Proposition 8 (San Francisco Superior Court) · finding: no upward trend in state prison commitments or length of prison terms | finding | City report: Impact of Proposition 8 on sentencing and dispositions in San Francisco Superior Courts scanned page ↗ |
| 1983 | Proposition 8 (San Francisco Superior Court) · finding: 40% of cases coming to Superior Court arose through certified felony pleas | finding | City report: Impact of Proposition 8 on sentencing and dispositions in San Francisco Superior Courts scanned page ↗ |
| 1983 | San Francisco Superior Court arraignments · other: dropped from 1428 to 1097 arraignments | finding | City report: Impact of Proposition 8 on sentencing and dispositions in San Francisco Superior Courts scanned page ↗ |
| 1983 | San Francisco Superior Court sentences · other: stayed the same, 1610 to 1559 sentences | finding | City report: Impact of Proposition 8 on sentencing and dispositions in San Francisco Superior Courts scanned page ↗ |
All 53 records, with filters · this place's data as JSON · release v0.7.1 · CC0 1.0